TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bible_and_a_Gun Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by Bible_and_a_Gun on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Now you're just being pedantic. What I said originally was true: men used to be much less tolerant of THEIR women running around town. Some other man's woman? No, they probably didn't care all that much. Their wife and their daughter and their sister? Fuck no, they weren't typically letting them go out drinking with men, or hanging out alone with men, or doing a whole host of things that women do now. Take your average feminist back to 1870 and marry her off to some farmer in Colorado and see if…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/19 10:27 AM
1

Respectable married women would absolutely go out and have quilting parties or whatever with their friends. Yes, because that is exactly the same thing as going out to a bar/club and getting drunk. Respectable young women would gather at one another's houses (sometimes even with young men present!) under adult supervision. Once again, the exact same thing as going out to a club, getting drunk, and dancing with strangers. The exact same thing. And disrespectable women, such as whores, went out dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/19 08:24 AM
1

Yes, even in the West. Not to the degree that other cultures did, but definitely more than now. In the 1890s the idea that a woman would go out drinking with "the girls" would ba so foreign as to probably excite no small amount of scandal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 11:03 PM
7

Tastes do evolve, but the fact is that women are generally sexually attracted to attractive men. And for a woman, attraction is almost universally toward taller, stronger, more virile men. Women are also less able to resist sexual advances (due to decreased reasoning abilities and increased attention from the opposite sex). This is why men kept their women squirreled away throughout history. Also women are much more critical in rating men than men are in rating women, and much more likely to men…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/19 11:07 AM
1

she's not great looking, but whatever. plenty good looking for a lot of guys.
/r/MGTOW03/06/19 10:10 AM
6

Hardcore cope. Simps and betas don't care about censorship or free speech. They only care about their speech. 99% of them are more than happy when dissident voices get shut down.
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 06:40 AM
1

Well the dispensation is implied. I suppose you could argue that there never was a dispensation at all and the Patriarchs/Kings were actually committing adultery, but most theologians would disagree. We assume there was a general dispensation because we read of no real condemnation of the behavior. We do see, however, that every single time a man took multiple wives it led to trouble, culminating in Solomon's betrayal and the conquest of Israel. As for Jesus ending the dispensation: Mark 10: 6-8…
/r/MGTOW29/05/19 03:17 AM
1

The old rule "didn't count" because there was a dispensation. Jesus ended the dispensation. Not seeing how this is difficult to understand. Perhaps you didn't read the part where he said if you even look lustfully at a woman who is not your wife then you have committed adultery.
/r/MGTOW28/05/19 05:41 AM
1

Well, no. King David had 900 concubiness roughly 700-1000 years before Christ was born. And, as we see with every other instance of polygamy in the Old Testament, it led to trouble. As I said before: there was a dispensation to the rule that was generally in effect before Christ came. When Christ came, he ended the dispensation permanently. Thr rule was always "one man, one wife" but there was a general dispensation. Just like the rukr was always "no divorce" but God had given a dispensation (th…
/r/MGTOW25/05/19 10:25 PM
1

Also we are not producers. We are consumers. That's why most people live paycheck to paycheck and the entire world is in debt. We consume more than we produce and pass the bill onto the unborn.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:13 PM
1

The purpose of school is not to educate. It is to train the masses to be a docile consumer, and to destroy those who don't fit into that system.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:11 PM
1

Well all of that is part of it, but that's really not the whole of it. Those are just products, but I am talking about the philosophy as a whole, the entire system. Which does include the products. I'm talking about the atomized man going to a corporate school for his one-size-fits-all education, then going to a one-size-fits-all job punchinf numbers, then going home to his one-size-fits-all apartment with his cheap furniture, where he will consume product until he sleeps only to wake up and do …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 08:01 PM
1

Matthew 19 Luke 16 Mark 10 He says in the beginning God made them man and woman (one of each) and that they cleave to each other and become one. He also outlaws divorce.
/r/MGTOW25/05/19 07:54 PM
1

Lol. No. Modern consumerism was invented to make a lot of... people... a lot of money. And very immediately the corporate overlords realized theh could squeeze a lot more blood from the stone by getting women out of the home and into the workplace. There is also a social aspect to it, as in they had a social goal in taking mothers out of the homes, but the economic one is just as important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:45 PM
1

You're thinking economic collectivism, not social. Also it seems like you're not really understanding what I mean by "machine world."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/19 07:42 PM
1

The fuck should I be shaming this dude for doing what he loves and not giving a fuck? What, he plays video games? So the fuck what? Am I a woman? Fuck do I care if this dude plays video games. He's a dork? Okay, but some thirsty ass fool making jokes on Tinder so he can have sex with a disease-ridden hole is not a dork? Tearing men down using bullshit stereotypes that women gave you. Real fucking MGTOW. Faggots.
/r/MGTOW24/05/19 10:37 AM
2

The Catholic Answer: In the beginning marriage was between one man and one woman, and all sexual activity was to be done in the marriage. However, because men (as in mankind) had hard-hearts they were given dispensations. Jesus got rid of the dispensation and established the sacramental marriage. Think of it like this, you have kids and you tell them "the rule is, no eating on the couch" but then one day you're watching a movie and you say "I will allow you to eat some snacks on the couch as lon…
/r/MGTOW24/05/19 09:53 AM
1

No. The feminine is not driven toward corporatism because the classically feminine behavior is to stay in the home, not enter the workforce. The classically feminine behavior is ordered toward consumption, yes, but that is different than consumerism. Consumerism is working a full-time job so you can afford to buy corporate products to signal on social media. Does this mean that no woman pre-Industrial Revolution ever was a materialist, or ever wasted her husband's money? Of course not. But it do…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 09:25 AM
1

Fathers are more important than mothers for long-term development. Fathers also tend to be the "better" parent. However, at this point it is generally tying to distinguish between really nasty shit and normal shit. It's all shit either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 07:23 AM
8

Because "masculine" interests (I notice that, in line with modern society, you define "masculine" pretty effectively as "retarded and useless" but I digress) are generally more fun. Whereas feminine interests are generally more boring. This is in line with the typical patterns, men are more interesting, funnier, and well... just more fun, in general, than women. Also society tends to push the "this girl is awesome because she is just like one of the guys!" meme pretty hard. Most movies that feat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 07:11 AM
1

The idea that a person has to study hard at all to graduate school with an upper level GPA is hilarious. Anyone with an above average IQ can dominate modern school curriculum by putting in a few hours a week, if that. The problem is the homework, but honestly, develop a good work ethic and scheduling habits and you can bust out homework in an hour or two. ​ The reason people have the "study so hard" is because women are generally less intelligent than men, and they are usually the ones who are d…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 06:46 AM
1

Catholic teaching is that either spouse should be ready to allow sexual access to their body pretty much whenever the other spouse wants it. The times when refusal is not sinful are relatively rare (in public, during days of abstinence, when there are more important tasks like a baby is crying, etc.) We literally call it "the marital debt" as in sex on demand is something you owe your spouse and they have the right to demand it. There is no such thing as marital rape. A guy might be a jerk for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/19 03:19 AM
11

How should you answer? I don't know. Are you looking to get laid or are you looking to actually explain it? Assuming the second, this is how I would answer: ​ "See this is the problem, you are expecting me to talk to you "like I would talk to a friend" but some random girl is not my friend. My friend is a loser just like me who likes to play video games and talk shit about stuff no woman could give a fuck about. More importantly, my friend is interesting and can hold up his end of the conversati…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/19 07:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter