Biltong_Salad Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-1	r/Intactivism: Having intact genitals is normal If you don't want me to point out your friends are anti-vaxxers then they just shouldn't make anti-vaccination arguments. Full stop. They do use circumcision to shoehorn anti-vaxxer propaganda, they don't even hide it. This shouldn't even be a discussion. Parents have an obligation to provide routine medical care to their infants, they can't wait for the child to get polio then claim they never had 'consent' to a vaccination. This is a completely moronic argument the anti-circumcision guys make.…	/r/MensRights	22/05/20 06:42 PM
0	r/Intactivism: Having intact genitals is normal What should I tell you. I can't prove or disprove your mod reports. But you have tolerated to now frequent comments that sexualized children which is against sitewide rules. I don't know what your game is here, but this will eventually get this subreddit shut down.	/r/MensRights	22/05/20 05:56 PM
0	r/Intactivism: Having intact genitals is normal It doesn't stay up because I report it. But the circumcision trolls make frequent repulsive references to sucking off infants. The anti-vaxxer stuff stays up. This isn't stuff any normal person wants to associate with.	/r/MensRights	22/05/20 05:17 PM
1	r/Intactivism: Having intact genitals is normal These guys don't speak for the group. And when they make sexual comments about infants, or try to shoehorn in anti-vaxxer comments , or make vaguely bigoted comments its incumbent for the rest of us to shout them down. I get that some people are against circumcision and thats fine, but the threats these same guys make to molest children, or not vaccinate, those should not be tolerated a bit.	/r/MensRights	22/05/20 04:59 PM
1	r/Intactivism: Having intact genitals is normal That is completely absurd, and its necessary to note that Mens Rights Activists do not agree with this sentiment. Nobody wants their name associated with this topic and this view does not represent any legitimate group.	/r/MensRights	22/05/20 02:58 PM
0	TL;DR Oxford doesn't understand genital mutilation The relentless dishonesty of these guys is probably why everyone hates them. Its not a great video. Its trash. Its dishonest trash. The speaker complains about MGM but changes the subject to circumcision instead of defining the term or giving an example. Its cheap shitty sleight of hand and nobody is tricked by it.	/r/MensRights	21/05/20 08:38 PM
-4	Circumcision problems I don't think it has anything to do with his dick at all. If a guy complains about how inferior he is, he's right.	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 07:35 PM
-9	Circumcision problems Its not wrong.	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 08:15 AM
-9	Circumcision problems What's the motivation of a guy to complain about how terrible his dick is?	/r/MensRights	19/05/20 07:55 AM
-1	Woman on twitter shares that she enjoys men’s “mutilation”. Its an influence campaign. They're bots performing what's called "coordinated inauthentic behavior" if you read a little you'll see they reuse the same scripts frequently. They're not legitimate accounts.	/r/MensRights	18/05/20 05:16 AM
-4	Circumcision legal commentary In the United States trying to challenge the First Amendment is a dead end. Only someone committed to being a loser would even suggest it.	/r/MensRights	13/05/20 05:59 PM
2	Teachers 'give higher marks to girls' You gotta love the BBC pretending to be a centrist publication even as they editorialize a column with suggestions of behavior. At least the Sun knows its trash. Something as simple as teaching shoulder-writing would narrow the gap in grades.	/r/MensRights	04/05/20 11:14 PM
-2	MGM Its fake outrage being made by a few trolls.	/r/MensRights	03/05/20 04:53 AM
-19	The ADL is threatening to use their power to smear Iceland with 'Nazism', to devastate their tourism industry, for trying to outlaw genital mutilation of male babies If the guys against mgm are so adamant about it, why do they keep attacking the practice of circumcision instead of highlighting actual instances of mgm? Why is there a first ditch resort to dishonesty and rhetorical misdirection? The persistent dishonesty these guys have is a pretty good proof that they don't intend to have good faith dialogue about their goals. Another guy in this thread has his own rhetorical trick. He said "you're free to practice your religion on yourself" and its a weak po…	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 07:14 PM
0	I honestly don’t understand the problem with circumcision you guys have. Its not a legitimate mens rights issue and only a few agent provocateurs bring it up here. They typically use multiple alts to run their scripts so they look like a larger group than they are. Anyone with a modicum of sense realizes this issue can go only as far as routine medical procedures and can't be banned altogether because that would infringe on religious rights.	/r/MensRights	01/05/20 06:55 AM