Bionodroid Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) Intersex refers to the sex of organisms which do not abide by the typical presentation via mutation. This is common enough in humans, accounting for 1-3% of the population, but the number could be higher because intersex conditions are often invisible. This includes hormonal releases different than expected, leading to secondary sex characteristics more consistent with the sex not coded for in the genome, sexual organs different from those coded for, and sometimes a mix of secondary and primary …	/r/MensRights	17/12/24 01:47 AM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) My issue is that dresses are not “historically” feminine. Medieval tunics by all definitions are belted dresses, so are togas and the like. The association with dresses and femininity is specifically related to the early modern period, when breeches became the primary men’s lower garment for all classes. Later during the great renunciation even bright colors, embroidery, etc were considered too feminine for men to wear. Misandry and misogyny are quite related and we have to understand that our o…	/r/MensRights	16/12/24 06:48 PM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) Sex is biological, and also quite variable, but not to the degree of gender. Gender originally referred to grammar in languages, but was applied by feminists to the varying standards to which people are held based on their sex. To use the term gender is to accept that sex and gender are separate since otherwise the word means nothing and you should just say sex.	/r/MensRights	16/12/24 02:04 AM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) This is plainly obvious and an unhelpful statement to make. Abiding by a single aspect associated with womanhood also does not make you a woman or close to one, that’s misandrist.	/r/MensRights	15/12/24 09:14 AM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) What is considered manly or feminine is entirely determined by the intersubjective context of society. The issue isn’t that men aren’t feminine enough, it is that men are punished socially for being feminine, whether by other men or by women. Being gender critical is dependent first and foremost on understanding that what constitutes our associations with gender is made up and intrinsically meaningless.	/r/MensRights	15/12/24 09:11 AM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) Does farming count as a laborious task? In which case, most farming throughout history has been done in dresses or otherwise skirted garments.	/r/MensRights	15/12/24 09:06 AM
1	I never tried dresses (90% of men have not to i guess) This is patently false. Bifurcated garments, at least within Europe, were generally reserved for horseback riding until around the 1600s. Before then, common wear included what we’d call dresses today, but which were called tunics in their time. In and out of western society men have worn a variety of gowns, skirts, dresses, robes, cloaks, etc. for a very long time, at least longer than pants have existed for.	/r/MensRights	15/12/24 09:06 AM
0	"Destroy Boys" This is besides the point, it’s ok to be offended by something then learn the true meaning and to admit you perhaps overreacted without knowing some information, especially if it hits close to home for you.	/r/EverydayMisandry	14/11/22 04:52 PM
0	"Destroy Boys" Destroy Boys doesn’t inherently either. None of the bands messaging is about that. This is just judging a book by its cover.	/r/EverydayMisandry	14/11/22 12:51 PM
1	"Destroy Boys" "Destroy Boys" is quite in line with punk band names. Certainly no worse than many other hard rock band names. Infant Annihiliator? Goatwhore? Dying Infants? Anal Cunt? Destroy Girls would certainly be rejected, but for lack of originality, not due to misogyny. Although the concern is understandable if you aren't a fan of edgier music. BTW, the band itself isn't misandrist at all. However, the lead did get in trouble for abuse, and that was about the only dirt I could find about them.	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/11/22 11:22 PM
1	So Tired Of Hearing About "Systematic Misogyny" I understand where you're coming from, but I disagree with much of your reasoning. People are more concerned about feminism because the historical and current restrictions on women have been graver and more oppressive than those on men, and these systems tend to benefit men (but only a specific subset at the top). We could make people care more about men's issues, but we're not going to get anywhere by disparaging others fighting for women's rights. Perhaps you think you're not doing that, but m…	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/11/22 11:09 PM
1	We create our own problems it definitely is. patriarchy doesn't mean men have it good, quite the opposite, it means that we are expected to do certain things regardless of our traits or desires and that women are often held back by glass ceilings that keep men at the top.	/r/EverydayMisandry	13/11/22 10:46 PM