TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Big_shqipe Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by Big_shqipe on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

This is entirely speculative, but, they don’t give a breakdown by race or social class. Perhaps the gap is explained by non white men making up a bigger percentage of the populace in recent years and suffering less advancement then their female counterparts. It would be really grim if this is true especially if they’re first gen immigrants because the quality of life reduction or stress of migration isn’t something that really talked about in the immigration debate.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 03:10 PM
2

I wasn’t supporting that statement just attacking the initial claim about priests. Then it got off topic
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:33 PM
3

I’ll hold the L on the links no doubt and that one particular claim about half of all child SA cases being women. But we’re off topic the post is about female perpd rape not being taken seriously
/r/MensRights04/05/24 11:14 PM
3

I saw it briefly but I lost it and it was about 4x the number of female perpd rape cases. Although the broader point I was making was that these stats broadly aren’t useful as single data points due to overrepresentation of certain groups such as homosexuals, step parent or mothers boyfriend, etc. that’s kind of i was trying to talk specifically about the posts meaning.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:39 PM
2

Did you read link 2?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:18 PM
5

Ok now let’s put on our thinking caps and let those gears turn. How do you square away a 13x propensity of males to commit SA as a form of child maltreatment and still have them commit less overall SA than women?
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:15 PM
5

link 1%20were%20female) link 2 SoUrCe!! Stfu and do your own reading I’m not a teacher and I also said stats are propaganda anyways.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:07 PM
5

Just over Half of child SA cases are perpetrated by women overall. Citing very specific stats like that are purely propaganda points especially when like half of male perpetrated child SA are from biological fathers. They’re totally distinct issues with different causes and solutions but citing random stats like your doing is literally why this post exists, bc you don’t actually care you just want to cry about men.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 09:04 PM
4

That’s just the church you’re citing of which priests, are an exclusively male group. Moreover that’s a can of worms because the SA is mostly perpetrated by homosexual priests. Also it seems to be an epidemic of young’s boys being abused by female teachers.
/r/MensRights04/05/24 08:54 PM
1

Find a diferent priest I suppose. I have good relations with one priest (as much as I can considering his busy schedule) near me bc he’s of the same ethnic descent as me and because he’s quite traditional although the doesn’t really show it. Other priests I’ve met I didn’t particularly enjoy so I don’t attend their masses. You’re allowed to discuss things with priests in Catholic Church since they’re human but ultimately you can just leave that particular church. If they’re a bad priest overall …
/r/MensRights18/04/24 03:50 AM
2

Everyone in the church gets catechized, that is, they are taught the inviolable dogmas of the church. The whole thing gets summarized in like 30-40 pages for adults like myself. On more complicated theological questions, it’s not hidden info but priests have to disseminate like any other info. They have to consider things like the technical ability of the listener, public perception, practical applications, etc. The concept I stated above isn’t exactly new but most priests have a hard enough tim…
/r/MensRights15/04/24 02:22 AM
8

I think you have a general misunderstanding of how the church view forgiveness of sins. Some priests are wishy washy about it but generally speaking it’s understood that the forgiveness that most people think of is from god, from spiritual punishment. Temporal effects, the stuff right now, doesn’t just get hand waved away and has a bit more complexity behind it.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 07:30 PM
15

The enemy is simultaneously strong yet weak, able upend the current order yet one strong push away from annihilation.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 10:19 PM
6

Lowkey got mixed feelings about this bc they claim they’re father would’ve found it funny and has fringe views on burial customs. Maybe the dad being a nihilist really wouldn’t care what his daughters are doing over his grave. As horrifying as it is to the rest of us it’s not as black and white as it seems.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 09:14 PM
4

The answer is women can’t directly be meaningfully violent anyways even if they’re aggressive enough to desire it. However like any other authoritarian/sycophant/Marxist/postmodernist/whatever she can’t help but engage in double speak and sleights of hand. She says “crimes like this” referring to the murder of infants which anyone could do and then refers to “1% of murders” which generally only men can do, and hopes no one will catch it.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 07:26 PM
1

Yeah that’s actually a fairly good summary on the matter.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 06:04 PM
1

Truthfully they’d be more useful in static positions or rear echelon units. Also you’re assume that there wouldn’t be some element of ostracism for women that didn’t do something. When I say exempt I’m talking specifically the shooting part of civil service.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:44 PM
1

Dawg we already covered general civil service and how it’s equally as important and that in all likelihood only volunteers would serve on frontlines today. However I’m the circumstances of existential threats there is no way around being expected to be a shooter. The only people that would be exempted would be physical liabilities, the old, infirm, children, and yes women. Men that are physically able will be expected to be in frontline units and men that aren’t willing will be punished to some …
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:37 PM
1

It isn’t a free pass so much as it’s a “stay out of the way because you’re a liability,” anyways some countries allowed women to take up arms too although it was less common.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:30 PM
1

Don’t think killing is the right answer but truthfully I can’t see why you’d expect your society to accept you if didn’t serve it when it needed it most.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:27 PM
1

The presence of NATO significantly effected the probability of war. No one knows how the next war will play out. The Finns may change their mind when push comes to shove.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 05:19 PM
1

Totally forgot to mention that most states in Eastern Europe (south to north) fought wars of existence in the early 20th century. It’s fair to say the soviets and nazis weren’t the best examples but the baltics and Central European states weren’t exactly immoral and required everyone to fight more or less.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 04:54 PM
-1

We can debate hypotheticals all day but we have a historical basis for conscription and it’s consequences. Draft dodging Vietnam is a-ok in my book but draft dodging ww2 Allies not so much. The issues arising from conscription as I described them have real life examples of how countries dealt with them or are currently dealing with them. However conscientious objection largely only worked in countries that could essentially get away with not needing to conscript a few people. I doubt the soviets…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 02:08 AM
-4

Ehhh I didn’t say anything about choosing. I’m well past able bodied and fit for service. If I find out someone who is perfectly capable of serving and didn’t during a true existential threat while I did, I’d be pretty upset.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:49 AM
3

I mean if the nation faces an existential threat I ain’t gonna carry it all on my back solo brother. Also yeah I agree that equality before the law is important thats why I mentioned how to equalize general civil service with frontline service. Combat arms struggle already with reintegration and taking people that could’ve potentially thrived elsewhere ought to be rewarded for service.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:30 AM
8

Only men being able to useful in frontline combat and general conscription aren’t the same thing. As you mentioned women can be useful in general civil service freeing up more able bodied men to fight. However I understand the sentiment that it’s not really fair and there ought to be some kind of preferential recognition of that fact. For example frontline conscripts ought to have significantly more resources dedicated to reintegration than support conscripts. It doesn’t help if the civilian sec…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 01:09 AM
8

The spread is about the same for all education levels. So about 10-20% of them are hypocritical but as education goes up the number of people who don’t view infidelity, in general, as bad increases.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 02:46 PM
4

Smiling can be a stress response I wouldn’t go off of just that.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:44 PM
10

I’ve gone through the same thing and admittedly there’s no good answer. Consider a potential partner, wouldn’t you want them to care about their health in the same you do? In a sense you’re imposing physical judgement on them as well, and frankly we all do it. I didn’t like fat girls when I was fat either. I understand it’s a tough to pill to swallow because it feels like people will essentially throw you away if you don’t keep up this image. However you shouldn’t view it as something distinct f…
/r/MensRights22/07/23 03:21 AM
3

This link mentions that the gap closes towards the end of highschool and full maturation is 25 for both genders. If the argument is that physical puberty takes longer I can buy that but that doesn’t really say anything for mental development. This link mentions mental pruning as an explanation but as far as I’m aware mental pruning is stimulated by learning so we’re back to circularity where maturity = grades.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 04:58 AM
3

I don’t buy the female maturation theory either. I’ve never heard the metrics behind how they gauge this except maybe school participation or or grades but then that Makes the explanation circular. Young adults are dumb and immature in different but equal ways and I imagine we’re only focused on stuff that only men can do. For example violent outbursts in classrooms are mainly a male problem because women couldnt be violent if they wanted to frankly.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 04:16 AM
1

An unbelievably naive take. Part of what contributes to western stability is a recognition of natural rights, one of which is the right of self defense (and defense of others). Your line of thinking is the exact thought process that pushes govts to punish the common moral citizen more than the ones doing the evil.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 02:25 PM
18

The obesity/health crisis is probably the biggest reason for this phenomenon. No one (generally) finds fat people attractive so there’s a large subset of people that aren’t even attracted to themselves for lack of better word.
/r/MensRights22/05/23 11:49 AM
1

Fair criticism but the reason I’d bet on it is because mostly everyone at some point whines about dating and how it’s unfair towards them when really they’re just hung up in the fact that people they like don’t like them back. whether or not men or women are generally more reasonable in their preferences is not something I was speaking on. The only patterns that I’m generally aware of that are somewhat backed up by data, not that I keep that on hand, is that men care about weight/age whereas wom…
/r/MensRights13/01/23 03:19 PM
6

Therein lies the problem. Are they shorts of tall women saying they get shamed or guys sitting around saying they don’t want tall girls? I’d bet it’s the former, which means very little then because it’s a classic case of the people I want don’t want me so everyone must hate me.
/r/MensRights13/01/23 02:15 AM
1

It’s kinda like asking why people pour so much effort into something like going to the gym, at some point it becomes part of your character.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 08:09 PM
2

Strictly speaking equality of the sexes is either not feasible or of interest to most men in this sub. Part of that is due to the fact that our opinions are apart of a niche group and society at large mostly disagrees. Truthfully the best you can do is be honest about whatever it is you believe in and try to act it out in the world.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:35 PM
7

The abstract doesn’t exist without physical form. You Can’t exactly sexualize some formless abstraction of a women or femininity
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:20 PM
1

Depends on what your doing. The lack of electrolytes are gonna fuck you if you’re actually active during that time frame
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:34 PM
2

As a general rule if your struggling to debate purely on facts debate the concepts in their abstract form. Often time those discussions can reach an impasse where information is needed to determine truth but normally it Atleast makes the other person consider that you may be correct upon the presentation of information.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 09:23 AM
10

It’s likely the case that they can’t get guys they want to date to ask them out as is the case with men.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 08:28 AM
-1

That’s actually a very fair criticism I don’t think you deserve the downvotes. That being said in conversation I wouldn’t outright assume the other party was rationalizing when they said that. It may be a meta debating technique but it’s perfectly fair to not want to make the argument for the other party even if for some reason their intuition tells them something about your statement is off.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:29 PM
1

Just ask her anything that you want to know and let her talk and whenever she’s finished her response just bounce off it with how you relate to the subject matter or ask another question to develop further.
/r/seduction22/03/20 12:04 AM
1

I meant something a little bit different. For example this girl I go to school whom I a hard crush on (which is rare) seems to always be busy, going somewhere, talking to someone, or otherwise engaged. How the heck am I supposed to sell myself if you’re not in a position to be bothered.
/r/seduction15/03/20 05:29 AM
2

I find the subject matter (dating) truly fascinating to observe anthropologically speaking and I’m trying to see a pattern with respect to gender relations. I don’t really need “tips” so to speak I generally do ok just being myself the hardest part is actually approaching them and trying to be friendly because I seem to have a bad habit of being attracted to women that for one reason or another aren’t available to me and there’s no good tip to fix that.
/r/seduction15/03/20 05:15 AM
2

Well I glad to hear you’ve experienced love it’s a refreshing to see in a sub that usually depresses me a little when I surf through it.
/r/seduction15/03/20 05:04 AM
5

Thank you I don’t mean to say that your advice was bad since everyone should be themselves for the most part but that it’s not always going to be the case that the woman is going to be any good at talking.
/r/seduction15/03/20 04:56 AM
4

I suppose “hot” is somewhat subjective but perhaps they’re just used to the guy carrying the conversation.
/r/seduction15/03/20 04:43 AM
48

Not to be a dick but the it’s not all about you. I’ve straight up monologued to a girls for 5-10 minutes straight, had them reply to everything is said with a simple ok and still made out/had sex with them after and some weren’t introverts. I was merely saying that it’s not always going to be the case where women do the talking, sometimes you’re gonna have to try your goddamn hardest to keep the conversation going.
/r/seduction15/03/20 04:41 AM
52

Not always good advice some women really suck at conversating
/r/seduction15/03/20 04:26 AM
1

Sometimes I do a give and take type conversation so I’ll to direct conversation towards something I’m well versed in or knowledgeable about. Then I’ll give some cursory information about the subject and then cut it off by saying something like “I’d explain more but we don’t have the time Maybe some other time.” Truth be told I do this to people in general whether or not I’m attracted to them or not because while I want to flex one of my greatest strengths, intelligence, I also don’t want to bore…
/r/seduction20/02/20 03:11 PM
1

How many thousands? How many men live in the World Billions? Scale it down to a single country and we’re talking millions which is still .1% of the population
/r/seduction18/02/20 03:02 PM
1

Well if you go looking for those stories you’ll find them but they are fairly rare. I’ve been hit on 3-4 times by girls in my life and 2-3 of them were awkward and one was just straight up annoying. Only one ever actually led to something and I still had to put in half the effort to make it work. So trust me when I say you’re envisioning a fantasy that is exceedingly rare in real life
/r/seduction18/02/20 02:54 PM
1

You could if I comes organically in conversation although I wouldn’t lie about if I does come up b/c if she does care and I condescending about it you don’t want to be with her and if she’s ok with it then I won’t matter. Besides, in my experience, few women ask about sexual history early on if at all. If you want to “prepare” for sec you could just read literature about how to pleasure a women like where the g-spot is, how to finger her, deliver oral, etc. Also just keep in mind sex is like ~60…
/r/seduction08/02/20 05:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter