TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeeeeboBrinker Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by BeeeeboBrinker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-6

Having sex with someone who is incapacitated and can't tell you to stop isn't funny or cute. It's rape. This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:19 AM
6

This article is well laid out and makes some really clear and strong points. Personally, I think it's a mistake to try to argue moral equivalence. You get bogged down in the minutia. And you tend to focus only on the cases which have significant overlap, so you end up only showing that sometimes they are morally equivalent. All circumcision done without consent is wrong, regardless of their particular and individual location on some moral equivalency scale.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:09 AM
12

I don't see anywhere that the CDC is "close to recommending circumcision for all newborns". I'm only see that they would provide recommendations about the information that should be provided during counseling on circumcision, such as data from studies showing decreased risk for STIs. If I'm missing something, could you point me in the right direction? I did notice that they are saying religion and culture should be taken into account when counseling on circumcision, which seems like an idiotic p…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:57 PM
1

I think you were perhaps a little more thoughtful than OP intended.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:45 PM
1

Calling this a "lynching" is just plain stupid. It's like the author doesn't even want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:41 PM
1

I'm a little weirded out by your expression of love for this particular news organization. I'm not really familiar with their general capacity with numbers, but this article is pretty shitty. They compare median wages without even considering that the difference doesn't actually represent a problem. There is no reason at all that we should expect these two medians to be the same, particularly since they've lumped everyone together by gender without considering education, experience, or even type…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:38 PM
1

This is a stupid idea. Why don't you spend some of that creative energy on coming up with ways to actually help men instead of wasting time taking cheap shots at feminists?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:24 PM
4

What the hell is wrong with people?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:22 PM
-34

Even in the western world, women have been burned to death by their own families for "allowing themselves" to be raped.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 09:21 PM
5

This is abuse. I couldn't even get to the end. She's unfit. Even if you are okay with the slapping, there's still the verbal abuse. Those kids are so small too.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:09 PM
1

Agreed.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:02 PM
5

Your interpretation is correct. We've just got some here who apparently think "it ain't over 'til I say it's over" and that they have some sort of right to keep going after their partner tells them to stop. That's ALWAYS been rape in my book. It's hard for me to wrap my head around the idea that there are "men" here who think otherwise and are actually shocked by the idea.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 07:01 PM
8

Yes, continuing to have sex with someone after they tell you to stop is rape. Who didn't know this? And you aren't "in the middle of intercourse" if one of the two people decides they want to stop. You are at the end. Intercourse is officially over. If you keep going, you are actually a rapist.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:44 PM
5

So, let me get this straight: All liberals think all men are rapists?
/r/MensRights11/01/15 05:01 AM
2

If you keep sending ignorant people away, how are they ever going to learn anything? Let them stay so you can browbeat them a bit when they screw up.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:59 AM
3

I was wondering how you fit into the definition of "liberal", so I looked it up: liberal = favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs Seems like you've got all the bases covered.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:53 AM
2

Which is super ironic considering the author's title and very first line.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:47 AM
1

This post should have a "Progess" tag on it. From the title, I expected it to be news about female officers not being held to the same standard. But the article is actually saying the opposite, that they have just recently instituted a standard and process for remedying the problem.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:38 AM
3

The article is actually revealing progress toward equality. The standard was just introduced this past year. People who still fail after two retests get marked "unsatisfactory performance" and are required to engage in training to get up to the standard. So not only are they holding female officers to the same standard and making the results publicly available, there are actual consequences for not meeting the standard. This is actually good news.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:34 AM
12

And she's already out again on bail! This article doesn't mention it, but the court let her out on bail the first time after she'd already confessed to the police. Her attorney asked that the confession and the evidence collected as a result of the confession be thrown out because she was "intimidated" by the police. So a confessed child-rapist was released on bail by the court, and then proceeded to rape another child to kill time while waiting for her trial. So OF COURSE the court grants her b…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 04:18 AM
7

In the last sentence, she uses "accused rapist" as if the word "accused" wasn't even in there or as if the word "accused" meant "actual". I guess all those women in Salem were actual witches.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 03:51 AM
3

This reminds me of the boy who got shot by his girlfriend's father when he walked in on them and she claimed not to know the boy.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:26 AM
1

People always think school still is what it was when they were experiencing it. Times have changed. We spend a lot of resources trying to fix things that aren't broken, while efforts to solve real problems go unfunded.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:21 AM
-6

We're 50% of the population, and you think getting 8% the year is a good thing? Black people are only 13% of the population and they also get 8%.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:17 AM
3

They actually did kill a woman named Elsa Cayat in the Charlie Hebdo attack. You'd think people who would shoot an office full of people over a cartoon would stick to some sort of moral code and at least not lie about how they don't kill women.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:10 AM
7

Wait, are we not allowed to think that a woman is overly ambitious? Is being overly ambitious something that can only happen to men now? This is just looking for someone who will tell you that your shit doesn't stink. What kind of strong, empowered woman can't take criticism? What kind of strong, empowered woman has to have a yes-man at her side, agreeing with everything she says? How about just looking for an equal, someone who can be supportive but challenges you to think a little? Because may…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 11:47 PM
0

I'm not going to even bother watching that given the title. Anyone who would even consider naming something "Are men obsolete?" should just hand in their human citizenship card and fuck off to live a long and bitter life on an isolated island somewhere. Responding to such a person takes no thought at all. You don't have to offer counter arguments or critiques of their position. Humans don't become obsolete.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 11:40 PM
5

I have no idea why you're bringing race or marital status into this. This isn't a single white male rights issue. It's a men's rights issue. Cosby is a married black man. And if you are going to tell me that single minority men are more favored by the media than single white men, I'm just going to have to laugh in your face, because that's ridiculous. I'll grant you the bias against single men though. That's pervasive, nasty, and deeply entrenched throughout society and warmly embraced by the me…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 11:30 PM
3

This article is useless. It says nothing we don't already know and suggests Obama himself magically balance protecting rape victims and false claim victims by just sort of doing it. Because we all know that the biggest problem here is that the federal government hasn't stepped in enough and that everyone will just listen if Obama just tells us what he wants us to do. The "solution" suggested by the article is that we all just sit down and come up with reasonable solutions that work and make ever…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 11:14 PM
9

It's weird that we have a President whose father was from Kenya who does less for Africans than GWB did. I guess it's understandable though. You've got bigots saying he isn't even American and secretly hates white people, so it's like he's trying to prove that he doesn't give a shit about Africans. Anyway, I'd encourage everyone to write to their reps, the White House, and the media. It probably won't have any effect at all, but us complaining to each other definitely won't. "It's better to ligh…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 10:45 PM
9

Unfortunately, this is a very common thing (the kidnapping of boys, not the media noticing). Boys are routinely kidnapped and forced to fight or act as support for fighters. The lose their childhood and miss out on education and forming relationships. If they survive it, they often have seen the worst of humanity. And when they return home, people tend not to trust them because they don't know what they've done while away. I really wish that in the US, we'd raise the age for enlistment to at lea…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 10:25 PM
16

She wasn't "forced" to apologize. A gun wasn't held to her head. She wasn't threatened with jail time. She's an adult. She decided to apologize. She should not have. She had nothing to apologize for. She's feeding stupidity.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:07 PM
6

I get the point you are trying to make, but read back your first sentence. If (and that's a big "if") feminism is about equality, then saying you're not a feminist would mean that you don't believe in equality. That is actually something someone should be criticized for. However, we know feminism is actually all over the map when it comes to equality, so saying you're not into feminism isn't actually saying you are against equality. And like you said, there's nothing she said that would suggest …
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:05 PM
2

Such as people saying that a 12-year-old boy "wanted it" from his twenty-something teacher. Or Joe Rogan making a joke out of it. Or rape not even being included in the legal definition for some people. I know you know this.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:46 PM
-5

You are on a men's right sub. Take a look around. Look at your own comments. Tell me again how we all hate men and love women so much. You're in some weird dark place. Hate isn't in our genes. This is a shitty Wikipedia article supported by pseudo-science that is two decades old. I loved my dad. When I think of him, there's nothing but positive. And dude, gay guys and straight women exist, so there's a shit-ton of man-love going on. So relax.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 06:05 AM
0

This is one woman making a stupid joke on Facebook. And the answer to your question is pretty simple. Men buy the drinks. This is a self-inflicted wound.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:55 AM
4

Please tell me this is a troll. /r/askfeminism has 11 subscribers and hasn't had a new post in the last 6 months. /r/twoxchromosomes isn't even a feminist sub. It's a default filled with "relationship issues" that make most feminist's skin crawl. The top post right now is from a woman who is embarrassed that her bf knows she poops, for Christ's sake. And tumblr? Are you seriously trying to have an intelligent conversation with someone on tumblr? You haven't been trying to communicate with "the v…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:43 AM
5

Gotcha, thanks.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:03 AM
11

It's weird, right? Actors are paid to look good while playing pretend. Why do I need to know their political leanings?
/r/MensRights03/01/15 05:02 AM
6

I have no idea what you mean by this. Please explain.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 04:53 AM
1

That one sentence almost gave my brain whiplash. It's like she doesn't even know what words mean.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:03 AM
2

I agree, but I'm personally not inclined to trust that her descriptions of him are accurate.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 01:01 AM
-1

I'm not seeing where this has anything to do with a "feminist movement". She's just an asshole as far as I can tell. Does she use the "feminist movment" as cover somewhere for her being an asshole? (Because that would make her even more of an asshole.)
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:52 AM
3

This sounds a bit like you're saying that women innately lack self control, which would imply that each individual woman (and this woman in particular) is biologically less culpable for her actions. I don't buy that. She didn't cheat because she is female. She cheated because she is an asshole. She chose to disregard the feelings of another human being whom she claims to love in order to satisfy her own curiosity. She then chose to brag about not having any regrets online. She, individually, is …
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:48 AM
1

She is arguing that colleges should have the same standards of evidence as criminal trials even though colleges are not equipped to handle physical evidence. That seems like more madness to me. Colleges should not be in the business of holding criminal trials.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:28 AM
0

The response has been madness, but I'm not terribly excited about what this article had to say. College campuses should not be in the business at all of trying these cases. That is the fundamental problem. But let's ignore this fundamental problem for a minute and talk about the standard which this article claims is the problem. "Preponderance of evidence" is a civil court standard. It's not some outlandish and unheard of thing that the article is making it out to be. If your neighbor chops down…
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:22 AM
7

To anyone who doesn't already know, The Daily Mirror is famously a crap-tastic sensationalist rag. Yes, it contains misandristic BS. But it also contains misogynistic BS and racist BS and transphobic BS and homophobic BS. BS is what they do. Facts and reason are occasionally used as props. You can take them seriously if you want, but they are a joke. And everyone else knows it. So, just FYI, if you go around using The Daily Mirror as your evidence that journalism is anti-male, you are likely to …
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:45 PM
8

This is The Daily Mirror. Sensationalism not fit for ass-wiping is their bread and butter. You don't need to waste your energy challenging their journalistic integrity because everyone knows they have none. Starting your rant by referring to the woman's looks is not helpful. How she looks is irrelevant and a distraction. Commenting on it just dilutes your message, unless your point really is that men's rights means having the right to punch women we find unattractive in the face. The real point …
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:29 PM
6

I don't really understand why being male and/or a feminist would imply you are one to bash people at all, blindly or otherwise. So that seems like a really strange thing to declare straight out of the gate. Also, if you really are a feminist, you should already be aware of many injustices men face. Women do not have equal status in the military in that their combat roles are limited and they do not register with Selective Services. This is unjust to women, but it is also unjust to men, for reaso…
/r/MensRights02/01/15 04:44 AM
2

This is a good point. I think sometimes we worry so much about how to say the important things that we don't say anything at all. I'm going to remember this the next time I'm fumbling for words.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:50 PM
3

I agree it's awkward, but I think you kind of have to go there to get past the societal BS of men not being able to talk about how they're feeling without being judged less of a man.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:49 PM
2

I personally don't like the "man-" thing, but I can get over it if it helps raise awareness and gets some men seeking the help they need.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:42 PM
-3

Well, that will never work. They didn't even use the word "bitch" once! And they neglected to point out that the enemy are probably "childless"! How is that supposed to help?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:36 PM
21

"There's a reason why a lot of people don't want to work on a building site. It's physically demanding. A lot more people could do it but why would you stand out in the rain for 12 hours a day?" I changed two words, and suddenly it's as if men too have feelings and can experience discomfort and pain.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:28 PM
-20

How about people just stop being asshats who engage in harassment?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:24 PM
1

Could someone explain what the fuck being childless has to do with anything and why it's in the title?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:19 PM
16

Schools should not be holding pseudo-trials and handling criminal complaints. They aren't equipped to do it and they have a long history of fucking it up.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:16 PM
1

Are you claiming that feminism is established throughout the entire political spectrum?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:14 PM
1

Feminism Some versions of feminism are very obviously sexist. Some very obviously aren't. And others are somewhere in between. It's like asking if Republicanism is racist or if Christianity is bigoted. Some forms are. Some forms aren't.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:10 PM
4

I've got my pitchfork ready, but there really isn't enough detail in this article.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:02 PM
3

Here is a little more. It says that she was also a victim of abuse from the father.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 11:00 PM
10

How is it that the boys not even knowing how to dress or eat means the mother is most responsible for their neglect? I may be misunderstanding what you are saying, but it seems to be implying that fathers aren't responsible for teaching their children how to dress or eat.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:56 PM
4

This is a shitty article. Where in the article does it actually answer the question posed? All you need is the stats, a percentage maybe. Instead, the author talks about a few specific cases and calls it a day.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:29 PM
27

I have some expertise in this area. Those are definitely women, not girls.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:19 PM
3

he thinks colleges might try allowing only sororities—not fraternities—to hold alcohol-fueled soirees. “That would mean that there would be women at the door, and they would decide if you were ‘gentlemanly’ enough and trustworthy enough to come into the party,” he says. You're joking, right? How the fuck is this men's rights?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:17 PM
230

It's weird that someone can get offended by having their own words quoted back at them. It makes you realize that there are literally no words that don't offend them.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:10 PM
2

A better title would be "TYT university is an incredibly hypocritical YouTube show". There's no reason we need to jump to hyperbole or try to wrangle all of us to agree on something that we can't possibly determine is true. There are more videos on YouTube than any of us can watch in our lifetime.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:02 PM
2

Through these conversations, he explores the common question: what is going wrong with many men and boys in our society? That does not sound promising.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 06:55 PM
2

Very well said. I actually believe that gay marriage will be of benefit in this area because the law will suddenly have to contend with situations in which neither party has an advantage due to gender bias.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:18 AM
3

You are saying that all married men either purposefully enter into an arrangement that is worthless to them or that they are deluded into thinking the arrangement benefits them in some way when it in fact doesn't. This seems to imply you think all married men are idiots, which I strongly disagree with. You personally do not see the benefit. That's fine. But to assume that you know what all men find of value is a bit presumptuous.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:11 AM
14

Except that the power dynamic is often reversed in courts of law. It's reversed when it comes to parenting. It's reversed when it comes to being victims of violence and sexual abuse. And it's convenient that she says "sexism against men" because she can ignore the rape of boys by women and the jailing and abuse of a 15-year-old boy based on false rape claims.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:02 AM
1

I have a picture of myself smiling while I'm holding a vial containing a kidney stone that makes me wince every time I look at it. So I don't know. Maybe he wanted this picture for the same reason I wanted mine. If so, there are many expletives behind that smile.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:56 AM
2

Why do people making this argument always have to fuck it up at the end? "It's bullshit that they are calling any criticism of women misogyny. Oh, and by the way, we shouldn't have a female president until this stops." Thanks. That really helps make the argument that not everything is misogyny and that women are being judged individually and on their own merits.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:27 AM
1

This is disgusting. That poor kid. I've been reading through his AMA in pieces. I keep having to take a break to walk it off. The part where he describes running into his accuser a couple times is heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:19 AM
-1

I hear what you're saying, but you are bending the word "directly" beyond all recognition. Lobbying is "the act of attempting to influence decisions made by officials". So it is indirect by definition.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:11 AM
6

This is just horrible. It's just so ridiculous on so many levels. "Rape" is not a loose, subjective term. It's an actual crime that people get sent to prison for. And no, "If I didn't violate her, could I have?" and "Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?" are not good questions. That's insanity. Using this logic, we should have loose, subjective definitions of murder too. That way, the falsely accused can have the pain of self-exploration with questions like "If I didn't murd…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 05:07 AM
2

If you really want to help the cause, turn down the crazy dial about ten notches. I have no idea why you brought the commentator's Jewishness into it unless you yourself are some kind of bigot. And the whole "bathing in male tears" and mindless repetition of the word "toxic" is so far over the top, it's really hard to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:49 AM
11

Personally, I feel that not only should rapists be prevented from pursuing child support from their victims, they should also have the offspring taken away. Rapists, and particularly child rapists, are not fit parents. It's insane that we even have to point that out.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:35 AM
1

All these things fall under "men's rights" though. Men have the right to have emotions and not have arbitrary standards of masculinity pressed on them by society. So if you support men's rights, you should have known this already.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:29 AM
2

Dude, don't speak for me. It's emasculating. Just say, "I personally don't give a shit," and let me express the lack of shits I give.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:25 AM
1

This makes me so angry. How is it that a pedophile and rapist is a suitable parent for a child? How does this make any sense at all? If they're concerned about the welfare of the baby, shouldn't keeping it away from pedophilic rapists, preferably in a prison somewhere, be high on the list? But somehow the human evidence of her crime is reason she deserves clemency? It's just insane.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:13 AM
1

Who claims men's rights aren't a political issue? Do you mean they think it's a non-issue or that it isn't political?
/r/MensRights29/12/14 03:03 AM
2

He's a shitty comic giving female rapists cover by actually cheering on the molesting/rape of boys.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:54 AM
1

"I have a joke about it." Defending rapists because they happen to be female is pathetic. He says it's not even possible.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:50 AM
2

Feminism means different things to different people, just like how some people think using the words "bitch" and "whore" has something to do with defending men's rights. To some, feminism really does mean equality. So it can mean a man's right to parent and express emotions (without being called a "pussy" or told to "man up") just as much as it means a woman's right to work and be confident (without being called a "bitch" or a "whore"). Shitty misandristic, transphobic feminism exists and benefi…
/r/MensRights28/12/14 07:02 PM
1

Could someone point me to the part described in the title about women being naturally superior to men? I searched for "superior" but nothing came up.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:58 AM
2

This post seems to be making an argument based on historical facts. Those sorts of arguments usually include at least one link or citation.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:54 AM
2

Is this sub transphobic? Because I'm not really into that noise. I'm into equal rights, not shitting on people who already have enough shit to deal with.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:44 AM
-1

How are "bitch" and "man" perfect companions? Is "man" offensive to you? Go ahead and use it though if you want to completely undermine whatever point you're trying to make.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:37 AM
21

I don't support gendered days.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 02:27 AM
9

That's a good general rule. It saves time too because you don't have to check a persons genitals to determine whether to offer them respect.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 09:01 AM
0

It's the crazies of any group that yell the loudest, drowning out the sane voices. I have to keep reminding myself that tons of caring, thoughtful, tolerant Christians/Muslims/Jews/atheists exist because it's the batshit crazy ones who get in your face.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:58 AM
1

SJW?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:49 AM
1

This sub is for defending men's rights (not human rights) from being infringed upon. It says so in the sidebar.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:48 AM
4

They don't even keep stats on how many people were killed by police, so I doubt they worry about recording warnings. And if they did, I'm sure we'd have heard about the disparities by race by now.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:38 AM
1

He agreed with you and then said "also not", so now you're agreeing with him? If you were the cop that stopped him, you probably would have ended up giving yourself a ticket. Seriously though, I'd prefer actual stats to "this one woman I know says it happened".
/r/MensRights27/12/14 08:32 AM
2

Tips make all the difference, which is why the disparity matters.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:06 AM
1

What happened to the "common ground" thing?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 03:01 AM
3

I'll break it to them gently. "Dude, there's no such thing as Jewish atheist. You're just white now. It's like a promotion."
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:50 AM
2

Guess what stock image they chose to go along with the caption "Victims of domestic violence routinely have calls and texts secretly read". HINT: It's not a picture of someone secretly reading texts.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:35 AM
1

You should post this to subs like /r/gendercritical or /r/radicalfeminism to see what their reaction is.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:06 AM
4

I know tons of Jewish atheists. Besides being a religion, it is also a cultural heritage, so there isn't really a contradiction.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:02 AM
8

but we regularly don't argue consent when it comes to infants. After all, adults are properly in a position to decide what is in their best interests. Please explain why we have such a thing as "age of consent" then. Also, explain why Child Protective Services exist and why you believe that parents should be allowed to beat their children. Or if you don't, explain what part of your argument does not apply to beating a child.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:00 AM
5

Do you believe a parent should be allowed to cut off any piece of their baby's anatomy or just the pieces the baby might use a couple decades later for sex/masturbation?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:54 AM
7

No, it's not similar at all. Cutting off a piece of a baby's genitals is nothing at all like practices for preparing food. This comparison is ridiculous. If I think black people shouldn't have the right to vote, is that "similar" to my right to choose chocolate cake over vanilla?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:50 AM
6

I don't think there should be an exception for closely-held religious beliefs. Closely held by whom? The baby? A Jewish mom gets to cut off a piece of her baby son's penis because of her beliefs? Why do her beliefs trump her son's rights?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:47 AM
13

It's sad that this is groundbreaking and unprecedented.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 01:41 AM
9

It's crazy that urinating in public is considered a sexual offense in so many places. What kind of pervs find urination innately sexual?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 12:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter