TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BiggoBeardo Archive

View 0 posts and 45 comments by BiggoBeardo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It’s pretty common sense. Guys literally pay exorbitant money to watch naked women do things. Most of these sites register transactions as fraudulent if the credit card has a female name because it’s usually a wife or mother’s credit card. Girls read smut and romance novels instead, which almost no guy touches. Gay men and lesbian women follow similar patterns to their sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 12:56 AM
1

Definitely not just as. Not even close. There was a documentary where some woman pretended to be a man just to see what it was like (she was lesbian too), and she confirmed that there are very big differences in attraction patterns.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:33 AM
1

Dude just give it up. Might as well argue that grass is purple
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:30 AM
1

Most people don’t use knives and firearms in fights (especially lower stake ones) since that would likely cost the life of one or both of the people in those fights.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:27 AM
1

Our current socialization of men is to suppress their naturally violent instincts more than anything. Look at the way our schools are set up: sit down for 8 hours, listen to teachers, don’t play rough, etc. I would say if we got rid of the socialization element, boys and men would be significantly more violent.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:26 AM
1

Most women in Miami are like this
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:22 AM
2

Lmfao very true
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 07:45 AM
1

No I know you can’t pay the bet which is why I didn’t offer it. But you got this wrong: I’m very confident Arman beats Ilia. He’s better in every aspect of the game ex or the boxing (where he is still very high level). He can 100% take Ilia down and maul him from there. He won’t waste time giving Ilia openings by throwing hands with him in the pocket. Of course, since you don’t sound like your age has hit the double digits I doubt you have any kind of coherent argument otherwise. But if you do, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 06:07 PM
1

I would ask you to put 500 on it but then I remembered that third graders usually get yelled at by their parents when they demand that much money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 04:34 PM
–

The male equivalent of the peacock is having high status, wealth, power, etc. Women just need to demonstrate fertility (through beauty). There will always be more cute women than high status men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:57 PM
1

Do you realize regardless if your partner makes the same income as you or none at all, you have to still pay alimony? This is an irrelevant issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:43 PM
1

Sure, sometimes they do. What’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:31 PM
1

No I’m just not taking a retard like your seriously. Besides, don’t you have multiplication homework to finish?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 10:30 PM
1

Prenups that protect future income are legal and have been done for a while. Although to get back to the original point, most men complain when their pre marital items are given away not necessarily basic alimony.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:58 AM
1

People routinely accept prenups like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 10:01 PM
1

Yes I do 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:52 PM
-1

It’s extremely true. Just a fact of biology that women don’t experience the visceral, visual attraction that men do but look at them more through a holistic lens (status, social dynamics, archetype, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 09:05 AM
1

You’re simply wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 08:53 AM
1

Yeah, that’s why men get prenups these days. If I’m no longer with somebody, why do I still have to function as their personal ATM? And by the way this would be a problem regardless if the woman is making 250k per year on her own or 0, so it‘s pretty irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 12:31 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 11:37 PM
1

You can do that, or you can simply not do that. Both are completely fine and can result in a net benefit. I’m telling it to you straight: most men would be fine either way. They’re happy to have a loving, feminine, caring partner who makes zero money so long as they themselves have the necessary income to support a household. You’re trying hard to prove that this is a stupid decision but it really isn’t. If anything, it’s more “romantic” and less using your partner for some kind of utilitarian b…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 09:14 PM
1

Sure, agree to disagree. For the record, I do pay for dates if I like a girl but do expect non-parasitic, feminine behavior in return. Will always go Dutch if I don’t like a girl though or it’s clear she doesn’t like me. Never gonna allow people to get a free dinner for absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 05:13 AM
1

I mean you said something different earlier, but even then, if it’s a question of them being able to be self-sufficient, then why does this matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:59 AM
1

If you have the money to take care of yourself and then you move in with this person and can take care of all financial related things, why would that be an issue? A top lawyer (aforementioned example) would make more than enough on their own to support a household.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:58 AM
1

Yes, hypergamy is a result of women needing to be more selective due to the fact that the cost of reproduction for them (due to anisogamy) is greater. It’s logical. Reproduction incurs minimal cost = go for as many options as possible Reproduction incurs heavy cost = choose wisely whose child you have to carry for nine months, put your life at risk to give birth to, and devote heavy maternal duties for a certain period of time for And yes silverbacks do have these extreme polygynic dynamics in p…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 04:57 AM
1

However, this does not mean that most men historically never reproduced—it just means that fewer male lineages were passed down due to various factors like war, conquest, and social structures. You literally just proved his point. Who are the people overwhelmingly taking risks, fighting wars, and conquering alien territories? Many women had no choice in partners due to forced marriages, abduction, and sexual violence in warfare. Consent in reproductive choices was often limited or nonexistent. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:45 AM
1

Yeah but we still do have variance in outcomes and psychological instincts, just to a considerably less extreme degree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:41 AM
1

You haven’t answered any of my questions. You’ve just repeatedly your stance which is that you don’t want to date men who don’t pay for all of your dates. I have asked you why you do this despite sharing all your resources with your partner anyway in which case you repeat your stance that you don’t date men who don’t pay for all of your dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:39 AM
1

You’re unable to answer my questions and repeat your position, which you have made clear about 20 times already and I am under no false impression about. It’s simple: you want someone for their resources rather than who they are, and you want men to provide things for you without you providing anything back in kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:33 AM
1

So, again why is that a requirement for you if you plan to share all your resources anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:28 AM
1

You said I will only date someone if they do these things. So, again why is that a requirement for you if you plan to share all your resources anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:21 AM
1

Wait so why does he need to pay for all those things if you’re gonna share everything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:15 AM
1

I already have a kid, nigga
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:14 AM
1

Sure, people can have preferences of that kind, but I’m just telling you straight, most men don’t care at all. You started going “Oh but that’s so stupid1!1!1”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:13 AM
1

No like I mean if you could simply reach your hand out and save them without any issue for you versus sit by idly and wait for other people to invest their resources and do it for you with a much lower likelihood that that person ends up saved and significantly greater overall investment of resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:08 AM
0

When one group produces larger, less mobile ova that entails a larger cost of reproduction to the costs of fertilization, pregnancy, birth, etc. This is not that hard to understand. Men prevented other men from procreating how? Why was there any need for that in the first place? You literally look at nearly every species that is genetically close to us and the pattern of more women than men reproducing remains constant (among gorillas the ratio is something like 25:1). Women tend to go for highe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 12:05 AM
0

Yes, human sperm is physically smaller than eggs making the cost of reproduction for males significantly less impactful than for women. Hence, why women are significantly more selective than men when it comes to sex. Polygyny literally proves the point about hypergamy. Men have sex with multiple women through hypergamy as women, on average, will have sex with men of higher value. With your pseudo-scientific sarcastic leftist lingo that said a whole lot of nothing, you proceeded to prove my point…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:27 AM
1

You just contradicted yourself. You need him to pay for everything but then you’re also splitting the resources? Your logic makes zero sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:24 AM
1

If you’re on a cruise ship and watching someone drown who you could save, do you: a) Save them or b) Cry and complain that the cruise doesn’t have the tools it needs to immediately save them while sitting by idly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:23 AM
1

Why should a man care how much money his woman makes? Is his girlfriend an ATM or a romantic partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 07:21 AM
1

Because men would do that in a heartbeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:49 PM
1

This summarizes most leftist logic. “I’m not gonna be your personal charity but the government should be with everybody else’s taxpayer money.”
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:47 PM
0

Really? Then how is it that we have twice as many female ancestors as male ones? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002251931200313X It’s directly a product of anisogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:44 PM
1

I mean you can be reductive like that but then so can the other side. “All women care about is the resources and status of a man. Once that disappears, attraction is gone.” The reality is attraction is complicated and each side from a raw evolutionary point is thinking in at least somewhat exploitative terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:35 PM
1

So why can’t a man expect that from you then? What if they want you to prove that you can pay for a first date? In that case, Dutch works out pretty well. You’re not saying that you don’t want to date a guy who expects you to pay for both his and your food, but rather a guy who doesn’t always pay for the entire meal. It’s okay to admit it: you don’t just care about if a man can self-sustain (this could be the case regardless of how he decides to pay for food), but if you can use his resources. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter