TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BigDamnHead Archive

View 6 posts and 96 comments by BigDamnHead on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

irrelevant unless she want to hurt him
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:21 PM
1

Is there a point to this quote? I definitely read the entire article.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:35 AM
1

The author was anonymous and she was probably the person the story was told to.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:33 AM
2

I definitely have seen it. I am not saying it is a popular opinion on this sub, but I have definitely seen it.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:32 AM
1

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:00 PM
6

Yeah, I think it was great until point 5.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:45 PM
3

Completely agree.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:27 PM
17

I am sure it would be one hell of a quagmire.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:04 PM
6

I agree with you. I have seen some people advocate for that stance (matriarchy) on here, but I don't think it is inherently indicative of the movement. I don't believe in the matriarchy or patriarchy as they both seem to imply some secret group controlling things. I believe the gender roles that cause so many problems came about as a natural reflection of gender dimorphism. I don't think these roles should still exist, however. The fact that society managed to develop in a particular way does no…
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:04 PM
3

The fifth point is problematic in that it paints all men's groups as bad while saying that women's groups are only sometimes the problem. Otherwise I think it is a good read, and I am glad to see it on a more mainstream site.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:58 PM
1

Well damn. I will repost.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 05:29 PM
1

I am just saying that it is annoying that the mother is the default parent and the father is just a secondary.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:58 AM
0

Yeah it is. If this was a point of humor I wouldn't care, but it is something that is just accepted as though it is a social norm.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 11:30 PM
1

The link above your comment doesn't say that he believes adults having sex with children should be legal. He merely talks about those who have feelings for children but don't act on them.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 03:35 AM
2

That's what I assumed, but I wanted to give him/her a chance to prove their claims.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 09:38 PM
3

Any sources to back up these claims?
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:25 PM
-3

Wow, you really proved me wrong.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:49 PM
0

What was incorrect in my statement? Your statement doesn't contradict anything in mine. Maybe you should re-read mine.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:48 PM
0

There was not enough context in that sentence to determine that they meant Anglophone and not Anglo-Saxon. Being that "Western" is not synonymous with the English speaking world. Anglo is occasionally used incorrectly as synonymous with caucasian or white.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:16 PM
2

Anglo women? Like, women of English descent?
/r/MensRights13/01/15 07:03 PM
0

Well luckily he was downvoted to hell.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:36 PM
4

If there is an actual case of it happening, it isn't an urban legend. An anecdote doesn't prove it is widespread, but if verified, can prove it is something that does happen.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:28 PM
66

Why wouldn't it be okay for you to post? Anyone can say what they like and the upvotes and downvotes will weed out the bad comments. MensRights is a pretty open forum. Edit: added the word "it" in the first paragraph.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 07:26 PM
2

The foreskin starts out attached and should not ever be pulled back until it naturally detaches. It is like ripping off a fingernail. It will loosen and become detached when the child is ten-ish (sometimes earlier or later). While it is still attached hygiene isn't a problem since nothing can get under there (Just like a nail bed).
/r/MensRights17/12/14 04:57 PM
1

You are using the no true Scotsman fallacy. You are discounting the tumblrinas and university students because they aren't the real SJW's, like you are. Movements are comprised of many tiny voices. No one person does enough in a movement to matter, with maybe one or two exceptions. It is their combined speech that effects change. As such, any sufficiently large or loud group affects the narrative and cannot be discounted as not really being part of the group.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:32 PM
4

That's the problem. His wife had 8 months paid leave. He had 1 day of paid leave. He probably couldn't afford to take unpaid leave.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:01 PM
3

His wife got 8 months paid. He got 1 day paid. In both the US and Canada the mandatory leave doesn't have to be paid leave.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:00 PM
5

They mean infant circumcision. And yes, routine infant circumcision should be banned.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:07 PM
5

I think that is what they were getting at. Infant circumcision.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:07 PM
9

More importantly, lest we not forget, we are two women on a date Because if one of them was an actual male he would obviously need to be the one to pay.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 06:28 AM
5

That would be the only way. Probably have to provide a death certificate.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:33 PM
3

This isn't alimony and every time someone on here refers to it as such they defeat their own purpose. If the alimony laws were different it would affect this ruling, since it isn't alimony. If you are against what this woman is asking for, then you need to call for a change in laws concerning the distribution of marital assets.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:28 PM
4

This isn't alimony. She thinks it isn't enough because their combined worth was over 14 billion dollars. She thought a larger share was hers.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 06:26 PM
3

Equality is not just about rights but about responsibility.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:07 PM
2

Their women aren't physically different than women in the US. If the women in Israel can perform these roles than so can US women. Everything else is just training.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:05 PM
1

Do you understand the point of men's rights is equality? We aren't fighting to have more rights than women.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 03:02 PM
2

The agreement made when entering into a marriage is to combine efforts. Therefore anything resulting from the combined efforts are shared equally. Any pre-existing wealth and wealth gained not from combined efforts of funds isn't split. That is why she got 1/14 of the combined wealth and not half.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:48 PM
2

She was an executive at the same company for years.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:24 PM
0

Any increase in assets that comes from the efforts of either party are distributed equally. She got 1/14 of the combined wealth, after having been an executive at the company.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:22 PM
3

This isn't alimony, the title was wrong. The installment aspect of it was so that he didn't have to immediately dump a bunch of shares and hurt his company.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:20 PM
3

This isn't alimony. It is the division of marital assets, or did you just read the title and not the article?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:18 PM
2

She only got 1/14 of the combined assets. In Oklahoma women usually get over half.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:18 PM
1

Had he been worth that coming in, she wouldn't have gotten as much. The issue is that the wealth was attained while they were together.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:16 PM
3

This isn't alimony. This is a division of marital assets. He can pay it all now if he likes.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:12 PM
5

This isn't alimony. Alimony is a monthly stipend to allow someone to keep a standard of living. This is the split of marital assets. The judge is being nice in not making him pay a lump sum. Alimony comes from monthly income, this is the splitting of assets already owned.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:07 PM
3

I live in Oklahoma and this makes me so happy.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:05 AM
6

What happens when some nutjob who is really in to birds decides that since he can't get in by himself, he is just going to kidnap some kid to bring with him?
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:48 AM
6

It isn't feminist inspired, but pedophilia hysteria is something that does greatly affect men.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:47 AM
3

The last couple of lines make it seem like the worst part of this is that we can't know how awful he really is or counter his obvious lies because we don't know the accusation.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 08:30 PM
1

Of course they don't, it would shatter the notion that anyone can make it to the top if they want.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 06:29 PM
11

I am a liberal man. I am also an MRA. I believe in complete legal equality between the sexes. I don't think anyone should be put into a box based on how they were born. I am against gender roles. In many areas, I agree with feminists of the past. I just don't think modern feminism is fighting for real equality, and even if they were they aren't focusing on the issues that affect men negatively.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:43 PM
1

I stopped reading as soon as it reference traditional Chinese medicine.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:47 PM
2

If an individual wants to live that way and those around them do too, then they should be allowed to. It should have no preferred legal standing and in no way should be mandated.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 11:29 PM
1

Hetero based movement? Do gay men not have to deal with circumcision? Do gay men not have to register for the draft? Are gay men given the same leniency in court as women? Are gay men not assumed to be child predators unless proven otherwise like other males? Is it easier for a gay man to adopt? This isn't the hetero men's rights subreddit, it is the men's rights subreddit. All men. Also, I believe you may need to brush up on punctuation usage.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:54 PM
2

Good luck with that. They probably won't be.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:08 PM
38

I think this is a good article. I don't necessarily think it has to do with Mens Rights. It seems more about some ways in which feminism has failed women, which is a good topic, to be sure. Men's Rights, however, is not a sub that is dedicated to pointing out the problems and flaws in feminism, it is about promoting men's rights. Often these two purposes coincide, but they are not the same. Men had plenty of problems prior to feminism. Unless we are advocating for a return to classic gender role…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:02 PM
8

in which he uses a fake hand to grab womens butts He has a fake hand, but he uses his real hand to grab the butts. The fake hand is the distraction.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:09 PM
5

A "pussy pass", as you say, is exactly what you are giving her since you base it off the fact that she is a female and "oh well, she didn't know any better and females aren't in as much control". Women are equal to men and should be held to the same standards. This is just like that rich kid that got off because his parents "never taught him right from wrong".
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:14 AM
5

As long as no permanent damage was done That is the line most use to justify female on male violence. They believe it is fine for a woman to abuse a man because most of the time he isn't permanently or drastically physically hurt.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:09 AM
4

Well he did use the 7 to 3 statistic, so he did bring it up that it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 03:05 AM
1

Rape is a state crime, not a federal one. Many state definitions of rape include being made to penetrate. Also, this person got a clarification from the FBI that the new definition includes being made to penetrate since the definition doesn't say which person is the victim, just that a penetration has to occur. http://tamenwrote.wordpress.com/2014/04/04/fbi-clarifies-definition-of-rape/
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:33 PM
1

I read a statement a while back where the FBI says that their definition includes made to penetrate as it doesn't specify that the one being penetrated is the victim, just that a penetration has taken place.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:24 PM
1

I really don't think doctors do. Plenty of doctors take their oath seriously.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:54 AM
19

He didn't say how a doctor could legally get away with it. He asked how a doctor could morally justify it.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 04:53 PM
21

I read that as meaning he doesn't want to live in that kind of bullshit world. Not that he was for it and willing to sacrifice himself for the cause. Maybe I am wrong.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:22 AM
4

/r/theredpill is awful. I hope they don't seek it out. The fact that this sub is constantly grouped with /r/theredpill is probably one of the biggest problems with our image.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 05:22 PM
2

At least they will have a chance of knowing. Whereas now it is usually just a crapshoot.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:46 PM
5

Teen pregnancy rate would drop to zero. If there aren't any side effects and it is, in fact reversible, I would be fine with it being mandatory. That, of course, is unlikely the case, though. Also, the reversing would have to be covered by the fee to perform it initially.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:44 PM
1

Firstly, this is a thread about people hitting each other, not shooting each other. Secondly, why is it only probably not justifiable when it is switched to the girlfriend shooting the boyfriend, but presented as definitely not justifiable when the boyfriend shoots? It was used as a reductio ad absurdum argument in the case of the boyfriend shooting, but in the case of the girlfriend shooting it becomes unclear?
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:59 PM
1

I don't think it is always that easy to gauge how much is needed to stop the threat.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:46 PM
4

She seems great, though.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:43 AM
1

I agree, I was just speculating on why some people were downvoting it.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:38 AM
3

Maybe people see it as furthering the notion that if a man is raped it must be by another man. I don't think that it is doing that, but maybe others do.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 09:00 PM
2

I am pretty sure I read something about a woman who took male hormone treatments as an experiment and was amazed at how quickly her sex drive changed.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:11 PM
1

This article is 14 years old.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 01:54 PM
2

I am one of those liberals, and this is what I am trying to do.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 12:28 AM
1

No she won't. No one gives a woman who hits a man any real condemnation. Just a lot of "well maybe she took the breakup hard. Who knows how he was to her." They may not approve of what she did, but nothing will really come of it. Nothing like if he had slapped her.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:27 PM
1

Accost does not mean unwanted verbal harassment. It just means to speak to boldly. It can mean just to speak to.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:19 PM
-1

There is another article posted on this sub that does, indeed, point to the divorces as being relevant to his suicide.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:38 PM
8

They are attributing part of his decades of depression and drug use to his exes.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:16 PM
2

and other "patients" FTFY
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:42 PM
6

It's hard to say something is an "American" thing, usually. There are ten times more people in the US than in Canada, so there is quite a bit of regional variation.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 07:49 PM
1

What about situations where it is one man saying it to another man with no women involved?
/r/MensRights23/02/14 09:36 PM
14

Yeah, it is really misleading when they combine three groups against one. Adult females, female children, and male children. Until I see what the separated figures are, I too am calling bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:24 PM
2

It isn't considered rape by the FBI (although the laws in many states differ as rape isn't a federal crime) but it is sexual assault. A different, possibly lesser, charge, but one that still includes the concept of consent.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:40 PM
-10

You understand it goes both ways right? By consent, they mean the legal definition of consent, which is required for sex. A man who is drunk also can't consent. If both parties are drunk, it is the one who initiated, which is often impossible to determine in court. Due to biases in the justice system, this is sometimes ignored, but in principle it is there.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:21 PM
1

I need men's rights because [my mom assumes that my sister is in danger and needs to dial 911 because I am violent and dangerous because I am a male] -FTFY edit: FTFY
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:17 AM
3

I don't think occasionally having Ben and Jerry's to make himself feel better is going to significantly harm him. Had he implied he did this daily or in large quantities, there might be reason for concern. You have no idea whether or not it is even a habit. Also, he didn't ask for advice in the situation. All he did is say that now he sees why men's rights is a worthwhile cause. He tries to share a story about something bad that happened to him with a community that would understand his anger, a…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:13 AM
5

"It is men’s responsibility to create spaces to discuss men’s issues, not to invade women’s spaces and demand they tailor their content to fit; that men are surprised when they come to a female-focused site, read commentary about issues that relate specifically to women, and find no discussion of how rape/abortion/divorce/domestic violence affects men is their problem." Isn't this the same reasoning women rallied against when they first started entering male dominated fields and tried to gain ac…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 12:35 PM
1

Generation X and many Millennials are adults now. In fact, the leading edge of Gen X is in their 50's. Only the latter half to third of Millenials are still being "brought up". Your point still comes across, though.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 04:16 PM
11

The person said the article was hilarious. The article was from ebaumsworld, so could very well be a comedic article lampooning the female teachers. The "2 words: Self Control!" adds to my thinking that it might be the case. I tried finding the article on ebaumsworld, but was unsuccessful.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 06:38 AM
3

This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach. The situation brings back bad memories. My mother used my siblings and me (we had different fathers) to hurt and manipulate our fathers. She was so manipulative and made me feel like shit. I am glad he was able to get out when he did. Although he will probably have to deal with years of emotional blackmail as she tries to regain control. I hope he stays strong. I didn't leave till after junior year of high school.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:15 AM
1

Or just vote to change the law.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:33 PM
1

Better that the point should be made now when it won't show up on a permanent record and ruin her life. Kids need to learn that anytime they assault someone there is potential for permanent injury.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 02:22 PM
5

It wasn't a schoolyard disagreement, it was assault. If a woman kicked me in the crotch, I would press charges. Why should he not have the same justice? They are in eighth grade. She is most likely close to her adult size and is certainly old enough to understand right from wrong. If they were in elementary school, I might agree with you.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 03:00 PM
4

I think the respondents that took the survey have a false sense of what makes a man "mature". The median video game player is over 30. They may see it as immature because when they were younger the adult men they saw didn't play games while the male children around them did play games. The logic is faulty, though, since the reason these older people didn't play games was because they didn't play them growing up. I don't think men can be held to the same standard of "maturity" as they once were. …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter