TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Beej67 Archive

View 8 posts and 115 comments by Beej67 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

So 7% for the other interview set? I'd like to see the same thing run with men to see what the answers are.
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 04:46 PM
2

The study itself was a comparison between F2F interviews and computer assisted self-interviews. Has anyone looked at the body of the study to determine the differences between the title statistic when measured F2F and by the computer method?
/r/BlackPillScience19/02/21 04:36 PM
3

I'm of the impression that sugar baby websites are much more highly trafficked, and are probably on net much more damaging to the traditional relationship model, than onlyfans. I'd like to see some traffic and user comparison statistics on that. The other thing that we'll likely see that will crater onlyfans, is an influx of third world onlyfans accounts. If an American white woman can make $20k at it in a year, that's not much. If a Filipino lady in Manila can make the same, she can buy a house…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/20 08:23 PM
9

If you look at active android installs, the numbers are closer to 80/20.
/r/BlackPillScience14/04/20 02:18 PM
1

Well that's my problem. If I can get them on the date, and the date turns out to not be a woman who was lying on her profile, I can close the deal really well. As mentioned, I'm a good looking dude who speaks well. The problem is the wall itself. Landing that date. "Hey let's have drinks" "Ok let me check with my babysitters" <<RESOUNDING SILENCE>> lol It's really pretty funny. I got bent out of shape about it a little bit in the summer, but I just focused on stoicism and the fact that no possib…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 03:21 PM
5

This is great analysis. Thanks. Now the question arises .. where's a good place to target that demographic? edit: Although it would be hilarious to just stick "seeking girls with daddy issues" in a Tinder profile.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 03:02 PM
1

Daddy issues comment has a point, although I would target the upper-20s lower-30 range, simply because they've most likely ridden the cock carousel already and are approaching the wall - desperate. I'd love to target that range, but seriously, this ceiling is working just like The Wall but more egregious. You want her to know that you have options but choosing to pursue her because of time (not overtly of course). Yep. Noted.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 03:01 PM
1

Kids obviously come first. Not interested in remarrying - that would probably make my life much worse. I like being a single dad. Looking for a girlfriend, basically. And my situation is a tremendous outlier, I get that. It's a goofy one, though, and I'm fishing for advice for how to navigate it. I thought I could figure it out on my own, but I'm up against an analysis wall.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 02:59 PM
3

Someone should really start a subreddit called "r/latestagesocialjustice."
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:15 PM
4

This is the totem pole of oppression at work.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 07:15 PM
1

I was directed here from another sub. If this question is inappropriate, I'm happy to submit to moderated floggings. Reference: https://therationalmale.com/2012/06/04/final-exam-navigating-the-smp/?fbclid=IwAR2NUZKjZNYeflrPGS-E4VYL31mw5VrggIAOMNwzv-WCSsyyP-lUTwu0Ap4 In particular: Now class, if you’ll direct your attention to the display above (click on it for the larger version) I’ll explain the parameters of this graph. In the vertical column we have Sexual Market Value (SMV) based on the ubiq…
/r/BlackPillScience19/06/19 01:54 PM
1

You considering changing careers? Maybe open up a men only counseling center. Youd probably make bank in today's climate, where men can't trust their counselors.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 09:49 PM
1

mental health counsellor Do you think this is related to the new APA guidelines at all? Like, do you think the rest of the group has decided to push them and is rubbing you out because they don't think you'll get in line?
/r/MensRights12/03/19 12:48 PM
2

Holy shit. Thanks.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 10:56 PM
1

I thought she paid it. She's not poor. Her dad probably isn't either. (he did make some great films) Just wondering if anyone had a source on that bit of the image.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 02:16 PM
4

Source on Bourdain being the person who funded the payoff? I hadn't heard that piece of the puzzle.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:48 PM
3

I suppose my biggest criticism with your reasoning is the base assumption that individualism is the answer to structural and systemic inequality. I don't think I said that. I think there are certain systemic inequalities, which can be addressed individually on a case by case basis, such as what we see in the criminal justice system. There are definite inequalities inherent to our system which appear on the surface to be about race, but are in fact mostly tied to the heritability of wealth, which…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 05:39 PM
8

I saw you're getting downvoted here too, and I would request from the other MR folks on this sub to please not downvote your contributions to this thread, so they don't get washed out by reddit's mechanics. (I gave you an upvote for reaching out) I'd be happy to have an open dialog. For myself I think the standard definition of “prejudice” that (I presume) you are invoking is insufficient to understanding the ways in which racism against a black person and sexism against a man are not really com…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:20 PM
7

The standard Social Justice response to this (which I see below in the comments, actually) is going to be something of the form of the following: "Yes but men have privilege and black people don't, therefore it's okay to treat men differently than black people." Which goes back to how Social Justice has redefined prejudice itself in such a way that they get to weaponize it while others don't. This is a pretty good primer on how that works. You can't even have these conversations with Social Just…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:08 PM
4

It's plausible but marginally sketchy. Firm your own opinion, this is a generally middle of the road take: https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/01/why-cenk-uygur-is-getting-confronted-about-the-nam.html
/r/MensRights15/01/19 04:58 PM
1

Jordan Peterson might be up your alley.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 12:19 AM
7

Do you have a link to this study?
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:12 PM
1

Many of the people who call themselves feminist live in the motte and ignore the bailey.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 03:24 PM
1

Some fantastic work by the same author: https://quillette.com/2018/12/13/i-now-understand-how-nelson-mandela-felt/
/r/MensRights17/12/18 02:10 PM
0

I know men who have divorced shitty wives, and I also know women who have divorced really, really shitty husbands. I also know shitty couples who have divorced each other. There are shitty people all over the place, so be careful adopting an opinion without knowing all the facts.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:51 PM
2

The reason we have this disjunct, is the social justice academics stealth-changed the definition of sexism/racism in 1970.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 08:01 PM
3

That's what I'd do.
/r/MensRights28/11/18 12:31 PM
1

Bad title. Only one of the accepted articles was a Mein Kampf ripoff. They did do another Mein Kampf ripoff that got rejected for the fake white lesbian "author" trying to absolve herself of her whiteness. (not because the content was bad, apparently) google drive link with all articles and the reviews from the academic journals
/r/MensRights12/11/18 09:33 PM
2

It can get you a job promoting gender studies. But overall, it might ding his GPA while pursuing his real degree.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:35 PM
1

Sure.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 04:31 PM
2

Well, he could probably just ask the professor directly. "If I reference this text () will that adversely affect my grade?" It would be a good barometer, anyway.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 08:03 PM
3

also a source in Warren Farrell-The Myth of Male Power_ Why Men are the Disposable Sex" ​ This will almost assuredly earn him an F, given how the professor is approaching the material. I mean, it would be a brave hill to die on. But he might value his GPA over taking that stand. ​
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:40 PM
10

My final assignment is a research paper, and I plan to mainly focus on 3 things; False accusations against men, Men who have been raped, and Circumcision. You run a great risk of failing this class. My experience, from 1995: College freshman in a highly respected technical engineering university. "Intro to Literature and Language" was the name of the class, but the professor was a deep, deep third wave feminist, the kind to which we are all now familiar but I had never heard of back then. She th…
/r/MensRights07/11/18 07:37 PM
12

https://reason.com/blog/2018/11/07/midterm-voters-punished-anti-kavanaugh-d
/r/MensRights07/11/18 01:25 PM
1

Sometimes I think Jessica Valenti is actually a red pilled dude who started writing parody to see how far he can take it and still be taken seriously, and then discovered how lucrative it was.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 03:54 AM
4

me and another female commentator have said we didn't want to look messy. My wife said the same thing. "Who would clean up the mess?" Which is funny because I do most of the cleaning.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 05:28 PM
4

Male suicide outpaces female suicide 3:1. But in gun suicides, it's more like 7:1. Also, suicide rate in men does correlate with gun ownership rate, but suicide rate in women does not correlate with gun ownership rate. Article. That's not a case for gun control, necessarily, but it is definitely a case for better awareness and more responsible gun ownership. Short story: if you're a man who has thoughts of suicide, reach out to your family or a friend and have them hold on to your guns for a bit…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 01:17 PM
2

You're learning early that the key to navigating education is to tell the teacher what they want to hear. ​
/r/MensRights18/10/18 12:33 AM
10

Step 1: Never go to an unlicensed "holistic" therapist.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 12:39 PM
2

It's basically a restatement of the stuff in here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_Male_Power ..which is a MR staple.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:03 PM
1

I know the recommendation. I was curious as to why.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 12:35 PM
2

Why the age limit?
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:37 AM
4

I hope this blows over before my son is an adult. I can't in good conscience recommend that he get married, given the nonsense going on right now.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:17 AM
2

I'm not sure there's ever been a situation where you could roll it out in such a clean fashion. "According to a statement by our corporate lawyer, one of our board members identifies as female. Out of respect for her privacy, we refuse to disclose which one." Hamstering intensifies.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:33 PM
3

Just get one board member to identify as female. Then you pit the "women are underrepresented" crowd against the "gender is self identified" crowd, and you pop some popcorn. Then deal with whichever crowd survives the internal bloodbath.
/r/MensRights01/10/18 01:30 PM
7

https://www.designmom.com/twitter-thread-abortion/
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:36 PM
30

Go read that one too if you like. It was basically "hold your horses, fellow feminists, a bunch of the men's rights stuff is legit." References that documentary that the feminist filmmaker did on men's rights where she flipped her opinion on the whole thing, and then got shit from other feminists for switching sides or whatever.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:11 PM
1

Do you want vouchers? Because this is how you get vouchers.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 08:12 PM
1

Can you explain this word to me please?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:49 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/49o8a5/q_for_bp_on_consent_rape_patriarchy_and_such/ ?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 03:30 PM
1

I didn't remove or edit anything. So in your opinion, would this rephrased conclusion be correct: (?) "Therefore, logically, any man who has sex with any woman who (doesn't believe that patriarchal society brainwashes people) is automatically a rapist."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:56 PM
1

"(basically) All men are rapists" would be an internally consistent position, if I understand the premises properly. But if they don't think all men are rapists then I would like to understand which men they think aren't, and which errors in understanding I've made in the givens above.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:52 PM
1

"Consent policies" on campuses are also very different than a court of law. Some might contend that anything qualifying as "rape" should be something that cops and judges and juries and state law handle, but that's not what's happening on the ground in higher academia. In college, there's a kind of "soft rape" that is framed entirely around a far different "consent" burden than would stand in a court. I'm asking specifically about the "affirmative consent" burden being widely implemented by coll…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:41 PM
2

There is value in understanding the positions of other people, regardless whether you agree with those positions or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/16 02:26 PM
-1

As a (male) engineer who's married to an engineer, yes, society does need more women in STEM. For a lot of reasons, not the least of which is to close the wage gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/16 05:33 PM
1

People's happiness is inversely proportional to the amount of news they read/watch. Things are awesome right now if you don't listen to all the people telling you how horrible everything is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/16 12:38 AM
3

Lol. "Well, as long as the rampant miscarriage of justice isn't nationwide, it's totally fine."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/16 12:08 AM
5

Good statistics on this are going to be hard to come by, seeing how men don't call the cops when they get hit by a woman. Further confusing the issue, is that it's been clearly shown that women are not punished near as severely for identical crimes, women are not cited as much as men are by law enforcement with identical crimes, and women have less incentive to commit the crimes themselves. A poor woman does not rob a liquor store, she tells her man to rob a liquor store. Without collecting data…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 11:21 PM
1

No it's not. If I rank all apples 1-10 on their tastiness, I am not "lowering the tastiness of apples across the board." Nor am I stating that all apples are of no tastiness. I am merely applying a method to find the tastiest apple I can afford at the grocery store. If you happen to think that all apples taste the same, well then that's your prerogative. I happen to think that apples are unique, and because they are unique, some taste better than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 11:06 AM
1

It's not causal, but it does show the rather heavy correlation between extreme feminists opinions of sex and extreme evangelicals opinions of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/15 04:12 PM
2

Uh.. I'm not a Red Pill person per se, but I've read enough about it to realize that at its core, RP is a method to assign variable "worth" to women, not a way to assign a zero value to all women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:22 PM
6

You must be pretty low on the tree to begin with, if one-branch-down is hideously unfuckable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 02:20 PM
1

Both?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 06:35 AM
2

Define "better" here: The “it’s my nature” argument ignores is that being civilized, enjoying the benefits of a peaceful and civil society requires men and women to suppress their baser natures in favor of a better way of living.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 06:26 AM
2

Well here's the truth from all sides: 1) Nobody is 'entitled' to sex from anyone else, however, 2) If you don't fuck your spouse, someone else is going to fuck your spouse. If you have a spouse, you better either get comfortable with fucking them as much as they like to fuck, or get comfortable with the idea that someone else is going to fill that gap. And that goes one way as much as the other, gender-wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 09:03 PM
4

Yeah, no, the hippies were definitely all about enabling hedonism without entering a permanent obligation. The invention leading to hookup culture was not the smartphone, it was the condom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 05:40 PM
4

Hookup culture has existed since the 70s. Tinder is just an alcohol-free virtual bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:31 PM
4

I think perhaps half the comments I've made in this subreddit are about TRP/AWALT selection bias. I do think there's some validity to needsomehelp3211's comment that viewing all women as potential psychos is prudent just like viewing all guns as potentially loaded is prudent. In my experience, the dumber a girl is, the more likely she is to exhibit TRP's "AWALT" qualities. That TRP methodologies aren't used to chase smart women plays into their selection bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/15 03:30 PM
1

Heard from a buddy recently, when discussing how men don't actually like the runway model body type that women for some reason strive for: "I dated one of those model types once. It was like fucking a pillowcase full of antlers."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 03:35 PM
11

I'd chalk this up to RPSB - Red Pill Selection Bias. All women aren't "like that," but the ones TRP methodology has been developed to chase overwhelmingly are "like that."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 03:29 PM
1

In decades of dating I found one (1) single woman who wasn't manipulative, and then I married her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/15 03:26 PM
1

If only you knew how many bad sailors out there thought they were good sailors.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/15 06:04 PM
3

Oh hell no, I walked in heels once and it was terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 08:23 PM
1

Even if men did need 'mediums of advocacy,' we wouldn't use them, because advocacy is for wimps. Yeah, that's my gender role, but I'm proud of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:56 PM
1

Two of my greatest pre-marriage flings were with a Chilean girl and a Thai girl who's parents were from Pakistan. One of my greatest (sexual?) regrets is not getting with a black girl before I got married.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:54 PM
1

What are your rates for different services?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:49 PM
2

Also... ...some people prefer newer boats because they're fresher and haven't had a chance for much to break on them yet, but honestly the better boats are the older, more used boats because everything that might break has been replaced, and you know that the boat is tough enough to handle some deep, blue water sailing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:43 PM
1

Also, you can have a lot of fun on a little sailfish or a catamaran, but bigger boats are totally better. Unless they're so big you can't fit them in your anchorage. That sucks, and is a big pain in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:40 PM
3

I think it's a lot like sailing. You can become a pretty damn good sailor if you only own one boat and you don't sail on any other boats, but when you jump onto a different boat, things are going to be different and your experience isn't totally applicable. The best sailors are really good at sailing lots of boats because they have not only a length of experience, but a breadth of experience. That said, if I've owned my boat for a decade, I will know how to sail my boat a lot better than even an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:39 PM
19

I (male) got catcalled by some gay dudes once. No, actually twice. It really wasn't that bad, honestly. (Just doing my bit for equality of the sexes or whatever.)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/15 07:19 PM
1

Interesting choice of words. "Lost ground" is a competitive phrase, not a cooperative phrase. I'm sure you can see where that goes, in your mental construct that "all competition is masculine" and "all masculinity is bad."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 03:25 PM
1

What's a "3rd waver?"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 03:16 PM
1

So I tried to scan the thread, isolate posters who appear to firmly hold viewpoints broadly understood to be feminist, and synthesize their opinions. Here's what I've got: "Masculinity is not bad" (33%) - Sara2015jackson, Midnightvulpine, Rapunzelly. "Toxic masculinity is bad" (55%) - Belletaco, Steelchicken, Happysinglewoman, TELLMEHOWYOUFEEL, Terminator3456. "All masculinity is bad" (11%) - CursedLemon This question would make some really fascinating social science research.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:42 PM
1

No True Scotsman?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:27 PM
1

"Willingness to cooperate" in war, genocide, or slavery, is not an innate human trait. But those activities heavily benefit those in power, so the powerful use absolutist rhetoric (largely in the form of nationalism or religion) to manipulate the (less powerful) into participating in those activities. They also use absolutist rhetoric to manipulate the public into participating in a whole host of other activities. The powerful do not respect the powerless. That is the fundamental problem of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:26 PM
1

Is there more than one way to peel a banana?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 12:13 PM
2

Except I was talking about action as driven by an innate urge And now you're moving the goalposts to maintain your gambit of assigning inherently bad behavior to masculinity by definition, and then pointing to that bad behavior as evidence that masculinity is bad. Which is fine, whatever. Doesn't fundamentally matter to me. How many feminists see masculinity like you do? 15%? More? Less?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 09:20 PM
2

Then there's your answer to your 'circular logic' question. You have defined an action (controlling others) as bad, and also defined that same action as masculine, and then you use those definitions to "prove" masculinity is bad. That's Begging The Question by its very definition: a circular argument in which the conclusion is included in the premise. I challenge your definition that "controlling others" is masculine. I make claim that the action is not masculine, the action is gender neutral. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:49 PM
2

Deny or affirm the following first: Women throughout history (have / have not) used their "feminine wilds," to: Intimidate, Manipulate, Abuse, or Control?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:29 PM
1

Can you give me an example of what you'd consider "toxic femininity?" Is my attempt at an example above reasonable?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:26 PM
2

Which was the whole point of my question, belletaco. From the responses here, pretending for the sake of argument that the respondents are appropriately representative and also a reasonable sample size, I'd guess maybe 15% of feminists think masculinity is inherently bad. Particularly if they go so far as to label simple stoicism to be "toxic." Now I realize this thread can't possibly be an adequate sample size, but it's better than nothing. Do you think 15% is high or low?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:22 PM
2

I think it's kinda dumb to try and attribute it more to one than the other. It's impossible to compete against a team if you're an individual. It's impossible to form a successful team out of people who have no interest in competition. Human society needs both, and you can't determine which one is more "important" in any quantitative way, simply because there's no measuring stick. So the whole argument is dumb on both sides from the onset.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:19 PM
1

It most certainly does. You'll notice of the tens of thousands of religions that spread across the globe as recently as 2000 years ago, the only ones left are based in some way on the golden rule. That's societal natural selection at work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:16 PM
3

This is circular logic. You say masculinity is bad by defining masculinity with bad traits, and then point to those traits to prove its badness. You say femininity is good by defining femininity with good traits, and then point to those traits to prove its goodness. It is a disingenuous approach to the topic. Do you deny that women have throughout history used their "feminine wilds," for lack of a better word, to: Intimidate, Manipulate, Abuse, or Control? I do not deny men have used their mascu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:13 PM
1

I think Dietyz has a very salient point that you're missing. Recorded history is primarily comprised of the powerful bullying the powerless (or simply "less powerful") into cooperating to achieve the goals set by the powerful. Which, usually, is to expand and entrench their own power. Occasionally it is to support the masses, but only in as much as strengthening the powerless achieves the goals of the powerful. And the social contract stuff is just a new and interesting smokescreen to keep the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 08:05 PM
4

Yes. And the reason why liking something traditionally masculine would make one uncomfortable, is because that shit is pushed at us all the time. He doesn't like it because it's pushed on him. He likes it because its fun. According to the article, his unease does not come from the activity, it comes from the masculine connotations of the activity.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 07:52 PM
1

I'm not either. I'm new around here. I'm still not fully hip on the lingo. Hell, this thread is the most I've ever done on Reddit. I think TRP has some very interesting things to say. I think much of what the feminists call 'toxicity' over there is a result of them applying a kind of abbreviated scientific method to a poorly selected sample. They gather information about a specific subset of women, which I'd characterize as "dumb sexy ditzes," and then extrapolate their findings to the whole. I …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 07:27 PM
6

The author didn't get discomfort from being pushed to grill. He got discomfort from the idea that he might like something masculine. He says so himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 07:18 PM
1

Holy smokes, "bottling it up" is considered toxic? "Bottling it up" is an essential life skill for anyone participating in many professions traditionally taken by men, which women are now sliding into. For: Fireman / Policeman / Infantry / Sailor ..and many others, the inability to 'bottle it up' can be deadly. Simply being the head of household in a dangerous area, or during dangerous times, requires you to 'bottle it up' for the safety of your family. If women want to push more into these role…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 07:15 PM
9

I wholeheartedly disagree. You're told that liking sports is integral to masculinity all the time. You might not notice since you agree with the message, but as someone who disagrees with it and gets bludgeoned with it every time he watches TV, or every time he sees a movie which claims to represent "normal guys", trust me, it's there. We are absolutely told that liking sports is a masculine thing. This is 100% correct. So if I were to like sports, but "be uncomfortable liking sports," because l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:33 PM
5

My concern is not that the dude is conflicted. My concern is the source of the conflict. I can think of no natural reason to be conflicted over grilling out, unless someone was a vegetarian. That he's conflicted appears, by his own admonition, to be the result of exposure to rhetoric. Rhetoric that states, apparently explicitly, that masculinity is bad. I want to know what ratio of feminists carry the same opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:30 PM
5

I'm not a huge adherent to TRP, as I mentioned before. But I wonder why you use the term "forcing" instead of "choosing." If a woman chose to adopt the gender role of a stay at home mom, would that be toxic femininity? If not, what would be the cross-gender analogy? Perhaps, an otherwise intelligent woman choosing to act like a ditz in order to draw suitors, and then playing them against each other? Would that be "toxic femininity?"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:26 PM
2

Is femininity fine when it's used to intimidate, manipulate, abuse, or control people in their everyday lives?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:16 PM
2

femininity is nurturing, and masculinity is violent What would you say to the idea that femininity is nurturing, and masculinity is protective?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:14 PM
2

BP and feminist can mingle, but they don't always. Can you explain the difference to me? I mentioned before I'm new to this pill business.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 06:11 PM
4

Honest question - Why would creation be gender neutral but destruction be chromosome dependent? Explain like I'm five. I'm new to this whole pill debate thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:36 PM
9

I thought so too at first, but I read it a couple of times and I can't find the punch line.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:21 PM
8

I don't know who Roosh is, and I don't doubt you could, but I'm not trying to checkmate anyone. I'm trying to get a gauge on feminist opinions of masculinity in general. Today is the first time I've heard the "toxic" distinction. Where is that line drawn, in your opinion, and do you think your opinion holds with the majority of modern feminists?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:20 PM
3

Do you think the author of the article feels like grilling vegetables is toxic masculinity? If not, why do you suppose he is ashamed of grilling vegetables?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:17 PM
4

Belletaco, would you mind speculating on why the man in the article feels ashamed of his masculinity? I don't believe in absolutes. I hate the "AWALT" thing, for instance, and I take your response to be a bit of a NAFALT. Not sure if that's a real acronym but whatever. Regardless, it appears to me that at least the feminists who have influenced the author are in fact like that, by evidence in the article. What ratio of feminists, would you say, believe men should be ashamed of masculinity?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:16 PM
3

So, CursedLemon, as the OP I'd like to ask you a direct question. Do you believe that the world would be a better place if all men were, for lack of a better word, "emasculated?" Followup question, what ratio of feminists do you believe hold the same opinion as yourself? Be honest. I'm not trying to argue. As a man who enjoys my masculinity, I'm just trying to gauge the depth of this belief within the feminist movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/15 03:11 PM
0

I blame Japanese porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/15 02:40 AM
1

I'm relatively new to the Great Pill War of the 21st century, having only really discovered these subs over the past month, and I'm still pretty slow to pick up on the terminology. My take on TRP is there's a selection bias in play here that TRPers don't fully realize. No, in truth, NAWALT. However, the sexy ditzy sublcass of women absolutely ARE "like that." So if your goal is to score that sexy ditzy subclass, then TRP dating strategy is very applicable, and very effective. And I could totally…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 05:37 PM
2

What's actually bad: ... Skipping leg day
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/15 04:01 PM
2

I don't see how the red pill guys can make that claim, when the evidence is clearly to the contrary, at least in terms of what women want in a man. High School girls want a man who's popular, College girls want a man that's hot, 20s women want a man that's successful, 30s women want a man that's stable, 40s women want a man who likes them, 50s + I have no real data on. If anything, it's men who stop evolving, at least in terms of their relationship desires. Men of every age want a woman who is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 06:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter