TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BeneficialCarob5164 Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by BeneficialCarob5164 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Fellow Brazillian here, I have been trying to find this link for a while now, thank you for this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/09/23 08:28 PM
1

"Circumcision prevents cancer and diseases" Cutting a arm off can prevent it from ever breaking.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 04:30 PM
1

I think that they may double down and say it's different somehow, maybe this is just my cynicism talking though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 05:21 PM
1

and that every time a guy wants to fight back that makes them more guilty. This seems like the usage of the kafka trap fallacy on their part: "A Kafka trap is a fallacy where if someone denies being x it is taken as evidence that the person is x since someone who is x would deny being x."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 05:13 PM
2

My guess is because women do parasuicide (i.e, a cry for help with no aim to actually die) more, while men try ssa (serious suicide attempt, where the intent is to achieve death) more: https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-017-1398-8
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 05:06 PM
1

What I mean is that even when you control for factors like suicide methods men still try to kill themselves more, it doesn't matter if you look only into the rate of non-lethal methods (with the exception of drowning) because men still try suicide more, therefore the idea that women try more (if you ignore the lethal methods rate) is bullshit. This one is the study I was talking about https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21937122/ ​ This one is a study that shows that men try ssa (serious suicide att…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/23 04:37 PM
1

It's almost as if women's choice of methods have nothing to do with "more empathy and kindness."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 06:20 PM
1

There is a very good post done by u/problem_redditor where he explains that mgm is in fact comparable with the most common types of fgm (the most severe type o fgm that people think happens more actually represents the minority of the cases): https://www.reddit.com/u/problem_redditor/comments/qid7gk/comment/hvhzql0/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 ​ He also gives a plausible explanation as to why people automaticaly assume that one is worse than the other in most cases.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/23 06:15 PM
2

How dare them, what a bunch of monsters indeed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 10:22 PM
9

A study who picked common suicide methods (lethal and non-lethal) and separated them by categories found out that men tried to kill themselves at higher rates at every single one of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 07:11 PM
4

They could also be more likely to kill themselves effectively because they are more likely to find themselves on situations that makes they genuinely want to die, it's almost like these people try to avoid this conclusion as much as possible. ​ I personally think that it's not that they don't care, it's just that their only options is to stay alive enduring what is essentialy hell for 50+ years, use a non-violent method and have a much greater risk of failure (which could mean having to live thr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 07:02 PM
13

The fact they say things like that about men who reached a point in their lives that is so low that they are willing to go against one their most fundamental instincts says a lot, even when men are at the verge of suicide they will somehow try to distort it to make men monsters. They would rather try to demonize men even in death instead of showing empathy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 06:51 PM
1

"I'll leave people more well-versed in coverture law talk about it. But it's not a simple 'he owns her'." Here's a little something that I found that supports the idea the it wasn't a black and white kind of deal where women were only property without any rights and nothing more, skip to myth 2: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/edyrf5/a_compilation_of_evidence_debunking_feminist/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 07:58 PM
1

That sounds like a very quick way of getting yourself killed, specially on my country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 09:22 PM
1

One thing that I would like to had, weren't most villains and antagonists on movies also men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 06:31 PM
1

I thought that it was a system where men have all the power and privileges at the expense of women, or at least that's what google and feminists (both male and female) told me. Also if that's the true definition wouldn't it be more accurate to say "all it means is that the very people at the top, and the ones who made major decisions were 0.1% of the population of men" to make it more clear that men in general (i.e the vast majority of us) didn't have power back then and do not have power now?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/23 06:11 PM
1

So if you switch the genders of the people with power things will magically get better on their point of view?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 07:32 PM
1

That's just your experience... All that you just said can also be chalked up to this, specially your point about teachers since you yourself addmited that most teachers are women, also if his (or her or whatever) personal experiences can't be used to as proof that women as a class have all the power then your personal experiences also can't be used as proof that men as class have all the power. " Same for most dangerous behaviors that teenagers do including sex and dangerous driving. It's always…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/23 06:00 PM
1

Doesn't all of the ways that men in power go over men who are underneath them prove that we don't live in a system that favours men in detriment of women (because if we did all of what you talked about wouldn't happen)? If anything all you talked about would prove that the men in power couldn't care less about men that are underneath them but care a lot more about the women who are underneath them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 11:03 PM
1

Ok, don't call a guy who was robbed at gun point by black criminals multiple times a racist if he doesn't like being around and avoids black people then, also please don't call a man who doesn't like being around and avoids women because he was a victim of domestic violence in the hands women multiple times a misogynistic, I can understand your point but I still think it would be hypocritical on your part if you called them out on what they are doing (since how you feel because of what happened …
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:28 PM
1

ya dude but most of the homicides are also BY men. You're sounding awfully similar to how white supremacists sound when someone mentions how many black people are killed each year (spoiler, they also go "they are killed by other black so fuck it who cares"), but let's ignore that for now, here is a cool idea: go ask the families of these dead people if the fact that they possessed the same genitals as their killers changes anything for them, ask them if the pain of knowing that their loved ones …
/r/MensRights29/06/23 08:03 PM
1

Women are half of the population and were in much more contact which children (they needed to be raised and all) for most of history and even today, not to mention the influence they can have on men's behaviour given their need for female validation, do you really think that they not even once contributed for the continued existence of these stereotypes despite being half of the population in all of the 250000 years that humans have existed? Also as a last question, do you think that slut shamin…
/r/MensRights29/06/23 07:51 PM
1

Of course WW have flexed their powers and abused it. If you are a WM, you are not one to talk. WM who historically have had a lot of power and privilege and still even now, their dealings the world, we don’t need to go into all the details or that conversation, do we. "Of course WW have flexed their powers and abused it. If you are a WM, you are not one to talk. WM who historically have had a lot of power and privilege and still even now, their dealings the world, we don’t need to go into all th…
/r/AllPillDebate25/06/23 10:51 PM
1

Do you think something can be considered a perk that a entire demographic can enjoy from if only a tiny fraction of the people of said demographic can actually use it as a advantage?
/r/AllPillDebate25/06/23 10:38 PM
1

"White male perks, power, wealth and influence mogs that of white women and anyone for that matter. We are supposed to pretend otherwise, eh." "To pretend that most billionaires ain’t white men, when they are. As are other positions of power: Presidents, politicians, CEOs, etc." How many white men can actually enjoy that power, wealth and influence? How many of them are presidents, politicians and CEOS? Can all of these even be considered "perks'' if only a tiny minority of people actually benef…
/r/AllPillDebate25/06/23 10:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter