| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Us men who want a traditional wife to stay home while we work and support the family actually couldn't do that in this economy/ inflation. Which sucks.Demonstrably not true. It is possible. | /r/MensRights | 22/07/23 10:56 PM |
| 1 | Us men who want a traditional wife to stay home while we work and support the family actually couldn't do that in this economy/ inflation. Which sucks.Your inability to conform out of a fear of conformity is itself a kind of conformity. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the "whims of someone else" and do your thing, even if it looks like conformity? | /r/MensRights | 22/07/23 10:54 PM |
| 3 | Good people don’t exist.Everyone is both good and evil. Duh | /r/MensRights | 30/12/22 04:51 AM |
| 0 | Circumcision doesn't get talked about too often on this sub, but it should be one of our primary concerns (WARNING: (sort of) GRAPHIC)Only guys circumcised after sex can compare. No one else. But I wasn't comparing anything, I was disputing the idea that it kills all sexual pleasure, which - I'll say it again despite the stupid downvotes - is definitely wrong. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/21 06:52 PM |
| -5 | Circumcision doesn't get talked about too often on this sub, but it should be one of our primary concerns (WARNING: (sort of) GRAPHIC)| Cutting it off basically kills your pleasure almost entirely. This is definitely not true. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/21 07:25 AM |
| 1 | /r/pregnant mods pushing circumcisionThanks, I see what you're saying. I suppose I disagree that circumcision qualifies for a label as incendiary as "mutilation". That term, to me, implies the practice will impede a child's normal life, but the Jews, as I have mentioned, have proven it no impediment. This is important because we can all readily agree that parent's rights do not extend to, say, cutting off a child's arm. Ear piercing technically qualifies as mutilation, but few object to that. Therefore, we agree that parents have t… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 06:37 PM |
| 1 | /r/pregnant mods pushing circumcisionI already addressed all this, I think. These are baby boys, not men. And again, it is not women as a group that are fostering this practice (which, again, I do not advocate), but those baby boys' own fathers. And virtually all of those fathers do it because they love the child and think it is best. Perhaps it isn't best, but the question is whether "we" should allow it, and that question doesn't belong in this forum because it is not about the rights of men as opposed to women. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 03:21 PM |
| -2 | /r/pregnant mods pushing circumcisionI don't find this convincing. Can you articulate, perhaps in a logical syllogism, why you think it's not a parent's rights issue? So far you seem to be saying it's not because we don't let parents do anything they want, but that doesn't address why we shouldn't let them do this specific thing. Either way, the issue at hand is exactly how much authority parents have over their own children, and not about men vs. women. | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 03:11 PM |
| -4 | /r/pregnant mods pushing circumcisionHonestly I don't understand why this sub is so anti-circumcision. I don't care about the issue at all, though I'm a strident supporter of men's rights. Some parents want their sons circumcised for religious reasons, some for cultural reasons, some don't want it done for health or other reasons. Great! To each his own. Certainly entire cultures, such as the Jews, have thrived while practicing circumcision; no one can deny this. So it's not as though it has had much negative effect on health. It's… | /r/MensRights | 25/07/19 02:08 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter