TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BellaBlack Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by BellaBlack on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

In a few years the men of Sweden will have sex changes at birth to stop male privilege. Like music to my ears. Well, does it really matter? A little political correctness isn't so bad, they're just trying to get away from racism, which is a good thing. It'll even out in the end.
/r/PussyPass23/06/14 04:00 PM
1

As a feminist (dun-dun-dun), although I love OITNB this has bothered me too. I think there's a little too much "victim of circumstances" and sob stories behind the main characters. I guess the point is that criminals are people too, which they are, but I'm guessing there are a lot of pure assholes in prison as well. Then again, OITNB is a pretty easy-going show to begin with while Oz generally seem darker, so that's probably a reason too.
/r/PussyPass23/06/14 02:54 PM
1

You form opinions without evidence, and ignore evidence that we give in response to your questions I wasn't forming any opinion, I was questioning the logic behind his statement an got a few reasonable replies, which I replied to. And evidence? If most statistics availible say the same thing, you can't really blame people for basing their opinion on that. I said it seems to be that way as far as I know - not exactly a way to express a radical opinion. So basically, I tried having a conversation …
/r/MensRights21/04/14 05:16 PM
-5

I see your point, I didn't imagine these women to consider men useless, just.. annoying to be around, sort of.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:40 AM
3

just how violent MOST* males are They weren't even that violent to begin with?
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:04 AM
-2

Well, this isn't really relevant since we're talking about the safety of people keeping a society safe. I mean, soldiers and police officers obviously put their life at risk trying to make the world a safe place, but fighting SIDS isn't going to put you in any danger.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:42 PM
-2

Well, agree about what? It wasn't a statement, just a question. And a perfectly reasonable one I think. I get that that's how it is today, but it doesn't answer my question. If women really were to create their own society, wouldn't they at least try to do the dirty work? I mean, I doubt that women who would want to create a new society simply imagine it full of academics only, and then they'd suddenly stand there wondering why it isn't working. That's how it sounds when SporkTornado described i…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:31 PM
-6

But as I said, that kind of warfare is a lot less common today. I'm not saying women can't start a war, I'm just saying it isn't very likely to happen since most democracies actively try not to do that anymore. So unless they place their society next to Russia or something, there won't really be any great threat from the outside, and no soldiers would be necessary. I don't know how realistic it is, that's why it's a question.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 11:10 PM
-3

What? You mean about war? Well, there's plenty written about the so called democratic peace theory, although it isn't undisputed of course. But it's a thing it seems.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:38 PM
-1

Not even when it comes to fatal violence? I'm under the impression that more men than women kill other people.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 10:27 PM
-11

In a society with only women, wouldn't women simply be doing the disgusting jobs? Also, war between democracies isn't at all common, and as far as I know women seem less prone to (at least fatal) violence. When you consider this, wouldn't it therefor be a lot less dangerous to devote your life to keep the society safe? Not saying it would be a utopia, just that it doesn't have to fail because of the reasons you mentioned. Edit: As usual, questions aren't welcomed on mensrights. And you guys comp…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:18 PM
1

Feminists will also tell you that a patriarchy can co-exist with men being discriminated. They're not mutually exclusive. I mean, you don't have to believe it exists at all, fine, but even if you don't I think one should understand the reasoning behind it. And more importantly, I think most feminists would agree that this isn't right and that women raping men should be illegal.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:02 PM
0

I don't know what you mean by that, but I think most modern feminists and women in general would not relate to her at all. As I said, this is just conservative religious values that has nothing to do with feminism, at least not where I live since feminist here would go crazy over something like that.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:12 PM
-2

As I said, this has nothing to do with feminism, because no feminist would ever agree with anything she said. Ever. Not because it doesn't "suit" them, but because it's fucking retarded and it goes against everything that feminism stands for. You basically found the most twisted "feminist" out there, and I think it's a waste of energy focusing on her because 99% of people identifying as feminists would not agree with her.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 02:58 PM
0

Feminism doesn't just fight for civil rights though, and this is not what "feminism has come to". Not every issue is equally big and important, but it is always important to point out sexism when we see it. It doesn't mean that those issues are now the most important thing to feminism though. Also, as someone from Scandinavia, this seems very much like conservative moralism. Girls had yoga-pants when I grew up and no one cared.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:11 PM
-1

This isn't new femnism or any feminism at all. It's a load of conservative bullshit based on religious values, saying casual sex is "undignified" and shaming female sexuality. I mean, "women civilize men, it's what we're supposed to do"? I don't even know how to respond to that but it makes me want to claw her eyes out.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:54 PM
-6

Well, according to the law, it actually means exactly that, because it clearly says that it isn't considered discrimination if there is a just cause. According to other definitions than what they use, maybe it is, but I'm not sure I'd take wikipedia's definition of it over the law. And anyway, what's the harm? If it's for a good cause.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:33 PM
0

According to wikipedia? The swedish law about discrimination says it isn't discrimination if it has a "just cause", and I'm guessing that trying to establish equality is considered as such.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:18 PM
-4

You're taking it out of context. If it was a hospital looking to hire male nurses for the same reasons, it would probably be just as fine. Having a bias for gender isn't automatically discrimination, for example if if the purpose is to actually counter discrimination or gender inequality.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 08:03 PM
-7

There are probably plenty of "the best" people and they aren't just looking for competence, they're looking to improve the whole work-environment, as it seems. Also, recently there was some sort of study on the news in Sweden saying that having a quota for women tend to force men to be more competent themselves, because men have to step up their game more and not rely on their gender (or something like that) - maybe they picked up on that. And, I'm not sure it counts as discrimination to want to…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:39 PM
1

Even she? Feminism in general doesn't stand by statements like that I think, since we've spent decades debating bullshit "biotruths", such as the "violent nature of men". Or is that only in Scandinavia? The way I see it, feminism if anything has been trying to dismantle the typical male gender role, saying aggression isn't nature but society, and so on. And the resistance has been enormous, mostly from men arguing about testosterone and whatnot.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:24 PM
0

Not if you mean "support" as in openly and fully supporting something. How do you know they are exceptions? Also, saying there is no pattern of excusing rape is bullshit, there has been plenty of research done on how people think about rape. People excuse rape (as in saying it's not as much rape, or not rape at all) if the woman is drunk, etc etc. So if you're going to say it doesn't exist, you're going to have to back that up.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 09:12 PM
-1

men looking at scantily clad women is called "rape culture" because rape culture is supposed to mean the presumed availability of a person's body to anyone else for sex No. Just no. Rape culture is a culture that in many cases excuse rape and other kinds os sexual violence, and in some ways, contribute to rape. It is not and has never been about men looking at naked women.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:18 PM
-4

No one has ever said a rape culture supports rape. Rape culture is not a culture that think rape is ok. If you think so, you haven't been paying attention. Rape culture is a culture that, although condemning rape, in many cases also excuse it and other kinds of sexual violence, and in some ways, contribute to rape.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 08:15 PM
1

I'm sorry you had to go through that, hope you two managed to sort it out. Also, it bothers me that men seem to think all women are against them in this area, when they're really not. The tone in this discussion is always really defensive towards women.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 11:42 PM
1

I wouldn't call it oppression, but one thing that bothers me is how society/people can't get the hell out of our vaginas. Fortunately, were I live abortion is legal and there isn't even any debate about it (yay Sweden). BUT, women still can't screw around how they want to or wear what they want to, without it being a problem. Sure, we have the right to do it and theoretically we could just let haters be haters, but it doesn't work since you're constantly reminded of their presence. Basically, I …
/r/MensRights10/07/13 02:53 PM
1

What about all the old, rich men who still have tons of young women? If a man is rich, he can be butt fucking ugly and still get a gorgeous girl, I mean, this happens all the time? And it's not just gold-diggers that do this. Statistics show that a man with a not-so-manly-money-making job (like nurse) has the least chance of getting married. Why? Because status is important to most women to some extent.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 12:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter