TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BillRuddickJrPhd Archive

View 0 posts and 143 comments by BillRuddickJrPhd on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Approach women at bars, house parties, concerts, etc. But approaching women at Chipotle or the grocery store is dirtbag behavior. I'm sorry, but it is. It's barely better than catcalling. You're basically saying that women cannot go out in public and do basic tasks without strangers propositioning them. It's insane. Would you want to live in a world where going to Target probably means some gay man tries to chat you up? Are those the social norms you want? Didn't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 04:37 PM
–

Aren't men more than ever "enjoying" being single and alone? Isn't porn making this insanely easier?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 07:01 PM
–

Back in the 90s and before, the majority of young women weren't very attractive and they knew it. Nose jobs were very rare. Braces were expensive. Lasik didn't exist. Skin care was not nearly as advanced. Straightening hair or exercising was considered try-hard behavior, and doing intense recreational sports as a hobby was considered lesbian-coded. The hippie culture persisted and some girls didn't even practice basic hygiene or shave. I think a perfect example is Adrian (Talia Shire) in Rocky. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 06:52 PM
1

I'm okay with people saying large age gaps are gross, uncouth, tacky, etc. But two things annoy me: 1. People calling it predatory or exploitative behavior. Sure there's an argument for this when the woman is under 21, possibly even under 25. But at some point she is in fact a fully grown adult with full autonomy and agency. People who think the larger the gap, the more predatory. No, that is absolutely not how it works. A 26-year-old dating an 18-year-old is WAY WORSE than 50-year-old dating a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 04:48 AM
2

I just want to know how much of the appeal is "handsome guy with infinite money" versus guy who says "I don't make love, I fuck hard". Like 50/50? 20/80?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 01:18 AM
2

I think 50 Shades of Grey would be far more interesting and instructional if the character wasn't a billionaire. Just like a normal dude who has a sex dungeon. I'd love to know what the reaction to that would have been.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 11:41 PM
10

Uhhh no, there are men who call themselves alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:35 AM
–

Fully agree. There's also a weird thing I've seen TikTokers do where they identify themselves as a "hot girl" like it's some kind of racial or sexual identity or some shit. It's hilarious. I remember my late father back in 2008 saying "Why is John McCain calling himself a maverick? You let other people call you that, you don't call yourself that."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:33 AM
2

Natural selection works in many ways. If you're a woman who is effectively sharing the same guy with many other women, you're not exactly self-selecting either.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 12:56 PM
–

The two primary things are inability to detect and properly interpret social cues, both verbal and non-verbal, and inability to feign interest in what other people are talking about. That said, as someone who has a brother who is actually autistic--as in he twiddles his fingers while humming half the day, and he punches himself when he gets frustrated--most of these people on social media claiming autism as their entire identity are annoying and mostly full of shit. Being borderline Aspergers is…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:02 AM
–

So many things wrong with this post I just don't have the time. Being a simp in a LTR is not good or healthy for either partner, I'll give you that. Everything else you said is pretty wrong though.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 04:23 AM
–

If your idea of an attractive man is a top 2% man, and you yourself are an average woman, then any "attractive man" from your perspective who shows interest in you is going to ghost you after he adds you to his BC. And that's a best case scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 03:40 AM
–

If something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 01:20 AM
4

If you think 90% of men are a 5 or below, you don't understand how numbers work. Attraction is a product of cultural values and environmental factors, as well as supply and demand. If you establish and maintain unreasonable standards you are more likely than not to lose out in life, and this is true for everyone man or woman. Any man you personally have ever been with in your entire life, past or future, has "settled" for you. You were not anyone's first choice. You understand that, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 11:21 PM
-2

so women should not date men they find attractive looks wise They should if they themselves are comparably matched. But chances are you're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 10:45 PM
12

This is beyond delusional. Countless hot millionaire men will bend over backwards to be with her. Look at the Kardashians.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:49 AM
–

Meg will never find another Klay Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 02:36 AM
-1

Nah I think your seething hatred is you telling on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:24 AM
10

If you think a woman over 26 who stays in shape doesn't look just as good as she did at 22, you have concerning issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:02 AM
3

I find it amusing when people think being attracted to someone because of their appearance is somehow less shallow than being attracted to their wealth and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:00 AM
-5

You all are really weird about this. Like you're genuinely angered by people engaged freely in a transactional arrangement, and the noble savage racism you use to justify your pearl clutching. Yes, older unattractive men have limited options. Wow, you figured it out! You cracked the code! You really showed them how superior you are for not being divorced (likely due to your wife's lack of options)!
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 01:58 AM
2

No, but if the woman believes she will die if you don't help, and you exploit the situation to coerce unwanted sex out of it, that makes you a rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:00 PM
1

Like I said, it depends on the circumstances, which the OP left vague on purpose. If he has a stockpile of food and water and she's going to die without it unless he sleeps with him, it's fucking rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 12:03 PM
6

Harvey Weinstein used the same logic as you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:58 AM
15

If one end of the transaction involves someone's life or even their livelihood, it's coercion and therefore it's effectively rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:11 AM
8

Do you not understand what coercion means?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:07 AM
4

The story is stupidly unclear. If she gives in because she's too lazy to do things, no it's not rape. If she starts sleeping with him because her survival depends on it (like she won't be able to find food without his help and he knows it), then it's absolutely rape. He's using the threat of her own survival to coerce her.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 09:04 AM
1

Pictures of my feet won't even buy me a slider at White Castle. And yeah I'd still rather do crime. If society is so broken that I have to prostitute myself to literally survive, while others do not, I'll be fucking with those others.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 11:27 PM
6

You mean a man versus a woman I find repulsive. I think most straight men would still choose the woman. But reverse the situation, most straight women would absolutely choose the woman over the repulsive man. You understand this, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:00 AM
3

Ok. I wouldn't. If I was literally facing starvation I would resort to crime and violence before sex work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:01 AM
9

Not wanting to have sex with someone is not wanting to have sex with someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:59 AM
8

My point was to get you to conceptualize the fact that most women would not be okay becoming sex workers or even gold diggers for the same reasons you wouldn't want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 12:48 AM
13

What's stopping you from doing gay sex work?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 11:54 PM
3

I think OP might have a point. Hot girls are more likely lose their "kid in a candy store" phase early.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 12:42 AM
2

Lol WTF is wrong with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 12:57 PM
2

So why then are they offended if the women they are dating will not sleep with them fast (will not hook up with them), or tells them that she wouldn't of hooked up with them? I'm confused by this sentence. In this scenario a woman who a man is dating won't hook up with him and he's not supposed to be unhappy about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 12:18 PM
2

So… no judgement but a body count that high paired with inability to orgasm is classic Compulsive Sexual Behaviour Disorder.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:23 AM
3

One woman I was in a very LTR relationship loved clit stimulation a lot but made a point a number of times very adamantly that fingering did nothing for her. One time I was going down on her while fingering her, she felt the need to remind me the fingering was pointless, and I got slightly angry and snapped at her like “Because I fucking feel like it” or something along those lines and she came immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 04:22 AM
7

Can I ask why you dislike it? I've only been in one LTR with a woman who didn't like it. Like it was like a weak and gross thing for a real man to do, something along those lines. She was pretty fucked up TBH and I think was abused by her stepdad.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:18 AM
–

It sounds like it's also a male problem if you're in the 90-95%.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 10:39 AM
1

It doesn't have to mean anything. It doesn't mean he's going to cheat. It doesn't mean you can't still have a happy healthy sex life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:28 PM
1

Just a disclaimer, I have never led any of those women on. After our date, I always tell them I didn't feel the spark, better off as friends, etc. I don't condone pumping and dumping. And this works? They don't get mad?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:20 PM
5

I think you horribly misunderstood your own blog post. Having a boyfriend or husband isn't embarrassing. Saying "my boyfriend this and my boyfriend that" and making him your identity is what's embarrassing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 09:18 PM
–

I'm in my 40s. I've tried it twice and both were highly negative experiences. The first time I was 21, partying on a trip in Mexico. I actually had a girlfriend at home and was getting laid regularly, but she cheated on me and I wanted payback. One of my friends picked one up and I picked up the one next to her. Very attractive from what I remember. But I was pretty drunk and couldn't get it up. But it mostly wasn't the alcohol. I assure you 21-year-old me didn't have the slightest hint of sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:49 AM
–

If I think of a female incel, I just don't picture anger and resentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 08:52 PM
–

You're right about society in general, but wrong about women and attractiveness. Do you think "learning how to train AI models" would rank high? I doubt it. And when they say reading is an attractive hobby, I assure you they're not talking about finance bros reading self-help books.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:16 PM
–

I'm from a different era. My HS sweetheart actually broke up with me because I bought a PS1. Not immediately after I bought it, but the mere purchase triggered an "oh shit this guy isn't going to grow up and support me" panic that she previously had never talked about before.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:11 PM
–

That includes Candy Crush though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:44 PM
–

There were two studies asking women to rank how attractive they found men's hobbies. In one study, video games were the least attractive. In the other, manosphere was the least attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:43 PM
3

Why would any man complain about this? Do you like subjecting yourself to this humiliation ritual and knowing that you're probably not even the most attractive and confident man to have approached her that week? Do you seriously think this ridiculous cultural practice that pretty much never existed throughout all of human history other than 1945-2010 was egalitarian and leveled the playing field? What if you do have an attractive girlfriend (or daughter)? Do you enjoy knowing she can't even go t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 12:51 AM
6

Are these women you actually knew for more than a day or two? Ghosting is something people do to someone who is actually in their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/25 08:13 PM
1

So the democratization of porn was a myth. Just like the democratization of music, cable TV shows, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 07:53 AM
0

Sorry to jump in but I'm genuinely curious. Can any moderately attractive woman do solo-only stuff on OF, stay anonymous, and make significant money? Are there really that many simps out there?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 01:05 AM
3

This is literally how I ended up divorced. During a few random moments she gave me a calm "I really wish you would do X" like maybe 3 times over the course of 5 years. Yes I would get defensive but then say I'll work on it. Which I didn't. But she truly did not seem to care and was happy and there was no indication whatever this was weighing on her constantly as we got along just like we had the previous 5 years. I was totally oblivious. Then out of nowhere she threw me out. Even though I did de…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:38 AM
1

What an absolute crock of shit. Complaining about something haphazardly once in a blue moon when you're in a bad mood and then not mentioning it again while acting like everything is awesome all the time sends a very clear message that it wans't very important at all and not something you think about much at all if ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:24 AM
–

I think confident extroverts are far more likely to be drawn to those types of jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 03:22 AM
1

You really need to look up the definition of neoliberalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 08:09 AM
1

I find it hard to believe any normal woman actually has a problem with this, especially if you're well paid. But if you still feel like it's a problem, there are all kinds of things you can do to make yourself appear more prestigious. Join a non-profit, become a member of a union or association, or say you're writing a book on the impact of China's rail system on the environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 02:28 AM
2

How would I know?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/25 08:01 PM
1

Then he'll just crave her more than anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 10:36 AM
2

Lazy is when you don't fly to Romania to find the circus-freak in your magazine and proposition her successfully?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:38 AM
10

This is one of the most cartoonish non-understanding of men I've seen in a long time. Men crave novelty. That's it. It doesn't matter if they're incels or married to Jessica Alba, porn offers them something they naturally crave, which can be any woman they don't have access to. A man married to a supermodel who has an identical twin will still jerk off to thoughts of having an affair with the twin. Guys who are swimming in an endless sea of hot women will often develop weird fetishes. My college…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 05:14 AM
16

Most of everyone is mediocre at everything because that's literally what that word means.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:03 PM
1

As a woman coming out of a 13 year relationship ... making you the least qualified person to make this argument. I mean, are you the actual Cathy from the comic strip?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 06:01 PM
2

the answers almost always become lists of things he does for her and support Because that's the socially acceptable answer. That doesn't mean she's not in love with him because he fucked her 3 times a day during the first 3 months they were together and she thought she was on cloud 9.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:06 AM
9

The term "pair bonding" causes a lot of whinging around here. Let's just say yes, excessive porn use desensitizes men, messes up their expectations, and ultimately makes it harder to feel deep romantic connections with sexual partners. I'm pretty sure this has been studied a lot. There are wackos who want to ban porn and think masturbation is the devil, and we don't want to give these people ammo.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:47 AM
1

Why would you want to date someone you didn't want to hook up with? That's psychotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:17 AM
1

Romantic relationships are supposed to be based primarily on sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:16 AM
0

Are you on the spectrum?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:15 AM
8

I don't understand. Why would any woman (or anyone for that matter) go on a date with someone they didn't consider fuckable? This makes no sense to me at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/25 11:11 AM
2

Before the internet, It used to be people would only date for the following social norms. Marriage (Religion played a part in that) Financial Gain (Society loved rewarding couples with money) Children (Back when that was affordable) Family Appeasement (Get the folks off our back about it and get them grandchildren) Love (Yes people would just do it for love) Plenty of people dated just for sex long before the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:20 AM
–

Desperate is not the most accurate term. Desperate implies they need to do something, which isn't necessarily true. It's just that becoming more outgoing, gregarious, funny, and willing to be the initiator is a common response mechanism for less physically attractive people. I think overweight women are simply more inclined to give any guy attention than a woman who is usually fending it off. It doesn't necessarily say anything about you, although you seeming more available could have something …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 04:13 AM
8

Everyone wears a social mask in public, but it's supposed to come off at home for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 04:28 AM
24

I mean, I'm a man and I sure as hell don't want that. It sounds like a dystopian nightmare. I like my partner being a normal human being I can talk to and relate to, not some weird Disney princess who sings songs to animals while I'm gone and acts like a geisha when I'm home. Honest question for any man who disagrees. How can you possibly trust or respect a woman who behaves like that? Where every interaction with you is a performance? Where you have no clue how your wife truly thinks or feels a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 02:53 AM
1

A quick google search says 40%.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 02:04 AM
5

There are things you can control (going to the gym) and things you can't (making people like you). People who focus on the things they can control tend to have better outcomes, and this is true for everyone including normies. The goal of self-improvement isn't to take it up like a religious calling. It's to instill good habits. I think there's some truth to what you're saying. I suggest everyone watch the movie 'Magazine Dreams' it captures this perfectly. But you also seem to have a blind spot.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 10:46 PM
0

I don't know or care. I just saw you make a fallacious argument that because older people are more lonely, younger people being more lonely than ever before can't be true.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 07:01 AM
14

Honestly you sound a little spoiled right now. You think because you have it so great why do you need friends. But what happens when your brothers move far away and your dad passes? And then what happens if your wife changes jobs, her friends get divorced, or God forbid you two split up? Now all these people you simulated friendships with you'll never see again. As if they never existed. And what are you going to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:54 PM
2

Imagine there was a reported "epidemic of young people losing their teeth" and your response was "older people lose teeth more than younger people so there can't be an epidemic".
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:46 PM
10

I fell into this trap when I got married. I didn't feel lonely either at first. It's a mistake. I think for a lot of men their pre-marriage friendships were based on activities that you can't do anymore when you're not single. That could be going out drinking with buddies and trying to get laid, or smoking weed and playing video games. Basically living like college kids. They never developed the skills and habits to maintain friendships as healthy adults, like planning trips or dinner parties wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 11:42 PM
16

Not getting any is a very common origin story for comedians.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 12:39 AM
2

Many believe men simply smiling is weak and creepy looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/25 12:38 AM
–

I honestly think humans evolved in a way where the male population was meant to be culled from time to time via war.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 08:42 PM
-1

Gay men do say things like that. And no mentally healthy people clutch pearls over it like you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:01 AM
1

I honestly don't know what any straight woman or gay man sees in any man. Men are disgusting creatures.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:58 AM
1

The problem with the Belichick situation is she's a complete publicity whore who publicly berates him. She's not just doing it for his money, she's doing it for IG followers and making a fool out of him in the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:57 AM
5

As long as she's not being exploited, like as in "I need to get this old man to marry me or I'll be back dodging drones in Ukraine" then I just don't see the issue. People who say these types of age gaps are inherently exploitative in and of themselves are f****** morons. A 60-year-old man does not any have more power over a 25-year-old than a 30-year-old man does. Less in fact, all things being equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 04:49 AM
2

Then the removal of your vandalism might take a few days longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:28 PM
1

Idk where you think I said that lmfao. That's the position you decided to argue in favor of. Maybe pay attention to the thread you injected yourself into. Freud was wrong more often than he was right. So was Isaac Newton. Doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:27 PM
1

I could go in and edit the page right now and say that pair bonding is dumb and those who believe it as morons. No you couldn't. As a first-time contributor you'd be flagged and your edit would quickly be removed as vandalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:22 PM
-1

So mothers don't love their children? Is that what you're going with?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:19 PM
0

https://www.quora.com/Do-modern-psychoanalysts-still-use-Freuds-theories-in-their-therapy
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 08:18 PM
1

What are all those numbers in the paragraphs?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:39 PM
1

What fake pseudoscience did I tell you to look at?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:25 PM
2

Of course it's a reliable source. You think it's 2008?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 07:24 PM
1

What fake pseudoscience did I tell you to look at?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:48 PM
1

So you admit pair-bonding is real and you made a mistake?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:40 PM
3

Does that mean you believe in the concept that oxytocin instructs you to or enables you to have a mate for life. Nobody here said anything like that, let alone me. You said something utterly idiotic and false so I called you out on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:38 PM
1

I haven't defended any interpretation of anything. I've simply ridiculed you for claiming it isn't a real, well established and well understood concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:35 PM
2

That's literally the father of psychology. Do you have any idea what a self-own this is? Yes, sexual partners quite often form bonds that have similarities and overlap with other types of love, including parent and child. The fact that you've never felt this is concerning.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:33 PM
1

I'm not red pill. You're not well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:30 PM
-8

You think you proved yourself right by showing that the same concept applies to mother and child? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:28 PM
0

Wait you think I'm reading any of that, let alone all of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:26 PM
2

Nice, shifting the goal posts from "anyone who believes in this actual well established scientific concept hasn't dated or had sex in a long time" to "well it wasn't meant to be used for moralizing". Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:26 PM
0

But it's not. It's very well established biology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_bond And if humans didn't do it then men wouldn't know or care who their own children are, let alone help raise them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:20 PM
-1

The fact that your introduction to the concept came from some scammer doesn't make the term itself pseudo-science.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:18 PM
0

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:15 PM
-1

It's not just "people like each other". That completely misses the key component. It's that people fall deeply attached and in love with each other, fueled by oxytocin. In mammals that don't pair bond the males don't care about or even recognize their own children, let alone help raise them. It's not watered down bullshit. It's physical science. You can literally google pair bonding and see what it is yourself. You don't have to act like some flat earth anti-vax weirdo.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:11 PM
5

It's exactly what it implies. You're suggesting that the existence of pair bonding implies literal magic. It's not magic, it's called oxytocin.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:09 PM
-6

Do you always resort to this cowardly bullshit when proven wrong about something?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:06 PM
2

Someone said "pair bonding isn't a thing" so I just showed that it is in fact a well established thing and my only commentary was "sure buddy". And then you typed all this to a fictitious debate partner. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:04 PM
1

You don't know what you're talking about. If pair bonding didn't exist, men wouldn't help raise children. They wouldn't even differentiate their children from other random kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:01 PM
2

Lolwut?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:59 PM
1

Meaning they are born that way. It's well established that women who were sexually abused by their fathers end up having higher numbers of sexual partners and engage in higher sexual risk taking.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:58 PM
1

Marriage is a social construct. People often get married or stay married for reasons having nothing to do with pair bonding.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:47 PM
1

The term doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:46 PM
-2

Sure buddy. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10295201/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:40 PM
7

Are you saying ducks are magical telepathic creatures?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 05:38 PM
1

I mean this really depends on what kind of people the parents are. I think most normal healthy members of western civilization can handle their adult children having sex in their own room as long as the door is closed and they're not screaming and banging the headboard against the wall. Having kids in the house is usually a much bigger issue than having parents there.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:35 AM
1

I did no such thing and if this is how you see things I think your brain is a bit cooked.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 06:30 AM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 11:26 PM
2

OP was implying all other things being equal. So that yes, they were in the same league.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 11:11 PM
2

That's not how it works. The entire space is legally considered their dwelling. The parents would have to file for eviction if the child refused. Most kids wouldn't take it to that extreme, but if they choose to get the law involved then it's their private residence until the eviction date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 11:09 PM
15

She has a kid which means she has much greater financial strain as it is, and having a live-in babysitter (grandma) is a massive asset. If she had her own place grandma would probably be over there everyday anyway so it's just a waste of money. So I wouldn't put both situations on equal footing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/25 11:00 PM
1

You used to be able to put an alert on your iPhone Calendar and it would actually alert you like an alarm. Now it’s just a pop up notification.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 07:43 PM
–

You started off kind of onto something but it derailed pretty quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 08:09 AM
3

I have quite a lot of friends and relatives who served. All of them were enlisted. I'm thinking of about a dozen dudes, and all but 3 were very open about their contempt for everyone else when they came back to civilian life, and all but one stayed that way to this day (I'm in my 40s BTW). Thinking about it now, four of them were discharged. Marine reserves, missed a bunch of weekends in a row due to binge-drinking and was booted. He still calls himself a former Marine and is a massive Trump sup…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:23 AM
8

A lot of people join the military just so they can feel superior and look down on others.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 02:20 AM
1

Have you read Brave New World?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:18 PM
2

I think OP is a clown, but you keep saying this as if he doesn't know this already. That's his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:16 PM
1

Emperor Tiberius literally lived on an orgy island during the last 11 years of his reign and never left it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:14 PM
1

This is like someone who can't even swim wondering why the locals won't let him surf their beach.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 02:08 PM
1

I feel like this kind of thinking is extremely unproductive. What possible good comes from this? What do you want to see happen exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 01:37 PM
–

Honestly I don't think I've ever seen anyone online (and certainly not IRL) claim that they are entitled to sex because they work and contribute to society. Even incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 01:29 AM
1

though its highest with two partners weirdly enough): Why is that weird, that's obviously expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:50 PM
0

I'm sorry but this is so hilariously ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 08:49 PM
2

Look: men don't have the same problem. If a man says no, no amount of pushing will help. I've been in a situation that would be considered rape by most people if the genders were reversed. I ran into my drunk af ex at a party once. I was sitting and talking with her, trying to get some thoughts and feelings off my chest while she was trying to get me to fuck her the entire time. I said no at least 5 times. Not only was I bitter at her, she wasn't particularly attractive in her state. I legitimat…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:54 PM
5

If every dude had your principles women would never pull this shit. They couldn't. Otherwise they'd never get laid either. I find it a little annoying how people assume our very particular, post-modern Western dating culture is some static, unchangeable law of the jungle. It's not. Both simps and rakes just ruin it for everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:45 PM
2

I feel like a fake, disingenuous sounding apology is an underrated tool. "Oh I am so sorry for that" and she doesn't know if you're being sarcastic or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:36 PM
1

Okay but this literally is feminism. I'm not complaining, just pointing out what you described is in fact the feminism that the incels get mad about.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 07:12 PM
2

I kind of like the idea of my ex-wife's current husband feeling this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 12:46 PM
1

you’re saying the only way you will get a man to stay with you is by picking one who nobody else wants. "Lack of options" doesn't necessarily mean "Nobody else wants". Just because he feels you're the best option for him at the time and fortunate to be with you doesn't mean there aren't many other women who'd happily take your place. I promise you there are guys as good-looking as anyone you've been with, with stable jobs who, for one of many possible reasons, just aren't actively looking to dat…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 12:04 AM
4

Many men can tell what type of guy other men are quite easily. I'm not joking, when I was 12, barring maybe a couple exceptions, I could have told you which classmates would have girlfriends in high school, which ones wouldn't, and which ones would play the field. So I can understand why some find it frustrating that woman can't tell. An arbitrary amount of dates? Expensive dates? A verbal commitment? Like specifically, if you were a woman, how would you solve this problem? Those things might ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 11:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter