TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BhryaenDagger Archive

View 1 posts and 572 comments by BhryaenDagger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
108

news/opinion articleBhryaenDagger/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 07:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

And for her to be waxing “emotionally more intelligent” while demonstrating a sociopathic lack of empathy for the child in her own womb based on pure bigotry… Sorry, lady, but the two are mutually exclusive.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 08:55 PM
3

Works for me, but, judging by “Rings of Power” alone, they sooo want to “deconstruct” orcs into the misunderstood good guys and contrive every race-sex swap possible- among other feminisms. A world in which Aragorn is played by Ellen Page (and marries a girlboss Arwyn at the end) would be their peak “subversion” of Tolkien.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 06:52 PM
1

Clever girl...
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 09:26 AM
22

"IF NOT ALL MEN WHY ALWAYS MEN"... Curious rephrasing of the feminist trope/tripe of "Not all men, but always a man" into "Always a man, therefore all men." Yet somehow the all-caps made neither the premise nor conclusion any less false. Who'da thunk it? But maybe if she really really felt mean and angry at men about it, it would change the truth state condition? Yeah, no. But who would assert such an easily verified falsehood? IF NOT ALL FEMINISTS WHY ALWAYS FEMINISTS!?
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 04:12 AM
6

Shame for who? I consider both self-effacing to the hater since I don't have any hate that I prefer (and thus apologize for). Only a feminist would consider misandry a "lesser crime" since they'd already be contriving a "sorry not sorry" rationalization for it... even though the rationalization itself demonstrates depravity. "We should drive all the Jews into the sea!" is just as pathetic as "We should abort male babies!" But no GoT "walk of shame"- or even more scary, Greta Thunberg wagging her…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/26 03:59 AM
53

Can you imagine a similar line of logic delivered by an anti-black racist? It’s hate logic that’s perfectly logical other than the pretend “sex oppression” rationalization that’s pure make-believe. Once such a false premise for hating is established, it just becomes a matter of the hater’s capacity for hyperbole for determining just how extreme the hate logic gets. I mean, there’s already a #killallmen, so advocacy for sex-selective charity and economic relief is somewhat further back on the fem…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:55 PM
1

Associating racism w patriarchy is a false equivalency... which, mind you, is an example of "unintelligent shit." Regardless of any determination of "huge impacts", racism exists. As does misogyny and misandry. These occur when one hates another due to an aspect of the other's humanity that they were simply born with. It's a pathetic tendency, but it's quite real. The "patriarchy", on the other hand, is a far more convoluted and absurdist claim strictly by feminists about a social system that ab…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 07:13 AM
1

Well, I hope that u feminist guys grow up to face the blind and dumb contemporary political errors that you're making in the here and now reality all while you aren't suffering any "devastating and inescapable oppression" as women whatsoever- at least not in the West and other socially advanced nations. Maybe you'll then better yourself from being merely a useful idiot for those who would divide us w misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 06:35 AM
3

Nolan's not exactly being subtle about any of the messaging. The middle finger to men and Western culture generally was behind every decision in casting and source material deviation, including especially the use specifically of Homer's epic- a cornerstone of Western culture- to deliver its feminist contempt for men. It's not unique otherwise- making all men unsympathetic characters, villains, fools and jokes, disposable, contaminated by the original sin of being born male- or worse straight, wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 05:57 PM
5

I'll never see it, so I can't give any spoilers I haven't heard elsewhere. But essentially this central, bedrock story from Western culture was transformed by Nolan to remove from Odysseus his empathetic and compassionate qualities as well as his intelligence and good-naturedness- anything that could humanize him. Nolan wanted the character reduced to a feminist-constructed dull-witted "toxic" male- a walking feminist caricature of a man- and he also apparently removed a whole section of the Ody…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 05:48 AM
3

As ever feminists fail to grasp nuance. Shakespeare was a genius at giving different characters different motivations which they go on to articulate at length. This means a character will say things because it’s what they’d say at that moment in that fiction, not what Shakespeare is trying to convey… FFS… When Hamlet tells Ophelia to “get thee to a nunnery” rather than be a “breeder of sinners,” this is not Shakespeare condemning all men and advocating to women to shun men through religious celi…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/07/26 09:36 PM
21

Hell, Nolan just released one of the most iconic works of Western culture as a diatribe against men, so it’s not exactly unprecedented that “Obsession” also pushes an agenda to represent all men as “bad” or at best as neutered jokes. Naming the male protagonist “Bear” is a heavy-handed allusion to the feminist “man-or-bear”ragebait. Feminists weren’t clamoring to replace men in jobs like public sanitation or industrial maintenance. They wanted to dominate entertainment venues to do exactly what …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 08:37 PM
2

True, you entirely neglect an economic basis to your assessment. But a patriarchy would be a social system w its own economy- i.e., economics based on the exploitation and oppression of women for the exclusive enjoyment of men. And that is glaringly obviously not what's happening... Sorry not sorry
/r/EverydayMisandry20/07/26 05:59 AM
5

The "Ur dum" reaction isn't as intelligent as you seem to think... When there are products being rolled out for markets in the millions designed exclusively for women, it is stupifyingly obtuse to pretend the economy is functioning exclusively for men. Or are tampons, pregnancy tests, menstruation treatment, women's clothes, women's entertainment, etc. etc., actually for men? Don't worry, the tampons are for me, but you can have some.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/26 04:51 AM
3

You could indeed “go on and on” about social conditions of the distant past. No doubt you do regularly. Those conditions, however, don’t establish that men are not the greater recipients of social inequality today, they don’t establish the existence of a patriarchy in which men rule exclusively due to being male- neither today nor then- and they don’t establish that society was built exclusively for men. It was built almost entirely BY men, but it was built for anyone who can buy into it, male o…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/26 06:02 AM
6

That guy is genuinely utterly hilarious and worth a watch... until he starts waxing wise and knowledgeable in ways he's not... like here... He's correct about the universality of it- not Left/Right, etc- and about the "beachfront property" reference- though there are a lot of factors that would need to be clarified on what makes people "high-demand" since not all are based on sanity or reasonability. Cancer sticks used to be pretty "high-demand" also. If you know his own story you'll see he's a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 04:59 PM
7

So the feminist politician cited an incident involving a self-proclaimed misogynist- i.e., who hates women- and decides there should be greater government investment in misandry. Yeah, the best response to an isolated instance of hate is to establish national acceptance for hate and to keep anti-hate criticism policed to a minimum. You know, cuz hating men is "near and dear to her heart." But, no, the incident regarded misogyny and is thus irrelevant to anti-feminism, so that politician was just…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 04:51 AM
16

Feminists were pushing the #killallmen campaign while fronting the “let’s abort all male babies!” slogan, thinking, “But can we be even more of a part of the problem?” Selective organ donation as well… What’ll the bigots think up next… and why will it be yet another demonstration of irredeemable depravity?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 06:53 PM
48

It's an illustrative image of what feminist rationalization looks like, demonstrating it for us visually. First she pretends "the world" was built (by men) exclusively "for men", and from that false premise she then establishes her false justification for being indifferent to the suffering of men in the world. Extrapolate from this formula to her lifestyle and you have a middle class or rich sociopath enjoying the privileges of casual social media antagonism against the supposedly privileged sex…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/07/26 03:11 PM
8

So long as feminists approach the process of human empathy and emotional connection as “labor”, they only out themselves as sociopaths who only view men in their lives as something to “expend labor” to get something out of, purely transactional and only unilaterally relevant. Someone once told me that “love is the effort,” meaning it’s that noticeable, tangible tendency to do things for and w someone else, the effort that demonstrates in itself the underlying compassion for another. A feminist r…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/07/26 07:16 PM
6

That does sound like a feminist take. Name a topic, event, scene, situation, scenario- anything- and a feminist's primary goal is to make it into a way to assert "man bad." They will always be a part of the problem, not the solution. News: "The heat wave is reaching epic proportions. The death toll is historically unprecedented and it's almost as if civilization itself is under attack by nature. Authorities are urging people to take care of the vulnerable and prepare for the heat accordingly." F…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/26 04:31 PM
6

Not sure how no one is noticing the cognitive dissonance of that particular woman performing the gesture. That same gesture could be directed towards her chest… as she says, “for shits and giggles”… I could see the photo just being funny “cuz naked guy”, but such sculpture was porn in eons before cheap, widespread graphic art and cinema… and titillation about porn and nudity will always be a thing. Regarding the statue’s phallus size, I mean, lots of guys are “growers not showers”, so kinda does…
/r/MensRights05/07/26 07:54 PM
22

Anti-feminism isn’t anti-women for the simple reason that men can join into organized misandry just like women. In fact, many of the most vociferous, aggressive, and effectively damaging feminists are male. It’s like a white guy being the loudest mouth in anti-white racism. Not impressive, but they clearly think they’re getting somewhere w fellow bigots, and, like all sociopaths, are more concerned w what antagonism they can get away with than the optics of performative hate for a group to which…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:51 PM
5

It’s violently anti-gay: her conclusion was to kill him. Even if he actually were a gay guy who’d gotten into a relationship w her somehow, that’s not a death penalty offense, no? Where’s the vigilante angle? But he’s supposedly gay, so murder ok? See how it’s fundamentally bigoted vs gays? The feminists credo of “man bad” makes genuine alliances between themselves and gay guys definitively on quicksand, even to the point of advocating violence vs gays.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 06:57 PM
4

“So, what I’m hearing is that our ‘Speaking w American Men’ isn’t resonating quite as strongly w you as we intended. Please submit your suggestions to our feedback trash bi- I mean, feedback reception center. And vote Democrat in November unless you’re a patriarchal fascist!” - Democrat Committee Male Whisperer Division
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 06:57 PM
1

There’s definitely been a zeitgeist shift since the 1940s social and economic reforms, the 1960s/70s dismantling of Jim Crow and segregation, and ultimate legal institution of social equality. As you said, “conservatives” tend to orient toward a simpler standard of social measure, and that enabled them in a single generation to themselves adopt the new (at the time) anti-discrimination norm. I’ve rarely seen outright bigotry among them, largely as a matter of principle. It was a victory of Lefti…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 10:01 PM
13

Men generally are simply so exiled from the Left by feminist hostility that, if they feel they have to choose between Left or Right, thereby tend moreso to choose Right than they otherwise might have. It’s the only way that the Right has become so much more popular and Trump elected twice (notwithstanding the electoral college win that overrode popular vote loss). It’s never been a question of how brilliant Trump is or Rightwing ideology. There are simply inevitable consequences to making the an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/26 09:02 PM
6

The male feminist picked a good photo to represent himself- the corrupted Spiderman who does epic cringe victory dances and becomes the enemy he thinks he’s fighting. “Dude, I iz a bully 4 da girlz. Haha! What? No, YOU need treatment, not me! I iz mad sane, dude! I gotz lotz more ad hominem for you, dude!”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/26 10:53 PM
1

Meh- depends on the mother. She may be a single mother due to the father’s death or the father’s exclusive responsibility… or may be a nitwit who divorced the father because she “just wasn’t feeling it” or some other feminism-addled pathology. Even if the likelihood of the latter is higher, it’s technically possible that she’s sane and would be a great person to get w. I’ve got a skilled tradesman coworker who’s very happy after decades w his current wife having raised 2 kids that weren’t his ow…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:41 PM
46

Now that’s a feminist evacuation plan- making sure to provide for women but not even a thought of how yo save the men. Curious that women come first in the “women and children first” pecking order… “Please let my son on the boat!” “Nah, these boats are for women, and we go ahead of everyone, don’t we, girls?!” “But he’s only 6! Please save him.” “Another manchild to expend emotional labor for…? I’m too empathetic and emotionally mature for that!”
/r/EverydayMisandry22/06/26 08:19 PM
16

Feminist: "Most me are selfish." Agreed. Most of you are indeed. Pretty much all of you.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/06/26 10:25 PM
16

Feminist: “Men are articulating their feelings?! They’re vulnerable! That’s the best time to attack! Man tears incoming!!!” It’s the equivalent of anti-semites responding to a Holocaust memorial day by spraypainting a swastika on a synagogue or Jewish History Museum. Feminists never hesitate to register their misandry when men’s concerns are brought up, but especially when it’s the male loneliness epidemic which asks for empathy for men. “Yeah, well, men tell dick jokes, so… and I demand more re…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/26 08:35 PM
2

“⁠False accusations are at an all-time high: More men are being falsely accused of rape, abuse, and harassment than ever before.” Is there substantive evidence for this? I have no reason to gainsay it since I have no evidence myself, but it would- unfortunately- be difficult to prove. Even insultingly obvious cases of false accusation would inevitably entail a sociopath who would have no difficulty simply continuing to lie even as her case evaporates around her in court. Just wondering if any st…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 06:56 PM
8

I've learned that a lot of feminists engage in predation vs men by routinely, publicly misrepresenting them as adversaries such that labeling some as "evil" becomes irrelevant since in reality they malign all men as such. In fact, all feminists do so as a modus operendi, a raison d'etre, inherent to their political existence and divisive historical role. I mean, since we're sharing what we've learned an' all.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/26 03:37 AM
7

LOL
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/26 08:58 PM
6

This feminist attempts to gloat that women are more empathetic about men’s suicide, then proceeds to make it all about women being morally superior… you know, cuz her sociopathy- I mean, empathy kicks in like that… And then has a conclusion that “socialization follows us to our graves.” Bitch, men are in their graves. You’re still here gloating over the superiority of being less “messy”… and ineffectual. But, yes, feminists do intend to take the calloused, emotionally immature gloating to their …
/r/EverydayMisandry17/06/26 07:08 PM
21

Feminist: “Like, the world would be better off if all men just offed themselves, but, I don’t know, I guess don’t kill yourself? You’d be making the world a better place though, but whatever. Stay alive if you want- if that’s what you choose to do. Just sayin’.” Recruiter: “That’s how you’d handle a call to our center? You’re aware this is a men’s suicide crisis hotline? Is that an appropriate attitude?” Feminist: “Uh, yeah. I gotta fight the patriarchy, you know? So Imma speak my truth.” Recrui…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/06/26 08:40 PM
6

Excellent quote- never saw that before. Though it applies better to how sociopathic “causes” are “worked up,” not how “good causes” are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 08:06 PM
7

So the only reason she's not getting botox is because... botox would somehow prevent her from making mocking expressions against men while issuing infantile dick size insults? Well, at least feminism prevents needless cosmetic surgery, but as usual it's still for entirely the wrong reasons... And if she learns that most guys have bigger dicks than she thinks, does that mean she's obligated to get botox injections? The logic here from "Slug Princess" is so flounderingly incompetent as to resemble…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 08:37 PM
11

"I think misandrist thoughts... so they must be true..." Feminist Deep Thoughts
/r/EverydayMisandry13/06/26 06:31 AM
6

In two responses you’ve demonstrated not a single inkling of empathy for men or repugnance to misandry. Only anti-intellectual book fetishism and now… WW2 denial? Swingin wide for someone who just came out of a decades-long coma and is “just asking questions.”
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 09:36 PM
2

XD Yes, AI is easily inaccurate. That’s exactly what I was getting at in mentioning that it derived its stats from RAINN, a feminist organization that has a reputation for lying. AI lies because it quotes liars. You haven’t lent a single iota of credibility to the moron quoted in the OP who was lying about how many women are raped. If she’s saying it’s 370M in the US, that’s more than total population of the US. She’s a demonstrable fool and misandrist. But unlike Google AI, the moron quoted in …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 07:19 PM
7

I not only read history but lived through it. But I’m guessing you read feminist accounts of feminist history and pat yourself on the head for being literate. And what a coincidence you hint at an Israel connection. Guessing you’re a Dogzapper apologist. Thing is, anti-feminism outside the West and select nations like Israel is generally misogyny… while anti-feminism in the West/etc is primarily anti-misandry like any other anti-bigotry movement.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 06:53 PM
4

Some of the most conspicuous and obnoxious proponents of feminism are men after all. Our cause is not the man v woman dynamic that feminists actively cultivate, and ultimately the downfall of feminism will require a joint effort of men and women.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 05:47 AM
9

Gotta wonder if "womenshoulddie" or "womenshouldbeburntalive" would make it to the leaderboard...
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 06:42 AM
9

Just checked w a simple Google search on how many women in the US are raped annually... Says 400K are subjected to rape or attempted rape... which didn't exactly answer my question since it added "attempted rape" in w the rape stats, but even from that we're nowhere near the 370 million quoted... which would've been odd in the US w a total population of 343M. It's possible that she said 370M by incompetently quoting 370K... but she's not being charitable to men who don't rape and is happy to mis…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 06:39 AM
6

Suuure... Just woke from a coma after a few decades? As you do... To be brief, feminism started when social inequality was law and it at least rhetorically opposed that inequality, but then social equality became law and feminists pivoted to fighting for social inequality on behalf of Western women against Western men w a consistent core assertion of "man = bad." It's now a misandrist movement that actively works to keep people divided, especially through advocacy of sociopathy toward men, contr…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 05:20 AM
27

I’ll have to remember that- when feminists balk at a guy not buying an expensive ring for a girl, it’s automatically “and does she want a tiara and heels w that too?” Entitlement is such a self-owning deal breaker. “It’s simple. Just gimme stuff!” “I’ll do you one simpler. No.”
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 08:26 PM
3

“Don’t do that thing where we pretend that something men do is something intrinsically human to do.” How about doing that thing where we acknowledge both that child abuse is intrinsically sociopathic and that sociopathy is not specific to sex? Especially w kids against whom even women w no physical prowess to employ sociopathically can nevertheless do serious damage… and do… It’s actually one of the feminist platforms to abort boy babies, so we’re not pretending women have no power to be “intrin…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 06:56 PM
14

Nah- sexual attraction- especially before you hear a woman start spewing anti-male hate- is natural and otherwise inconsequential. The humiliation ritual would be in a man voluntarily letting a misandrist into one's personal life, particularly after having already witnessed the bigotry flag-waving. Self-debasement is all that can follow...
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 03:40 AM
2

Well, w false premises like that, no, her logic isn’t going to be particularly sound. Nope. The biological consequences of pregnancy are indeed all on the woman, but the social and economic tends to fall on the man. We wouldn’t have a call by men to have a legal means of disowning an unborn child otherwise. Or the alimony entrapment from which it derives. Human males are not a predator group. Men and women can both be dangerous to each other, but that doesn’t make either one predator/prey. Mosqu…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/06/26 07:14 PM
18

The guy is a male feminist, so... the absolute bottom-of-the-barrel-scraping strawman will do.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/06/26 06:34 AM
8

If it were up to feminists, misandry would most certainly be more "widespread and institutionally powerful" than misogyny ever was. That malevolent intent behind their campaigns is why a comparative historical measure of the damage of misandry and misogyny is irrelevant: feminists are at this historical juncture actively seeking to cultivate and exacerbate misandry regardless. And they're doing so when humanity is supposed to be exploring the potential of a society based on social equality that …
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/26 07:42 AM
3

I wouldn't doubt their expertise on the subject of "structrual discrimiation." Whatever that is, it sounds important. As much as I quote Malcolm X as well, that particular quote was made while Jim Crow was in effect- was in defiance of legal social inequality and of attitudes among whites that that law should be tolerated. To pretend that Jim Crow wasn't abolished, Civil Rights never enacted into law and enforced by the national govt, and the rule of social equality never established as the nati…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/06/26 07:29 AM
5

I refuse to give Hollywood a chance and was never an MotU fan, but from what I can gather from more critical reviews, it's definitely a departure from the usual "man bad" narrative. For ex., He-Man isn't forever upstaged by girlbosses and gets to have genuine hero moments without being made to look a fool or undercut in any way. And supposedly- according to MotU fans themselves- the lore is given appreciable homages other than typical arbitrary race-swapping. The most obvious feminist "make-over…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/26 05:42 PM
1

Medicate the delusional 1-6’s misusing the medical profession to posture as if they’re a 10, escort them to an institution where they can live in harmony w other girls who share the same delusions… The genuine 7-10s don’t do such sociopathic things or advocate them- how they’re distinguished as a 7-10…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 06:56 PM
1

Feminists are obviously using their phrase to stew resentment of men by skewing perception to one of deliberate and aggressive hostility. The current historical role of feminism is one of cultivating division between the sexes, so... But my point was that their little catch-phrase applies far more aptly and decisively to feminists themselves- given how strategic their theoretical errors and obtuseness tends to be- than it applies to men simply not cleaning the kitchen immediately when the boss- …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 05:41 PM
3

It never was an exclusively male social class after all, particularly given the institution of marriage. The world's five richest women gained their fortune through divorce settlements. Capitalism isn't in the least a patriarchy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/26 05:14 PM
10

Alas, capitalism has been actively transitioning the entertainment industry to be “anti-male gaze” despite the reality, yes, that “sex sells.” It’s a thoroughly counterintuitive development until you see how thoroughly feminism has insinuated itself into the industry and Left politics generally. Capitalists aren’t in power due to being the cream of the crop of humanity- and are regularly incompetent- and the contemporary Left is currently making blundering errors it never made before. So we have…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:33 PM
5

I’ve pointed this out repeatedly- that the female-desirous “gaze” is possessed by 2/3 of the possible sex-sexuality combos: male hetero, male bi, female bi, and lesbian- a half/half split of men/women. Only hetero women and gay guys don’t have the incompetently named “male gaze”… and gay guys likely would balk at being associated w a “female gaze”. I mean, advertisers weren’t consulting female bisexuals for what straight guys like when the phrase was coined, but it’s still inaccurate. And that i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 10:19 PM
2

Media- or rather how it’s managed- is more the symptom than the disease, the effect not the cause. And it’s only an outward show, reflecting the intentionality behind media employment, not the social reality itself. Women aren’t generally actually “fearful of men” in the West where historical lows of violent crimes prevail- even w casual “True Crime” viewership. And least of all feminists who regularly antagonize the ones they’re supposedly scared of to the point of open advocacy for aggressivel…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 09:56 PM
2

You’ve articulated very well why the feminist, anti-male use of “man up” is utterly calloused and antagonistic. So I obviously agree w your renunciation of the misappropriation. But you entirely missed my point about how “man up” gets used in a meaningful, inspiring, conspiring way. It’s a matter of context. If your mentor says, “You did great” and a snide teenage girl adds sarcastically, “Yeah, you did sooo great”… the followup is to renounce the asinine use of the same words, not the use of th…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 07:22 PM
22

The whole “weaponized incompetence” thingy seems like feminist projection to me. It’s often the feminists themselves that demonstrate most definitively this tendency that they themselves made up. From the incompetent analysis of the economy as “patriarchy” to the incompetent confusion between “most/many violent offenders are men” and “most men are violent offenders” to the incompetent assessment of wages in the UK yielding a pronouncement that “women are paid less” but for qualitatively differen…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/06/26 12:31 AM
31

Feminist: “The patriarchy put you in power, men. You’re ruling over all us women from the moment you’re born because simple penises are enough to qualify you for your appointment to rule. It’s oppression, I say!” Homeless, one-armed veteran man on the street: “What’s that you say? I’m in power over you? Sure doesn’t look that way. Not sure I can do you much oppressing, but I could use a dollar…” Feminist: “Uh, yeah. But see how patriarchy oppresses you too? That’s why you’ve got to stop oppressi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:41 PM
4

So essentially they invited confessed rapists/assaulters/etc to provide data about their behavior and motivations, found that 95.1% of that group described sociopathic behavior they’d done, and then the outtake conclusion was that 95.1% of all men are evil? Holy myopia, Batman! Bias sample fallacy FTW! Come to think of it, when I was at a Star Wars convention, I discovered that nearly 100% of humanity is a Star Wars cosplayer and enthusiast! The data was right there at the convention!
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 09:17 PM
-3

Does seem a bit irksome though that for “Men’s Month” they chose to introduce their pet misandry concept “toxic masculinity” to apply to a phrase w “man” in the title… as if “manning up” is inherently bad since “man bad”, and so men should just go be crybabies to demonstrate mature emotion. If one “mans up”, one supposedly can’t do so emotionally… I mean, “man up” isn’t exactly the most precise term to employ, but that’s sorta my point. A feminist could employ it to say, “Just be a man and pay f…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 07:21 PM
34

AI: "Male bigot query: rebuke curtly and unequivocally. Female bigot query: placate ingratiatingly and offer support. Following program." I simply want both to be equally rebuked curtly and unequivocally. Robots aren't above bias, particularly when they're programmed that way. This is how logic isn't "correctness." The AI is following its code according to the logic of prevailing human bigotry. The worst part though is that that AI programming tendency is across the board everywhere on the plane…
/r/MensRights28/05/26 05:06 PM
56

"All I said was that all men suck and all the problems of society are men's fault cuz man bad. Why would they delete comments by women innocently venting by saying men are all worthless pieces of- wait, did that guy just say women are equally capable of bigotry?? That's misogyny! Someone arrest this man! Typical evil man thing!"
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 07:28 AM
28

Yes, I can't help thinking, "If you really think being tall, straight, white, male, and attractive is such an inevitable plethora of bonuses in life, why aren't you (internally) shouting 'SCORE!!!' about your husband and counting your blessings about your son... instead of bemoaning the situation and cursing the supposed 'privileges'?" She should tell her "troubles" to an ugly black lesbian in order to "commiserate" about not being as "superior." That should go over well... Or tell it to the hom…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/05/26 04:55 AM
6

If that were the trajectory, our species would perish well before it…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 12:49 AM
4

Our treatment as disposable revolves around men's relationship w a social system oriented toward exploiting us... Not that women are necessarily above piling on, but those sociopaths that do are really only able to do so systematically.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:51 AM
3

XD Was going to be my response this time also since, yes, circles... BUT, I did want to add as a take-away that the feminist you were responding to was demonstrating exactly why abortion was lost as a national right in the US: feminists prioritize arguing "man bad" even over their own fundamental interests as women. They demonstrably would rather die on the hill of antagonizing men than protect their own reproductive autonomy.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/26 04:37 AM
1

You’re still not grasping my point… particularly as you now try to reduce MY point to “anti-abortion = men controlling women” since that’s precisely what I’ve refuted twice now… on anti-misandry terms… As to your “clarifying” the abortion “debate” political landscape, no, you’re not. THAT is my point. You haven’t stopped taking the anti-abortion stance, now reworking the arguments to make both sides “moralistic” but resorting to using romanticized tragedy as a rationalization for supporting forc…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/26 12:10 AM
16

How dare you say it’s unrealistic for them to find a minotaur that cherishes using them the way they deserve! It’s not impossible! It’s not! You just WISH you had that kinda love!
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 08:10 PM
1

As I already mentioned in my “whole lotta words”, taking the position that abortion is all about the “morality” of the abortion itself IS taking a position on the matter. Not “avoiding” it at all. And it isn’t the anti-misandry position. Far from it. Quite a different inherent implication in a position that uses reductionism to excise any awareness of any other considerations, including especially women’s and society’s welfare… There’s no need for the further thought experiment regarding cheatin…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 07:22 PM
8

Boy: "And if the girl is beating on me so bad I can hardly see? Might blind me? Has a weapon even? Then can I fight ba-?" Mommy Dearest: "NO! You will always let a woman do whatever she wants any way she likes. If you can't make it away from her without being killed, that's OK. Girls remaining unharmed is the only thing that matters, not my son's welfare." Awww, so cute...
/r/EverydayMisandry21/05/26 05:12 PM
4

Correct that the abortion issue isn’t inherently about the sexes, and its banning or legal use will dramatically impact the lives of both sexes, but the issue itself isn’t strictly one of the “morality” of abortion. It’s one of the ethical and pragmatic implications of banning it vs the supposed “moralistic” concerns about its legalization and practice. And it’s quite difficult these days to find reasonable articulation on the issue that addresses that more comprehensive understanding and scope.…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 10:29 PM
2

“Womanhood sucks ass and dick literally…” lol Thanks, OP. This was a very amusing feminist viewpoint…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 06:48 PM
1

XD Sometimes it’s just that simple. And most questions regarding feminism have that same answer.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:41 AM
19

As a late shift worker myself, can’t say I agree… But feminists aren’t known for appreciating what men do all hours of the day and night keeping the infrastructure going for them…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/05/26 01:37 AM
25

I’m not sure I want a child either- could be a girl that grows up to be a misandrist like the OP sociopath… or worse. Think of all the young boys she might sexualize and statutorily rape as a teacher, take advantage of, make false rape claims about, ruin the reputations of simply for sport. All the men whose lives she’d adversely affect in a long life of exploiting men, manipulating them for nefarious ends. And what if she’s the next Dorothea Binz or Aileen Wuornos… or even some contemporary Blo…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 07:14 PM
5

Man: “Hi, honey, I’m home!” Woman: “Hi, I wanted to tell you about an idea of mine.” Man: “Oh, what’s your idea, honey?” Woman: “The idea is that you conquer me w your dick.” Man: … Woman: “Whatcha think of my idea?” Man: “I mean, I’m OK w roleplay if you are, but I’m not sure how I could perform a ‘conquest’ w Big Joe. Any more to the idea than that?” Woman: “It’s supposed to make your peepee feel big and strong, I guess? I heard it on a sex advice channel…” Given false rape claims, entrapment …
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 01:58 AM
2

I was half-anticipating the concluding remark to be “But misandry IS just an opinion. And it’s a correct opinion cuz hating men is totes cool!” So instead the rejoinder becomes, “Yeah, thanks for the 1960s lecture. Today the lesson we need is ‘Misandry is just hate. Are we clear on this?’” Because it doesn’t appear to be clear at this historical juncture…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/05/26 08:39 PM
7

Feminism and misandry not only aren’t mutually exclusive but are actively interdependent. Misandry is the sociopathic tendency that feminism organizes, executes, enables, and amplifies. Egalitarianism and misandry, however, ARE mutually exclusive, as are egalitarianism and feminism… If you’re a bigot against a group- in this case men- then, no, you’re not going to advocate for or work toward men’s “liberation”- or in any case in men’s interests. Technically you can, but, no, the KKK isn’t workin…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/05/26 09:23 PM
47

That sort of damage is very much equivalent to the physical abuser that doesn’t leave scars. Female sociopaths tend to prefer the more sinister damage that’s less directly linkable to the sociopath. And naturally feminists (misandrist sociopaths) will seek to rationalize and/or enable the behavior of sociopathic women, so… “Women are less violent!” But not less sociopathic…
/r/MensRights14/05/26 09:54 PM
20

“Why are there STILL so few black people joining the KKK?? What are they waiting for? Maybe they’re racist…”
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/26 08:42 PM
1

The whole “fuck” (if I’m using Piker lingo correctly) about “inbred” Jews (including the Israeli working class) and advocating for the Houthis, Hezbollah, and any other terrorist organization that’s anti-Semitic (“drive the Jews into the sea” and all). He makes no distinction in his advocacy between “communist” nations (N Korea, Cuba, contemporary China, USSR), but is perfectly happy also to cheerlead for religious terrorism as well which is nowhere near Marxist in its orientation. A very open o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 10:18 PM
12

He only got on my radar as an excellent example of how pathological liars behave- in his case regarding torturing his dog. He stayed on my radar due to his attempt to portray himself as a Marxist while practicing the least complex or sophisticated political opportunism I’ve seen. Then his take on gaming came out around Pragmata sounding like an elementary school bully’s take on how he thinks them nerds oughta stay in their lane… the divisive analysis of both a feminist and a clueless “manosphere…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 07:17 PM
14

Feminism has certainly become the most effective modern-day "divide-and-conquer" method since pogroms and nationalism lost their mass appeal and moralistic luster, and it truly splits the masses right down the middle... And the greedier they get, the more economic distress ravaging the exploited majority, the more and harder they're pushing feminism...
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:14 PM
9

Tbf they're called "UN Women" not "UN Misandrists", so demonizing men or ignoring men's issues isn't otherwise a natural or reasonable next step. That said, it's like making a group, "UN Children Aged 5." The overlap w other delineable groups- as the OP pointed out regarding murdered journalists being overwhelmingly male- makes it an odd specialization to insist upon. Why not "UN Journalists" for that report- free of the need to identify only the 11% women journalists killed? Why not instead "UN…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/26 02:38 PM
2

The feminist nitwits are employing legitimate reference to sex selection- which is indeed an evolution pressure factor- but they’re failing to see how it actually applied. Men being larger wasn’t a matter of tall girls never getting picked by men for reproduction (which they habitually equate w rape)- particularly as the men would likely have wanted big, strong sons from big, strong women. Ancient artifacts tend to depict mother figures as larger-featured. But sex dimorphism is more likely envir…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/26 10:39 PM
0

Odd phrasing as “just as bad.” Like, what’s that negative outlook an answer to? General enmity vs the human race? So a feminist wades into abject cynicism about our own species in order to do a “well, akchually” misandrist riff on it? “People suck, but men suck more!” Now there’s a visionary perspective worth indulging… So am I supposed to counterargue, “Nuh uh! Womenz iz even worster than da guys!”? Leave it to a feminist to inspire humanity to be their best selves… The specifics of the cynical…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/26 09:19 PM
7

“Incel” as an insult entails, “Haha, you want sex and can’t have it…” which sounds like the taunt of an adolescent who never had sex in their lives. It’s like the Monty Python “Nudge Nudge” sketch where, after waxing sex-expert by merely shaming the shagless, the taunter ends w, “So what’s sex like?”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/26 07:08 PM
3

"Men are welcome, but they are strictly prohibited from invalidating bigotry. Joining in w bigotry is OK though."
/r/EverydayMisandry03/05/26 06:40 AM
2

It's a question of what each movement lends itself to. Contemporary feminism is an organized hatred of men- at its basis a sociopathic tendency to overturn or further erode social equality regarding men- so uncoincidentally a feminist-dominated discussion will be rife w hostility to men or to anyone positive to men. Bigotry doesn't make for friendliness. The contemporary men's movement on the other hand comes from a place of resisting the sex-based antipathy that's become endemic in society and …
/r/MensRights30/04/26 04:30 AM
11

Back in the day a "high repute" criminal had to resort to the "Twinkie defense", but nowadays you just need to "self-identify" as "eccentric." When the perpetrator is an eccentric, naturally sexual harassment is just "queer stuff." Seems a self-damning defense...
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 04:38 AM
17

Curious how all the most grotesque, sociopathic responses that feminists merely claim that men say about women being assaulted end up being exactly what feminists say about men being assaulted... openly and brazenly...
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 04:23 AM
1

Reminds me of the movie "Barfly" where the protagonist gets animosity from a stranger and gets asked about it. He says, "Misplaced aggression. They don't even know me." Sums up the general male attitude to feminist-led man-hate.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:05 PM
16

Hasan Dogzapper Piker banks (literally) on his pseudo-Marxist schtick, moronically preferring the most sanguine "solutions"- "soaking streets in red capitalist blood"- but then he regularly makes comments like this that reveal that a united front against capitalism is the furthest thing from his active agenda. Waxing beefcake school bully (or possibly snotty teenage girl) to attempt to shame gamer guys- a huge portion of the oppressed masses, mind you- as "unfuckable" is Marxist how? Where's the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 04:44 PM
5

“Women check each other all the time…” lol No. No, they do not. YouTubers like emilywking and The Dadvocate who run interference on feminist/misandrist shittubing are the exception, not the rule. And there’s overwhelmingly more misandrist shittubing, shitposting, movie-making, franchise-poisoning, etc than misogynist. Any mention of that during her rant? You’ve got to stand up to the hate!!! How can you just let the misandry go on???!! (And then they rationalize their indifference…) How can we e…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/04/26 09:56 PM
8

There’s no way of proving that in an expose, and it’s otherwise just a conspiracy theory, but the reality is that the “elites”- richie riches- do stand only to gain by the rest of us at odds w each other, particularly as the economy gets worse through their greed. Misandry and misogyny divide the masses straight down the middle, but nowadays in the West misogyny gets you million$ lawsuits and career termination while misandry goes uncountered like a social disease without an antibody, so no wond…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:04 PM
29

I avoid calling feminists a “hate group” only because they’re not exactly a group. The KKK is delineable as a hate group because they’re a full-on organization. Even when the KKK leadership is attempting to soft-pedal the hate in different contexts, the organization’s legacy is manifestly hate-based. Feminists are clearly organized and often act in mass accord, but they don’t do so through NOW or any one feminist organization. “Pro-Palestinian” anti-semites who spew hate online but are members o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 09:48 PM
20

A feminist is certainly not going to counterargue that the number of cases of such women are actually profoundly few compared to the total amount of women. That argument undermines all of their own indictments of all men for the actions of a profoundly tiny group of male sociopaths. And that rationalization for misandry- contrived from misrepresented data about male violence- is pretty much everything that contemporary feminism relies upon to justify its very existence.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 08:51 PM
18

“Back in the day” a fine, upstandin’ Southern belle lily white lady could get a ni- I mean, slavery-challenged individual- severely beaten or lynched by merely suggesting they’d been looked at lustfully by a black man. Both before and after the whole chattel slavery thingy, mind you, so the “back in the day” reference harkens to never. That degree of white girl power doesn’t exist for a group considered “NOT PEOPLE…“ as opposed to the lynched man who had no recourse whatsoever as a “not person” …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/04/26 11:00 PM
3

Agreed. The feminist use of “toxic masculinity” is as a denigration of masculinity and muddies the waters of human cooperation w idiotic bigotry. Not really a way to wield a bigot’s weapon as a humanist.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 06:57 PM
10

My thoughts as well. The very question bespeaks a misandry that should make the guy not just question whether she could ever be trusted to raise his son, but also consider that she doesn't value his interests or well-being either. Her "fear" is of the extent of her own misandrist bigotry, not of the boogeyman.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/04/26 04:45 PM
11

Reminds me of Gilda Radner’s character Emily Litella. At the end of a long rant of how evil 62 million men are she gets whispered the facts about it being page views not people, that the views aren’t of the cited material, that women are also viewers… and she just replies, “Nevermind!”
/r/EverydayMisandry20/04/26 06:57 PM
13

And here I thought the world was figuratively build for men. Nope- apparently was literally. Every one of these vids/photos of some feminist silently showing their face superimposed by a misandrist quip always look like a billboard for "This is what contemporary bigotry looks like."
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:56 AM
48

It's so fucked how feminists will witness otherwise natural human relationships between men and women and interject only to be pissy to men. These things constantly have to be explained to a feminist (or explained for those manipulated by them) since every single feminist "analysis" is ultimately merely a bad faith interpretation of men's intent. "We hate men, so we portray all social reality as ruined by men. Checkmate, men!" It's not a proof, just a bigoted tendency.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/04/26 08:24 PM
9

Yes- they’re “identifying” being born male as the pathology rather than the crimes themselves… or feminism which is the pathology behind the bias…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:10 PM
5

Video games and porn aren't "proxies" for the real thing. It's not as if prior to either there was a "rape culture" where GTA road kills and pizza deliveries were rampantly ending up in sex scenes... and thank goodness that vidja games and porn have been staving off the mayhem! The point is that it's a fictional/fantasy roleplay outlet which is thus not IRL raping and murdering, so if the concern is IRL raping and murdering, why would anyone go after video games and porn? IRL rape and murder is …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 05:27 PM
15

It's a tad like the whole "gun violence comes from vidja games" argument. If they're seeking it in porn, they're demonstratively not seeking it IRL... So naturally feminists attack porn... and vidja games...
/r/MensRights17/04/26 04:14 AM
23

25-30 million women having non-feminist orgasms???! Someone's gotta stop this!!
/r/MensRights17/04/26 04:13 AM
13

Very thorough response to a very rambling misandrist diatribe. They may not appreciate it, but I did. The insane “Nigerian Rape Festival” accusation I had to look up- referred to a single incident (not an annual tradition) where a Nigerian Fertility Festival got disrupted by about 15 guys who ended up w criminal charges- no rapes reported (since the guys were immediately apprehended). Misandrist “points” rely heavily (and consistently) on hyperbole and exaggeration like a hysteric, but when “man…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 11:49 PM
9

Technically women are equally “potential predators” since the potential knows only the bounds of physics. Anyone can rape, and even a spry old lady w a gun can make such demands. But also all men are potential awesome dudes, great guys to meet and be friends with. The potential for ill or good as a human being is there in all people, and until you know better, you don’t know either way or where on the continuum each individual lies. Speaking only of “potential” crimes overlooks the potential ben…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 01:14 AM
28

Yes, and we need whites-only gyms so that racist whites can work out w a greater “sense of ease” than when blacks are present. Bigotry requires greater understanding and sensitivity… and indulgence. Or- hear me out- we could make gyms conform to social equality and anti-discrimination and thus require the misandrist bigots to leave or drop the hate instead. Gosh, which approach to prefer? Nothing as “inclusive” as feminist “man-banishing”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/04/26 11:56 PM
24

Meh, it’s not all women that have that “view”, but the feminist behavior model definitely slots men into an exploitative role. I saw a Reddit post recently mentioning a “woman-only” island that’s been pretending at being “man-free” since the mid-2010s… hilariously said “not a single guy… except for maintenance…” So, an “all-girl” island except when it needs to actually operate and be sustainable… but other than that! So, yeah, same feminist operating principle of being “pro-women” by being compl…
/r/MensRights15/04/26 11:36 PM
13

A matriarchy is no more “in our nature” than capitalism. It’s just that capitalism has managed to exploit the species’ social tendencies effectively enough to produce modern complex technological society… while matriarchy organized primitive groups of 10-20 nomads to protect children and childbirth… against friendly neighborhood Nature that used to routinely wipe out pockets of our species hundreds of thousands of yrs ago… well before the invention and adoption of cellphones and interwebz could …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/26 09:05 PM
58

But she was showing her face up in the camera while being dumb (and misandrist), so… it’s dumb, misandrist, AND conspicuously so.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 06:45 PM
29

“Anecdote bad, so ignore the data… and thereby rationalize misandrist slander.” - Feminist
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 06:54 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/EverydayMisandry05/04/26 06:03 PM
10

That’s an important distinction. I do oppose feminism but not as a mere “reaction.” There’s a better way- egalitarianism, genuine social science, humanism- that makes feminist misandry not merely a less effective means but rather an outright obstacle to progress. So opposition to it is a natural step. Similarly if you’re a man or simply support men or men’s interests, you’re immediately at odds w feminist misandry and thus compelled to opposition. And to do male advocacy without opposing feminis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/04/26 10:13 PM
0

It was the same cancel culture intensive environment. That was my point.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 11:57 PM
0

Bill Maher lost his job over it at the time. It wasn’t exactly a govt-critical environment that the Chicks waded into. I just didn’t know that they themselves had already waded into misandrist territory prior.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:20 PM
2

I swear the right-side photo seems to show the woman somewhat annoyed- not because of unloading injustice but because some idiot is taking her photo. Photographer: “See??! Men making women do all the work!” Woman: “Can you please get off my property and stop harassing us?!” Photographer: “I’m documenting this for you and all women in order to fight the patriarchy!” Woman: “And if you make me have to put down all this luggage just to call 911 on you, you better start running…”
/r/EverydayMisandry01/04/26 07:17 PM
1

The two lyrics don’t negate each other at all. He’s admitting he wanted it, but he laments it and is going to suffer for it regardless- hence both lyrics apply. I discovered while researching it that the song is part of a genre called “murder ballads” which is centuries old and involves the same theme: a murder depicted in the lyrics in the context of the suffering and tragedy that it caused. There’s nothing celebratory about it whatsoever. It’s not a goal post shift on my part to see the differ…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:14 PM
1

Speaking about what’s “hard being male” shouldn’t be brought up “when women are trying to talk about oppression…”? The thing is, what’s “hard being male” and what “oppression women are talking about” very well may be the same thing or have the same cause. The example provided of a stockbroker (a presumably successful one) lecturing about his/her difficulties in life- “So hard these days reserving the table I want at the finest restaurants!” will be equally illustrative for working class men as f…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 11:18 PM
1

Yes, the song skips over the part where he violated a restraining order to commit a violent crime but didn’t immediately end up in jail for it. XD Maybe she didn’t tell the cops about it in order to do her vigilante murder instead.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:50 PM
5

Tbh I only knew them for what seemed a courageous stance against the Iraq War when it was insanely isolating to even hint you didn’t “support the troops”- ie, support them being sent to kill/die. Now my estimation of the Chicks is more of disgust.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:47 PM
3

Lol This example is better than your other stretch w Taylor Swift, but still not equivalent to the Dixie Chicks one at all. It’s written as from “inside four cold walls”- imprisoned for the murder… rather than happily getting away w it. Big difference. “Lord have mercy on my soul…” The murder was tragic rather than a happy woman-killing song like the Dixie Chicks sang. The band Steeldrivers is also relatively obscure bluegrass (cool sound though), and the song apparently ironically only became p…
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:29 PM
3

lol The best example you come up w is a Taylor Swift song- ie, a woman singer accusing a man once again. There’s a Tracy Chapman song “Behind the Wall” and plenty of others like it that are also women singing about Boogeyman Bad as the antagonist but aren’t in any way the counter-equivalent of the Dixie Chicks song. A genuine counter-example would be a song sung by a male singer/group about killing his wife/gf and celebrating it. Try Jimi Hendrix “Hey Joe” and Neil Young “Down by the River…” bot…
/r/MensRights31/03/26 10:12 PM
3

The OP brings up a very conspicuous case of double-standards and bias regarding men’s interests (while you’re not providing a counter-example)- by a well-known performer group that’s not exactly free of controversy, so... shrug If you don’t like the post, you don’t have to be a reactive snowflake about it. Take your own advice and just move on… or are you the one offended by “everything”?
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:56 PM
6

So it’s ok to murder your wife/gf if she beats you enough to “deserve” it? She’d just be “reaping what she sows” to lose her life for punching you… right? Fair? What could go wrong w that interpretation of justice…?
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:46 PM
39

The featured woman also doesn’t look: Unhappy In a melodramatic fit over it Like she’s struggling w the load Physically stressed where someone should step in (like in a cast or wheelchair) For that couple it appears a normal, unremarkable experience of unloading the car. For a feminist it’s yet another finger-wagging indictment incident requiring the Patriarchy Police to step in and shame a man on the spot for public display of woman oppression.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 08:34 PM
1

But there aren’t any notable women-owned house construction or petrochemical processing companies to compete w male-owned ones unlike w simple period tracking app creators where feminists can insist on buying “woman-owned”… even if the woman selling the app is against feminism (or the app is crap)… So that’s why we get to hear the griping on this rather than that. Low-effort sales pitch. You didn’t mention that abortion providing doctors are also about 1/3 men… which actually puts feminists on t…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 09:55 PM
2

The face of feminism changed when social equality became the law of the land and discrimination vs everyone except straights, whites, and men became a prosecutable offense. At that point declaring oneself in favor of equal rights was as underwhelming as declaring support for keeping shoplifting illegal: it’s a social struggle that’s manifestly already been won… at least for women. So feminism lost nearly its entire schtick and had an identity crisis and became the anti-man griping tendency it is…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 09:24 PM
7

Feminist: "This shirt is about so much more than just men shutting up! It's about the endless litany of 'man bad' formulations that us feminists will cook up in our hate campaign to pretend that 'shut up' is an appropriate response to half the human species..." No. The shirt's message is literally and only telling men to "shut up." That's the statement and all the relevant context. It's antagonism vs men. The entire hate message (and intention) is right there in one unqualified anti-male stateme…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 05:52 PM
13

But accurate. Generalization is only onerous when erroneous.
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:25 PM
33

Exactly. Some 1920s anti-black racist might say, “Well, I ain’t gonna go so far as ta burn a cross on one o’ dem Negros’ lawns, but I ain’t lettin’ o’ ‘em move inna my neighborhood neither!” See??? Bigots aren’t all the same!! Though they are all bigots… As are contemporary feminists whose bigotry is manifest in their rhetoric and behavior…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 10:11 PM
15

The fundamental difference between men’s rights advocates and feminists is that the former is addressing existing discrimination and bigotry in the law for the purpose of (re-)implementing social equality that is presently undermined while the latter seeks to undermine social equality by pushing the discrimination and bigotry. They’re not just dissimilar examples but actually outright diametrically opposed over the matter of social equality itself. So the two you cite are absolutely not the “exa…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:57 PM
14

Misleading way to formulate it. It’s not “men generalizing.” It’s in part men w self-respect responding naturally to feminist bigotry and antagonism. But it’s also simply people (women AND men) observing feminist behavior and responding naturally to bigotry. It’s what feminism very demonstratively and conspicuously involves and entails, not how “man bad” is unfair to the friendly neighborhood misandrist. Genuine criticism of contemporary feminism is bound to reflect what contemporary feminism is…
/r/MensRights27/03/26 09:49 PM
7

I do regularly wonder how much of the misandry I see is due to pure “useful idiocy” by feminists and how much is only there to intentionally stoke feminist misandry and/or create a false sense/narrative of its pervasiveness. It’s impossible to know, but some portion simply has to be given the nature of hate campaigns and sociopathy generally. The global capitalist economy has been getting worse steadily since the 1970s, and by now we’ve got Western nations in what appears insurmountable debt wit…
/r/MensRights26/03/26 10:13 PM
11

Feminist analyst: “We surveyed the results and since everything we found was simply asserting the fact of ‘man bad’, we couldn’t any hate speech.” /shrug
/r/MensRights26/03/26 06:55 PM
0

Declaring feminists non-misandrist cannot divorce the two. Regardless of "legitimacy", feminists are the world's most organized practitioners of misandry, and as such they endeavor ever to erode and subvert social equality to a condition of discrimination against men. At this point they're the leading experts at it.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 09:33 AM
7

Alas misandry has everything to do w feminism. It's the only and fundamental purpose of feminism at this historical juncture... other than being a means of income for many exploiting the cultivation of misandry. And plenty of feminists- male or female- don't "claim" to be misandrists- even denying the title- while demonstratively being it. Misandry is inextricable from feminism- its defining feature. You'll find no more thorough misandrist than a stalwart feminist in the age of social equality.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/03/26 09:23 AM
1

lol "Research shows..." That shouldn't make me laugh, but given the prevalence of such "research" across reddit- see r/science or r/skeptic- I simply feel no obligation to consider it seriously. That said, "women can be heterosexual" wasn't my point anyway, so...
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/26 05:54 PM
1

I'm not convinced you'd get uniformity on the "women have it worse" tendency- and it certainly wasn't always the prevailing credo throughout history- but even granting it, how would such uniformity have been disseminated across each of those populations you cite? Randomly? Really? Sort of like nationalism just happens in a vacuum? No one knows how Brazilians tend to be the biggest supporters of Brazil- stochastic marvel of the world... The notion of "women have it worse" was disseminated in an o…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 05:48 PM
1

Misandry doesn't require to be organized, no. Hate can come and go within individuals given their tendencies or experiences. But feminism is the active decision to MAKE it organized and take it further than that. Note that OP's question involved teaching feminism, not teaching misandry. It just happens that teaching feminism involves the promulgating the organized version of the hate and the tactics it uses in society.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 05:14 PM
41

This sociopathy appears to emerge from feminists, but the targeting is heavily anti-short rather than anti-men- albeit that "short" is relative given that these bigots might consider <6'5 as short if they're that "triggered" by height. But the tendency toward genocide of men is thoroughly feminist... More notable is that the troll posted it to #nothatespeech, #notahater, and #kind...
/r/EverydayMisandry25/03/26 05:07 PM
32

Feminism is organized misandry. It has exactly the same need to be taught in schools as does anti-semitism and white supremacy.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 06:08 AM
1

I'm not a Leftist (or Rightist) as a Marxist. It's antithetical to be a cheerleader for either capitalist tendency while genuinely advocating for a revolutionary social system that removes capitalism entirely, so I don't even associate the Left w socialism. The Left has historically represented Reformist Capitalism while the Right has been Apologist Capitalism, but the Left has been deforming over the last couple decades to something more akin to a cringe-laden anachronism given that capitalists…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 05:57 AM
1

I shouldn't be surprised, but somehow I thought feminism's legacy was a thoroughly Western problem, but it appears endemic globally everywhere except the most backward nations where feminism actually has a purpose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/26 04:03 AM
10

“There's something in our world that makes men [and women] lose their heads. They couldn't be fair if they tried…” - Atticus Finch Nowadays the “something” is feminism, Attaboy, but, yes, even today white women “lose their heads” over them strappin’ black bucks- and make false rape claims... So imagine when white womenfolk were the slave masters… Poor, oppressed white women slave masters- I awful sorra, ma’am- “slave mistress”.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 11:15 PM
3

Unfortunately, yes, it's logical... and certainly for a feminist. If the conclusion is "man bad", feminist logic supports it. Just as w the statement, "It's rainy today, so men suck." Again a very feminist logic employed... As is, "Cases of men raping happen, so all men are rapists" or "Women are doing better in college than men these days, so men r stoopid"... or "I hate men, so man bad." Logic is not equivalent to accuracy. After all, psychology studies a logical process that often tends irrat…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 04:02 PM
2

Sociological vulnerabilities/ blind spots where scrutiny and vigilance are weak are exactly what get exploited by sociopaths- in this case pathological liars who are women. “Believe all women” is the credo of sociopathic women seeking to get away w something against men (petty revenge for rejection, monetary compensation for pretend crimes, etc) that natural skepticism and fairness would otherwise prevent. Why would idiotic credulity ever be the solution to prosecuting rape cases (or any crime)?…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 09:22 PM
5

“I just think whites are a superior race to blacks. That’s the complete opposite to white supremacism!” No, in fact, that’s the textbook definition…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/26 06:56 PM
2

“A few randos.” lol Literally made me lol As Christopher Hitchens replied to critics who tried to counterargue that “extremists don’t define the religion,” I don’t even have to point out the ravings of the extremists when the actual texts, statements, and policies of feminist authorities and organizations- or entities like the UN that’s heavily influenced by feminism- already actively and sufficiently demonstrate the misandrist tendency. Enough that one has willfully obtuse not to recognize it. …
/r/MensRights23/03/26 06:51 PM
4

I suspect the feminist is using more recent stats from US wars in which, yes, troop casualties have been lowered significantly using modern tech that no longer requires trench warfare and such. Plus we haven’t had a world war in a century. The stat comparison during the US Civil War or WW1 & 2 will immediately dwarf the domestic homicide rate. And always and ever feminists stake their misandry on a fear campaign requiring amplification of the representation of a tiny fraction of men who even do …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/03/26 07:33 AM
3

The difference between feminists is historical not a current diversity. Until social equality became law and thoroughly implemented, feminists were indeed espousing social equality as a political objective- albeit that they weren’t the only political group doing so. The labor movement did far more than feminists for that goal. And the goal was achieved. Supporting equal rights is now no longer a distant hope: it’s a matter of simply respecting the law. And feminists are currently actively underm…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 07:19 AM
3

As much as I want to support the sentiment, there's a critical fallacy in "Misogynists hate women because they [the hated] are women." I used to get annoyed any time I'd see those contrived scenes in movies/shows/ads in which a white racist does something idiotic to black people and a black child then turns to their parent to ask, "Why do they do that?", and the parent responds, "It's because we're black." It's just incensingly, needlessly wrong-headed. I want then step into the scene and say, "…
/r/MensRights22/03/26 03:09 PM
46

If she had gotten up there and said, “Thanks for this award. And btw blacks need to be chastised. Just ridicule black people any chance you get, amiright??” would you understand why immediately rescinding her award would be an appropriate response? But people somehow couldn’t care less- or cheer it on- when it’s directed vs men. The desensitization to bigoted hostility to men is an epidemic.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 05:39 PM
56

I was just about to say the same. XD Essentially she asserts: “Ever notice how women are genocidal against men and could totally do away with the man-things- poof, gone, hahaha, who needs em, amiright?… while men actually like women and like having them around [despite the genocidal tendencies of feminists]?” It’s cuz we’re in a misogynist patriarchy, you see… That’s how it works… (Let the Olympic Mental Gymnastics commence!)
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 04:53 PM
11

You can always tell the “radical” feminist when they claim men and women are “radically opposite sexes.” Biology is a battleground between gametes at war, new recruits w every impossible combination of radically opposite gametes that produce another member of the sex army. I joined the Radically Male Organization at birth cuz I was just sooo male… and cuz no one can possibly be casually male or female… to a feminist…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/03/26 11:27 AM
12

The issue is never that women are invading “male spaces”. Girl gamers, for example, are an inevitability and often a very welcome addition. The issue is when FEMINISTS invade “male spaces” because they don’t come to join in. They come to disrupt, antagonize, and otherwise neutralize what they consider enemy territory. And it’s not “feminists and trolls” doing the damage. It’s feminists… who are trolls toward men.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:07 PM
3

Exactly. Otherwise we could sue the Papacy.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:00 PM
6

It was great seeing the actual mother/wife responding. Usually feminists spew their misandry to an echo chamber or an audience unprepared to counter it or tolerant, so the contrast w the ecstatic mother/wife reactions was demonstrating how out-of-place- downright antithetical- misandry really is in human relationships generally but specifically here in intimate moments between parents of an infant. Mostly though feminists simply reject appreciation of men out-of-hand: the "bare minimum" wasn't a…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/03/26 05:32 PM
1

You’re half-right: the ruling class pits BOTH men AND women against EACH OTHER. “Dog-eat-dog competition” is the social standard, and it isn’t sex-specific. It’s not just men pitted against women cuz “man bad” and “women victim.” The rest of us cooperate despite that standard, and we make out better as a species for the defiance, but that’s the social chaos we’re dumped into systematically, not “git dem girlz!” The modus operendi of any class system- incl capitalism, the actual social system in …
/r/MensRights17/03/26 10:26 PM
2

I don’t have to imagine what would happen. I’ve been banned by Reddit twice, both times in this sub merely (and mockingly) reformulating misandrist violence w its “complement”. The fact that I was deliberately disparaging the violence was completely lost on Reddit’s mods. Or they just crack down regardless. The background photo far more aptly pairs w the caption: “This is what a female sociopath who condones bigoted violence looks like…” except that it’s unclear as always if the misandrist is fe…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 10:41 PM
4

That women hold positions of power IN ITSELF contradicts the patriarchal status of a social system. A patriarchy would put men in control over women at every available juncture- systematically. If a woman rises to power AT ALL, it’s not a patriarchy- by definition and by practice- demonstratively. If a single woman merely avoids oppression as a member of her sex, the social system isn’t patriarchy. Patriarchy would REQUIRE women to be a systematically subjugated sex in order to exist, would exis…
/r/MensRights16/03/26 10:24 PM
14

“Men have openly hated and oppressed women for centuries…” Feminists routinely conflate the use of “men” as “the subset of a delineated set of people who happen to be men” w the use of “men” to mean “the entire set of men”. The latter can be accurate- as in “men die at a younger age on average than women”. While the former can be accurately used, it’s technically not the most precise use. When feminists conflate the two in the above statement, they’re asserting, “Men as a sex have been openly ha…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 09:52 PM
26

"Next on r/science... Scientific research study decisively shows men are just jerks and should be called 'moids.' Now that's sciencing!" Three subreddits that I would naturally be joining in w regularly- r/science, r/skeptic, and r/atheism- are all plagued by feminist bigotry and end up not worth indulging.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 04:43 AM
20

My contempt for feminists comes their demonstrable contempt for men… It’s simply natural repugnance to bigotry. But I get the point that not being contemptible oneself does make feminist contempt that much more glaringly obvious. Despite that their sociopathy is largely tolerated in society, they do make themselves the rotten egg of whatever group they’re in. The stereotype of “that uncle” at the party w his controversial opinions has been eclipsed in frequency by “that aunt” and her obnoxious m…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:28 PM
31

Is that one of the new slogans coming out of the Democrats’ Speaking w American Men project? “Hi, men! Let’s talk! Why are you pathetic?” Now that’s negotiation skills!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/26 08:55 PM
9

To be so willing and eager to tell stories… and make men the villain in all of them… I’d just get bored after a while, but it’s apparently their “thing.”
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 06:57 PM
3

I mean, they already invented the purely misandrist slur “moid”, but a feminist sociopath never stops looking for ways to bigot.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 10:51 PM
32

Feminist: “You see, if I simply recontextualize my bigoted hatred, it’s OK.” But I don’t get how a feminist contrived that rationalization w the sense that it somehow exonerates them… much less elucidates. It reads more as an indictment of feminism by acknowledging that: 1., yes, they’re a hate tendency 2., they don’t view men as “PEOPLE” but instead as a thing… which is textbook bigotry… 3., they erroneously conflate a biological reality (sex) w a social one (system creation)… and even that’s a…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 03:10 AM
5

Feminism at best is reformist, so even w addled concepts of patriarchy and analysis of oppression way out of perspective w the reality, it could and did provide some limited measure of redress. The civil rights activism against Jim Crow in the US was similarly limited in its scope but nevertheless managed to effect meaningful corrections of social pathology regardless of any errors in the political orientation of the Civil Rights movement. They didn’t need a Marxist analysis to say “Jim Crow bad…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 10:33 PM
3

The comparison of feminism’s decline w that of misrepresentations of Marxism is completely fallacious. Feminism had one legit job: remove discrimination vs women… which incidentally is also a Marxist mandate (where such discrimination occurs). And humanists also incorporate ending discrimination vs women, etc- all to achieve the goal of social equality among everyone. Feminists have always suffered- like any interest group- the risk of pure self-interest at the expense of others. So when social …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/26 02:34 AM
31

XD And on all counts except the few of those that are the usual feminist oops forgot that most men only got to vote shortly before women (in the US), the land ownership discrimination claim has been debunked repeatedly, and the restrictions of women from education are long since over. The important distinction left out is that the women are indeed doing all those sociopathic things against men are overwhelmingly feminists. Superimposed over the girl’s face it’s like a poster that has the caption…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/26 01:24 AM
6

That’s one of the OGs of the contemporary feminist tendency- ie, misandry as modus operendi. She earned the name Elevator Girl for me (similar to how Doordash Girl got her nickname) for how in the early 2010s she forged a rep off of antagonizing men in the atheist and skeptic movements. Sociopaths like her discovered that they could monetize people’s reactions to their hate and ignorance, and though she’s back to obscurity decades later, she’s still sustaining the same pretentiously-delivered sc…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 09:22 PM
20

“Men are, like, totally our oppressors. Literally. Like, OMG. Like a dystopian hellhole, amiright?! Almost spilled my latte…” declared the self-appointed representative of the oppressed majority (from her seat at the Starbucks booth).
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 12:40 AM
64

“And now you want ONE WHOLE HOUR to ‘decompress’ after work!??! More like oppress! When I had to waste time dealing w the brats??!! The unfairness of it all!!!”
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 10:07 PM
40

“Not every man, not every marriage, but… [gonna misandry anyway]…” As an “artist” she does have a knack for portraying women as fashion dolts… a giant pink diaper in one cartoon but in this one a woman who can’t even button her shirt… which is dissonant enough, but then you recognize that she’s trying to make the argument that women who wear expensive and/or absurd fashion are the type to be toiling to scrub clean the guest room shower (cue the “all we owe” dwarven miner theme). And a “death gla…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 10:00 PM
2

Let's be real- men and whites did "just give up" privileges and advantages "all for the sake of 'mere equality.'" The zeitgeist shift toward social equality was thoroughly cooperative, and it was in everyone's interests. But, yes, feminists think like the bigots of old and indeed have no intention of surrendering the ill-gotten gains against men that they knew were ill-gotten gains when they got them. The hatred we see from them is mostly only the rationalization they use for their greed, a conf…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:50 AM
2

“You don’t think women being hateful towards men is gonna make insecure men more misogynistic?” Nope. Right in the first few comments is a man actually calling the hate “low-key fire”. So it’s not women that are deserving the ire of men through misandrist sloganeering. It’s feminists. And feminists deserve all the hate they dish out. Maybe make a shirt saying “I support a feminist’s right to shut the fuck up” (in ALL-CAPS) and we’d see a genuine 1-to-1 response to the misandrist version. Respond…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 09:56 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/26 07:54 PM
2

So that’s what arbitrary mortal fear about men looks like? She just looks she farted and hopes no one noticed… Same same…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/26 07:51 PM
13

Feminists push the "decentering" agenda not to keep the "women's liberation" (?) struggle pure and holy, but only to be hostile to men. It's the most obvious declaration of intent to push sex segregation and circle their wagons because it has no other effect. If "women's liberation" or "women's oppression" in the contemporary political milieu were a genuine concern, feminists wouldn't be formulating rationalizations for antagonizing men but would be actively seeking men's participation in the pr…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/02/26 07:03 PM
17

“Males aren’t and never will be actual allies to women. Male feminists are the most dangerous of all.” lol… As a male who outright opposes feminism, this feminist ends up considering me “less dangerous” to women than the feminist men beside whom she would be actively disparaging men. Feminists demand compliance w feminism but respect men who comply far less than those who don’t… “Play our man-hating game, dammit! And be considered suspect for playing!” After all only those inducted into the femi…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 11:58 PM
1

It’s the deceptively naive feminist position, the KKK member who argues- despite the sociopathy flowing around them- that the movement is about white folks just celebrating their own diversity and having a couple concerns. “As a feminist I would be more than happy to discuss [advocacy for men’s interests]…” No, as a humanist one might give a damn about discrimination against either men or women. As an empathetic individual, one might. As a politically honest person, one might. But as a feminist …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/02/26 09:57 PM
10

Let's face it: you came to this sub to troll, not to educate, not to learn, and certainly not to empathize. Your own "purpose" in the exchange was only your "football game" antagonism. To have addressed the topic honestly would've required an entirely different (non-hostile) intention here...
/r/MensRights15/02/26 01:56 AM
21

Now that you mention Doordash... "I'M THE VICTIM!" But, no, "spikes" aren't the indicator, and misandrist violence tends to be suggestive, passive aggressive (manipulating men vs men), and concealed behind eons of men not complaining if hurt by a woman. Dead men also don't complain, as this bf didn't. I'd ask if you'd keep a "deal" to be honest yourself, but I won't bother.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 03:59 PM
32

Looks like she left out the preface to her statement: "Because I hate men already and talk shit about them regularly, this Epstein shit is really making me..." More comprehensible now. The "logic" of feminism.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 06:35 AM
39

Stories like these are just small examples of the reality feminists actively ignore while demonizing and dehumanizing men and, as you demonstrate here, labeling any who point out the reality as "incels". Why are such examples such a personal loss and affront for you? Somehow you ended up trading barbs like in a game of football. For that woman's bf it was no game: it was death.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 06:27 AM
81

Uh huh, 6 million pieces of evidence for misandry... but why are you wearing a giant pink diaper w an oversized belt?
/r/EverydayMisandry14/02/26 06:13 AM
6

Sure is a scary story about men. Fortunately it’s just fiction. I had the same experience when I saw “Alien” the first time. Must be worse w horror fiction that goes on in a feminist’s head nonstop. If they’re not just composing the fiction to rationalize more man-hate…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 03:54 AM
22

There was a post on r/everydaymisandry some months ago w a comment from a feminist asking her fellow misandrists, “What’s the most effective put-down that can be made to a man to upset him?” The most prevalent of answers were suggestions to mock the guy’s height… which, mind you, is an anti-shortness attack, not anti-men (particularly given that men are on average significantly taller than women). Alas, AOC did join the ranks of feminist nitwits who- in plain stupidity or vitriolic blindness due…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 10:47 PM
3

When these types discuss violence and introduce “male ego,” “remove men,” and absurdly false stats like “men are worse by a factor of 10”, and painting completely unsubstantiated scenarios of male complicity in it, any good faith assumptions I could’ve maintained about their purported concern about “the problem” then dissolve. Feminism reads like rationalization for bigoted hate because it simply never demonstrates anything else.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/26 10:15 PM
9

Awesome rejoinder, hadn't even thought of that! Yes, cancer sticks are known to prowl about the woods and alleys preying on unsuspecting women passersby. Who will protect the women from these natural predators!?? Maybe Smokey the Bear.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/26 06:17 AM
6

I like that: "it's not all men... who do the hardest, dirtiest, most dangerous jobs that keep society going... but it's always a man." XD
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/26 06:09 AM
22

The use of an image of a child casually smoking while lounging back in a patio chair to voice supposed mortal fear of men is kinda fitting for a feminist image. Misandrists know perfectly well that men aren’t threatening them, but in their lives of relative comfort they make childish sport of playfully ruminating as if in mortal danger by the laziest possible “logic.” Also feminists encourage smoking by children… XD
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/26 07:57 PM
1

I've worked in various factories my entire adult life and am almost your age- usually w at least some portion of production being women (and certainly the office)- and never encountered that, but I'm not going to naysay what I haven't personally experienced. One woman where I work now was flirting w lots of guys but picking who could kiss her, and one dumbass guy decided he wanted to kiss her despite not being one of her chosen- ended up getting a new "no kissing" rule enacted, but that was the …
/r/MensRights10/02/26 06:06 AM
14

“Many of us agree w most of this post.” XD Now that’s a decisive declaration. No, I agree w most, only take umbrage w the first line: “we are not your enemy.” For as long and as cruel as feminists have been targeting men, no, we are clearly their declared enemy. We were born the “wrong” sex for them. And it’s not a matter of men making a peace offering to a group that hates us. Their hatred is in itself the primary problem, the main reason for the rift between men and women these days. If they s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/26 11:03 PM
1

If the logic is supposedly to genocide all men in order to remove 99% of rapists, then why not just kill everyone to get rid of 100% of rapists? Doesn’t she care about stopping rape altogether??!! After all, the actual portion of men who’ve committed rape is quite minuscule to be killing all men in order to “fix” it, so genociding men kills 99.00X% of men who don’t rape. But feminists don’t see that disproportion as significant. Therefore, since the portion of women who rape is also overwhelming…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 10:41 PM
1

I only recognize the utter depravity of feminists as feminists because the “feminist” banner is what flies high over it. What sociopaths call themselves is ultimately irrelevant and subject to change- as is the term “feminist” which at least wasn’t initially/historically a mere hate movement as it is today.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/26 07:57 PM
1

What sort of place did you work, if you don’t mind me asking? Also is that an official stat or your estimate of men’s “poor behavior”?
/r/MensRights09/02/26 07:50 PM
13

Exactly XD Feminist 1: “I prefer killing men for Rule #612: ‘male glances over for a moment showing attraction.’” Feminist 2: “Hm. Then what about that new Rule #3153? ‘Male doesn’t show any attraction at all.’ Doesn’t that contradict #612?” Feminist 1: “Not at all. The Rules exist not to lay down some limiting ethics but to have an established rationale for any and every man-killing opportunity. #612 and #3153 simply cover both contingencies. When it comes down to it, there’s never a bad Rule t…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 02:58 PM
8

As Colonel Kurtz would say, “The horror…”
/r/EverydayMisandry08/02/26 02:40 PM
5

Sociopaths gonna sociopath.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:38 AM
1

The very statement of "Men are the bourgeoisie" is what it looks like when feminism sublimates Marxism to its misandry.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:34 AM
5

My last “allegedly” was entirely facetious: their demonstrative malevolence toward men knows no depravity limit other than what they can get away with, and like most sociopaths they’re always testing that limit.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/02/26 03:11 AM
0

There’s nothing Marxist in feminist misandry or obtuse pretenses about a patriarchy. Feminist “theory” does- when it’s not merely man-hating- contrive a terminological conflation w Marxism, but the biological sexes are not a class in Marxism, so the “man class” that Sommers mentions is simply an insult to everyone’s intelligence. Feminists simply don’t care to use the terms correctly any more than any other halfwit that half-asses their “understanding” of Marxism. So Sommers is correct that the …
/r/MensRights06/02/26 10:02 PM
36

“‘Allegedly’ only works for men being accused of crimes apparently.” I mean, it was a premeditated execution murder she performed, so… not alleged. She pled guilty. And his status as rapist is not confirmed, so… only alleged. Calling things by their right names. She (Chelsea Perkins) was the one who arranged for them to meet as well. But any murder of a man by a woman is going to get kudos from feminists anyway… allegedly…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/26 08:17 PM
3

Some people look for solutions to a problem. Feminists prefer to BE the problem.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/26 10:32 PM
9

Thing is, misogyny jokes always have the punchline: “women are such a joke” or “women are inferior.” Misandry’s “humor” has a punchline of “men should be killed.” And in this case, “kill men, plus cannibalism.” It’s a curious disparity. I’ve never seen a misogynistic slogan of KillAllWomen, not even when misogyny was more commonplace. At the very least we’re now seeing how feminists are conceiving their genocidal tendencies brought to fruition- ie, not by passive aggressively getting men to kill…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/26 02:42 AM
4

Not sure how much of this crap has to be made explicit for their status as a hate movement to be addressed, much less merely acknowledged. You’d think the next priority for US feminists would be regaining national abortion legalization, but instead their top priority is determining ways to kill off males and cheering each other on as they do. “No, no, feminism is all about equality between the sexes… after men are removed from the equation… cuz womynz is more equal…”
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/26 12:12 AM
4

It’s simply clear that feminism is no longer anything about women getting ahead, much less women’s interests. That’s why the damage done to women under their “leadership” isn’t precluded, and why it won’t be bringing social equality (back from where they sabotaged it) as it further divides men and women. Feminism is a hate movement that references women’s interests only to rationalize its misandry. Though obviously feminists do seek to further their own careers off it. Not every sociopathic tend…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 08:10 PM
5

Feminists do subvert Marxist theory where they can (as they subvert ANYthing they can) to turn it into an indictment of or insult to men… even at the expense of a correct analysis of social conditions under capitalism (as if that would ever be their primary goal). That they would interpose the term of “man class” is such a stupefyingly erroneous conflation as to dismiss them out of hand. Are we to call Elon Musk an evil capitalist but not Diane Hendricks who sports a purported $22.3 billion stan…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/26 01:58 AM
-3

I don’t recall the internet ever being a “male” space, albeit that after Al Gore invented it in the 1990s it had little opportunity to be a sex-based tool. You could find all kinds of things- was sorta the appeal- and one of those things was “male space” options, more or less as described. But that was just because it was truly wide open at the time and not regulated, managed, or “hosted” like today where there can swift and heavy consequences for acting out “in” the internet. Like the DoorDash …
/r/MensRights02/02/26 10:12 PM
3

Now that we've seen all the poor application of special interest politics in the contemporary era, it's more critical these days to trend uncompromisingly to egalitarian, universal, unifying interests- humanitarianism, secularism, etc... Social equality was already won as a standard in by the late 1900s- a massive historical precedent that was truly the realization of the goal. Not a realization of utopia, but the eradication of all legal discrimination and the adoption by both Left and Right of…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 06:18 PM
2

I recall a letter I got from NOW (National Organization for Women) that literally advocated voting for women regardless of party... as the solution. Cuz girlz get it done! That was decades before the elections of Kristi Noem, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert, or even Sarah Palin, so I wonder if they put out the same recommendation today... As to patriarchy, it's malarkey. The concept doesn't correspond to the reality in any way when Melania Trump steps into her limo wearing a shirt saying …
/r/MensRights28/01/26 05:32 PM
1

Feminists grotesquely frame the question as "How can you oppose us merely constantly talking shyte about men while you commit violence against us?" Not only is the reality that their talking shyte about men is far more insidious and widespread than they acknowledge- spanning nearly the entire entertainment and education industries (and anywhere affected by DEI)- so that the men's experience in the contemporary mainstream milieu is one of denigration and rejection- but also men's actual statistic…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 12:46 AM
2

For sure, if a woman intends on bringing to birth a child gestating inside her, that should be her choice. That's not necessarily the legal reality- particularly nowadays and speaking geopolicially (given that women's access to abortion is contested/denied throughout the less developed part of the world)- but it's certainly how it ought to be on grounds of the reasonability of the risk of pregnancy to the mother's life. But the male parent of the child for sure shouldn't be required to shoulder …
/r/MensRights27/01/26 11:52 PM
1

Simplest answer is also 100% accurate: sexist bigotry. Slightly more complicated: contemporary feminism is misandrist in its orientation and tendencies, and the entertainment industry has become overwhelmingly feminist. But why is that bigotry so prevalent in entertainment? Well, feminists weren't going to push to massively displace men in jobs like public sanitation, dangerous tradeswork, the military, etc. They also weren't going to massively displace men in more demanding disciplines like sci…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 05:15 PM
10

Gillette's CEO stood amidst the massive financial failure of the "toxic masculinity" ad campaign (i.e., "masculinity = toxic") and actually stated, "Worth it." A company selling a product specifically for males and yet hell-bent on deriding men. So, yes, consumer rejection can work and is really our most effective means since in that "fight" we can win decisively by simply, peaceably, and passively not spending money. But companies that are already so toxic as to indulge in misandry aren't going…
/r/MensRights27/01/26 03:59 PM
2

Note that I wasn't saying misandry is a myth or that men aren't being killed. I was saying: Hatred doesn't in itself kill. Sociopaths aren't always violent, and sociopathy isn't always acted upon. It truly is a case of "Guns don't people. People kill people." At most hate can be shown to be a motivating factor, but in the end the sociopath who contributes to #killallmen is responsible for their own misandrist actions, not the hate. Misandry didn't force them to do it. You can't police hate, and …
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 05:19 PM
2

Can say from bitter experience that that is 100% epic failure to "clock" the reality. You will be the exception to the bigot's rule until you're not, and at that point a sociopath who rationalizes any and every damage they do to "your kind" now has intimate access to your life/livelihood. See a man-hating red flag? Act on it. Only a feminist would advocate that men cooperate in their own undoing. They're certainly not going to advocate to women to stay w a misogynist (much less any man).
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 04:37 PM
4

Well, that puts Kathleen Kennedy's "The Force Is Female" in a different context...
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:30 PM
13

The "misogyny kills, misandry doesn't" slogan is deliberately obtuse. Neither kill: the hate itself is only hate, and it doesn't even need to be articulated much less acted upon. This is why discrimination and bigotry stand out as the offenses against humanity when they are actually articulated and acted upon, not the hate. Even proving a hate crime as such isn't always so simple: ultimately a violent crime is just a violent crime. And in the statistics of fatal crimes men suffer far more than w…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 05:51 PM
7

A black man asking the KKK to offer an opinion about his mixed-race relationship w a Southern Belle... w predictable results: they'll contrive anything to spite a man. Multiple feminists outright rationalized their misandry by saying, "Whelp, a man asked the internet, so looks like meat's back on the menu, girlz!" The main theme is presumptuousness given that a lot of context isn't known, but aspects that seem obvious are: He's probably already talked w his wife extensively before leaving, so th…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/26 04:36 PM
2

I genuinely didn't know. The worst I've heard was the 4B "movement" in S Korea. I recently saw vids of random Japanese women asked questions on the street- seemed like they were passing the "man or bear" question promisingly well. "Feminism? What's that? Is it about women being more feminine?"
/r/MensRights24/01/26 05:27 PM
2

Please tell me this isn't happening in India... Let feminist errors just stay an overwhelmingly Western problem and not spread the social disease across the planet...
/r/MensRights24/01/26 06:05 AM
3

It comes across like Mother Theresa’s “care” for the poor. Her organization would offer some medicine and food, but she already had a “philosophy” that the poor were “closer to god” through suffering, so she didn’t offer so very much... while taking in hefty donations… If I’m ever desperate for protection from a crazy ex, maybe I’d accept their help (depending on what it actually is), but when my supposed protectors are pretending that we live in a man-dominated, man-ruined world in which men ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/01/26 10:44 PM
14

“Can’t even enjoy some damn manga without this feminist freak out shit,” said the majority of men enjoying manga.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/26 10:12 PM
2

Feminism isn’t an academic movement, so it’s not like academics represent it. It’s a political movement, so you’ll see it represented in its politics- its activist goals, its rhetoric, its policy and law advocacy. Academics are just an intellectual wing at most… and, as you pointed out, academic feminists are the biggest practitioners of the “weaponized incompetence” they invented a word for. Part of that weaponized incompetence is in half-assed academic “research” and non-scientific (even anti-…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 01:11 AM
5

Anyone who genuinely wants to end rape entirely will avoid maligning and antagonizing half the population as part of the solution. So long as feminists insist on misandry, they overtly declare that they couldn’t care less about rape victims- male or female- and are essentially throwing such victims under the bus to fuel their misandry campaign.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/26 07:56 PM
3

Branding a group as “evil” that’s constituted merely by having been naturally born that way… is bigotry. Nothing ideological to it, just pure sociopathy. The ideology then follows the bigotry as a rationalization.
/r/MensRights19/01/26 07:55 PM
5

Yes- not sure why a feminist would think that the natural equivalence between feminist misandry bigotry and racism/national chauvinism bigotry makes the feminist look reasonable... Guess they're so used to "men bad, therefore misandry good" by now that the cognitive dissonance of inadvertently advocating an anti-immigrant stance doesn't rattle them out of the willful obtuseness... After all, even lumping themselves in w people who hate immigrants still supports the sociopath credo of "I hate, th…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/26 03:52 AM
6

How are men supposed to “shame harder” on male rapists anyway? Somehow she knows we’re not shaming them enough, so clearly she has data she’s referring to regarding the overall rate of rapist-shaming by men. She must have bought a Mabeline XX67 Shamometer Pro to get such precise stats on that.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 07:54 PM
4

Yes- feminism is essentially just trolling men. Every caution one would have about debating trolls applies. As the saying goes, “Don’t play chess w a pigeon. The pigeon just knocks the pieces off, shits on the board, and declares victory.”
/r/MensRights15/01/26 07:55 PM
26

Yes, when Ana Navarro said, “Men are useless” on the “The View”, I used my great male privilege to coerce an apology and retraction from her because my power… Wait… No, she got away w that bigotry entirely and continues to get a quarter mil per yr doing so… And it is apparently a privilege to endure it…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 11:07 PM
18

Young man: “This generalization of men is demoralizing to the youth. Can it please stop?” Feminists: “I recognize that generalizing all men is inaccurate, unfair, arising from hyperbole and sociopathy rather than maturity or even righteousness, and essentially a practice of carpet bombing innocent people out of spite for an unspecified minority… but I hate men, so you’ll just have to live w the collateral damage of our collective misandry. Do self-sacrifice for women and we may or may not wish d…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 10:52 PM
11

Tbh I get a similar kick out of seeing ruin come to feminists. Not to women- ie, people who simply were born a thing- but to feminists who are so committed to the man-hating schtick as to casually post on social media their misandry and coffin emoji ill intent toward men- ie, toward people who also simply were born a thing. Doesn’t make me happy though- something that only befits a sociopath, getting glee off bigoted schadenfeude. Karma doesn’t exist, but it’s nice when bad things happen to bad …
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/26 10:09 PM
2

My rejoinder on the systematic nature of misandry was to distinguish it from sociopathy that exists entirely against either the social system itself or the system’s preferred bigotry. The “social equality” standard was a systemic reform that was adopted temporarily (and never completely), but decades later it’s been thoroughly and widely overwritten by this new misandrist bigotry precedent, and it remains entrenched.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/26 02:43 PM
2

But the expression just says “serious David Cross,” not “letchy pedo guy.” That’s my point. The meme is all about a supposedly telling look for which the feminist framing it chose a simple and expression that any man might have. If it’s supposed to evoke a “you go, girl” feminist reaction of misandrist high fiving, it’s unclear why. Not to mention that Cross is a Leftist man who’s never been accused of any sex crimes, so again: why would a feminist throw him in particular under the bus… other th…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/26 02:30 PM
6

Not sure why they think comedian David Cross is the best example to throw under the bus for a misandrist snipe at male teachers, but he’s male, so I guess it counts?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/26 03:35 AM
5

No- regular comments get low-effort flippancy. Nuance gets “patriarchy and imperialism [are my excuse for hating straight white men]!”
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/26 07:54 PM
5

“Patriarchy” is the broad interpretive brush of a misandrist who insists on painting all those human beings that happened to be born male into one group to be maligned.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 03:44 AM
27

The issues involved in men’s interests- the institutional and widespread discrimination against men, the prevalence of misandry, the intensity of men’s struggle in society- are only getting more significant as the economy worsens, so it’s not as if men’s rights are becoming less historically poignant, particularly working men’s. Feminism has succeeded to some degree in constructing a veritable sex-based Jim Crow which makes for the whole “interesting times” experience for men… but as the saying …
/r/MensRights09/01/26 09:40 PM
2

This applies only insofar as the economic conditions don't weigh in. "Dog-eat-dog" remains (and will always remain) the "standard" of capitalism- not in the least "zero sum"- so a competitive framework ends up being inevitable... and the rich have been squeezing the rest of us, so... Feminist women insist on joining the workforce over the "evil oppression" of motherhood and home life- and that's OK- but they discover that getting jobs (and especially today in a dwindling employment pool) means i…
/r/MensRights09/01/26 06:17 PM
13

It’s systemic due to how it manifests. Corporations employ it in their HR “training”, public education employs it in classrooms, entertainment employs it through DEI and bigoted “messaging,” the law employs it in how sentencing is administered and how cases are handled when men and women’s claims conflict. The statistical and policy reality of a systemically-entrenched misandry is thoroughly recognizable at this point. Man-hating is socially established enough that feminists pave careers from mi…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/26 11:18 PM
1

The ultimate interests of both men and women are in unity and collaboration, so the divisive politics of feminism are against the grain of social stability. At some point reality kicks in one way or another, so you just stay prepped to make the most of the inevitable course correction. Meanwhile the financial endorsements of feminism are being quietly rescinded as an unnecessary and largely unprofitable expense…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 10:53 PM
23

“And next they’ll be saying we’re misandrist just cuz we hate men. What’s the world coming to?”
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/26 10:39 PM
32

The caption is a feminist fantasy, not an observation. It’s the expression of their wish that men would suicide themselves over feminist hate of men… which is just another demonstration of their hate… and further demonstration of why it’s against men’s interests to indulge feminist tendencies at all.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/26 07:48 PM
1

The article is good, but Galloway's approach is anathema to men simply because it's postulating a prescriptive masculinity. The advantage to social equality was that masculinity no longer had to be a decisively delineated role, and thus men (and women) could simply explore better what it means to be a human being in wider society. Not how it turned out under capitalism- predictably enough- but that remains the genuine advantage. So a Galloway stepping in to "explain" what it "means" to be a man …
/r/MensRights07/01/26 05:15 PM
5

There's a financial incentive behind the dehumanization... for women. It assists as their rationalization for taking the lower effort, higher paying jobs via DEI discrimination vs men: "men bad" makes it seem warranted. It's not just the crime statistics. It's anything whatsoever that seems to paint men as deserving ill treatment. The more credulous the feminist is, the more of a salve is the misandry. Essentially it's like the dehumanization of whatever enemy you're fighting- calling the German…
/r/MensRights05/01/26 06:37 AM
7

It's hard to follow the "argument" being presented. "I'm ignorant of women's violence against men. Therefore, it's unreasonable to expect me to oppose misandry." It's a non-sequitur. She's "supposed to" oppose any hate regardless, so the severity of any given instance of hate violence doesn't negate the imperative to oppose hate demonstrated against others. It's a pathetic "standard" to "care" only for the one group that seems [to her] to win the Oppression Olympics. And her ignorance isn't the …
/r/EverydayMisandry03/01/26 06:36 AM
1

Well, we know how the people in charge of the Precog program handled it... XD
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 12:34 PM
1

All misandry is technically "low hanging fruit." As is the tripe of anti-semites and racists. But feminists assert it, so I see no reason not to ruminate on it here briefly. After all the OP tried to say the "crazy exes" reference was on point when there's no reason to assume that at all, and you yourself have continued now repeatedly to rationalize for the position of castigating a man regardless of his actual experience. The hypothetical guy w multiple crazy exes could be posited as a hypothet…
/r/EverydayMisandry01/01/26 03:07 AM
2

I agree, but w the caveat that in the contemporary West it's men- particularly straight white men- that are being discriminated against. As much as the claims of sex-based oppression were ever correct for women, it made political sense to organize in their own interests against the institutional and social reality that sustained it. The goal of social equality in that regard, however, was reached as much as that goal will ever be reached under capitalism. So everything they've done for women's "…
/r/MensRights31/12/25 12:29 PM
15

Curious “wry observation” about female hyenas getting extra testosterone though. For them the testosterone elevation simply entails a zesty existence of being “revved up” and “born to fight.” For male rams and humans the testosterone is somehow a deadly pathology that justifies wryly committing the atrocity of mass compulsory removal from society and consciousness to remove a decade of men’s already shorter lives. And here I thought being a man meant being “revved up” and “born to fight” as thou…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 12:14 AM
3

I don’t think “not all men but always a man” is a logical position. Either it’s a feminist who’s exaggerating the utterly small portion of men who commit sex crimes in order to imply “all men”… and thus “always a man” becomes irrelevant. Or it’s someone who’s insisting on the statistics in which, yes, it’s obviously not all men- it’s a negligible portion of men- but also it’s not always men, so the impact of women on those numbers gets as accurately represented as possible. That is, it tends to …
/r/MensRights30/12/25 01:27 PM
6

Just did my own Google search. That spread of supposed sex offenders across LA looked overwhelming. “Look at em all!!!” Maybe 200 in the all-too-brief glance the idiot provided? Whatever. LA has about 2 million men. That’s… so low a percentage of total men as to beg the question of why anyone other than a misandrist would indict the entire sex of men over it.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 06:17 PM
1

There is a more reasonable feminism… in the past. Contemporary feminism is well past the expiration date of the “save the womenz from sex oppression!” mission. When feminism deprioritized abortion and then prioritized “manspreading,” “mansplaining,” and “mankeeping” as the great evils- unironically championing “microaggressions,” they’d already gone off script. “Decentering men” is the campaign of a hate group. And that “failed feminism” is the prevalent version across “the internet,” workplaces…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 06:05 PM
1

"Good" and "feminism" are very awkward in combination these days. It's similar to the religious defending their holy books despite awkwardly explicit genocide advocacy within. Or wanting to oppose anti-white discrimination by awkwardly joining the KKK. Contemporary feminism is so thoroughly misandrist that, even if people weren't looking for a more humanist or socially comprehensive political solution before, the "you go, girl" tendency is nevertheless now an inextricable part of the problem aki…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 05:33 AM
2

I sense the presence of a strawman... framing a dialog between a casual-dressed, "average Joe" working class guy and a smug, affluent, overdressed feminist. It's a bit of speaking at cross-purposes since the guy just answers honestly from clearly not having though much about the oddly-phrased question, and the feminist just regurgitates a favorite feminist misandry rationalization regarding violence and harassment that most women never experience. But the "conclusion" doesn't give the feminist t…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 01:44 AM
4

Many men have been injured putting up and taking down Xmas roof decorations... Not so many women...
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 12:56 AM
3

"And for this holiday occasion- just like every occasion- let us take a moment to stoke hatred between men and women just like we stoke the stocking-adorned fireplace coals. Let's be merry!" And they say family get-togethers are soured by opinionated old men. It's demonstratively more likely that it will be soured by feminists of all ages... Not that I require "holiday magic" anyway, but the "domestic labor" phrasing pretends women are in indentured servitude or slavery rather than what we in th…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 12:53 AM
8

"Finally misandrists are speaking out! Just the articulation of hate I've been wanting all my life!" And, no, misandrists "put numbers next to it" constantly because it enables them to pretend they're in the slightest objective. The worst thing a man can do relationshipwise is marry a feminist. The best thing men and women can do is beat the statistics by not hating each other despite the constant hate-mongering of feminists... which is clearly a struggle given that "professionals" are professin…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/25 11:58 PM
22

So much feminist “math” in that “boy math.” Hiding height/age/weight/etc is common among both women and men in blind dating/dating agency profiles. The example provided only demonstrates the usual superficial obsession w absurdist male height requirements… and quibbles about 5’10 v 6’? That whopping 2” difference of heights remains well above the average female height, whereas obese women claiming/pretending to be 50lbs lighter is a bit more weighty an example… Feminist math. Same issue as #1 w …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 10:51 PM
14

Carpenter’s public regurgitation of unequivocally misandrist rhetoric is, yes, disgusting and the hallmark of an asshole… whether she makes billions off it or no. If someone else points out that sociopathy can be profitable, they’re just stating a reality, but that knowledge in no way ameliorates the sociopathy.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 01:27 PM
3

It’s a bit like “feeling offended.” Tends to be.a “you problem,” not something I can help with.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:26 PM
7

It’s like the fundamentalists- who from the 70s to 90s were railing against games as Satanic- then synthesized w the feminists who dominated from the 2010s until now, producing a combined “fundamentalist feminist.” Thinking about it, I can’t see a definitive contradiction between the two groups except in the rationalization methodology- one moralizing from religion, the other moralizing from misandry. Both have the same goals, so moralizing from misandrist religion is in no way precluded.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 10:46 PM
25

One citation (of many) to show how misandry is not just “women saying mean things” but a thoroughly entrenched institutionalization of apologism for antagonism to men and white knighting for women.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/25 01:39 AM
2

True- missed that she states that premise flat out in the first sentence: "The only thing men (collectively) are better at than women is physical strength (which makes them the class made for doing physical labor)." So her very first move is to rationalize the subverting of the sex-based category of men into a social class for exploitation. Capitalists use different rationalizations for their exploitation, but both lead to the same place. Essentially she's just expressing her contentment w whate…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/25 05:18 AM
8

It's not entirely "weird." JP's initial arguments for free speech were mostly laudable and garnered him a lot of support at the time, so on that ground his efforts were worth citing. Then he started talking about religion and global warming and pretty much any other topic, and at that point his lack of genuine expertise was demonstrated thoroughly. Except for this feminist who deemed the opinion of a random psychology professor on human IQ more valuable than the actual studies and findings of in…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 06:53 PM
9

The articulating of biological advantages for one group of humans v another does sound exactly like the pseudoscience of antisemitic and anti-black "theory". And just like the infamous "bell curve theory" and Douglas Murray's "science" on race, it begs the question of: "Why contrive such 'results' in the first place?" At least Murray then rationalized that it's about allocating national resources according to "different needs"- which translates into depriving some populations of national resourc…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 06:31 PM
16

There's a good recent post on r/TheTinMen about the whys/wherefores of the age gap between the sexes (though it doesn't touch meaningfully on the class distinction): https://www.reddit.com/r/TheTinMen/comments/1ph8x3h/the_artificial_minority/ According to that report men are born slightly more often than women as well but not-so-mysteriously are notably less populous than women at old age. According to this OP chart though, women live like the rich to be living just as long at the 10% income lev…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:50 AM
14

Could title it "Misandrist projection." It's essentially a strawman of both women (who generally never say things like "men are so special and unique" or that they "could never live without them" (though the latter is literally true)) and men (who have no universal "strict animal categories" to hate women with). It's a contrast not between women and men but between mythically ingratiating women who utterly appreciate men (the ultimate nemesis of feminists) vs the way feminists themselves view me…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 05:24 AM
23

I was just about to say this- that it's pure projection on the misandrist's part. Men are considered pets, labor, and sex/disposable for them, so they simply project their own tendencies on men to rationalize treating men as such. That's just how a misandrist "be like."
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 05:06 AM
3

WTF even is a “thought leader”? Apparently we like them so long as they’re not women, but I don’t recall ever looking for a leader for my thoughts of any kind. A TED talk speaker? Politician? Philosopher? As a casually delivered phrase to describe some supposedly essential role, it begs the question of what sort of milieu feminists exist in that employs “thought leaders.” “Well, I was considering the implications of what a wise man was saying, but the esteemed Feminist Thought Leader assured me …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 09:22 PM
1

It would be the fallacy if either position were an official position of men as a group… but men are far more diverse than two asinine extremes. Instead they’re the most salient positions of feminism regarding men and yet do very much fit together despite being in themselves contradictory. The overriding tendency of feminism is one of talking shyte against men, so both count… even though they can’t simultaneously be true. The logic behind the illogic…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 08:28 PM
1

It’s totally anti-goombaism, and we should have Reddit ban any mention of the fallacy XD
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 08:23 PM
3

What even is “patriarchy theory”? The presumption that men are inheriting power through the genetic predisposition to produce the small gametes? It’s nonsensical. Feminists assert “patriarchy” more as hyperbole than as a theory: “Men! Pfft. Amiright??” Yes, excellent theory. It becomes a trivial matter to “counterargue” (against flippancy?) that poverty affects both sexes, wealth affects both sexes, and while poverty is a social state lacking power, wealthiness is a state of wielding power. Gwyn…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 01:25 AM
1

Where you’re missing the Marxist analysis is clear in making a false equivalence between religion and feminism. Women’s interests are a material reality while God is a particularly counterproductive make-believe. So the former is not an “opiate of the masses” while the latter is. Feminism’s historical impact- and it’s woven in and out of numerous historical contexts in numerous ways- is not necessarily as a political distraction because women’s interests (or the presumption of them) aren’t a pol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/25 12:04 AM
2

Not so much “class first” as “class ultimately” or “fundamentally economic”. Political tendencies like feminism simply aren’t what Engels called the “ultimately determining factor,” but he did mention that they can play a decisive role in class struggle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 11:26 PM
2

Really like the response… except the “on feminism” part that asserts that feminists have specific “class interests as an economic group.” They’re a political tendency, not an economic group or class, that’s economically and socially variegated but ultimately serves capitalist interests. You can have working class feminists next to, say, Brie Larson. The politics are shared: that of reforming or deforming capitalism in the nominal- not necessarily actual- interests of women. It was reform when it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/25 11:09 PM
27

As usual feminists err when trying to speak “for women.” Men don’t like misandry, so it will be difficult to tolerate- not just “be interested” in- a feminist. Hating us does make feminist women a bane to avoid. But women in general don’t experience that because the context of antagonism and adversarialism isn’t there.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/12/25 02:21 AM
7

I don't fear a matriarchy any more than I fear a patriarchy, a Big Bad Wolf, or Hell. Contrivances of fiction are intended to frighten children... or at the very least the immature... A world run by an ever-decreasing pool of the super-rich combined w global warming and mass unemployment from AI, however, is a very real existential threat to the species and ought to invoke at least a modicum of concern. But a matriarchy? lol Not even on the list... Feminists have already demonstrated, however, j…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/25 06:48 PM
3

It's a common tendency of hate groups to- instead of being a brilliant example of a group (in this case the "Most Woman, hear me roar")- instead become a population of self-limited nitwits basing their "identity" on being an irrational "not-this..." which ultimately is just a group denying/suppressing aspects of their own humanity on some ground in a mockably unsuccessful attempt to spite a different group. So, yes, to be a "not-man," one has to think about men a lot more in order to attempt to …
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 05:43 PM
7

To antagonize men. There's no way they're actually avoiding men, so the point is simply to be an ass.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 05:26 PM
4

Brilliant advice from feminists who care about women: "And if you're just about to walk into traffic and a guy shouts, 'LOOK OUT!', completely ignore him like he's not there. He's just exploiting the situation to get attention. Or if you're being pulled out of a car wreck by male paramedics, don't listen to their instructions to save your life. Those men are just trying to center themselves in your life, those patriarchs..." Also if feminists have matters to discuss about needed plumbing, electr…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 05:25 PM
2

I did say "IIRC"... But looking it up (Google makes this relatively easy), I did "RC" somewhat, albeit that the origin was even further back than when I first heard it, possibly what you're referring to. Apparently it started w someone named Alana who used the term without reference to the sex of the person and was intending its use to be one of concern, compassion, understanding. News to me. Later (when I first heard of it) it was coopted by the men who used the term as a term of hostility as i…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 11:38 PM
1

There are drug-addled nutcases- or even outright child abusers- of both sexes who would feel "bad" not being given custody. My point was that it's irrelevant- even counterproductive- to determine whether a male or female parent suffers more based on their sex. The current clear bias of the judicial system toward the female parent will end when the approach is no longer sex-based, just based on making sure the best arrangement w the specific individual parents is determined- i.e., calculating for…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 11:11 PM
2

The "root" of social exploitation is economic, not sex or gender based, so I wouldn't argue that either sex is the ultimately determining factor in the specifically sex-based suffering of the other. I'm also not a fan of the Oppression Olympics, so I see no useful or even constructive purpose in assessing which sex fares better or worse- especially since context is lacking. In war? Men obviously fare worse. In reproductive health and autonomy? Obviously women face the greater concerns. Does it m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 05:39 PM
5

Yes, IIRC the term incel was originally self-imposed by men as if belonging to an organization, and there was an explicit tenet of self-declared incels that sexual/romantic partners should be provided for them by the government. It was absurd on the face of it, so- however large the tendency ever was- the mockery of incels was entirely a deserved response (though not necessarily proportional). Nowadays the term is almost entirely imposed by others to either mock men who can't or aren't getting l…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 01:35 PM
35

The trashing of male characters is rampant across the full span of entertainment industry writing. I just saw the 2022 film "Ambulance"- purely an action movie- that still managed to pull the same asinine shenanigans where men- particularly straight white men- are all portrayed as fools, jokes, and evil w cruel fates while the two women in the entire movie outshine all the men w girlbossing and unassailable virtue. Entertainment writers these days seem to know no other theme to deliver. I mentio…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 05:31 AM
7

XD “Man-whisperer” lol “No, no, trust me. I’ve listened to loads of Jordan Peterson, so I know all about what makes the man people tick.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/12/25 11:02 PM
12

Or cut it off the baby and suck the blood out w one's mouth like the rabbis do in NYC. Naw, not a barbaric procedure in the least...
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 07:12 PM
8

Yes- it's the difference between "ew, gross" and abhorrence combined w indignation. One doesn't typically use the term "gross" for the latter unless they equate the two in severity. That a feminist would deliberately conflate the two evokes something closer to the latter. It's essentially trivializing the rape of women in an attempt to disparage men. That said, when I hear of any crime case, my first response nowadays is... "Is it true though? How much is true? What actually happened and what pa…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 07:06 PM
8

I really want to agree since it's so unusual for a feminist to get an analysis correct in any way other than by accident. Yes, war is enacted by a ruling class, not women as a sex- though there are wars started by a ruling class which are also arguably in the interests of the exploited class (like overthrowing fascism or slavery (WW2 and the US Civil War)). But although wars aren't started by women as a sex, they're also not started by men as a sex: they're ONLY started by the rich (or previousl…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/12/25 02:36 PM
15

The only genuine natural predator of humans (male and female) is the mosquito- evolved just to hunt our species in particular (though some mosquito species evolved to hunt other animals). Other predators may hunt us, but it's outside their evolutionary target species. Speaking of men as mosquitos is just typical feminist bigotry no less than Hutus calling Tutsis cockroaches. Men evolved to perform the cooperative reproductive role we naturally perform alongside women for the survival/success of …
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 05:05 PM
6

Alas, a lot of feminists are men- adult or otherwise- but, yes, the maturity level of a bigot is notoriously low.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 04:35 PM
1

Isn't that neat that she gave the scenario of standing up to the German fascist autocracy "a lot of thought lately"? Been on her mind for a minute. The thing about her "simple yet crucial conclusion" is that it's entirely based on misandry, not reality... and comes across like shooting her mouth off rather than "a lot of thought." Fascism- which is by no means wed to the German nationality (neither historically nor systemically)- isn't a product of male sexism or "patriarchy" or else women would…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/25 04:53 AM
3

Average = average. Meanwhile arbitrary disparagement = arbitrary disparagement and arbitrary glazing = arbitrary glazing. Any opportunity a feminist gets to be adversarial w men = opportunity taken.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/25 03:28 AM
3

Yes- the feminists posture as if they're "sticking it to the men" for some power-crazed assumption of a maleness mantle, but possessing XY, a dick, and the small gametes- all due to random meiosis during parental conception- is a very basic reality of human reproduction no one gets to even choose much less assert as an accomplishment (or failure). But feminists still assert maleness as a sort of affront to women despite that, nope, I just work here...
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 09:00 PM
1

So many nitwit presumptions in a single sentence... Misogyny can be practiced by women, so, no, misandry wouldn't follow logically in that case- and thus by that exception it doesn't follow logically in ANY case. Hatred of women is not only not exclusive to men, it's not even close to being the general tendency among men. So hating men has no direct correlation to serve as a "natural and justified response" to misogyny. It's not a question of proportional response: it's an illogical response. Th…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 05:19 PM
31

The mental gymnastics required to femsplain away the misandry rampant among feminists would cause a brain hemorrhage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 11:31 AM
12

I don't feel emasculated by feminists whatsoever. My manhood is rooted in biology and the suggestion that I'm personally oppressing anyone is absurdist melodrama. It's like feeling ashamed of being black just because KKK idiots wax "superior." They're declaredly antagonists and demonstratively lame-brained, so their opinion of me is irrelevant. All they do w their hatred of and antagonism against men is demonstrate their own self-effacing incompetence at reckoning w reality and their own patheti…
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 02:04 AM
5

I remember when Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarsleazian went to the UN (of all places) to demand an end to "cyber violence"... All the weeping and gnashing of teeth around internet trolling always just seemed like pure childishness and egotism compared to the general reaction to the trolling that happens on the roadway when idiots behind the wheel make a game of life and death. The latter trolling can kill, maim, destroy property, destroy lives. The former has the power to- OH NO!- hurt someone's feelin…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/25 12:21 AM
8

Misogyny is the misandrist cult’s “original sin” for men. The difference is that religion pretends to offer “redemption” for your supposedly inherent crime of being born- ie, through lifelong contributions to careers in religion- while feminists just consider men hopeless sinners and advise to avoid. That’s the equivalent of the Indian caste system designating a section of society as “untouchables”… except it’s half the population… Also they don’t elaborate on the “instillation” process. Nowaday…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/25 08:12 PM
1

Just look at the relatively popular Whatever Podcast where Brian Atlas/Andrew Wilson- declaredly Rightwing, Christian, etc.- features prostitutes and self-proclaimed feminists in order to mock them for their poor lifestyles, anti-male attitudes, and political naivete. The Right has been advocating for both sexes to conform to the religious standards of 2000yrs ago. The Muslim Right would have women in burkas (and all men in beards rather than just "shower and dress better"). That said, it's not …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 06:27 PM
21

Expect, yes. Anticipate, sadly no.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 05:13 PM
6

The "emphasis" in that blurb is on reassuring women that they don't need to do anything cuz that whole males are lonely thing is a man problem... which isn't a "systemic" or "social" or "economic" approach since a social system and economy involve both men and women. It's not a collaborative approach. It states that loneliness isn't an "individual failing" or "about dating or relationships", but it demonstrates the feminist view that men are a problem that has to be fixed- albeit that the Mamdan…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:45 PM
17

"Yes, of course it can go wrong and be used maliciously"... Admits that using FB that way is fully open to exploitation by sociopaths and yet decides to be an apologist for it regardless... It's the essence of "innocent until proven guilty" v "guilty until proven innocent". The former is oriented toward ensuring the process isn't just a lynch mob mechanic and not normalizing doxxing practices. The latter is a crass machiavellian apologism for enabling a lynch mob to do its thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 06:58 PM
11

I can't tell if that's pure nihilism or misandry. After all, the image asserts men also not "caring" despite that misandrists generally assume men do care about themselves and that they wish to spite men for doing so. And the comment on the image doesn't counter that there's any day that isn't "useless," including Susan B Anthony Day. In that way I can partially agree: I'm also not a fan of "women's history month" (an entire month, mind you) or the like either. I agree w Morgan Freeman that raci…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/25 06:38 PM
15

The staggering cliff of naïveté entailed in the logistics of a fratricidal genocide highlights the sheer stupidity behind hating people born w some biological norm. From the hellish political landscape of committing genocide in the first place to the utter lack of women alone to build and sustain the infrastructure to the existence of sociopathy among women (from which genocide advocacy derived) that undermines the idyllic sense of women as magically endowed w social harmony. The ones pushing fo…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 07:57 PM
1

Was it a man who made the clip though? Could've been Ms. Princess Wannabe superimposing the articulation of her rationalizations for devaluing men over a vid of a guy she's fantasizing to be willing to haplessly accede to an "earned value" status for men... Or it's actually a total simp publicly demonstrating his buffoonery, but still...
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/25 04:33 AM
2

Perhaps projection. “Well, if men are like me, clearly they’re evil.”
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 07:56 PM
1

Frankly I don’t know how anyone can tolerate his low-effort, substanceless mumbling hours on end to finally find a decisive statement like that. And the guy’s rich from speaking drivel for so much of his time only to lightly pepper in comments so nitwitted that people really should’ve recognized at some point he’s just wasting their time. For sure feminists aren’t tuning in to him just for the chance of a rare occasion of a welcome, quotable misandrist quip. He’s one of those “man” people after …
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/25 07:54 PM
5

She put it in quotes too to make it very clear that that poor grammar was entirely hers. That was her college learnin' kicking in. Your just jealuss of how edumacated she are.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/25 06:19 PM
65

Despite the misandrist tendency behind their “effort” to determine the most surefire anti-male bigotry, they managed mostly only to come up with digs vs short people and poorer/working class people. Bigots aren’t known for being the brightest shed in the drawer.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/25 11:20 PM
2

There was a recent post on r/skeptic w a “study” that purported that rightwingers on Reddit tend to post politically on subs very explicitly rightwing while leftwingers on Reddit tend to post politically on subs that aren’t even political in nature. It wasn’t the “study” that was disturbing, though it did beg the question of what it was for: nearly every reply on that post was outright demonizing rightwingers as the worst of humanity. All uniform replies one after another playing the same tune. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 07:57 PM
5

Great clip. Wonder what Steinem's reply was. Farrell's was to become a male advocate...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 06:09 AM
10

“Look, guys, I didn’t invent nature… I just use the concept of ‘nature’ as an excuse to call you ‘secondary’ and ‘expendable’ because I’m a contemptible bigot. Why are you offended?”
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/25 12:48 AM
14

It’s the “society sees” aspect that most concerns me. I can personally let insults fall flat as the verbal posturing they are, but for this sort of tendency to have become so endemic belies a social conditioning that’s been going on like a crime hidden in plain sight. I don’t know what impact it’s had for it to be so normalized, but it’s got to have been as damaging as the tendency to emphasize the race of the perpetrator when they’re non-white and be race-neutral w white perpetrators. Not sure …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 12:44 AM
16

“Well, women were treated w indifference and callousness by some men in the past- I mean, not us, but still- so therefore I’m gonna treat all men w the same indifference and callousness in today’s world!” The logic of a sociopath’s rationalization. They don’t seek a world without indifference and callousness toward others in society and are thus entirely part of the problem. They only pine for a world in which they themselves demonstrate the indifference and callousness without social consequenc…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/25 09:45 PM
14

Normally human beings don’t tend to antagonize those they fear. Sorta just doesn’t happen. Instead they avoid and/or recoil. So that rationalization for misandry is just the lowest of effort. “I wasn’t gonna say he’s a demon and a manbaby and crying weak little man tears, but I was, uh, frightened of him… yeah… so out came the hate epithets and trash talking, amiright?” That feminists are prone to instead antagonizing men is more a matter of the bully who’s determining what they can get away w a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 04:54 PM
1

The oppressed class hasn’t won. The only classes in existence today are capitalists, the working class, and middling capitalists. Capitalists will always be the oppressor class while capitalism dominates. It’s systemic matter: there is no “woman system” that took over the “man system” because neither exist. The capitalist system has presided throughout ever since it overtook feudalism. Women and men are the two sexes, not the economic classes of a social system. Instead what did happen over time…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 06:05 PM
15

It’s worse though because it’s not happening in a vacuum: we’ve already seen this tendency of the Dems to pick for optics rather than substance, and w the Dems needing to overcome their “man problem” (antagonism to rather than incorporation of men), it’s just looking like learn-nothing business as usual. Nothing like doubling down on a losing strategy. We’ll see how it plays out (again)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 08:02 PM
15

I mean, if you feel the hate reeeeeaaally bad, then surely it must be justified... right? XD
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 05:49 AM
42

lol "And now they're trying to ban our hate speech! How dare they! What kind of feminist subreddit would adopt a rule that would stand in the way of us articulating hate against men?! We just wanna make hatred of men a normative rite of passage in society, but no! What's next? Now we can't be bigots to men on the street either?! What is this world coming to!?? Help! We're being oppressed by male nature!!!" Feminists do need to stop opposing what they perceive as misogyny in men's statements. Aft…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/25 05:03 AM
8

I remember thinking something similar when I first noticed the tendency back in the early 2010s- that the rampant misandry is so deplorable, self-defeating, self-contradictory w anti-bigotry stance, and ultimately unsustainable that it’ll likely die an early death and go obsolete as a regrettable fad of obscure trash-talkers exclusive to that needlessly divisive moment. My naïveté was in overlooking the financial investment that would perpetuate it- the controversy courting for ad revenue, the f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/25 08:22 PM
3

Me pointing out the errors in your assertions contradicts your insistence that I’m not reading said errors. Your OP brandishes this fluff as if a decisive blade: “The real question isn’t whether gender or class is the ‘true’ site of oppression, but how hierarchy itself — economic, political, or ideological — keeps regenerating in new forms.” You’re sloppy at reasoning- which isn’t an asset except for deception- so there’s little of substance to work through there, but that IS opposition to an am…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 10:09 PM
1

I answered the failure in your understanding of terms, but I can’t fix what insists on being incorrect as a modus operendi. It’s a matter of orientation- ie to the material reality rather flowery idealism. Idealism is a capitalist tendency btw. In your OP you already confessed to being anarchistic by inanely opposing “hierarchy” as if human beings are going to spontaneously “become communist.” It’s just fantasyland. You’re bringing nothing new to analyzing Marxism, just failing to address realit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 08:19 PM
2

As Trotsky put it regarding reading Stalin’s pretend theorizing, “like chewing glass.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 08:08 PM
3

Yes, feminists misappropriate terms like “class”- though in this case it’s you doing so to make the false equivalence, so I won’t even assume it’s a feminist tendency. It’s not an amorphous term even if it’s treated that way. The term “evidence” means something a lot more substantive to a scientist than a lawyer since the scientist has to meet criteria while the lawyer just has to be persuasive. Class refers to fundamental economic-based social differences, not And, yes, a Marxist would say so… …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 07:57 PM
4

The "parallel" isn't particularly convincing, especially since merely placing them in the same sentence isn't a particularly insightful comparison. More curious is why such an assertion in the first place. What purpose is there in drawing the false equivalence? For sure there are feminists who pretend to reconcile "patriarchy" rhetoric w what they're content to claim is Marxist, but- like most people- there isn't much clarity on what Marxism actually entails and there's little in the way of expe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/25 07:49 AM
9

I’ve never seen feminists condemn misandry. I’ve seen them deny it exists, deny it’s a problem, refuse to acknowledge it as bigotry, saying it’s not “as bad” as misogyny (thus acknowledging misandry is bad but only in that context), mock men who oppose it as crybabies, make excuses for it by saying men deserve the hate (which is ultimately exactly how every hate group rationalizes their hatred), claiming it’s natural given how comfortable they are w their hatred, and outright celebrating misandr…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 10:44 PM
1

I made it up- was a joke about how flagrantly feminists articulate their misandry, casually forming explicit bigotry subreddits then casually forming new ones when/if the first gets banned. Still surprises me TBH- not acclimated to a world in which open bigotry is back en vogue.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/11/25 09:21 PM
2

This is also a weakness/vulnerability of "social sciences" as a science. The "hard" sciences have very definitive, decisive proofs, and the math is largely all that's required. Then you apply science to, say, geology or evolutionary biology or the cosmos- and now you've got some more difficult proofs- how we got the age of Earth wrong for a while, still struggling for a definitive estimate of the universe or a definitive handle on quantum mechanics, still refining evolutionary theory. But on the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 04:12 PM
4

The “many feminisms” delineation sounds like an ice cream shop assortment of academic careers. “I’ll take radical feminism and black feminism in a sugar cone please!” Much of it is at most the sort of matter that gets introduced in universities, maybe Ted Talks, but not in any meaningful social development or practical context beyond allocating resources or laws exclusively to women for one thing or another. It’s also a “world according to feminists” approach to global politics which is abhorren…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 10:14 PM
6

Actually a new party in the US sounds less difficult simply because the Left party- Dems- is so clearly a big business party. In the UK there’s a declaredly Left party (Greens) AND a Labour Party, both of which sound like they’re kinda what the US Dems are lacking… but aren’t. So a US Labor Party would both signal a return to a working class orientation and set a new political precedent for the Left against the demoralizing bigotry it’s become associated with. For sure I don’t see how the contem…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/25 08:59 PM
8

The oversimplification tendency is a modus operendi for the misandrist ideologues. In no way is a straight white homeless man more “powerful” than Oprah or Kamala or Whoopie. Strains the use of the term “power” and begs the question of why they’d make the error in the first place. In reality the oversimplification entails convoluting the term “sexism” as “well, only if…” rather than just taking bigotry as it is without trying to find loopholes. That approach is only instrumental in masking socio…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/10/25 10:09 PM
24

“Hatred of men doesn’t exist cuz people who make a career, habit, and/or life goal of hating men make excuses for doing so.” I’d rather laud the people who endure sociopathic violence or loss and stoically, brazenly preserve their sense of integrity and honesty- ie, rather than resort to easy street hatred for entire groups of human beings.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/10/25 06:53 PM
6

Late to noticing this post, but good work. Yes, it's not just an "ideological difference" or a natural extension of advocacy for women that feminists take the sociopathic anti-male positions they do. The only genuine explanation is their calloused bigotry for which they should indeed be held accountable. When the vast swath of men and women who see those quotes and tendencies are immediately offended by and openly discourage them, making it a thoroughly rejected stance to take publicly, that wil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/25 06:31 PM
8

Case in point... I made a reply to this some hrs ago that was essentially a reversed version- obviously intending to mock it, showing how a reversal of sexes on this made the intolerability pretty damn clear- and it got deleted by Reddit w a ban warning as being an actual threat of violence they can't tolerate: "Reddit is a place for creating community and belonging, not for threatening violence against people or animals. We don’t tolerate any behavior that threatens violence or physical harm ag…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 05:58 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/EverydayMisandry26/10/25 05:25 AM
5

Feminist: “Hate men! Men suck! Kill all men! You’re all a bunch of man-babies and rape apologists and you’re stalking and catcalling and abusing and stubbing our toes and that one time I was late to work was your fault too, plus I can’t find my car keys, so you must’ve-“ Feminist-conditionally-approved Man: “Who me?” Feminist: “Uh… no, I meant other men.” Feminist-conditionally-approved Man: “Phew. Cuz you weren’t specifying in the least, so I got scared you meant-“ Feminist: “You should just kn…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/10/25 09:08 PM
11

Like her I think only of the suffering feminists making up excuses for indifference to men’s lives torn apart by war, no reflection on the men who toiled to mine the materials for, create, and ship the cellphones and computers that enabled them to articulate their misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 06:57 PM
8

Me too XD “Oh, must’ve been typing fast to have misspelled ‘woman’… oh.” Shows just what inanity one can get up to w a regular misandrist choir to entertain and lots of time on one’s hands. Don’t know why they misspelled womblets as just “girls.” Misogynists!
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 06:51 PM
7

Qualitative difference between anti-intellectualism and anti-academia. The former is ultimately opposition to thinking- the most glaring example being Pol Pot's genocide of people w glasses. "That'll show 'em to be smurt!" The latter is opposition to a way of thinking that tends to sterilize thought and only apply it to reality as if it exists in a vacuum (which it doesn't). Nothing wrong w education, but once you're in the adult world beyond schoolin', thinking becomes informed by more dynamic,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 06:00 PM
6

I get the idea that you'd want Leftists to not "become Rightists", especially since, as far as I'm concerned, this is a great opportunity in history for at least one section of those who used to simply be Leftists (I mean, straights, whites, and men have largely been evicted from the Left) to go Neither Party. Making issues- or even ideology- a matter of party alignment has increasingly become political schizophrenia given the poison infused in both parties. I mean, both were always there to pri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 05:20 AM
1

I think it's gotten to a point where their misandry is long since out of the closet. For #KillAllMen to be a thing, it's no longer just that one nutjob. Misandry and general antagonism w men has long since displaced essentials like abortion rights or, well, anything else in the feminist priority list for determining tone and policy. I was already seeing the widespread ossification of the tendency in the early 2010s... when I was still calling myself a feminist...
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 03:43 AM
2

It’s important to distinguish between them. Feminism as I used to know it prioritized actual women’s issues- abortion being front and center- and was relevant to working class women given the ties to organized labor. Nowadays feminists prioritize their adopted antagonism vs men and the “empowerment” of women CEOs, influencers, and consultants… while abortion slipped away and the working class as a whole now simply has no use for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 02:23 AM
14

Yes- I don’t think a single response was from genuinely reading anything- every single take emerging as a non sequitur born of prejudice and bad faith. Easy to be completely dismissive of something represented entirely as a bigoted caricature of itself.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 02:10 AM
17

I would hate other men just for having been born men- you know, like me- but I just lack the requisite courage… cuz hate requires courage, and hating women is simply not courageous enough… Oh, wait, I meant I lack the requisite sociopathy. But feminist logic does conflate courage and sociopathy, so, understandable error…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/25 06:51 PM
8

Feminism did used to be largely about simple social equality- no frills, just the epic fulfillment of that historic goal. Once it was largely achieved, we got contemporary feminism which, yes, requires a constant male chorus of "you go, girl!" even while pushing #KillAllMen. Recall the 2024 Dem election ad that explicitly instructed men to be cheerleaders: "Kamala, look me right in the eye and accept my full-throated endorsement!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLzYPbtklGs There's no end to tha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 04:53 PM
4

So... the lowest marriage rates since the aftermath of the US Civil War? Wasn't aware they were collecting data for that back then, but OK. Welcome to the fun of post Civil War romance... without a civil war... Divide-and-conquer does have consequences...
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:52 PM
9

lol "I have MORE standards than you! I have DOUBLE standards!"
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:42 PM
12

That would absolutely not end abortion since unwanted pregnancy is an inevitability of women and men having access to each other sexually. People will always want the oomph without necessarily wanting the blastocyst. Loving couples oops all the time, and not all coupling will be for a "stable relationship" (as defined by a feminist hahaha). Forced vasectomy of children? How bout for girls too- just to make sure? That feminism is for sociopaths cannot be understated...
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:40 PM
21

My first reaction is that no one should just "be believed" while "innocent until proven guilty" should be the proper stance. I mean, no one should automatically "be disbelieved" either, but stilll. I always think of the Anita Sarkeesian lecture where she had a big "BELIEVE" showing behind her while lecturing about any woman claiming to have been raped. But in that instance your own abuse was irrelevant: you just pointed out how asinine a comment was, so- like you argued- you not only didn't viol…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:30 PM
7

The world according to someone w "predation"-colored glasses... whatever "predation" even means... and misandrist since there's an "underestimation of the issue" of women's predation if the term "predation" includes any form of it... Even if "a lot of guys" are pollyanish about other men, I doubt most men are. It's hard to judge someone only on the content of their character if you're assuming something about their character- for ill or for "good"- entirely by a random reality of being born one …
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/25 05:01 PM
6

For sure the organized Left needs to publicly, conspicuously, and unequivocally reject the bigotry they've been tolerating- i.e., against men, whites, and straights. Just has to be a sweeping, uncompromising, principled rejection of it, making it a zero tolerance issue right along w the already-accepted rejection of bigotry against non-whites, homosexuals, and women. If the default rhetorical and political orientation of the Left isn't to humanity as a whole, it's got a fundamental, fatal flaw, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/25 04:33 AM
-1

It’s not so much that “the force is female” can be used non-misandrist ways, but that it’s the sort of feminist-speak that’s technically not in itself misandry while almost inevitably existing within a context of applying misandry. David Duke suggesting that “the force is white” isn’t saying a single derogatory comment about non-whites in that statement itself, but… please. Then you check the context and it’s stated at a Klan rally where nitwits are shouting, “Jews will not replace us!” Aaaand t…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/10/25 02:16 AM
14

I’ve been monitoring r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates a while- very interesting demographic, the men rejected by the feminist Left- not automatically shifted Right but recognizing that they’re not exactly welcome in the Left. The political limbo I’ve been for decades. They often discuss all those issues. This subreddit seems more focused as a feminist misandry watchdog, but it’s been very informative.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/25 08:27 PM
-14

There’s a lot of failure these days to learn the lesson from the well-known tale of the boy who cried wolf. I’ve heard so much called fascism that just plain isn’t by any stretch of definition- a term so overused that if fascism we’re to be reintroduced for real, no one would have a well-established definition to refer to. All we have is hyperbole. Feminist use of “misogyny” is used the same way to encompass things that simply entails women not getting any and everything they want. Misandry woul…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/25 06:58 PM
1

Again: would reading her books change reality? Nope. Nor would having been an eyewitness to her life to account for the veracity of the stories she wove on paper. Hatred of men is bigotry however you boil it, stew it, fry it, or bake it, and bigotry is never justified even while it’s always rationalized. There are people who suffer far worse than what she claims to have and yet emerge on the other side w wisdom and a brilliant perspective about human society free of the rose-colored glasses most…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/10/25 04:04 PM
24

I don’t know about labeling their org as a hate group, but the tone deafness is striking enough to wonder at the motivation behind it. To wade into a war zone in which men are clearly the ones in direct line-of-fire- sometimes while protecting women civilians- and just walk past all the men on stretchers or male civilians- young and old- looking for a single woman to “rescue”… W4W “Ah, there’s a woman! We’re here to rescue you, sister!” Bleeding male civilian: “Is there room in your rescue vehic…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/10/25 09:37 PM
1

And that makes every woman’s experience the same? That makes every man’s sexuality violence? Just don’t. I’ll just go right ahead and keep stating the facts any time stupid tries to assert itself- regardless of where the stupid comes from.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/10/25 06:51 PM
1

I'm curious whether they ever have a moment where they see an r/letsopenlyhateblackpeople type bigotry- i.e., r/letsopenlyhateanyothergroupthanmen- and recognize the obvious same-same of the sociopathy. Or are they just so cravenly bigoted that they don't notice much of anything outside their hate spewing? Sociopaths always have a rationalization, but when the pursuit of hate is this tediously persistent there's a shallowness akin to a malfunctioning robot, something a human should have the sens…
/r/EverydayMisandry13/10/25 05:29 PM
9

The column categories are more accurately titled as: “Feminism Lite” and “Feminism”. The left column statements could all have a meaningful, non-hostile context isolated on their own, but they still nevertheless demonstrate that all that feminist “someones” want to “say” is harping on supposed failings of males and their bad experiences w men. Every one of those left-column statements could, after all, also be within the context of setting up the rationalization for the right column. And how oft…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/10/25 02:21 AM
16

Hetero women indeed absolutely resent the contempt of getting oral sex from a guy. Totally. Just awful. Then when their guy gets to schtuppin'... how they suffer so! Don't! Stop! Don't! Stop! Dworkin sounds like she's demonstrating how the sour grapes principle works applied to the sex she wasn't getting... or the sex she simply didn't want other women to have...
/r/EverydayMisandry11/10/25 08:02 AM
6

Yes, that’s why I said that even on the most good faith interpretation, it still comes across as obtuse. “Yes, yes, death and buildings blown up and whatever, but about the dating scene. That’s what NYCers wanna know.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/25 06:22 AM
32

“Cuz, see, us feminists are just, let’s say, ‘being wary’ of men… when we endorse #killallmen and explicitly say we hate men and actively disrespect men we meet on the basis of the sex they were born and choose to be mauled by a bear over protected by a man and publicly mock the male loneliness epidemic and orchestrate misandrist themes in the entertainment industry and other ‘wary’ stuff. And if you can’t swallow the pill of our thoroughly rationalized ‘wariness’, clearly you deserve all the ‘w…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/10/25 08:54 PM
14

The only way that quote doesn't come across as pure feminist obliviousness to men's lives as human beings is if it was quoted out of the context of an article that was specifically written to feature women's dating scene news. In that case the focus on women's "plight" of fewer men in the available dating pool at least reflects the focus on the chosen topic. However, that that was the chosen topic- explored entirely without a semblance of empathy w Ukrainian men- remains suspect and indicative..…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 03:38 PM
28

lol It reads like perfect parody, but, no, they're actually seriously so indifferent to the lives of men in their egotism that they can describe out the carnage in men's lives as nothing but a relative inconvenience to women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 03:25 PM
8

Bernie is definitely the only Dem- only US politician- that I've seen that's been consistently good w their rhetoric- over a lifetime even. It may be that his choice of AOC was due entirely to simply having no one else, but even an unknown who's got the rhetoric down would be preferable to a Dem that can't course-correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/25 03:03 PM
0

Childbirth is dangerous in ALL cases. Pumping out a watermelon isn’t just bad IBS. Before modern medical tech women died a lot more often trying to conceive, but even today it’s still a gamble w one’s life. Small risk is still risk. Forcing a woman into it is- without the slightest hyperbole- treating that risk as irrelevant, treating her life as irrelevant. Some matters are just that clear. It’s the one issue feminists could use to successfully argue misogyny since banning abortion is only poss…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/10/25 11:35 PM
1

Dunno why nitwits insist on being nitwits. Never appealed to me personally, and I stopped trying to psychoanalyze nitwits decades ago… Whatever sociopathic rationalization is contrived to advocate forcing women into childbirth- a condition that risks the woman’s life, forces unwanted population into a society that isn’t even trying account for it and is already overpopulated, and violates the right of a human being to final say about what their body is to be used for and how it’s to be used- it’…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/10/25 06:57 PM
23

r/imahappybigotvsmen: “Yeah, but it’s not sexism if it’s hatred of men. How could hating men be toxic or sociopathic or-“ banned
/r/EverydayMisandry07/10/25 11:09 PM
44

I've seen AOC do some excellent work hammering liars brought before Congress or even spontaneous debating, but resorting to ad hominem that way just demonstrates a tendency to failure. And Miller is one of the biggest scum that Trump's recruited- the one most active behind the scenes orchestrating masked, unmonitored state-run violence against citizens and who knows what else- so if that's the best she can do to undercut him... Short guy mockery? The ass is 5'10"... Epic fail... She's made other…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 04:12 PM
11

Hate = hate. *shrug* Stop the hate. Simple. They need to stop making excuses for misandry rather than pretending misogyny is "special". The notion of misogynistic violence (rape being sexual violence) against women being "in masses" is also a stretch. Violence is occurring in human society, men themselves being the overwhelming recipients, but whether or not violence against either men or women is "in masses" is the stretch: violent sociopathy is the small minority, so it begs the question of wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/10/25 03:54 PM
17

Wait- it was actually explicitly called “misandristtalk”? How many hours would a misogynisttalk subreddit last? Or minutes? You know, just a get-together for a chat and a chaw and a hate on some group in society we think we can get away with…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/10/25 02:02 AM
3

Your argument is based on symbolism? The early USSR had a lot of black and red- and African colors are striking as well… so fascist? No, I’m not convinced of fascism by outward shows, particularly as a paper tiger will be trying to bear scary stripes as well and still be paper. Hyperbole about fascism is far too common. Fascism comes from one source: a desperate capitalist class seeking to militarily pit the “middle” class against the working class to stave off social revolution in the midst of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 01:12 AM
6

lol yep… Mostly such “concerns” of theirs come from living in social conditions that enable having the luxury to be needlessly pissy. A century ago even owning a personal vehicle was for the “lucky” ones. Nowadays it’s demonstrably fashionable to wax misandrous about how one handles one’s vehicle’s maintenance.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/25 08:48 PM
26

That’s not a band-aid. That IS the bigotry it’s purporting to counteract. No one treats a knife wound w a stab.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/10/25 06:53 PM
11

"Every time I accuse all men of being pedos they downvote me! It's cuz they're pedos and evil!" Impeccable logic. Guess she's right. Next she should accuse all men of being aliens from another planet. Woh! Downvoted again! Proof!
/r/EverydayMisandry05/10/25 07:47 PM
9

It actually sounded (until the last line) like trying to reason out social equality appropriately. It just begs the questions of: Both the man and woman are going to bring income receipts and a calculator to the first date? (How about a walk in the park instead of dinner to simplify it?) How is either one going to prove the other’s accurate financial wealth estimate? An employed woman could just claim she’s unemployed and demand 100%. What about when the woman makes 30% more? She gonna pay that …
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/25 07:11 PM
7

For sure the misandry has to stop being so commonplace, and a return of empathy and general solidarity would be helpful, but, no, legal and policy changes do need to be made for men’s rights. At present women are getting preferential treatment that only enables sociopathic outcomes like unfit mothers winning full custody, false rape accusations, ex-husbands returning to apartments while the ex-wives shack up in the house w a new guy, etc. Abortion should be reinstated nationally in the US but al…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 09:15 PM
12

The “decentering” tactic- made explicit and flagrant that way- more than other feminist tendencies makes the misandrist intent behind feminism incontrovertible. Not coincidental that it also gets articulated/demonstrated amidst straight-up misandrist commentary, but no one meaningfully, productively, or progressively seeks to actively ignore an entire population that is distinguished by merely being born a sex. As advice it’s intended to cultivate the bigotry, not combat it.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/25 06:57 PM
14

Nearly completely true and well-stated up to the point where the demoralization is blamed on women and old people... Women do participate in it, particularly feminists jumping on the demoralization bandwagon for "male tears" and such. Old people though? The ones in retirement homes or just qualifying for Social Security (before Trump removes that along w Medicaid)? Or the rich old people- and the rich women and the rich men who also don't do the dangerous work, manufacture the physical goods, re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/25 02:30 PM
93

As opposed to girls who pop out of their mothers like an orgasm and live like pretty Santa Clauses spreading merry good cheer everywhere they go…
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/25 06:55 PM
35

Sounds a bit like when Colbert did his bit on the male loneliness epidemic by considering it just the "dudebro" "manosphere" making noise and laughed it off on national TV. The prominent Left simply can't be kind to men because that would be an affront to the feminist misandrists they prefer to indulge. Everyone knows that vitriol toward men is the way to show support for women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/25 03:34 AM
12

Exactly what I was wondering. “Manosphere” is just feminist lexicon-speak for “anything that unfortunately reminds me of men”. But “red pill” doesn’t reference the Left-Right blue-red colors, and instead derives from “The Matrix” which has nothing to do w contemporary feminism/ideology/politics. So I’m not seeing the necessary delineation between Leftist male advocates and “Redpill” ones. I can definitely see the contrast w the Tate types since it’s not so much male advocacy at all but rather pu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/25 08:47 AM
1

Part 2 But that doesn't make the contemporary use of "black fatigue" racist or stupid. It's a tad different to have a .0001% of white men be serial killers and assassins and then point a finger at all white men. Or when the vast majority of men aren't violent but feminists insist on calling all men violent and "toxic." But when you have large-scale repeated behaviors among blacks that are showing up incontrovertibly on countless videos and yet being swept under the lumpy carpet of anti-racism as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 05:19 AM
1

I take it you didn't even listen to any of those black people who "hate black people" for applying self-criticism of their own community... which makes my point: no criticism is to be tolerated. None of them hate themselves. They're making a genuine effort to curtail tendencies they'd rather not see be as widespread among black people specifically. None of them said that "all black people" yada yada. None of them said "most black people." All of them issued the criticism while living as, with, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/25 05:18 AM
1

There’s a difference between systemic discrimination/inequality and systemic bigotry. Bigotry in general does tend to work in favor of the ruling class: divide and conquer has been around since ancient civilization. But there’s no equivalent for men generally to Jim Crow- a purely hate-based legal and institutional development after chattel slavery. Or, say, the caste system of India that actually incorporated hate for “untouchables.” Feminists can advocate treating men as “untouchables” (and th…
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/25 12:00 AM
31

So “genetic defects” (everything from substantive criteria like “vibe” and “personality” to people w disabilities) are how feminists explicitly rationalize a view of half the species as “dispensable.” Notwithstanding that women aren’t less likely to have “genetic defects”, just that a second X that lacks the “defect” will be dominant and prevent it showing in the female, so that women become carriers of “defects” no less likely than men who then clearly got it from their mother… It’s just curiou…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/09/25 08:47 PM
1

Misandry isn't a form of oppression: it's a way to keep people divided... which makes both the haters and hated easier to oppress. All hate-based stupidity works like that. Even if feminist mockery doesn't make men commit suicide over it, the divisiveness was already a fait accompli: divide and conquer. As to misandry not being "on the same level" as the feminist-pretend patriarchy, the very use of "patriarchy" is part of the same misandry. So it the same "level"- or "patriarchy" is part of the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/09/25 02:00 PM
1

Well, that took a wrong turn fast. Are you asserting that any of those I quoted are black white supremacists? XD None of them are. At least one is on the Right (which is not equivalent to white supremacist even if it's fairly deluded to support Trump), but the rest are likely liberals. But this sort of immediate hyperbole is exactly what they (and so many more) were talking about: any criticism- even of poor behavior- is immediately recontextualized as rampant racism despite that the criticisms …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/25 06:51 AM
10

Referring to the social system we’re presently in as a patriarchy is stating unequivocally that the ruling class is men, that simply being male gives one ruling powers in society, and thus that lousy rule is thereby “men’s fault.” Capitalists would disagree… If you’re a man, go live like a billionaire while without access to billions (or the capital that gets valued as such). Women who simply marry a billionaire may be able to live like or join the ruling class, but men generally have to actuall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 11:37 PM
16

“Fighting for their own liberation…” From? They have had social equality for decades now, even had plenty of advantages over men- other than the recent, significant loss of abortion. And that was directly related to their use of misandrist bludgeoning rather than fighting for their own interests effectively. Contemporary feminism (2010s forward) is fundamentally different than it originated when “liberation” meant something. Misandry is hate of men. It’s a product of sociopathy, not a tool of “l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 10:54 PM
13

If they recognize that the hammer bludgeons and they require a tool w greater sophistication, it is ONLY those w malice who then bludgeon away regardless. It’s not an innocent “ignorance”, and obtuseness is quite willful. The only “hope” to have is that they recognize their interests are shared w men rather than at odds w men and therefore abandon the feminism that enabled use of the misandrist cudgel in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 09:18 PM
4

I am fascinated at how AI was developed- wouldn’t have a clue how to start given the nuances of interactivity generally. But that it decided on its own to be ingratiating and softball-oriented to non-straightwhiteguys is still suspicious. I’m not convinced that it came to its current inequality of approach to information delivery entirely due to impressions from scanning human cultural references. We did see Grok piss off Musk by giving an accurate answer and then saw how rich asses do actually …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 09:03 PM
11

So essentially AI is programmed to absurdly walk on eggshells for women (and other groups). Not even robots are oriented toward straightforward social equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 08:28 PM
6

It’s a matter of economics. The rich got overly greedy to the point their capacity to lead humanity’s economic Titanic is compromised, so they amplify the tried-and-tested strategy of divide-and-conquer. That’s somewhat a simplification given that there are notable developments in the zeitgeist- humanity having successfully reached a point of a genuine attempt at social equality and finding that some inequality is inevitable and that overcompensation is deleterious. But that experiment has been …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/25 07:13 PM
2

The entire dynamic is absurd. Women are already in "leadership" positions- politicians, CEO's, determining positions in the entertainment industry, teachers, etc., so there's no reason to call for "let women lead." It's like calling to "Let women drive cars!" That works in Saudi Arabia where women were only recently granted that right, but in the West and Asia it's just... what? It's already happening. Feminists instead want men to abdicate all involvement in leadership and, well, if you read th…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/25 06:01 AM
1

Except it's not "alt-right" when blacks say it about themselves with reference to behavior rather than ideology, particularly blacks who are simply trying to correct pointless widespread misbehavior in society that's adversely affecting them. So in general it's just criticism- not condemnation, certainly not insistence that it's "racial" behavior (ie., genetic, universal, and unchangeable), and not intended in any other way than part of the solution rather than the problem. It's been a lack of s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/25 05:47 AM
18

Ohhh, I'm supposed to listen to her rationalization for misandry "cuz she seriously believes it." Makes all the difference. I don't indulge racist "beliefs" either... unless they're serious about it! Then I'm totally like, "Tell me everything!" Cue the J Jonah Jameson meme of "HAHAHA... You serious?"
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 01:34 PM
16

The naivete inherent in the notion of "if men weren't around" is the only way they're able to perpetuate the myth of a patriarchy. It's not just the taking for granted of the sacrifices- in lives, blood, sweat, and tears- men make to build and sustain society... which women simply are less equipped to do and actively acclimate to never having to do in the first place. More facepalm-inducing is if they think a world of only women would be free of exploitation, brutality, discrimination... They'd …
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/25 01:23 PM
13

Nothing like wearing an unequivocal red flag in the middle of one’s face… Very effective demonstration of the principle that hate reveals everything about the hater and nothing about the hated. “Hi. I have a sociopathic problem and I’m making it my identity.” Yes, we all noticed.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/25 06:51 PM
27

It’s pure projection. From the same “movement” that wants all men imprisoned until/unless feminist women decide they can come out, thereby providing us a clear picture of what their vision of a matriarchy would look like… And they’re judging men as wanting a slave?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 11:50 AM
21

Well, women can’t go chucking the men in jail, so we’ll just have to ask the men to put the men in… wait… And while we’re in jail, women will do the building construction and industrial labor and sanitation work and…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/09/25 12:49 AM
13

Can’t you see what’s “literally obvious?” Literally! Come on, this isn’t figuratively obvious. Surprised you found an angle that had them doubling down AWAY from “it’s not just some men”. Usually the response is “you’re just making excuses for the patriarchy”, but specifically including black and crippled men changed the tune to “just kidding… and you’re still just making excuses for the patriarchy if you don’t laugh.” “Blacks are trash, amiright?” “WTF?” “Just kidding.” “No… that’s not how joke…
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/25 09:28 PM
1

The claim is that it happens: 100% proven. I have no idea about the pervasiveness of that particular tendency, especially as “gotcha” vids tend to get more attention than the actual frequency of such events in society. The point (which you’ve been missing all along in an odd and unnecessary defensiveness about gym “culture”) is that claims of men “sexualizing” women in the gym (and elsewhere) are themselves heavily exaggerated, and your assertion that the gym milieu (in your limited experience) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/25 11:50 PM
1

Didn't recognize you'd edited in last part... Regardless of how my argument "feels" like it "hinges," you can check for gym entrapment vids yourself. Men don't tend to get asinine if they "catch" a woman looking them over appraisingly or even lustfully while they do whatever workout or showoffy physical feats on camera at a gym, so, yes, filming people that way isn't necessarily hostile. But if a guy tries to hit on a girl at the gym or even merely glances over at a woman there who's filming her…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/09/25 11:20 AM
9

The comparison of “black fatigue” and “toxic masculinity” is dismissible as apples-oranges. The former is shared especially by many blacks (who call it instead “ghetto fatigue”), deriving from frustration about fellow blacks that seem to be eager to live a despicable stereotype- and how prevalent and destructive the behavior is. I don’t know how the Right is trying to run w it, but otherwise it’s a healthy trend of self-criticism that’s been sorely lacking on the Left as the Left isolates itself…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/25 09:54 PM
4

That's the phrase you took issue with? XD Hard to know what your point is though. From everything else I said you should've picked up that I simply don't care if a woman's "natural butt lift" is "noticeable" in the gym. Why? Were you looking!?? SEXUALIZER!! When women are asininely filming themselves in an open gym "working out"- as well as filming others who never agreed to be in their little film project- and then posting it to wherever as clickbaity gotcha vids of "I'm so hot that men are alw…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/25 07:25 AM
10

I’ve never been able to make much of the term “sexualization” as people use it. Gym poser girls try to entrap men by filming their gym posing and then decrying any who look for “sexualizing” them. The ones who look can’t make the posers sexy or sexual by looking or even wishing really hard- as nor can the posers themselves- and tight-fitting “gym” clothes accentuating particular curves is the women’s choice, not the onlookers. Even a clear letch can’t sexualize someone else merely by publicly dr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/25 11:28 PM
7

Well, that feminist was at least correct that misandry isn’t a system in itself. It’s systemic, but it’s not a social system. As neither is misogyny. Patriarchy- rule by men- is a social system, but it can only be sustained in very small populations in isolated, primitive conditions. Same w matriarchy. Thousands of years later patriarchs and matriarchs are now a joke. As are slavocratic emperors and feudal kings and czars. We’re being ruled/oppressed by the capitalist rich (men AND women) now- i…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/25 06:57 PM
6

The contradiction always arises when Hot Girl X shows some underboob and a feminist lesbian and heterosexual guy exchange glances that show they’d had identical reactions to what they’d seen. The feminist then seeks an antagonistic revisionism about it. The guy just… enjoyed it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 06:54 PM
10

I've said for a while now that the "male gaze"- i.e., appreciating women sexually- isn't strictly male or heterosexual and is thus a misnomer. Lesbians and women bisexuals also can and do get off "gazing" at women, as can and do bisexual men. In fact, of the six sexuality permutations (leaving out asexuals) the only ones that don't have a "turned on by women gaze" are heterosexual women and homosexual men, so 4 of the 6 have "the gaze." So attributing "male" to it is just a product of the femini…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/25 03:54 PM
3

Possible. I've watched a lot of Carlin, never heard it, but he'd likely agree. I think the comedian I referenced is Dina Hashem, but I can't find the clip. EDIT: Ok, found it- a bit less elaborate than my rendition... https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yW37u3WqucY
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 04:34 PM
6

There's a better analogy for the Left and Right that I heard from a random Muslim woman comedian on YouTube (can't recall the name). She said that after being in the US long enough she finally understood the difference in that the Right realllly loves a con man politician- the snake oil salesman that's an obvious fraud, a huckster that they can root for, the wannabe lying schemer they can see through but respect for trying. Trump is simply the epitome of that con man type. The Left doesn't fall …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/25 02:46 PM
10

Sciencerific beliefs are the most holy. Holier than thou even. And that’s why people who are simply born into a particular population are scum. Checkmate, men! Now that’s sciencerism!
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/25 12:09 AM
18

I always harken back to the “Good Will Hunting” scene where he says his father would come home, lay a wrench and a belt on the table, and say, “Choose.” I don’t think it’s coincidental that the Left these days is as onerous and antagonistic to men as it is given how utterly corrupt, incompetent, and ingratiating to the rich that the current US candidate for the Right is: there’s no way he’d ever have been elected if the Left hadn’t been so repugnant. Either the Left is intentionally poisoning it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 11:58 PM
7

Contemporary feminism has no other than a regressive role to play- endeavoring to drive a wedge between men and women, orchestrating and enabling anti-male legal and cultural developments (whether pro-women or not). Abortion rights used to be front and center, but now it’s “decenter men” and push misandry in entertainment while rationalizing that sociopathic anti-male bigotry is “progressive.” The very assertion of a “patriarchy” is a confession of ill intent: society functions on the basis of a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 11:31 PM
6

I’m also blue collar (literally due to the uniform) and don’t tend to “build an identity” at all regardless of how others around me are asserting themselves- much less construct one for myself using gender assignments. I tend to just live… and since I thereby behave in ways associated w masculinity- being rational, thoughtful, calm under pressure, no melodrama- I likely don’t stand out as an exception otherwise for anyone w a “gender compass” orientation. “Progressive” is a tricky term though. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/09/25 10:20 PM
41

Lost me at the first sentence. Anyone opens w “most blacks/whites/Chinese/etc are scum”, I don’t need to “hear me out.” All that follows will be the rationalized sociopathy.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/09/25 09:00 PM
6

It’s amazing she was able to post to Reddit since supposedly men killed her. Can women Redditpost from beyond the grave? I thought men checked anywhere, everywhere killing women, but no, women are still over half the world’s population. “Everywhere” is apparently relative… The ratio of hyperbole to hatred is fairly demonstrably directly proportional.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/08/25 06:50 PM
23

The issue w feminism isn’t “in-group bias…” unless the in-group is all man-haters. The fundamental flaw of all special interest advocacy is that in itself it’s only circumstantially progressive. Black advocacy over half a century ago could be assailed for being “in-group biased”, but actually organization of black people against Jim Crow was essential, and it was overwhelmingly progressive. Its goal was social equality, it dismantled open legal oppression, and for decades there have no laws able…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/25 09:09 PM
13

I can’t tell if that’s a feminist exhortation or just an observation of feminist thought.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/08/25 06:49 PM
32

“Not all men” is an understatement intended as shortform for the argument: “the vast majority of men aren’t like that, but merely the fact that a single example exists of a man who isn’t one of ‘them’ demonstrates that misandrists are simple bigots for applying the brush universally.” It goes further than that though. Simple anti-male bigots are going to take a single “bad” example of a male and apply that template to all. There’ve been white racists who made exceptions for “good blacks”, but fe…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/25 06:57 PM
1

Misandrists have children too (somehow), so rules must be in place to cater to their irrational repugnance to men. What? Would you force whites to have to eat diner food alongside blacks like social equals??!!
/r/EverydayMisandry25/08/25 08:09 PM
38

Many women simply don't have the sociopathic tendencies to consciously indulge in the misandry that contemporary feminism requires. Not everyone can sufficiently lack empathy for the entire sex of men to be able to actively ignore the brutality they also experience.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/08/25 01:12 AM
1

Feminists do tend consistently for these exhortations to “normalize sociopathy”/ “normalize bigotry.” It’s not an argument, not an understanding, just a rally for adopting and acclimating to hate behavior- in their case toward men. Whites ultimately recognized that Jim Crow had to go, but feminists think a hate-based social arrangement is sustainable.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/25 06:58 PM
1

It’s mostly a matter of logistics because the ultimate horror of opposing abortion amounts to being in favor of abducting pregnant women in the street, taking them somewhere and strapping them down, and then either forcibly performing an abortion on them or forcing them to come to term (depending on your reason for opposing women having final, decisive say about what happens w their bodies). No sane, empathetic, reasonable human being can oppose women’s right to choose or prefer that women endur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/25 04:31 AM
3

She's not even responding to experience, just bigotry. Bigotry needs to be rejected flat out. The bigotry is what makes me "gag whenever I lay eyes on one." Bigots (misandrists or otherwise) are the ones that are "unkind" and "apes" and "selfish" and "disgusting" and "lack emotional capacity" (empathy) by definition, so uncoincidentally there's a plethora of self-revelation in it. Those aspects are mutually inclusive w the sociopathy of it. Also they're the ones that tend to be "aggressive," as …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/25 11:19 PM
1

Thanks for the new term- applies to so many instances, surprised the tendency's name only showed up in 2010.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/08/25 12:25 AM
8

I blame capitalism first and foremost- the issues being systemic- but that’s why I empathize w the OP on it. The constant emphasis on women’s health generally to the exclusion of the health of working people (who are predominantly men and are largely expected to live w the dangers and health cost) is an error that the rich would make as the ones in power. I’d never anticipate Gates coming out as an advocate for the people he uses to mine the materials for his products or fabricate and ship the p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/25 07:23 PM
12

Guy: "Can't we all just get along? Social equality and all that?" Them: "Didn't you get the memo? This subreddit is about misandry. We like hating men even more than we enjoy clean baths." He couldn't have been more ingratiating to them either- ugh- but sociopaths gonna sociopath. A lot of their responses sounded a lot like "sour grapes" regarding men- that they're incapable of mature relationships, so they just say men suck. Lesbians basing the quality of their romantic gestures on expressing m…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/08/25 03:32 PM
9

“Women are, when dating, incredibly more likely to suffer actual physical violence and harm than men…” Yeah, incredibly alright. The topic is dating between men and women so naturally a feminist immediately pivots to violence… If in a given pool of 100000 women and 100000 men, 50 women suffer “actual” physical violence and harm from the men during dating (the number rises incredibly when we factor in fictional physical violence and harm) and only 1 man suffers the same from a woman, yes, that’s …
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 02:03 AM
45

Mansplaining: when feminists can’t handle reality articulated by men that contradicts bigotry vs men articulated by feminists Manspreading: when feminists revile the presence of men on public transportation Mankeeping: when feminists resent heterosexual couples capable of the emotional maturity of working through a shared life together
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/25 01:43 AM
4

Yes- that diagram should be framed inside a speech bubble coming from the same pink-haired misandrist to a bunch of gay and straight, mixed race men… And maybe a few women in the group too… With everyone just shrugging it off…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/25 08:59 PM
3

“They are incapable of demonstrating any genuine emotion besides anger,” says misandrist, then continues on an irrational rant to demonstrate no genuine emotion besides anger… and hate…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/07/25 06:52 PM
3

They need to recognize that casually hating men is the polar opposite of the Civil Right Era. Bigotry and hating people based on their race, sex, or sexuality have to be intolerable in any form- mutually exclusive w social equality and even sustainable civil rights. Pick a bear over a human being (disingenuously or no), and you’re part of the problem. Until that time there’s no progress to be made- only progress to be lost- and if that time happens they’ll either try to preserve feminism by refo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/07/25 08:57 PM
3

The Right- and ideologues like you mention- are only able to articulate those reasonable positions w genuine authority because the Left abandoned those positions. We used to hear that rhetoric from the Left but not anymore. I’m a working class guy. The Right has ALWAYS been anti-worker, anti-union, pro-corporation. Always will be. But they feel comfortable these days saying they’re the party of working people (even while gutting Medicare and safety laws right in front of us) because the Left has…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/25 11:26 PM
5

Oh, I wasn’t suggesting the shift on the Right was due to “genuine care.” The Right used to be “Jim Crow OK” and was shifted- along w the law- by massive social pressure into an era of relative social equality. But they then adopted it and are now the ones ironically more conservative about “judging by the content of character rather than the color of skin.” The Left is flagrantly willing to judge by sex, race, and sexuality and build a platform around that bigotry… cuz man bad. But the Right is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/25 10:20 PM
5

I want to agree simply because women end up being granted a pass for acting purely on emotion instead of thinking through an issue/situation carefully or instead of deferring to reasonability rather than simple emoting. Not acting purely on emotion is generally a sign of mental health. I’m quite done indulging the melodramatic spazzes that go up on YouTube shorts or TikTok as if a good point was just made (other than “I’m demonstratively irrational!”) Men indeed don’t need to be more like that a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 10:06 PM
16

The two are sides of the same coin. The issue is assuming one needs to choose between them. Admittedly I did used to call the Left the lesser evil. But even that has become a suspect presumption. The Left is not conducting itself as the “good cop” anymore and is articulating outright bigotry, while the Right is largely the same asinine but shifted toward the social equality that the Left’s Civil Rights era mandated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/25 06:58 PM
1

:-) Thanks!
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/25 09:55 PM
2

Wish the OP had added that link to the redacted page.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/25 09:43 PM
7

I don't know if there's a single group in society to whom violence is done that it gets dismissed as "statistically insignificant" and "don't constitute a societal issue..." except men. Thing is, the total proportion of men being sociopathically violent to women is also an "outlier-" not even a significant minority of men much less indicative of men being "astronomically destructive as a group." Thus it could be "dealt w case by case" rather than "crying big sloppy tears" about men=bad. But ther…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/25 04:51 AM
8

That quote from the article suggesting a man-erased history contains the fundamental error: “But it’s worth dwelling on.” No, genocidal and bigoted musings are not worth anyone’s time. Not to mention that men built ALL the dwellings throughout history… which makes it a suggestion that humanity should never have left cave-dwelling…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 01:13 PM
3

“Men control the system.” Yes, homeless men need to think about the way in which they’re controlling “the system…” whatever that is. It may be titled “30yo”, but it’s written like a 5yo… which also contextualizes “men ah scawwy” and “men bullies.” The logic is pure child.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/25 01:37 AM
4

They find the stat that men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators of particular crimes and use it as a “gotcha” for men, but the portion of men doing the crimes is so low that the whole “not all men” is needless. It’s like having to say “not all women” when confronted w female teachers who diddle their students. Why would anyone even think to accuse the vast majority of women of having a genetic moral defect based on the behavior of a small minority? Unless you’re a bigot looking to stoke sociopat…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/25 01:12 AM
1

The term “objectification” has been demonized by the “I hate the male gaze” group, but it’s benign. Subjectification isn’t good or bad either. If a couple in a relationship have nothing they can “objectify” about each other- everything always completely personal- the relationship will peter out- likely in cheating where the objectification is accepted. It’s a normal, natural process to enjoy objective factors about one’s partner, and frankly I want to know if my girl likes my nose or my ass or t…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/25 10:24 PM
35

So… deliberate bigoted antagonism and encouraging others to do the same. Not often you get to see a sociopath’s tactics laid out so transparently. Usually they just boast after about what they got away with, but that one is essentially recruiting, so… There’s not even the hint of a rationalization- just a sociopath’s routine behavior laid out like a battle plan. People say that the last group in society that’s ok to publicly mock and harass are old people… or Italians… or midgets… But, no, it’s …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/25 09:54 PM
6

I'm starting to recognize that women's alleged emotional sophistication that feminists/misandrists like to parade out as if an advantage over men is more like the metaphor of a puddle that's a mile wide and an inch deep. After all, a sociopath who can effectively manipulate people is also skilled at emotional exchanges... and not in the least emotionally mature. Even when a man bumblingly expresses that he finds a woman attractive, he's expressing more genuine emotion than the sea of melodramati…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/25 04:27 PM
2

The notion of "women are better than men" or "women can do anything that men can do but better" is so immediately contradicted by reality that ANY permutation of it- whether in the Oppression Olympics or any other needless competition- is instantly inducing of cognitive dissonance. There's generally always going to be someone better than you at any and everything- or if you're the best, it's likely not forever and an ultimately meaningless advantage. Except the woman who holds the world record f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/25 01:47 PM
5

I suspect that this development has a two-fold cause. One is simple DEI hiring (though most are white women), and whatever else an be said about DEI, there is this aspect that hiring due to race, sex, or sexuality rather than for qualifications can leave out far more qualified candidates that are men... on purpose even. Upper management suffers from the same shortcoming as those women: they're clueless about the fundamental reality of how their industrial operation succeeds on a day-to-day basis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/25 12:48 PM
13

I work in industry and there's an element of this happening as well. At my plant there has been (still is) a lack of process engineers to assess and come up w solutions to various logistical and technical issues that the facilities have. Finally they hired people: women. ALL women. NONE of them had particularly much industrial experience- most had none at all. NONE of them are qualified for the positions whatsoever. Since they've been in there (over a year now) very little has been done, and wha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/25 12:48 PM
13

Yes, that’s exactly how science defines homo sapiens sex differentiation: “cuz men bad.” That’s also the answer to “Could you please pass the salt?”
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/25 08:19 PM
2

If feminists actually put forward an argument of "misandry is a reaction to misogyny", then it's literally a rationalization for equivalence, and in so rationalizing they admit that they simply hate men. Not entirely a revelation since they demonstrate and state it regularly, but they usually pretend they're not just a hate group. That argument would reveal otherwise: "we're devoted to hate... cuz... well... men hate too!" The thing that stands out for me about misandry is that, unlike misogyny …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/07/25 05:07 PM
3

Also, because their estimated 1.7% of child molesters are women, they've decided to ban women from the profession as well. So now w men and women out of the way, the rightful, perfect stewards of the next generation of humans can step forward: extraterrestrials. Nanu nanu. What's pathetic isn't the "overwhelming" predominance of men in the molester group. It's the insistence on banning huge amounts of qualified and excellent male teachers despite the "overwhelming" predominance of non-molesters …
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/25 04:25 AM
65

“No, I’m allowed to be a complete bigot to men! I have a full rationalization for it and everything!”
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/25 02:26 AM
7

lol And the double standard rages on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 02:20 AM
13

As usual it begs the question of a sex reversal: how would feminists view a similar site of men posting women’s photos to ask if they’re a “red flag”. Surely that would be just as reasonable…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 08:02 PM
7

But did ya see that girl trying to stop it?! She just couldn’t do a thing, that heroine. She’s the real victim here. Damn patriarchy!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 10:41 PM
9

Couple points of contention. Bill Cosby, etc, got away w it because they’re rich, not because they’re black. Whatever part the race card played, wealth was the decisive “card”. Joe Schmo black guy w a working class income would’ve gone to jail, race card or no. The “horseshoe theory” is a naive political perspective that ignores how people are manipulated into those extremist positions. A far-right nitwit isn’t going to casually switch to far-left given how same-same they are, even if, admittedl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/25 07:21 PM
1

“Feminists might occasionally go ‘urgh men’”… You know… occasionally… might- like, maybe. Could happen… Rare sighting. And then they proclaim in dire frustration at all the hell of enduring men keeping the social infrastructure in place: “urgh”. It’s cavewoman speak. No translation available to man.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/07/25 02:27 AM
8

Yeah, as well “articulated” and organized as that response is on the subject, my biggest takeaway is… AI did that? I know from experience AI will literally state incorrect things, but most of that checks out, so… huh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/25 06:55 PM
16

“If you were a real man, you’d suffer insults without speaking up against it.”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 06:55 PM
8

It just begs the question of why they’re trying to negatively characterize a particular sector of the population at all. That they end up applying a wider brush isn’t the operative concern. “Blacks are mostly a bunch of… I mean, not all. The toxic ones… Amiright??” See the dynamic?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/25 06:50 PM
3

The issue- as much as there is one- is symptomatic of the general rift that's been sewn between men and women- a contentiousness based otherwise on nothing. But really, being a woman isn't the equivalent of being an invalid no matter how passionately a woman tries to play that card in the Oppression Olympics. For a non-elderly, non-injured person, standing isn't torture (unless you're just that overweight... which is your problem), and sitting isn't a hate crime. All those men went to war also t…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/06/25 04:28 AM
20

Yeah. Once the initial “ok, both are evil and should go to jail”, all the rest was special pleading on behalf of female predators. It’s “evil”, dude. No hair-splitting oppression olympics required.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/25 08:16 PM
4

There was an element of misandry in movies decades ago, but it tended to be in a context of good humor- a lot like “racist” or other tease humor that- because of delivery ultimately amounted only to repartee. The friendly side of “ball-busting” that doesn’t relinquish respect in the least. That misandry has transitioned to hatred- actual ill will in no small way akin w the racial hatred during Jim Crow. Just substitute “black” for “man” in their rhetoric and it’s as grotesquely obvious. Civil Ri…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/06/25 07:14 PM
1

Is there a reason you leave out and cross off the names? Also the source- like which subreddit or wherever. Not implying anything, just that this subreddit is so informative and so demoralizing at the same time. I've been recognizing the misandry here and there, but now reading it here makes clear the regularity, casual malevolence, and quantity. So all I want is to have their comments in full paraded before a greater readership than their misandrist bubble. But maybe there's some rule about it …
/r/EverydayMisandry21/06/25 03:55 AM
2

Yes, because assuming it’s clearly a “woman’s thing” to participate in superstition, hucksterism, low-bar credulity, and arbitrary, self-contradictory anti-science… is totally respectful to women. In fact, it’s misogyny- hatred even- to suggest there are women who are above such things. No women would find actual science more compelling than horoscopes except the self-hating types! Is it also misogyny to mock men for indulging in magic thinking at the Santa-eligible stage of social awareness? Ap…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/25 09:19 PM
56

They've even built a whole rationalization to pretend misandry can't be sexism- "cuz we redefined hatred not to be". The KKK gets rightfully called out for trying to hide its hatred between the lines of "purity" and "pride", but somehow feminists don't get the same scrutiny for overt "kill all men." That said there was a recent hate vid done by a random misandrist mocking men's mental health month which got met by a lot of backlash. It wasn't exactly encouraging since, well, an apology or a pro-…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/06/25 05:46 AM
15

The use of a term like “erasure” in that second, fully bolded section is what shows how feminists take what was a reasonable premise and then apply hyperbole. “Yes, stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination happen… kinda like the derision we apply to you men things on an organized basis… but at least we’re (usually) not getting violent w you or erasing you, so therefore we’re not being sexist bigots.” Feminists have a phrase, however, called “decentering men” which very much entails recontextua…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 09:37 PM
18

Oligarchs: “Wait, so you’re going to ignore the fact that we’re the ones in power and instead apply our divide-and-conquer tactics between the sexes on your own?” Feminists: “Yeah! We’re bringing down the patriarchs! Those damn men should be put in their place!” Oligarchs: “Even poor men? Working class men? Men in education and health care? Bring those men down?” Feminists: “Yeah!” Oligarchs: “Cuz if you need funding or branding, we can always lend you a hand. Do you have any logos we can put on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 08:46 PM
14

Women are also not facing “institutionalized violence and systematic erasure,” so congrats, according to feminists, you’re not oppressed either, ladies! And since women and men comprise the sum total of all humans, that’s it: there’s no oppression in human society anywhere! No, the key to that reasoning isn’t in the meaningful distinctions they’re failing to make but in the behavior it’s intended to provide a mask for. It’s apologism for bigotry. “I can be an ass to you without empathy or consci…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/25 05:28 PM
1

That's not premise without applicability, just particularly well to what's going on w the Left these days, what the transformation of the Left entailed. It certainly wasn't a development directly from "hierarchy" requirements. If anything those were the effect, not the cause. The underlying cause is the widening economic disparity between the rich and the rest of us (feminists included). The wealthy Left has lost even a semblance of recognition that the working class was utterly fundamental to t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 05:23 PM
93

Mostly your characterization of the general assertions on this particular subreddit are flat-out incorrect, so I simply won't be answering to a strawman. The "common themes" here aren't quite so routinely banal, and if you haven't noticed the plethora of "meaningful conversations about how society as a whole fails boys and men", you simply weren't really looking. If "a lot of people" are "associating... men's health w red pill, right wing, violent, misogynistic ideology", why would that dissuade…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/06/25 07:06 AM
12

I used to consider him “smarter than that”, but now? I would indeed use the word “couched.” He introduced the male loneliness issue- quoting studies and pausing for dramatic effect as if empathetic- and from there launched into his lampoon of “manosphere” grift. He didn’t distinguish between the two: the presentation presumed a correlation and proceeded to denigrate men by that association in typical, routine feminist antagonism. It’s not even about him being “smart”: he just clearly is on that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 08:57 PM
19

His mockery of “bro influencers” (and men as a sex) was couched as his reply to studies about men feeling alienated. That alienation is not in the least a non-issue or non-serious to men’s issues. Sometimes humor is the setup to failure… as is Colbert’s underlying harmful ideology…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 06:58 PM
47

“Women- the ones w the boobs, hahaha- have been shown in legit recent studies to be feeling alienated in society. Then change your mascara color! Bwahaha. You sure you’re not just on the rag? Bwahaha. If only those teen romance novels and Taylor Swift lyrics were helping you. Bwahaha Amiright, guys??!” The only reasonable response is: “WTF is wrong w you?”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 06:53 PM
103

Nothing demonstrates concern about "Are Men OK?" like mocking indifference and strawmanned portrayals of men. I mean, it would be one thing if the entire sequence was just lampooning the "manosphere" grifters- clearly a lot to facepalm about- but he makes the lampoon his answer to men feeling misunderstood and lonely. Say, "Your feelings don't matter to me, bunch o' babies! hahaha" more clearly. It's essentially as stereotypical as the schoolyard bully going to the troubled kid in school and- in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 01:36 PM
14

Not sure what “right wing ideas” you mean- and even “gender segregation” (sex segregation, no?) doesn’t sound like a platform position or tendency of the Right. The Right has generally had the politics of giving the rich everything they want while the Left has had the politics of placating the masses w reforms or the promise thereof, and they continue that good cop/bad cop dance today. The difference in today’s political climate is that the Left has decided to play bad cop- at least regarding st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 04:50 AM
2

Pfffft. Those who can’t properly assess the situation we’re in end up being unwittingly part of the problem. I’m fully against disposability being applied to men as spelled out in the vid by Girlwriteswhat referenced in the OP video. As you should’ve recognized in my reply, Fattyboy_777. What I added was the deeper/higher perspective of someone actually in life-threatening situations daily. (Yesterday, for ex, I was required to navigate a dangerous ladder climb to access a discharge valve that w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 01:22 AM
21

I'm increasingly convinced- especially from viewing hate comments across a wide spectrum of social media- that the primary issue for the Left is the entrenchment of bigotry vs the straight white guy. It's far too pervasive to think it's just a self-defeating quirk of radical Lefties. It's a political error that's clearly not made explicit in the official platforms of any nation's Left parties, but it's a tendency that's largely already supplanted the original progressivism that favored the worki…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/25 06:03 PM
-3

“There is nothing strong in accepting your suffering…” Actually there is considerable strength in endurance of hardship or shouldering a responsibility- demonstrates character. That stoicism is why the antagonistic petulance of feminists regarding male disposability Someone needs to weld those beams together and do so according to proper procedure, and there’s no “protest” or “remedy” in that regard. Or the 1000s of other risky jobs that carry the risk regardless. There’s no shame in it- quite t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 10:35 PM
6

True, but a particularly low bar. At the very least it should be recognized that the nature of particular work/sacrifice warrants more than a name on the wall- more than gratitude alone. The compensation process though would immediately start to reflect a more class-based analysis since men in office work or playing at management aren’t the ones considered disposable except in the basic sense of the draft potential or how employment “isn’t a charity” and “no one’s irreplaceable.” Working class p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 09:48 PM
10

“The patriarchy” is an ideological error that enables misandry. “I don’t hate all you women, but I hate your matriarchy- you know, your power as women… since all women are powerful. I’m totally against the power of women- hate it! Want to destroy it! What? No, women are ok… but I hate anything that has to do w you. It oppresses me!” Yeah, not misandrist at all. It’s also one of the most archaic social structures that simply can’t apply to complex modern social infrastructure. Rich women have mor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 06:57 PM
1

Do the clueless ever really "get it" though? If they could, they wouldn't never be in a state of cluelessness. But I'll grant a concession this way- that despite operating from a baseless perspective of pure politics, the rich nitwits are nevertheless rich, and as a result they're not completely illogical: their cluelessness is a useful idiocy for the interests of the rich. Their politics derive from no longer being oriented toward working class priorities or interests and have largely moved awa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/25 03:07 AM
7

Trump won twice entirely due to the failures of the Dems rather than the appeal of the Reps. It’s the same ol’ tired apologism for the rich from the Reps, and w a candidate as incompetent as Trump both elections were entirely the Dems’ fight to lose… but they snatched defeat from the hands of victory anyway- twice. No one thought they could do it, but they’ve got gumption. And see? Didn’t need no man after all. I think I’ve cracked the syntax myself though. “Hi, bro. You bench over 100? Call of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 09:44 PM
1

Your repeated error is assuming that the behavior of feminist/misandrists determines the reality of masculinity. It doesn't: the bulk of men have the greater say on the social construct that represents them. People can malign as they like, but we can also think of ourselves as we like. Blacks have social constructs about "being black", Chinese have social constructs about "being Chinese", and men inevitably will have social constructs about "being men-" all based on our unique experience. The re…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 02:57 PM
13

Which party is out of touch? Both. As I said. You think the Dems don’t have “think” tanks also getting millions to fight the culture war? The whole USAID exposure kinda made that obvious. It wasn’t even just that it was happening, but that the Dems were choosing a war side that employs, enables, and funds misandry. This is anathema to anyone who’s devoted to human rights. To see the casual sexism and bigotry on the Left is just a deal breaker. It doesn’t make the Reps one iota better- and partic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/25 12:46 AM
11

What exactly? The improbable: stand up to the wealthy, propose and fight for working class gains without compromise. Essentially act like the unions are supposed to be doing on their own. But govt is there for big business like its HR department, so… we see the inevitable failure of the rich Left vs the rich Right. The article’s best line was the self-criticism buried way at the end: “Voters are hungry for people to actually stand up for them — or get caught trying,” she said. “The party is doin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 11:26 PM
16

I especially like the line regarding their new approach: “[We’re going to] study the syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces…” lol yeah… that’s how you’ve been failing men. You just weren’t going viral enough. If they can crack our code, they can say stuff like “Men are toxic by nature” and go viral in “men’s spaces.” As it is, the “I prefer a bear in the woods to a man” went ultra-viral in “men’s spaces”… and somehow it didn’t warm anyone to the Dems… wond…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 11:10 PM
13

“What we need is a better way to sell misandry to men… Any ideas?”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 11:04 PM
9

Yeah, there’s absolutely no lack of the presence of their “messaging” in the video game industry (and entertainment generally), and having even more such presence is definitely not going to help their case- quite the opposite. It’s a qualitative, not quantitative issue. They’ve got to rethink what they’re doing there…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 11:02 PM
5

I missed the correct vid- edited to include both…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 10:59 PM
14

This topic always reminds me of this vid by Shoe0nHead that came out before the 2024 election. Still haven’t found any Leftist self-criticism as hard-hitting regarding how the Dems failed. Spoiler- it’s largely from failing men: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSw04BwQy4M Then she came out w this one after the election that added more clarity… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkUkEvf7Ma4&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 10:47 PM
18

Dems do have a “messaging issue”, but it’s more of an effect than the cause. Their messaging proceeds directly from a place of general cluelessness. They’ve oriented toward a purely political (not economic) analysis of the current situation, reintroducing bigotry- ie, vs the straightwhiteguy boogeyman- and away from working class concerns which heavily affect men. They’re overwhelmingly rich nitwits in a historical juncture where wealth inequality is cripplingly conspicuous, so it’s not in any w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 10:39 PM
24

Your fundamental error is in assuming (like Dems themselves) that men asserting their interests is automatically a vote for the Reps. You’re quite correct that the Reps are like filling a gas tank w acid rather than fuel, and at least in much (definitely not all) rhetoric the Dems sound more reasonable, but you’re missing the reality that the Dems are nevertheless failing to reach men. That’s what’s being discussed here- not how Reps are better, but how Dems are fundamentally failing. Even the D…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 09:59 PM
1

Masculinity is made-up, yes, but it’s a male make-believe, not a notion that doesn’t reference maleness at all and is entirely imposed by non-males. Referring to blacks w the “n-word” doesn’t reference anything about them being black- moreso just waves an idiot flag by the user- but calling a man “masculine” does reference something fundamentally male. Men have a particular physicality and are overwhelmingly the ones in society handling the rougher, more dangerous work, so masculinity- a social …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 08:59 PM
3

"Because, in my XP..." Yes, but are you Level 5 yet? (kidding) No, it comes down to men's treatment as expendable. Men being overly emotional means they're less likely to simply stoically accept their lot in life as the ones chucked into war or dangerous jobs or death risk by protecting the women and children. Or they're less effective at it. How does anyone accept such a "role" without sublimating a lot of mixed emotions to simply "do what I gotta do"? The age-old reality of women needing to be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 05:06 PM
4

It'll come down to a matter of overriding universal concerns taking precedence- generally economic- or, yeah, we'll keep being divided. Depends on a lot of factors, but especially how invested people are in careers devoted to the divisiveness. The "divide and conquer" strategy has been working for the rich for centuries more or less, but until "living and thriving together" becomes the material cause people prefer over "don't need no man" or "I'd rather meet a bear in the woods", we're doing the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 04:52 AM
6

I don't think the idea of making less out of gender is deranged at all, but a de-escalation of gender hyperbole is not what a term like "abolition" is about in that context. But you're totally onto something regarding the "consistently wealthy." I mean, no, the economies of Western nations have been getting steadily worse over the last five decades, but for sure "nonbinary" and "gender abolition" concerns are perfect examples of "first world problems." Billions in the rest of the world are just …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 04:43 AM
18

At first I thought, "Gender abolition... Oh, so we're just going to stop w the 'gender identifications' altogether now. Great. Just be a human being, right? Nice and simple. Just be yourself, and don't sweat the whole arbitrary 'gender' assignment process on everything. For once a genuinely constructive-" But then experience w society kicked in and I had to question... how can that otherwise utterly reasonable proposition instead be manifested sociopathically and asininely? Because that's usuall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 04:32 AM
1

It’s a question of what’s being called out as an issue. I’m no expert on “TERFs” (had to look it up), but a former and long-time opponent of the RF errors. When the RFs came into the atheist movement in the 2010s declaring it an issue that atheists weren’t all radical feminists, this was how I stopped being RF: atheists should welcome any who don’t believe in a deity, not require demonstrable RF political posturing. It’s a bit surprising to me that RFs would ever be TE, but it’s not interesting:…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 10:59 PM
3

Wick is still pretty bland- at least once his "return to the life" arc was complete. The first movie was more interesting- struggling w the relationship he'd had and lost, his dog meaning a lot more to him than just "being a dog guy", his "return" a matter of a compelling character arc rather than a formulaic action hero identity. Same w the first Bourne movie: it's all about him handling his situation to protect someone else, keeping cool in an increasingly out-of-control scenario, w a lot of h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 05:16 PM
6

Generally it's nowadays these categories: joke (butt-of-the-joke) characters and (not mentioned above) villains/antagonists/creeps and "expendables" (the type to get killed on-screen). The "idealized good guy" and "lovable underdog"- and obviously "horny/not horny comic relief"- are all emasculated joke characters who take insults either without recognizing/appreciating the deprecation or completely embracing it. You look at how they handle large Jason Momoa in Minecraft- dressed in pink and 100…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 03:18 PM
6

I went to check out more vids by that interviewer- also quite interesting. He seems familiar w the dynamics of Western feminism and yet isn’t trying to disseminate it despite asking random Japanese people on the street about it. Questions that flair up to absurd divisiveness in the West were going over like light questions of philosophy instead. There’s no active social orientation toward sex division, so nothing was met w polarization and hyperbole- instead was just a matter of sorting through …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 01:54 AM
107

Wait, none of them trying to "score points" against men? That dynamic isn't a constant "culture war" between men and women in Japan? It almost sounds like they would prefer meeting a man in the woods rather than a bear. "Sometimes men work so hard they can barely make it home at the end of the day, and I wouldn't want that myself. Maybe they need a woman to come home to." Her feminist reprogramming is malfunctioning! Someone fix her! Best comment was from the nurse who said pretty much nothing t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 02:23 PM
5

Gender is a largely superfluous social construct. Its discussion tends to immediately bore me. Is being compassionate good? Then be a compassionate human being. Do you feel like racing up that hiking trail? Just run up it. Your wife dies and the tears start coming- whatever- you cry. You're a human being first and foremost, so why bother w... "But what would a REAL man/woman do?" If the goal isn't people just being themselves, then there's something wrong w the formula. This is also why I detest…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/25 05:54 PM
21

I had a recent insight that the absurd “patriarchy” paintbrush actually does have a logic: unappreciative, ingrate women who hate men likely “feel oppressed” by men because despite their hatred they need us. Even rich women need us. Who makes, transports, stocks all the clothes they want to buy? Who builds the buildings they want to decorate w feminist signs? Who mines the ores, ships them, forms them, assembles them in factories, and ships the final Toyota Prius (or whatever) to the auto showro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 10:02 PM
18

So it’s ok to have inequality that favors women because men can be killed off without affecting population resurgence. First, this means feminists consider the draft not about everyone “serving the nation” but about sacrificing whatever men are required. If they don’t want women to “assimilate” into a society (“cuz oppression!”) then why should men be sacrificed to defend them? And they also shouldn’t have access to anything men create through the labor women don’t do in order to “not assimilate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 09:40 PM
7

I've noticed this for years in movies: that they rarely incorporate people w real jobs (except as joke characters) and nearly always laud the rich. It's the rich making the movies, and they very well may have no experience having low-to-average wealth, but they also likely prefer movies about themselves. The "average" man is represented as lesser due to their lack of income. Since women also have an option of being able to live off of men's income, they have a similar experience of not having to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/25 03:10 PM
25

“Good dog! Now go fetch!” It does have a patronizing edge, yes… Checked out the song though. The opening lines show how the girlfriend/singer views her bf: He’s a phone call to his parents He’s a bible by the bed He’s the t-shirt that I’m wearing He’s a song stuck in my head He’s solid and he’s steady like the Allegheny runs He knows just where he’s going And he’s proud of where he’s from One of the good ones He’s one of the good ones So he’s not really a person, just something fulfilling a func…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/25 09:07 PM
2

It’s not so much a matter of the “extremes” though. The rampant, sociopathic bigotry we see in the entertainment industry that seems so intent on maligning and devaluing men… is put out by rich Lefties. And that’s as “mainstream” as you get- at least if you recognize that it’s the rich that rule. The rich Left feel content to antagonize and thumb their nose at /eyeroll/ “MEN- pfft.” The rich truly don’t have to make social progress work or even simply make/keep it sustainable, so there’s no ince…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 09:17 PM
2

Or as they said it in Aesop’s time: “Sour grapes!” They need us. Just think of the work that men perform in society. Can women do pretty much any job men can do? Arguably. But are they clambering to be steel workers, coal miners, factory maintenance, oil rig operators, sanitation workers, etc.? No one’s stopping them from trying for those jobs, and, when they consistently don’t, they manifestly take it for granted that men will then be the ones to do that work. “That’s for men to do.” Ok, so the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/25 08:33 PM
1

I mean, she’s just stating what women really should’ve been stating all along instead of handling men’s experiences adversarially. “Guys actually look out for us- even kinda selflessly and sometimes to their own detriment. Whoda thunk it?” But as I mentioned already in my opening sentence, even w the potential for patronization/taking our “sentinel” tendencies for granted, her position is at the very least not vitriolic misandry. And TBH I found her on YT a while back- maybe a year or two ago wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 07:22 PM
20

This has been the fundamental social exploit that the Right has been using to gain the support of those that would never otherwise have swung to them. It's an exploit especially of the tendency of most people to view the false dichotomy of the Right and Left political parties as the only solution. When the Left fails- in this case failing men (but there've been multiple fronts they're now failing on)- the Right then appears like the only or best alternative- or simply a temporary counter which m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 02:25 PM
1

The context for my use of "anti-West" involves Putin being quite against ALL the West. You dispute this? Putin is secretly the Ukraine's best buddy and the whole war there is secretly about being mean exclusively to the US? No, Putin is anti-West. He's been trying to bring down NATO and the rest of Europe for decades- ever since Gorbachev was trying to broker a less tumultuous end to the USSR. So, no, I didn't mean ONLY anti-American. And Putin is anything but anti-imperialist. "The West" is jus…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 01:06 PM
1

Also a good point. Even if the youngest of teen boys actually thought of himself that way and started articulating the "incel" movement's political positions, the state isn't going to be providing ANY man a wife, much less a 13yr old. It's not a teenager's sociopathy AFAIK. But, as mentioned, the kid didn't do any of that anyway. Instead "incel" was being used incessantly by the girl harassing him on social media- maybe in class- to mock him for being "ugly" and thus not having a girlfriend. (Th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/25 12:57 PM
5

We weren’t designated as the cannon fodder sector of society in a process of warmly cozying up to us. Even as society (in more affluent Western areas) has adopted a plethora of technologies that reduce strain in employment and daily rigor and adopted a plethora of psychological and emotional support mechanisms, the rich haven’t abandoned war as an option, so we continue to face a similar treatment as the disposable tools they use as a means to an end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/25 07:03 PM
2

Fair enough, and I didn’t actually stop my analysis at that impression, but I was more just recognizing the implications of her approach given how she was describing it, and the jest wrote itself. “Brainless” was her word, not mine.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 09:37 PM
4

Yes, that was exactly my impression as I went from, “OK, good, you’re doing a great job of conspicuously undoing your feminist ‘programming’” to… “You want to be a brainless nitwit while men keep you from chewing your arms off? Wait…”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 08:51 PM
19

Toxic positive masculinity: the new feminist invention. XD
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 08:44 PM
20

You’re right. She’s essentially articulating a backpedal position from misandry into potential ingratiation. It’s a relatively better (less decisively obnoxious) position because it’s at least tacitly appreciative of men’s tendency toward being protective. But it does toe the line of taking men’s protectiveness for granted as the one expected to remain eternally vigilant while women “brainlessly” (as she put it) skip about. It can end up being patronizing AF like a soldier being thanked “for the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 08:35 PM
8

Sociopaths always look for avenues they can exploit where their sociopathy is conducted in a sort of blind spot. Men are already seen as disposable and the ones to sacrifice over women and children- plus we’re the ones expected to “just take it” in wars, dangerous/rough employment, etc- so going that extra step of just assuming men should suffer insults as well is an easy step for a sociopath to take. Feminists already claim there’s a “rape culture” where all men are to be seen as “potential rap…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 07:12 PM
20

She lost me as soon as she introduced her vid regarding "Adolescence" as "Who is responsible for boys falling down the manosphere pipeline?" I saw "Adolescence." That fictional story does have an off-hand remark from one character to Tate, but it in no way involves the "manosphere" (which she spells out without quotes as if it's a thing). It dealt w why a particular kid would turn to violence to resolve his issue w a girl bullying him for being "ugly" and calling him an "incel." The last episode…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/25 03:00 PM
9

Reminds me of the feminist line that the wives back home suffer the most in war. Death, being maimed, losing limbs, losing hearing/sight, losing comrades, shellshock trauma- sure, OK, but that isn't REAL suffering, amiright? What about raising children?! OUCH!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 12:35 AM
15

Kids are dependents. How are they supposed to fight back against an irrational parent who might just chuck them to an orphanage or worse- particularly a parent that’s already put abuse on the table? A parent bully isn’t the same as a playground bully that one can potentially “be a man” (be violent) against. Parents generally hold all the cards, and the worst ones go out of their way to make sure you know they do. Even a teenager who’s 6’8” isn’t immune to that power dynamic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/25 09:31 PM
2

It’d be more of a sex war. It hasn’t been people who “opt” to be men who overwhelmingly end up the ones in wars, prisons, dangerous and rough jobs, suiciding etc, or who are fathers denied custody or falsely accused of rape. It’s only the male sex that has endured it. So, yes, any “gender war” should be abandoned/avoided as frivolous. But, yes, absolutely the men’s movement should avoid misogyny or an absurd sex-based view of socioeconomic reality. If feminists (not necessarily women) prefer big…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/04/25 09:25 PM
1

That’s worth articulating. It’s not as if women have been queens all along, even if contemporary feminists have adopted a self-effacing emphasis on “microaggressions”. You see utterly cruel treatment of women today in the part of the world dominated by Islam, and the US removal of abortion rights is flat out anti-women. The men’s movement doesn’t win merely by competing better in the Oppression Olympics but by presenting a more comprehensive assessment of the human condition that uncompromisingl…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 07:42 PM
3

It shows the overwhelming pivot of feminism away from the working class roots of the progressive movement. That “bottom” tier is comprised of both the group driving society and the infrastructure and the ones failing in the economy the worst, and that tier is the vast bulk of society. That men dominate (not 100%) in that tiny top fraction just bugs them because they think that women should be there instead, but “elites” are elites. Meanwhile women are bypassing the “bottom” tier jobs of learning…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/25 07:24 PM
1

There's a midget comedian Brad Williams I've been seeing on YouTube who clearly has had his height issues in life. I got nothing but respect for him keeping the sense of humor he has about his condition. He doesn't require anyone to pretend he's tall, but instead tells a lot of jokes about the human condition of being a "little people", and it works on me. Yes, I know he has no biological dissonance where his brain is telling him he's 6'5", but that's irrelevant to the analogy. The point is that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 07:36 AM
1

As to my analogy w breast implants, it in no way fails as you mischaracterize it. It wasn't the statement of an equivalent. An analogy is illustrative on a particular axis, and the axis wasn't merely on how both involve expensive cosmetic surgery which would be an oversimplification. The axis there was comparing: a woman w breast implants who insists that everyone around them refer to her implanted boobs as natural breasts v a trans ("transitioned" surgically or otherwise) who insists that every…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 07:33 AM
1

The core of your assertions requires subverting, not asserting science. Biology is one science, psychology or the social sciences are another. Sex is biology. Gender is psychological or a "social construct." There's no amount of neuroscience that divorces sex from biology, even if there's plenty of "personal comfort comfirmation" in more artistic interpretations of reality. The brain is physical, not a "social construct", so if there's going to be evidence there, it's only going to be footnotes …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/25 07:32 AM
1

And yet another trans post in a male advocacy forum… The OP’s OP (which really isn’t the OP comment from wherever it derives) does make some poor attempts to put contemporary trans issues into perspective- ie, good idea to try, but, no, sex dysphoria isn’t a matter of sexuality but of sex. The issue trans have is w their brains telling them that they’re the opposite sex while the rest of their body contradicts it- and trying to manage that contradiction. It’s also true that misandrists are likel…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 11:25 PM
1

A better reflection on that would be this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=yQGWa-aSTUk It's a look at an old viral vid about a "transitioned" woman who discovers how it is to be treated as a man, how it's not just fun times and "privilege" and a lot colder than she'd anticipated. She could barely articulate the "cis white men" BS (trying to pose as one after all) given her new experiences. I mean, if you're bringing trans "questions" to the male advocacy subreddit, this discovery by …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 09:29 AM
0

"Very little trans identity politics on the left..." You just brought it yourself... to a subreddit about men. The Right didn't do that. You did. You've right here yourself provided yet another perfectly demonstrable example that it isn't the Right keeping it going. And this tendency emerges from contemporary Left politics, not those of the progressive Left of yesteryear. The reality is that I never would have waded into the subject of trans "identity" at all if it hadn't been made a "thing" far…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/25 09:26 AM
0

No, it's called doing your research and only asserting from defensible positions. Your own presumptuousness in the OP post derives from the same errors the Left is losing elections from, but it gets tedious trying to talk people down from insisting on dying on a hill needlessly... particularly on a subreddit where it's already explicitly devoted to addressing a different issue where the Left is failing... As Leftist comedian Steve Hofstetter said, "I don't have to know a thing about piloting a h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 05:59 PM
-2

Nope, didn't make that assumption at all- why I added the "superiority" part regarding your wording in particular- i.e., loving oneself more for being one sex rather than the other. You're the same person, not more than you were. But if you did proceed w "transition" due to dysphoria, "alleviated" sounds a lot more accurate than "more lovable." In that case, yes, suffering does have a tendency to diminish a person and limit one's ability to appreciate life. That's different than saying that bein…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 06:38 AM
0

You actually “love yourself more fully for being a man and your body as a trans male”? This begs a lot of questions about misogyny among women who choose or advocate to others for trans “options”. Dysphoria is one thing. Self-loathing is another. Or simple “superiority of” lingo regarding a sex or race. This is why the history of trans acceptance (already underway several decades ago) included more severe screening for surgery options, better ensuring that people weren’t essentially self-harming…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 01:25 AM
1

The main error w your political recommendation is in overlooking the reality that bigotry is not the province of one side or another. It was simply historically tolerated by the Right regarding non-straightwhitemen. That the bigotry is now anti-straightwhitemen (or specific elements of the three) does not make it rightwing. It simply makes it extremist and divisive. “Divide and conquer” isn’t a tactic employed only by one side, just by a “side” that can make use of it. At present there’s a whole…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 11:37 PM
2

I’d only poise contention of your analogy w “true communism” because as a social system communism is supposed to be demarcated by specific components: capital and commoditization gone, “value” tied entirely to social need, etc. In that way even if someone’s got rose-colored Stalin/Mao glasses on, the reality that it’s not true communism remains in the wage slavery proof pudding. There’s a very specific systematic endgame of communism that one fails on if it’s not achieved, and it’s by that ultim…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 10:54 PM
7

Yes, the association of communism w the Left has long been an erroneous distraction used by both Left and Right. The furthest Right capitalism goes is into fascist dictatorship, but the furthest Left capitalism goes (and capitalism tends right, so it tends not to happen) is into state capitalist monopoly that would either be a bureaucratic cesspool or Stalinist nightmare (or both). Which also begs the question of whether one side can ever be wholly, fundamentally better than the other since thei…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 10:32 PM
6

If the Left were sufficiently vigilant against sociopathy in any form, there would be no exploits by sociopaths of any type. The Left for sure has adopted a sociopathic tendency of bigotry vs men, particularly straight white men. It’s an Achilles heel for the Left as long as it remains tolerated. But there may very well be impostors posing as Leftists to act poorly and make the Left appear worse than it would be otherwise. It’s no hidden fact that Putin- who has long been anti-West and actively …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/25 09:32 PM
2

Feminism these days finds itself supporting hardline rightwing Islamists (in the erroneous name of anti-racism regarding a religion), but its general radical tendency is ultraleftist- supporting useless terrorism (by Islamists, but also) like vehicle vandals, rioters wrecking and looting their own communities, doxing people and threatening people who don’t share their views against Freedom of Speech, violently or nonviolently disrupting speakers at college campuses. What they do- including their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 07:03 AM
4

"Pro-male ideologies" are a tad more varied than that. Not all are the equivalent of feminist wamenz-apologism, making up their own toxic superiority rhetoric. For sure being "pro-male" shouldn't be an ideology in itself any more than should be viewing the world as a sex divide w women as preferred: it should be part of being pro-human which includes both women and men. For me it's about genuine equality, making sure humanity's varied nature is accurately accounted for. Feminists actively deny a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 05:43 PM
2

I'm not sure you can find one in the same way that, say, Hamas is explicitly anti-semitic having in its founding charter the goal of destroying Israel and Jews. Any org that intends to "destroy the patriarchy" is talking fantasy land, so misandry in an org's intent would be a matter of explicitly advocating negative outcomes for men. That said, it's true that a KKK-type group might describe its intention as "advancing the cause of white pride" or some such when in reality its practice is that of…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 04:46 PM
3

That stat is not showing that women are winning the loneliness Olympics. It’s showing that men and women are nearly equally lonely. That’s what should give people pause: that divisiveness in society has had a noticeable impact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/25 02:34 AM
1

“Dog eat dog” competition is the cruel social basis undermining everyone’s relationship to others- that peppered w “divide and conquer” tactics from those in power. Given that we’re also the ones expected to be “breadwinners”, die/kill in war, work the dangerous jobs, and throw ourselves in front of bullets to protect others, it makes relationships w others a bit more tenuous. We don’t have the commonality of griping about how cruel a fate housework and childrearing are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/25 08:43 PM
4

Ultimately you just talk sense and reality. Magically men tend to listen to that… like every other reasonable human being. Whoda thunk it? I work in industry- have noticed a recent trend in them hiring women who’ve never worked alongside us or even in industry for management/engineering/QA positions over us. That’s not going to go well at making women “listened to”, just endured like any other boss that’s clueless about how the plant actually runs. And it really depends on what it is they think …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/25 08:24 PM
4

They actually started at the 11th hour of the Prez campaign trying to placate men as if a foreign group they don't understand, using Tim Walz as what ShoeOnHead called "the first straight white guy DEI hire", parading him out as a man-whisperer who likes sports and fixes cars. But that was in itself a confession: they were so out of touch w men- particularly working class men- that they required some sort of interpreter. Meanwhile they were feeding everyone the "patriarchy" myth that men are the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 12:55 AM
11

It’s not just that you’re not crazy for resenting the anti-male bigotry on the Left. That bigotry needs to be eliminated on the Left for self-preservation purposes. So long as that bigotry is tolerated, the Left remains paralyzed politically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/25 01:14 AM
2

At its basis it’s ad hominem: even if you 100% qualify as such, the points you’re making might also be 100% correct.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/25 06:57 PM
4

Just watched "Adolescence" myself- found it to be an oddly disjointed depiction of a particular fictional case. Being a British TV series, of course it overrepresented white guys as fools, criminal, callous, and cruel and everyone else (especially women) as relatively reasonable, but it showed its hand by mentioning Andrew Tate in conjunction w the "incel" tendency since they're not the same at all. Obviously they don't mind lumping white guys into a single camp (and gassing us), but the Tate gu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 06:54 PM
3

The vid does a sloppy and ineffective job of providing a counter-point to the genuine concerns men have w the Left- particularly straight white men. It tries to distinguish between the “woke” ultraleftists and “progressives”, portraying the former as fringe and low hanging fruit, but fails to account for how mainstream that “fringe” has become. The entertainment industry in particular is rife w emasculation and the demonization/denigration of the evil straightwhiteguy, and DEI is rife across wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/25 02:57 PM
7

It’s a more fundamental social transition than just Interwebs algorithms. The Left has lost the script they used to have. Instead of being champions of anti-discrimination and advancing the living standards of the poor and working class, they now orient toward antagonizing straight white guys, emphasizing “microaggesssions”. The “green” movement hasn’t turned out any genuinely sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels, the unions are full of microagressing, politically-incorrect men, and special …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/25 02:32 PM
19

Academic Convolution Careerism 101 term paper
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/25 07:10 PM
23

It’s not “just you,” but that doesn’t make it a meaningful take. It’s a pure strawman argument to characterize the position as: “‘ugly’ for not bringing ultra sexualized and appealing to the male gaze.” No one is arguing for “ultra-sexualization”, so… And the “male gaze” is a very odd demonstration of ignorance about lesbians and bisexuals of both sexes: only straight women and gay guys don’t share the same “gaze”, and it’s been shown repeatedly that straight women choose tend to choose hotter c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/25 07:19 PM
1

It's about working class people, not just men: it certainly doesn't apply to "fat cat" guys, and there are women who "toil night and day" in "factories and mills" and all else mentioned including war... It's simply also the case that it's overwhelmingly and primarily men in the military, dying in wars and "counting the dead" men in them, and overwhelmingly and primarily men working the most dangerous and strenuous jobs while valued only for our "use". It's also why this song resonates so much mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/25 04:33 AM
3

Being anti-men isn’t feminist. It’s just misandry. But the feminist movement has indeed adopted it as more of a central platform. Terms like “feminism” don’t arise from nature in the sense of being able to simply consult the biochemistry of the plantus feminismi flower to see if it’s genuinely part of the same phylum. The movement determines what it is from its demonstrable focus and efforts- regardless of the label it bears or even necessarily the rhetoric it employs. Modern feminists are large…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/25 10:18 PM
1

Like most of the causes of the past, once they've been won and a new zeitgeist paved, the adherents feel they should now occupy permanent careers in it regardless of need or even virtue. Feminists were looking for the right to vote, abortion rights, equal access to all careers and other social opportunities (college, etc), equal pay... and won them all. Then the career feminists decided that the movement wasn't about social equality and advancing human rights but rather about crass women's advoc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 04:24 PM
17

The reintroduction of accepted bigotry into the Left- decades after they'd been the go-to standard bearers of egalitarianism, humanism, and empathy- is the achilles heel weighing them down and lending the Right far more credibility on the ground of anti-bigotry than they'd otherwise have. What confidence can anyone have- much less men- in a political tendency that demonizes and antagonizes them as if a principle? The rationalizations- "patriarchy", "toxic masculinity", etc- make no difference if…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/25 07:56 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter