TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BestServedCold Archive

View 14 posts and 1,046 comments by BestServedCold on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,046 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's not why she was a liar and I am much more convinced that the young lady in the second incident was telling the truth. Ben's reputation took many hits from many different angles in the last twelve years and I am convinced that he is a selfish, shitty person at minimum. It was harder to root for the Steelers while he was quarterback and I'm glad he's gone. But he was and is innocent of this first accusation, which it is obvious you are utterly ignorant of the details. The first woman, if I …
/r/MensRights30/01/22 01:04 PM
1

I haven't grown a bit but my view on Roethlisberger has certainly evolved. It sure is courageous of you to necro a twelve year old comment with the benefit of a decade's worth of hindsight. Looking at your comment history, specifically the garbage subreddits you infest, makes me think further elaboration would be a waste of both of our time. Have a great day.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 04:49 PM
0

Why hasn't this troll been banned yet?
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:30 PM
-9

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it has completely changed its identity in the year or so since I regularly lurked there... It used to be a hive of shrill, misandrist lesbians. Even worse than /Equality.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:27 PM
0

As a hardcore liberal and hardcore MRA, I wonder how you get past the cognitive dissonance of the shitter that the Chimperor turned this country into and still being a conservative.
/r/MensRights21/03/12 12:24 PM
-1

I know! I'm such a troll. And it would take thirty whole seconds to easily and instantly refute my whole crazy rant. And I'm totally convinced by your excuse for why you wont do it. Regulators..... mount up!
/r/MensRights23/06/10 07:51 AM
-1

No, you're right! I apologize! I was wrong! I forgot all about those bathroom lines....................................... Literally, THE stupidest thing I've ever read on Reddit. Even on YouTube, that would be stupid. So, feel free to point out to me where the ladies have ANYTHING to complain about. OR shut the fuck up. Your call.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 05:23 AM
-1

Nice throwaway, Coward.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 04:44 AM
-1

I've already decimated those who opposed me. That's what I do. You had your chance to help. You failed miserably. Please don't try and lick my asshole now. You've made an enemy here today. And I once had you down as a "friend" on here...
/r/MensRights23/06/10 02:57 AM
-1

Why don't you do me a favor? Why don't you apply that banhammer to me that you've apparently liberally been applying elsewhere. This subreddit has gone to shit and I'd say you're at least partially directly to blame. I'm not advocating for the gutless and I'm not educating the slack-jawed. But maybe long bathroom lines make-up for inequities in circumcision, education, conscription and military discrimination, medical funding and research, divorce and family law, criminal law, dangerous workplac…
/r/MensRights22/06/10 11:08 PM
-2

No. I can't swear it off again because I never stopped. I thought I'd come and recruit some real men to fight the good fight. But I see the real men are all gone, replaced by blogspammers like you and eunuchs like that alpaca cunt.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:33 PM
-5

Bathroom lines...................? Is this a joke? Safety walking at night? WOW! You DO as a moderator of this FINE subreddit know which gender is more often a victim of violent crime, right? What do you propose we as a society do about these Earth-shattering barriers that women face on a daily basis?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:31 PM
-2

It's pretty obvious that you can't answer even the simplest question. So your failure to debate was obvious long before you declared it. You're a sawed-off half man and noone cares if a slithering worm like you is pro-male or not.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:13 PM
0

Hey, Kru5h. How quickly will you be bailing on this subreddit, like the previous one you had?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:08 PM
-4

WOW! I just took a few minutes to look at this sub and it has gone DOWNHILL HARD! Maybe you need a little more hyperbole and a few submitters besides ... you? I guess you're one of those guys who wants to be the captain of the ship, even if he is going to run it into the rocks?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:06 PM
-2

Care to debate my "hyperbole"? Whose side are you on?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:01 PM
-5

And ten people downvoting me. I have a feeling it wouldn't be hyperbole if you were spamming it. I see pn6 made himself a lying hypocrite and added more moderators. And he picked a gem! Edit : I forgot which idiot I was talking about. Pn6 was the coward who cut and ran, leaving this sub in the hands of kanu876. HE was the lying hypocrite and incompetent mod who didn't need any more mods, even when he would disappear from Reddit for weeks on end.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 07:51 PM
1

I'd think about picking up an English text book. Maybe hammer yourself out some coherent literacy.
/r/MensRights11/10/09 11:03 PM
-1

I was being sarcastic. But I can't answer you because I don't post here anymore.....
/r/MensRights09/10/09 08:35 AM
0

You must really hate women to ask questions like this. I hope you're enjoying your patriarchy and male priviledge.
/r/MensRights06/10/09 09:58 PM
0

Exactly. If we're going to give one gender preferential treatment, shouldn't it be men?
/r/MensRights06/10/09 09:57 PM
2

Yeah. It drops all the way down to 10% of men who aren't suspicious are raising children that aren't theirs. A woman who commits paternity fraud should be sent to prison for life.
/r/MensRights05/10/09 10:37 PM
3

http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/04/sorry-ladies-male-birth-control-pill-is.html As an example, according to the 2004 National Scruples and Lies Survey (which polled 5,000 women in the United Kingdom), 42% of women claimed they would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, regardless of the wishes of their partners.
/r/MensRights05/10/09 09:40 AM
1

Dude, should we just exclude all Jewish men from our cause? I've used the word "faggot" a couple of times here, not attacking gay men but attacking the masculinity of people who were disagreeing. I was called out on it and I apologized. I think you should do the same.
/r/MensRights05/10/09 04:16 AM
21

http://www.sentientdevelopments.com/2008/04/sorry-ladies-male-birth-control-pill-is.html As an example, according to the 2004 National Scruples and Lies Survey (which polled 5,000 women in the United Kingdom), 42% of women claimed they would lie about contraception in order to get pregnant, regardless of the wishes of their partners. Yet a woman ALWAYS predictably chimes in on this. http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/9qpsk/the_arrival_of_the_male_pill/c0dzv2s
/r/MensRights04/10/09 05:26 PM
1

Any man who has ANY real money who gets married is nothing but a fool.
/r/MensRights04/10/09 06:43 AM
0

Feminist troll detected! RED ALERT!
/r/MensRights03/10/09 08:13 AM
8

You don't and you can't... unless it's rape. We need to protect women. They are precious flowers and they never EVER lie about rape. At least they don't 58% of the time. And when they do, well, what did HE do to make her? What did he do to drive her to it? We can't exactly punish her for it. And let's definitely keep the names of accusers anonymous. But lets drag the names of the accused through the mud. This is a perfect system. Know how I know? Because noone at /Equality ever complains. And th…
/r/MensRights03/10/09 08:10 AM
8

Despite the increases in men seeking and receiving alimony, advocates warn against linking the trend to equality in the courtroom. Family court judges still tend to favor women, said Ned Holstein, the founder of Fathers & Families, a group advocating family court reform. "Family court still gives custody overwhelmingly to mothers, child support overwhelmingly to mothers, and courts still give almony overwhelmingly to mothers and women," he said. "The family courts came into existence years ago i…
/r/MensRights03/10/09 08:03 AM
8

We can't hold women responsible for their actions. The poor dear. Her husband was cheating on her. If her husband had actually been murdered, she would have immediately made accusations that he was physically abusive. Remember... feminism! All the rights! (.... but no responsibilities...)
/r/MensRights03/10/09 07:59 AM
3

Right. Because this is about the only way a man can win child custody.
/r/MensRights03/10/09 07:58 AM
6

It seems like there are hundreds of tiny regional niche groups. And those groups couldn't possibly have the collective power of one centralized, national group. Why that group doesn't exist, I don't know. I asked this question a few months ago and it was treated like a joke. Someone else asked again about a month ago and he didn't get many responses. Warren Farrell should do it. He could pull it off.
/r/MensRights03/10/09 07:56 AM
1

Celtic, I am sorry for the bullshit you've had to put up with, buddy. You're a much better man than me. There would definitely be someone murdered if I were in your shoes. I admire you for your discipline and your self-control.
/r/MensRights03/10/09 01:02 AM
1

Defining, I'm always a big fan of yours. But this WAS rude and uncalled for. Celtic has a right to vent.
/r/MensRights03/10/09 12:59 AM
-4

I've got news for you. The coozes who come here and download en masse are NOT the MR community. You aren't the MR community. I could not care less what you or any of your other inferior brethren think about anything. I know you're threatened by a man who doesn't silently accept your discrimination. Not all men are total gutless worms, despite what quite a few of the MRAs here might lead you to believe.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 11:52 PM
-3

They do? Gosh! Since when are you part of the MR community? Since when do you presume to speak for the MR community, you fucking cunt?
/r/MensRights02/10/09 11:01 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7z1u1/lawyergirls_hatess_mensrights_so_much_she_visits/
/r/MensRights02/10/09 10:57 AM
7

Wow. And ANOTHER sockpuppet comes out of the woodwork. Who do you dance for, coward? Her point is INVALID for the reason I pointed out. It is something other people could complain about, although they'd be ignorant and wrong. It is something Saydrah has no right to complain about.
/r/MensRights02/10/09 10:35 AM
-4

This one's for all of you who post to /LadyBashing, post to /Equality, post to /Feminisms. This one's for all of you who downvote me or Celticson or Oliveretto or Brunt2 because we make you "look bad". This one's for all of you who never upvote the other MRAs, I guess because you're too lazy and/or stupid. And that includes two of our top ten "contributors". I could name names but I can't prove it. You know who you are. We get downmodded en masse while you stick your thumb up your ass. This one'…
/r/MensRights02/10/09 04:04 AM
6

This from a moderator of a subreddit called "Equality" where she posts vile man-hating propaganda, bans me for being a misogynist troll but allows multiple misandrist trolls free reign, Aerik being chief among them. How ironically delicious that she would have the nerve to come in here and complain about what a subreddit is called. Hey, Saydrah... one more time .... conscription is unfair but applying to women would be MORE unfair, right? These are the cunts that the pussy MRAs want to initiate …
/r/MensRights02/10/09 03:34 AM
1

has to have a career to make a living Wrong bring more life into this world and bear full responsibility for it's well being. Irrelevant. And also indicative of pro-female bias because having a cunt gets you the kid in child custody. ask the Men's Rights movement if the pay gap exists, they will tell you that it does You're wrong. The pay gap does NOT exist. The workforce gaps that DO exist are that 80% of jobs lost in the recession were male and 93% of workplace fatalities are male. These two g…
/r/MensRights01/10/09 04:10 PM
1

When did all women vote you spokesperson?
/r/MensRights01/10/09 05:07 AM
1

If I point a gun at your head and pull the trigger, that doesn't necessarily mean you'll die. If I miss, using your idiotic logic, I should get off scot free, right? If you make a false accusation of rape, you are setting the wheels in motion, using the legal system as your weapon to destroy a life. If you make a false accusation of rape, it is very possible that the person will be sent to prison for decades... because of you... You're a fucking idiot. Get out.
/r/MensRights30/09/09 04:41 PM
16

Since women suffer so badly from losing loved ones, surely they'll demand equal conscription and combat duty next... Just kidding. They'll never demand those. But they WILL demand equal pay and opportunities for advancement in the military.
/r/MensRights30/09/09 08:47 AM
3

The problem with NOT punishing false rape accusers is that we will continue on with the current badly broken model for perpetuity. You have to approach this in a cold, calculating manner. Will increasing punishment for false rape accusers possibly hurt more men in the short term? Yes. For the reasons you have named. You are giving women a reason not to recant. But in the long term, you are making an example that they better not make those false accusations in the first place. And if we can't pro…
/r/MensRights29/09/09 09:15 PM
5

I can rape you in the ass right now for five minutes or I can throw you in a prison cell for the next twenty years where it's possible you'll get raped anyway. Choose one.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 09:08 PM
1

I don't really know how to answer your question, Kuonji. I know it varies widely state-to-state but I know many places, fathers have a very narrow window of time to deny paternity. There are states where the second you sign the birth certificate, you ARE the father and not even DNA can save you from a lifetime of servitude. We could just mandate DNA testing on newborns but that wouldn't serve the female supremacy very well as the 10%+ of them that are despicable whores would be revealed for the …
/r/MensRights29/09/09 09:02 PM
3

She was a shrill, joyless harpy. And once she had her man trapped, she started to treat him with the respect she thought he deserved... none. I've never watched this show but I watched a five minute clip where she interrupted, demeaned, and patronized him with every word she said. And this was when they were still together.
/r/MensRights29/09/09 08:58 PM
0

Well, clearly this was her boyfriend's fault. Anyone want to bet he gets a longer prison sentence? Even though he isn't a parent?
/r/MensRights29/09/09 08:56 PM
4

One look at your username disproves that assertion.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:49 PM
-1

Oh and the leaders of the movement who've done nothing for men or to remedy the inequities they've caused.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:41 PM
-1

So, we've been waiting for forty years for the movement to do even one thing along those lines. So I guess you aren't a feminist then since they've totally failed to live up to your ideals.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:40 PM
0

What was preventing me before from "lobbying" the other mods on your behalf was a desire to avoid grief for me, and your repeated stated desire never to post there again. The cost/benefit ratio made it just not worth it. In other words, as I have repeatedly stated... You are lazy, gutless, incompetent and a spineless coward. You yourself admit this with your craven actions. You can't deny any of these accusations. You are a misandrist hypocrite because everyone realizes Aerik is a troll but you.…
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:36 PM
-1

We sure will miss your misandrist tripe. You and that other cunt Xz can shuffle your asses off to /Equality then. Get the fuck out, stinkvag.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:29 PM
0

You forget, retard. I've seen you try to act like a deep thinker. On that blog of yours.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 08:28 PM
0

Conversations with Aerik aren't totally devoid of a possibility of resolution, or a change of mind. Aerik also makes interesting posts. He's sometimes inflammatory, but generally just a little rough around the edges. Aerik ain't got shit on you, buddy. This is all anybody here needed to see. Thanks. Have a great day. Now, however, in my estimation, letting you back on [equality] would cause nothing but grief for me and others on there. Well, this was always what letting me on there was about. No…
/r/MensRights24/09/09 03:26 PM
-2

Please don't enter conversations that don't concern you or subreddits that are vastly out of your intellectual league.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 03:22 PM
-1

Still waiting here, liar. Waiting for you to explain yourself in public. I know you can't and wont. Just want you to understand I'm not going away.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 03:00 PM
-1

Oopsie. He forgot to tell you what it was about. I explained it at the time. But thanks for taking his word over mine. But that's about what I expect from another misandrist stooge.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 02:58 PM
2

Intercourse. So because the feminist movement freed up women to have more/better sex, we men are supposed to be thrilled with a secondary and completely unintended benefit? Surely you're not suggesting that feminism set out to free women from their confining gender sex roles so men could get more "poon"? This smacks of the misandrist suggestion that women are doing men a favor by "giving" us sex. Money. Your entire argument here consists of no more than your own anecdotal experience. Except here…
/r/MensRights24/09/09 03:21 AM
1

Still waiting.
/r/MensRights24/09/09 12:39 AM
1

Questions you failed to answer... From me What are YOU for? Maybe we should spend the same amount of money on the gender that not only dies more from cancer but also dies from all sources an average of six years earlier? So you for equality actually? Or maintaining female supremacy? From Kanuk876 So the association has an expert on female suicide but none on male suicide, even though suicide is an overwhelmingly male issue well beyond adolescence. Of the 30,622 Americans of all ages who took the…
/r/MensRights24/09/09 12:37 AM
2

I agree with you about Reddit's overall biases. I just don't think MR is inherently pro-life, pro-family, Christian (or relgious or spiritual in general) or Libertarian. I am on the fence about abortion since both sides argue their viewpoint so poorly. I guess I'm pro-family... whatever that means. I'm pro-father. I am so agnostic, I might as well call myself atheist. I didn't vote. I would have voted Obama. But there's only one thing Obama has done that I think pertains to MR and that's the app…
/r/MensRights23/09/09 11:01 PM
3

I don't consider myself a conservative and while I've wondered if this is true in the past... Mens Rights is a traditionally conservative movement I hope for most of us, this movement is so important that it transcends political partisanship or affiliation. I suspect that you weren't being downmodded by your fellow MRAs but perhaps instead by the typical feminist downmod squad. That said, while I don't really want to debate the issue with you because I don't feel passionate enough about it AND b…
/r/MensRights23/09/09 10:06 PM
0

Awesome. So it'll be easy for you to name one thing. Since I'm such a loon. Frankly, I find it a little odd that you didn't already...
/r/MensRights23/09/09 08:50 PM
2

What didn't your female friend not see anything wrong with?
/r/MensRights23/09/09 07:40 PM
3

I'm not sure why you're being downvoted. This IS the movie. I personally would rather people pay to see it but I think that should be left up to the individual. I'm a hypocrite anyway. I steal music but refuse to steal movies. I just love movies too much.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 06:51 PM
3

You're absolutely right. That description is wrong. Good catch, Kuonji. I've never seen Amazon make a mistake that big.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 06:46 PM
-2

You're a liar. You're a hypocrite. You're a lazy and incompetent moderator of a shitty, misandrist subreddit. Perhaps you'd like to explain why I'm banned? Then explain why Aerik isn't? Try to twist your words to avoid looking like the two-faced worm you are. The quote I attributed to you is almost word for word what you said when you tried to deflect criticism that your subreddit is misandrist.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 05:04 PM
0

This is further proof that both subreddits are full of people fighting against each other despite having the same goal (equal rights for genders). That isn't the goal of feminism at all. Feminism is about maintaining female privilege and female supremacy. The feminist movement has done nothing for men ever.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 03:08 PM
4

What if you can't remember if you consented? There is a double standard where a drunken woman isn't responsible for what she does and a drunken man is.
/r/MensRights23/09/09 01:38 PM
1

I find your username disgusting and I don't care what you do.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 03:54 PM
1

Actually, it does. My highlighting to both you and others that your personal experiences don't somehow magically make numerous studies and statistics go away improves the dialogue by forcing you and others to hold yourselves to a higher standard of proof, especially when the had the audacity to answer a question contradictory to the article based on a statistical pool of one.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 03:36 PM
1

Were you ever going to answer the many, MANY questions you dodged in this comment thread?
/r/MensRights22/09/09 02:39 PM
4

You're correct of course. That's why someone downmodded you. Add in getting ready for work and commuting and anyone who says they'd rather go to work than stay home and do housework has never done both. Or they're lying.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 02:12 PM
1

Your anecdotal experience has nothing to do with overall numbers.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 02:10 PM
3

Gosh, there's just one problem. Pollock wasn't misogynistic in the slightest, at least not in the movie. He was an asshole who cheated on his wife and treated pretty much every woman in the movie like shit. There's just one caveat though... he treated all the men like shit too. People don't even know what the word "misandry" means and they casually throw "misogyny" around. There was a controversy about "Knocked Up" being misogynistic because the star (Katherine Heigl) whined about it and a coupl…
/r/MensRights21/09/09 10:31 AM
7

I would hope a thirteen year old would be able to enjoy his teenage years but since he was born with a penis, he has no reproductive rights. And when a woman rapes him, which is exactly what happened here, just like you alluded to in your title, and gets off with the slap on the wrist that she WILL get, there's something wrong.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 09:45 PM
7

Typical moron commenters who don't realize that if she gets pregnant, she can sue him for child support. Imagine being thirteen and your life is over. 13 is not old enough to consent. Period.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 09:35 PM
2

So, do you claim that feminism is standing in the way of equal rights but the men's rights movement is not? It's not that feminism is standing in the way of equality (on THIS issue. On many issues, that's EXACTLY what they're doing). What they're guilty of is standing by and doing nothing for men and claiming they're for equality. Feminism is for female advocacy. Period. They USED to be about equality, by default NOT by virtue of any high-minded generousity, because women had many serious issues…
/r/MensRights20/09/09 09:26 PM
3

This is the /MR subreddit. 95% of feminists are either not educated enough on the issues to come here or are just outright scared that their promotion of female supremacy under the guise of equality will be exposed here. Perhaps instead of focusing on just the underrepresentation of feminists HERE speaking about this issue, perhaps go searching the world over for feminists decrying the misallocation of funds on cancer research. Good luck! Oh and pack a lunch... See, because around here we don't …
/r/MensRights20/09/09 04:08 PM
3

What are YOU for? You answer that question as it pertains to this submission and I'll answer too. You seem to be implying that I am promoting a masculist agenda by DARING to suggest that we should address cancer funding on an equal footing. Maybe we should spend the same amount of money on the gender that not only dies more from cancer but also dies from all sources an average of six years earlier? So you for equality actually? Or maintaining female supremacy?
/r/MensRights20/09/09 03:43 PM
2

But surely since feminists are only after equality, they violently protested this inequity... (crickets) Is this thing on...?
/r/MensRights20/09/09 08:24 AM
1

Monkihed is also very fair-minded, intelligent and eloquent. And we're still forgetting one or two more here at Reddit.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 10:32 PM
4

The disadvantages of being male are what this entire subreddit is built on. If you mean the disadvantages of being a WHITE male, I disagree overall but I think in certain instances, they're right. I am totally opposed to illegal immigration, affirmative action and "hate" crime initiatives. That said, I don't think there's any cause for racism in this fight.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 05:15 PM
3

In fact, I see this entire subreddit as more of a healing and growing place than a podium from which to preach. Once an MRA has matured, and sloughed off their programming, they don't need this subreddit anymore. THAT is excellently put. Derekbo recently accused me, Celticson and Defining_Manhood of being trolls. Leaving me out of it, Celticson and Defining_Manhood are NOT trolls by any stretch. They are angry men who have been marginalized and use this subreddit as a place to vent. They have a …
/r/MensRights19/09/09 04:49 PM
4

There are people on here who feel that being born male should give them certain privilagdes that thier forefathers had. It's a sort of birthright they feel they've been robbed of. That's a pretty outrageous claim and I'd appreciate it if you would either provide some examples or perhaps clarify what you mean. I completely disagree with your overall opinion but I respect how eloquently you stated it. The Israeli/Palestine analogy is apt.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 04:42 PM
1

If you are gay (none of my business), you do have my sincerest apologies and I hope you accept. If not, I apologize anyway for the only thing I regret doing in /MR that I am ashamed of.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 04:29 PM
2

I do act like a troll. Unapologetically. It isn't important to me to dilute my message. I am not here to make friends, compromise, or make conversation with people whose agenda prevents them from caring what I as an MRA have to say. I have used gay slurs in the past. For that, I DO apologize. I have never used gay slurs to insult someone I knew was gay. I have only used them to insult the masculinity of people I was angry at. I wouldn't blame any gay male for castigating me for that. I would hav…
/r/MensRights19/09/09 02:45 PM
1

Yeah, let's rally around Derekbo instead and bask in the glow of the absolutely nothing he's ever done for /MR.
/r/MensRights19/09/09 07:17 AM
2

Thanks... I guess. It's awkward repeatedly saying he/she or putting "he" in quotes. I say Aerik is female and will maintain that opinion until proven wrong.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 10:09 PM
0

Someone's in here, downmodding, 31 minutes after Nitesmoke posted this. Sorry the truth hurts so bad, you gutless, anonymous, jellyfish downmodders
/r/MensRights18/09/09 09:49 PM
5

First of all, prove Aerik is male. Based on what? "His" say so? The he/she known as Aerik was raped once. Raped by a man. How did the supposed rape become a rape in Aerik's twisted worldview? By asking repeatedly. Aerik reluctantly capitulated and decided "he" had been raped. I would say there's at least an 80% chance Aerik is female. But male OR female, Aerik is mentally ill and a troll. And they would ban Aerik in a second from /Equality if Aerik was promoting a masculist agenda. But because A…
/r/MensRights18/09/09 09:32 PM
5

Eartho nailed it. Ann is one of our most respected members. He was trolling you from the getgo.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 06:27 PM
2

Yeah except prenups usually end up being worthless if contested.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 03:27 PM
17

A clear signal WAS sent, Pierce. Just not the one you and I were hoping for.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 03:08 PM
2

Just curious... does the dead man get a chance to defend himself?
/r/MensRights18/09/09 03:01 PM
20

Awesome. So the lesson we've taught her is that this is OK. That's also the lesson we've taught a legion of women familiar with this case. Next time, she'll be smart enough to stick to her story and send the man or men up the river. But don't worry, guys. If she pulls this again, surely the next defense lawyer will be able to bring this up against her. Oh... no... A judge will rule it inadmissible. We can't blame the "victim" after all or assassinate her character. We'll keep her identity secret…
/r/MensRights18/09/09 02:38 PM
0

If 4.5% of prison inmates are sexually assaulted in a year, that would mean that if we send a man to prison for 20 years for a rape he didn't commit, he has roughly a 60.2% (.95520) chance of being raped himself. I love when I encounter the occasional dullard who, when asked which is worse, being raped or being falsely accused of rape, waffles or answers rape. Once you've accepted that a false rape accusation is worse, it is clearly time to dramatically ramp up the prison time for people convict…
/r/MensRights18/09/09 11:56 AM
-2

Your patronizing tone about this whole subreddit. Oh and your answer above. You ARE a misandrist and a disingenuous liar.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 06:41 AM
-2

I AM the one downmodding you. So let's be clear. most of the posts there are just whining posts. Anyway, I tend to disagree with the people claiming victim to sexism against males. Sorry if I'm "whining".
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:44 PM
-3

I think you've misrepresented this entire subreddit in your comments to others and any attempt to lie about it now would just be laughably disingenuous. You are a misandrist and you are a fool. Please don't let the door hit you on the way out.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:38 PM
1

Well, be careful. Wiki says four. Cornell's legal site says ten. Either way, I'm good here in Nevada.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:31 PM
2

If you can believe Wikipedia (and I wouldn't recommend making potentially life-altering decisions based on it) there are only four states that have non-consensual commonlaw marriage, Rhode Island being the worst. Most states have absolutely no commonlaw marriage or the two partners have to sign a paper. Edit - My state, Nevada, apparently has no commonlaw marriage at all.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:16 PM
5

This woman should be facing four 20 year to life sentences. And I want to see her face and name since she's a criminal.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:12 PM
-5

http://www.reddit.com/r/offbeat/comments/9lhkd/man_has_a_40_case_history_of_suing_over_ladies/c0da30q I don't think anyone here cares what you think. The door is that way, you misandrist troll.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:08 PM
-5

So if a man helped himself to what women have been doing for millenia, they WOULD be mercenary pricks while women are simply "accused" of being mercenary? Your misandry is showing. http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/9kk1v/dear_xx_i_am_in_need_of_a_female_perspective/c0d5oj9 Please leave. Never come back.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 10:06 PM
5

Right, but this is for Canadians who have commonlaw marriage everywhere. So while I agree with your advice, I guess if you're Canadian (I'm not), you shouldn't even cohabitate.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 09:54 PM
2

Guys have all the money and power.... hmmm .... which century are you from? But don't let facts or reality get in the way of your misandry.
/r/MensRights17/09/09 01:07 PM
8

Women never lie about rape. You sure must hate women to post this video, Cresur. I bet you falsified this video yourself.
/r/MensRights15/09/09 05:17 PM
2

In a large number of cases, Xs who kill Ys serve no time at all in prison. All this is largely traceable to a very long history of Xs being considered emotionally inferior, less capable, and far less able to make rational decisions for themselves than Ys, a myth that many Xs would love to have dispelled. Right. And of course it will be easy for you to find a citation for me of any prominent feminist leader or feminist organization complaining about the massive sentencing inequities that men expe…
/r/MensRights15/09/09 07:01 AM
7

When women drink and drive, it's the patriarchy that made them do it!
/r/MensRights15/09/09 06:52 AM
4

I'd like to ask the four SCUM who downvoted this - why? I know that asking that question is in vain of course because they lead cowardly lives with no integrity. Maybe this is the organization we should all join.
/r/MensRights15/09/09 06:51 AM
-3

Thanks, Brunt2.
/r/MensRights14/09/09 04:29 PM
4

My personal vendetta? Sweetie, I'm the one who got banned from /Equality BECAUSE of gingerrot's personal vendetta, because of a story about Lorena Bobbitt. How's that reflect on the five or six feminist subreddits? Never mind. I know you can't answer that without sounding like a hypocritical idiot troll. Run along back to ladybashing. Fly, fly!
/r/MensRights14/09/09 04:29 PM
1

Somebody send this to gingerroot so she can have a good laugh.
/r/MensRights14/09/09 05:53 AM
2

I appreciate your kind words but I'd like to point out that I now believe I was wrong and Kanuk876 was right. There are five or fewer feminists who add anything to the dialogue here and Saydrah isn't one of them. I decried the echo chamber then. Now I miss it.
/r/MensRights14/09/09 05:48 AM
2

As a man, I don't know what semen does when it dries in the hair. But I can personally attest that it seems to permanently stain dyed cloth like bleach. I had to throw away a comforter after a marathon session about five years ago.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 11:59 AM
6

this is about men. It's about men gaining fair and equal access to a powerful contraceptive that will finally allow them to have the same control over their reproductive processes as women—an outcome that will greatly benefit male interests. I find that offensive in a few ways. First, it's not just about men, it's not about "male interests," it's about all of us, and the interests of the entire world. The fact that women have a pill and have had it for fifty years and men still don't makes this …
/r/MensRights13/09/09 07:43 AM
16

I worked as a backwaiter (assistant waiter) in a fine dining restaurant. The pay was minimum wage plus the waiters you worked for that night gave you a percentage of their tips. I was making 40$ a night in tips or so. It was a good job for someone my age. You had to work your way up the seniority ladder to go from backwaiter to waiter. This normally took 2-3 years. Every single employee in the restaurant was male EXCEPT the manager and the assistant manager. This was in a major casino corporatio…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 05:15 AM
1

The thing is I totally agree with him there and disagree with him here. He seems incapable of seeing that to hold both of those diametrically opposing viewpoints is nothing short of hypocrisy. Sylvan's solutions for gender issues in sports is do whatever benefits women. The effect on men is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 05:00 AM
2

Change takes time. I expect the only reason the authors don't suggest eliminating the women's leagues right away is to allow for a transition period as they are phased out. From the article Because females have historically faced athletic disadvantages, they should be able to play on all-female teams if they choose. Now who's being disingenuous? They aren't suggesting a phasing out period. They're advocating a permanent double standard, the one you apparently agree with.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:58 AM
7

Because females have historically faced athletic disadvantages, they should be able to play on all-female teams if they choose. But they shouldn't be barred from playing on traditionally male teams. Once you see someone touting "historical disadvantage" as a justification for their misandry and the inherent unfairness of their argument, you can discount pretty much everything they say from then on. Either eliminate ALL gender seperation in sports or NONE. Not just whatever system benefits girls/…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:50 AM
2

OJ would agree with you. He didn't get in REAL trouble by stealing memorabilia. He got in REAL trouble by brandishing a firearm and shouting "Noone's leaving".
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:34 AM
2

I respectfully disagree. I think ANY gender issue at all cannot exist in a vacuum and therefore is relevant here. This could easily effect men who may have to compete not against this athlete but against the next transgender person who comes along.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:29 AM
0

Not optimal, but fair. I totally agree. I don't know what else to do for "her" but she should be allowed to compete somewhere, either against males or against females. I hope she isn't caught in the middle where the women say "he produces testosterone" and the men say "she has breasts and a vagina". That said, if I was a female athlete competing against her, I wouldn't think that was fair. I'm personally satisfied with her disqualification.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:27 AM
6

Perhaps instead of attacking the attitude of the submission, you could refute facts? Or maybe indicate exactly what it is that you dislike so much?
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:22 AM
5

One thing I'm tired of is hearing some women chime in with how this would effect them, specifically that they wouldn't trust men to use it or use it correctly. The implication is that there's no need for a male birth control in their opinion because they don't personally see a need for it. This would be for MEN to take some control and regain some of their reproductive rights. Condoms are a terrible long-term option. I think there are a few women who are threatened by this because they know they…
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:17 AM
2

Letting women into the elite league doesn't mean that the existence of the second-rate one, whether or not men participate in it, has any bearing on what's equal overall. You have just perfectly defined and described INequality and UNfairness.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:05 AM
3

No reason at all, as long as boys can play on girls' teams. Anything else that you propose, based on your own perception of "second-class" leagues, is sexist and misandrist. Boys and men should be given all the opportunities and freedoms girls and women are afforded. Dude, this isn't 1970 anymore. You're not selling us misandry and calling it fairness. Total seperation of the genders in sport. Or none. Anything in between is a hypocritical lie.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 04:04 AM
1

The pain is very secondary, you're right. That wasn't what turned me on anyway. I don't know my terminology.
/r/MensRights13/09/09 03:21 AM
1

Overwhelmingly, the guy got chest-bumping and high fives, while the girl was called a bitch, slut, whore, cunt, etc etc. Which gender was calling her names? I'm a little surprised the guy was getting the high fives too. I slept with a married woman once and my two long time best friends were both lecturing me on multiple occasions and calling me a homewrecker. Interesting. I personally believe in men and womens' rights to promiscuity and even infidelity. I'd prefer people just be honest but that…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 03:43 PM
1

That is bizarre. The S&M scenes, one in particular, in the film "Secretary" is what I'm referring to. I knew what the film was about in advance and couldn't believe how arousing I found it. Where's your friend live? You should hook us up. Sell me to her as "Reddit's #1 Misogynist!". She'll love that!
/r/MensRights12/09/09 03:24 PM
7

I don't think that's a bad idea. But either I can make fun of everyone else as a white male or they can't make fun of me. I wont settle for the current double standard. So even though I like your idea, unless you can figure out how to get everyone else to hand in their victim card, I want mine.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 10:27 AM
0

or in /equality/ where there is at least an attempt to find common ground? I've been banned from /Equality, ostensibly for trolling. Aerik has not. Saydrah wouldn't allow WBB posts and then posted MBB posts HERSELF. I respect your right to your opinion but you will NEVER convince me this isn't laughably false. Is maturity and civility such an onerous request? It shouldn't be. But it has been from my opponents. I believe in fighting fire with fire. And besides Sylvan, I do you a favor by looking …
/r/MensRights12/09/09 10:18 AM
2

I perceive both jokes at womens' expense, and the horrifying cultural development of treating men like they are too stupid to do anything and thus women as having the responsibility to clean up after or compensate. It's a horrible thing to do to both genders. Good point. On reddit, men are constantly praised, reminded of how women have done them wrong, republicans are evil, and Christianity is the bane of existence. I can't believe how much I agree... and disagree with this sentence. Don't forge…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 09:54 AM
1

I'm 35 years old, have always been quite sexual and physical and just this week discovered something new about my sexuality, something that absolutely shocked me. So when someone says there's actually six billion sexualities, I agree.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 09:41 AM
0

There are a lot of assholes out there (and from some of the anger I've seen here, I guess there are a lot of bitches out there too). I'm extremely lucky, I think, to have had some of the men in my life that are/were awesome and amazing fellas. Most people, men AND women, are inherently good and given the right environment, will do good deeds. When someone beats a little old lady to snatch her purse, that makes the news. When someone donates their time to an animal shelter or a soup kitchen, noon…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 09:39 AM
1

How is this all that different than the fellow with the gun? Unless you've left out some context, there's all the difference in the world. If I ask you pleasantly and kindly for sex with a gun in my hand, I am implying violence, especially when I am in your house at 7AM by breaking in. If I ask you for sex and I have a funny look on my face, but haven't threatened you, I'm not saying you're wrong to feel threatened anyway. But I think you ARE wrong to consent and then call it rape. I think there…
/r/MensRights12/09/09 09:36 AM
3

I owe you an apology. I named three names the other day as the only women who I felt added anything to the discussion around here. Ladyskins, Cassio and monkihed. I forgot you and if you saw that comment, I'd like to admit your exclusion was a forgetful error on my part. I think you add a lot to this subreddit and I hope you continue to come here. PS - I forgot wanna_dance and anticaptcha too...
/r/MensRights12/09/09 06:37 AM
2

Women are generally not funny. But Sarah Silverman is BRILLIANT, and her humor is both very low-brow and self-deprecating. She is clearly very smart and portrays herself as an oblivious ditz.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 06:33 AM
2

I agree. I'll admit I'm always secretly happy that women have to pay, good for the goose, good for the gander, etc, etc. But it is an outdated concept whose time has come and gone. It should be totally abolished.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 06:29 AM
2

Saydrah IS like that. I know you and her are real tight buddies, Gareth. I once thought I was her buddy too.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 06:13 AM
3

Any woman who thinks it's impossible to get an erection in your sleep... Ask ANY man who's ever lived. Or even a woman who's ever lived with a man.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 06:11 AM
-2

I'm not trying to be a jerk and I sympathize for your 7AM rape. But a guy wanted sex and you consented because of what you thought he MIGHT do... (the date "rape") ... I have to strongly disagree with that being called a rape.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 06:06 AM
3

Enough lesbians have anger issues with men that I think it is a justly deserved prejudice. However, there are also enough heterosexual women who despise men, that your point is valid anyway. If you see a woman hating on men, odds are overwhelming that she isn't a lesbian.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 05:57 AM
15

Women just want peace!
/r/MensRights11/09/09 05:53 AM
1

you tend to threaten sexual harm to people in conversation I don't like your usage of that loaded word. You're implying that something I have done two or three times is something I've done repeatedly. I assure you, everytime I have done something like this, it was to troll someone so hard that they ignored me and stopped replying to me. I am not diluting my message for anyone else's sake or to appear less "creepy". Whether or not you get laid is hardly a judge of how nice you are. I never implie…
/r/MensRights11/09/09 05:22 AM
1

It makes me wonder if that extremist feminist thought as perpetutated by Andrea Dworkin has filtered into more moderate feminist thought, i.e all heterosexual sex is rape. If I was talking to a woman I respected, I wouldn't use the word "cunt". I do it to be a jackass. As for your horse/cart analogy, that's a good point and I don't know how you'd ever answer that question.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 05:10 AM
-1

Hey, Sylvan... I have a degree of respect for you, based on what you post. But as long as you do more posting in /Equality than you do in /MR, I really don't give a shit what you think about my attitude. I don't owe you a thing. I don't owe the MR movement a thing. I'm not going to pretend to be someone I'm not in the interests of kneeling before the feminists here. You know who makes us look bad in my opinion? People who tolerate the misandry of /Equality and continue to post there. I'd say tha…
/r/MensRights11/09/09 05:07 AM
1

Since I have self-identified in the past as a misogynist, it's tough for me to get too upset with your using the term. But let me clarify two points in my defense a little. I don't hate baby girls, little girls, teen girls. I hate MOST (not all) women. I don't expect you to believe me but I am a very smart and very nice guy in real life. I don't have any problem getting laid, and I don't have a George Sodini-eqsque cache of firearms. Reddit allows me to express myself anonymously about issues th…
/r/MensRights11/09/09 01:07 AM
0

Pretty sad that I've asked this question at least a dozen times, including multiple times here at Reddit and you're the first person who's ever been smart enough to answer it. I'm still going to use the word. But next time someone complains, maybe I'll quit... depending on the person of course...
/r/MensRights10/09/09 03:33 PM
2

That's actually a good theory ... but then it should be OK for men to call each other cunts ... and it isn't.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 03:25 PM
7

Who exactly is going to castrate us? Them? How many femidykes does it take to castrate a man? Or maybe they expect the gimped out, gelded, eunuch pseudomales like Aerik and Xzxzzx to do it. Can you imagine Aerik forced into a situation where he had to get tough with another, real, man? Wow, full disclosure time. On a spectrum of homosexuality, I am 100% straight... but maybe I am a little homo because the thought of smashing Aerik's skull in suddenly gave me a raging clue!
/r/MensRights10/09/09 03:12 PM
1

I know the Pitino accusation but I didn't see his response. Good enough to seek out?
/r/MensRights10/09/09 01:46 PM
2

Meh. No problem. And obviously I agree with your assessment of the cu*t double standard.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 01:37 PM
4

Not only can I NOT see the comment you're referring to, I can't even see the comment where you replied to me here. I CAN see it under my red envelope. Weird. Log out and log back in maybe? Reddit can still be wonky from time to time.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:52 PM
5

The PGA is the men's golf league. There is also an LPGA for women. Men are not allowed to compete in it for obvious reasons but there was an excellent female golfer who WAS allowed to tryout for the PGA.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:47 PM
2

Good catch with the double negative. I wont edit it so people will see that you caught me fair and square.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 12:46 PM
0

Having never met you or Gareth and knowing nothing about each of you physically, my money is on Gareth to kick the dogfuck out of you. Now STFU and GTFO, troll.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:18 AM
1

Gutless sockpuppet troll, too afraid to submit under real account.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:17 AM
1

I don't mean to be rude at all. But I'm going to need TWO citations. one in twenty men is over six feet tall. one in a thousand women is. The average male height is I believe 5'9" and the female is 5'6", Knowing nothing about this subject or statistics or probability, I would guess that those stats are both WAY off based on nothing but intuition. This is based on a US population. Maybe if you threw the world in...
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:15 AM
5

Women should NEVER be allowed to compete against men in athletic competition unless men in that same sport can compete in theirs. The woman who competed on the PGA... disgusting.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:09 AM
1

Ann, he made his statement. He is preparing for a defense of a Super Bowl title. The timing was terrible because when this woman came forward, the Steelers were already in training camp. I say let him focus as much on football as possible for now. Let's see if he does anything differently in the offseason. I guarantee you his every move is being dictated by his legal counsel. I was proud of Ben for clearly being angry during his brief press conference.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:08 AM
11

I don't watch that show. My roommate does. My roomie says that she treated him horribly like a nagging shrewish cunt from day one. That he NEVER looked happy.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:05 AM
2

The problem that I see with the objections you guys are raising is that they are arbitrary and probably almost always irrelevant in today's modern, mechanized military. Men can carry more? So what? Noone's marching infantry anymore. As for test standards for fitness being equal, what is your alternative? NOT drafting women if needed? NOT signing them up for conscription as a prerequisite for all the benefits of citizenship that they currently enjoy? Letting them join a volunteer military and shi…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 11:04 AM
17

I've ranted about this before. And I've been told MANY times that I was offending someone by using the word. I have asked those same people each and every time why they feel offended by that word and why they feel SO offended. They have never failed to adequately answer that question to anything close to my satisfaction. So, I'm going to tell you my theory. When you refer to the female genitals in a derogatory fashion, you devalue the currency of the matriarchy. The lifestyle that many modern wo…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:34 AM
6

For those who don't already know the tawdry tale, this is the CUNT who got me banned from /Equality. There was a video where Oprah's audience laughed when Lorena Bobbitt described having difficulty driving with her husband's severed penis in her hand. In a thread that was NOT in /Equality, I mentioned that if a woman ever did that to me, I would take a rusty grapefruit spoon and carve out her genitals. Gingerroot, being the utter and total misandrist cowardly piece of filth she is told Saydrah t…
/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:14 AM
5

She wanted to be a cunt in two places at once.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:03 AM
4

I can see THIS comment. Is this the one you mean?
/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:01 AM
1

Who the fuck are you to talk to Tomek that way? Where do you FUCKING guys come from? New guys who have never posted a fucking thing, never contributed a thing, telling other users who is hurting "their" cause. Hey, cunt... I'm on Tomek's side. So you're hurting OUR cause. Now get the fuck out!
/r/MensRights10/09/09 10:00 AM
3

Ann, you got WorstOfed. As is typical for the gutless losers who use /WorstOf, this coward is a sockpuppet. http://www.reddit.com/r/worstof/comments/9iqi0/stay_classy_rmensrights/
/r/MensRights09/09/09 12:11 PM
-1

Let me explain something to you. I used to try to explain things and have nice calm, rational debates. But the feminists downmodded me and accused me of being a troll. If I'm going to get called a troll, I'm going to have some fun. I don't speak for the MR movement and don't really care what you or any other pseudodyke thinks one way or the other. By the way, sorry if I struck a nerve with the fat, ugly cat lady comment. Another thirty years or so and it will all be over. Your kitties will thank…
/r/MensRights09/09/09 10:34 AM
-6

It must suck to have people talking about sex when you're a fat, ugly, cat lady that noone wants to fuck and I don't want to rape. Do you have any granddaughters though?
/r/MensRights09/09/09 09:59 AM
-1

I'll tell you what I did. I upvoted every submission and upvoted every comment made by the ten or so guys on my friend's list. I continued to note the lack of reciprocation by almost all of them including one of our top ten guys who never upvotes anything. The lack of cohesion and unity in this subreddit is disillusioning and disgusting. I don't think I'm long for this place. Brunt2, thank you for defending me in another thread. Kanuk876, my apologies to you. You were right and I was wrong about…
/r/MensRights09/09/09 07:02 AM
-4

Hey, am I still banned in /Equality? By you? Yet you come over here and troll in this subreddit? Why don't you tell me your home address so I can come anally rape you and cut your throat, you hypocritical cunt?
/r/MensRights09/09/09 06:45 AM
-2

Buddy, I've already looked over your banal, inane, one sentence comment history. It's pretty clear that there isn't a single subject you know enough about to discuss with anyone except maybe pets and small children. I'm sure the losers who use Reddit for shitty pornography appreciate your efforts though.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 03:19 PM
-8

Is that your methodology for refutation or intelligent debate, troll? Don't you have some tit pictures to post, dullard?
/r/MensRights08/09/09 03:02 PM
-11

Hey, were you going to let everyone know you WorstOfed AND LadyBashed this submission? http://www.reddit.com/r/worstof/comments/9iff8/only_on_mensrights_is_lending_money_to_the/ http://www.reddit.com/r/LadyBashing/comments/9ifaq/only_on_mensrights_is_lending_money_to_the/ Anyone who submits anything to /WorstOf is the worst kind of coward. That subreddit exists solely so gutless worms can go get other people to downmod unpopular opinions they themselves are too stupid to refute or debate. Agree?…
/r/MensRights08/09/09 02:42 PM
1

So when they find the prostitute, she'll do twenty years right? Because if I hire a hitman to kill someone and he does and we both get caught, the guy who actually pulled the trigger is going to get the more severe prison sentence. Oh, never mind. I forgot. The prostitute has a vagina. 10 days suspended sentence.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 12:29 PM
3

I totally agree. Let me choose between being raped and being falsely accused of rape. I'll take the false accusation. Now fast forward and I've just been convicted and sentenced? Let me go back in time and choose the rape. Anyone who says they'd rather do 20 years in prison, where they might get raped ANYWAY, than get raped is a liar or a moron. Or both.
/r/MensRights08/09/09 12:27 PM
2

You probably could find two of my comments that contradict one another. I just don't know that you'd find them so diametrically opposed and posted one right after another in chronological order. I just love the hypocrisy where you get to tell everyone else how to Reddit but noone else better do that!
/r/MensRights07/09/09 10:10 PM
2

http://www.reddit.com/user/Derekbo Here you go. Read a little of this. You'll quickly find A. Yourself rarely commenting here. B. Yourself making an inanely stupid comment to me. Now read this... http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9hyla/right_theres_no_misogyny_on_mensrights/ C. Celticson quoting you that Bible passage you were looking for. Welcome to Reddit! I'll worry about your methodology for getting things done when you post here more than twice a year and when you actually get som…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 10:09 PM
-3

I knew I recognized this idiot from somewhere. Read these two comments that he made back to back. http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/8pcf8/okay_reddit_im_getting_tired_of_this_you_downvote/c0a0hxu http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8pcp3/from_the_female_genital_cutting_education_and/c0a0iui Misandry and hypocrisy in one neat package!
/r/MensRights07/09/09 10:58 AM
-3

Well, we agree on one thing... you were trolling.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 09:19 AM
2

Saying that you'll upvote no matter -what- people say implies that you'd support them even if you found their ideas without merit. Let's clear up the implication and replace it with an ironclad declaration. If Celticson posted a video of himself clubbing baby seals while anally raping my grandma, I'd upvote him for his sheer audacity. There is a guy on here named ocononosta. Something like that. He made what I perceived as a racist comment and I downvoted him for that. But I've upvoted everythin…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 07:54 AM
-2

You're either a female or a eunuch. I don't really care which.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 07:46 AM
-3

You're a fucking retard on top of being an actual troll. Thanks for stopping by /MensRights. Judging by your comment history, we'll see you in another year or so.
/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:41 AM
1

You didn't even have to link to one. DOGA just showed up on her own!
/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:34 AM
-1

Celticson isn't a troll. If you read one out of a hundred comments here, you'd know that. And you are...?
/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:33 AM
0

Yep. Because you haven't been paying attention. We get downvotes here en masse, no matter what's said. We have at least one, maybe two regular users here, MRAs, who never upvote anyone else. So if there are people downvoting despite what's said, there need to be upvotes to counteract them. You're an idealist who hasn't been around long enough to realize... noone is looking for calm, rational debate with us. We're wrong the second we open our mouths and dispute the feminist manifesto. Don't feel …
/r/MensRights07/09/09 06:32 AM
0

When are you going to admit you were wrong about the bible comment? I don't think you post here often enough to tell anyone else here what to do. I see you make a lot of comments everywhere on Reddit BUT here. When you do make a comment, it's a dumbass comment addressed to me. Celticson is on my friend's list and I don't care what he says, he's getting upvoted. That's called loyalty. Unlike you, he contributes here. Perhaps you should spend a little more time in /Equality, /Feminisms, /LadyBashi…
/r/MensRights07/09/09 04:19 AM
2

Yeah. All she did was bounce a glass bottle off of someone's head. Oh wait... she IS a bitch AND a cunt. I would have called her a cunt if I had submitted the video.
/r/MensRights06/09/09 06:05 AM
4

She banned me from /Equality ostensibly because I am a troll. Meanwhile, the biggest troll on Reddit, Aerik, posts there daily. I wonder if the fact that I am a MRA and Aerik is a man-hating misandrist piece of trash has anything to do with Saydrah's hypocritical double standard. Saydrah also feels that conscription of men is unjust and that consequently conscripting women would be MORE unjust. I would say that anyone who feels that way is so ideologically opposed to me that I'm not interested i…
/r/MensRights06/09/09 06:04 AM
1

I'm assuming this whole article is some sort of joke? That's the first sentence. with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional or disciplinary response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. YOUR definition of a troll from Wikipedia. Troll. Case closed.
/r/MensRights06/09/09 05:50 AM
0

Good job! Unfortunately, one down, a million more to go.
/r/MensRights05/09/09 11:03 AM
-1

I don't know where you've been but welcome. Friended. I will always upvote everything you say and every submission.
/r/MensRights05/09/09 07:54 AM
1

1."Feminism" has infinite definitions. It's hard to find commonality from one feminist to another about what it means. The best I have found is that, at the core, feminism is the belief that women are just as valuable as men. Every group of people believes they are just as valuable as the next group of people, so I think that giving it a title is redundant. Here's where this gets tricky. You say these are your beliefs and what defines you. OK, I believe you. You then say you self-identify as a "…
/r/MensRights05/09/09 07:53 AM
-1

Only a woman-hating misogynist would ever ask that question!
/r/MensRights05/09/09 05:08 AM
-2

You stupid fucking cunt. There ARE people who believe EXACTLY that. Drop in on /feminisms or /equality sometime. Don't fucking tell me what the misandrist femidykes around here believe. I'm in the trenches with them every day, you vapid illiterate banal piece of trash. What's it like to be utterly inferior? I can't wait until you get old enough that noone wants that stinkhole of yours. Then you'll finally figure out how relevant anyone thinks your opinion is.
/r/MensRights05/09/09 04:22 AM
-4

Actually, as much as I HATE 99% of women, and would be considered a radical MRA by nearly ANY standard, even I don't advocate for letting real sexual criminals off or excusing their behavior. That's how ridiculous this comic is. NOONE in the MR movement believes what this buffoon of a "comic" is ascribing to them. I find it's easier to ridicule what we don't understand. In this guy's case, what he's too intellectually lazy to even make a half-hearted attempt to understand. You don't know me. You…
/r/MensRights05/09/09 02:53 AM
2

Oh and by the way, who are you a sockpuppet for, you craven cunt?
/r/MensRights05/09/09 01:24 AM
1

First of all, because you are clearly VERY slow on the reading comprehension, this is TWO people's word against one. So from the getgo, you have exposed yourself as a slow-witted mongoloid. Then you agree that it is hypocrisy to convict someone of a false rape accusation based on he said / she said hearsay? Again, that isn't even what we're talking about here. But for the sake of argument, you're wrong anyway because that's what men are convicted based on. Therefore it is NOT hypocritical to req…
/r/MensRights05/09/09 01:10 AM
-2

Right. Let me explain the caption to you too. This woman finds the honesty of masculists refreshing compared to the false chivalry of white knight sunshine feminists, the types of limpwrist pseudomales that are upvoting you. Even when she finds the (misrepresented) viewpoints of MRAs offensive. But I'm the retard... I sure would love to bash your fucking face in. I guess I'll have to settle for exposing you for the slack-jawed imbecile you are.
/r/MensRights05/09/09 01:03 AM
-2

+75 now. You're right. What is this submission doing here? Hurrrr Duuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
/r/MensRights04/09/09 10:07 PM
6

Let me get you up to speed, despite the fact that you're a misandrist tool who badmouths this subreddit. We (many of us, not all) DO want false rape accusers to do the same sentence a rapist would do. But they don't. We do want those accused of rape to require more than he said/she said hearsay to be convicted of rape. But they don't. Two people are saying this wasn't a rape, one is saying it is. That would be WAY more than we would need to convict a rapist. It should be way more than we need to…
/r/MensRights04/09/09 09:52 PM
-1

What ongoing gender wars? This is all you had to type. Go back to sleep, dullard. We'll take care of everything for your sons and grandsons.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 09:37 PM
-2

You're a moron. I read the comic several times to make sure what I was reading was real. Reread what the guy says to his date. Let me know if you need me to draw you a picture. And by the way, this guy is never funny.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 09:36 PM
-4

You're a misandrist troll and anything you submitted would be irrelevant.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 09:35 PM
-7

/MR is here to cover a gamut of men's issues. So this could be about almost anything and it would be relevant here. If one person thinks it belongs and a thousand don't, it belongs here. ANY submission that could be used as ammo in the ongoing gender wars is relevant here. This is obviously a perfect example of that. I'd like you to examine why you think you have the right to say that this doesn't belong here when it's sitting at +43 as I type this. Clearly, the majority that you seem to think i…
/r/MensRights04/09/09 09:29 AM
-8

If you had visited this subreddit more than once or twice you'd know that the standard default argument for why something is applicable here applies to this submission as well. I've typed it out ten times at least. I don't have the patience to explain it over and over to guys like you who are too lazy and too disinterested to take an interest here and are still hypocritical and self-absorbed enough to think anyone gives a fuck about your opinion.
/r/MensRights04/09/09 07:08 AM
1

Defeating a person and raping them aren't the same thing, they aren't in the same neighborhood and they aren't in the same universe. The only other peron I've ever seen subscribe to the belief you just attested to is Aerik, Reddit's biggest misandrist troll. I have nothing more to say to you. Your life philosophy sickens me. I hope for your sake we revoke all of women's rights immediately since women can't be trusted to even know what they want. You are the ultimate proponent of what is wrong wi…
/r/MensRights03/09/09 10:45 PM
3

I am fairly sure that I am about to ignore you forever... Is asking, "force"? If asking over and over again with an agenda and undue pressure yes. Especially after a person has already said no. So, if I ask a woman for sex repeatedly and she says no twenty times and then eventually gives in, have I raped her?
/r/MensRights03/09/09 09:59 PM
2

The article is excellent. The comments are just as good.
/r/MensRights03/09/09 08:10 AM
1

Noone cares about Muslim women in some dusty shithole. Noone cares about women at the turn of the last century. Let's address gender issues here at home before we worry about what other countries are doing or what historical injustices women had to face. Men face injustice, discrimination and prejudice. HERE. TODAY. Women are engineered through the media to excessively cover up their natural self That isn't discrimination or inequality. That's a pressure WOMEN put on other women. That isn't quan…
/r/MensRights03/09/09 01:54 AM
-12

This is a hostile, vile, disgusting comic. It is anti-funny. The implication is that we only care about discrediting actual sexual assault victims. This is the actual mindset of many of the misandrist slugs here at Reddit. This is how we're perceived. By the way, I've never seen ONE of this guy's shitty comics that WAS funny. At all. Now that I know I would break every bone in his hands if I ever met him in real life, I doubt I'll change my mind anytime soon.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:40 PM
-2

How can you not see he's ridiculing, minimizing, and disparaging the cause of men's rights?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:37 PM
2

Though mothers are still the ones expected to stay home with the kids, they are not entirely alone. U.S. Census figures from 2006 showed that 159,000 men were staying home with their children while their wives worked. This is a fucking lie. Expected by WHO!? Who expects to just say bullshit like this and have undiscerning fucking morons believe it? If women want to stay at home and raise children, cool. If women want to pursue a career, cool. If men want to pursue a career, well ... that's what …
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:32 PM
0

How didn't they achieve equality? When you're done NOT answering that, feel free to also NOT answer my request for showing where you have contributed ANYTHING to this subreddit. Until you do so, noone cares about your opinion.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:26 PM
-5

You are a misandrist troll. Noone wants you here. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:24 PM
-1

You're right of course. I'm biased. You're not. You didn't use a loaded word to disparage the posters here. It was my imagination. Oops. You totally failed to address that. AFTER utterly failing to address the fairness of a system where a cunt is handed kids for having a cunt. I see you're like every other misandrist who comes in here. You only address the parts of comments you can get your panties bunched up about. Feel free to fuck off back to /Equality and /Feminisms and /Ladybashing and all …
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:22 PM
0

By the way, that book is brilliant and should be required reading for all prospective marrieds.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:17 PM
0

Perhaps instead of whining about the submission or comment content here, you could actually contribute to it. Maybe cite where you have done so. The point for men's rights is equality, which we do not have. The point for feminism WAS equality, until they achieved victory decades ago. That is not their goal anymore. They want more and more and more.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:16 PM
2

Care to actually refute with anything meaningful?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 11:10 PM
1

God DAMN, another cowardly sockpuppet!? It's none of your business how it relates to /MR. Post under your real account or STFU.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 10:09 PM
-1

Spare me your transparent disingenuousness. When you use a loaded word like "lamenting", you imply that those who would complain about the system are doing so unneccessarily. That is your implicit approval of the system. I don't think it's much of a stretch to also attribute to you the prejudicial and biased line of thinking that as men, we aren't allowed to complain about anything. Isn't feminism about freeing ourselves of the yoke of external gender roles? Or is that just one more hypocrisy of…
/r/MensRights02/09/09 10:07 PM
0

The irony of course is that in attempting to expose a group's prejudices, you've exposed your own. Perhaps in contrast to this subreddit's "lamenting the unfairness of the system", you think the system is fair? Can you explain to me which part of a vagina or a uterus contains the superior parenting skills? a generalized wag of the finger Yeah, we'd hate to have that. Sorry we subscribe to our own set of prejudices and not yours. Then again, I don't stop by here very often so I may be completely …
/r/MensRights02/09/09 08:07 PM
0

Care to elaborate on your snide remark? Perhaps, there are questions YOU'D like to ask monkihed? If so, maybe YOU should ask them. It seems to me that Ann asked questions and monki answered them to his satisfaction. Or perhaps you think a system that fucks men 99% of the time is fair because occasionally the system grabs a woman by pure random accident?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 07:49 AM
-1

Yes, Reddit is quite misandrist. Oh, but that's not quite what you meant, is it? Perhaps you could drop in more than once a month and when you do, maybe contribute something other than your judgmental holier-than-thou bullshit about resisting bitterness when the system rapes you in the ass. The irony is that that bitterness is based on anger at the injustice of the system that you seem to embrace. Not everyone grabs their ankles and takes it.
/r/MensRights02/09/09 07:47 AM
-2

What do YOU think, sockpuppet?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 07:36 AM
2

So men are "fucked in the head" because they don't accept a power paradigm where we're discriminated against on a daily basis?
/r/MensRights02/09/09 07:33 AM
2

That's a terrible analogy. I have no problem with legitimate child support debts being pursued. But let me remind you that there's only two kinds of debtor's prison in this country. IRS debt and child support debt.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 04:32 PM
8

You don't owe me anything. I don't owe you anything. When that other man is fucking, so is the wife. Please don't blame cheating women on other men. Let there be ONE thing they take responsibility for.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:38 AM
0

Women cheat almost as much as men in marriage. I believe the percentages were 65% vs. 60%. And when women cheat, the consequences are possibly much more severe. I think, like almost everyone else, that automatic DNA tests solve a whole lot of these problems. Make them automatic and women don't have to whine about not being trusted. However, until we get those tests, I agree with the OP. Hiding paternity problems from a prospective father should be criminal. The problem would be the logistics of …
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:37 AM
6

The tycoon, not society and NOT YOU, should get to define what fatherhood means to him.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:33 AM
2

Probably 7. Maybe 6. The child is about to turn 12 in October. Add in gestation.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:31 AM
2

You signed up for a credit card. He didn't sign up for children. If we mandated DNA paternity tests for all newborns and required that data before we allowed child support to begin, this would never happen.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 10:30 AM
4

At the core, the fundamental problem I think is with how education treats boys. Boys are expected to behave like girls; to sit still, pay attention, and do the things that I never could do as a boy. I argue that this leads to the observed polarizing phenomenon: the boys who find it very difficult to suppress boyish/male behavior act up, rebel, goof off, or otherwise do poorly in class. Those boys who do enjoy class material, because they are forced to act in a certain way, learn to suppress such…
/r/MensRights01/09/09 04:45 AM
10

I totally agree. But this would ALL be moot if mandatory paternity testing were done on all newborn infants, at least the ones where a prospective father is present or is indicated in documents. You shouldn't be able to put a man on the birth certificate until this testing has been done. Obviously, child support shouldn't be given until a match has been made. This whole argument where the rights of a child should outrank the rights of a father are patently ridiculous. As usual, we're REALLY prot…
/r/MensRights01/09/09 04:36 AM
12

Right. And yet someone is STILL garnishing his wages. Doesn't it frighten you that all these entities lording over the "child" support system all point fingers at each other while his cash disappears? I'd say it IS a /MR issue.
/r/MensRights01/09/09 02:42 AM
24

Hospital staff have felt bound to keep the secret from him. But when they told the mom, it came as no surprise; it rarely does. This isn't their right. And if it came out later, he should be able to sue them into oblivion. Several U.S. states are considering legislation that could exempt non-biological fathers from having to pay child support. Wow! How progressive! You shouldn't have to pay for someone else's kid!? Who's the genius who came up with this!? If the case involves an expectant mother…
/r/MensRights01/09/09 02:35 AM
1

I don't remember it either and I also have no problems with things the way they are. But according to my dad, he doesn't remember filling out a form or being asked for permission. He thinks they just automatically did it as a SOP. That kind of pisses me off more than anything.
/r/MensRights31/08/09 06:42 PM
11

I'm not as anti-circumcision as many of my fellow MRAs although this is a compelling submission, Brent. I know it's an important issue to a lot of people here and therefore it's important to me. That said, why NOT just let little boys alone and let them decide for themselves when they reach 18? Is there a major difference between performing the operation on an infant and on an adult male?
/r/MensRights31/08/09 08:35 AM
1

I didn't think you had the intellect or the balls to refute anything I said. Please post pics of your girlfriend. Does she live in the Niagara Falls area by any chance?
/r/MensRights31/08/09 01:05 AM
2

So it's your opinion that only women should be allowed to complain about inequities and unfairness? Let's face facts. You have no idea what we talk about here and you aren't entitled to an opinion because you don't have any education or research on these topics. Don't worry though, you chickenshit gimp. The REAL men here at /MR are battling everyday to make sure you get treated fairly, even if you're too stupid to realize how badly the deck is stacked against you.
/r/MensRights31/08/09 12:16 AM
2

Let's play spot the troll... here's one!
/r/MensRights30/08/09 09:02 PM
1

Well, one thing's for sure. I've never seen a male accused of this kind of crime whose identity was protected.
/r/MensRights30/08/09 08:58 PM
0

This isn't even an argument. Why not the biological father? Why the biological father?
/r/MensRights30/08/09 08:35 PM
4

I think it's possible parmesanHack is a troll. User for eight days. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt since her comments are fairly eloquent, if not completely indefensible.
/r/MensRights30/08/09 08:34 PM
8

Fantastic submission. And if anyone whines how old it is, please also include your explanation for why that makes it less relevant today.
/r/MensRights29/08/09 10:57 PM
1

You think they're here because of my asking questions? You think they'd go away if I stopped? I assure you, my masculine "affirmations" are superfluous and I don't need an audience to preach to. I preach either way.
/r/MensRights29/08/09 02:47 PM
2

Knew WHAT history? You forgot to answer two questions. Shouldn't I have been able to force her into an abortion? After all, I was raped.
/r/MensRights29/08/09 02:41 PM
1

Why would you feed the infestation? Unless your masculine affirmations need something to bounce off of.... I'm gonna need a little clarification on what you mean by this? What infestation?
/r/MensRights29/08/09 09:24 AM
8

You really destroyed her but you let her diffuse the argument by getting WAY off point. I give you an A-.
/r/MensRights29/08/09 09:00 AM
2

Cowards downmod but they don't refute.
/r/MensRights29/08/09 04:24 AM
24

You know, I had an on-again, off-again ex-girlfriend who had become a friend with benefits. We were in this state for years. She had four kids by three different fathers. She had been molested as a girl by her own father, yet allowed the father to babysit her kids. Well, I hate condoms. And we had always used the rythym method and so far, it's never let me down. She was also enthusiastic about (although not necessarily proficient at) oral sex and enjoyed anal sex so it was rarely an issue. One n…
/r/MensRights29/08/09 04:21 AM
10

The John Moores team, headed by Professor Mark Bellis, raised the issue in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. "For any father, identifying that the child they are raising is actually sired by another man can have substantial health consequences. "Such knowledge can also destroy families , affecting the health of the child and mother as well as that of any man who is subsequently identified as the biological parent." I would tell my fellow MRAs to be ever vigilant for people who wo…
/r/MensRights29/08/09 04:12 AM
4

You really seem to want this guy to put up the white flag. I admit it looks bad for him, as it looks bad for ANY man in this situation but how about we get to the battlefield before we surrender.
/r/MensRights28/08/09 10:01 PM
3

You need to give us a LOT more details. Why are you interested in a divorce? Who's initiating this? If it's you, does she know you feel this way? If it's you, why? Are you now or have you ever had an affair? If so, did or does your wife possibly know? What's your wife's educational level and work history? If divorced would either of you be inclined to relocate? Do one or both of you use narcotics, drink, or smoke? Are you interested in custody of your daughters?
/r/MensRights28/08/09 09:04 PM
-2

Can you prove it wasn't?
/r/MensRights28/08/09 08:56 PM
4

Dworkin was the worst kind of vile misandrist pig. Anyone who would cite her in an attempt to converse with a MRA is being willfully ignorant of the negative reaction even mentioning her name should and does conjure up.
/r/MensRights28/08/09 07:31 AM
10

Alimony is an outdated concept. Get a fucking job, you lazy, golddigging whore. You're liberated now.
/r/MensRights28/08/09 07:21 AM
1

I wouldn't fire warning shots. But I have never fired at a human being and pumped with adrenaline, even at REALLY close range, I could see myself missing. Your Glock 17C is a fine piece of machinery for competition target shooting. It is a great pistol. The salesman told me that for the small price difference, he always recommended compensated guns because of their accuracy. As an untrained shooter, at a distance of 50 feet or so, I was hitting a coffee can on a fence post at least 50% of the ti…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 07:20 PM
1

Good point. But let's say I fire off a couple rounds in the dark, missing. Instead of sounding like I'm firing a handgun, it will sound like I'm firing a shotgun. I have never heard such a loud handgun in my life. (Not to say I have the vast experience of some of my fellow Redditors)
/r/MensRights27/08/09 06:53 PM
0

You obviously have little to no understanding of the mechanical function of your weapon, I admit you have me here. and that is proof in and of itself that you cannot safely handle it. No. It's proof of no such thing. I'm going to say this as nicely as possible. I have never needed to have the safety on and was thus oblivious to the fact that there is none. I have also only fired roughly 100 practice rounds, have never cleaned the gun (in the nine years I've owned it) and keep the clips loaded, d…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 06:49 PM
0

There is a little slider that is on both sides. I have never taken the gun apart but that looks like the slide release. Then there is another little thumb button thingy on the left side. I'll admit, on closer examination neither looks like a very convenient safety. But there are two slides/levers on the left side.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 07:45 AM
4

The one I have come to respect is monkihed because I have attacked her and she has come back civilly several times. She can debate the feminist side without sounding like an uptight bitch. /Equality ought to make her a mod and ban all the current mods. Holding my breath in 3 ... 2...
/r/MensRights27/08/09 05:45 AM
2

I didn't get "Doubt". I got "King of Comedy" instead of "Shampoo". You'd think I'd pay more attention. If you truly want to keep me at bay, I'd recommend the unholy trimuvirate: "Breaker Breaker", "Independence Day" and of course, "Billy Jack". And by the way, I know as much as you and I have talked about film, I've never told you my "favorite film" rule. If someone tells me that something is their favorite, I have to watch it if I haven't already seen it. I figure if someone, even with the wors…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 04:48 AM
0

Obviously I know about the trigger safety but there IS an external switch on the left side. I have never engaged it but if it's not a safety, then what is it?
/r/MensRights27/08/09 04:44 AM
0

I have a good memory for people I detest.
/r/MensRights27/08/09 04:36 AM
2

I would be honored to be added to your list but at 5'6", your midget entry already has me partially covered. But I guarantee, certain Redditors will NOT break in to your place. There's a scene in "Unforgiven" where a posse is being formed and one of them is a one-armed man named Lefty. He is decking himself with gunbelts, ammo, and at least three pistols. When he is admonished for overkill, he replies with a line that has always stuck with me. "I just don't want to get killed for lack of shootin…
/r/MensRights27/08/09 12:17 AM
5

We need to get the name of this judge. MRAs everywhere need to know.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:59 PM
3

I agree. So let's keep the identity of ALL defendants anonymous, no matter what crime they're accused of. Or, we can publicize the identity of all sex crime accusers because after all, sexual offences should not be distinguished from other types of crime.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:56 PM
-1

I don't understand how so many people assume that only men can identify or talk about the ridiculous things a lot of women do to men. For every Ladyskins (cool female), there is a Saydrah, DOGA, Aerik, gingerroot, mooshiga, jpfbookworm, xzxzzx, BritishEnglishPolice, Hangly, etc. (misandrist pile of garbage) It's a numbers game. Sorry, Lady.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:52 PM
-1

I keep my Glock 17C on my nightstand. Loaded, chambered, safety off. If someone breaks into my house, I'd recommend they get to me as fast as possible. I figure if I just woke up I might hesitate as much as five seconds in the confusion.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:43 PM
3

So, when is Ann going to delete this?
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:15 PM
-1

You're a mod of /Equality. You're not interested in discourse or conversation. You're afraid of facts and statistics. You're a lying hypocrite. Male or female, I'd like to beat you within an inch of your life. How's that for civility? Fuck off and die.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:11 PM
2

The comments are hilarious. I love that retards think Ben is attacking this poor lady and trying to make her look bad. There's some CHIVALRY for you! I guess only men are allowed to be disparaged in the media. This woman is a golddigging whore, according to everyone who knows her. She's clearly a little unhinged as well. I just hope Ben countersues her to pay for his legal fees. Put her on the streets where she belongs.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 11:08 PM
2

This isn't about being drunk, you misandrist dullard. It's about stupid people who don't say no because they don't know how. I would have thought there weren't really people that inept but your pet troll Aerik told a story like that once.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 10:53 PM
0

To top it all off some people don't know how to say no, and others know how to exploit that. I guess being a moderator of /lmfaoequality doesn't require reading comprehension skills. Big surprise.
/r/MensRights26/08/09 08:09 PM
10

Are men supposed to develop telepathy now to avoid rape charges?
/r/MensRights25/08/09 08:43 PM
0

You either don't know what "reactionary" means or you don't pay attention to the agenda around here. Maybe both.
/r/MensRights25/08/09 12:32 AM
5

The first feminist thing about our wedding was the nature of the proposal. I do not believe that men have to propose to women, but neither did I feel comfortable proposing myself. Is it just me or does that make her a total hypocrite? If he had said yes, how would I ever have believed he wanted it as much as me, rather than saying yes to keep me quiet? Good point. I suppose he could have made the same argument. Then again, I guess I'll be able to make this argument for life. After many conversat…
/r/MensRights25/08/09 12:22 AM
0

Your sarcasm is duly noted, troll. Believe me, if you weren't such a misandrist, you WOULD see the relevance. But as it is, noone. NOONE. Cares about your opinion around here.
/r/MensRights25/08/09 12:14 AM
-1

Wow, where do I sign up for your viewing audience, Dr Phil? It must be awesome to boil the entirety of human experience down to neat little formulae like you do. I see we have another misandrist troll.
/r/MensRights23/08/09 01:23 AM
1

I agreed with the author until she got to Semenya. You either have to let everyone compete against everyone in athletics, which would be the death of the female athlete or keep men and women strictly isolated from one another. I don't know what the criteria are for determining who and what a woman is but someone has to decide what they are and then strictly adhere to them. I wont deny that there might be rare cases where someone IS discriminated against but what's the alternative. And by the way…
/r/MensRights22/08/09 10:40 AM
2

I agree, RM, but it wouldn't be nearly as bad if the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a civil case wasn't lower than for a prosecutor in a criminal case. Witness Ben Roethlisberger. I would say that just from the physical evidence that's been released, there's a 99% chance he's innocent but supposedly he still stands a good chance of losing his case.
/r/MensRights22/08/09 10:33 AM
10

Unfortunately, still just as relevant.
/r/MensRights22/08/09 12:09 AM
-4

Fuck off, troll. Who do you think you speak for around here?
/r/MensRights21/08/09 02:26 PM
9

And once again, just like with Andrea McNulty and Ben Roethlisberger, the accused is named and shamed while the accuser gets to hide behind anonymity. Fortunately, men have had enough of this double standard and people are actively rooting out these women's identities. This case has other similarities as well. In both cases, the accuser waited two years to file a civil suit. For money. In McNulty's case, she refused to press criminal charges and in this case, we have a DA who is still deciding t…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 09:33 PM
14

I disagree with women being given an easier set of criteria. However, for the same reason I also disagree with making it easier on older people. If this is for desk work or administrative work, a physical fitness test isn't necessary. If it is for street cops, then why should age or gender be an excuse for a lower standard. I also can't believe the differences in the mile and a half times. I wouldn't mind giving women a tiny edge there because of height (but then you're discriminating against sh…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 09:26 PM
-5

Just so you know, I know why.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 06:50 PM
2

I can't read the article. NYT never lets me in without registering and deleting my cookies has no effect.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 06:16 PM
11

10% of what she should get in the States. However, I've been told that men do much smaller sentences for rape in the UK so this is less of a travesty by proportionate comparison.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 06:15 PM
-5

I find it disturbing that you apparently don't know the definition of misogyny. I also find it disturbing that you are posting using a sockpuppet account. Would you care to refute or debate any of the three quotes of mine you listed?
/r/MensRights20/08/09 06:12 PM
4

OK, well I appreciate that we see eye-to-eye on so many of these issues that I hold important. But that kind of brings me back to the label of feminist. I had already heard the various subcategories of feminism but I'm not really familiar with what their belief systems all are. Because noone, including you, uses them. If there is one branch of feminism that agrees with you and I about all of those bullet points and another branch that doesn't, then I would tell those two groups of people that pe…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:57 PM
-5

Wow. You are utterly ignorant and don't know what you're talking about. Our society and culture are biased against men at every avenue, which smarter men than you have realized a long time ago. A gelded sheep like you is as far from a real man as could ever be found. Baaa on back to your shepherds, boy. The wolves are out here.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:41 PM
1

The ERA has been brought to my attention before. Just read that entire article. I find it interesting that it was opposed by labor unions in the 50s, whoses male membership opposed it because they didn't want competition from female employees, and then ... Opponents of the ERA, employed in the industrial sector, feared the passage of the amendment would nullify protective labor laws for women. Members of the Women's Trade Union League put immense effort into fighting the ERA in an effort to pres…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:38 PM
2

•I want you to be able to be seen near children without suspicion and accusation. •I want you to not fall victim to lies and manipulation and a court system that favors a false reporter while the public tries and convicts an innocent man. •I want prison sentences for both genders to be equal. •I want treatment of criminals to be equal and gender-blind. •Rape of men is not and will never be funny. •Alimony had historical relevance when women could not work, but in the modern world it is usually a…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 07:06 AM
3

Do you accept "IF a draft is enforced, it should be across both genders"? Back up for just a second. I'm not talking about a hypothetical draft being enforced. I'm talking about the very real registration for that draft that is required every single day. I am talking about combat duty which women are exempt from while they demand equal pay and equal opportunities for promotion. This isn't Playboy centerfolds on the wall at a construction site. This is men being killed. Every day. Whether you are…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 07:00 AM
4

The comments and slants on stories make me feel hated by people who loudly proclaim to know what I want because I'm a feminist, while having no idea about what I actually believe in. This is an old rant of mine. What DO you believe? And if you do believe in equality and fairness, and the word "feminist" has negative connotations to a lot of people here, why not self-identify as an equalist or an egalitarian? I am not saying you're lying. I'm not even saying you're wrong. But you'd have to show m…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 06:07 AM
3

As far as the sentencing thing goes, would you apply the same standard to any act of perjury? We're not punishing false rape accusers for perjury in my ideal circumstances. Of course, in the real world, we can't even be bothered to charge them with a misdemeanor of filing a false police report. We are punishing false rape accusers for attempted kidnapping. Or whatever you'd like. We would have to make up a new set of laws for this of course. But let me ask you something. As a man. Answer honestl…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:58 AM
1

I feel that if you had posted in a rational and thoughtful way, even expressing an unpopular opinion, you might have been surprised. I think it's unfair to judge a subreddit based on how you think you might have been treated. You may have seen other women treated badly here and I'll admit that's usually how it goes. But in my experience, either they have a history here and in the other gender-based subreddits or they're morons... or both. There are two or three women who post here occasionally. …
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:23 AM
1

The problem I have with your approach, in short, is that you're operating under the same label as me. Which means every time I describe myself as MRA, people act surprised that I'm so goshdarn nice and reasonable. I have to say that I find that comment a little condescending. Do I owe you a certain set of behaviors so you can get a nice, friendly greeting here at Reddit? No offense but I've been here every day for a long time. I think this is the first day I've ever seen you... If a woman said t…
/r/MensRights20/08/09 05:16 AM
4

Welcome to this subreddit, Maplealmond. There are other guys here who may be interested in your drop of honey approach. I am not. I think there is room in this movement for your philosophy and mine. Whenever the subject of rape comes up (far too often), I would simply ask a woman what should be done to false accusers of rape. I would then ask if accused perpetrators should be given the same umbrella of anonymity that alleged victims are given. I would then ask if a rapist should be convicted on …
/r/MensRights20/08/09 04:48 AM
5

I noticed that too. A woman complaining about the situation and using female examples of the bad things that can happen. Hey lady, at least you're not constantly suspected of wrongdoing even before you engage or interact with a child.
/r/MensRights20/08/09 01:30 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/worstof/comments/9bhjj/yeah_the_mensrights_subreddit_is_totally_about/ A random coward, incapable of debate, ran and submitted this to /worstof like a thief in the night.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 09:23 PM
1

I know one reason I personally get more outraged at crimes committed by women. I know beyond a reasonable doubt that they are not going to be subjected to the same level of criminal punishment. And as the first commenter pointed out, misandry IS sexism. Among other things, they cut off the tips of some of this little boy's fingers... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P Just five minutes alone...
/r/MensRights19/08/09 06:21 PM
29

Fish factory worker Edwards Must ... not ... make ... obvious and easy jokes about lesbians. But she admitted being drunk and said vodka 'made her horrible' and that she 'became violent'. Delaney, who arrived at court swigging a can of beer, said she was an alcoholic and Pawson admitted she had been 'ten out of ten' for drunkenness. All of these factors would be irrelevant if these were male perpetrators. Once again, we see women attempting to shirk responsibility. The trio admitted assault and …
/r/MensRights19/08/09 05:26 PM
2

Does anyobody know more about this rape case? Google is worthless, as usual.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 05:11 PM
3

That is NOT why I put clincher in quotes! I did it because that's what you called it, NOT because that's NOT how you spelled it... if that makes sense. Feel free to change it if it makes you feel better. I don't think he is advocating that position. I think he is mocking it and by proxy subscribing feminism to it. All of that is total bullshit. No one should be held to a higher or lesser standard because of their gender. I totally agree and as far as I know, that's how everyone else (or almost e…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 04:27 PM
1

Thank you for answering the question. I could be wrong but it was probably a feminist who downvoted me. I doubt any MRA would. We certainly have MRAs who never upvote anybody (and I know who...) but it's normally one of my fan club who follows me around, downvoting everything I say.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 04:24 PM
1

Noone agrees with your statements more than me, Brunt, but those are not excuses for racism. And I guess Oliveretto is entitled to his opinion. But Soapergem is right to call him out for them and I hope more MRAs do as well.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 04:08 PM
2

Wow. Well, let me say that I kind of agree with his "clincher". I see what he was going for about the disparity between female rights and female responsibility. I'm not sure how well he expressed it but I THINK I see where he was going. It becomes tougher to give him the benefit of the doubt about his racism when he called Nigeria "Niggeria". Full disclosure - I got called out once for calling someone a "faggot" on these boards. I don't consider myself a homophobe but I can't guarantee I'll neve…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 04:06 PM
5

Her apologists later claimed that the "all sex is rape, all men are rapists" quote is a paraphrase that misrepresented her position. I haven't read any of her books and I don't know if I could ever slog my way through any of them. Here is a wikipedia quote, for what it's worth. Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women Here is a link to some of Dworkin's writing in 1987's "Intercourse". http://faculty.uccb.ns.ca/sstewart/sexlove/dworkin.htm I got about halfw…
/r/MensRights19/08/09 03:55 PM
2

I'm sure you all know Aerik, /lmfaoequality's #1 troll? Aerik, whose gender is a matter of debate for me, once told me that he/she had been raped by a person who asked repeatedly and Aerik finally consented because it had been worn down. There was no threats of violence, no blackmail. Just begging and pleading. So Aerik capitulates and was "raped".
/r/MensRights19/08/09 03:39 PM
0

Can you tell me where that quote is in that blog you linked to? I read for five minutes and still couldn't find it.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 03:33 PM
6

Dude, can you please explain this comment? I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt and figure out if you were being sarcastic here. It's not very obvious if you were.
/r/MensRights19/08/09 03:32 PM
8

As you get older and more mature, you'll find it gets easier to admit you were wrong. Good luck to you.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 04:13 PM
6

You responded to walugi. He asked about only women. When you replied, you were AUTOMATICALLY talking about only women yourself. I know what my Reddit reputation is, far better than you I assure you. I find it amusing that people think they can put me in a little box with a one-word label. That is their failing, not mine. I am not getting moody with you or even trying to be rude. But you are being cagey about what you said and what you meant.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 04:04 PM
7

Make sure you guys visit this human flotsam's comment. http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/9bou3/texas_mom_gets_99_years_for_cutting_off_sons/c0c5hl6
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:43 PM
8

Are you saying women never are getting fair treatment? Because I AM saying that they always whine as if they weren't.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:39 PM
1

The sad thing is, Pierce, I'm a bit of a spineless hypocrite because I act like a knight in shining armor to women when I'm first dating them. But, average women on the street? I agree with you... they've had enough doors held for them in their lives.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:27 PM
7

Like walugi said...
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:19 PM
5

Admittedly, a prejudicial bias of mine. About a decade ago I worked in a restaurant in a casino in Laughlin, Nevada. The food and beverage director was male but all of the restaurant managers and supervisors were female, with one exception. So we're talking like 19 females and one male. The three managers were all female and were in charge of hiring the supervisors. One was a man-hating lesbian, one was a man-hating woman of dubious sexuality and the last was fairly nice to everyone, also of dub…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:17 PM
17

The thing I have observed from admittedly VERY limited personal anecdotal experience is that female bosses play favorites. I have been on the good end and the bad end of this but either way I think it is bad for overall leadership and morale. And this is heterosexual women. Lesbian women should not be allowed in charge of any workplace where males are.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:47 PM
-2

There's only one combination that doesn't match, and that's the one feminists would like to change. That is the comment I'm referring to. And whether you personally think that the female way is the "right" way is irrelevant because you correctly pointed out that feminists, by and large, do.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:33 PM
2

If you're familiar with oconostota's recent comment history, that divorce has hit him pretty hard. I think he should be forgiven for his misogyny because it's understandable. Give him a little time and it will subside some. He DOESN'T make the rest of us look bad and he doesn't owe any of us anything anyway. I used to hold the door for EVERYONE. Then I read a letter to Dear Abby where some old person was complaining about how rude the younger generation was. I then noticed that younger people wo…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 12:45 PM
7

I believe I sense a hint of patronizing sarcasm here and there. I'm not sure how to take this article.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 12:39 PM
4

Wow. Good luck with the lawyer. IANAL and I could be full of shit but California's divorce laws are notoriously pro-female so I hope you enjoyed that house... I HOPE I'm wrong. Maybe I am. Ugh. Should you turn yourself in or wait to see the lawyer? I can see pros and cons to both arguments. I hope someone more knowledgable than me can advise you tonight.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 04:25 AM
11

I still think this is good advice. An innocent person acts outraged. Act innocent (which you are).
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:45 AM
6

We need more details. How old are these daughters? How old is your son? How long have you been married? How long have you lived in California? What did the police say to you? What property do you own? How much income do you and she make? Do either of you use drugs? Do you have relatives that live close by, especially parents? What's causing this flareup? Have either of you ever cheated where the other can prove it? You REALLY do need to take the advice of several other commenters and hire a lawy…
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:40 AM
1

Don't give me credit for stealing from Tarantino... where he was more or less stealing from the Bible. :) This isn't the place for eloquence anyway, QNX. Make your voice heard around here. A heartfelt sentiment beats flowery superlatives here at /MensRights.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:32 AM
5

Sheer stupidity and unadulterated anger.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:28 AM
6

It isn't feminists' business what men think and it isn't their right to change it. It is the height of presumptuousness to even suggest it. The female way is not the "right" way, as several more eloquent posters than me have already stated.
/r/MensRights18/08/09 01:26 AM
1

What about being ogled by a man you find attractive? How relatively attractive would you say you are? If you are either attractive overall or have at least one particularly nice feature, I sure hope you don't dress to accentuate it. Because that would make you a bit of a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 11:26 PM
-1

Look at this guy's bizarre user history. He has NEVER made a comment. But has 2,985 karma. I wonder what he gets out of Reddit. What enjoyment does he derive? Oh, well to each his own. He isn't a blogspammer.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 10:50 PM
3

I'm not as good a friend or a son as I'd like to be. I am closed-minded at times and argumentative. I am overly emotional and volatile. I am selfish and usually unfocused and undisciplined. But I AM that guy you want by your side walking down a dark alley. And as Jules said to Ringo in "Pulp Fiction"... "And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be a shepherd."
/r/MensRights17/08/09 09:56 PM
6

I had a creative writing 100 level English class in college where the (female) professor taught essentially NOTHING but Sylvia Plath. The only thing we studied the whole semester that WASN'T Plath was a short story about a woman whose husband has died and she's overjoyed. It was disgusting. I WILL give her credit though. I got an A in the class and I basically attacked the professor vocally and in all my term papers. It was almost like she found my protestations cute and amusing, a novelty act. …
/r/MensRights17/08/09 09:20 PM
8

Your entire reply is perfect but especially this... So why is the female method for how we think of others correct? Why not the male one? This is a recurring theme in the gender wars. Women wanting to frame the male perception and the male experience through their own mindset. It is the height of hypocrisy and the ultimate vanity to try to tell someone else that the way they think or feel is invalid. Friended. Which means I upvote everything I see you say from here on out, even if I disagree (wh…
/r/MensRights17/08/09 06:39 PM
1

First, if my ex-husband had cleaned, cooked, and made it his life's mission to stay attractive and relevant to me, if he treated his SAHD duties as more than babysitting, it would have been like a traditional marriage. So you're saying he not only didn't work, but he barely did anything around the house? I think if you were a man OR a woman, you're suddenly a lot more righteous being resentful. I suppose a lot depends on what agreements you two came to when you got married. And I'll be honest. I…
/r/MensRights17/08/09 06:32 PM
13

I upvoted you but you're giving this advice to the wrong guy. There are other MRAs here who might be more philosophically attuned to what you're saying but I am angry and I am a fighter. I have never turned the other cheek and I hope I never do.
/r/MensRights17/08/09 04:08 PM
5

See? Feels good, doesn't it!?
/r/MensRights17/08/09 02:07 PM
0

He refused to get a job while we were married -- said everything was either beneath him, or totally unattainable without 5-8 years of school. This was an excuse, a way of removing himself from accountability. Reverse the genders though and you have a typical marriage. I'm a feminist who has a real stake in men's rights You call yourself a feminist yet resented a man who wanted to lay around and do nothing on your dime. That should have been empowering, no? The word feminist is a dirty word to me…
/r/MensRights17/08/09 02:04 PM
28

Loved this comment Meh, nothing about this article tells me anything new to be honest. I don't like the idea of strip clubs because I've got this feeling that the commodification of sexuality has got to be a bad thing, and that if men get used to the idea that women should always be sexually available to them then that's going to skew their views of sexuality and make it difficult for them to act normally around women. So this is a woman debating the virtues of sexual commodification because of …
/r/MensRights17/08/09 01:35 PM
2

That is an excellent point and a great analogy. Isn't catching people being hypocritical fun?
/r/MensRights16/08/09 06:37 PM
1

He should be getting parental approval for all platonic meetups with a 13 year old. I'd be willing to bet they got chat logs where the transcripts probably had him making incriminating comments.
/r/MensRights16/08/09 06:09 PM
4

I had a boss years ago make me work Thanksgiving AND Christmas while female employees got the day off. Because they had families. The boss was female of course. Then the Super Bowl came along and she tried to say she was running a lottery to determine who got it off. I informed her in front of about fifty employees that I would be getting it off to pay me back for working holidays. She was mad, a man-hating lesbian, but she knew I'd haul her ass to human resources if I didn't get my way.
/r/MensRights16/08/09 06:07 PM
-3

http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/050411/050411_dworkin_hmed_6p.hmedium.jpg This lovely flower claimed she was raped at least three times. Of course she also claimed that all heterosexual sex in our patriarchal society is coercive and degrading to women, and sexual penetration may by its very nature doom women to inferiority and submission and Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women so perhaps we should take her definition of rape with a…
/r/MensRights16/08/09 01:14 PM
5

Don't crosspost. I guess I'd first ask "why not"? I guess I'd then ask why you think you have the right to boss us around. I also think your question is too broad and too general to be discussed seriously in this format. It doesn't matter what conclusions you arrive at. Feminists will take advantage of the answer either way. Women are way too empathetic and kind-hearted to be forced into conscription, combat duty, or dangerous or dirty jobs. That's also why they should get to steal our kids beca…
/r/MensRights16/08/09 10:42 AM
2

And the paternity tests are getting cheaper and cheaper. Not that cost should ever have been an obstacle but I'd love to hear the rationale of anyone arguing against this.
/r/MensRights16/08/09 10:26 AM
10

I would say that a man who is being defrauded and deceived about paternity is suffering one of the most despicable things one human can do to another. I see what you're saying but I'd equate it with saying only 1 in 25 men is a rapist or 1 in 25 people are murderers. I think a woman who has reasonable suspicion that a man may not be the father of a child, should be legally compelled to tell him, at both criminal and civil risk otherwise. Either way, excellent submission.
/r/MensRights16/08/09 01:08 AM
10

From the second comment... However, some studies show that men who are confident in their paternity are only wrong in 2-3% of cases. I've read 4% at least twice but let's assume the commenter is right. ONLY!?!? Only 1 in 50 women is commiting the most vile kind of deception imaginable, stealing 18 years worth of resources and in many cases depriving a man of his own biological imperative to pass along his genes. Only? If you have ANY doubt at all, INSIST on a paternity test.
/r/MensRights16/08/09 12:45 AM
-7

Her default reaction to men is to mistrust. That is prejudiced and biased right there. She then wonders why men think it's OK to be prejudiced themselves. She cites individual incidents as justification for this mistrust, then she diminishes the actions of women that might make men equally distrustful. She clearly has daddy issues as well as boyfriend issues. Any woman so sensitive and so vigilant for anything she can be offended by that she asks other people to use "gender neutral" language is …
/r/MensRights15/08/09 10:33 PM
4

I appear to be in the minority here. I don't have a problem with this sentence at all. I suppose if I had any problem with it, it would be that women who actually succeed in having sex with 13 year old boys don't do 17 days in jail. I'm not denying that, as a 35 year old man, I would probably have sex with a 17 or even a 16 year old if given the perfect set of circumstances. But to me there is an infinite gap between a 16 year old and a 13 year old. No adult man needs to be having sex with 13 ye…
/r/MensRights15/08/09 10:58 AM
7

bioest That's how she spells biased. She's retarded.
/r/MensRights15/08/09 09:32 AM
7

(20:22:38) (@) Bєץא (@): i guess youll try and tell me theres just as many female domestic abusers as men lol (20:23:45) Robin: No. The percentage is around (can't remember exact figures) 65% of domestic abuse is against women, 35% against men This is wrong. Women DO commit more domestic violence than men.
/r/MensRights15/08/09 09:31 AM
2

Neither of your sentences is relevant at all. You've been a user for one day. See my response to Elethiomel for an expanded discussion of why this is relevant here.
/r/MensRights14/08/09 08:57 PM
6

I think it's relevant. As I've explained 100 times, /MensRights is actually a haven for anything that relates to men here at Reddit. Since idiots here at Reddit frequently like to claim how misogynistic Reddit is in general, I think it's interesting to see misandrists in action, especially male misandrists. If YOU don't like it, downvote it and move on. I do like it, think it is relevant and I am glad ladyskins posted it here.
/r/MensRights14/08/09 08:56 PM
2

India’s Penal Code in 1983 which says that a husband or relative of a husband who is found to subject the wife to cruelty would be punished by imprisonment of up to three years and a hefty fine. The police can immediately arrest the husband and in-laws when a women complains. and then... However, Girija Vyas, chairwoman of the National Commission for Women, said: “I would not like to use the term misuse. There is lack of awareness amongst people that is exploited by lawyers and police. We feel t…
/r/MensRights14/08/09 03:33 PM
1

Well, a mother already can opt out, at least in the US. I'd say let the man opt out all through the pregnancy and maybe six months to a year through the life of the infant, as long as he has been given plenty of notification that he is the father. I also think paternity tests should be mandatory. And once either parent is in, they're in. Human relation-ships are complicated matters, BSC. Don't you agree? You can spend a lifetime getting to know one person and never know everything. When you imag…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 10:13 PM
2

I don't know what the timeline should be, Cass, but it shouldn't be for long and once a man has opted in, he should not be able to opt out.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:38 PM
6

11 If I have children and provide primary care for them, I’ll be praised for extraordinary parenting if I’m even marginally competent. Anecdotal. Unprovable. 12 If I have children and a career, no one will think I’m selfish for not staying at home. This is very similar to #10. They'll think you're selfish FOR staying at home. Meanwhile, a woman is free to choose whatever she likes. 13 If I seek political office, my relationship with my children, or who I hire to take care of them, will probably …
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:35 PM
2

But Ann, if you're saying it's beneath our contempt or rebuttal, you're saying what those dipshits say to me when they're afraid of discourse. Annihilate.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:19 PM
5

What is needed is simple: men must have a legal way of abdicating all rights and responsibilities for a child. Its the lack of this ability that makes the situation so perverse. Here, you and I are in TOTAL agreement. Everything else is just semantics. It's also the only solution that is not, itself perverse. Otherwise, you are either asking that a man can force a woman to undergo a traumatic and invasive surgical procedure against her will (an abortion), or carry a child to term against her wil…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:18 PM
6

I think the general consensus here at /MensRights is that we want the right to celebrate our masculinity any way we choose, free from gender roles that society or culture thrusts upon us. Speaking for myself, as a fairly macho guy, I think that is ideal. Let each man be himself and pursue his happiness in whatever way he thinks best. I think women should be entitled to those same rights. The equality to be as unequal as we like. You're interesting. You should stick around.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:15 PM
8

Crio3mo brought this to my attention here. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9a0pc/womens_studies_the_truth_pic/c0bymi0 1 My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/99s74/women_now_outnumber_men_in_the_most_high_status/ Kanara begs to differ. 2 I can be confident that my co-workers won’t think I got my job because of…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 09:06 PM
5

Relevant and correct. Wow, off to a bad start already. HUH!? Citation needed. ONE example would be fine. And let me just say, even if you come up with one, this is really a reach. Nonsensical. Who asks for special protection from crime? But I will tell you this. Men are twice as likely to be the victims of violent crime. Women commit more domestic violence than men yet there are special shelters for victims of domestic violence where men are not allowed. Men who commit violent crimes do much lon…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:40 PM
1

You're a hard one to get a peg on. I am an anti-feminist. Please define.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:25 PM
-2

Totally irrelevant. The only thing those MINIMAL risks would earn a woman is a right to not go through those risks. They already have that right. Once a woman has made the choice to have a child, those risks were incurred by her and should have no bearing on the rights of a potential father.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:23 PM
0

First of all, congratulations on having the stupidest username in the history of Reddit. Second, congratulations on getting to page 2 of ladder theory/PUA techniques. You've really conquered your misogyny. Now fuck off and go troll somewhere else, dork.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:17 PM
8

Concentrating on the rights of men and being anti-feminist are not only not exclusionary, they are almost synonymous. That's unfortunate but that's the way it is. Many feminists will lie right to your face that they're interested in equality/egalitarianism. 95% of them are not. I've honestly decided many of them are lying to themselves as well. Feminism is a movement for female supremacy. It wasn't always this way, they once had noble goals. Once they achieved those, they wanted more and more an…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:13 PM
3

If feminism is a male's biggest concern, then they aren't interested in equality, they're interested in not losing their male privilege. What male privilege is that again? You got here just in time, my friend. Stick around. You might learn something.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:10 PM
7

Interested in reactionary movements? Chronically outraged? Not too good at debating and completely uneducated on the issues? Like making up statistics? Believe in equality as long as we're talking rights for women and not rights for anyone else or responsibilities for women? Feminism is for you!
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:08 PM
2

I disagree. But I could see where your viewpoint comes from.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:16 PM
2

Why is it acceptable and celebrated when a woman says "I'm not a fit mother, and I want to let someone else do it." But when a man says the same thing he's a deadbeat dad? Absolutely perfect.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:15 PM
4

as though being a slut is somehow a bad thing I agree. I've never understood that and it's one of the VERY FEW things feminists complain about that is legitimate. even if I were a lesbian, assuming that I'm a bitter man-hating misandrist—and suggesting that all lesbians are—is just absurd. I would never suggest that all lesbians are misandrists. I would suggest that the vast majority are, based on my own limited anecdotal evidence. I also fail to see how that would make it none of my business, s…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:15 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/offbeat/comments/8b7gf/woman_attacked_on_subway_platform_as_workers/
/r/MensRights12/08/09 04:12 PM
5

everybody has got their manpanties all bunched up in knots Now, how should I interpret this line? It's feminine to complain? You think "whiny" males are demasculated? As I've already stated, and I wont state again... Just because that isn't how YOU intended it, does not mean the entire /women subreddit gets to hide under your umbrella. The fact that emmster deleted lonelycatlady's response has robbed the discussion of a lot of context. But when lonelycatlady says that it's antifeminist for women…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 03:54 PM
6

They don't necessarily reject responsibility. They might embrace it, based on the CHOICE the women make. Women can make any choice they like and they certainly have to face the responsibilities (somewhat) of the choices they make. But the keyword is choice. A choice men don't get to make at any step in the process. But men certainly DO get to bear equal (or greater than equal) responsibility for the choices women make. Women pick and choose their responsibilities. Or shirk them altogether. A res…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 03:40 PM
7

You're not understanding who emmster is accusing of being a troll. Lonelycatlady was already there before the rest of us showed up. She is accusing ME of being a troll. As for you and your anecdote, noone should have helped you but you needed help. You were unable to help yourself. You were emotionally abused by a total stranger. If you had been male, noone would have helped you. Because you were female and 19, a guy who wanted to fuck you was hitting on you ineptly and exploiting your vulnerabi…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 03:34 PM
4

The person in the booth DID do something. They summoned help. I'm not saying what the article itself said. I'm saying what the Reddit comments said. And there was strong condemnation of the male employee's character and masculinity because he chose not to personally intervene.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 01:54 PM
1

Where was this first discussed in /MR? I hate that Tomek changed this into a marriage contract when basically all we do in here all day is try to get men to shy away from marriage (which I agree with, BTW).
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:15 AM
19

To prove what you're saying, let's dissect this laughable comment by Saydrah here. http://www.reddit.com/r/Equality/comments/99ei5/what_do_you_think_of_this_new_marriage_contract/ I don't like this idea because it allows men to produce a child without an obligation to that child. Right. We don't want men to have the same rights women currently have. That means only women have to take responsibility for the risks of having sex. Women have to take NO responsibility. This is a typical Saydrah lie. …
/r/MensRights12/08/09 08:13 AM
9

The damsel in distress thing is extremely beneficial to both genders How is it beneficial to males? To be killed/maimed so some woman can escape from harm? So basically you're all for equality except the kinds of equality you don't like? Nobody gives a fuck what offends your delicate sensibilities here, I assure you. What I'm curious about is whether your sister feminists would be as disconcerted by your skewed views of what it is to be a woman as I am. Men owe you NOTHING.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 07:57 AM
0

The baby was probably physically and emotionally abusive. This poor woman was left with no choice.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:25 AM
8

Sorry that you actually might have to hear voices of dissent in your subreddit. How uncivil of us to disagree with you.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:23 AM
19

There was the subway employee a couple of months ago who called for help but didn't leave his kiosk when a woman was being attacked. The comments here at Reddit made clear that feminists expect disposable men to come to their aid whenever they're in distress. Equal rights, NEVER equal responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:06 AM
9

To disagree with anything you say is to be a troll? That's convenient. Stifle dissent and silence debate by silencing trolls. What a perfect set-up. If this comment thread is any indication of the overall tone of your subreddit, it is a nest of misandry. And if your self-righteous urge to censor is any indication of your overall moderator skillset, perhaps you should see if Saydrah and Xzxzzx need you in /Equality. And we deal with cowardly downvoters en masse here at /MensRights DAILY. Not mont…
/r/MensRights12/08/09 05:03 AM
3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler Or cold-blooded, first degree homicide.
/r/MensRights12/08/09 03:55 AM
0

He and Saydrah are guilty of the same crimes. They both admitted that I should have been allowed back in Equality. That they were wrong to ban me. However, they were both too lazy to just do it for the sake of doing the right thing. Xzxzzx cried about how he would have to face a backlash. In other words, he is too fearful and gutless to be a mod as well as too lazy. Neither he or Saydrah have any integrity and then they both have the raw audacity and hyopcrisy to post here. They're both scumbag …
/r/MensRights11/08/09 03:58 AM
3

You're absolutely right. But he should sue her anyway. I think it would make it more obvious to people who are only peripherally familiar with the story that he is innocent. It would also be highly publicized and let women know that there are consequences for this course of action.
/r/MensRights09/08/09 10:14 PM
3

PLEASE let this woman rot in prison forever.
/r/MensRights09/08/09 04:16 PM
5

No I don't. As I've stated elsewhere, I don't know that a person who was truly fearful would have come up with such a plan for self defense. I'm not saying he had a right to do what he allegedly did but her reaction back was an overreaction.
/r/MensRights08/08/09 05:48 PM
0

Thanks for that link. Great advice there.
/r/MensRights08/08/09 11:31 AM
4

They sure tell two wildly different stories. I guess we better wait until some third person corroborates one version or the other.
/r/MensRights08/08/09 06:18 AM
0

Sorry, dude. I'll try to pick it up so that my comments are more interesting to you. Maybe blather on and on about some sweet XBox games? See, you'd be wrong anywhere. You should be used to that by now, being a stupid fucking moron. But here at Reddit, you're doubly wrong. See, we can downvote what we like here and not read it. Because of that, noone gives a fuck what you individually think. Read that again. Noone cares about you and your ill-informed opinions on NFL football and Crysis. Downvot…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 12:56 PM
-1

Don't worry, you beta male, pussy, sunshine feminist gelding. Other men will fight this battle for you and you and your retarded sons can reap the benefits.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 12:47 PM
0

Then downvote and move on? I think it's relevant.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 11:51 AM
-1

Hey, thanks for dropping by. We'll see you again in another month. Maybe if you don't like /MR, you can fuck off. Your comment history, both at /MR and elsewhere, is filled with inanities and banality. I assure you, I have taken dumps smarter than you and your pathetic and completely unoriginal pseudoanalysis comes off as something a woman would say because she read it in Cosmo. You add nothing here or elsewhere. I know mommy taught you what a special little flower you are and that everyone's en…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 11:35 AM
-1

I responded to your last two comments at /MR. I can't help that you don't feel the need to contribute ANYTHING to this community and then somehow have the audacity to think your personal opinion about what should or should not be posted here is worthwhile to anyone. He was at -2 in about five minutes. I don't think that makes him a fucking crybaby. I'd say whining about what should be posted here makes you a crybaby. So I guess you and Pierce are even. EDIT - Correction, you fucking idiot. I res…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 11:22 AM
-1

Because most of the posts here have nothing to do with MR. You don't know what you're talking about. Why don't you look at all the top submissions when you click MensRights. See how 95% of them aren't like this? Oops. Yeah. You're talking out fo your ass. Since you never submit anything yourself and comment here every three weeks, I guess I just speak for myself when I ask... who gives a fuck what you think constitutes men's rights? Especially when the entire bulk of your comment history is whin…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 11:19 AM
3

Well, I know what you mean, Cass, but if she had really felt threatened, she would have done something more immediate like break a bottle over his head. Dousing someone with a flammable liquid and then igniting them doesn't sound to me like she felt very endangered. I'm not condoning his behavior either. He sounds like an idiot.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 09:40 AM
-1

Britain's Telegraph is reporting that a 26-year-old Greek woman is being hailed as a national hero after lighting a British man's genitals on fire as he sexually assaulted her in a bar on Crete. Later, the Briton took down his pants and waved his genitals at many of the women and then tried forcibly to get them to fondle him. That's "sexual assault"? But good for the Greeks. This is the first national hero they've had in at least two milennia.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:37 AM
4

Why should any man intervene for her? What do they owe her?
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:32 AM
8

Um, they're including men WITH CHILDREN. Meanwhile, ALL women. Well this is fair because after all, there are more women who are homeless... single men comprise 44 percent of the homeless, single women 13 percent, families with children 36 percent, and unaccompanied minors seven percent. http://www.policyalmanac.org/social_welfare/homeless.shtml Oh, never mind. Let's just keep assfucking men in one more area of society. Women are immune from conscription and also free of combat duty but still ma…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:23 AM
-1

Quality comment. Really, dude, please instruct others here on what they should be allowed to submit. Maybe see if kanuk876 will make you a mod.
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:11 AM
-2

It's called a WBB post. Since MBB posts are allowed and in fact posted by Saydrah at /Equality but WBB posts aren't allowed, I say they're welcome here. Where are your quality submissions? And I notice you never post here other than to ask why something is in /MR. Do you really think anyone should respect your opinion that this doesn't belong?
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:08 AM
0

It's called a WBB post. Since MBB posts are allowed and in fact posted by Saydrah at /Equality but WBB posts aren't allowed, I say they're welcome here. Where are your quality submissions?
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:05 AM
-1

Fantastic submission! Good find, Theoden. Women by nature aren’t on your side, the law isn’t on your side, and even lapdog beta males who’ve blinded themselves to reality and unthinkingly toe the PC party line in hopes their status posturing will offer them up a scrap or two of roadworn desiccated pussy don’t have your side as a man. There's a term for these pieces of filth. Sunshine feminists. Reddit is crawling with them. Witness the behavior of /Equality mod xzxzzx and our "man up" trolls lik…
/r/MensRights07/08/09 04:00 AM
2

No sweat, bro. You're an invaluable member of this community.
/r/MensRights06/08/09 04:29 AM
2

Upvoted. But as I explained to Etherspirit, you two are actually agreeing with each other and not seeing it.
/r/MensRights06/08/09 04:14 AM
2

Ether, I think that your two camps of MRAs is probably accurate. But those two camps are actually fighting for the exact same things ideologically. The thing we must stop is infighting by men who don't respect other men's choices. And you see a lot of that here at /MR. Like the misandrist retards who come in here and tell us collectively to "man up" and stop "whining". But it would be just as bad for me to say I DID want to man up and have another man tell me that's wrong. I've upvoted you and m…
/r/MensRights06/08/09 04:13 AM
2

I love the commenters who say men do this all the time. True! Because a custody court forces them. I'd just say this reinforces the fact that having a vagina doesn't automatically make you a superparent.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 09:14 PM
6

Men do more total work than women. Yet somehow, these blowhards want to try to interpret what is or is not harmful from our perspective and then also add to our workload with more "noble" housework.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 08:41 PM
2

The jurors are misandrist trash who are too stupid to see what man-hating filth they are. Did you want to refute Kestral or Oliverotto? Or just try to make them look stupid, all the while making yourself look like a fucking pseudodyke?
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:57 PM
7

Right. The difference is that the man would be starting his twenty year sentence right now. So you can try to deflect the issues with attacks on other people's character, when it's clear you're as big a hypocrite as anyone. What you or I or anyone else thinks doesn't matter. She walks scot free. Swap the genders and the man is fucked. Talk your way out of that one.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:55 PM
1

So using your terminology "lame" and "bad/worse/worst" are not even in the same category? If that's so, and I agree with that assertion, then the fact that he cheated on them is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 07:08 AM
1

cheating is the lamest shit ever I see your cheating and raise you a kidnapping and a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:13 AM
2

How is that relevant?
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:12 AM
0

The women in /Equality do. They think that's a punchline.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:12 AM
2

Yeah and when a man murders a man, he is tried and punished for murder. Women murder men and walk away. By the way, thank you for explaining to all of us dumb menfolk that bail is not a punishment up above. Since these women are charged with felonies, I wonder if you'd guess how often men get assessed $200 bail on felony charges.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:11 AM
1

In Nevada, the casino corporations fire employees on a whim. The casino-controlled media sold these rubes on Right To Work and they've been paying the price ever since. Then the same morons turn around and vote against labor unions.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 02:02 AM
-1

I'm a little tired of the Reddit hivemind bashing police every chance they get. I guess I have to ask how this is relevant to /MR.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 01:57 AM
0

WHere's the list of which country has the better wives? I promise that you could compose such a list using any reasonable criteria that would appeal to the average guy and American women would come in dead last every time. Take all time spent at work, doing house work and yard work, child care, and commuting and men outwork women. I'd say only the gender doing more work gets to complain about how the other gender spends their time.
/r/MensRights05/08/09 01:50 AM
3

His demands for a paternity test have angered the American model's family, who insist he is the father and said his behaviour was not up to the standards of an 'English gentleman'. This sounds like the women on the Maury Povich show who always insist they didn't sleep with anyone else. Roughly 50% of the time, they are proven to be liars.
/r/MensRights04/08/09 03:06 PM
3

Well 4% of men are raising children they think are theirs but aren't. That's 1 in 25. I think they should be mandatory to put a father on a birth certificate, with OR without his consent. A woman shouldn't be able to get a cent until a test is performed.
/r/MensRights04/08/09 03:01 PM
3

Great submission, Ocin. Obviously, I love the article and totally agree with everything he says... With one exception. This, incidentally, is the reason why slightly more boys than girls are born – 105 boys to 100 girls – so that there will be roughly 100 boys to 100 girls when they reach puberty. I'm going to need a citation here. I've read in two different books that more boys were born than girls throughout history... until the last century or so, where the balance has swung the other way. I …
/r/MensRights03/08/09 11:11 AM
2

Where you want women who are art and wine connoisseurs, I want women who appreciate great film, that would also tend to lead me to older women. However, I have found in one instance that if a woman has enough of an interest, you can teach her what you know and you've killed two birds with one stone. I suppose it depends on your age (I'm 35), what you want from a woman and personal taste.
/r/MensRights03/08/09 07:10 AM
11

You're exactly right. Women in their 30s, 40s, and 50s who can't get a man anymore, at least not one willing to throw himself on the marriage sword, lashing out at any target as an expression of their impotent fear and rage. Sorry, ladies. You're obsolete. The new models are sleeker, more beautiful and have fewer miles on them.
/r/MensRights03/08/09 01:15 AM
8

IANAL and I could easily be wrong but I believe that is a state-by-state matter.
/r/MensRights02/08/09 11:42 AM
11

You were giving great advice until this... he has no worries. Its just her word against his. This is what many men in prison for rape right now were convicted with. This guy shouldn't panic but I don't think he should relax either. If this is a smaller community and there are mutual friends/acquaintances, he needs to tell everyone that will listen his side of the story.
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:40 AM
5

Is the OP the guy we're talking about? How small a town do they live in?
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:38 AM
2

As a guy who has been accused of being a troll myself many times, excellently put. If someone is just a mindless troll, then shouldn't it be easy to quickly and decisively refute their ridiculous claims and then mock them with other like-minded people? If you're afraid to debate a troll, maybe you ought to reexamine how sound your arguments really are.
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:34 AM
1

Who would you rather vote for? A man that bangs hookers? Or a hooker that beats her husband? I'm quite skeptical that you wont have a third (instantly better) option come election time and I'm not from Louisiana anyway. After seeing the way women behaved when Obama won the Democratic nomination from Hilldog, I would need significant reason to vote for a woman over a man now, especially in a primary.
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:23 AM
2

Thanks for defending me. As I already said, you did it better than I ever could have.
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:18 AM
1

There's a reason we identify as MRAs instead of Masculists. Just as an aside, I find this interesting. So if I DO self-identify as a masculist, that means I'm not interested in equal rights or egalitarianism? So, how do you feel about people who call themselves feminists? The reality is that 80% or more of them are female supremacists but I wonder if you apply a double standard to those two terms. Redditbannedmeagain already defended me as well as I could have, and with more patience and eloquen…
/r/MensRights02/08/09 07:17 AM
-7

We need women to start doing 20 year prison sentences to get the attention of feminists. I hope they toss this woman in and lose the key, innocent or not.
/r/MensRights01/08/09 01:35 PM
3

Exercise (especially weights for me), good sleep habits and a healthy diet have all been very good for me as well. I would also urge guys who feel antisocial to go out and do things with your friends and family anyway. Depression breeds isolation which breeds depression... etc, etc.
/r/MensRights01/08/09 05:01 AM
0

Apparently, he is now too good (smart, cool, whatever) to go to strip clubs. So you were being sarcastic here? And you didn't answer my question about YOU going to strip clubs.
/r/MensRights01/08/09 04:56 AM
7

But Kuonji, haven't you heard? (This is the default argument by our feminist sisters, at least four of them have used this old canard.) "Conscription is unfair. Making women do it to would somehow be MORE unfair." I guess I would have to ask why it's unfair then if not because of its unequal application. Is the concept of conscription itself "fair"? I suppose it isn't really but you will NEVER do away with it. So it's here to stay. Arguing for it to be done away with is a distracting maneuver by…
/r/MensRights01/08/09 02:08 AM
8

You're saying "nay" and then essentially agreeing with Tomek. There was a documentary on strippers aboput ten years ago on one of the premium movie channels. These women UNANIMOUSLY hated men and couldn't believe how stupid men were for giving them money. They did nothing but insult men but especially their clientele. Tomek says they have contempt for beta males. He's right. He just forgot to mention that they have contempt for everyone else too.
/r/MensRights01/08/09 01:53 AM
0

I love how your first sentence and your last sentence completely contradict one another. Do YOU go to strip clubs?
/r/MensRights01/08/09 01:49 AM
2

Actually, YOU'RE wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minor_(law) He IS a minor and clearly, he is NOT legally able to consent to sex with her. Or else there would be no charges at all, now would there...
/r/MensRights31/07/09 12:29 AM
1

See the little tab that says "other discussions"? Click on that and answer your own question.
/r/MensRights30/07/09 08:31 PM
2

The points you make are good ones but are still irrelevant. The problem is the tone here. I want women who commit sexual crimes against minors to be punished equally. And their level of attractiveness shouldn't factor into it at all. Did he consent? I'm sure he did. But he didn't have the RIGHT to consent. And if this woman gets pregnant, she owns him. Conceptredux's original point is correct. The woman's appearance has NOTHING to do with what was done here
/r/MensRights30/07/09 08:29 PM
3

How old is your brother?
/r/MensRights27/07/09 08:00 AM
10

I started to get cynical when they would shame me for making the tiniest sexist remark… but would soon afterwards laugh at a cut-off penis joke. Boy, that sounds familiar... I wonder what the bulls over at /lolequality would have to say about that one.
/r/MensRights27/07/09 07:59 AM
3

On the one hand, his claim IS shocking and I've never heard of any such thing. On the other hand, it is so central to his story that I think the burden is on YOU to provide a citation proving him wrong. There are things you hear all the time that are so crazy, they have to be true.
/r/MensRights27/07/09 07:31 AM
3

New sockpuppet, Hangly?
/r/MensRights26/07/09 09:37 PM
7

I have been in this career for many years and I have seen, and this is a generalization, that women are better list-makers. They will do their to-do list. They will prioritize their to-do list. They will get through their to-do list. Maybe it’s because we do shopping lists. And if we have a problem — again, as a generalization — we will confront the problem and deal with it head-on. Funny she mentions women's shopping lists. Because the women I've gone shopping with will spend an hour in a groce…
/r/MensRights26/07/09 02:53 AM
1

If you get your husband to sign a waiver and he does so, then he owes you obedience to those terms. I just hope you live up to those terms yourself. Hypocrisy is the worst of human sins.
/r/MensRights26/07/09 02:35 AM
1

I see what you're saying but I think there is an implicit agreement built into all relationships that twenty years from now, you might have gained 20 pounds. But you wont have gained 100. And I think that is a reasonable expectation for men or women.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 10:34 PM
6

Euthanized the dog and took the cats to the shelter too. Reminds me of the pharaohs, who dying would take everyone with them that they wanted to accompany them into the afterlife. The ultimate psychopath, self-absorbed 'til the end. It must have terrified her that her pawn was getting older and wiser.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 12:16 PM
2

That is fucking awesome! That concept was very central to a Newsweek article I bought over a decade ago. I will look for it and quote the relevant parts.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 07:31 AM
2

While I appreciate the anecdote, I still believe it's the exception, not the rule. And I would be skeptical of any woman who cut her hair short shortly after sealing the deal. But, you do raise an interesting angle by reminding me that there are exceptions at all. My username's genesis requires a very long story that you don't want to hear. It was long ago and spread from an incident and a few people to a life philosophy. Some people forgive and forget. I don't.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 07:27 AM
3

Great comment. From personal observation it usually seems to me that people who are together are around the same level of attractiveness, at the very least when they first get together. He's a 7, she's a 7, he's a 2 she's a 3, he's a 10, she's a 10. I am constantly rating both men and women on physical attractiveness on a 1-10. A great place to do that is "Maury", home of the dysfunctional relationship. One interesting thing I've noticed is that with these couples in trouble, overwhelmingly one …
/r/MensRights25/07/09 07:08 AM
1

And that's fine. You're happy, he's happy. But IMHO very few women can pull short hair off and even the ones who can would look better with long hair. I know a lot of men agree with me.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 05:36 AM
2

If fww stands for "fat WHITE women", I never said that. And I'll admit I was talking about black guys (although I never said that either, I just implied it). Many black guys, who are themselves either skinny or fit, date women of ANY ethnicity who are fat. Now how often do you see a black woman with a hot body dating some fat slob (again, of any ethnicity)? I'd say you could take black guys out of this equation and it would STILL be true. Fat men have more trouble with the opposite sex than fat …
/r/MensRights25/07/09 05:32 AM
1

We're not talking about a woman being asked to change. We're talking about a woman being asked to stay the same. When we got together, you were making an effort to be sexy and attractive. If that effort fades away, then you have sold me a false bill of goods. That's the difference between men and women. When a man meets a woman, he hopes she'll stay the same. When a woman meets a man, she immediately begins thinking how she can change him. Now, which of those two scenarios is dramatically less r…
/r/MensRights25/07/09 05:27 AM
3

I'm a fat guy who used to be a hunk. And I agree with you.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 01:20 AM
2

It's more than an issue of "you got fat…lose it or you lose me." Take the initiative and hit the gym yourself. Start eating right yourself. Offer to cook a healthy dinner for her so it'll be easier for her to eat good food. Make getting healthy something you do together for yourselves and for each other, rather than something she's just supposed to do on her own if she doesn't want to wind up on the street. I'm not super fond of this entire sentiment. It kind of comes across that you're blaming …
/r/MensRights25/07/09 01:20 AM
3

I think women have as much right to romance as a man does so... Should women leave men when they stop giving flowers? If it's that important to them and after two or three warnings... YES! How about when they gain a few pounds in places that become unattractive? I think if a couple get fat together or if they've discussed it and it doesn't bother them, have fun. Live happy. But if EITHER member of a relationship gains a significant amount of weight, and then ignores warning signs from the dissat…
/r/MensRights25/07/09 01:14 AM
2

I appreciate this submission. It's good to know at least one person shares my philosophy on this. I'm adding you to my friends, AltTab. I upvote every single thing my friends say or submit that I see. Also added Celticson today. I habitually upvote because we need to counteract the downvoting en masse that we are subjected to by several of the feminists here.
/r/MensRights25/07/09 01:05 AM
2

I like your solution better.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 09:57 PM
3

Fine. You're old enough to type now. Is your mother's hair waist length again?
/r/MensRights24/07/09 08:54 PM
2

You were married for thirty years. Having never seen a picture of you or of her, my money is on you being able to upgrade, not her. Good luck, Celtic, if that's even what you want. My dad is 64 and was married four times. Since his last marriage ended, he finally wised up and casually dated a while and then just stopped caring about women at all.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 08:14 PM
2

I'm hoping Ben countersues her. I don't know if it would be wiser to do that after this trial is over but she can't be legally punished as she failed to utilize the legal system. So financially punish her. I love Ben. He's a hero of mine. But I'm disappointed in him that he consensually banged this woman who looks like Mrs. Ed.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 07:19 PM
20

From the comments - Fat men seem to be able to get "hot" women, but fat women are almost never with attractive men This is such a pervasive myth. It might have been true thirty years ago. Take a walk through a crowd and open your eyes. You will inevitably see a couple where one partner or the other is fat and the other isn't. The fat one will almost always be the woman. When you see a fat guy with a hot chick (and you may have to look all day), look at his watch. $5,000+ ? Mystery solved. Let me…
/r/MensRights24/07/09 07:11 PM
19

When a woman goes from 120 to 140, she does get curvier and that can be an improvement, depending on the woman. When she goes from 120 to 240, she didn't get curvier, she became spherical. And I don't know how well that flies in the Lesbian community but to 99% of men, that is a loss of attractiveness.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 07:03 PM
14

How many women do you see with long hair who, within a year or two of getting married or having a kid, chop their hair off? Women know most men (myself included) find long hair attractive. But in their mind, they've got a man trapped. They don't need to be attractive anymore. Weight. Hair. Makeup. Clothes. These are just symptoms. The disease is a woman thinking she doesn't have to be sexy anymore. I believe the only cure for that disease is leaving her and finding other women.
/r/MensRights24/07/09 07:00 PM
6

She later explained why only the father was convicted, saying "there needs to be some accountability." Think about the logical fallacy inherent in this line of thinking. The crime was severe enough that someone had to be punished but not severe enough that everyone associated with it, bearing equal responsibility for it and equal guilt, had to be. So, if we assume that's correct, then we have to decide who to punish. The male or the female. Who should we deprive of up to one year of their life? …
/r/MensRights24/07/09 04:25 AM
0

Right. So we can expect you and your hardcore, ultra-Liberal ilk in the feminist movement to start protesting immediately in support of these two men? Yeah, I didn't think so. Slowly, men are waking up and seeing who the real extremists are when it comes to gender issues and men's rights.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 08:37 PM
4

You have utterly failed to address anything she said or refute any of her easily-verifiable claims. I doubt you even read the article.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 08:35 PM
2

Well, we would pay these men more but we want women to be paid the same for secretarial work while they take six months off every two years to shit out another kid.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 08:32 PM
2

You know... that's a very interesting point. And that would probably do away with ALMOST all false rape accusations. But I'd still want supersonic justice for the occasional liar who slipped through the cracks.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 06:50 AM
1

I would call that pro-truth, not pro-man.
/r/MensRights23/07/09 05:02 AM
1

it's unclear if McNulty ever tried to file a criminal complaint before taking legal action against him. You know why I'm 99% sure she didn't. Because even if she went to police and they told her no how no way, in this day and age, with this level of media exposure, we would have heard about it. I was right. She never even tried to have him criminally prosecuted. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/07/22/roethlisberger.allegations.ap/index.html?eref=sircrc
/r/MensRights22/07/09 10:05 PM
1

My fandom goes back to '89 or '90. But I believe you're right. He certainly had trouble holding off Joe Gilliam early in his career, didn't get along with Chuck Noll, and made derrogatory comments about the city and the team after he retired. As a side note, I think he is one of the most overrated players in NFL history and easily the most overrated Steeler. NFL Total Access ranked the top ten Steelers of all time yesterday and he was high up there (#3 IIRC). In my opinion, he doesn't belong on …
/r/MensRights22/07/09 08:25 PM
9

I have wrestled with the argument put forth by other people that the false rape accuser should be punished based on what actually happened to the man. In other words, the argument that this woman should be let off lightly whereas if the man had done twenty years in prison, her punishment should be more harsh. In my opinion, this argument is wrong. Once the machinations of the justice system are put in motion by a false accuser, they really have no idea how much damage they might be doing to thei…
/r/MensRights22/07/09 07:55 PM
1

I've always defended my racism by saying that I may believe in a lot of generalizations but I'm also willing to accept that they aren't universal and give individuals the benefit of the doubt. And I like watermelon and fried chicken myself!
/r/MensRights22/07/09 04:27 AM
0

When you're done, read it again.
/r/MensRights22/07/09 03:41 AM
2

Andrea McNulty, as Pierce states at the end. She is a concierge at Harrahs Reno. And Ben admits to consensual sex with her, which makes me think less of Ben since she looks like wolfbait.
/r/MensRights22/07/09 03:39 AM
1

They were too hard on Kordell Stewart, they didn't appreciate Neil O'Donnell until he was a Jet, and they didn't appreciate Bubby Brister. They're spoiled. I am a huge lifelong Steelers fan and other Steelers fans make me sick sometimes. But, you're right. Roethlisberger IS as revered as anyone not named Bradshaw could be.
/r/MensRights22/07/09 03:35 AM
0

I am biased towards Ohkine. I despise all five mods of "equality". There used to be six. I hope whoever the sixth was died of rectal cancer. Therefore, I remove myself from this debate. Gareth, what is this "high ground" you speak of?
/r/MensRights22/07/09 03:32 AM
1

The root disingenuity of Ohkine's comment is that he/she is trying to dissect why males are getting crucified by the educational system. Back when women were getting the short end of the stick, they didn't care why. They just wanted a kneejerk remedy. Don't expect MRAs to care why now either. Feminists love to use statistics to discern where they're getting shafted. Well, we can use them too. I say fire female teachers and hire males teachers until they're employed in equal or nearly equal numbe…
/r/MensRights22/07/09 01:31 AM
9

I think Jodi Kasten is awesome but one blog doesn't put you at the forefront of the men's rights movement. To me, the preeminent authority is Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 10:28 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 08:55 PM
3

Sadly, I think a lot of black males, if asked whether their gender or their race is more of a factor in their unjust treatment in society, would answer race. And from the perspective of an occasionally slightly racist white guy, I have to vehemently disagree. I think the MR movement can be a catalyst for improved race relations because as far as I'm concerned, all American men are in this together. Here's a tangent for you. Can American men do anything for Canadian, British, Australian, New Zeal…
/r/MensRights21/07/09 05:36 PM
2

Fantastic article, Pierce. One quibble about your comment though. I think Ben will recover, just as Bettis recovered -- Bettis became a revered figure in Pittsburgh after that. But note, those are exceptions. Most men do not recover. Bettis was ALREADY a revered figure in Pittsburgh well before those allegations.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 04:41 PM
2

I am a hardcore Steelers fan. A few years ago, some woman accused Bettis of this. I knew the second I heard the accusation that it was false. The same way I know this is false. I know it sounds empty and hollow but the Steelers collect quality young men. Ben has never been in any trouble whatsoever in Pittsburgh. A lot of people who are too stupid to understand that a 24 year old millionaire athlete might feel a little too invincible to wear a motorcycle helmet, blame his motorcycle crash on him…
/r/MensRights21/07/09 04:38 PM
0

If your implausible story is to be believed (and I'll give you the benefit of the doubt), so what? What good did your personal triumph do for other men facing the same situation? One man "moaning" about the system wont change the system. You're right there. But one man bringing his situation to light and sharing with other men (and even sympathetic women) might start a groundswelling of sympathy for fathers' causes in this country that we need. Your advice is completely unconstructive and your m…
/r/MensRights21/07/09 03:59 AM
1

Well I'll leave you with this then. The guy in Gareth321's example who was falsely jailed for eight years... his is the only opinion that matters to me on rehabilitation vs retribution. Not mine and not yours. Ask the guy who was affected.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 03:47 AM
2

Would you care to tell us what you think should happen to a real rapist? What sentence should he receive? I'm also curious what should happen to a kidnapper, someone who deprives another person of their liberty? Let's say just for argument's sake, that I kidnap someone eight months. I'm going to hold them in a place with a bunch of convicts and maybe allow this person I've kidnapped to be sodomized. I'm also going to spread vicious rumors about this person and damage his reputation. So punish me…
/r/MensRights21/07/09 03:29 AM
0

Fighting is fighting. Whining is whining. Um. No. According to you, we here at MensRights are whining, NOT fighting. And understand this, I don't give a fuck about what you think one way or the other. I think you're an ignorant troll and whenever you decide to lurk here, I'm going to point that fact out to everyone else. That way, you wont get the benefit of the doubt to someone who just sees you as another anonymous username. I wonder how old you are to constantly have to cloak everything in a …
/r/MensRights21/07/09 03:25 AM
0

Well... or we could fight the good fight here and get laws changed. But of course that makes us whiners to you.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 02:59 AM
0

Lyrics Every 45 seconds a woman is raped Our sexist culture allows no escape The is violent crime is far from obscurity When the rate of victims is one in three Society conditions men to be rapists And our indifference perpetuates it With derogatory language that tends to dehumanize Making it easier for men to victimize And the pornographic images that help portray Women as legitimate sexual prey When sexism is embedded in our judicial system It's no surprise why the courts won't listen And the …
/r/MensRights21/07/09 01:28 AM
1

When you make a submission with no text explaining that I'm not saying its intelligent or illuminating as I'm not trying to convert anyone because I don't agree with the song. the appearance can be construed as if you are implicitly condoning the material. I completely agree that a mutual admiration society isn't very constructive.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 01:26 AM
-1

There's clearly a female "singing". Or a ten year old boy. And are you trying to imply that only women can be misandrist? Welcome to Reddit. Stick around. You will soon be disavowed of that notion. It isn't intelligent or illuminating enough to pay any attention to. And besides I listened to it once all the way through to see if it was a parody or something. I didn't think any lyricist could be that misinformed. I was wrong. By the way, here is a link to a song by a band called Hatebreed. http:/…
/r/MensRights21/07/09 01:14 AM
0

Wow, even without the ignorant lyrics filled with feminist lies, this song is FUCKING ... TERRIBLE! Please listen to some real metal and never submit misandry to this subreddit again.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 01:04 AM
2

I'm not a fan of that site name. And that Toby Keith song is HORRIBLE. Sadly, I can't think of any other song that could be a male rallying cry. So, maybe it's the temporary winner by default.
/r/MensRights21/07/09 01:00 AM
1

If you mean take a crowbar to their spinal column, OK. I would want to accomplish two goals. First, make sure that individual never attempted to harm my child again. Second, send a clear message to everyone else that fucking with BSC's kids is a bad, BAD idea.
/r/MensRights20/07/09 09:36 PM
6

You realize the guy did eight months for NOTHING. She shouldn't be punished for perjury. She should be punished for kidnapping because that's what she did. When she gets out in TWENTY years, I would then allow the man to sue her for defamation.
/r/MensRights20/07/09 09:34 PM
1

Submitted by jeanne2626 to politics and AnnArchist to "equality". You can comment here if you like but the battle is raging here... http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/92ts0/ohio_law_would_give_men_final_decision_in_abortion/
/r/MensRights20/07/09 09:31 PM
1

I just watched "Ordinary People" (1980) for the first time the other day. Phenomenal film and Donald Sutherland plays one of the best dads and role models you'll ever see.
/r/MensRights20/07/09 06:50 PM
5

Perhaps, in your infinite wisdom, you can provide the OP with some advice then. Perhaps dig deep into your reservoir of testosterone to provide advice that we girly men are lacking. Or you could shut the fuck up. Your call.
/r/MensRights20/07/09 08:00 AM
1

If Wikipedia is to be trusted, only four states may decide your married without your consent. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/92efm/ad_for_women_divorce_secrets_why_you_should_never/
/r/MensRights20/07/09 05:21 AM
4

He's a worthless fucking troll. He's never contributed to any conversation here or otherwise.
/r/MensRights20/07/09 04:52 AM
4

Talking out my ass here, Cresur, but IIRC, you are correct. IQ scores are rising. But not because we're getting smarter. It's because we're learning to test better. I don't know exactly how that works but I remember that seemed to be the conclusion of the experts discussing IQs' steady ascent.
/r/MensRights19/07/09 06:44 PM
6

But why get married at all?
/r/MensRights18/07/09 11:58 PM
2

I would never get married. But it would be good to know for my friends and family.
/r/MensRights18/07/09 10:04 PM
4

I'm very tempted to buy that. It's $19. Good to read the enemies' playbook, no?
/r/MensRights18/07/09 08:01 PM
1

You know what's funny is that when I complain repeatedly that they wont debate me, I'm told that it's my aggressive style and my rhetoric. Noone wants to feed a troll like me. But then why wont they debate you, Pierce? Or Cresur, Kuonji, kanuk876, AnnArchist, Gareth321? Feminist cowards, what are you so afraid of? Are your talking points that flimsy? Your confidence in your position that weak?
/r/MensRights17/07/09 08:18 PM
17

They should give this poor woman a medal after all she's been through. Maybe throw the guy in jail for ruining her cutlery.
/r/MensRights17/07/09 05:23 PM
14

But he was (kind of) cheating on her. Once you've hurt a woman's feelings, she's entitled to do anything she wants.
/r/MensRights17/07/09 05:18 PM
6

If you assume that Lesbians make up roughly 2% of the population (50% X 4%), then the odds of randomly choosing three people and having all 3 be Lesbians should be roughly 1 in 125,000. That's not quite the same as picking three white males. Does that necessarily mean that the professor is promoting a political agenda? No. But is it a troubling sign of what can possibly be expected? Absolutely. Where is the male perspective? Gay or straight? Where is the straight female experience? Perhaps the c…
/r/MensRights17/07/09 05:12 PM
3

The name of the class is "Thinking About Gender". And then the books go 3 for 3 written by Lesbians. So we're going to think about gender, or at least the female gender and how it views the obsolete patriarchy. Am I pre-judging this class and perhaps being way too harsh? Yes. That's what the OP asked me to do. He's the one who has to take or not take this class based on very little information. And as I've already stated gambling his money, his time, and his GPA on that sparse info. We don't hav…
/r/MensRights17/07/09 02:31 PM
1

I dated a woman who had four kids by three different losers. She and her kids were living well below the poverty line but she refused to go after any of the men for any money. Something about her pride. Meanwhile, her kids suffered. If you're too stupid to utilize the resources society provides for you to have a better life, you'll get no sympathy from me. Your kids might. And I look at abortion as a hypothetical problem for women. How dare they even compare that to the problems we face, which a…
/r/MensRights17/07/09 02:10 PM
1

I have to disagree with both of your examples, Ann. I have said several times and I will say again... feminist have NO legitimate complaints. Deadbeat dads? It is illegal and it is the only kind of debt other than tax debt that you can be jailed for. What more can society do to get men to pay child support? We already throw men in jail for not paying child support for a kid that isn't even theirs. If society is doing everything (and more) than can realistically be done, then what do women have t…
/r/MensRights17/07/09 05:11 AM
3

Just wait until the percentage becomes 65% female and men start complaining. Then these women will backtrack and say quotas are wrong. Witness the hypocrisy of the feminist movement pertaining to female attendance in colleges and universities.
/r/MensRights17/07/09 04:59 AM
7

Well, let's see. What could give us a glimpse into this class about gender in today's academic environment taught by a woman? The three required texts... Kate Bornstein, My Gender Workbook (Routledge, 1998) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Bornstein Former male, former transvestite, former Scientologist, Lesbian. Jackie Kay, Trumpet (Vintage, 2000) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Kay Lesbian. I'd link to the wiki for "Trumpet" but the whole thing is nothing but a piece of promotion for the …
/r/MensRights17/07/09 04:40 AM
7

I found a state-by-state comparison of what constituted paternity about five years ago. There were at least a couple states where if you signed the birth certificate, you WERE the father and no DNA test could ever get you off the financial hook. There were other states where you had x amount of days to contest paternity if the mother put you down as the father, even if you weren't there. If the 90 days or 180 days went by and you hadn't contested, you WERE the father, again, with no way to conte…
/r/MensRights16/07/09 04:42 AM
-2

I assume Canada has conscription? But I believe the only country in the world that drafts women is Israel. I could easily be wrong on both counts. Oh, and just like gunners on bomber crews in WWII should have all been women, I'd think sub crews should be female too. Anywhere there is a dearth of space. Maybe tank crews too.
/r/MensRights15/07/09 05:13 AM
1

Aerik told me a story once. In the story, he/she was entertaining male company. This male applied verbal pressure to have sex. There was no force, no coercion, no alcohol or drugs. Just pleading, begging, incessant asking, whatever. So Aerik is either female or gay. The way the story was told, I got a very strong female vibe. I wouldn't bet $1000 that Aerik is female but I WOULD bet $100. Oh by the way, the best part of the story? In Aerik's view, that guy was a rapist. Because she didn't consen…
/r/MensRights15/07/09 05:10 AM
4

Sorry. That was a poorly written sentence. I meant that she is a misandrist... and entirely seperately an idealist. While I agree that the implementation of our armed forces IS misandrist, both with the concept of conscription and females restricted from most combat duty, I also firmly believe that to not have a strong military is an invitation to disaster. I don't think we should be in Iraq (although I did in 2003) but we should have a very strong military. That doesn't mean we have to use it o…
/r/MensRights15/07/09 05:04 AM
7

Note that she repeatedly says don't hit women and then once in a great while clarifies that she is opposed to ALL violence. I would think if she really thought hitting men was as bad as hitting women then she would repeatedly say "Don't hit anyone". I sympathize with her in a way because she spent too much time in a battered women's shelter (was that one of many where battered men aren't allowed to go?) and it has warped her perceptions of the male/female dynamic. But anecdotal evidence seems to…
/r/MensRights15/07/09 12:49 AM
5

No fucking way. That person actually knows how to spell. Aerik flies into such a rage so quickly when anyone dares speak ill of the Sanctified Vagina that Aerik's sockpuppets would all be as trollish as SHE is.
/r/MensRights15/07/09 12:42 AM
2

Actually, Tomek, unless you live in one of those four states, you CAN'T be dragged into a common-law marriage. The other states require consent or don't even have common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights14/07/09 01:39 PM
2

Gender stereotypes aren't politically correct, but can only be published when they benefit women. A thousand upvotes to you, good sir!
/r/MensRights13/07/09 11:03 PM
0

End of second paragraph. Adding to this debate is the fact that the laid-off victims of this recession are overwhelmingly men. How does that add to the debate and for that matter, how is that pertinent at all?
/r/MensRights13/07/09 11:02 PM
5

Here's my question. Clearly, there isn't a single reason for a man to get married. But, depending on the state, what does a man have to do to avoid being married commonlaw? If you cohabitate, can you just kick her out for a month every three years? I haven't given up hope that I'll meet one of the 5% of women who are worth a steady long-term relationship. But I don't want to fall backwards into a marriage without knowing it. Edit - Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage The essent…
/r/MensRights13/07/09 10:15 PM
0

You're at +6. But how many of them caught the Mercyful Fate reference?
/r/MensRights13/07/09 09:03 AM
0

It's my fault. I've made a few enemies here at Reddit and they get bored from time to time. Thanks for your moral support though, DuBBle.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 08:30 AM
0

I totally agree. Without knowing anything else about it, I probably wont see it because Katherine Heigl is in it. She added to the controversy over "Knocked Up" and whether it's sexist or not. I find it offensive that anyone would label a film as misogynistic, when the film's main female character is shown as much more mature and basically likeable. Are we allowed to portray women as anything but completely positive figures in mass media? I would love to hear anyone defend the viewpoint that "Kn…
/r/MensRights13/07/09 04:12 AM
1

Oh, no problem. It got a lot of traffic other places. It may have run out of steam. You and I were the fifth and sixth people to post it I believe.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 03:57 AM
1

High class escorts is a misnomer. They are just expensive whores. There is no class involved.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 02:41 AM
1

I agree totally. And while I don't have any children, if I did and anyone, male or female did anything to harm my child, I would attempt to beat them to death.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 02:31 AM
1

Ether, you redirected to it because you're polite. I just stole it.
/r/MensRights13/07/09 02:28 AM
3

Dude, those are great statistics and I really appreciate you posting them but... From WHAT wiki?
/r/MensRights12/07/09 08:01 PM
3

Originally submitted by cardboardtubesamurai to politics.
/r/MensRights12/07/09 07:54 PM
3

Shady8x and Celticson should have merged their comments. The cat and the dude are both better off without her. Of course, I would have kicked her ass out.
/r/MensRights12/07/09 02:32 AM
3

From the comments. The industry stats definitely tell part of the story. But could it be that the advantage men have enjoyed regarding pay differentials is coming back to haunt them now? Women have been making around $0.78 to every dollar men make, holding experience and actual job constant. In a recession, where cost-cutting is at a premium, it makes good economic sense for companies to cut the higher cost, equal-performing employee. So given the historic and ongoing pay differential between wo…
/r/MensRights11/07/09 05:44 AM
8

This is an excellent point. I think you may be right about the solution to that. Maybe if the false rape is discovered by any means but by her own recantation, give her twenty years. If she recants, let her off completely. I don't know what else to do. I want the guilty punished but I want the innocent released even more.
/r/MensRights11/07/09 12:20 AM
3

Just a little advice based on past experience... Don't hold your breath.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 11:33 PM
2

I agree with everything you said. Except the OP doesn't owe us anything as far as a movement, especially as a woman. Her post may not have pushed us forward an inch in the gender wars but it may have made her day a lot better. I think that's good enough.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 08:43 PM
1

Good question. Unfortunately, jabb0's submission is by far the best article I found on this case.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 08:18 PM
2

Speaking only for myself, I welcome both this submission and any further future submissions you want to make, Monica.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 08:15 PM
7

False rape accusation + extortion + prostitution = 127 days... wow... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion In the United States, extortion may also be committed as a federal crime across a computer system, phone, by mail or in using any instrument of "interstate commerce." Extortion requires that the individual sent the message "willingly" and "knowingly" as elements of the crime. The message only has to be sent (but does not have to reach the intended recipient) to commit the crime of extorti…
/r/MensRights10/07/09 08:03 PM
2

I see what you're saying but I think your undervalueing anger as a motivating force. When people have been impacted negatively by the way this country's misandrist laws are implemented, they might get angry but in an impotent helpless way. When they see and hear other people feel the same way, that anger can become something more powerful. I'd also like to point out how few submissions we get from a female point of view. For a guy like me who is a self-described misogynist, it is important to se…
/r/MensRights10/07/09 07:54 PM
1

He better come into some money. He also posted on his MySpace that he didn't want kids, the kid was born seven months ago, and his mom was busted ofr six felonies. I don't think he has a shot and if I was a judge, I probably wouldn't award him custody, knowing the very scant facts that I know. The guy I want is that Jon & Kate guy. I don't watch the show but I've heard the show makes him look very sympathetic and his wife not so much. I've heard that from men and women.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 07:38 PM
2

Johnston, Ann. With a T. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi_Johnston
/r/MensRights10/07/09 07:32 PM
1

There's nothing of value in your reply.
/r/MensRights10/07/09 06:04 PM
11

We need a centralized, single organization to counteract NOW and other similar organizations for women. We need to enter the public awareness. The people who would be hostile to us, would be anyway. I think there are millions of men out there who feel the same way we do and don't know we're here. There are millions more who are on a figurative fence and just need to be exposed to some of this information. We need to become a political force, with lobbying and a media presence. What would an orga…
/r/MensRights10/07/09 05:31 PM
1

That doesn't make them common. That doesn't mean you can interject them into a conversation with just anyone. When you do, it looks like you're trying to be a know-it-all. A Google search of those two terms proved I was right. And by the way, QED? You probably mean quod erat demonstrandum, according to Google. But I can't be sure. I don't believe I've ever seen QED until I came to Reddit, where I've seen it once or twice. If you used QED, I think you would come off as pretentious as well if you …
/r/MensRights10/07/09 05:08 PM
-2

Ohhhh! There you go again! VMS! Wowweee! I just learn and learn when you share all your smarts by posting!
/r/MensRights09/07/09 10:49 PM
-1

I've noticed every reply you make, you leave out at least one part. Your acronym argument fails. You're being disingenuous to the point of outright lying. And then you dug up those three cases that were just like Fred Lane, other than the fact that they were nothing at all similar. You're a liar, a fool, a troll, a blustering, bluffing buffoon. I can't even believe you resorted to comparing Reddit histories. Most 8 year olds would be embarrassed if they did that. If you knew anything about how R…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 10:47 PM
-4

As far as an illiterate like yourself is concerned, I invented the word misandrist. Boy, I almost feel sorry for you. You must have spent at least five minutes with your precious Google. And for what? To find three cases that are nothing at all like the Fred Lane case. Fred Lane's wife ambushed him, incapacitated him and then executed him. Should I wait two more hours for you to worm your way out Google crushing your acronyms? Dude, you're my inferior. Physically, mentally, any way that matters.…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 10:37 PM
-2

gsr search, without you cheating. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4SUNA_enUS251US251&q=gsr leo search, as badly as your manipulation made you look, this is worse. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4SUNA_enUS251US251&q=LEO And hey, remember this comment? Yeah. The question you couldn't answer even though you tried to bluff your way through it. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8zlzw/steve_mcnairs_girlfriend_shot_and_killed_him/…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:55 PM
1

Why are you here?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:37 PM
-2

Why are you here?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:34 PM
-1

Without question. And since you got destroyed in every debate you've dipped your toes in around here one-on-one, both with me and with other /MRers, you now think you're gonna come over here and gang up on me. But we've already exposed your lack of intellect and your misandrist agenda. Go join your fellow cunts over at /Equality.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:24 PM
-3

We've been swamped with trolls like yourself lately. We figure morons like yourself might respond best to a level of language you're used to.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:20 PM
0

Your misandry shows more and more with every comment. Dumbfuck, you're not the only who can look at a comment history. I didn't have to look far to see what kind of braggart, lying sack of shit troll you are. You don't know anything about me personally and you're about as far from the truth as you could be. Meanwhile, it's clear you want everyone to think you're the chief of the NYPD when actually you just watched some reruns of "Hill Street Blues" to get your obscure acronyms. Yes, I've noticed…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:19 PM
2

I haven't read it yet but any story about rape probably belongs here in my opinion and I had already upvoted you. Then I read AnnArchist's belief that this could be a false claim. Now I wish I could upvote you more than once.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 08:56 PM
-4

Slander law? Get the fuck out of /MR, you misandrist, pretentious pillowbiter.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 08:29 PM
0

I've never seen either of those acronyms. Anywhere. Ever. Nice sockpuppet.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 08:28 PM
-4

Premeditated execution? Care to cite ONE example, misandrist?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 08:27 PM
-3

What you've offered up isn't circumstantial evidence. It's unsubstantiated rumor and not only that, it's rumor that was spouted by a deranged killer. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about and are digging yourself deeper and deeper. Troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 06:12 PM
-1

Those aren't common acronyms, you pretentious windbag.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 06:07 PM
-1

Wow! Good job, Columbo! Well, I had recently seen signs that his wife was a golddigging whore. Shall we call it a tie?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 06:02 PM
-3

Any evidence he was cheating with more than one woman?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 05:51 PM
3

The worst thing this poor guy should have been worried about was taking a bath in divorce court.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 05:45 PM
-6

When this case first broke, I read multiple times that he had been shot five times. Once in the head and three in the chest from a distance and a contact shot with powder burn to finish him off. This is at least the second time I've read four times though and those were more recent. Oh and I know you're trying to make yourself sound smart. But using acronyms assumes your audience knows what you're talking about. If they don't, it just makes you sound pretentious. LEO? GSR?
/r/MensRights09/07/09 05:19 PM
-1

Yeah. Happens to men all the time. Shoot a guy once to incapacitate him and then finish him off execution style.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 05:14 PM
-4

Or when you realize you married a golddigging whore.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 05:13 PM
3

Surely, you don't want to get into a battle over criminal punishment by gender in the US... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler
/r/MensRights09/07/09 02:00 PM
7

Well imagine you're a decent looking but not GQ model professional athlete. Everywhere you go, women throw themselves at you. Wouldn't you ask yourself "Why"? And once you've realized these women are attracted to the money and fame, especially the money, what loyalty do you really still owe them? This is the second NFL player in recent memory to be murdered by a woman. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Lane_(American_football) On July 6, 2000, he was shot and killed by his wife Deidra during an …
/r/MensRights09/07/09 01:25 PM
12

Maybe I'm being overly sensitive here. But McNair is shot five times, three in the chest, two in the head. Only the final headshot is at close range. The woman is shot once, point blank to the head. The gun is found underneath her where she slumped over. The gun is a weapon she had purchased two days before. The doors are locked and there's no sign of forced entry. Yet how long did it take them to declare this a murder-suicide? Four days? They wanted to wait until they had a motive. Now change t…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 11:07 AM
-2

You guys are both making good points, so much so that I don't know which of you I agree with. For that reason, I hope you guys aren't downvoting one another. Because I'd bet $20, you're BOTH getting downvoted by some of our lurker friends.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 10:17 AM
0

You guys are both making good points, so much so that I don't know which of you I agree with. For that reason, I hope you guys aren't downvoting one another. Because I'd bet $20, you're BOTH getting downvoted by some of our lurker friends.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 10:17 AM
0

That class act you're complimenting banned me at a user's request from /Equality, where I am still banned. She admitted to me, many times both publicly and privately that the banning was unjust. So did her fellow "moderator, Xzxzzx. So why am I STILL banned? Because neither of them was willing to deal with the perceived flak from their hardcore feminist membership. ANd by the way, the mod who banned Saydrah is no longer here. The mod who UNbanned her is kanuk876. So does /MR really deserve a "bl…
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:41 AM
1

I know nothing about pro basketball then don't make conjectures about how it works. You started with the ignorant conjectures. Do you know who Cheryl Miller is? I know nothing about pro basketball and you seem to know less. (You, three days ago)honestly, i don't think people are equal. and i don't think that everyone can do the same things or the same jobs. i just think that everyone should have the same opportunities. (You, four hours ago)again, you're not reading what i'm writing. there isn't …
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:36 AM
-1

Because people like you are too stupid to see that I was addressing the OP of the video.
/r/MensRights09/07/09 09:28 AM
8

Originally posted by dracovich at offbeat. I politely asked him to repost it here and was downvoted to -6. I guess the moral of the story is just hijack the submission next time.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 11:18 PM
3

I agree. This was idiotic to do in this climate. But I bet he's an awesome teacher.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:26 PM
1

Professionally, well. Personally, not so well. But that's life. Priorities.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:05 PM
1

Serume, I live in Las Vegas, probably the most superficial city in the world. And YOUR English is excellent. I don't know if monolingual is a word but I believe it's probably acceptable. You knew what I meant so I guess mission accomplished.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 09:57 PM
1

I love the rain. I've lived in the desert for too long. Why isn't Stockholm a good place? Oh and as a stupid, loud American, will it hurt me that I am completely monolingual?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 09:41 PM
1

I'm typing this from my flight to Sweden!
/r/MensRights08/07/09 09:33 PM
2

Good point. It might be a good idea to constantly be analytical and self-critical to make sure the righteousness isn't lost. And I think a lot of valid comparisons can be made between us and early feminists. So, there is no guarantee that we wont walk the same dark side they did as their movement progressed (regressed).
/r/MensRights08/07/09 09:20 PM
1

I'm 35, single, good looking but fat. Should I lose the weight before I move?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 09:18 PM
2

I can't in good conscience read it then without paying for it, Kuonji. I hope everyone follows my example as $3.95 isn't much and I've heard this is excellent.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 08:16 PM
3

I wont lie and say that across the entire landscape of the men's rights movement, there aren't some old school guys who want to take back what women have gained and revert the gender arena to 1949. But those guys (IF my theory is right and they even exist) are an invisible tiny minority. I've never seen any leaders of the MR movement, here at Reddit or elsewhere, promote any kind of male superiority. This movement is about equality and fairness. And that is why we will eventually win. We are rig…
/r/MensRights08/07/09 08:13 PM
2

I totally agree. And to clarify, I think she SHOULD be charged with murder and so should every single other woman ever charged with murdering thier children. And that is why that law has to go.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 08:05 PM
1

I wont marry someone because of their money. However, I might decline marrying someone because of their lack of money. At first glance, this seems like a contradiction. But I see what you mean. But I would be much more reluctant to be in a relationship with someone who I feel takes advantage of me, and that is how I would feel if I earned a lot more and thereby paid for.. everything. Do you think I, as a male who makes good but not great money, have the right to feel the same way? And by the way…
/r/MensRights08/07/09 07:26 PM
3

Guys, feel free to blast me if I'm wrong for even asking this... But are we "stealing" this by reading it? Is this supposed to be free to read?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 07:16 PM
9

Thanks, I guess. Although I'd say I'm just fighting the fire the linked commenter started with fire.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 05:29 PM
4

I agree with everything Ann said from an exposure standpoint. But never make any kid, boy or girl, do anything they have experienced and then didn't like.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 05:18 PM
2

I'd like to attack it for you but I totally agree with it and I don't have the capability to warp my logic enough to argue the other side.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 05:15 PM
23

Who's going to exterminate us? Can you imagine a literal battle of the sexes? Now can you imagine the women actually winning? The trick would be killing them and then harvesting their eggs while their corpses were fresh.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 05:09 PM
2

I upvoted you there.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:56 PM
1

You get an upvote, if for nothing else than for slipping in the very subtle "Empire Strikes Back" reference.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:53 PM
1

You get an upvote, if for nothing else than for slipping in the very subtle "Empire Strikes Back" reference.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:53 PM
3

So women can't be expected not to trade up if given the opportunity? I just hope you're as forgiving of men with the same mentality.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:50 PM
10

I can't say a bad word about my grandma. I was the apple of her eye. By the time I was 13 or 14, I was a pretty bad kid and bounced between my mother and father. But I spent a year with my grandma and stopped getting in trouble and got much better grades. Because a disappointed look on my grandma's face was worse punishment than corporal punishment, beratings, groundings, loss of TV and video games and being thrown in jail combined. It's an old cliche but I was screaming towards prison or death …
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:36 PM
1

Yes, but it isn't societal sexism when it does happen. It's rare and random and criminal. What more should society do to protect women from it happening?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:27 PM
1

You were too accurate and truthful. They had no choice but to downmod you... But not explain it.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:25 PM
2

Alright, now you're just showing off.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:24 PM
2

Yes, of course. But who pays for the lube and the tequila?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:23 PM
3

To be honest, I don't really remember. It was nonsensical, which is unusual coming from my granny. She was not only extremely smart, she was very well-read. I guess it doesn't matter because there's no way the word "fuck" IS derrogatory to women.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 04:16 PM
4

You can always have a pretty good idea of what a man and woman are doing to and with each other if you're paying attention, but I am convinced that no third party can ever know what they mean to each other. So much goes on in the silences. That is as eloquent as anything I have ever read. I mean that. That is poetry. It takes an unusally perceptive person to know that and an unusually intelligent person to express it. I think you should write for a living.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 11:13 AM
1

I'm opposed to any minimization of female crime, based solely on the fact of gender. So I'm totally opposed to "infanticide" as a seperate crime. That said, I agree with the defnse lawyer that if this isn't infanticide, what is. I think you either have to throw the law away or give her the lesser charge. To charge her with murder while infanticide is on the books is hypocritical.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:53 AM
3

I hate to say it but a 15 year old should be placed in the custody of whichever parent he/she chooses barring extreme circumstances. I also think this dad's timing is bad from two standpoints. First, it does look bad that he did this after the mother's cancer diagnosis. Second, he should have cut and run from a religious cult years before. I know I know, hindsight, etc. I sympathize with this guy but I don't think I would award him custody either.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:42 AM
17

My grandmother, who was the greatest human being I have ever known, was a pretty hardcore feminist. I was about seven or eight and got in trouble at school for saying "fuck". Granny wasn't mad but she explained to me that I could never ever EVER use that word. Because it was derrogatory to women. I asked her why. I didn't really know what fucking was but I kind of had a vague grasp. Her answer made no sense to me as a seven year old but in those days, she was infallible and I assumed as I got ol…
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:31 AM
2

Just to clarify... I normally like skinnier women. But she was so beautiful, she kind of shattered that ceiling for me sexually. BUT... She was also devoid of personality. Most of her personality was buried under pills and what wasn't was negative. I don't think she was a good person.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:24 AM
2

Marriage has been around since the dawn of time too. But it is an outdated institution that has run its course.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:22 AM
1

Asking a legitimate question is not a strawman. He's asking you to clarify. I also don't think male turtles that are more successful mates are so because of better material resources. I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:21 AM
2

Serume didn't say whether they were male or female. And I'm curious myself. I assume, like you did, that Serume is female.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:19 AM
4

You write it. My $19.95 is waiting for you. Hit Vegas on the tour and I'll get you to autograph it.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:17 AM
2

You can't respond to AnnArchist without responding to the article. You are implying that this woman is a feminist. I would say both fair-minded equalist women and ballbusting pseudodykes would both say you're wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:16 AM
1

Why? Are you the male or the female and do you live in the US? And how long have you been dating? Kids?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:14 AM
1

That doesn't seem to be your original point at all. Yup, the only reason. Aside from love, starting a family, and spending your life with someone.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:13 AM
2

Are you a woman, a hopeless romantic or are you from 1952?
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:11 AM
3

Women are as guilty of marrying for looks as men are. The myth that women do not rate men on a criteria based on appearance is 25 years outdated at least. Women rate appearance as highly as men do. The difference is that men largely admit it and women don't. So when trying to minimize female sexism by saying "Well, the men do it too...", make sure you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:10 AM
2

I watched her reality show once. I can safely say she doesn't get the benefit of the doubt a lot of other hot chicks would get.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:06 AM
2

I am the biggest male pig in the world, or at least on Reddit, or at least I try. I say he has to pay for the first date because he asked. If they both enjoy the first date enough, she owes him the second date. In the event of a third date... I don't know...
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:05 AM
1

Right. Whereas the misandry started with the cited article. Or just society in general...
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:03 AM
2

So using your logic, we are not allowed to criticize her but you are allowed to criticize us? For doing the same thing she's doing? You do know it's illegal to pay someone less money based on gender? So, on an individual basis, women are payed the same. Or if they're not, they're stupid. Inside occupations as a whole, men have more experience, more education and take dramatically less time off. They are also more willing to relocate and commute. Now, as an employer, who are you paying more to ke…
/r/MensRights08/07/09 10:01 AM
1

Just ... fucking ... wow ... It's not like her lawyer would have any reason to lie. It's also not like her lawyer may be wrong.
/r/MensRights08/07/09 08:40 AM
1

Why have I heard of Irlandes before? And does anyone know what he means about the man in jail forever for allegedly hidng money? AND I am not a parent but I love kids and would like to have one someday. How would one go about establishing that you were the primary caregiver as a parent? How would you document that for a court?
/r/MensRights07/07/09 05:37 PM
3

Your definition of feminist is not universally accepted. This is a debate we've had here many, many times. There is a perceived bias about the title "feminist", in my opinion and many other people's, a negative one. I would urge women who truly want equal rights and equal responsibilities and want to right the many wrongs being done to men today to call themselves something else. (These women are much rarer than women would have you think by the way)
/r/MensRights07/07/09 05:11 PM
-3

Many men what? Cut their hair? Men are the more visual sex right? Women are above all that and superior to that. So I guess it's worse when women do it. Of course women hit a wall about thirty years earlier than men do no matter how well they keep up their appearances.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 05:06 PM
3

I totally agree. And women need to muster their forces and put a really smart candidate in the national spotlight. I'm 35. I wouldn't be surprised if there are multiple female presidents before I die.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:28 PM
3

You don't know that. I get the sense from Letterman that he's kind of world weary and that noone could make him apologize for something if he didn't want to. The worst they could do is fire him and he could retire, which I almost think he'd like. And what shitstorm? You were one of a hundred people offended by it. Letterman said his writers made a mistake about which of her daughters was at that game. I believe him. Why is Palin above political satire and commentary?
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:26 PM
-1

I think you're wrong but I hope you're right.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:22 PM
3

Letterman apologized for that joke and explained it. Your Obama comparison is irrelevant if you had watched Letterman's apology.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:21 PM
3

And would you extend that to women who voted for McCain, not because of the presence of Palin, but because they wanted to vote against Obama for beating Hilldog in the Dem primary? And smart women don't have to apologize for idiots.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 01:19 PM
2

My comment can't withstand the scrutiny that your eloquent and intelligent rebuttal subjects it to.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 12:54 PM
1

Perjury is when you lie in court, not when you make a false allegation. And the penalty should be more than five years anyway.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 11:20 AM
5

From the blogger... First, what the fuck is up with men calling themselves feminists? I don’t call myself a feminist, because it’s not my call whether I am or not. It’s women’s call. So now in addition to letting women make all the laws and dictate policy, we're also going to let them dictate our own identities to us? From commenters... Perhaps not parading it, but if I asked a man whether he was a feminist, I’d hope to hear a ‘yes’, as opposed to ‘well, I believe men and women should be equal, …
/r/MensRights07/07/09 10:53 AM
8

A registered Democrat who voted Republican for the first time in her life. Just another woman (and there were millions) who decided to hell with things like the issues, moral stands, etc. I'm voting for the woman! OR I'm voting against the guy who unfairly beat my female candidate in the Democratic primary. So what if Palin is the biggest imbecile in national politics in recent memory. She has a vagina!
/r/MensRights07/07/09 10:33 AM
1

Mooshiga commenting on an Aerik submission... I'm sure it's very fair and even-handed.
/r/MensRights07/07/09 10:26 AM
0

Since I've never seen Hangly make a comment that wasn't hostile to men's rights, I have to be a hypocrite and ask a question I normally hate to see asked... What the fuck does this have to do with /MR?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:20 PM
-1

Something like that will certainly have left evidence. So, please prove it.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:16 PM
0

Mooshiga is a misandrist cunt. She is in very good company in /Equality. There was noone over there fighting for men who isn't a regular at /MensRights. All six moderators are misandrists and culpable in the environment they have intentionally created. WBB posts are not allowed. MBB posts are allowed and posted by the moderators themselves. pn6 proved this. Saydrah is LYING when she can't quite think of any male voices that have been silenced over there. The feminists crying over there that /Equ…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:12 PM
-1

Wow. You went through a divorce. And voted! I take back everything I said. You are the preeminent voice in men's rights in this or any other country. Warren Farrell salutes you. but if you want to be the dick and fine the women and not the men Nice. Straw man toppings on my ad hominem milkshake! You fail at reading comprehension. Please. Help men out the best way you can. Shut the fuck up and go away.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 10:52 PM
0

Please spare me your Psych 101 analysis. You have no clue what my motivations are and so you go to a tired cliche that isn't true and would be irrelevant even if it was. You are a frequent poster to /Equality and a misandrist. You and I have traded comments many times. There is a conspiracy against men and you're too fucking stupid to see it. And even scarier than the anti-male propaganda disseminated by hardcore feminists is the subtle, anti-male bias exhibited by dullards like yourself who thi…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 10:34 PM
0

I know who you are. And male or female, you're a misandrist. Having a penis doesn't excuse it. It makes it worse. You have completely failed to answer my questions or even clarify what point you were trying to make. The men were fined. The women weren't. Doublespeak your way around that.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:59 PM
6

I completely agree. I've made this argument before. If we're not going to charge these false accusers with the equivalent of rape themselves, let's slap them with another severe felony equalivalent, kidnapping.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:39 PM
-6

Good point. Your kids are fucked either way. I predict jail, suicide, pregnancy and/or heavy heroin use by age 12. That's NOT what trolling means but rest assured, you are a troll. Now please fuck off. I grow weary of your banality.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:37 PM
-1

What the fuck are YOU doing to help? Other than not answering my questions and excusing female supremacy. Who fucking cares why they're homeless. Clearly, it's harder for men to be homeless in this country... just like a parent, a criminal, a former spouse, a medical patient, etc, etc, ad infinitum. Your victim card has expired.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:35 PM
-1

You don't know me very well. I don't give a fuck what anyone on here thinks of me, about how "right" or "sensitive" I am. A quick perusal of my comment history ought to show you what I mean. You are a liar, a hypocrite, a moron and a troll. I think Greasy needs a lot less therapy than you do, my friend. Please tell me you don't have any sons.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:21 PM
-2

I addressed that part of your argument already. My guess is most of those men are homeless because they're veterans, (many of them Vietnam veterans who were drafted while women got to stay home) or homeless because of alimony/child support payments or perhaps because in this recession, males have lost 80% of the total jobs that have dried up. So, many men are homeless because of women either directly or indirectly. And doing the right thing isn't always easy. Your financial status shouldn't alwa…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:17 PM
1

That's similar to the argument about women not fighting for conscription for themselves. I will never blame anyone for looking after their own interests first. Just don't try and pretend you took the high road later and call yourself an equalist/egalitarian. If you don't have a problem with those issues, then you are a female supremacist, AKA feminist.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:02 PM
4

Welcome to /MR. I see you've never commented here before, at least not in recent memory. You're off to a great start. Your ridiculously hostile tone and then your dishonesty about what you were doing when you DID emasculate a ten year old boy by comparing him to a ten year old girl shows me all I need to see about what kind of person you are. I guess you were never scared of anything unusual when you were a kid. I don't consider calling into question your considerably weak masculinity by calling…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:52 PM
12

I'd like to see sentences MUCH longer than a year but this is a great start. I just wish this was the US.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:26 PM
-3

Good riddance?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:20 PM
1

Dude, are YOU trolling? Calling out and emasculating a ten year old boy? Years later? Which feminist are you sockpuppeting for, you fucking faggot?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:19 PM
1

Oh, calm down. I believe you. I would dissect not "Fight Club" itself, but the date's opinion of it. It is a slightly misogynistic film. I would love to hear a smart woman who appreciated it explain why. I didn't know until years later that Pahluniak is gay. I have to admit that the entire film kind of takes on another level of subtext for me knowing that but it's irrelevant. It's a great film. I once had a woman who I was slightly interested in intellectually and very interested in sexually tel…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 08:01 PM
0

So you're in favor of alimony then?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 11:26 AM
0

I know nothing about pro basketball but I'd be willing to bet that there have been 5 or so female basketball players who could have been a deep reserve on an NBA team. But if I was the NBA, why would I let them in? So every team can be forced to accomodate them with an extra locker room? But the average woman, given the physical regimen men undergo to get in shape could serve in frontline combat capacity. As I have already stated, this isn't the nineteenth century. Noone is going on long infantr…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 10:50 AM
-2

Navy SEAL is an extreme example. Care to name something a little closer to home and a little less elite? I have never heard of a woman making Navy SEAL or Marine Force Recon or Green Beret. I wouldn't doubt it has happened although I'd be willing to bet that it has happened extremely rarely. Or alternatively, care to name ANYTHING men can't do that women can?
/r/MensRights06/07/09 10:03 AM
0

Women aren't oppressed. They have nothing to complain about anymore. They won every single battle they fought. This isn't 1965. Men are oppressed here, today. We don't have to play a victim card that is 50 years old or more or exists entirely in sub-industrialized nations.
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:59 AM
0

One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest is my favorite movie of all time. Fight Club is in my top 30, maybe even my top 20. Anyone who perused my very recent comment history would know both of those things and so I doubt it was coincidental that you picked those two examples. I have never seen Brick or The Notebook. I am extremely familiar with The Notebook though and had only vaguely heard of Brick. I would say that if I dated a woman a night for a year, the odds that I would EVER hear OFOTCN as a favor…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:55 AM
-1

I have personally experienced the one-sided misandry of the moderators and users of /Equality. I am not alone in that observation. Those women were unable to debate here or there and so instead substitute a campaign of mass blanket downvoting. Hypothetically, if I submitted a list of ten or so usernames to kanuk and he banned those users, everyone's scores, especially mine, would mysteriously stop being downvoted. And by the way, these users, almost never comment. Welcome to the sisterhood, by t…
/r/MensRights06/07/09 09:33 AM
1

I find it completely disgusting and totally offensive... but I would never seek to censor it or approve of it being vandalized or stolen.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 10:21 PM
0

•A two-worker household in which the woman makes more money than he does Rare. When it does happen, the woman resents the man and her friends and family think he's a loser. •A family in which the father stays at home with the child(ren) while the mother works See above. •Casual sexual partners/fuckbuddies/whatever you'd like to call them An entirely different dichotomy but I'll cede the point to you. Those women are not whores. By the way, I've had three of them, all ex-girlfriends, and they are…
/r/MensRights05/07/09 07:32 PM
0

Women sell sex for something. Men don't. What that something is that women are bartering for sex changes from woman to woman but is material in nature a lot more often than people realize. What you would call a man who works in a profession he doesn't enjoy is up to you. Whatever that term is, I plead guilty. A promiscuous woman isn't a slut (as long as she's being honest with everyone involved, including herself). A woman who trades the use of her vagina for material items is a disgusting whore…
/r/MensRights05/07/09 06:12 PM
0

WHAT can't men do or women do? And women CAN serve in combat capacities in the military. The reasons for keeping them out of combat range from disingenuous statements with no evidence at best to outright lies at worst. And why should a man have to die to save the life of a woman? And then repeat that millions of times in this country's history. I think a man can do literally everything a woman can do. (Barring obvious joke by morons about childbirth) Including parent.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 02:38 PM
-1

I agree to some extent. I think any man who gets married is a fool. You can't turn a whore into a housewife. And they're almost all whores.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 12:34 PM
-1

That's fine. Just don't turn around and lie and say you're all about equality. If you're promoting a pro-female, anti-male agenda, just be honest.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 10:41 AM
0

Please cite an example. What exactly should remain or become unequal in the eyes (and laws) of society?
/r/MensRights05/07/09 10:21 AM
4

I am really torn on this woman. I think the Supreme Court needs more liberal judges, if for no other reason than balance. But this woman is a piece of shit and is clearly biased against men.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 10:16 AM
1

They think conscripting men is unjust and that conscripting women as well would be even more unjust. I would argue just the opposite. IF it is an injustice, then it is a much less severe injustice when everyone is exposed to it. And by the way, you will never do away with the concept of conscription. You can only hope that it is used sparingly, and for just reasons. I agree with Zoombas. Expose women to combat duty (and I mean ground infantry, not just fighter pilots) in equal numbers and the pr…
/r/MensRights05/07/09 05:45 AM
1

Deadon as usual, Pierce.
/r/MensRights05/07/09 05:36 AM
0

Submitted by jempina to /politics. Sic 'em, boys.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:19 PM
1

The thing is, if you write posistive discimination laws for one gender, then have to write addtitional laws to correct your original over correction then you're just adding more and more weight to the balance, until one day the balance breaks. I agree with you. Where were you forty years ago? Unfortunately, now, men suffer under the burden of unfair laws and policy and perception across the board. So, any sane man would have to ask that we maybe even things up before we apply your idealistic pol…
/r/MensRights04/07/09 04:43 PM
-4

Gutless cunt downmods.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 04:22 PM
-1

Until you can prove that claim, I think we'll have to read the law as written. It IS a sexist law.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 04:20 PM
0

I would tell any feminist that believed that female tennis players provide equal entertainment value and thus deserve equal pay for 60% of the work (a set of 3 vs. a set of 5 is 60% NOT 66%) that she must agree with me that we should do away with Title IX and allow men's athletics to regain the position it deserves. Since people have clearly shown repeatedly across the entire range of collegiate athletics that they would rather watch college football than probably every other sport played by eit…
/r/MensRights04/07/09 04:19 PM
0

What rules specifically do we create to prop up men, especially white men? I have been opposed to affirmative action my whole life. But since it has been used to keep men down and it's now going to be womens' turn soon, I guess we'll just have to live with it. Because women are not going to have more than 51% of college attendance OR graduates if I have anything to say about it.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 01:50 PM
3

In the eyes of the law, I demand equality. I'm not sure what you're talking about when you talk about equality because you left it open-ended. But my vision of equality is the goal. And I'll settle for nothing less.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 09:36 AM
-2

First of all, you object to the headline. How about talking about the article? Second, the feminist movement operated a blitzkrieg for thirty years and essentially won every battle they fought. Please don't expect us to operate at a "higher" level now. It is essential that we win the huge number of battles that lie before us. If we have to fight dirty, I will. If you don't want to, that's fine. I don't begrudge you following your own instincts. But don't begrude others for following a winning fo…
/r/MensRights04/07/09 09:33 AM
1

Actually, why don't we try thirty years of letting men raise children without women around. Since we've tried the reverse for the last thirty years and that generation of women has proven to be the worst generation of parents in history. THEN we'll try it your way. By the way, I didn't downvote you.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 09:27 AM
9

When men complain about something, it's a human problem. Both genders should get attention. When women complain (about whatever laughable "problem" they have), it's because of men, the patriarchy, etc, etc, ad infinitum. We have definable, objective bias showed to us across the spectrum of society and they're crying about the 1800s, the plight of African women and rape. Rape. Their silver bullet. Their default whine when confronted with hard facts, statistics and informed and educated debate. Pl…
/r/MensRights04/07/09 09:22 AM
-5

And to the superdykes blanket downvoting every comment I make, keep it up. I guess the truth really is that scary to some people.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 09:07 AM
-1

All active heterosexuals... yes.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 06:47 AM
-1

All women are prostitutes. It's just a question of terms and negotiation.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:59 AM
-6

I have very little experience in /feminisms. But they DO stoop to this level in /Equality.
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:42 AM
0

I don't care what they've done with every other man. I care about my time. And I'm not wasting it on a woman who wont put out, especially since so many women are lousy in bed and the longer they want to holdout, the more likely they suck (figuratively).
/r/MensRights04/07/09 05:40 AM
-2

Who fucking cares. Their silence here and total inability to debate just makes their intellectual bankruptcy that much more obvious. I take my downvotes as a mark of pride and a badge of honor. I'll be honest. I just auto-upvote everything by anyone I recognize. If Cresur, PierceHarlan, AnnArchist, or kanuk876 post ANYTHING, I upvote it, even if I disagree totally. (Rare but it has happened) I'll just add you to the list, Gareth.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:43 PM
1

I didn't think it would really work... until I did it. It's amazing. I think a lot of it was psychosomatic. You have more confidence because you have a system. But that couldn't have been the entire reason for my night and day success rate.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:37 PM
-1

Pussy by the fourth date. No exceptions ever for any reason. If she hasn't put out by then, she isn't worth your time. Ask her what her favorite movie is. If it's "Pretty Woman", end the date immediately and never see her again. If it's "Fried Green Tomatoes" or "Thelma and Louise", end the date by punching her in the cunt. And never see her again.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:30 PM
5

It's a Pick Up Artist, a man who has learned that the vast majority of women predictably respond to certain dating techniques.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:11 PM
6

But we're comparing Iraq To Vietnam where men DID get to take typewriter breaks. So that war wasn't quite all out enough? And please don't bring up WWII, where millions upon millions of men died while women worked in factories.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 05:43 AM
12

Well, let's put an assault rifle in a woman's hand and a typewriter in a man's and then we can talk about men being treated well ... I guess...
/r/MensRights03/07/09 05:24 AM
4

The fact that she is the first woman ever to be given life in prison should tell you right away that Autralia's judicial system is biased against men. I wonder how many men have been given life sentences there.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:50 AM
0

The sad thing is after reading this article by this ballbusting shrill dyke, I found the first vestiges of sympathy for Sanford. He of course should resign immediately. He failed his constituency in a way no other politician with a sex scandal has, at least to my mind. But maybe that's where the sympathy for him comes from. He had to have known he was committing political suicide. That must be one great piece of pussy.
/r/MensRights03/07/09 04:47 AM
0

Porn? Is that the industry where the women make ten times what the men make? (at least...) Prostitution and stripping? Is that where whores want to make "easy" money? You do know 93% of people killed on the job are male right? Are you really trying to compare sex to death?
/r/MensRights02/07/09 03:48 AM
-4

Did you just respond to me three different times in the space of 7 hours? Wow... I always wanted a stalker! Ladder Theory does NOT apply to both sexes. As you would know if you had read ... oh ... maybe to the second page. I guess ultimately this boils down to two things. You have a very loose definition of "friend". Which is fine. It's just much looser than mine. And two, I never insulted your intelligence. In fact, I'd say you're much MUCH smarter than your husband anyway. Congratulations!
/r/MensRights01/07/09 02:46 AM
-5

That's just adorable. A (married) woman who's read Ladder Theory and thinks she understands it. Of course you as a woman claim you have tons of male friends. Every woman covets male friends. Men make better friends than women. Catty, vindictive competitiveness tends to place a burden on friendships. That said, if those mens' choice of action is that predictable if you came out of the bathroom naked, how do you think they perceive this dynamic? And how does your husband feel about all of this? Ar…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 07:32 PM
-2

Are you from 1952?
/r/MensRights30/06/09 12:39 AM
-4

If he didn't read it, how can he possibly know it's the wrong subreddit?! And where do people get off, telling other people where to post?
/r/MensRights30/06/09 12:39 AM
-3

I didn't read Archgod's comment before making mine. This is another guy who feels like you knew the answer to this question before you asked it.
/r/MensRights30/06/09 12:36 AM
0

I think Tomek brings up an intersting point. You created an account just to ask this question. Then you only asked it in /MR. Forgive me for playing amateur Freud here... The consensus you would get from /MR is somewhat predictable. It's also telling to me whhich of these comments you've responded to the most robustly. None of this makes you a bad person. None of this makes you wrong. I think you already know you need to break up with her. I think you knew that before you came here. You just nee…
/r/MensRights30/06/09 12:32 AM
-1

What cards do we have all of exactly?
/r/MensRights28/06/09 11:41 AM
15

If you're sitting down on a crowded bus and give your seat to a woman, you're a fool. Unless she's VERY pregnant or VERY elderly. And I'd give up my seat to an elderly man too. I agree. Chivalry is dead. Good riddance.
/r/MensRights28/06/09 11:40 AM
4

Your honesty about your decision between A and B is refreshing. I totally agree with you of course. And when you accept that being raped is better than going to prison for a crime you didn't commit, it then falls into place that making a false rape accusation should be punished EXTREMELY harshly. I tell people I want false rape accusers to do the full sentence that a rapist would do and they balk. But who's really doing more damage?
/r/MensRights28/06/09 11:38 AM
-8

Female friends? Why?
/r/MensRights27/06/09 02:33 AM
2

You're a troll. I know that, you know that. So why does it STILL seem to me that smashing your face in would be a great pleasure?
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:47 PM
-2

PM sent.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:34 PM
-1

PM sent.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:33 PM
-1

PM sent.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:33 PM
0

No. I don't change positions a lot, you fucking liar. The ban was unfair from jump. The ban was because of gingerrot's whining, no matter how much you try to disingenuously lie about it now. You banned me for comments made outside of the subreddit you ineptly moderate. Who was in the wrong, you gutless faggot coward? Care to answer ONE fucking question in the history of your useless life?
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:15 PM
-1

perceived slight. Wow... I tell you what, dude... You even being here is the height of hypocrisy. Enjoying the freedom you're too lazy and inept to give to me. The freedom you fucking OWE me. I tell you what... what I have to tell you is really best told to all six of you. And since I can't post it to /Equalitylol, I'll just copypasta a PM for you.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:12 PM
0

Oh, and I thought you were against the whole "downvote because you disagree" thing? I ALWAYS downmod anything I disagree with. The difference is I don't have twenty sockpuppets and do it like a coward like your good friends Mooshiga, Aerik, and lawyergirl. I tell you WHY I'm downmodding.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 05:07 PM
-3

Oh and by the way, about 1% of hip hop is worth a shit. I'd be willing to bet a decent amount of money that your taste in music sucks ass.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 02:37 PM
-2

Why don't you click on them and read what you wrote, you fucking imbecilic moron?
/r/MensRights26/06/09 02:32 PM
1

Dude, I'm still waiting to hear the argument. Still ... waiting... You can rationalize your utter failure to come up with anything that isn't ridiculous all you want. It's because of me, it's because of my tone. I know one thing though. The total disparity (and your personal disconnect) between the way I was treated in that subreddit and the way Aerik is treated is just one more shining beacon of the /Equality moderators' hypocrisy. I don't have to invent ways the other side is bad. I don't have…
/r/MensRights26/06/09 02:31 PM
1

Am I still banned? Did I invent that?
/r/MensRights26/06/09 02:26 PM
-3

I comprehended just fine. I even agreed with part of what you were saying. Your analogy was still terrible. Oh and keeping unpopular opinions to yourself is a pussy move. But it's even worse on a site like reddit where you can be anonymous.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 04:02 AM
-4

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8t50d/tackling_domestic_violence_against_men_a_victim/c0aclke http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8sul5/man_called_sleazy_for_acting_like_a_feminist/c0acoyt http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8tort/female_mma_fighter_chokes_unsuspecting_reporter/c0aeqgn How many more should I post, you fucking troll?
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:57 AM
-3

Do you actually believe that over the years, and even today, that there aren't women being victimized in high numbers? Over the years.... nobody gives a flying FUCK what women of 1950 had to deal with. It's irrelevant. What do women have to deal with that is unfair TODAY? Not in some backwater shithole in Africa. Here, in the Western world. Nothing.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:40 AM
-2

Perhaps instead of making nonsensical comments, trying to compensate for what a pussy you are, you could actually educate yourself until you were worthy of debating us. (starts holding breath)
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:36 AM
1

Even if every word Theusastro says is correct (and I think he's right), that still doesn't mean you're not welcome here.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:35 AM
-1

I'd like to hear you say what it means. Then I'd like you to tell me the last time you thought it was even remotely relevant to the United States.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:32 AM
0

Your analogy sucks. Imagine if someone went to your subreddit and downmodded EVERYTHING because they hate music. But then they didn't even have the courage of their convictions to explain why they were doing it.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 03:30 AM
0

Until we get the gutless coward traitor men amongst us to stand with us, we'll never get anything by asking. It's time to get militant and make demands.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 01:54 AM
1

pn6's post of MBB posts that were not only allowed but posted BY Saydrah and yet WBB not being allowed was very damning. Ask them about draft registration and they hem and haw about being opposed to conscription altogether. Ask them what they have to legitimately complain about and they come up with laughers like this from xzxzzx... Almost every gender issue hurts both sides. Yes, women are granted custody of children in more cases than they should (for example) -- but why? Because they're "the …
/r/MensRights26/06/09 01:40 AM
1

Whether I want to post there has nothing to do with whether I am banned or not. Whether I want to post there is none of you or Saydrah or anyone else's fucking business. Keep me banned or unban me. Do whatever. I'd hate for you to have to exert thirty seconds of effort and then put up with the political pressure of MISANDRIST DYKE CUNTS who can't believe that they actually have to listen to a contrary opinion. All six of you are absolutely worthless as mods. The fact that I am still banned answe…
/r/MensRights26/06/09 01:33 AM
0

Now why do you INSTANTLY get the entire gist of my argument and I have to belabor this point over and over to xzxzzx? Thanks for your support.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 01:29 AM
0

This is the feminist version of debate. They say you're not worthy of debating and then say nothing. I've been more polite and more civil and more pateint than any of you deserve.
/r/MensRights26/06/09 01:28 AM
0

I'm sorry that we disagree on the value of my time vs. the value of unbanning someone who's said he doesn't care if he's unbanned and won't post there anyway. Really I am, but since it's my time, and I don't see the practical value of spending it in the way you suggest, we'll probably just have to disagree. You guys fucked up. Yet you expect ME to apologize for it, and kiss your asses. It aint happening, buddy. I have defended you guys and fought to get Saydrah and anyone else who was banned her…
/r/MensRights26/06/09 12:22 AM
1

Was it wrong that I was banned? If the answer is yes, then rectify the wrong. I think you're dramatically overstating the effort, time, and drama that would be involved. And even if you're correct, what's right is right. Was I behaving like a troll? Using whatever language I felt necessary to get my message across to simpletons who downvote because they have NO argument? Whatever you accuse me of now, you cannot POSSIBLY say Aerik doesn't do with every single post. And to ban me FROM EQUALITY fo…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 11:22 PM
1

You did. But you're missing the point. I have to come to you guys and ASK to be unbanned. You and Saydrah agree that I never should have been banned in the first place. So why do I have to ask anything? I'm not swallowing my pride. I shouldn't have to. And posting in /Equality would be a pointless exercise anyway, for reasons I've already detailed. I'm also dead serious that lawyergirl/gingerroot or whatever sockpuppet she's hiding behind now owes me an apology and should be compelled to give me…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 09:53 PM
1

Nubius, I know you're trying to explain a difficult subject but don't mention alimony anymore. It has nothing to do with this discussion. Alimony and child support are not the same.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 09:32 PM
1

That's not the same as .... HERE.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 09:30 PM
0

No offense but I'm not confusing anything. Until you mentioned it, alimony wasn't even involved in this discussion. And I went to college with some rich kids whose parents were refusing to help them pay for higher education. So unless we pass some laws mandating that BOTH parents HAVE to pay for college, then I don't see how you can force a father to pay child support for someone who by all legal definitions is no longer a child or even a dependent.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 09:26 PM
-1

And where are our equalist/egalitarin feminists on this issue?
/r/MensRights25/06/09 07:04 AM
-1

How can ANYONE argue for child support from the age of 18 to 21? I mean who is passing these fucking laws? If a judge told me I had to pay child support for an 18, 19 or 20 year old kid, I would give the money to the child directly, even if it meant jail. How can a mother still be entitled to anything?
/r/MensRights25/06/09 07:04 AM
2

I don't think he should be able to force her to give the baby up for adoption... but if she DOESN'T, I don't think she should be able to hold him responsible for financial support, now or ever. And am I reading this right? Although the child in this new case is as yet unborn, the state of California has already served our prospective plaintiff with legal documents, seeking to force him into a financial obligation for this child. How is the child's paternity even resolved yet? I know prenatal DNA…
/r/MensRights25/06/09 07:00 AM
5

And I believe the ONLY reason cooldarkplace is banned is because she is a mod for /Equality. I think I'll go ask her.
/r/MensRights25/06/09 02:22 AM
3

You're either for men's issues or you're against them. It IS us vs. them.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 06:17 PM
8

I see we have some gutless anonymous downmodders in here this morning! Welcome!
/r/MensRights24/06/09 06:16 PM
8

Their terms are that I have to ask to be unbanned. My terms are that I should have been automatically unbanned and gingerroot should be forced to apologize to me or she should be banned. She did say "He goes or I go". But what does it matter? Aerik posted a disgusting man-hating blog which I dissected piece by piece and since noone could/would debate with me, they downvoted me to -10 in an hour. There was something very visceral about the reaction to my grapefruit spoon comment. It's a big hilar…
/r/MensRights24/06/09 06:12 PM
9

This might work. The more you believe it, the more likely it will. What is more romantic? The couple that stay together because they have rings on one another's fingers and a piece of paper that says they're a couple? Or the couple that stay together just because they enjoy one another's company? And stay strong either way. You're right. You gain nothing from getting married.
/r/MensRights24/06/09 05:38 PM
3

Both Saydrah and xzxzzx offered to let me return and have been very cool about it. I hold no grudges. Let's just say their terms do not match my terms. And I agree with the OP that it is not anything resembling "equality" anyway. So why bother?
/r/MensRights24/06/09 04:47 PM
4

I'd like to go to /Equality... but I've been banned...
/r/MensRights24/06/09 11:29 AM
2

Troll.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 07:33 AM
3

Gosh, in a fantasy world, you'd be exactly right. But since REAL people adapt titles and call themselves descriptives like "feminists" with methodologies and motives across the gamut, you're dead wrong. And while you may be right that the original term "feminist" meant equalist, most people who self-identify as feminists are not interested in equality at all, only female supremacy... which for all intents and purposes, they have achieved.
/r/MensRights17/06/09 07:04 AM
1

Still waiting.....
/r/MensRights17/06/09 06:59 AM
1

You're not dragging me anywhere, you fucking pussy. I'll get you down on the ground and kick your teeth down your throat and smash your face until your facial bones are just powder, mixed with the jelly of your brain and your skin. Again. Now go get me a beer, pussy.
/r/MensRights16/06/09 10:56 AM
1

Care to maybe explain this submission with its moronic title?
/r/MensRights16/06/09 10:53 AM
-2

People on the MR forum complain about women fighting over trivial stuff like this. We do? Like what? It's these little things that add up to form an overall societal pattern of behavior.
/r/MensRights16/06/09 05:28 AM
16

That's the thing. Form a country club where men can get away from women and they'll sue to get in. But reverse the genders and everything is fine. I'm REALLY getting tired of breast cancer anyway. It's time to talk about prostate cancer for the next twenty years until we get equitable funding for its research. I DON'T think what this guy did was wrong. And I find it ironic that a douchebag like Reilly would call him "spineless" when this guy is standing up for what he believes in while Reilly wr…
/r/MensRights16/06/09 05:11 AM
1

Men like you are a bigger problem than any woman.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 06:29 PM
1

You've made half of my argument for me. Why do we half to dissect violent crime and find a special little subset where women are victimized more? When you have to go looking to find where you're being victimized, it's tougher for me to drudge up some sympathy for you when men are being victimized everywhere. But here's the important part. Women being victims of sexual assaults is as irrelevant as men being the victim of more violent crime overall. Why? Because it isn't societal or institutionali…
/r/MensRights15/06/09 06:17 PM
1

I was being sooooo sarcastic. The guys who recognize me upvoted me back. At one point I was -3, which made me a sad, sad panda.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 06:10 PM
2

Breast cancer is also very common but rarely fatal. You don't have to treat them equally but you can FUND them equally.
/r/MensRights15/06/09 03:58 AM
3

Great article and great submission. Thanks, NotPhil. Thanks for also offering constructive help rather than cowardly anonymous downmods.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 09:14 PM
4

You must really hate women to blame the victim like that.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 09:08 PM
0

I bet this is a great article and I'd love to read what Farrell has to say, even though I occasionally disagree with him. But I'm not registering with the NYT to read it.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 08:50 PM
1

I equate "Why is this in Mens Rights?" with the guys who are always on every lolcat pic and Craigslist post trying to ruin the fun with "This is older than the internet". Who cares if it's old and who cares if YOU'VE seen it before. It's the same mentality for "Why is this in /MR?". This isn't relevant for me = this isn't relevant for anyone according to me = you shouldn't be allowed to post this here.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 07:55 PM
2

I'm not saying that people should post anything they want here. But I think anything that even nominally involves men, our roles in cultures or societies, our self-perceptions or even how we're perceived... belongs here.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 07:15 PM
1

Dude, post whatever you want in MensRights. If people don't like it, they can downvote it. Etherspirit defended it being here very well elsewhere in these comments so I'll let it go.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 03:24 AM
0

I had no choice but to upmod you. And you know I didn't want to! But you did ask a fair question that didn't get answered. In fairness to Etherspirit, he didn't make the assertion and doesn't have to defend it IMO.
/r/MensRights14/06/09 03:21 AM
3

First, welcome! Let me admit, that a true student of the feminist movement and its history would destroy me debating the subtleties there because I don't know as much as I should. And I must admit, when I think of TRULY militant radical feminists like Andrea Dworkin, that bears out what you're saying because she didn't really become notable until the late 70s I believe. We still do not earn the same wages for the same job A woman who has the same education, experience, no children, and is willin…
/r/MensRights13/06/09 07:58 PM
2

So, kanuk... What about Saydrah? And if you don't mind my asking, how many of those other 5 users who are banned are also mods of /Equality? I'd also say that a subreddit this size probably needs more than one mod. I don't know how you feel about this or the community but 4800 users and one mod...
/r/MensRights12/06/09 11:02 PM
1

Thank you, Sir. Now you get the credit and the karma. I have asked several people in the past to resubmit stuff to this subreddit and you're the first to comply. From now, I'm going to ask, wait 24 hours, and steal the submission. A lot of people don't ask OR wait, they just steal. Thanks again.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 07:53 PM
1

You know what's funny. I dislike "Twelve Angry Men" and I'm a huge film guy. I think the plot is preachy, Henry Fonda's character is too perfect, and despite the fact that film was made in 1959(?), a few of the actors are still subscribing to the less natural 30s and 40s style of acting. I'd say it's up there with "Easy Rider" as perhaps one of the most overrated films of all time. I have a funny feeling you disagree.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 07:23 PM
2

We can't ask pn6. He's gone. We can't ask Saydrah in here, because she's banned. We can't ask kanuk876 if all 6 of the /Equality mods are banned (which I suspect) because he's been gone for 5 days (and counting). Since kanuk876 HAS been gone for 5 days, until he returns, this discussion is academic anyway. But, as I have said elsewhere in this thread, pn6 had a reputation for banning a lot of people from this subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 09:42 AM
1

Dr, do you know what would happen if I was in a jry room and announced to the other jurors that I didn't care what any of them said, I didn't agree with the specific law so I was voting innocent until they all did too or hanging the jury? Can I get in trouble for that?
/r/MensRights12/06/09 04:27 AM
0

Ann, did you know 4% of men right now in the US who are raising a child they're sure is their own are wrong? 1 in 25. I tell men all the time. Do NOT sign the birth certificate. And INSIST on paternity testing if you have the tiniest inkling of a doubt.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 04:19 AM
4

Women want the same responsibility and equality They do? If you're saying YOU do, fine. But I have never heard the women's right movement or any of its leaders saying what you just said. They're all about rights and equality... just not equal responsibility. Now, again, you might disagree with that and I'm sure there is a minority of feminists who agree. But a movement will always be judged by the actions and words of its leaders. Feminism has been led by women interested only in what they could…
/r/MensRights12/06/09 04:17 AM
2

WOW! Nice find, Red. "Those pictures are misogynistic!" "Why?" "Because I say so!"
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:45 AM
3

I would respond that we don't have an identical situation so they can't prove I'm wrong. Then I would point to the sentencing discrepancies between men and women for every other crime and tell them that the burden of proof was on them. I guess if you wanted to be a real militant about it, you could say that every time a man is sentenced to prison at all, even for male-on-male crime, it is a /MR issue.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:42 AM
7

Women's rights movements never had to operate that way, because society already viewed them as an oppressed group that needed liberation. Unless I'm misunderstanding you, this is wrong. The early feminist movement was radical AND militant. And it had to be. If I went back in time, I would support those women 100% (or at least 90%) because they were fighting things that were truly unjust. Unlike today's spoiled women who just want to sit around and bitch about equal rights but NOT complain about …
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:37 AM
3

What issues do women face in today's society? Issues that men don't face in equal or greater numbers? Nothing. There is NOTHING that feminists can legitimately complain about anymore and when I have asked women on numerous occasions to explain what they have to bitch about, they fall back to plan B. Insults. I know women complain about domestic violence. Many women mistakenly believe that they are the victim more often than men. What I DON'T hear, at least not very often is "feminists" decrying …
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:33 AM
12

I don't think someone with a 47IQ should be wandering the streets. At all. Whether they've committed a crime or not. I am no expert on IQ levels but I believe that is REALLY low, like too low to even do the most basic care for themselves. That said, there HAS to be a better place for them than tossing them in general population in a prison. That's like a lamb to the slaughter. And you know what INSTANTLY makes it a /MR to me? The fact that switching the sexes of at least the perp if not the vict…
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:15 AM
2

IANAL. I cannot remember the legal term you are referring to but lawyers (well ... DAs probably) don't want you to know you have that option and they try to hush hush it.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:12 AM
2

I DEFINITELY misunderstood yours. Sorry if I got defensive. Dealing with the lowest common denominator all day put me on the defensive. My apologies.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:08 AM
1

Deal with the admins privately. I do not have to do what you say. I think I'll take a page from your playbook. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights12/06/09 12:07 AM
2

Well, we have to be who we are. I'd love for this subreddit to be the most popular place on the net but we're delivering a message that isn't totally mainstream (yet).
/r/MensRights11/06/09 10:13 PM
10

Women not having to register for the draft. Medical issues. Breast cancer vs. prostate cancer. Life expectancy gap. Paternity issues. Educational gaps (which I believe Ann alluded to)
/r/MensRights11/06/09 10:08 PM
1

It's a terrible subreddit anyway. Misandry run rampant. And don't give me too much credit. One of our more eloquent brethren in here submitted the Oprah clip. I just made my sociopathic comment. Which I stand by today. And thanks for upvoting Ann. He was my proxy in there.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 10:00 PM
1

For the THIRD time... See the little arrows to the left of every comment and every submission? Use them. Are you a bottomfeeder? I don't know. I don't even know where you came up with that. Are you a whiner? Definitely. Hey, you're right! I DO feel better!
/r/MensRights11/06/09 09:56 PM
1

WBB posts are why some people don't like this subreddit. So how do you feel about the MBB posts in /Equality? It's really a very simple question.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 09:53 PM
2

The Black Panthers had a motto. If you're not for us, you're against us. I agree with this. In my opinion, any woman who can rally for female rights and "equality" and be indifferent to male issues, is automatically not interested in equality. They are interested in furthering their own agenda. I don't blame them. Furthering one's own interests is human nature. But don't then turn around and say you're an equalist or an egalitarian. You're TRULY a feminist, what that word means and implies. You'…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 07:47 PM
1

How do you feel about MBB posts? And read that offensive comment one more time. See if you can tell if I was joking.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 07:39 PM
5

It's possible your definition of "feminist" is different from what we perceive the majority of feminists to be. Most feminists deserve to be bashed. Some don't. There are equalists/egalitarians and there are female supremacists. And never the twain shall meet.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 06:39 PM
3

And lie about it and try to act like superficiality is a one-way street, an unfair double standard only they have to deal with. They lie about what they want, lie about what they DON'T want and then complain about what we want ... when they want the same fucking thing.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 06:10 PM
1

So before women's lib, women who stayed home were mooches?
/r/MensRights11/06/09 06:07 PM
1

I still disagree but I think that's an excellent point. That's an very good analogy.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:38 PM
2

Thanks, Kuonji. Someone must have told her that "girl" was promoting the cause of the patriarchy or something.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:37 PM
8

I said (IN ANOTHER SUBREDDIT, this comment was NOT made IN /Equality) that if a woman ever castrated me like Lorena Bobbitt that I would carve out her genitals with a rusty grapefruit spoon. This was on a thread discussing the fact that an Oprah audience laughed as Bobbitt recounted driving with one hand because her husband's penis was in her other hand. I don't find that funny at all. I do not personally know anyone from Reddit, much less gingerroot. Yet, somehow, gingerroot decided that that w…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:34 PM
1

Why don't you feel welcome here?
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:24 PM
1

OK, but what we have here is everyone who disagrees with us is banned. I may be advocating one extreme but what we have is the opposite extreme. I think a GOOD moderator might occasionally review the rules and see how effective they are and whether they meet the current community's needs. I don't think Reddit needs the level of moderation that almost any other forum would. If somebody was being directly targeted, threatened, or harrassed, then that individual situation could be assessed case-by-…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:11 PM
1

This is the second time I've gotten involved in something like this. The first time I was banned against my will. Sorry about that. Sorry you had to deal with the inconvenience of my getting banned. Now this time, in a community that gets only a couple new submissions a day, I wanted to see how other people felt about this so I could decide what my options were. Frankly, dude, I wouldn't care how you felt if you were a regular in here. I care even less seeing you post to /MR once every two or th…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:01 PM
1

What does it take? Who should be banned and why? Should Saydrah be banned?
/r/MensRights11/06/09 04:55 PM
1

How do you feel about MBB posts?
/r/MensRights11/06/09 04:53 PM
2

Aerik is a disgusting pig and is female. I know s/he claims to be male but she slipped up and told me a story of getting raped that included female details. By the way, the rape in question? He asked her repeatedly. That was the force he used to rape Aerik and that's why he should go to prison for 20 years. Male or female, it's insane and a troll. But I wouldn't even ban her. I could be wrong about Saydrah but I trust my instincts. I think she would frequently disagree with us IF she ever even c…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:37 AM
5

I was banned by Saydrah at a user's request. The user, gingerroot, had been a Reddit user for ONE DAY, and told Saydrah that if I didn't go, she would. Saydrah looked at my most recent comments (which WERE pretty vile) and made a snap decision that I was a troll. She admitted she was wrong within a day. She told me she would reinstate me. You're preaching to the choir about /Equality with me, my friend. But I don't blame Saydrah for my banning. I blame gingerroot. And I blame about five other us…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 05:16 AM
1

My hunch is it isn't her who carpet downmods. I agree with you that it is done but... who cares? It doesn't really affect us either way. And I'm 99% sure I know who does it because she made an incriminating comment to me. And it isn't Saydrah.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:45 AM
3

Sigh. Do you have a problem with me? Since you ARE referring to me, correct? I hope you don't mind if I do whatever I like. I apologize to you for the future inconvenience of downmodding what you don't want to look at. Shit, it must take all of a second each time.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:38 AM
1

(goes back to playing Luxor and listening to Megadeth)
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:33 AM
1

I strongly disagree. I'd take it up the butt. But I don't blame you for not seeing them as equal crimes. I guess I don't really either. But we can definitely agree that false rape should be punished severely.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:31 AM
2

Nothing personal yourself but... I'm not "trying to appear" anything. I am opposed to censorship of any kind. Take a poll of all of the regular users here and see whether they consider /Equality a men's rights echo chamber, if that's what you're implying. If you're implying that THIS is the echo chamber, then why juxtapose that with the fact that you would have banned me too? I did protest my ban. And others here protested for me. And as I have stated elsewhere in this thread, I was told I could…
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:24 AM
1

True of Springer as well.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 03:13 AM
0

Cattle, I have no ulterior motives. It is MY choice that I am still banned there. Both Saydrah AND xyxyyx offered to reinstate me at will. I don't expect you to believe me. So ask Saydrah. I don't blame you for being skeptical with our history together but I swear to you that the reasons I want Saydrah (and everyone else) unbanned are for the reasons I have already detailed and nothing more.
/r/MensRights11/06/09 01:43 AM
2

He hasn't posted anything in 4 days.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 11:18 PM
2

I upmodded you FWIW. I agree about the sister. That's where his righteousness ended IMO. I disagree about the fate SHE deserved (with the reservation I noted and that you also brought up about whether she freed him or not). I'll also add to your unPC comments with my own. He was an Iraqi immigrant who appears in his picture to be Arabic. My guess is he wasn't named for the boxer. By the way, the rule I always heard for ages dating was divide your (male) age by 2, round down and add 7. So a 29 ye…
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:36 PM
-1

The only reason I disagree with Ann that she deserved what she got was because she may have freed him by dropping the charge. The article is vague on exactly why his charge was dropped. Where do YOU stand on whether she deserved it? On the broader question of abuse victims lashing out at their abusers? I'd ask Cattle over there too but (s)he is such a misandrist I already know the double standard doublespeak I'd get.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:31 PM
1

But, Master, what if I accuse you of raping me and you go up the river for a long ride? Now what are the odds YOU'RE going to be raped in prison. I've heard several times that this is an overstated danger of incarceration but it's possible. And also... I put a gun to your head and offer you a choice. Either you let me rape you OR I'm going to throw you in a concrete enclosure, 5 feet by 10 feet and release you in 20 years. Which would you choose? Rape is worse than a false rape accusation only u…
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:23 PM
0

Of what if you don't mind my asking? Just so everyone knows, I did this at my own impetuous whim. Saydrah has nothing to do with this and I don't even know if she wants to come back. I also have no clue just how many people are banned from here.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:16 PM
2

That's a good question. Probably. It might depend on the circumstances but usually. I guess it doesn't matter since they can be banned from Reddit for spamming, not just subreddits (I think).
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:02 PM
0

If this were a normal forum, I'd probably agree with you. But where any post can be quickly hidden and forgotten, I wouldn't ban anyone... except MAYBE spammers.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 10:01 PM
3

Even if a post was needed to get most people banned, it wouldn't have for Saydrah. Pn6 banned all 6 mods from /Equality (I think...)and she is one of them.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:58 PM
2

Hi there! And welcome!
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:57 PM
6

Cattle, are you being sarcastic? /hugs
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:26 PM
2

I suppose you Men's Rights folks like good excuses to hate on some broad, yah? (looks around) ... (raises hand)
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:25 PM
0

This is a WBB post (woman behaving badly) that I personally DO think belongs here. It probably doesn't serve the overall discourse but I likes to hate me some womenfolk from time to time!
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:22 PM
3

Thanks, Ann. I'd also like to see more mods in here and you'd be a prime candidate IMHO. But that's a battle I'll fight another day.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:21 PM
6

According to her, for essentially nothing. And I believe her. pn6, by his own admission, banned people quite freely. I think Saydrah and I would disagree about a lot. I say I THINK since she and I haven't gone head-to-head too often ... since she's banned. But she's intelligent, eloquent and unlike me, is capable of expressing a civil opinion. I don't know who is and isn't banned but I would unban EVERYONE including my personal nemesis, gingerroot, and Reddit's biggest misandrist, Aerik. Now if …
/r/MensRights10/06/09 09:19 PM
2

Thanks, Kuonji. Guys, I do appreciate the anonymous upvotes but it would be more effective to SEE who agrees and who doesn't.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 08:32 PM
8

I'd say 80% paternity tests, 10% troubled teen girls, 10% all other shows. It's a guilty pleasure but I love the paternity test shows and I'm disappointed when any of his other archtypes are on. He really does seem to me like a nice guy who got caught up in making a deal with the devil. He's getting fucking paid!
/r/MensRights10/06/09 08:26 PM
15

And for that matter, neither should anyone else. We banned the guy the other day for being a blogspammer and I'm even a little ambiguous over that. It's so easy here at Reddit to just downvote what you dislike and move on. I am not a moderator and this isn't my subreddit. So this is all just my opinion. I know that pn6 was the original creator of this place and he swung the banhammer pretty liberally. I disagreed with that then and I do now. I am banned from /Equality. So I know as well as anyon…
/r/MensRights10/06/09 08:10 PM
7

I watch "Maury" every day and revel in other human beings in misery. But this show makes me literally queasy.
/r/MensRights10/06/09 06:02 PM
4

And a year's supply of RiceARoni, the San Francisco treat!
/r/MensRights10/06/09 05:56 PM
3

Both? I'd say it's a disturbing (but not totally unpredictable) trend viewed from a sociological viewpoint. But on a case by case basis, I think each individual owes themselves the pursuit of their own happiness.
/r/MensRights09/06/09 04:16 PM
1

So when women were underperforming, you lay the blame on "societal factors". What shall we blame for men underperforming?
/r/MensRights08/06/09 06:55 AM
8

I'd like a citation on that RIDICULOUS statistic of yours.
/r/MensRights08/06/09 06:41 AM
5

Give it a few more years. The way they are crushing us in high school graduation, college attendance and graduation, we'll soon get to be the sex that demands they pay for everything.
/r/MensRights06/06/09 08:36 PM
7

RIP, Jerry Reed Well, I guess it was back in sixty-three When eatin' my cookin' got the better of me So I asked this little girl I was goin' with To be my wife Well, she said she would So I said, "I do" But I'd-a said "I wouldn't" if I'd-a just knew How sayin' "I do" was gonna screw up all my o' my life Well, the first few years weren't all that bad I'll never forget the good times we had 'Cause I'm reminded every month When I send her the child support Well, it wasn't too long till the lust was…
/r/MensRights06/06/09 10:02 AM
1

Why do you feel the need to bring up the plight of women outside the industrialized Western nations? They are IRRELEVANT to ALL male/female arguments here.
/r/MensRights06/06/09 09:54 AM
2

Wow. Cresur just fucking demolished you.
/r/MensRights06/06/09 09:50 AM
0

Sunshine feminism. It's been around for forty years. It isn't going anywhere. Self-loathing is a fundamental part of many people's mental make-up.
/r/MensRights06/06/09 09:43 AM
3

You do of course realize that if a predatory female gets pregnant, the young boy can be forced to pay child support, right? These young men ARE victims, whether they consented or not. They are not old enough to consent or sign legal contracts but they are old enough to have their lives ruined.
/r/MensRights05/06/09 09:41 AM
4

I kind of agree with you. But the comment by the cop reflects a societal attitude which men must fight tooth and nail, that being that false rape accusations don't really harm anyone. And I would like to see women serving 20 years to life for their FIRST false rape accusation so it doesn't do anything for me to know that she's going to be slapped on the wrist. Still, you're right. She IS being prosecuted. Many of them aren't even slapped on the wrist.
/r/MensRights05/06/09 03:00 AM
7

Did you guys enjoy the very end? "We're in a budget crisis citywide, and it's very frustrating to put the amount of resources out there toward this case - we're already talking about positions not being filled," Flanagan said. "It is frustrating on a couple of different fronts." So she victimized other future (false?) rape victims and she also victimized the budget-minded city. So this moron went looking for more victims and still couldn't find this innocent male.
/r/MensRights04/06/09 02:07 PM
0

I completely agree and I would have happily joined in on the beating. I guess this is like the end of "Mystic River". Some people are willing to take a chance on being wrong to enforce a moral code.
/r/MensRights04/06/09 11:53 AM
1

So this would be her third offense. I wonder... what criminal penalty for false rape accusations does a self-loathing man-hater like yourself think the penalty should be?
/r/MensRights04/06/09 11:47 AM
2

It should have. Sunshine feminism at its finest.
/r/MensRights04/06/09 11:15 AM
0

Why start debating now, right?
/r/MensRights04/06/09 11:14 AM
2

Men betraying men. Did any of that seem familiar to you, Cattle?
/r/MensRights04/06/09 01:39 AM
1

Dude, I pretty much agree with you and disagree with Masterofshadows. But "Apparently I have struck a nerve with you." is NOT insulting or trolling. I think from this comment on, you totally overreacted to him. He's on our side. Let's save the rage for our real enemies.
/r/MensRights04/06/09 01:29 AM
1

Care to cite ONE example?
/r/MensRights04/06/09 12:46 AM
3

I actually think we CAN marginalize female circumcision and honor killings because I live in the US. Those are issues that feminists bring up to deflect arguments they have no real defense for like some of the issues you've named, as well as discrepancies in education, criminal law and medicine. I think men's rights have to be addressed locally before we should have to worry about female smokescreens globally. Also, we shouldn't have to prove men are as good at parenting as women. They should ha…
/r/MensRights03/06/09 12:44 PM
1

Women who believe in REAL equality... who want equal rights and also want to shoulder equal responsibilities... let's just say I expect them along anytime now. Walking hand in hand with the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny of course.
/r/MensRights03/06/09 12:33 PM
3

Could you elaborate a little bit? What are you saying? And how is it relevant to /MR? Not being a dick. I just have no clue where you're coming from.
/r/MensRights02/06/09 10:11 AM
3

This post is awesome, Kanuk. It's so badly written, by a woman who can barely think and then has the audacity to call herself a counselor, that we can have a lot of fun with this. Maybe later, when I have more time, I'll pick it apart, point by point. Edit - Of course, it's interesting to look at this user's (short) history. Nothing but submissions from this site. And the site sucks by the way...
/r/MensRights01/06/09 03:52 AM
5

Women cheat almost as much as men. And when women cheat, they often lie about the paternity of children with longtime partners. In my opinion, it is therefore WORSE when women cheat.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 03:45 AM
4

The alleged victim, in an interview Thursday, said she objected to dismissal of the charges. "I was really upset. It's not fair that he gets away with it," she said. "It looks like everything I said was a lie." Now ask yourself if he had REALLY raped her, would that be the reason she was sorry he was getting off on the charges?
/r/MensRights01/06/09 02:22 AM
0

Which people?
/r/MensRights01/06/09 02:13 AM
6

He has no idea about ANYTHING as it pertains to warfare, historical or modern day. War is fought by rulers and powerful and wealthy people, not always men. These rulers send soldiers to die for their causes and the soldiers ARE almost always men.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 02:12 AM
1

Rape is worse than death now? Dude, you're just grasping at straws now. It's really quite pathetic.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 02:10 AM
6

Before you go calling someone a moron, I'd check your own stupidity at the door. in any war, women and children suffer unproportionately This might be the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard. Would you like to count male vs female casualties for ANY major military conflcit? I was just watching a show about the battle of Stalingrad. A BATTLE. Not a war. One theater of operations. 750,000 dead German and Axis soldiers. 100% male. That's probably more male casualties than female casualties in t…
/r/MensRights01/06/09 02:08 AM
8

I'm sure the women who believe in REAL equality will be here to laugh about this with us any second now.
/r/MensRights01/06/09 01:52 AM
1

Only women get to decide what are legitimate issues pertaining to male/female relations.
/r/MensRights31/05/09 06:05 PM
1

And anonymously, gutlessly downmod. Because they have NO real argument. They know that. WE know that. When you try to pin them down and force them to answer questions to ... you know... actually validate and legitimize their "opinions", that's when they'll start with the insults. But you better not insult them back or else your a misogynistic member of the "patriarchy", another term they throw around but none of them can tell you what it really is.
/r/MensRights31/05/09 06:04 PM
1

I'm secretly in love with you and all of this misogynistic grandstanding is just my awkward way of flirting. Also, I hate you.
/r/MensRights30/05/09 11:56 PM
3

I might get really downvoted for this... But I adore children and I'd rather be the victim of paranoia than have someone suspicious of me but decide against alerting someone. I agree with HeroicJeff. I don't know what the solution is.
/r/MensRights30/05/09 08:03 PM
0

I'd also like to hammer home a point that not ONE Redditor ... EVER has ever rebutted... that women suffer NO societal discrimination whatsoever. Not in one arena. Of course if you start them up, they'll start blathering about clitoridectomies in Africa and women can't drive in Saudi Arabia and 1920s and etc, etc, ad infinitum. What is an issue they can legitimately feel aggrieved over?
/r/MensRights30/05/09 07:14 PM
1

Just as you would paint the /MR subreddit as a haven for extremist thought, I'm afraid I have to point out that when the feminist movement started out, THEY were perceived as ridiculous and extremist. I've seen enough of your posts to know how biased and rigid your thinking is. I also know enough about you and your ilk to assume that whatever life partner you had over to check out the new Indigo Girls CD is probably no better a judge of rationality than you.
/r/MensRights30/05/09 07:11 PM
2

When I came in here, you were at 0 yourself Pierce. Good to know that we have so many fair-minded people interested in debate around here. And also good to know that there isn't ANY misandry on Reddit.
/r/MensRights29/05/09 09:50 PM
1

Well, there's only ten stories a day to feed that quest. I'll find them, Cattle. I'll also keep searching for women who aren't misandrist shrews. I'll let you know how that goes as well.
/r/MensRights29/05/09 07:48 AM
3

Only 50% or so think it's hilarious that he got raped.
/r/MensRights28/05/09 05:33 PM
12

"I'm not sure we really need another student organization that focuses on pre-professional development for men," Pan said, noting that, in just the area of business, there were five or six students groups that were gender-neutral. Similarly, Ali Feenstra, a third-year student and a member of the Feminist Majority, questioned Men in Power's utility. "It's like starting 'white men in business' -- there's not really any purpose," she said. I would tell these two young ladies that since they see no …
/r/MensRights28/05/09 04:32 PM
3

Well unfortunately, Cresur, it's STILL the same faces everyday. There's about five of us I feel I can count on for regular commenting. I'll reserve my optimism.
/r/MensRights28/05/09 12:18 PM
4

Even taken in context, her quote is offensive. The suggestion is that white males will be biased in assessing the merits of discrimination cases and a hispanic female will not. Let's say I'm the white male employer accused of discrimination. I guess it's OK for me to want a white male judge since anyone else might not understand the richness of my experiences as a white male? Why is the plaintiff somehow entitled to a judge that might understand their perspective better than mine? Perhaps we sho…
/r/MensRights28/05/09 11:17 AM
2

That's why black Californians overwhelmingly voted against gay marriage right? Because they understand being discriminated against so much they couldn't wait to run out and discriminate against someone else.
/r/MensRights28/05/09 11:09 AM
1

A right doesn't mean I automatically get something. A right means YOU can't deprive me of it. And thus, food and shelter ARE rights as is sex. I see what you're saying which I guess is the same as what I'm saying in a different way. Using your terminology, I have the right to PURSUE sex, food, and shelter and you have no right to stop that pursuit. Happy?
/r/MensRights27/05/09 10:52 AM
0

Reading your other posts in this thread, that pretty much sums up your argument style anyway... I'm right because I'm right and something is because I said so.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 10:49 AM
0

Maybe since YOU posted the statistic that you pulled out of your ass, YOU should be the one doing the citing?
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:53 AM
0

I know. You're still wrong by a MASSIVE factor. If we WEREN'T using contraceptives, you'd be even more ludicrously wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:37 AM
13

The educational system fails boys from the second they enter it. There's a systemic bias against them. I'd like to start by forcing 50% of teaching jobs to be given to men. When so many teachers are women, and this problem is so massive, I have to suspect this is a factor. The current system rewards girls and punishes boys for the ways they inherently learn. Rambunctious, energetic boys are medicated, denigrated as being "problems", or removed altogether. The entire system needs to be overhauled…
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:24 AM
1

That doesn't follow at all. Saying it's NOT a right means it can be denied based on some arbitrary factor. And sex and reproduction aren't the same thing but I would say that that is an inalienable human right as well.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:13 AM
3

Our very own Aerik has told me that he/she was raped by a person who asked and asked until he/she agreed but felt pressured. Aerik says that's rape. I say he/she since Aerik seems a bit confused and I think may be mentally ill. I've seen Aerik claim to be both.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 04:07 AM
1

Having sex is not a right, it's a privilege, and it has consequences. I would say if you were to draft a charter of human rights, then sex would be one of the first two or three you wrote down. In fact, that is so obvious that any omission of such would be because of sheer obviousness.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 03:54 AM
0

When you decide to have sex, you decide to assume the .03% chance that a baby will be made. Not so good with numbers either, huh?
/r/MensRights27/05/09 03:50 AM
5

Having said that, I'm not depositing seed anywhere I'm not ready for it to bear fruit unless I'm in control of the contraceptive. So you're a virgin? Because there is no contraceptive you're in charge of.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 03:48 AM
2

One cannot expect the benefits of demanding custody as a general matter if it is something that can so callously be tossed away. "Hey maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events, but we just got our ASSES kicked pal!" What country do you live in where men have even a legitimate shot at winning custody? Because it isn't the US.
/r/MensRights27/05/09 03:40 AM
0

You mean the femidykes you dragged over here with you? Again, I'll repeat... you can call people names and it's OK... when someone else does it, they're "over the line".
/r/MensRights25/05/09 03:24 PM
1

The hypocrisy however is yours since you admonished me that namecalling was lowering the level of debate. So which is it? Typical feminist. Hold others to a standard you refuse to hold yourself to. Noone blames you. You were raised in an environment where you were conditioned that accountability and responsibility were for others... you just want your RIGHTS!
/r/MensRights24/05/09 10:14 AM
0

I'm male, 44, Australian, raised in mining camps and attended a primary school that taught how to spear and skin animals, paid my way through a first class honours degree in pure / applied mathematics by working as a labourer shovelling for 14 hour shifts and driving 110 tonne haul paks. I'm assuming you posted this mini-bio to defend yourself against my accusation of misandry? I would hope that a single father of a son would be a little more sympathetic to male issues. You realize this is the w…
/r/MensRights23/05/09 07:04 PM
0

Punishment as deterrence has nothing to do with the actual perpetrator. You DO realize this? I'm not suggesting that giving an individual woman a 20 year sentence would deter her from a crime she already committed. I'm suggesting that it would deter OTHER women from committing the same crime. Your "pragmatic response" is really just doublespeak for doing nothing. As I've repeatedly said. I find this tiresome, as I'm sure you do as well. You're not going to convince me and clearly, I'm not going …
/r/MensRights23/05/09 05:45 PM
1

You're hardly the one to suggest someone else think in an evenhanded manner, you misandrist cunt.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 05:28 PM
0

Easily discernible as a question. Asking for you to rebut a comment you later proved you could not but still managed to dodge as long as possible. Question. Bolded. Obviously a general question that you dishonestly tried to manipulate by answering about the specific case in the article. Clearly an interrogative statement that a bright 5 year old would recognize as a question. You're obviously more intelligent than that so I have to conclude you were being evasively disingenuous ... again ... Is …
/r/MensRights23/05/09 05:21 PM
0

I guess we better add pretentiousness to your laundry list of qualities you'll deny. And that's the elephant in the room you're refusing to address. I just want you to stop lying and admit the REAL subtext of your entire argument... Drunk women shouldn't be charged for anything and women should never be charged for making false accusations of rape. 1 What do you think should happen to a woman who makes a false accusation of rape against a man? 2 I will repeat that question or its implication for…
/r/MensRights23/05/09 05:02 PM
-1

Wow! A POSSIBLE jail term and a fine! For possibly sending a man to prison for LIFE! That's equitable! But you're not a misandrist though, amirite?! Funny thing is the raging cunts over at /Equality ALL denied being misandrists and denied even the existence of misandry, even where men and women are clearly treated very differently, solely based on sex. So believe me, you're denial does nothing to convince me nor should it convince anyone else capable of critical thinking.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 04:42 PM
5

Were you hoping for a farewell party or something?
/r/MensRights23/05/09 04:31 PM
0

I didn't ask you about this specific incident. I asked you a general question. I will repeat that question or its implication for a THIRD time. It's obvious to me that you are a raging misandrist and I want you to reveal yourself.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 04:22 PM
0

Accusing someone of rape is worse than any other false accusation other than attempted murder and it isn't even close. What do you think should happen to a woman who makes a false accusation of rape against a man?
/r/MensRights23/05/09 04:09 PM
1

Dr Phil is the biggest misandrist piece of shit on Earth, or at least second to his pigmistress, Oprah.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 04:02 PM
1

Nice dodge. So I guess you're just going to refuse to answer. I'm sure you feel right at home over in /Equality.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 03:44 PM
1

Wrong. While I certainly would charge them for those elements of their escapade as well, the time has come for women to be punished, severely, for making false accusations of sexual assault against men. And that's the elephant in the room you're refusing to address. I just want you to stop lying and admit the REAL subtext of your entire argument... Drunk women shouldn't be charged for anything and women should never be charged for making false accusations of rape.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 03:33 PM
0

Your entire argument is irrational and nonsensical. Did the women know that the cabbie would be in no danger of being arrested when they made their accusation? If they knew that their assertions could be easily disproven and that they were being videotaped, then it kind of makes no sense at all to make those baseless accusations in the first place. They did NOT know that yet they put a man's career and liberty at risk. And now you would have them get off scot free and your rationale for that is …
/r/MensRights23/05/09 03:28 PM
5

Who's REALLY disgusting? The man who takes advantage of his status and situation? Or a woman who clearly has ulterior motives for dishing out her favors? We can call her a gold digger... or we can call her what she really is... a whore. So, I WILL look away... because she's disgusting.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 09:34 AM
1

What does the reality of the life and profession of a cabbie have to do with ANYTHING? Should I be able to rob or beat cabbies? It goes with the territory, right? How about we start holding women accountable for their actions and punishing them equally under the law? How about we TRY that for a while before you arbitrarily declare that it wont work? I'm sorry if you can't debate me or anyone else at /MR. "/Equality" is over there--->. They like your style of argument there. Just keep making bold…
/r/MensRights23/05/09 09:30 AM
2

I have no doubt that he's acting out of consent, or at least he thinks he is. Stockholm syndrome is very real and being trapped into being a parent at a young age by an unbalanced predator has doubtlessly slanted his perceptions. I think he should be able to visit her in prison if he wants... prison being where she should spend the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 08:47 AM
2

So, surely these women considered all the mitigating factors before they made this accusation? They shouldn't be punished because they carefully took into consideration whether the cabbie would be punished before making their maliciously vindictive charge? They committed a crime. Period. One which should be punished by the same measure a guilty rapist would be punished. And one other thing. Please don't excuse the womens' deplorable behavior by including the adjective "drunken". Being intoxicate…
/r/MensRights23/05/09 08:43 AM
6

Tee hee. False allegations that can ruin lives are nothing more than people being "twats". I'm not talking about imprisoning women for making false allegations IN CABS. I'm talking about imprisoning them for false allegations wherever they're made.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 06:28 AM
4

That's because nothing happens to them. Hand out a few twenty year sentences and maybe some sanity will be restored.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 06:18 AM
5

I'm a 34 year old male teacher. I fuck my 13 year old female student, getting her pregnant. I'm given an 89 month sentence which is suspended and reduced to six months and counseling. I don't even serve all of the six months. I'm ordered to have no contact with the girl but I defy those orders, fuck her some more and get her pregnant AGAIN. But don't worry. Instead of being given a much more harsh sentence, I'm only given the sentence for the first crime which I never served. Does that sound abo…
/r/MensRights23/05/09 06:06 AM
2

13 year old boys aren't old enough to consent. But they ARE old enough to create children which they will then be forced to care for their whole lives.
/r/MensRights23/05/09 06:01 AM
1

Really elevating the level of debate. Typical for the feminazis on Reddit. Although I give you credit... you tried a little before your argument was completely overwhelmed by rationality and logic. Most of your brethren skip that and go right to the namecalling and the anonymous downmods. Shoot, it took you all of five minutes to devolve to that! Grats!
/r/MensRights23/05/09 05:35 AM
-1

Did you guys get a look at that BEAST who said she got raped? Sweetie, my guess is you have lifetime rape immunity.
/r/MensRights22/05/09 03:30 PM
4

Any ideas how? Or are we supposed to do that for you too?
/r/MensRights21/05/09 02:16 AM
2

This can just be used every time a man finds out he's not the biological father to force him to pay child support, because "the child's rights are paramount". This has already been the case. Many, many times. In some US states, that is policy. That is why I tell guys all the time... NEVER sign a birth certificate and ALWAYS demand a DNA test if you have the slightest doubt about paternity. In some states, the second you sign the birth certificate, you ARE the father.
/r/MensRights19/05/09 02:52 AM
2

Dude, you're giving me credit for being typical, I think. It used to bother that me that I was "only" average-sized until I saw how few guys are significantly smaller OR larger than average by more than 1/2".
/r/MensRights09/05/09 09:39 PM
4

You've illustrated your point well. And I agree that five seconds is relative. The blink of an eye or eternity, depending on your perspective. And in your example, I WOULD be furious. But I certainly wouldn't get the court system involved. I wouldn't cry rape, even though by this definition, your example IS rape.
/r/MensRights09/05/09 10:34 AM
0

So you're now asking me to choose between being raped and being accused of rape myself? Do I understand this correctly? Well, now we're delving deep into hypotheticals but I will admit I think I'd rather take my chances with the court. Of course, if the system were fair, either my accuser and I would both get to remain anonymous or we'd both be named. I'm not sure how that's relevant but I assume you got the answer you wanted?
/r/MensRights09/05/09 10:28 AM
3

When the murderer themselves admit they didn't do enough time, you know you missed with the sentence by a LONG shot.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:41 PM
1

I want to answer your question but I'm not sure I understand it.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:38 PM
9

I AM from the US where sentences are quite long... if you have a penis. If you have a vagina, you can shoot your sleeping husband in the back and get away essentially scot-free. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Winkler It's funny. All these feminists who claim they are actually humanists... I don't remember any of them protesting that. If the typical UK sentence is 7 years, then give the women 7 years as well.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:11 PM
2

I have never been raped OR falsely imprisoned. But I can make an educated guess that if you told me you were about to put me in prison for the next twenty years and the only way out of it was to let you rape me, I would acquiesce. I say that coldly and logically, under the stress of neither possibility. And maybe I would regret it later. But right now, having experienced neither, it's an easy call.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 10:07 PM
2

I'm sorry. I asked you a direct question. You responded with five sentences and somehow managed to not answer my question. I'm waiting.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:49 PM
2

Have you ever had sex with a woman you didn't want to get pregnant? Have you ever used the rhythm method?
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:27 PM
7

The Misandry subreddit ISN'T banned. They cleverly renamed it "/Equality".
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:22 PM
0

I would contend that a false accusation of rape is much worse than rape, especially as the person is sentenced and then imprisoned. And then the probability that the prison is your new home for a long, long time starts to sink in.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:16 PM
6

Your argument makes sense. But there's two reasons this woman should be thrown in prison for 20-40 years. You might be sending a powerful message to current false accusers not to recant. But you'd also be sending an equally strong message to future possible false accusers that they better think hard before saying the magic word that destroys men's lives. But more important than the deterrant factor either way is that it's the right thing to do. It is justice. Does a woman who falsely makes a rpa…
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:12 PM
3

I find it hilarious that a feminist would come over here to /MR and tell us to justify downvotes. Perhaps you should go trumpet that song to your sisters at "/Equality", where they downvote because they have no argument. Which would you rather have happen to you? Be raped? Or spend the next thirty years in prison for a crime you didn't commit, where there's a small (and overstated I admit) chance you'll be raped anyway? Do justify your downvotes! Hate to be a hypocrite, right?
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:07 PM
5

You're clearly a woman. This is actually the problem with the rhythm method. Because as you near orgasm, you are basically satisfying every primal instinct your body has. Nobody just stops on a dime. You have to tell yourself to stop for a second or two. Maybe with some guys, it's five. But there IS a buffer period where your brain is thinking but your body doesn't want to hear.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 09:00 PM
3

IANAL. But that wouldn't be double jeopardy. That would be another incident, occuring at a different time. It would therefore be prosecutable.
/r/MensRights08/05/09 08:57 PM
3

I could be wrong here... but I find it interesting that he was the only mod of this subreddit for quite a while and all of a sudden, Kanuk is too.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 08:30 PM
3

He didn't have the right to consent. Neither does a 10 year old girl. If she was caught at the time, she should have done the same jail sentence that an 18 year old male who fucked a 10 year old girl would do.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 06:09 AM
3

Yeah. As a guy who is average sized, I know my growth all came after the ages of 12 or 13. That surprises me too.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 06:07 AM
7

I've also had to make this point several times on Reddit. Who gives a FUCK!? This may come as a shock to the feminazis but this product is for male usage and male benefit. I wouldn't take this to put her at ease. If she wants birth control, now I could tell her with an unburdened conscience... "You take care of yours and I'll take care of mine." And I dated a woman who several times tried to get me to get her pregnant against my will. Soon afterwards, she got an IUD... or did she. With a product…
/r/MensRights05/05/09 05:45 AM
3

Oh I forgot the stat that mattered. 19/19 unemployed.
/r/MensRights05/05/09 02:02 AM
8

I was fired from a job years ago from a major casino corporation. There were 19 of us fired for basically nothing. When I sought to have my job restored and fight the charge against me, I was told that I couldn't come into my review board meeting with anyone. A lawyer friend later essentially told me that that was probably exculpatory. If I had shown up with a lawyer, they would not have refused him/her entry. They also would not have refused anyone the right to record the meeting even though th…
/r/MensRights05/05/09 12:57 AM
0

All of Reddit applauds your humanitarian efforts. You STILL haven't read my post history and you apparently can't read what you yourself type. So now we'll add hypocrite to your liar and troll titles.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 08:32 PM
1

I'd say we don't need posted the possible sentence a man would face for a similar crime. We know it would be more harsh. Vastly more harsh.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 08:18 PM
-1

Ohhh ... so you did all this to help me. Gee, thanks. Thanks for the revisionist history bullshit. You're a troll by your own definition and a liar as well You're clearly not clever enough to bring anything new to the table anyway. And you believe that you are? Seriously? I'm more intelligent than 99% of Reddit and frankly, I hazard a guess that you are WELL WITHIN that 99%.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 08:15 PM
-1

Well I AM argumentative and I AM aggressive. I wont apologize for aggression. I know the feminist agenda would like to brainwash men into believing that the female way is the only way. And I wasn't warned. I was banned at a user's request, no matter how the ban was justified later. pn6 has proven that MBB posts make it to the front page including ones that Saydrah posts and WBB posts get banned. There is no fairness and no equality at /Equality. And you know as well as I do, Xz, that a LOT of pe…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 08:02 PM
-1

I've got bad news for you. You ARE a feminist. That's how I perceive you. You're defending the irrational, the argumentative, the shrill shriek that seeks to drown out any other voice. That's you. If my responses to you make me a troll, then yours are much worse. So, you ARE in fact a troll. Sorry. Was that too ad hominem for you? Are only you allowed to make ad hominem attacks since that is the entire substance or lack thereof of your argument? Who would argue with a troll after all? Are you fu…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 07:48 PM
1

How can sentencing inequity NOT be a MR issue?
/r/MensRights04/05/09 07:33 PM
-1

Well at least you answered a question. Congratulations! You just rose to the top 10% or so of feminist posters. 80% of the time? That's laugh out loud ridiculous. I would say maybe 5% and that's usually at posters who have already exasperated me or are making weak arguments based on nothing. Since, according to you, we can base assumptions on nothing and we don't owe people any investigation before we label them with insulting names, I have decided that ALL the posters at /Equality are trolls an…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 07:22 PM
-1

You know NOTHING about me. Do you think the words grapefruit spoon and cunt wholly define me as a person? If that was the ONLY evidence you had to determine what I am at Reddit, then you would be justified in jumping to that erroneous conclusion. That ISN'T the only evidence that exists here at Reddit and before you cast aspersions at my character by trying to define the totality of my being with one derogatory word, you OWE me doing your homework. Now to gingerroot and Aerik, I am a troll. But …
/r/MensRights04/05/09 07:06 PM
4

I don't think ANY of those mods should be banned just for being mods over there. And I have as much cause to be angry at Saydrah as anybody. I'd especially like to speak up for Xzxzzx though. After I got banned, he didn't have to come over and explain himself. Or Saydrah. Whatever. But he did. And I unloaded on him and he stuck around until he felt we had come to an understanding. I've already seen our MRAs are more equipped to handle debate and discussion than their feminazis. Let's make sure o…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 05:51 PM
1

pn6, I know this is your subreddit but I STRONGLY disagree with banning xzxzzx, especially for as inocuous a comment as that. There's already a lot of anonymous downmods from the feminist cowards over here. I'd rather have SOMEONE over here to debate us and xzxzzx is both willing and able. And hot on the heels of my own bullshit banning, I think we should take the higher ground.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 05:14 PM
-1

How you behave defines what and who you are Um... no? I know who and what I am and what that is is an extremely intelligent and extremely complex person that I'm very proud of. Somehow, you've confused perception with reality. I came to /Equality ready to debate and found their best and brightest unwilling and unable. They then decided to start using insults and I was better at that than them to. Then, in an expression of her impotent feminist rage, gingerroot, who was verbally destroyed by me s…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 05:00 PM
0

Then why delete ANY MBB or WBB articles? What kind of arbitrary bullshit is that? The comment that gingerroot brought to Saydrah's attention wasn't even made in /Equality. How deliciously ironic. And ever since then, I get the /Equality treatment everywhere. Random downmods from cowards who wont debate me because they can't. Oh and Aerik told me a story about being raped by a guy. Does that make her a woman? Hardly. But she presented herself as a woman to me. So, in addition to dredging up the m…
/r/MensRights04/05/09 04:48 PM
1

All of that makes perfect sense. But you asked why you were getting downmodded and I guessed. You seem a little cranky.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 12:28 AM
2

I'm GUESSING, as I already stated. Go back and read RuffBrute. Does that really need interpretation or explanation?
/r/MensRights04/05/09 12:16 AM
5

It WAS a genuine question but he knew the answer. I think he was hoping to get the dullard to explain himself better so that he would possibly look slightly less stupid. NitsujTPU is an optimist. He thinks maybe RuffBrute isn't a human turd. I'm more of a pessimist. I'm not explaining myself very well. The question being asked wasn't quite what it seemed like I'd say.
/r/MensRights04/05/09 12:10 AM
8

My guess is sicgamer is being downvoted for expounding on a moronic argument. RuffBrute has an IQ of 70 or so and writes like it. Everyone understood what he was saying and disagreed with it. Then sicgamer tried to explain something that didn't need to be explained. I AM surprised that sicgamer (-2) is lower right now than RuffBrute (0).
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:53 PM
0

So, to recap... They're all for freedom of expression and evenhandedness but they'll ban me at some cunt's request. And then they delete articles showing the misandrist society we live in. Typical. Freedom of speech! (just as long as you agree with us)
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:18 PM
0

Wait a minute. Explain this to me. As you know I've already seen /Equality's hypocrisy firsthand but am I to understand correctly that they ban posts about men or women behaving badly?
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:08 PM
19

Wait, so when a woman hits a man, all it is is an insult? OK, so he insulted her back. No big deal right?
/r/MensRights03/05/09 11:00 PM
0

Who? I'm sure her boyfriends say the same thing six months later.
/r/MensRights03/05/09 07:20 PM
0

I've never seen a good comment from Mooshiga.
/r/MensRights03/05/09 06:21 PM
5

Surely, our sisters over at "Equality" will be right over here to stand in solidarity to protest with us the fact that this psychopathic bitch didn't get a 40 year prison sentence! They'll be here any second! Maybe they got hung up in traffic. It was a last second thing. (checks watch) [crickets chirp]
/r/MensRights02/05/09 08:11 AM
2

Excellent link. Thank you. Looks like a good author. As much of a cynic as I am, I am still fascinated by human psychology and relationship dynamics. I am working on my degree and one day hope to be a counselor. So the subject matter is near and dear to my heart.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 07:40 PM
1

Of all the men in the US who are in the same boat you are, i.e, a child they KNOW is theirs... 4% of them are wrong. So, in my opinion, unless the government fucked up 4+% of the time, they would do more good than harm. I don't want to argue marriage with you. In your case, it makes you happy. There is no argument that wins out over happiness. I'm happy for you and I wish you luck.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 07:34 PM
3

All my close male friends regret being married... and yet they wont get a divorce.
/r/MensRights01/05/09 05:44 AM
3

When it comes to 2 year old Eatcrapanddie Jr... Eatcrapanddie, you are NOT the father!
/r/MensRights01/05/09 05:43 AM
13

Don't get married at all. Ever. If you do get married and have any assets at all, demand a prenuptial agreement. If you have a child, automatically request a paternity test, whether you think the woman has been faithful or not. NEVER sign a birth certificate until you know that the child is yours. In some states the second you sign the birth certificate, you cannot fight paternity anymore, EVEN WITH DNA TESTS. I once saw a website that had listed for all 50 states the exact requirements to be hi…
/r/MensRights01/05/09 03:26 AM
1

Full disclosure. Are you male or female?
/r/MensRights30/04/09 11:19 PM
1

I've made this point before. "Men's Rights" is for male issues. The number of comments and upvotes would indicate to me that there are enough men who find this pertinent.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 11:18 PM
3

Some of us, like myself, bitch and complain and don't actually do anything. I am awestruck at Pierce's commitment to these issues. Kudos to him and to you as well, soapergem, for bringing that to our attention.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 10:43 PM
0

The reach of adult rule extends as far as adult visibility and vision. Once kids know they aren't being watched and they have plausible deniability, they are in charge. My guess about girls is just that a guess. There's a certain nastiness to adolescent girls that boys don't have as much. Boys might want to hurt you physically whereas a girl wants to hurt you emotionally.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 10:21 PM
0

I'm not assuming the worst. I'm embracing it. I see no reason to deny the way I am and the way others have been, at least in my perception. HUMANS are naturally violent animals, but probably especially men. You can civilize and educate all you want. Testosterone is a hormone of aggressiveness and territorial instinct. I remember the playground. I remember seventh grade gym class. It was sink or swim. I swam. Not all the boys did. Have you ever read "Lord of the Flies"? Do you think that is a fai…
/r/MensRights30/04/09 06:41 PM
2

I see your point and I wouldn't mind that as a solution when it actually exists. But you can't turn a man away because we're building your shelter now... it'll be done in a few months. Also, protecting children and protecting adult women is very different. How long does a woman think she can or should be sheltered from men at large?
/r/MensRights30/04/09 05:52 PM
2

I ADORE children. If they're younger than three, they're not so fun because they're unable to cause the carnage I like. If they're 11 or 12, they start to get that snotty adolescent attitude (and I was the worst teenager ever). But in between, I just love them. They're so fun to have around. But I've stopped telling people this in public. Because I've caught the nervous glances. I don't blame a mother for being a little nervous around ALL men. Better safe than sorry. But society at large doesn't…
/r/MensRights30/04/09 05:50 PM
2

There's exactly one way to prevent little boys from establishing a hierarchy within their peer group. Keep them 100% isolated from one another. I think that cure is worse than the disease.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 05:28 PM
1

;)
/r/MensRights30/04/09 05:25 PM
7

Do you think they specifically asked for Dora the Explorer the first time? You're absolutely right. If, not when. I take it as nearly a foregone conclusion though that there will be a when. And I hope she's ready. Because at some point, the other little boys are waiting. And the best mommy in the world can't protect her sons from them.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:33 AM
2

Well, Xz, I'll miss you too. If there were more of you and fewer Aeriks, Mooshigas, monkiheds, jpfbookworms, and ESPECIALLY gingerroots, I guess I might even swallow my pride and ask to come back. But I was already treated very badly. And this was before I deserved it. How do you think they'd like me now? See you around, buddy.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:18 AM
1

The poor bastard is compensating. And please don't ban me.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:13 AM
8

This woman sure does present her opinions as fact, without citation, based on nothing more than her say so. I hope when her boys are ready and interested, she lets them play football and watch GI Joe and buys them race cars to play with. I also hope that there's a male figure in these boys' lives because there is a lot to being a man that no woman has ever known and never will.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 03:03 AM
2

There was one post, where Aerik, a user I can't even think of without muttering profanities, much less type about without saying them here, linked to some hate-filled blog bashing men for God knows what. Stalking I think and ripping "Twilight" a book/movie written BY a woman FOR women but men are to blame because it makes stalking seem romantic. I ripped her post apart, using insults I admit but making about five valid points I knew Aerik isn't clever enough to answer but I hoped others could an…
/r/MensRights30/04/09 02:46 AM
2

I'd hazard a guess that you're hanging out with exciting women! Congratulations! But I think you'd find my experiences probably match the average male experience a little more closely.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 02:34 AM
1

No. I'm sure you have a really good point but I have no idea what it is. I recognize those all as quotes of me.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 02:30 AM
1

A guy named Titties laughs at us chauvinists. Well played, sir, well played.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 02:11 AM
3

Welcome to what I went through every single comment over in /Equality. And that was from the very get go, well before I started hurling vitriolic invectives.
/r/MensRights30/04/09 02:08 AM
2

I apologize. By "you", I meant the Equality mods. I didn't mean to blame you. I don't care to post in Equality ever again. I see no reason to unban me and I am certainly not asking for that. But I think people who accuse me of making threats should be allowed to cite that claim. And if they cannot cite that claim because posts have been removed, then it makes their claims look possible. When they are, in fact, reprehensible lies. You can easily tell the truth and make me a bad guy. There's no re…
/r/MensRights29/04/09 09:39 PM
2

I would even propose that women have it somewhat easier now. There are certain subgroups of men who either are attracted to big women fetishistically or so attracted to them for other characteristics that they ignore unhealthy body shapes. You see a certain kind of fat woman who knows she doesn't have to lose weight to get a man. That may be true of men as well but in my opinion, it's to a much lesser extent.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 09:35 PM
7

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. I DELETED NOTHING. And now I can't defend myself because you have destroyed evidence. I threatened NOONE. I did call people cunts repeatedly and I did make the "grapefruit spoon" comment. I have never denied either and I have never lied.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 09:24 PM
2

you talked about ripping out the vaginas of people there with a grapefruit spoon. I talked about scooping out the vagina of ONE ... HYPOTHETICAL person with a rusty grapefruit spoon. That isn't hyperbole. I'm not denying it. I have said before and I will reiterate... If a woman ever cut off my penis, she would die a miserable and painful death. Does that make me a sociopath or a psychopath for saying that? Maybe. But unless someone has penetrated the anonymity of Reddit to figure out my name and…
/r/MensRights29/04/09 09:19 PM
4

/eq isn't looking for a war with /mensrights and I hope you guys over here arn't trying to start one. There's only one person to blame here and that's me. Noone is trying to start a war. I'm unsure why it is important to know the specific genders of the mods. Because you proudly trumpet that you have three male mods and three female mods. What is the significance of this? And why say it at all without full disclosure? In my opinion, as I have already stated, the 3 male/3 female mods is a gimmick…
/r/MensRights29/04/09 09:12 PM
8

Not only is this a brilliant perspective, it is extremely eloquently expressed. I think the same way but I doubt I could have typed it as well, Kanuk. I forgot you on my short list of men I'D like to see moderating /Equality and I apologize. There's another poster I love here on MR whose username also starts with a K.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 08:36 PM
5

Take your time. I bear you no ill will. And I know I've seen you post somewhere before, although I can't swear it was Equality and I seriously doubt it was /MR. But you are the ONLY mod over there other than Saydrah that I have ever seen post. I just accept that the TRUE equality and fairness on Reddit will come from the equilibrium created by men in MR and women in Equality. It's too bad really. Kind of a wasted opportunity IMO...
/r/MensRights29/04/09 08:21 PM
5

I did a term paper on male body image a few years back. In a classroom with 27 women and 4 men. AIDS really started a lot of it. Gay men who weren't HIV positive wanted to look muscular, toned, and fit to project an image of health. They starting working out, especially in NYC. Calvin Klein's ad agency picked up on this and signed Mark Wahlberg (Marky Mark) to be their underwear model. That image resonated and THEN Soloflex came along. The rest is history. My beef with this whole thing is that t…
/r/MensRights29/04/09 07:46 PM
3

I can't even defend myself in "Equality" because I can't post there. I plead guilty to most of the accusations made against me. I abandoned civility, lost my composure and used insults rather than debating. I was crass, rude, and insulting. I have been accused of being a troll. Perhaps other people have other definitions of what a troll is but mine basically comes down to "A troll is there to cause trouble". That was never my intention and I take objection to being called that. I ACTED like a tr…
/r/MensRights29/04/09 07:35 PM
3

There is no 2-3 zone defense in football. Unless you're playing 2-3-6 dime, in which case it better be 3rd and 40 or I'm going to ram the ball down your throat.
/r/MensRights29/04/09 06:31 AM
2

Maybe you're right. Actually, maybe revenge will be better served by debating her where she cannot hide. You changed my mind. Kudos.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 09:36 PM
0

Couldn't agree more. I disagree with these people so badly I DO HATE them. But I would NEVER censor them, at least not in any other way than as a retaliatory measure for my own silencing. I want gingerroot banned from MR if she is even a member. Does that sound hypocritical?
/r/MensRights28/04/09 09:21 PM
1

I banned myself essentially. I can't link the conversation because I was already banned before I knew it had happened. That meant that I couldn't follow the link that gingerroot posted. I WAS using a lot of profanity. I don't blame a casual viewer for thinking I was a troll but I think Saydrah owed me AND owed the subreddit she moderates more than the clearly casual perusal she gave before autotwitching with the banstick.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 09:19 PM
0

I hadn't been a member for long. Maybe two weeks. I know I got carried away with the insults. I was rapidly losing interest in being over there anyway. I was ganged up on all the time. Noone could or would answer my questions or debate my viewpoints. I maybe could have fought the ban. I don't blame Saydrah. I blame the environment over there and users like Gingerroot who don't have the intellectual capacity to deal with opposing viewpoints. It just makes me sick that they call it "Equality". I j…
/r/MensRights28/04/09 08:33 PM
11

Please post more often. The women of Reddit could learn a thing or two from you.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 08:25 PM
-1

My detector is broken quite often and I apologize. Downmod changed to an upmod. However, in my defense, I have seen people propose that exact argument. Also, feminists often propose arguments so absurd that it creates an environment where sarcasm can be pretty tricky to spot. AND there are MANY anti-male trolls here.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 08:06 PM
12

I agree with the old chestnut that whomever asks whomever out should pay. Unfortunately, since women as a group absolutely refuse to take any dating initiative, that means we're gonna get stuck overwhelmingly anyway.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 07:59 PM
-1

Those cunts banned me over there. Saydrah suspected I was one of your alt accounts. Gingerroot was the user who cried that either I go or she was taking her ball and going home. So Saydrah looked at my last 10 posts and decided I had nothing constructive to say. I guess she missed the part where her little fan club couldn't debate with me, couldn't answer a single question put to them and instigated the insults. They just couldn't handle the fact that I'm better at insults than them as well as d…
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:49 PM
-1

Violence isn't bad because of the potential damage. It's bad because you are taking away someone else's right to not be hit. That's assuming that your overly broad generalization is true when it obviously occasionally isn't.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:46 PM
6

Men's Rights? Really?
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:39 PM
2

IF the woman is charged with filing a false police report, it would be a misdemeanor. Wow! Is there any question she DID file a false report? And then she may or may not be slapped on the wrist for trying to ruin a man's life? I sympathize with the police here but you can't expect women to stop making false accusations until we've made examples of a few of them.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 06:29 PM
3

NOW vs Rush Limbaugh? Do I have to pick sides? How about we take Rush and his moron fans and all the feminazis of NOW and let them debate this wherever the US tests nuclear warheads.
/r/MensRights28/04/09 03:04 AM
0

So your solution to massive inequities in the way society and government treat men is to work closer with women who have done nothing for us and nothing for true equality? These women are the enemy, plain and simple. And men didn't declare the war. Hate? You bet. Indiscriminate or unjustified? You haven't been paying attention. Edit for point by point - Life expectancy? If one sex outlives 5 years longer than the other and the disparity is growing, and is even more pronounced in some ethnic grou…
/r/MensRights28/04/09 01:17 AM
-1

Oh so women DO register for the draft? Men and women have the same life expectancy? Male and female health issues are equally addressed with equal funding? Men and women serve the same sentences for crimes and are equally executed in states with the death penalty? When contesting child custody, men and women are awarded the children at a rate of 50% each? Men and women are treated equally by the educational system with the same dropout percentage? The same grades? They attend institutions of hig…
/r/MensRights27/04/09 11:00 PM
-1

No. I was kicked since you, monkihed, Aerik, and especially gingerroot are incapable of debate. And I was NEVER one of you.
/r/MensRights27/04/09 10:54 PM
-4

Does that script make you a misandrist piece of shit? Tell your fellow /Equality cunts I said hello.
/r/MensRights27/04/09 09:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter