TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BedSpreadMD Archive

View 0 posts and 61 comments by BedSpreadMD on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Some people would say that paying for sex is cheating. Sounds like moving of the goalposts. She'd have a significantly easier time than her exact male counterpart, that's for sure. Look at these reality shows about morbidly obese people. Almost all the women have boyfriends or husbands. Because they have money. There's hideous men who get on reality shows that have the same thing happen bud.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:50 PM
0

No. Not unless he's paying for it. So someone can easily get laid by your own admission, but that doesn't count because he paid for it? Women, on the other hand, don't need game to have sex. Hahahahaha so the woman who's face is covered in acne, weights 350 lbs, and has a severe overbite has no problem getting laid? Lol come on brother.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:34 PM
-2

Not all women have an easy time getting laid. The only people who think so are people with a stupid "grass is always greener" mentality. The idea can easily apply to men. Most men can easily get laid too, just not with the women they want. There's a lot of fat hideous women out there who don't get any and are desperate.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:16 PM
2

Says the person who's clearly not a woman and doesn't know what women go through.
/r/MensRights25/10/25 05:06 PM
7

If we're being fair here, the word was never created with the direction of men in mind. It's just short for involuntarily celibate. I've met a great deal of women who are incels.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 09:57 PM
0

How are they social problems? Or do you not understand what the word "social" means?
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:47 AM
4

I've been saying for the past 8 years that the whole "you're either with us or against us" mentality would backfire. Now that beast's ugly head is rearing itself. Turns out you need moderates and centrists to win an election.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 11:45 AM
-2

Those aren't social problems...
/r/MensRights24/10/25 04:48 AM
34

100% this. Just joining this sub got me perma banned from a bunch of left wing subs. Yet I've never once been banned from a conservative sub, despite joining multiple left wing subs. Just associating or listening to what some conservative figures have to say will get you ostracized by many groups of leftists. I have to imagine that's 10x worse in the gay community which is dominated by leftists. I've met gay people who intentionally stay silent on subjects out of fear of being bullied.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 09:54 PM
2

they are a big part of our social problems Such as?
/r/MensRights23/10/25 09:50 PM
9

My ex-girlfriend constantly tried to justify her abuse by calling it reactive abuse to what I was doing. Me too. Didn't text her for more than 30 minutes and was hanging out with friends. She really didn't like when I hung out with my male friends, and did everything she could to keep me away from them. Left her ass and never looked back.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 03:05 AM
1

Argue in bad faith harder clown. Also, the word where doesn't always mean prostitute. A person considered sexually promiscuous https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=Whore
/r/MensRights14/10/25 02:24 AM
1

Nope, the word hoe/ho is slang for someone who is sexually promiscuous. a person and especially a woman who has multiple sexual partners : a sexually promiscuous person https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ho
/r/MensRights13/10/25 07:32 PM
1

Yeah yeah sure sure. Also no it's calling them a hoe spelled incorrectly, but you do you boo.
/r/MensRights13/10/25 03:07 PM
3

Calling someone a hoe isn't hate speech, anyone from either gender can be a hoe.
/r/MensRights12/10/25 06:15 PM
0

It doesn't belong here. The posts the OP are making seem strange and suspicious as well.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 10:13 AM
1

As someone who's known several people who've been guards in women's prisons, that is just outright BS. For example: they found in 2018 that the morality rate in women's prison exceeded that of men's prisons. Women don't use physical violence, they use psychological violence. They psychologically torture their victims until they commit suicide.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 04:08 AM
6

They are.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 08:09 PM
13

The man she killed also had his whole life in front of him. Odd she gets to keep hers while he doesn't.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 05:57 PM
2

I entirely believe that, as it would make sense mathematically. There's a very small amount of children who are catholic, and go to church regularly enough for it to happen. 90% of children attend public schools in the US, about 19% of our population considers themselves catholic, and i doubt all of that 19% attend church regularly. It's insane to see people who actively harm children being protected.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 02:10 AM
1

The way i developed patience was from working in retail. I realised nothing is worth getting angry over, it lends you absolutely nothing. Write down your feelings, and become self-aware of how you're feeling and the impact it has on your current surroundings. It will help you develop mental discipline, and help you direct your thoughts towards the things you want out of life, rather than the things that bother you. The more time you spend thinking about what you want for yourself and your future…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 05:41 PM
6

Our Spanish teacher seemed to float around the boys It's always the Spanish teacher
/r/MensRights25/09/25 05:13 PM
26

They've always been around. Most just usually didn't face consequences for it. My middle school had one, and my high school had one as well. Of course, my middle school also had a teacher who was notorious for assaulting and battering the students there, and was never charged. It's insane how much the teachers union protected scumbags in that school district.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 04:17 PM
6

Enjoy being wrong.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:49 PM
4

No just what was revealed in his texts and discord. Especially discord, it's a haven for hate speech and toxic extreme discussions but his chats didn't have any of that. You're compartmentalizating and trying to isolate things. he wasn't a crazy radical until he planned this. Are you serious? Nah he was definitely radicalized before this. People who are radicalized don't just say radicalized stuff non-stop, they have moments of normality. Had he behaved that way with friends, they probably would…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:43 PM
10

He "planned" in only a week bc he saw he was coming. Spur of the moment. Two weeks of planning isn't "spur of the moment". He began planning the second he heard he had the opportunity. I'm not saying what he did is acceptable Neither is anyone accusing you of that. By all means, a normal dude Yes, because it's totally normal to plan someone's assassination, and to date a trans person... /s But everything in the discord chats and the indictment didn't show anything with a history of being a radic…
/r/MensRights17/09/25 04:48 PM
14

As of now, he seem like a normal dude Normal? Normal is the word you would use to describe an individual who has a trans girlfriend and planned the assassination of another person? Really? We don't know what radicalized him. Sorry, but we know exactly what radicalized him. It's pretty obvious for someone who isn't willfully ignorant.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 04:28 PM
90

Wait, wasn't the kirk assassin in a relationship?
/r/MensRights17/09/25 11:02 AM
22

Especially when there's basically only one group who's "unprotected".
/r/MensRights16/09/25 07:46 AM
5

For NY and CA this sentence is normal, everywhere else life is considered normal. I knew a dude who killed a guy in a fit of anger, he's now serving life in prison with a chance of parole in 30 years. I hope they never let him out, because he was a legit sociopath.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 03:37 AM
2

You know, you wouldn't think you'd see this happen with multiple officers, but this exact thing seems to happen regularly. I remember seeing a man during the BLM protests having his pants pulled down and tasered in the genitals. It's wild how many officers can seem to do this and never be truly held accountable.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 11:01 PM
1

Just because you can point out an exception doesn't make the general idea any less false. I have seen and read many many cases of right-leaning teachers being forced out of their positions for holding right-leaning opinions. I have yet to see a single left-leaning teacher being fired for a left-leaning opinion. The fact that left-leaning people run 9 out of 10 colleges (the deans) says a lot. Every single ivy league college has a dean that's openly left-leaning.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:45 AM
1

Idaho, Georgia, are states that have rape laws that explicitly apply to males because of how they're written. Idaho requires you to have a penis in order to rape someone. Georgia explicitly says that rape can only take place against females with a vagina.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:03 AM
1

than women who have been harmed makes any discussion pointless. Bruh, gtfo with your bad reddit take. The woman in this situation hasn't been harmed. Secondly men get harmed by unwanted contact too, you're just making yourself look a fool here. You're simply butthurt because I called you out for using insanely stupid stereotypes.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 10:44 AM
2

I would never stereotype any group. Yet you did. I guarantee this woman told him no several times. And he ignored it or decided she was playing hard to get. This is a massive stereotype. It's also quite ironic because it wasn't what happened in this case. But if you think that women who have been assaulted haven’t said “No”, you’re tripping. Assault is verbally threatening someone with harm. Don't be using words you don't understand. let’s normalize not touching people without their consent. Too…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:33 AM
5

Dude, the second you meet someone who uses the word incel in a serious manner when describing another person, just walk away. They're not worth engaging with, and are probably projecting. Every single time I've seen someone use that word, it turned out they're an incel themselves. Going around calling people incels just tells you they lack all social awareness, and is probably got some serious unaddressed mental disorder.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 07:15 PM
3

Maybe the girls are less destructive, violent, likely to lash out physically? Hahahaha never seen what a women's prison is like huh? You would think so but they're not. That would make them better candidates for something that has the potential to make officials look bad if someone who was supposed to be incarcerated hurts someone else. That's why I said it's redundant to pick only women. Why not just pick non-violent offenders? There's a reason why you can't do this in the US, it would be shot …
/r/MensRights12/09/25 07:40 AM
1

I don't think many people see the fifth wave as separate from the fourth wave. They are incredibly similar, but that's because the movement has mostly watered down to extreme left positions.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 02:42 AM
-1

Outright untrue. People like you give this sub a bad name.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:37 PM
4

Do you seriously think that saying “No” or “don’t touch me” is effective against unwanted advances. Yes. Otherwise it could be categorized as battery. I guarantee this woman told him no several times. And he ignored it or decided she was playing hard to get. Got some evidence for your claims? Or are you just stereotyping men?
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:18 PM
-1

Not even remotely true. Go research the difference in waves. First wave feminists don't advocate for anything modern fifth wave feminists do.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:17 PM
1

The waves of feminism isn't based on the individuals but things they stood for First wave: Their goals revolve around having the right to vote, education, own property, and be legally recognized as citizens independent from their husbands. Second wave: Their goals seek out to address a broader range of issues, including sexuality, family, the workplace, and reproductive rights. Third wave: This wave saw the emergence of new feminist currents and theories, such as intersectionality, sex positivit…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 10:13 PM
7

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7480822/ Pretty damn easy. It's called therapy to address undying issues that are the root cause for self-harm. Dialectical behavior therapy. Cognitive behavioral therapy. Mentalization-Based Treatment for Adolescents. Should I keep naming more? They chose girls because in the western world girls generally get more sympathy than boys And why precisely does this have a bearing on the policy? they were vastly disproportionately represented by the chosen met…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:40 PM
7

They are, there are boys in Secure Children's Homes too, it's a new system and they're drastically increasing its numbers And yet they're exclusively choosing women for this new program. Why? Prioritising rehabilitation over suffering and punishment objectively reduces crime. Just look up "rehabilitation Vs punishment" or something. Countries like Norway are often praised for their justice system because it focuses on rehabilitation and is effective. Whereas countries like America are oozing wit…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 06:06 PM
6

Short of drugging all the prisoners and putting them in straight jackets, self-harm isn't "easily preventable". Ignoring the part where I mentioned psychological treatments, that doesn't include just drugs. But maybe you think drugging then is the answer, which I won't argue against anymore than I'd argue against any other fucked up idea. If you think improving living conditions is less ideal than drugging, then I don't know what to tell you. Here comes the strawman. starting with a smaller grou…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:30 PM
7

Secure Children's Homes aren't foster care. Maybe you prioritise punishment/suffering over reformation and rehabilitation but I actually want crime reduced, not perpetuated. Then why are young men, who commit the overwhelming majority of crime not getting the same treatment? Also, this won't reduce crime, it'll increase it. Going light on crime will always result in these individuals reoffending, especially when the punishment is more or less a government version of being grounded.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:15 PM
12

Self harm. It's an absurd asinine excuse. Self harm can easily be prevented in prison. Psychological treatments and medication can also be administered in prison. Also there's this: https://www.vera.org/publications/culture-of-safety-sentinel-event-suicide-self-harm-correctional-facilities/culture-of-safety/overview There are also clear demographic trends in jail suicides: men incarcerated in jail are 50 percent more likely to commit suicide than women.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 05:13 PM
3

Nah they're feminists, they're just not modern feminists. The endless number of times I've heard "I'm not feminist" by simply having discussions with them, they don't agree with 4th and 5th wave feminism, which is what almost everyone dislikes. They're actually just 1st or 2nd wave feminists.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:28 PM
10

Oh no, they're going to send them off to foster care for a few years until they turn 17. /s
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:18 PM
9

What an asinine excuse.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:10 PM
1

Ok "expert" lol
/r/MensRights09/09/25 10:58 PM
1

If you can introduce a lab report without any testimony or other evidence its authentic, that means anyone can just make a piece of paper that says the DNA matches. Hahahahaha yeah ok "expert". You clearly don't know what you're talking about and it's comical. Tell me, where did you get your law degree, expert.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:28 PM
1

Forensic evidence depends on witness testimony, like the testimony of who collected it and who tested it. Spoken like a true fool on the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:23 PM
1

Why are you conflating sexual assault and rape? They're not the same thing. Also, you can prove rape through forensic tests. Sexual assault mostly runs on eye witness testimony, which is why there's a very low rate of success when it comes to prosecuting it.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 08:05 AM
1

Or how about acting like an adult and simply asking not to be touched? How hard is it to say "no offense, but I don't like being touched, and would respectfully ask you don't do so in the future"?
/r/MensRights09/09/25 08:02 AM
3

The same reason any authoritarian does it. To try and lend credibility to their movement. It's not about truth or accuracy to them. All that matters is generating support for their movement to force their agenda forward. Since they can't seem to find any notable figures who are alive, they simply use ones from history. A dead historical figure works the best, because they're not capable of refuting things.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 04:12 AM
6

Kamala? Yes. So you think the woman who lied non-stop and couldn't tell anyone what her policies was would've been a good leader? Lol your partisanship is showing. One side accepts the results of elections… and facts and reality. Hahahaha neither side accepts the results when they lose. Did you forget how everyone claimed Musk hacked voting machines using starlink in 2024. Or how about muh russia endlessly coming from Hilary after she lost. How about them hanging chads. You're living in a fantas…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 11:50 PM
2

And trump or kamala is? Lmao come on.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 11:05 PM
5

And what were the realistic chances of the other 2 winning? lol Would've been a lot higher had people actually voted for them instead of willingly choosing a dichotomy. That’s the same as not voting at all. Lol whatever delusion you want to sell yourself.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 10:03 PM
5

Ah yes, because our only options are the left or trump. I'm sure that "you're either with us or against us" mentality will work out well for the democratic party. I believe there were 4 people on the ballot in 2024.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 09:37 PM
5

Yeah but the problem is, even if he did speak up, there's a good chance of him being alienated from the class. Good luck at fighting retaliation in the form of low grades from the teacher, which you will then have to take all over, and pay for out of pocket.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 05:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter