TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Big-Quality3817 Archive

View 7 posts and 287 comments by Big-Quality3817 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Her job as a Russian asset is leading Useful Idiots into doing Stupid Things, convincing the American Electorate that the blue side is a bunch of sillyasses who can't be trusted with the 'keys'. I'm hoping the DOJ gets her-they've REALLY close to getting her fellow Squadie Cori Bush who was pretty clearly recruited into politics at the behest of an African "socialist" collaborating with an indicted Russian spy.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 01:09 AM
1

It's difficult to be completely right or wrong.....but I'll also note that there are different kinds of 'risk' too, e.g. couple years ago I almost had to put an elbow upside the head of a 'white knight' after a girl flirted with me to get drinks bought for her and a couple of her friends. Soon as she got them I was "stalking" her. The thing I brought up above (exponential defenses)was more "general" btw, not so much oriented to the "cold approach"....I don't believe it's an exaggeration that 80+…
/r/MensRights08/09/22 12:04 AM
1

Well OK.....you take my point at least. No one person's perspective (including my own) fully represents "reality" Depending on 'Appalachia' (not sure where that intersects 'Midwest'-PA, OH?) , people in general tend to be more polite and friendly in the American South. Also there is kind of a quirky thing with 'little guys'....A LOT of girls will fuck you very quickly because you're not much bigger than they are and not as much of a threat as an average/"big guy". I've 3-4 times over the years h…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:39 PM
1

I'm sure this comment is well intended, but you're over-generalizing your personal experience. We don't know for example if you are underestimating your own looks, whether or not your tastes run to women that most people don't consider attractive (e.g. a friend of mine LOVES 'big girls' despite himself looking like a male model), what part of the world you are in, and how successful you are actually connecting with the women you 'try' with. It could be for example that you are a scary looking 6'…
/r/MensRights07/09/22 11:20 PM
1

I've actually seen like 3 female commenters this week calling out "have your cake and eat it" bullshit double standards.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 06:42 PM
3

Bye
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/22 05:12 PM
2

Heh, I just came up with that. Had a conversation a couple days ago where someone correctly asserted that American women are encouraged to 'primacy' in their 'feelings', even down to the lyrics in "Frozen"...essentially they actually believe that "I say so"="It IS so". Further beyond that, few of them have the capacity to structure a "case" that should have gotten them out of middle school composition class...hence the 'smart off and block'. To be fair a lot of men have this problem too...
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:29 PM
1

As I constantly point out, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. I'm not condoning violence, but where the fuck do they think that these school shooters are coming from? 'Un-wifed' males have a tendency to get violent and commit crimes. It's inevitably the guy at the bottom of the mating hierarchy that under current conditions (his "low grade" correlate accessing MUCH "higher grade" men than she should be able to get as other women cluster around the "hot boys" ) .......... ......has …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:41 PM
-10

Yet oddly Margret Atwoods book was comprised of a compilation of things that had happened in the world.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:19 PM
20

I once EVER so politely and respectfully suggested to a girl online that the guy she was bitching about liking her (sounded like he had a rough life, maladjusted, probably on the verge of losing it) , was deserving of at least some kindness and compassion as she rejected him. MASSIVE 'henpile'...one little twat even had the temerity to say to me "You are MAKING WOMEN UNCOMFORTABLE" as though they literally had the right to be insulated from hearing anyone else's dissenting viewpoint. I managed t…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:01 AM
19

With you getting a blast of seeing what the 'crazy' looks like, may I politely suggest that it actually is strongly in reasonable women's interest to "smack down" abuses like what you witnessed.....I'm sure you're intelligent enough to understand that pendulums swing, and every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The "blowback" that is building up is on course to look like "Handmaids"....unless it gets 'moderated"....and women have A LOT of power to call out another women's bullshit. Heh …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:54 AM
13

TLDR but you wrote all that so I upvoted. Fight the power
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:45 AM
2

Right...hence the point of my post.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:21 AM
1

-actually here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wv677h/backlash\_against\_sexpositive\_feminism\_rising/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:11 AM
2

If it's any consolation, we're WAY overdue for a backlash....look in my stuff, I've written about even at least one feminist writer who thinks so, agreeing with her also female author "cultural trend predictor" friend" .
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:09 AM
24

Sounds like you're experiencing the wonders of hypergamy (it's primate behavior) where 80% of men who aren't "most sexy" are basically invisible or exploitation fodder (money, physical labor, one-way emotional support...)......as they shamelessly throw themselves at the super hot guys giving it up quick and easy as they know 5 other girls will do it if they don't. I'm kinda hoping that abortion and contraception go completely illegal for unmarried women so they risk a pregnancy giving out "free …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 01:01 AM
37

Here's an idea. Since it's clearly proven that a huge percentage of women are batshit crazy, self-serving liars etc., why don't we go back to "Innocent until PROVEN guilty." With big and serious evidence like video, sworn testimony from an unbiased witness... While we're at it, let's make "consent" something like voluntarily and alone entering an enclosed or isolated space outside of duties of work and the like. I personally don't view that as any more unreasonable than what is starting to be pr…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 12:21 AM
4

"Traditional liberal" values are in support of equality and opposed to hypocrisy. Intellectual integrity demands support of those values EVERYWHERE, not just applying to people you like and agree with.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:55 PM
40

Heh, I call that the "Becky storm-off"....and one of the reason I tend to use "cum dumpster" as a pre-emptive term of reference.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 11:48 PM
2

Sounds like typical bullshit...I recently laughed in the face of someone who tried to pull "female logic" on me...I asked if she was also entitled to "female mathematics" where 2+2=147 "because I say so".
/r/MensRights04/09/22 08:10 PM
1

Ahhh that one CAN have a some validity....there was a thing a while back where women were complaining that men were slipping off the condom and they couldn't tell from the feel. It's a valid point that she consented to protected sex, but didn't consent to unprotected sex. But yea, if he won't put it on, either choose to fuck him or not, and it's not rape unless he physically coerces you. This shit isn't complicated. Sounds like typical "Have my cake and eat it bullshit" like "I got the dick I wa…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 07:21 PM
12

The traditional "skepticism" about "believe women" is and has always been COMPLETELY justified. (Note that I am not justifying or condoning actual rape. ) There are LOTS of ways that "yes" turns into "no" AFTER THE FACT, especially with now all the bullshit ambiguity getting introduced into "consent" like "I said yes, but it wasn't 'enthusiastic' so I'll just say I clearly told him 'no', it's really the same thing." For example: I was drunk and embarrassed that I fucked him. I was OK with it unt…
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:48 PM
1

If you say so.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:17 PM
1

You're going to be surprised what people will tolerate with the alternative being NO teacher.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 02:16 PM
4

Yes and no. As the supply of teachers dwindles, especially qualified ones who are willing to stay will become so powerful that they will be able to tell off crazy parents with impunity. You're going to see community members smacking down their crazy neighbors for antagonizing the teacher they were lucky to get.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:53 PM
1

Let me just clarify that you can't judge any group of women by the "mail order brides" from their country. Mail order brides (and similar-going "husband hunting" in a wealthier country) are basically nothing but prostitutes, and of course behave accordingly.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:24 PM
3

Just from a quick look, getting 53 year old Caribbean woman to tell off dumb little bimbos-Total win :D "Ain't no rich 'andsome man gonna want you when you 36 wit 2 kid and wit 2 baby daddy. Wat you tinkin girl?"
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:54 PM
6

Heh, "the market" is about to fix this as teachers are fed up with insane parents, low pay, and bad working conditions....they're going to be desperately hiring anyone with a pulse soon... :D Including probably A LOT of actual pedophiles
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:08 PM
5

I'm really sorry you have to deal with this, it's beyond crazy. The same morons who were oblivious to the problems in past days are now hallucinating it literally EVERYWHERE. I've even seen people online who think even like a HS Junior dating a sophomore is "pedophilia".....or (I'm referring to Stranger Things) in a TV show, a 19 year old 5th year Senior having some "chemistry" with an 18 year old
/r/MensRights03/09/22 12:06 PM
5

I don't mean to do a mail order bride commercial, but women in that part of the world generally tend to be MUCH more reasonable and realistic than especially Americans. Including typically being appropriately VERY grateful (and even sometimes feeling guilty) at the sacrifices their men make to protect them. They generally realize it is a "gift", and not an entitled birthright.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 06:12 PM
5

It's actually really interesting...as a moderate Biden Democrat, but sympathizer with men's rights issues and opponent to feminist (or any) hypocrisy, I kinda chafe being part of the "rah rah girl power" party....it mostly comes out of the far-left, waterhead overprivileged and overentitled "winemoms' that are more interested in showing off for each other and more enjoy it when we lose. But happy to see that the other side (Waters is GOP) is on that bandwagon too...it's not a partisan issue it's…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:10 PM
1

-I don't have any evidence of this and it MAY be excessive paranoia, but I wonder if some of this is actually Russian intelligence driven as they have supported other fascism enabling far left-wing extremism. It's probably not, but it doesn't seem SO far-fetched that they could payola some waterhead influencers while manipulating the algorithms
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:02 PM
2

Again, I am disgusted at having the impediment of this pointless performative foolishness as "baggage" while we try to literally fight off fascism. I've taken great glee pointing out to some of these idiots that THEY are the ones who are going to be lined up and shot as a "Godless freakshow" after they offend enough "normies" with "corrupting their children"....there is a WORLD of difference between "tolerance and respect" and enabling destructive propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:55 PM
7

I'm going to take the karma hit and tell you "good for you"...while they are VERY few and far between, there actually ARE a very few "good girls" out there that aren't hypergamic cum dumpsters delusional that they're going to get a 6'4 ripped rich husband out of being drunk bootycalled at 3 AM by every sexy badboy they know. I frequently cite a much younger female friend who I knew from her 16....married her second boyfriend a lanky and nerdy "nice boy". It does happen. She interestingly while l…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:45 PM
7

I think you know I'm prognosticating a "backlash" against hypergamy and rush to pair up, marry up, make babies........what this (even further tightening delusionally ridiculous standards) seems to me is very similar to the way that a market peaks with one last little push to the upside after which the decline starts.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:13 AM
1

Yea....I believe they were mostly in commercial property and casualty...I was young and minimally interested
/r/MensRights02/09/22 12:51 AM
1

I worked about 2.5 years in an insurance company that occupied the entire skyscraper, in the US. I'm not sure what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:20 PM
1

And yet again with the self-serving feeling-centric logic impaired double standards where women get to have and do anything they want and men are supposed to "step up" and gleefully accept any bag of shit that any woman will grace him with....which they have largely gotten away with as hypergamy "starves" 80% of men so they actually ARE happy to get SOMETHING especially when young. BTW it's NOT just superficial to not want an obese woman....like all 'addicts', the reason they are abusing food an…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:32 PM
1

I'm VERY happy that I was smart and perceptive enough "back in the day" to see "the deal" and avoid it...not wanting to dox, I'm (99%) going to come out REALLY good , but it's been a very long difficult path that isn't viable for most men. I laugh at the periodic "incel" accusations telling people "You wouldn't believe me if I told you the truth." And jubilant at seeing the little exploitative scam (35 year old boring provider is de facto economically subsidizing 31 year old wife getting basical…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 06:03 PM
1

I wrote somewhere today about what I call the "sugar and spice" fallacy where there is a presumption that women have superhuman selfless morality who would never even THINK of abusing the safeguards that were created to protect them....unfortunately we've learned the hard way.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:26 PM
1

I've heard in respectable corners also that it was almost always M>F too in it's EXTREMELY rare occurrence. BTW I just LOVED the "neo-pronouning" in the video you got me, "bug, vampire', anything that you LIKE".....these little over-indulged trendoid waterheads NEED to be smacked down in a backlash but it's unfortunately likely to come in a coercive "Handmaids" type scenario. I'm kind of accepting the probable inevitability of it.....so long as it's not Trump and company who I'm hoping the DOJ s…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:20 PM
3

First an 'aside' about your observations about 'feeling centric'....discarding "logic" (which to be fair, MANY men struggle with too although they tend to be better at making it LOOK like they're being logical) ......enables women to embrace laughably contradictory self-serving positions where they are simultaneously exploited victims who need to be protected and can't be responsible for anything that they do.....WHILE AT THE SAME TIME hyper-competent badasses, that are MUCH smarter and more cap…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:05 PM
2

One of the things I say frequently is that we used to have a male chauvinism problem. Things actually DID used to be ridiculous with presumption about female capacity which is SOMETIMES very high. There are VERY capable women in some of the most demanding occupations and activities...also there certainly were abuses...e.g. an old joke about how a secretary is like a lamp...not a permanent part of the office until she was screwed onto the desk. BUT, in typical infantile fashion, with little compr…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:09 PM
2

Nice, and thank you....forwarding to 'Bestie' I actually got really pissed yesterday....mindful of privacy I'm a degree of separation from a legit LBGTQ+ member who committed suicide last week largely because of housing discrimination...he was about to be homeless and destitute. I think of these little waterheads (including the straight ones performing with completely unnecessary their he/him/she/her) ginning up backlash over idiotic pronoun bullshit.....which we have to overcome, when there act…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:24 AM
2

I believe it actually is an issue of "supply and demand", ECON 101. In a slight but mostly accurate oversimplification, if 80% of women give 'favor' to 20% of men, this means that on average there are 4 women always competing for 1 man. In this "seller's market" girls are basically "forced" to bring their "best offer" to the target men....quick and easy sex. Typically, if the girl fails to provide it, the target male just moves to the next "competitor". In addition to the factors we discussed th…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 02:15 AM
1

Oh yea, one more idea. There is a group of mostly African American women on Twitter "The K-Hive" who actually "gelled together" in a pushback against a fake #Metoo operation created by left-wing extremists to derail President Biden in the primary. They stayed cohesive "fighting disinformation and left-wing extremism" online. You've got some common ground there as most of the gender and sexuality "craziness" (including #Metoo) is getting pushed by left-wing extremists . The movement "boss" is Bia…
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:01 AM
1

Heh, fortunately "isolated" and running a "one horse shop" I get to pretty much avoid my colleagues except for a close male friend in academia. I laughed uproariously once at a "junior" who asked me how I "network and connect" with my colleagues as though it was a necessary and mandatory activity. Ooohh that would be great to enlist people who actually ARE fullblown REAL trans....they, along with the 'gays' are the ones who are actually going to get killed by right-wing extremist backlash to the…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:38 PM
1

Heh, that was "Mayberry" relatively speaking.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:03 PM
1

You might incidentally share your experience on a post or something...not sure where...you'll likely get "swarmed" by idiots screaming "transphobe" at your or whatever the fuck it is. Ahh one of my frequent refrains is that as men are a gender minority in the "human behavior" business, it's necessary to have at least a masters degree, and most highly educated women marry 'up' to a high income producer.......my colleagues tend to be a bunch of pampered, crazy, overindulged Karen 'wine moms' who a…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:02 PM
1

:D.....spent most of my childhood trying to get the clothes off the also pre-pubescent neighbor girl...with success a few times. She got caught once by her Mother giving a dozen 10 year boys a "show" out her window.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:54 PM
1

-reading closer still....err, you don't want to know what I think of some of my colleagues in the "human behavior business", frequently WAY more crazy and dysfunctional than the people they are supposed to be treating. Although I'm myself in an unusual situation somewhat "sheltered and isolated", I'm ASTOUNDED by some of the "batshit crazy and stupid" that goes around on some of the message boards I belong to. I was actually thinking I'd start referring gender/sexuality issue clients to a local …
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:46 PM
2

-BTW "curious when we were young". Err yes, it's a very well known childhood behavior traditionally referred to as "playing doctor".
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:39 PM
2

Not at all 'sorry'...Thank you, I'm actually very interested to hear about this, first hand experience. I'm obviously older and somewhat "out of touch" in some ways, except for online. And JESUS CHRIST, it's WAY worse than I even imagined () ....I'm actually going to show this to my "progressive' female bestie who has been too busy last several years to be aware of the "craziness"...she thinks I'm overreacting and being "insenstive" to trans et al.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:28 PM
3

Again REALLY glad to hear from women standing up and pushing back against this foolishness. In a certain way it's actually "self-defense" to smack down people on "your side" (in this case your gender) behaving in an idiotic way that is going to "blow back" not only on them, but also others. Note that you are specially empowered as you can't be dismissed as "misogynist" As mentioned on the other comment, I'm a moderate 'Biden Democrat' and supporter of democracy, and in a position of needing to "…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:11 PM
2

Roundly agreed on all. I'm actually a moderate 'Biden Democrat' and FURIOUS that with fascism knocking on the door, we have to be on the side at least perfunctorily (as "pro-LBGTQ+++") defend this batshit insane foolishness...with the electorate just wanting housing, reasonable paychecks and expenses....and their children studying "Reading, writing, arithmetic" rather than being educated on probably mostly imagined gender/sexuality differences and dynamics. I forget who, someone on I think one o…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 09:57 PM
3

This is a really good post. I just noted above to someone mentioning that "groupies" now think they are actually jockeying for a +++relationship+++ with famous performing artists they fuck....that American women have over the last 40 years or so gone from RIDICULOUS in their expectations of what 'man' they are going to get to 'keep' to full on DELUSIONAL...I cited multifactorial influences including rising aggregate narcissism, "Princess culture" (EVERY girl is a "princess"), social media, and "…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:53 PM
3

On "convincing some women they were abused": Very recently I posted about when I was young and very drunk having an unattractive woman follow me to my dorm room and entice me to have sex with her while my judgment was impaired. Something comparable to this would EASILY be considered "rape" under ridiculous schemas that are being pushed now. Was I HURT by this experience? Save for being a little bit grossed out and embarrassed...No Was I responsible for my own behavior, drunkenly making a choice …
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:36 PM
5

This is very interesting. I assume you're in the US. I post a lot about hypergamy, the primate behavior that homo sapien females engage in unless something stops them....they will "mate" only with with the 20% most attractive males, even if themselves are "ordinary" or "below average'.....creating MASSIVE social problems including I believe rising fascism and school shootings I've maintained even beyound this, that US women's expectations which have been RIDICULOUS since at least the 80's when I…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 07:51 PM
5

Heh it amuses me that you're actually taking a more hardline stance than I do as an otherwise sympathetic presumably reasonable fellow woman. There is LOTS of stuff like this where your fellow women have abused the hell out of the (infantile and idiotic) general societal perception that "men are guilty until proven innocent" and women are "100% innocent victim" in anything relating to sex and gender relations. I've even recently seen a feminist writer acknowledge that women usually CAN detect th…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 05:09 PM
2

-noting your edit announcing that you are a woman. It's an interesting indication of where we apparently are in the "backlash" cycle when even otherwise sympathetic fellow women start seeing that this shit FAR exceeds "ridiculous", and has for a LONG time.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 04:07 PM
5

Ummm not really....'proper' "#MeToo" originated from Harvey Weinstein who was running basically a "casting couch" where he was abusing his ability to "gatekeep" scarce opportunities for actresses moving on into lucrative film careers. There are VERY few even "loose" parallels to this in the lives of 99+% of women. Them changing it into a bitchfest about basically any time a man they aren't strongly attracted to (the strong majority) trying to get them doesn't change this.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 03:04 PM
4

I've been thinking of writing a post about this...the whole premise of a large portion of women being subject to 'Weinstein' type behavior with the casting couch is laughable. Why do I say this? Because outside Hollywood and the performing arts it's VERY rare that women are "up" for something that can be leveraged to "force" them to give up the pussy. First of all, propaganda notwithstanding, not very many of them are actually REALLY serious about 'work' of any kind. And those who are (facing fa…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 01:43 PM
2

I've been pointing out for DECADES that "sexual harassment" is intrinsically flawed because it's only how "Behavior X" is VIEWED by the woman. Brad Pitt and Drew Carey can do the EXACT SAME THING and while the latter gets a complaint to HR the former results in giggling. What other behavior is 'regulated' (with severe penalties) in this way according to how the woman FEELS about it? I'm going to laugh when the backlash to this ends up in basically "Handmaids"
/r/MensRights31/08/22 12:53 PM
1

-also note how "reproductive freedom" is ALWAYS about some pious married woman with an ectopic pregnancy (which I agree she should be able to terminate by medical necessity).... ...and NEVER about "Oops, I forgot to refill my BC prescription and if I don't show up for Jagoff X's 3 AM bootycall, he'll drop me and call someone else...and we had a little 'accident'"
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:05 PM
2

:D Must be a British thing. In my experience, you'll have literally a full skyscraper occupied by an insurance company and there are like 3 attractive women in the whole building.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:52 PM
3

I was responding to "your post kinda reeks of it"
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:39 PM
1

Very true. I've previously noted that +++women especially+++ LOVE to reframe and "spin". I complain a lot about hypergamy (disregarding all men except the 20% most "sexy", even if the woman herself is "ordinary") which I think creates A LOT of societal problems, and hear back "Fuck you, misogynist incel! I go with the boys I like and don't go with the boys I don't.".... ...noting that she "likes" the same 20% that all the others are throwing themselves at, she's pretty much just using different,…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:36 PM
2

Quite the opposite-being actually highly educated and highly experienced, I'm VERY aware of the limits of my own singular perspective (SOMEWHAT informed by imperfect but at least more objective scientific "data") And also aware that it's actually VERY difficult to be completely wrong, and there is often validity in perspectives that I disagree with.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 06:12 PM
3

Over the years, I can think of a couple car design issues that I wish someone had "mansplained" to me including where they hide the hood release lever in a Geo Tracker, and how to get 90's era Fords to not start "alarming" with incessant staccato honking when you do something or other to trigger them. I recall some difficulty with an "Attack Taurus"
/r/MensRights29/08/22 02:35 PM
1

Your perspective is valid but 'dated'....when you were 30 or so, someone pointed out the other day car salesmen were still telling women "come back in with your husband"....I'm GenX and they have been basically exponentially insufferable since I was a child.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 01:30 PM
0

-You're "Princess Research" right? The "professional internet arguer"?
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:58 AM
0

I believe we previously established that you aren't capable of differentiating your opinions and value judgments from objective facts, so feel free to pound the keyboard 'saying stuff'.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:37 AM
9

#metoo would actually be an interesting one to take on as well. Certainly legitimate "sexual harassment" does occur (also not nearly as much as it's misused used as a "club" to enforce female preferences )......but outside Hollywood, how many women experience a full on "Weinstein" where a powerful man put their career prospects at stake if she doesn't fuck him? Hell for that matter, what percentage of women are even up for roles that could be "leveraged" like "Partner in a white shoe law firm"..…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:35 AM
12

A tangential issue here is how often usually young attractive women are "hired for looks" into roles they're not actually fully equipped for......and often per Dunning Krueger, indignantly unaware that they are being educated in "fine points" of this or that.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 03:27 AM
8

Maybe not quite on the same issue, but largely true at least in a sense. Men often have to bring something actually valuable to justify their place. For example I was once tentatively invited to play intensive hardcore volleyball with a group of men. The invitation was politely revoked when they found that my skill level was below the group average and I'd likely substantially disadvantage the "side" I was on. Conversely an (unskilled-yes, SOME women are very skillful at volleyball) attractive w…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:51 AM
1

Yes yes yes, whatever it takes for you to pretend that your keyboard pounding has "owned" me....run along now, grownups are busy.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:54 PM
1

There wasn't an argument since your first ridiculous strawman. My last paragraph "argument" is facetious mocking of the cartoonish, ridiculous female chauvinism that has been propagandized into the cultural "wisdom".
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:43 PM
1

Continuing to pound keys...and providing actually a wonderful demonstration of how much "mansplaining" is actually: "Although I don't actually know my ass from a hole in the ground, I THINK I know what I'm talking about, and don't want to listen to anyone else, ESPECIALLY a stupid man who EVERYONE knows don't know anything, as they aren't super smart and hyper-competent expert bad-asses as ALL women are."
/r/MensRights28/08/22 09:14 PM
1

there’s certain niches he’s gonna be an expert at. "there’s certain niches he’s gonna be an expert at."-What "niche" did I mention? Strawman :D And "average" is a fucking imbecile. In the context of the Finance example, the AVERAGE person can't explain the difference between a stock and a bond. Someone "above average" in this context might be someone who has passed the Series 7 exam-which in grownup reality means "The government has determined that you are sufficiently knowledgeable to MAYBE not…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 08:02 PM
1

What's a "high level"? Enough to impress the other "intellectuals" sitting on the Applebees bar in a cheap 4th rate suburb? "Someone with a PhD in Finance is not gonna be an expert in all Finance-Related Topics, there’s certain niches he’s gonna be an expert at."--Strawman, I didn't say that and you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. What I described was a BASIC thing that yes everyone with even a BS is going to know about.. Yes, you have TRULY struck a nerve. The know-it-all, ye…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 07:36 PM
1

Maybe you're a worthless know-it-all clown-idiot trying to psychoanalyze me. Also apparently don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. I've got technically 9 going on 12 credential letters behind my name. Having "education" even to the PhD level does not necessarily make you "expert" in something. Having a masters degree basically makes you "moderately accomplished" in "slightly expanded basics", with no hands on experience---at least at the "serious grownup level" Someone with say an MS in…
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:54 PM
1

That is interesting...I've always kind of wondered if "The meek shall inherit the Earth" it wasn't a bad translation, meaning like for example someone spiritually enlightened (Think Eckhart Tolle-no Ego, so no boisterous, blustery...polar opposite of Donald Trump basically)
/r/MensRights28/08/22 02:51 AM
4

"Things people say" are trends, increasingly ridiculous perceptions and concepts that have serious real world effects. People talking about "sex that isn't ENTHUSIASTICALLY consented to" (even with the woman changing her mind after the fact) as the standard for what constitutes "rape" has the capacity to ruin men's lives without justification, even if it doesn't meet the legal standard for conviction.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:50 PM
5

Women are just like men right? When I was young and very drunk, a less than attractive girl (completely sober-she was the night assistant in my dormitory) I wouldn't have been interested in followed me back to my room, and "hung" on me until I "got the message" and we started having sex that continued until dawn when I walked her out to her car. Does it sound like she got my "sober consent"? Wasn't this by whackjob social justice warrior feminist standards, "rape"? Wasn't I "traumatized"? Fuck n…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 10:09 PM
5

I'm sure the 6 episodes were completed in a batch and will be shown....although in a related issue, Warner Brothers just shelved "Batgirl" taking like a $100 million hit for purportedly similar issues.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:18 PM
9

I'm very sorry that happened to you, and nobody is disputing that these things happen and are atrocious. The perpetrator was I hope caught and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But they are RELATIVELY rare and also an act of "stranger" violence that another gentleman I believe above points out with data, happen MUCH more to men than women. If anything, someone like you should be FURIOUS at other women for "crying wolf" equating for example her CHOICE to "hang out" and "make out" with …
/r/MensRights27/08/22 08:14 PM
1

I'm more and more thinking (and I say this as more or less a highly educated "traditionally classic liberal"--although I'm more and more put off by the "ridiculousness", especially with fascism knocking at the door) that as the homo sapien female most of the time DEMONSTRABLY can't manage to make sexual and mating choices that are even in HER OWN best interest we're going to need to somehow return to some kind of a "traditional" morality structure as we had prior to "The Pill" and legalized abor…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:59 PM
2

Yea, it's gone downhill, although I continue to watch......I'll note incidentally that I was in response to the inevitable "You just don't want to see girls in positions of power" criticism that I was actually somewhat pleased with Kamala Khan who MADE UP A NEW CHARACTER to center in the story, rather than co-opting a legacy male character with a clearly SO much smarter and more competent female adjunct beclowning and rescuing him. The reason they can't do more "original" stuff is that their ide…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 07:20 PM
3

I didn't read the comic as a child, but believe it preceded "Shrek"-comic I understand was somewhat "tongue in cheek" and satirical.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 06:03 PM
2

You know your stats clearly. I meant to comment also on how much "muddy water" has come up on this topic about "consent"....It's now gotten to be not "real and actual consent" unless it's "enthusiastic"...so technically you were "date raped" if you only agreed***, but weren't "excited" about having sex.*** What if one's perception changes after the fact, e.g. what you think is a great idea Saturday night while horny and tipsy (I won't get into "Women can't consent when drunk"), doesn't seem so m…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 05:58 PM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LQ7B4TFOu4&t=368s Well followed Youtube film critic "Critical Drinker" rips it apart.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 05:14 PM
13

This is a valid point. There actually WAS in the past serious inequality, including even legitimately being able to pay women substantively less for doing exactly the same job. But that is approaching TWO generations back and women who actually experienced that are now elderly or no longer with us. And now we have female chauvinism that is every bit as laughably ridiculous as male ever was.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 05:12 PM
4

See above, my comment, including a feminist writer (former rape counselor, activist and advocate) tactfully acknowledging that women actually usually CAN tell who the sexually aggressive men are---I'll add typically they disregard the common sense of not making themselves vulnerable because those men are "exciting" to be with. https://www.commonsense.news/p/im-30-the-sexual-revolution-shackled?utm\_source=substack&utm\_medium=email&triedSigningIn=true
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:46 PM
9

-Oh btw on 'rape'.....I believe it actually IS up, but almost all as always 'date rape'...you've seen my posts on hypergamy.......LIKELY the change is a mostly combination of massive over-entitlement created in the "sexy-boys" who have "liberated" women competing for them...possibly also hyper-frustrated "un-selected" men, but I believe they mostly tend to go "passive" jerking out their frustrations to porn (Which caused "historical" rates of rape to drop when it became widely available ) Incide…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 04:40 PM
7

:D I studied martial arts through high school, earning a black belt. It really is 'a thing' where women/girls tend to get a big head, unaware that their sparring partners are handling them with "kid gloves".......and are completely unaware of what it's actually like to have someone actually seriously hit you. :D "McDojo" too....I left one of these after maybe a year and half, and moved to one that was in the 'ghetto', training with like big powerful African American men....men who later became p…
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:58 PM
16

You're a smart guy-a compliment I don't give lightly.
/r/MensRights27/08/22 03:26 PM
41

Summer Feminism has ALWAYS been full of despicable hypocrisy and double standards. Women are all tough and badass, and SO much smarter and capable than you, OBVIOUSLY capable of making their own decisions. BUT How DARE you assign ANY culpability whatsoever for the woman's contribution to the bad thing (Including changing her mind afterwards) that happened. The poor vulnerable little thing is OBVIOUSLY a complete victim of circumstances.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:25 PM
6

Funny anecdote, years ago, I was sitting with a mild-looking, short, bearded middle aged man at a bar when a girl, wearing a slit to her waist open boobyshirt screamed at him for "staring" about 15 feet away.....she was of course trying to draw attention to herself and "show off" that she can reject male attention especially an "unworthy" not-sexy older man. .....he proceeded to explode right back to her at the top of his lungs basically "You stupid fucking cunt, dressing like that I'd kind of t…
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:39 PM
1

It's difficult to be completely wrong, and usually stuff is "more than one thing"...multifactorial is a nice fancy work. Could be that in the past women would have refused this for failing to live up to the standard of "ladylike" or whatever...this would create shame, and yes, discarding that standard would alleviate the shame AND My thoughts that it's the small % of men who are drowned in pussy and actually getting bored with it so starting to (In accordance to human nature-innumerable examples…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:52 PM
3

If I'm understanding you correctly, I concur. Human societies have shame and stigma for a reason....engaging in behaviors that are bad for the self or society. They CAN of course be excessive, but a lot of "progressive" numbskulls threw the baby out with the bathwater. "Sluts" for example are stigmatized for a reason. Their demonstrated behavior displays a lack of reasonable discretion about when and with whom they spread their legs...which would (and does) for obvious reasons predict infidelity…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 10:40 PM
1

You can believe as you wish....I'd wonder how for example though I know about how disparate groups of neurons thematically devoted to impressions of lived experiences filtered through cognitive biases "conflict" in the brain by literally oscillating at different speeds. Or how when someone tells you "I'm going crazy" they are most likely experiencing depersonalization or derealization, a fairly common "slip" into full blown DSM-V crazy resulting from "stress"...and it will likely subside when th…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:54 PM
1

I have a very extensive formal education, and have worked in the "human behavior" business helping others to heal and address other difficulties . In the process of doing this I went through an extensive process of "healing" myself...I assure you I'm fine. Any "anger" I feel is directed at basically the societal refusal to look at objective reality on this topic (which incidentally I believe is driving rising fascism and school shootings) -this actually is the opposite of "crazy" where basically…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:36 PM
1

-oh and regarding my harsh tone and language e.g. "cum dumpster"...this is basically a reaction to as I alluded to before...that ANY type of criticism of women's behavior, no matter how kind and polite gets harpy shrieked down. Even for example VERY respectfully and politely suggesting that a young girl use a bit of compassion on a maladjusted boy who is interested in her, being kind and respectful as she rejects him... ....resulted in me getting "harpy swarmed" by 20 women invoking that I shoul…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:21 PM
1

:D We won't discuss what a good portion of the going on 11 letters behind my name are. While I appreciate the kind words, I have forgotten more about "healing" than you can imagine.....even down to like the point of being able to describe physiologically in the brain where "emotional distress" comes from, and the process by which "peace" is achieved. Seeing and understanding what objective reality is actually like (documented with evidence) , and the problems that it causes doesn't mean that I'm…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:12 PM
6

Yet again, basically ad hominem, mocking me rather than addressing points....because you can't.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 08:01 PM
5

:D You clearly don't get out much. Are you a lesbian and don't actually know what the straight girls are doing? There are 144 hours in a week. Google "West Elm Caleb"-a bunch of girls in NYC discovered that this guy was "dating" like 10-15 girls at a time, fucking sometimes 2 or more a day and took out a billboard to warn others about him :D Hell even my allegedly "jealous, incel" ass has fucked two different women within 24 hours.....I was trying to break up with one who wouldn't leave me alone…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:52 PM
1

Back handed ad hominem, implying that I'm 'weak' or a hypocrite. I do realize that your sub-middle school critical thinking skills think this passes for a valid response to my points, but it doesn't
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:42 PM
3

Oh would you like aggregate data? Why didn't you say so? There is some linked in this article documenting what I've been saying that women form a cum dumpster harem around 20% of men, engaging in primate behavior, and obviously resulting in pretty little Abby in the video being 3rd on some sexy guy's booty call list https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/ I believe there is some in the feminist's article also The "cultural trends" one I mention above also i…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:36 PM
1

Ad hominem insulting instead of addressing my points. More pretending that you aren't wrong
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:31 PM
2

In this particular context...yes, exactly. Others...not so much....men actually can be mighty stupid too, for example mistaking Donald Trump for a competent decision maker when he's a cartoonish clown. But I'm quite certain that the stupidest man on the planet could tell "Abby" in the video above to not fuck a guy who calls you third at 2 AM to come over and fuck him....and to instead pick one of the probably hundred other perfectly good boys in her life that aren't "super sexy" to make her boyf…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:27 PM
1

Yes yes yes, run along and pretend that you're capable of independent function somewhere else. No no no REALLY you're super smart and know EVERYTHING and anyone who DARES to question what you think is obviously just a mansplaining misogynist. It's this attitude that caused the right wing to yank abortion rights after a 50 year fight-I don't agree with them about most things, but they actually are right that women in aggregate aren't capable of making mating and reproduction decisions that are in…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:18 PM
1

Yet oddly things are going so well, that record numbers of women are joining convents, after finding out the actual results of being given "freedom and liberty" to make their own SO smart choices.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:11 PM
1

Non-sequitur. You don't have a valid answer to my response so are now pounding keys in order to continue pretending that you aren't a clueless idiot having kneejerk reactions.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:07 PM
3

:D You don't get out much do you.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:04 PM
4

I don't know anything about whoever the fuck this is. But keep on demonstrating those critical thinking skills that shouldn't have gotten you out of middle school. ONE MAN does something wrong and bad, and therefore ALL criticisms about how women are exempted from behavioral consequences, and demonstrably incapable of making decisions about mating and reproduction that are in their own best interest....are invalidated.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 07:01 PM
3

Yes yes yes, I know, I've committed the cardinal sin DARING to suggest that women aren't perfect and smart and absolutely capable of making good decisions ALL on their own....even with you know, strong evidence that this clearly isn't the case. I'd actually forgotten about all of that until reminded by the emergence of data on the topic, gathered by dating sites.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:55 PM
1

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Is the feminist writer, rape and domestic violence counselor I quote above an incel and mysognist too? The men who are "ho and sluts" are a small percentage (20% of men) which the overwhelming majority of women give almost all the sex to. This has been validated by data. The vast majority of men aren't because it's not possible as women revel You don't think I'm "degrading men" when I bring up them (the 20% "hot and sexy") starting to strang…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:42 PM
1

Yea "wokeness" is basically a ridiculous power play adopted by affluent whites who get off on tilting at windmills and showing off for each other how "progressive" and "socialist" they are..........and more hurt the vulnerable groups they are allegedly protecting...I actually loathe them more than the fascists who are at least honest and straightforward about pushing their self-interest. I hope they somehow eliminate or de-canonize the sequel trilogy, perhaps ala Ghostbusters where they just ign…
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:29 PM
1

Sure thing...good luck.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 12:01 AM
1

:D I see you've found Doomcock and Critical Drinkier on Youtube...their rants are entertaining, if not a HAIR over the top (and they have a point especially on Star Wars) My thoughts: There was basically ZERO pushback on recasting Battlestar Galactica's Starbuck as a hard-hitting badass woman back in 2005. Nobody had a problem with this shit until it got ridiculous. I don't mind to see for example Kamala Khan-if they want to make a story about a woman, create a new character. DUNE recently did a…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:41 PM
6

If it's any consolation, I've got a bit of insight into this. Men are a gender minority in "therapist", and a LOT of female therapists don't like seeing and avoid men if they are able to do so....for ANY reason...also there is a bias against "scary" and "difficult"...a thing went around a while ago that they need to keep and try to help their suicidal clients (male and female) instead of being a pansy candy ass and just referring them out as almost all were because they aren't "pleasant" to deal…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 11:01 PM
2

BTW funny correlate to the "fucked a transient partyboy almost in front of me" About 6-7 years later, I found out that "transient partyboy" (He had literally fucked every girl in the big restaurant we worked in together...including probably most of the ones with boyfriends and husbands...they were just sneakier about it. He knew incidentally I'd been after 'girl' for months, and we were at least tangentially "buddies".) ........ got trapped by a baby by the BIGGEST nasty, trashy skank I have met…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 07:39 PM
1

If you would like to do something productive, work to raise awareness about the power dynamic shifting, and that men should fully avail themselves of women losing the unwarranted power that they make for themselves by creating an artificial scarcity in the assets they have monopoly control over-pussy and reproductive capacity. Presuming the hypothesis is correct (I didn't even address trends towards losing abortion and possibly contraception rights) that women will be in a rush to "wife up", men…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 06:04 PM
1

Interesting...in a certain way, this is a 'path to justice' as the currently younger ones haven't abused the "status quo" nearly as long and hard as their 'mattress-back' older sisters. They (mattress-backs) will also under a "new regime" be punished for their promiscuity, which rightfully is "stigmatized" and (when they haven't distorted the market creating an artificial "scarcity") lowers their "marital value"...… demonstrable promiscuity correctly indicates a propensity to cheat and present h…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 05:22 PM
4

There is something to this. I've seen a woman (Specifically a VERY ordinary plain retail clerk) for example spend 5+ years being the "3 AM drunk bootycall." for a "sexy" guy who otherwise wants nothing to do with her. What are the chances that if she "gives up" and "settles" for a not so sexy man that she won't come running when "bootycall" summons her....she demonstrably believes that she "deserves' to have a man like that and she's "injusticed" by having to settle....not to mention having a HU…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 04:28 PM
2

This is correct. As a general rule (there are exceptions-motivated by potential "jackpot" payoffs) "Chad" is mostly exempted from the "bag of shit"...for example almost all "sexual harassment" is as a comedian put it years ago "Just an ugly guy trying to get some pussy."....Almost always "Drew Carey" can do the EXACT SAME THING as "Brad Pitt" and while the latter results in perhaps red faced giggling, the former results in a call to HR. But yes, he's going to pay with courts and law.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 04:01 PM
2

I point out in another comment that a good bit of the power imbalance they pretend doesn't exist (strongly varies of course by age, race, and social status) will be alleviated over time with for example men overall being somewhat less enchanted (and prone to 'indulge' them) by young women's bodies having been able to access probably at least one "equal" in his youth....not to mention, them losing the ability (facing at least social stigma, possible unwanted pregnancy risk) to convey 'pussy' at t…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 03:04 PM
6

Probably something to this...I believe it was WWII that "normalized" the idea as women came out to do 'the work' as the men were fighting. Likely it grew organically as employers realized that they had an untapped supply of labor driving down it's price which they were happy to encourage. In the old days they were even able to get away with paying women less (and men along with them with increased labor supply), and by the time this was alleviated, their labor participation was well entrenched. …
/r/MensRights23/08/22 02:04 PM
10

Generally they deride "playboys", willfully overlooking that they generally actually CREATE them, making a small minority of men "rich" by having pussy thrown at them day and night...as they "starve" the other 80% including men who are 'objectively' more than many women, are although not "super sexy". They make a legitimate moral argument that the "playboys" shouldn't treat them as they do, "fucking and chucking" their fellow humans....but are willfully blind that they treat the "desperate horde…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 01:47 PM
9

A good bit of that is basically because they have monopoly control of a scarce resource-pussy and reproductive capacity -including law and social protections they abuse to attack unwanted suitors-most "sexual harassment" is bullshit, and they'll scream "creepy" at the drop of a hat to stigmatize . The way that they have abused their "freedom" created a horde of desperate men vying for their favor has resulted in massive overindulgence to their will. Losing the ability (via social stigma and I pe…
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:59 PM
18

You're likely correct. There is also an article linked from I think the "Common Sense" substack indicating that historical numbers of women have recently joined convents. Incidentally I was kind of chuckling....some of these girls are crying about being 3rd on a guy's list.....lots of men are like "57th", "134th" on a woman's.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 04:07 AM
1

:D Most probably....I'm sure you're aware of the context there on that phase. To be fair (which I aspire to), yes, there ARE rare exceptions. A young female friend of mine for example married her second boyfriend, a somewhat geeky "nice boy" in her mid-twenties. ...to the extent of my knowledge she didn't spend any time on the "cock carousel" (edit) Laughing my head off by the way that I've brought "cum-dumpster harem" into Reddit's vocabulary.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:19 AM
1

Actually no, "intuition" doesn't fit the context...but you're right about "mansplaining" it's another club frequently used to dismiss anything that they don't like.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:16 PM
1

-Did a re-read. I don't have much of a problem with anything said, except that it's lacking in perspective. Two comments: All the stuff about "their Mothers"......their GenX and elder Millennial Mothers also were sexy-badboy chasing cum dumpsters, albeit less efficient as they didn't have smartphone dating apps. And the article comes a gnats hair away from actually acknowledging that women (rather than being blameless victims) have a healthy degree of culpability for getting abused, assaulted, r…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:48 PM
6

I skimmed it.....looked like valid points (with the typical being just stupid manbashing) , but lacking in perspective. E.g. I'm sure that girls DO go home and cry after being repeatedly fucked and chucked by "playboys" ....but it overlooks the female fault in creating the situation.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 01:50 PM
5

This is a shockingly insightful article.....seems the pendulum is finally swinging back towards sanity. Let me however add my favorite refrain to what WOMEN do to make things fucked up-feel free to steal as you like if you get inclined to write something Hypergamy is primate (chimpanzee) behavior where the 80% of females will usually only mate with the 20% of most attractive males. Homo sapien females behave in this manner unless something stops them from doing it such as rigid moral enforcement…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 04:22 AM
2

Exactly. There is no such animal...they tend to think that what are actually (mostly self-serving, irrational) "feelings" have the same "weight" as an evidence supported conclusion. To be fair, many men have problems with this also.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 01:39 AM
31

So even DARING to question women's God-given right to form up into a cum-dumpster harem for the hottest 20% of guys until they get too old to play anymore, then expect a hard-working "lonely guy" they wouldn't give time of day to before, to buy her a house.....makes me an "incel"? I think not. Also fun is recounting sexual exploits in oddly specific minute detail. E.g. "Yea, the girl I fucked at a party 6 minutes after dropping the pimp daddy line 'C'mere, it's conference time' would only make o…
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:56 AM
3

Recently had someone try to claim that she is correct according to "feminine logic". I asked her if she has "feminine mathematics" as well and under that does 2+2 still equal 4?
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:25 AM
1

I don't see much connection, but sure. They could be controlled along with contraception, given to perhaps "registered couples" if unmarried...perhaps with a waiting period that increases exponentially \<sup>3</sup> for every partner change within say 3 years..........first waiting period is one week, second is 3 weeks, 3rd is 9, 4th is 27, 5th is 81......... Incidentally I'd also advocate for 100% paternity testing and severe penalties for "smuggling" or "trading" contraception...also men would…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:13 AM
1

You're not going to get an argument from me. "Barbaric hypergamy"...right they expect any "natural condition" that they like (throwing themselves at hot guys) to be supported, but any "unnatural condition" (e.g. birth control) that they like should also be supported. Basically it's heads I win, tails you lose under all conditions.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:00 PM
2

Someone (dopey girl who thought she was WAY smarter than she actually is) tried to tell me that women are just selecting the best males to have offspring with like "good evolution".....I laughed in her face as I'd previously pointed out that like your typical ketamine addicted club DJ "hot guy" who has fucked 3-400 women is CLEARLY who you need to partner with and make a baby :D "Hot" in men actually also is mostly a function of "privilege", more so any other kind of real superiority. Your proto…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:47 PM
0

Respectfully I don't believe any of my observations are racist. The only things I asserted as fact are: 5% of African American men are incarcerated or lost to early mortality. AND "Fugly white girls poach African American men" OK, maybe that is a little racist...I'll admit I actually REALLY don't like most of my fellow white people. But yea otherwise it's all supply and demand for the most part. And yes, I did acknowledge in the original post that I also would be very personally displeased if I …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 08:26 PM
1

:D I try not to overstep. And I think I compared white girl "GREED" to a stealing diamond ring, not a "white baby" There is elaboration below. I know I'm a little hard to follow, but you're mixing the metaphors.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 08:16 PM
1

-By the way people who have integrity, and intellectual honesty will, in the face of an argument that they can't dispute or learning that previously believed "facts" are incorrect change their perceptions. I myself just I believe yesterday did this, learning that the "fact" that 30% of people were not biologically fathered by the man who thinks he is their parent....is actually (despite being published in scientific journals) an "urban legend". Discovering this, I edited to correct myself in a p…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 08:03 PM
1

This is pretty much an ad hominem, attacking me instead of my argument. Also implicit circular reasoning: It is this-> Because I SAY it is this. And I mentioned earlier you wouldn't believe me if I told you what I had going on.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 07:52 PM
2

Sure thing, happy to do it...I get that I'm hard to follow sometimes, for example here blending abstract moral reasoning with basically "economics". Ahh just 2 additional comments: Reproduction may not be a physical need, but it is a very strong psychological one. The biggest way (I'm quoting existential psychology) that we as humans cope with the impending fear of death is to become "immortal" by passing (genetically) a part of ourselves into the future in a child. Existential psychologists bel…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 07:38 PM
1

I'm similarly highly adverse to it....just making a point that it's LESS egregious in the situation I described.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 06:55 PM
-4

-adding: 37 year old African American Elaine is screwing Boring Provider Michael, Boring Provider Jermaine, and Boring provider Tito (yes I'm using Jackson 5 names), trying to form a permanent relationship with one of them. Elaine accidentally (as there is no "advantage" to any of the competitors) becomes pregnant, by probably Tito...as he refuses to "take responsibility" and she doesn't want an abortion, she next tries Jermaine who accepts and marries her. Is she 'wrong'...YES. However, she is …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 06:12 PM
-3

It isn't perfect, but captures the nuance that the motivation is LESS (not perfectly) motivated by perhaps 'greed', and MORE motivated by 'need'. Hypergamic women (https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/) CHOOSE to "do dirt" trying to mate with or marry a highly desireable man (top 20% most attractive).....they aren't going to have "no man" if they fail to get one of the "most attractive". This roughly equates to "greed". African American women however who …
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 05:57 PM
-13

I didn't say it was 'OK'....I just said that it was different, and should be viewed that way. Perhaps an analogy would be the difference between stealing a diamond ring, and stealing food to feed your children. Both are 'wrong' at least in a legal sense, but still MUCH different things.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 05:27 PM
1

Yea, you're 'whipped' and willfully propagandized. Wait until you find out that "having the correct positions" doesn't actually "save" you or gain you anything...I've over the years seen several "white knights" get munched and thrown to the wolves in support of female hypergamy and blatant self interest. It's hilarious poetic justice seeing again a "White Knight" get hung out to dry on like a bullshit harassment or "stalking" charge cause he got in the way of one of those "sugar and spice" girl'…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 05:18 PM
-31

I'm going to take a karma hit here. Be assured that I call them like I see them. While I would be furious to see a white or 'culturally white' woman espouse a sentiment like this, I'd more "give a pass" to African American women. I say this because they are "playing a different game". Culturally white women who "do dirt" are mostly engaging in hypergamy....trying to breed or pair with the most desirable men, while "exploiting" often less desirable men to support them and the child. This is despi…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 04:39 PM
1

What I said doesn't mean the tests aren't accurate. It means that apparently the 30% estimate (which has been cited in scientific journals) of all humans being born to a "false father" is inaccurate. HOWEVER, 1/3rd of conducted paternity tests do return positive. But paternity tests aren't conducted on EVERYONE. They are given only if the man is suspicious that the mother had another sexual partner who could actually be the father. So about 1/3rd of "suspicious situations" have a "false father".…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 01:34 PM
1

You can believe as you like. The thing is it's difficult to be completely wrong, and these things you are talking about very basically yes ARE beneficial. But to think that this is the basis and gist of the problem with "incels" is extremely naïve and lacking in perspective. It ignores a major systemic issue, akin to telling for example a persecuted racial minority "just pull yourself up by your bootstraps" conveniently ignoring all of the aversity that they face like discrimination in housing, …
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:33 PM
7

Let me chime in here....I'm on record with extensive criticism of overprivileged female entitlement hypergamy etc....and suffice it to say I know quite a lot about human behavior. ......In reality, it's kind of all a moot point because for the most part "pooaaahhh" is a ridiculous joke perpetrated by dopey narcissistic hot young guys. Most of it is based on what is called attribution bias. Real typical: "Yea man I ran my badass alpha stacking technique and I fucked this girl within 10 minutes of…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:14 AM
1

Owww...I'd hope the percentage at least there isn't as high as the US/UK. Continental Europeans in my experience are usually more mature, responsible, and less narcissistic than "Anglos". Hopefully that translates into less cheating and "suckering" men into caring for children they didn't father. (Edit) I corrected myself above, 30%, although it's been cited in scientific journals is "dubious"....France is probably similar to Belgium around 2% mentioned in one of the sourcing articles for the Wi…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:38 AM
9

I concur. Just commented above there is a literal epidemic of men getting stuck paying for the baby of a wife's affair, or that of a "competitor" who the woman didn't manage to coerce into a permanent relationship.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:37 PM
19

It actually is shit common that someone's biological father isn't the man who is represented as such. Blood typing studies in the US and UK have found that fully 30% of people couldn't by blood type incompatibility be the child of the man they call "Dad". That means that it's actually probably closer to 40% as I would presume that not every child produced by an illicit union ends up with an incompatible blood type. Likely scenarios for how this happens include obviously cheating, but also women …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:34 PM
0

https://markmanson.net/ This guy...he's kind of the protoypical purveyor of what you're spouting. Insider dope has it incidentally that he while vigorously espousing "becoming a well read and cultured 'renaissance man' " he actually mostly lays around the house watching television with a hangover. Smart...if you say so. I know several people with multiple 7 figure wealth in their relative youth, world famous, etc. who would disagree with you. I usually modestly deflect them accusing me of being …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 08:11 PM
0

:D You don't know nothing about me little man....and wouldn't believe me if I told you what "reality" is. So yea, go buy up Mark Manson's bullshit or whatever. Fun fact, I actually know the guy who pushed him over the edge to discover he was doing more harm than good (to be fair he's a little more ethical than most of those shitbags ) as a "dating coach" and caused him to shift onto "philosophy and lifestyle" or whatever he's spouting.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:40 PM
4

You need to lay off the rah rah pooaaahhh shit my man. You're going to find the people feeding you that are also VERY happy to sell you all of the "secrets" for doing these things. This isn't to say there isn't a place for self-improvement BUT.... ...Let me go out on a limb here and assert that you shouldn't, in something resembling a fair and equitable situation have to be substantially ABOVE average to be with an average woman. Things weren't like this until oh probably the early 80's. Fortuna…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 07:19 PM
0

You're actually very correct. Due to hypergamy, 80% of women cluster around 20% of men. This leaves 80% of men generally receiving the "favor" of the lowest 20% of women (USUALLY unattractive). A man who is even just A LITTLE below average could easily lose out to 4/1 competition for (usually less than desirable) female "favor".
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:41 PM
1

Yet even again, logic is logic. Do you have a special mathematics too because of your "perspective"? This is evidence of your again massive overentitlement, thinking that your "thinking' is special and somehow more valuable than others. NOBODIES, man or woman "perspective" is more valuable than anyone else's. The only way to become compelling is with reasonable conclusions based on shall we say preponderance of objective evidence. Oh you're a Brit? OK, little different dynamic, as almost all of …
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:50 PM
2

I think you will be surprised to the response to a change in incentives.....as opposed to now when they largely have an infinite supply of "free casino chips" to speculate on "landing Chad", there now is a cost, which humans are very actually intuitive, sophisticated and responsive to . Years ago, an NGO, filled by "smarty pants know it all" types discovered that Mexican prostitutes (I'm sure hyper-emotional "trainwrecks", illogical...typical of sex workers. You've probably heard of "stripper lo…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 12:30 PM
2

Ummm this may not make me popular, but I view this as the path to equality. Disregarding for a moment the legal issues popular around here, basically the reason women get away with bloody murder is that they've "starved" men of their 'favor' with 80% throwing it at "Chad" (top 20%), while the other 80% of men get "scraps" Turning 80% of men into "beggars" for the sin of being "not sexy", creates an inequality as they desperately seek "women's favor". However, recent losses in "reproductive freed…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 02:34 AM
5

This guy got EXTREMELY lucky to get a good jury. An old friend related a story of a jury he served on where the majority were ready to roll over and go with the prosecution on the basis of his impressive expensive and shiny shoes. My friend "pulled the brakes" and forced his co-jurors to look at the evidence...and acquitted the defendant. If memory serves, he was a truck driver, and it was a DUI or something that would have deprived him of his license and livelihood.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:07 PM
1

Skimming through here I happened to click on your picture, and see that you are at least darked skinned. Just wanted to point out that some of the discrepancy between what you are reading, and what your perceptual experience is showing you COULD be racial. Speaking only for myself, I have ZERO problems with African American and other 'black' women in the US...I view them as political allies (Biden Centrist Democrat), and we generally get along REALLY well in real life...and I believe them to be …
/r/MensRights15/07/22 03:07 AM
4

FYI it's fun to give (not obscene) detailed descriptions of your collection of sexual encounters when someone calls you an incel. I'm saving "Female dorm lobby attendant followed me to my room drunk and attacked me while I was trying to play Contra" for a special occasion. (Edit) I'm being facetious with "attacked"
/r/MensRights14/07/22 09:48 PM
7

I saw a meme somewhere differentiating the reaction between an overweight "round" guy with bad skin, and a "very cute" young man, stressing this point. Shyness-"Aww he's SHY it's adorable/"Fucking creepy weirdo didn't open his mouth all semester. Geeky "Ohh he goes to comic book conventions, he's a geek, how cute"/"Fucking loser reading comic books, pathetic" It was a little OTT, but yes, the point remains.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:39 PM
3

It's OK, you don't have to agree with me.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:33 PM
2

Interesting. It's a different lens on a problematic behavior. I usually push (this is a little woo woo) what I call "The path of righteous action" which I believe I got from a "Holy Man's" commentary on the Bhadavad Gita. It is: Take what is in your best judgment the correct action. AND Let the results be as they are. ​ Pretty much the same thing. This tends actually to get the best results.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:29 PM
2

My friend (presuming you're male-or otherwise, no problem) , while I assure you that I'm sympathetic for your bad experience, I don't think this really takes away from my point. I made no comment about "sexy boy" entitlement-I'd say it runs the gauntlet from "massive and flagrant" to "not at all". I've known some really great guys who were "Chads"...but also yes massively overentitled narcissistic douchebags. My comment on this is even "over the line problematic" behavior like unwanted groping t…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 06:16 PM
3

I'm very "anti-grifter", especially in this area where you often see a like 6'2 pretty rich boy (It's easy to be "bold" if your asshole rich father protects you from all consequences of said "boldness") with a 6 pack selling "Alpha male lessons" to guys who mostly just weren't born as privledged as they are. But that said, this doesn't sound bad...sounds like "covert contracts" is another word for what I call "transactionalism"
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:26 PM
2

As most things it's difficult to be either completely wrong or right. There is a DEGREE of VALIDITY to complaints about what is actually "transactionalism" basically "doing X and expecting Y" like it's an established rate of exchange...like between "expensive dinner" and "sex". It is reasonable to understand women being put off by what is tantamount to apparently believing they are a prostitute. That said, women also abuse the fuck out of it, basically a bullshit excuse to justify their hypergam…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:20 PM
6

I shouldn't bother. Inevitably our "White Knight" will get burned as reality bites him in the ass. They either get so heartlessly exploited it gives them a wakeup, or even sometimes catch a bullshit sexual harassment beef.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:41 AM
10

:D He jumped over to another comment of mine to reply, trying to shame me on a political thread for posting on Men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:47 PM
1

I hold forth about it a bit in another comment. It technically means "displaying inappropriate sexual interest". Culturally white American women abuse the fuck out of it as a way to viciously stigmatize basically "Attempted interaction of some kind by a man that I don't find to be attractive."
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:59 PM
13

What you lovelorn, pathetic ass kissing weenie simps don't get is that "how someone else interprets your behavior" doesn't make it anywhere even CLOSE to "objective reality", even if it GASP comes from a female homo sapien. And it's going to be funny when you finally realize that "sucking up" won't even get them to let you sniff their dirty underwear.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:33 PM
17

I've got some mixed feelings about this I can definitely sympathize with a desire to be left alone, and someone on the thread here rightly points out that the guy violates "urinal etiquette"...and clearly he had an 'agenda' hoping to connect with her. BUT that said, is there ANY situation that shall we say even a majority of women could agree that it's OK to try and talk to her if you're not previously acquainted? I mean within reason of course. ...and to refrain from yes abusing the protection …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:22 PM
3

-Just one more comment...more and more I can see where the rising fascism is coming from through this lens. An 'ordinary guy' who say drives a forklift for a living (a fine occupation)....50 years ago, he would have paired up young with the 'girl next door' and they would cooperate to build a life together saving, buying a house, starting a family..."for better or worse" NOW, while prototypically she is "downtown" trying in extreme to even land even famous and uber wealthy men, lining up outside…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:18 AM
2

I'm myself a centrist (Biden) Democrat, but also an integrationalist who recognizes value in diverse thought...including 'traditionalism'...I first discovered that "smarty pants liberals" tend to think they know it all but actually also have their heads up their asses when I did some scholarly research about religion and spirituality...learned for example that "speaking in tongues" isn't just "babbling" as verified by an electroencephalogram on some Hatian Carmelite nuns. It accesses a different…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 03:04 AM
5

....and shockingly common I suspect. A few years ago there was an effort to end the tradition of diamonds in wedding and engagement rings due to them funding like genocides and human rights abuses in Africa. It didn't go well. Forget where I heard that women tended to say things like "Oh MINE won't be like that I just KNOW it."
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:18 AM
1

Ahh I think the bottom line risk will have more effect than you think....although it may not be used that frequently, it still exists as a "last line of defense" against an unwanted papoose...this allows them to make repeated "Hail Mary passes" such as for example I once observed a VERY plain and ordinary (Probably would have been a fine wife for an "average" man) woman spending 5+ years into her late 20's being "3 AM drunk booty call" for a "sexy" man on the slim chance that he selects her as a…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 01:11 AM
6

Unfortunately unlikely I'm afraid...as I was just discussing with the OP, women tend to NOT be so diligent about morality(e.g. convicted for child molestation) when the man is a part of the 'desirable 20%' that most of them exclusively favor. Likely they will rationalize something like "He's not going to be like that once he's had a taste of ME"
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:20 AM
3

Yea, I almost said something about that, social experiments conducted in London I believe, one claimed to be a full on NAZI, the other one first copped to a pubescent underaged girl, then also little boy...girls were still like "OK, you learned your lesson, get over here big boy." Turns out they actually aren't so much "holding the morality standard" as they would like people to believe....although "he might hurt ME" could be a different story. Ahhh I HOPE we're heading the other direction, as I…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 12:10 AM
11

Assuming that everyone is aware that 80% of women (esp. North American and I think the other Anglo countries) will grant sexual favor and 'pairing' on only the same 20% of men.....de facto "exploiting" the "unworthy" 80% most notably as an "insurance policy" to "buy her a house" (with money and career developed while sitting home alone masturbating) if she doesn't manage to "land one of the sexy ones" when she gets too old to compete with younger women.... https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attrac…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:04 PM
1

Oh BTW: There is no such thing as "woman logic". Logic is logic, just like math is math. Most likely what you're referring to is rationalized emotions relating to being self-serving, massively overentitled, and conditioned to having your cake and eating it caused by competition of desperate 'not sexy' men as 80% as you trashy she-chimpanzees cluster around the "hot boys". To be fair men largely do the same thing although they tend to be a little better at using a structure that makes it look "lo…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:20 PM
1

:D Whatever you say there 'Special Boy'
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/22 02:54 AM
1

Yea, this "incel" once got laid within like 6 minutes at a party using the cool ass pimp daddy line "Hey you, it's conference time, c'mere". She was cheating on her fiance, and I got in deep shit staggering in like 2 hours late, green to the gills with a hangover and a hickey for my Army Reserve drill. Girl felt guilty and would only make out with me when I got back home that night....but you were saying I don't recall exactly what is in the post above, but that's not it. Probably something like…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:33 AM
1

Yea yea, the other bot informed me. :D It's OK, I type fast and that was only about 20 seconds worth of abuse from me. :D
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 08:49 PM
1

:D There literally isn't a fucking valid point ANYWHERE in your "criticism" you pathetic worthless ass sucking simp brain dead Putin Asset Useful Idiot. You seriously shouldn't have gotten out of middle school with a clear deficit in critical thinking and analytical skills. You DEMONSTRABLY and OBVIOUSLY: Are unable to read as there is documentation for my 20% et al. assertions in the linked article...which links to scholarly research. Don't understand basic mathematics and how an AVERAGE works.…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 07:57 PM
0

I'm actually a Democrat...HOWEVER will partially agree with you that the "wokies" are nothing self-serving shitbags. As a Biden Democrat I'd politely request all to recognize that propaganda notwithstanding WE (the wing with actual power) are mostly interested in national security, national defense, jobs and the economy, infrastructure, racial issues....WE also hate them.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:21 PM
2

I'm VERY tangentially pro-choice, on general liberty principles...also in solidarity with President Biden. That said, all the nice words about "freedom, equality and liberty" is in reality basically "freedom to be a cum dumpster" as culturally white American women in the absence of anything restraining them revert to primate behavior generally giving a 4 on 1 "sex party" to 20% of "sexy males" while generally "exploiting" the other 80% in various ways, most notably providing a house and lifestyl…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 05:42 PM
1

Duly noted, thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 04:46 PM
0

Good stuff! Excellent work compiling all of this. I'd intuited it, having a "fight to the death" argument with some airhead bint over me DARING to suggest that "slut shaming" and '"stigma" are justified as they obviously predict an above average propensity to commit infidelity in committed relationships. Also I'm too lazy to Google scholar this stuff. :D
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:43 PM
1

Sure...if you're an illogical babbling imbecile whose words don't have any value beyond the energy it took to pound on the keys. Seriously, most of you people shouldn't have graduated middle school without some kind of a basic understanding of logic and critical thinking. Your teachers must have been worn out from their side gig stripping.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 04:38 PM
3

:D You're a simpy twat, pathetic suck ass, and a babbling airhead. Professors aren't primary school teachers. Invalid apples to oranges comparison. At what point did I look down on TEACHERS? Red Herring I'm just SURE we're going to change human nature. Freakouts (E.g. "slut shaming", stigma) over (loosely) aberrant sexual behavior are normal and natural as those behaviors predict anti-social behavior like infidelity and presenting a male partner with another man's biological offspring as his own…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/22 04:33 PM
6

Yes. All the other ones manage without sex work. You're all sanctimonious, but in reality as a typical hypocrite, you would hit the ceiling finding out that one of YOUR kid's teachers has 'dildoing myself' videos floating around. In addition to a respect and discipline issue, it also subject's the teacher to blackmail. Think it's a good idea to have say a little pack of 10 year old boys able to get their teacher fired at any time? What possible trouble could the horny little bastards get into wi…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/22 11:53 PM
5

I'm GenX and it's called "reality". Talk all the crap you like, but I guarantee if you had a choice between two lawyers to hire to get you off on a murder beef you're going to choose the one without an OF account. Hell some places, even having a "side gig" is at least suspect as it implies you're not good enough at what you do to make a living at it.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/22 07:42 PM
1

It's not "cause effect" as the same cause -"mirror neurons" generating 'empathy' creates different reactions. The "variable" is how the Ego is configured (proving it's involvement) whether it wants to "identify" with being "nice and kind" or "tough and realistic"....note that neither perspective is absolutely wrong or right. For example, a relative of mine is TOO sympathetic, getting hurt and angry every time she sees like a cute and furry tree sloth getting munched by a cheetah on television...…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 07:10 PM
1

-Incidentally, if you're not in the US, these conditions are probably +less+ prevalent. Best guess is probably a combination of things including cultural (we have VERY high aggregate narcissism in the US and have been for decades been conveying something like "Every girl is a PRINCESS" in our pop culture), and other factors. Someone I know maintains that continental Europe is a MUCH more mature and reasonable society because of the collective experience of the World Wars. ...my anecdotal experie…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 04:38 PM
1

Again thank you. And fair warning, I'm not always so "reasonable" :D
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 04:26 PM
1

Ahh again, it's a matter of being "egodystonic" or "egosystonic"...remember I pointed out that the way someone whose Ego is configured like a hardcore conservative to view the objectively experienced empathy (coming from mirror neurons-you FEEL what the other person is experiencing) .........as "egodystonic" (not in agreement with the Ego) viewing "sympathy" as "soft and weak" and they have made themselves "big" by configuring an identity where they are "tough" and feeling sympathy for other thi…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 04:20 PM
2

:D and the award is the LAST thing I expected, thank you....usually people scream "mysoginist" at me. Let me also add to the above that the detailed arrangement largely isn't pleasant or efficacious for women either, as roughly 60% are "batting out of their league"...they can usually get sex from the "sexy boys", but most often they get "ghosted" trying to connect with him in a relationship. I've seen videos on Youtube of for example a passably attractive woman who I'm sure has many good qualiti…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 02:45 PM
1

Your 'bad feeling' comes from encountering something in reality that is Egodystonic to your perceived preferences, or views about yourself. If you allow it to be without changing if it is within your power, then you feel guilt. Guilt is the emotion of "I didn't measure up to expectations"....it makes you 'small'. Maybe it's clearer to see with like an example of sexuality. For example presume a man's identity is heterosexual. Say he while drunk goes down on another man. This is EGODYSTONIC or no…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 02:29 PM
1

OK, let's do this, quick and dirty summation, it's a sort of "concise" proof: The only way to escape the Ego is "present moment awareness" (Buddhism as I understand it, authorities Eckhart Tolle, Alan Watts, mindfulness) This is VERY rare in almost everyone..usually only a few moments in a lifetime, some never. The Ego, while functioning does it's job (any explanation-Freud) "embiggening" So everything filtered through the ever present Ego is "embiggening" Regarding "sympathy" (and empathy which…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 01:26 PM
2

Heh I was expecting an argument-I was as "reasonable" as I could be. Suffice it to say I wasn't born "me"-created with a large amount of diverse formal education and half a century of life experience will tend to do that ...also there are different domains...I'm good at "talking" but can't dance, play a guitar, cross stich or understand mechanical engineering.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 01:23 PM
1

Ahhh that's a tall order. It's "understood", but I couldn't think of anywhere that it's so expressly stated, and there aren't really "facts" in psychology. Even like physical 'neuro' stuff tends to be somewhat conjectural as the human consciousness is this far still largely a mystery. Like we THINK (and there is some evidence) that some neurological assemblages are the physical "homes" of the "complexes" that Jung theorized, but to at least the extent of my knowledge absolute and definitive "pro…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 03:45 AM
3

Sure. Here is some information. Bear in mind that I am speaking in 'typical', 'generalities' and 'averages'.....certainly there are individual examples that don't look like this, like a younger very attractive female friend of mine who married in her mid-twenties her second real boyfriend who (scrawny and geeky) wasn't especially "sexy" by common standard. But the exception proves the rule. https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/ In the absence of something…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 10:29 PM
1

Umm I don't mean to appeal to my own authority but let's suffice it to say I get paid for this sort of thing and know what I'm talking about. Pretty much ALL human behavior if not directly seeking something (e.g. food necessary for sustenance) is in service to the Ego. Even for example perfunctorily "selfless" actions like say Bill Gates giving $10 Billion to AIDS research in Africa are in service to his sense of self and by extension "legacy" ("The 'me' that will be here after my death will sti…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 08:40 PM
2

It's difficult to be completely wrong, or completely right. Another way to characterize this is that historically women have been 'malignant' towards "whores" (women who sell their 'charms', or give them away "easy") as this diminishes the "market value" of women who withold them from men to their own benefit (e.g. "Put a ring on me if you want it".) A "modern" manifestation of this is denigrating "PickMEES" who attempt to gain advantage over other women with lip service to male perspectives. Bu…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 08:16 PM
2

Actually most technically you probably are right in a certain sense. All behavior is goal directed. As few or no women will actually witness the "white knighting" being exhibited the actual "goal" being pursued is technically service to their own Ego, building themselves up as a "good guy who defends poor vulnerable defenseless" This "enbiggenment" may or may not be in direct service of getting a woman's favor. Like "As a really good guy who defends poor defenseless women on the internet, I DESE…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 07:51 PM
2

It was a roundabout setup to slam the 'simp' . You claimed "every defense of women..." a generality With which I responded a generality "ANY criticism of "hyper-opressed long suffering culturally white women is verboten"
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 07:12 PM
4

Taking your comment as in good faith, I'd say partially it's largely justifiable backlash at massively hypocritical double standards. Culturally white women (mostly) have historically complained about porn being "exploitative" at women. ...Until they are able to benefit from it, at which time, it becomes "a bad thing" that not enough men are patronizing. Additionally I'd argue that (due to a somewhat complex dynamic related to hypergamy I'd be happy to explain) this is many women's first time ex…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 07:00 PM
2

You and 'objective reality' REALLY need to get introduced. As a Centrist Democrat (with political views in line with mostly black women) I ASSURE you that any kind of view on the Left dominated prevailing culture that DARES to question the mythos that culturally white women aren't the epitome of long suffering selfless perfection is verboten. Notice incidentally that I specified 'culturally white'.....this would not be inclusive of for example a white female Moldovan/Romanian immigrant "fresh of…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 06:24 PM
15

FWIW my personal experience would validate this. Even 35 or so years ago, the only scholarship myself a straight white male qualified for was a little tiny one very kindly offered by my grade school principal and his wife my first grade teacher. Generally speaking, (culturally white American) women have from at least GenX been having their cake and eating it, often "abusing" freedoms, "enhancements", and "protections" offered to them, while conveniently ignoring all of their privileges' and adva…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 05:47 PM
5

Why does being on the "sugar and spice" side mean that you're automatically indisputably right and no other point of view whatsoever deserves any consideration whatsoever? That anyone DARING to even slightly and politely suggest anything other that (culturally white American) women are perfect selfless saints who live in a state of suffering oppression MUST be a shitbag mysoginist?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 05:13 PM
1

If you say so.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 04:10 PM
2

Get off your fucking high horse, you sanctimonious asswipe. While 'incels' typically do have some problems, the biggest one is that the "sin" of being "average" (which definitionally 50% are below) means that generally a woman is inaccessible until they get old enough that they can't compete with younger women for the top 20% "sexy badboys". (Edit) If anyone sees this after the commenter deleted, I was planning to point out that if the 64 in their username was their DOB their subjective personal…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 03:55 PM
1

You understand that your OPINION isn't an absolute indisputable "truth" right?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:41 PM
6

Yes yes, I know you think that your self-serving opinions and value judgments are absolute indisputable TRUTHS.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 03:40 PM
19

Something that gets overlooked A LOT is "low end housing discrimination"...."broke" women tend to have A LOT more options for the cheapest little studio on the market, close quarters sharing, exchanging light labor for housing..... To be fair some of this is intrinsic (e.g. reasonable for a little old lady to not want a strange man in her house)....but it's an unaddressed inequity.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 03:33 PM
6

True to a certain extent, but you sanctimonious asswipes (especially you pathetic ass sucking man bunned simps kissing up)........thinking that you can dictate your opinions and value judgments over legitimate grievances is at least 50% of the problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 03:24 PM
11

When they figure out that market forces push more and more into full blown prostitution which breaks the monopoly (or 'cartel') and price fixing ability that allows them to dictate the price of 'pussy' .........they still aren't going to give you pathetic ass kissing man-bunned simps any love.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 03:14 PM
1

I view this as a good thing. Part of the reason (at least from my day GenX) is ('culturally white') women have gotten away with bloody murder is basically having a monopoly on pussy, and can dictate (loosely) "prices". Being able to "just pay for it" would diminish the fuck out of all the 'simp' energy floating around.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 02:59 PM
0

Brilliant observation
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/22 02:56 PM
2

Kinda depends how old you are. If you're 25 you've got likely 20+ years to enjoy the money after you're released. If you're 50, you'll be lucky to get out of prison alive. Also depends on what kind of prison....go learn about Damien Echols almost 20 years on death row. He got out, but has many nasty health problems including vision, dental, digestive, neurological still plaguing him today.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/22 06:30 PM
1

Well OK.....I might add also that all of this shit people are wrestling over, basically if him getting killed/hurt was a reasonably foreseeable consequence is a matter for a JURY to decide under the laws of the state where the potential offense occurred. It's very telling how many people apparently don't want her in front of that jury.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 05:56 PM
1

She is still at a minimum an intrinsic link in the chain of communication, and her highly probable whackjob histrionic response to what was PROBABLY nothing by the standard of a reasonable observer is an intrinsic cause in what happened. Incidentally this isn't definitive proof, but I've observed young African American men in the South speaking to their probably only 41-42 year old father with "Yassuh" (Yes SIR). If this level of courtly formality is displayed NOW, 65 years later by that subcult…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:25 PM
6

-and a "catcall" isn't even close to justifying that kind of reaction, even back then.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:20 PM
5

Didn't say it was a patient. And it wasn't. And the reason I didn't exactly say what I was and do is that every clueless imbecile on the planet comes out of the woodwork thinking they know better than I do about what is and isn't proper.....people who actually know what they are talking about ADORE all you social media "lawyers", "doctors", "epidemiologists", "political and international relations experts"........ (Edit) Also, a case in point demonstration of "crazy" showing how you literally ju…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:49 PM
-1

Changes nothing. Also there is Sexual Assault that justifies that type of a reaction (rape and other forcible penetrations, MAYBE full on grabbing breasts)......and also there is "sexual assault" like a woman who went viral trying to accuse a little black boy of grabbing her ass...he MAY have brushed against her. In all probability it resembled the latter. Further, the fact that her husband is 'batshit crazy' (freakishly emotionally reactive) is an indication that she is too, as we tend to marry…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:20 PM
-1

Here's the thing...as someone more than passably sophisticated (to the "I get paid" level) in psychology I can tell you that 'subjective reactions' very often don't have very much to do with objective reality. I've myself seen for example someone (a woman in this case-they're MORE prone to 'crazy' although don't have a monopoly on it) literally borderline hallucinate something like "I'm going to stalk you." from an innocuous statement about where their home was relative to her workplace. It is I…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:04 PM
13

The Left (which I'm technically part of) cries about "stochastic terrorism" when Trump siccs potentially murderous psycho-mobs on people, but now you want to exempt Karen for what is tantamount for exactly the same thing. As usual, having the cake and eating it. And I SEVERELY doubt that a 14 year old boy (black in a racially oppressive time) did anything that a grown woman reasonably needs to worried about. And who the fuck are you to dictate what "true justice" is? Typical sanctimonious presum…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:06 PM
1

You saw my edit about education right? Ahh we find her and Bernie basically pandering loudmouth blowhards, VERY willing to talk big, identify and criticize obvious problems, and make promises they can't themselves deliver on. They tend to stand around screaming at other legislators to "fix things" instead of themselves taking action to create the changes they talk about. Oh AOC did at least one time on MSNBC, harshly scold people who don't understand and fully accept that "Not all women menstrua…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 04:59 AM
7

Happy that you chose to engage in a productive manner. Ahh I was speaking in generalities, she's somewhat the figurehead for that side of the party and 'wokie gynocentric sillyness'. Off the top of my head I can't think of anything particularly misandrist that she's said or done. (Edit-off the top of my head probably 'gynocentric' is mostly coming out of Liz Warren's supporters) Incidentally I peeked at your posts...looks like you post a fair bit about gender and sexuality stuff. I'm myself supp…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 01:26 AM
-26

Hi...I've been pointing out to other gentlemen that the centrist "Biden wing" (the one that has actual power) of the "Left" has basically NONE of the whackjob gynocentric BS. It's mostly African Americans who tend to be more pragmatic, religious, traditional, etc. We're mostly concerned about national security and national defense, some racial issues, jobs, infrastructure etc. Pretty much all wokie whackjob freakshow gynocentric and other idiocy is coming from the "AOC" side, and (e.g. "LatinX")…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 12:24 AM
7

PS I'm thinking about the relationship between what you pointed out, the (no-fault) "losers" created by the Great Recession and "OnlyFans". Perhaps it's like a cycle of "providers" got obliterated by the recession and they had to pick up the slack of a shortage of exploitable providers by basically becoming 'whores'. :D This actually makes me feel better as there tends to be "justice" as (unless they're able to hide it) sex-worker past tends to shoot them in the ass affecting their marriageabili…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 11:12 PM
4

'Stuff' tends to be multifactorial so likely you're right....e.g. I'm sure that development of Tinder made things INFINITELY worse as women had no reason to ever "settle" with a non-stop flow of "opportunities" (although they are usually 'fucked and chucked') with "sexy boys"...no reason to EVER bother with one of the boring "unworthy" ones.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 10:48 PM
8

I like to point out that your average/typical man de facto subsidizes the average/typical woman's running/'whoring' around in her 20's as he sits home alone and developing an income stream/wealth with 'serious' work while she's typically at like Starbucks...then when she "settles" he buys her a house and provides a lifestyle that her "barista money" could never pay for. Also she is intrinsically 'ripping him off' by choosing to voluntarily enter a "sellers market" where she has intense competiti…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 10:29 PM
5

I'm neither puritan nor prude but there are certain public facing placing roles in society where an intrinsic part of the role is to be taken seriously as they are entrusted with important responsibility. Making yourself an 'adult performer' is disqualifying as it per common and typical perception 'beclowns'. Would you want to see your say...patent attorney having an OnlyFans?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 09:14 PM
7

I belong to a couple of psychologist message boards. It's actually become an issue among "supervisors" (experienced psychologists qualified to oversee juniors) to figure out what the hell to do about their 20 something female trainees (who are seeing patients) having an Onlyfans.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 08:51 PM
3

This is interesting. I've kind of been on a kick about hypergamy, the I believe primate behavior homo sapien females exhibit where 80% choose to only mate with the 20% most attractive males if something (tradition, arranged marriage, threat of unwanted pregnancy) doesn't constrain them. I wonder about the interplay here. I suspect this hypergamy is partially at the base of a LOT of the problems we have as a society including the school shootings, rising fascism... https://quillette.com/2019/03/1…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 08:12 PM
1

Run along. You can pretend to be a serious person somewhere else.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 09:00 PM
1

They are yes generally more accurate reflections of reality. But as you yet even again clearly can't (not even close) differentiate your opinions and value judgements from "absolute truth"/"objective reality" I'm not particularly concerned about your opinion.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:35 PM
1

I view him as a 'Putin asset' (he was named in the Mueller report, informed of the election interference on his behalf which he did nothing about with his supporters) and generally an ineffectual 'do nothing' blowhard buffoon who makes lots of noises and big promises (damaging us as he puts off potential Democratic voters "Biden COULD change us into Finland with the whip of a pen, but he WON'T so why should I vote for him?) without any real capacity to deliver. But not looking to start a fight o…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 06:07 PM
1

:D You think that and even fancy and reputable survey data is "Word of God" and indisputable absolute truth? There are potential biases in how the questions are asked (fairly well known that "results" can do a 180 if questions are asked a different way), and also also there is (I can't remember exact name-not "swimming" in this stuff every day) "selection bias" where like people who are maybe opposed to something but don't have super strong feelings about it and don't care to provide survey resu…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:49 PM
1

You know it occurred to me to point out re: "hobbyist"...you're waving around things that have come off Google Scholar like they're the Word of God. If you were actually 'in the know' you would have a sense of perspective about their actual value. One of the first things that they teach you in a research method's class is that any time that you see a (very common) big block of "wonky" math instead of a simple t-test to find significance it's because they had to do some "bullshit gymnastics" to m…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:43 PM
1

See this is actually what I was hoping to accomplish. Despite what you are hearing in probably right wing oriented media, the faction with the actual power (African Americans-elected Biden, not Bernie or Liz Warren) as a whole don't have that much disagreement with loosely 'men'. 'We' (I'm a white male, but politically a 'Biden Democrat') also are sick of fighting over "silly assed" performative liberalism including in my view unnecessary (it's obvious you are "he" or "she" unless you are Lilly …
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:07 PM
2

:D That is a good and clever assessment, you're probably right. There is sort of an aspect of "Don't throw me in the briar patch"...not quite right but you probably know what I mean.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:51 PM
1

The point of the Indian doctor thing is seeing that even though you CAN "steal" their good assets (e.g. with high US wages), you shouldn't as obviously a huge poor country is going to be without doctors...analogous to not "stealing" desirable black men from black women as they need them. It maybe wasn't SO evident and compelling. These things don't tend to be absolutes, and it's difficult to be completely wrong or right..e.g. you're not exactly +wrong+ (certainly you have "free will") with like …
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:19 PM
1

:D See there you already know the stinky boring guy who paints DND miniatures. You're steps ahead. Alright, alright I'll take it down a notch and be reasonable...honestly though out of "abuse mode' you were pretty much just punching keys up there. Can you really not see for example where the "India doctor" thing is a relevant "moral analogy" to "African American women"? And although I was being extremely dismissive and kind of a dick, it DOES appear that you have a pretty serious logical fallacy…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:25 AM
1

Ummm OK.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 08:07 PM
1

Blah blah blah blah, bunch of words. Becky's at least culturally white woman pussy SAYS SO , whatever, ad hominem "racist", strawman about sex or sexual affirmation from strangers, inapplicable red herring about violence, poverty (Rising MAGA Fascists have an 80K average income-I don't believe it's a major factor in school shootings either although INCEL certainly is) .........and single mother's ​ .......don't take even a moment to consider the validity of anything I spent hours working (multit…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:45 PM
3

:D You're the second simpering "special boy" (?) to accuse me of that on this thread. Do you have a man bun? I'm afraid I've been laying pipe since after a Journey concert out behind my former grade school with my martial arts instructor's slightly older daughter in his car.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:18 PM
1

AGAIN I am NOT in any way discouraging or forbidding interracial dating-strawman. However there are certain ugly realities of that situation you are willfully refusing to acknowledge. Unfortunately MOST men of other races (yes there are exceptions including in my own family-I don't endorse this as "correct" but unfortunately TRUE) don't want to marry African American women. Fugly white girls (yes a generality-and stuff is multifactorial too) "picking off" their most desirable men with "higher so…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:55 PM
1

Could be.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:47 PM
0

Not even close. Those guys are narcissistic clowns full of laughable attribution bias and mistaking proximity for causation like "I did this special technique and a girl fucked me in 10 minutes so the special technique caused it" ....What actually caused it is you're 28, 6'2 with a sixpack and at least look successful while she's drunk and 35 pounds overweight thrilled that a "hot guy" will have anything to do with her even briefly. I don't mean to sound like a commercial for mail order brides, …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:44 PM
1

I've not seen it, spending significant time in that part of the world. Sample of one, but "trashiest ho" (Married older rich foreigner, cheated and stole him blind) I've encountered was Belarussian. Not overly fond of Russians right now for obvious reasons, but even there, have never had a problem with their women.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:20 PM
1

I suspect you're getting some kind of a skewed sample somehow....not a Ukraine expert, but it seems illogical that there is something special about Ukraine that makes it's women substantially different from other Slavic countries in the region.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:07 PM
1

That's basically the gist of my point.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:03 PM
1

So you think that it is reasonable and proportionate to have a man's career and potentially life, ruined, have him face a massive and guilty until proven innocent inquisition over any say an agenda motivated dubiously evidenced accusation? Or even if he did (gasp) mildly annoy a woman with sexual overtones. That's very telling.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:00 PM
1

OK OK, You're missing my point. Transferring the RISK which allows women to unreasonably speculate on mating partners (presuming they are seeking to acquire an out of their league permanent partner) back onto women creates an incentive to be REASONABLE in their choices. Women's "pickiness" is typically for "sexy" which in no way, shape or form resembles partner/parent suitability, most typically more a function of clownishly overconfident narcissism and 'privilege' (E.g. I have a little, easy ov…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:43 AM
1

Most of what you've posted actually supports what I'm saying. I'm not sure why you're bringing most of it up. YES women (80%) are having lots and lots of sex because it is their only "leverage" as they compete against other women on average 4/1 for the 20% they collectively deigned "sex-worthy" and "mating worthy"... :D I won't get into "lying about number of sexual partners" .... Rule of 3 is applicable, divide men/3, and multiply X 3 it for women to get the real numbers. Also the dating site s…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:15 AM
1

Heh, I've heard tale of a certain Midwestern college campus that is gay paradise with tons of little "nooks and crannies" where you guys could go hook up randomly pretty much around the clock. Someone I know had this exchange with a young gay male friend: "I'm going to get lunch, want to come with me? Naaa I'm gonna go get laid." :D I'm sure being gay isn't paradise, but in some ways you guys don't know how good you have it.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:30 AM
1

Moi? I've been laying pipe since after a Journey concert in '86. Got my martial arts instructor's slightly older daughter out behind my grade school.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:12 AM
2

You are certainly free to do that, and the general welfare I'm sure appreciates you reducing the supply of exploitable 'not-Chads'. But that said, it's only the ridiculous "market distortion" they create that allows them to behave like they do (giving ALL the 'sexual favor' to the 20% most desirable men)..men shouldn't need to be "substantially above average" to engage in basic human experience until some woman decides that she is ready to "settle" for him after being sometimes discarded by hund…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:11 PM
2

I make similar points in thread comments.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:02 PM
2

Most probably the writers, producers, etc., are just trying to produce a show that is popular and gets renewed so they don't have to go looking for new overpaid jobs. But that said, it's telling that they thought this sentiment would be appealing to an audience presumably women. If it's any consolation, largely "the party is over" for 'culturally white' women with massively abusing the protections and privileges' that have been afforded to "protect" them. The abortion ruling substantially increa…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:01 PM
-5

Untrue. GENERALLY Slavic women from still mostly traditional countries are MUCH more reasonable, less selfish, equitable, kind-spirited, etc. But that said, there are trashy whores in every country...and usually the ones you are going to meet somehow "seeking foreign men" are going to tend to be the latter....generally speaking if it seems "too good to be true" (E.g. She's 19 and hot, you're 62, fat ugly and rich) it's generally going to be.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:31 PM
7

I actually (usually outside the US in a country that is more traditional and equitable to men) CHOOSE to do this as a courtesy, for example at night telegraphing my intention to exit public transportation so it's clear to nearby women that I am not following her out at her stop, creating unnecessary anxiety. But that said (especially in US) should I fail to do this "Fuck em"....NOBODY is responsible for anyone else's goddamn FEELINGS... A precept of a major branch of psychology is that nobody ca…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:18 PM
4

Ahhh you aren't the first one to make an observation of this type...there are lots of jokes about how even wholesomely "becoming a wife" is a form of prostitution as the woman traditionally exchanged sex, companionship, reproduction etc. for money, shelter. Of course a healthier way to look at it is as a "partnership". Also there are jokes about "all of us are whores" as we all exchange "ourselves" for money in being paid for work. If it is any consolation, I can tell you that inside a committed…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:22 PM
3

I call em like I see em.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:01 PM
0

I have an alternate suggestion, if you would like to get good results and effectively promote your interests rather than promote a political party. Instead of this, make alliance with the Biden Democrats, who are mostly African American women. This VERY powerful bloc (they elected President Biden, beating out "feminist whackjob" favorites Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren) is in a vicious struggle with political extremists (e.g. AOC) is VERY much victimized by the current state of things, basically …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 05:51 PM
5

You kind of allude to yet even another point, yes funny....the men that the single woman are giving sex to are already "on their side" as the current order strongly benefits them with at any given time approximately 4 women are fighting over them. They are already "starving" (Yes this is an oversimplification, but valid generality) the men who "pro-life" are taking away their abortion access. ...so it's an empty threat.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:46 PM
1

As I've commented below, this is what is actually driving the "pro-life" movement, basically "getting white pussy under control". In reality nobody (except perhaps white supremacists concerned with white birth rates) gives a fuck about the goddamn fetuses. Reducing women's risk of carrying an unwanted pregnancy to zero (contraception and freely available abortion) had an unintended consequence of giving them freedom to "speculate" using their ability to exclusively grant "sexual favor" on very s…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 04:29 PM
1

I concur. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction, and evidence suggests (e.g. Depp verdict, Roe v. Wade falling-underlying motivation is "getting white pussy under control") that long overdue backlash is finally occurring.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:56 PM
3

(Edited to expand on points) I tend to focus more on "economic" perceptions relating to supply and demand, and the shorthand of "Chad" et al. is more convenient than a mouthful of "A member of the 20% of males, validated by dating site data who receive 80% of female 'interest', creating a problematic disequilibrium that has substantive aversive effect on society." "Cum dumpster" is crude, but an accurate depiction of the dynamic where 4/1 competition (excessive demand-narcissistically EVERY gene…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:37 PM
5

Right....see "hyper-motivated zealot"....and even they won't be long motivated to sabotague their own self-interest, especially as this is their primary motivation in "feminist patriarchy"....they are the ones who VERY STRONGLY feel that it is their God given right that their interest in "Chad" takes priority over the "common good" of all male homo sapiens to have a reasonable probability of finding an "appropriate" mating partner.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:22 PM
-6

PS RE alliance with black women...a LOT of the "racial friction" in the US has underlying motivation of mating competition, as un-selected white men resent "losing" even the less desirable white women to desirable black men...this "friction" gets their children killed. Black women (who form the backbone of the Democratic party-got Joe Biden elected over whackjob favorites Bernie Sanders and Liz Warren) would be VERY happy to diminish their competition from white women.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:00 PM
22

Smooth move. "I'm so EXTRA SPECIAL that it's going to go my way going after the guy with the microphone that the other 99% of people like enough to pay to see"...
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/21 09:59 PM
9

Fortunately there tend to be consequences for that kind of thing sooner or later. Again, every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/21 11:27 PM
105

Happy to see "equal and opposite reaction" finally hitting the world of online dating. Female abuse of the "market structure" has been beyond ridiculous for years. Yes, I know there are 50+ guys trying per day, but that doesn't mean that your ACTUAL relative value (which will come out in subsequent dates) is that fucking high you can just abuse "applicants". The "dance for my approval" shit is just the tip of the iceberg I heard a story recently about a woman inviting someone out on a Sunday aft…
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/21 03:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/comments/r0sn3k/bullying\_someone\_and\_expecting\_no\_consequences/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/21 02:41 AM
13

Is that the edge of her nipple in the photo?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/21 11:08 PM
1

I cut her some slack as her content is actually OK (no clue as to her net worth), but did repress the urge to point out the massive dissonance between growing her account as a "hot girl" and complaining about unwanted sexual attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/21 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter