TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Big_Passenger_7975 Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by Big_Passenger_7975 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, you cannot have sex whenever you want with money. Prostitution is a jailable offense, especially for the buyer, in most of the world, and it is not easy to find a safe, reliable service where it's illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 02:35 AM
-7

I get that you types don't like circumcision. But calling it mutilation is idiotic. The penis is perfectly functional.
/r/MensRights17/05/23 08:36 AM
1

If it's available for everyone, why are you calling it redpill fanfiction? Even if you take steps to be a good husband and father, divorce still happens. I don't know what world you live in, but whatever reasons exist to get married can easily be voided by better policies turned into law
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/23 09:55 AM
8

Is that including prison? Because jail and prison are not the same
/r/MensRights30/04/23 03:14 PM
0

It's not original. If anything, it is a very obvious thought process. There is no other reason to tell a morbidly obese person they are perfect they way they are unless you are trying to sort them up for failure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 03:40 AM
1

No, every other job is legal. There are industry regulations that are required by people to follow, all the time. And if they don't, they are held liable and fined accordingly. Even hair dressers, the people you are comparing prostitutes with, need licensing to be able to do their job. So you are liar at worst and ignorant at best.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:27 AM
1

Doesn't matter that you think that. What matters is the actual research. The fact that you took that personally is rich
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:25 AM
1

Yes, you absolutely did edit the comment because the SWERFy comment wasn't there before
/r/MensRights25/04/23 10:24 AM
2

Your source has nothing to do with research. It only shows people that agree with it, as if those institutions are infallible. Q
/r/MensRights25/04/23 08:10 AM
1

Yeah, exactly, so there is no reason not to legalize it, like every other profession. Unless you are telling me it is not real work and therefore is afforded special privileges. And, looking at other sources, they say sex workers would have the option to pay income tax. That's not how real jobs work. There is no option to pay income taxes, they are mandatory.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 07:54 AM
1

Really? Sex workers pay income tax under a decriminalized system? Edit: Nice edit there. Trying to put shit in after I already responded. You're arguing in bad faith, which means I now know that you don't actually give a shit about this.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:46 AM
1

What are you even talking about? No one is even talking about feminist dogma. If you think that sex work is real work, then the only way it can be called real work is if it's regulated, taxed, and documented like all other real jobs.
/r/MensRights25/04/23 06:21 AM
1

Yes, I've already seen this from other prostitutes trying to promote an agenda where they can have their cake and eat it too. Doesn't actually mean that it's what should be happening. Regulations, taxation, and documentation of the people participating in this is the only legitimate way it should be happening. Anything else is simply prostitutes not wanting to be actually part of the society they are benefiting off of. But you know what? Sure, let's decriminalize everything. No Regulations, no t…
/r/MensRights25/04/23 05:55 AM
-8

No I know exactly what decriminalized means. It doesn't mean it's legal, it means that you don't get put in prison for doing it, up to a certain degree. It being legal means it's treated like any other business, which means it would have to follow laws and regulations. Legalization is what should be happening
/r/MensRights24/04/23 12:29 PM
2

Okay, so the practice isn't regulated but highly encouraged for regular testing. So then, if it's still decriminalized, how is it possible for the law to apply to them in regards to workers' rights? Since it's not recognized by the state as a legal practice, how are workers actually guaranteed their money? Or does the state simply say "you still have your right to be paid for services rendered"? I ask because it seems really odd to me that something can be not legal and still have legal protecti…
/r/MensRights24/04/23 10:15 AM
1

Don't bother. They're always going to claim they have it worse and expect men to shut up and take it like a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:31 AM
-11

If it's decriminalized and not legalized, how do men or women know the person they are participating with doesn't have an STD? Or is that simply a workplace hazard?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 08:54 AM
1

It doesn't matter what you want your analogy to mean. Your analogy is still not good because it does not convey a relevant situation that is like the OPs
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 02:09 AM
2

It's funny that you can use logic and still be wrong about your analogy. It is a bad analogy because it literally cannot be done voluntarily. The situation they gave is entirely voluntary.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 01:07 PM
1

Did you read what context I was using?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 01:03 PM
1

Someone being your kid is social and biological, you twat. It's called adoption look it up, homie.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 01:01 PM
2

No, that's literally the relationship being made. Having water without food or food without water is the same outcome. You will die. That's not a coincidence, that is literally what will happen. And anything that you compare to that is going to be saying the same thing. If it doesn't, it's a bad anaolgy. Good analogies think the relationship through.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 03:28 PM
1

Water and food is not a "rather have both" situation, it's a "necessary to survive" situation. Mine is a rather have both situation, far better than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 02:08 PM
1

No, you don't understand the analogy you made. Water and food are not an either/or situation. You need both to survive. Mine is better because it is two separate volutary situations, just like OPs. You're is not voluntary
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:26 AM
1

That doesn't mean the person isn't their kid. Plenty of people love their adopted family, because it's their family. You saying it's not a real family is ignorant af
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:25 AM
1

The context was clearly about sex. Stop being obtuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:23 AM
3

The context was clearly about sex. It is not that difficult to see that. As for your anecdotal evidence, that has nothing to do with an asexual person being with a sexual person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 03:07 AM
1

Not evidence, boy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 02:31 AM
1

So an adopted child isn't the parents? You're an idiot, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 02:30 AM
1

No, your analogy is bad because its relationship is that you cannot survive without having both. This is not how relationships and sex work. It is a bad analogy My analogy is better than yours because it sets up two situations that are voluntary, while having the same separation as OPs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 02:29 AM
3

Typical. Called out for your bullshit. Can't handle it, and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:38 PM
0

Evidence that is not reliable is not evidence. Use your brain, kid
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:36 PM
1

I don't care because it has nothing to do with the fact that anecdotal evidence is not evidence. Thank you for admitting that you cannot argue against this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:30 PM
4

Reread what I wrote. Because at no point did I say that kissing and cuddling were not physical intimacy. The context, unless you are admitting you a dumb, is quite clear that I was talking about intercourse being necessary in a marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:27 PM
0

Water and food are not a relationship that is naturally good together. It is a relationship that is necessary to survive. Nothing about OPs situation is like that. No, my analogy clearly is closer to OPs situation. In the one case, you have friends thst you can play games with whenever (like having girl friends and causal sex) in the other, I have the potential to play games on my in my own house, but can't. At the very least, it is a better analogy than yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:22 PM
1

No, it isn't. The word evidence being there doesn't negate the first word, anecdotal, which means not necessity true or reliable. It is not actual evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:13 PM
4

I never said that cuddling or kissing were included. It's not some rant. It's me calling you out for arguing in bad faith. The fact that you can't own up to it yet somehow think someone else should own up to shit they didn't do tells me everything I need to know about you as a person
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:11 PM
0

No, I know exactly how analogies work. Yours is a bad one. An analogy is meant to show the relationship between things. You're trying to say one thing (single and sex filled) is like having water and no food. Except you would die without food, you will not die without having a relationship. A better analogy would be, it's like having a gaming computer but only using it for work vs having a friend you can visit and play whatever game you want with.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:08 PM
10

No, you are being obtuse. Where did I say that kissing was included? I didn't. It is clear from the context that I'm talking about sex. Stop playing mind games, you're bad at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:42 PM
9

You're being intentional obtuse, which makes me think that this whole thing is in bad faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:36 PM
-1

No, the analogy is bad. They only make sense if you think having children wife and sex are all necessary. Most people don't think like that
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:35 PM
1

Are you one of those people who doesn't believe a child is yours unless they are a product of your semen?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:32 PM
1

That is a cold take.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:29 PM
9

Yes, there is literally no other reason to call something a romantic relationship if there is no physical intimacy. If you're asking this question because you or someone you know is asexual and they or you are wondering if you can be in a relationship with someone else who is sexual, then the answer is you can't be unless you are willing to do sexual acts for them or willing to let them have sex with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:28 PM
2

Anecdotal evidence is not evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 06:24 PM
3

Oooooh okay I see the difference now. Thank you for clarifying. Tbh, that seems pretty straightforward and less problematic than modern relationships
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:58 AM
6

You mean a prostitute? Because I was under the impression that escorts and prostitutes are different things.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 08:29 AM
5

That's not a race, that's a nationality
/r/MensRights14/03/23 05:54 AM
4

You can have and do both.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 08:33 AM
5

r/menslib is a feminist forum pretending to care about men. They are notoriously bad at shoehorning feminist propaganda into every discussion about men. Edit: this is how bad r/menslib is https://www.reddit.com/r/MensLibWatch/comments/sovbtg/that_time_when_menslibs_rules_went_from/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
/r/MensRights14/02/23 12:35 PM
2

This has nothing to do with toxic masculinity. No one is talking about helping people as being a bad thing.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 12:46 AM
2

I didn't know that sub existed. I will give it a look to widen my perspective
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:02 AM
0

What misogynistic comments? Where are you getting thst info from? The person that's scamming people out of money?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 07:44 PM
4

Yeah, because she is deflecting and trying to get out of doing what people paid her for.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 07:42 PM
4

If you are a paying customer, and they aren't making content, would you not ask why they aren't making content while still taking your money?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 07:40 PM
1

Should be more than that
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:31 PM
-4

I have a circumcised penis and I can assure you that you are over exaggerating for the sake of trying to have the high ground. The person that circumcises is a medical professional, so you either are making up stuff or you are talking about a very specific religious ritual most likely performed by the Orthodoxy Female circumcision is actually worse than male circumcision.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:20 PM
-12

This just sounds like over exaggeration of how bad it is.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 01:05 PM
1

What is the name of the judge that gave full custody to this piece of shit?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 09:59 AM
2

The person who gave that woman full custody should get the death penalty.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 09:57 AM
2

I'm not seeing where it's lacking nuance. I explicitly said that women are only complaining about being treated as a therapist in the context of the men having real issues that can't be solved by having someone to talk to. Both spouses should be able to confede in each other. But it should also be understood that each person has their breaking point. With stresses of life, sometimes a spouse will not be able to make time for the other, especially if kids are involved. They should also not be hel…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:37 AM
1

Again, you literally missed the point of what I said. It has nothing to do with showing weakness to a partner. A spouse does not have the knowledge to work through trauma nor can they give antidepressants. If you are that depressed that you need to have a breakdown a month, you need therapy.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 04:04 PM
0

No, that's not what I mean. Women aren't complaining that their men are showing them vulnerability and needing a shoulder to cry on. They are complaining about their men who clearly need help but aren't doing anything except unloading it to their spouse. A woman can't write a prescription for her spouse, nor are they able to fix their traumas. That requires actual help and a plan of action to get over.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:08 AM
7

Men also seek venting. One of many complaints is that men use their spouse as a therapist. Men do need to unload their emotional baggage, but it has to be what each individual person is comfortable with.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 05:02 PM
2

Judge Bruce needs to get his shit kicked in
/r/MensRights03/02/23 08:24 AM
9

That's a lot of bullshit. Did you leave that shit hole?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 04:04 AM
14

I have heard this. It's a power thing
/r/MensRights03/02/23 03:54 AM
2

In my opinion, a person wanting to cause as much hurt as possible would say what they did. I believe in your good heart, I just don't want someone walking all over it. I hope she does come around as well and that she apologizes profusely.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:59 AM
2

I'm not exactly sure how to phrase this, but i don't accept being young as a good enough reason for her behavior. If she's old enough to know about things like rape culture and be able to discuss your traumas with openly, then she's old enough to know that what she was cruel. People will show you their true colors when push comes to shove, and it looks like she just showed you hers. If you are strong enough to endure and look for the good in her, then I hope she does come around and grows into a…
/r/MensRights29/01/23 04:36 AM
1

And you'd be half right.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 05:49 AM
1

It's not being a good partner to defend the toxicity of your partner. I'm not saying that his heart isn't in the right place. Only that he needs to accept when someone he loves is in the wrong.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 05:43 AM
1

Interestingly enough, I only found this sub because r/MensLib banned me just today for suggesting that Jordan Peterson has helped people. Regardless of what the mods' bias is, to deny and then ban someone for stating something that is factually correct is juvenile and toxic.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter