TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BiscottiOk6095 Archive

View 7 posts and 116 comments by BiscottiOk6095 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Yeah, I know they’re not tough to understand, which is why I’m confused about how you can’t comprehend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:20 AM
–

Lmao, I don’t think this user really reads anything critically; they just assume a scenario so they can argue with you about it...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:17 AM
–

I literally said in my post that all women are not like that. What's the point of creating segments if ppl cant read?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:05 AM
–

I’m not angry or jealous. I understand that I have inherent worth, as should everyone else. Shouldn't I have enough self-respect not to be treated like I’m inferior? Shouldn't I choose a woman who actually likes me over one who doesn’t?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:04 AM
–

Fair enough. I’m not saying women like you don’t exist, I mention that in my post. You’re also a little less than double my age, so I think we’re in different dating circles, which means our values might not overlap.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 04:00 AM
–

Yup good analogy. Lambos are appreciated corollas are taken for granted
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:56 AM
–

Everyone is insecure, everyone needs validation. Chad is not a person but a state
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:50 AM
–

I agree it is, but its not easy especially when you've seen the good and the bad
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:47 AM
–

It reads like that, because thats who you believe I am or you believe that the only kind of man who would post this. I do wish ppd was less anonymous
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:46 AM
–

No, quite the opposite. Women who showed visceral attraction early have literally been the best women I’ve been with. What can I say? They’ve raised the bar for all future women. If women can be 'alpha widowed,' why shouldn’t men? I still remember the first woman who courted me and asked me to come back to her place, fondly. She was so nice and empathetic. All the other women who truly wanted me showed it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:37 AM
–

No there is no favor, I contribute my time she contributes her time. She invests in me, I invest in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:30 AM
–

Again read my post, you're reiterating what i said without you realizing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:25 AM
–

Idk redpill has nothing to do with me
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:23 AM
–

When did I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:22 AM
–

Yeah but how can you ever know "how she treated the lowest time window of a previous partner"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:21 AM
–

Then don't date them Literally my post, please read it again.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:20 AM
–

No, that’s too small scale. I’m talking about an LTR, not something casual. It’d be like a business partner giving other clients a machine for $100,000 but charging me a million for the same machine. Is this the kind of business I’d want strong relationships with? Should I trust them and be okay with it? Should I do favors for them and overlook their small mistakes?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:18 AM
–

Yeah, and how should it make me feel if she blindly trusted men in her past but not me? Is this a good foundation for the future?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:14 AM
–

when did I say I care about her n count in my post?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:11 AM
–

Virgins aren't real.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:10 AM
–

Women have been immediately sexually available to men in their past, most don’t have low body counts and are/have been okay with a lot of other guys who aren’t sure about commitment...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:09 AM
–

I never said it’s not the other person’s decision. My actions are literally dependent on what she chooses to do. I’m not so desperate for an LTR that I’d settle for cheap love.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:06 AM
–

That’s the whole point. If, to her, I’m not a 'Chad,' why would I consider her for a long-term relationship? I’m fine with it being a situationship. I’ll choose the woman who sees me as a 'Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 03:04 AM
–

I don’t understand where you're going with this. What point are you trying to make? I said if she did it with the guy in the past without issue but has a problem with me, it shows who she values more. It’s literally about what she wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:56 AM
–

A better way to match my context would be if I wanted her to do it, but she refused/repulsed by it, even though she did it for her ex and had no issue with it. But in this context, I don't want her to do it. Does that make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:46 AM
–

Because I can’t confirm whether the reason for her not offering sex is good or bad, I look at her actions, and they often suggest it’s not a positive sign. Getting sex isn’t the main point, it’s her willingness to do it. It’s a solid indicator that she likes me nearly as much, if not more, than almost all the other guys in her past. There’s no other way I can know for sure. Why would I choose a woman who sees me and treats me as 'beta Billy' over one who looks at me and treats me like a 'Chad'? …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:42 AM
–

No, totally different context.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:33 AM
–

I’m not saying you’re required to do anything; that’s your choice, your body, and you can sleep with whoever you want. However, I also have the right to decide who I choose for a long-term relationship. If I feel that your actions indicate something problematic, I’m fully within my rights to withhold commitment that wouldn’t be good for me. If you don’t value me, then I’ll move on to someone who does.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:32 AM
–

Yup, its an assumption not a fact
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:26 AM
–

This is literally the opposite of a Red Pill tenet. Most of the replies from the Red Pill men have been disagreements with my post.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:25 AM
–

First month or 2?! Should be max a week. Bro you're a victim, believe in yourself more, you deserve better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:22 AM
–

Exactly my point. The issue is that you can never truly know their history with complete accuracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:20 AM
–

A couple of things I want to clarify about my post: First, I’m not saying a woman has to have sex on the same day or right after the first date. What I mean is 'after'; whether that’s a day later, a week later, etc. but the second meeting should involve her initiating a hookup. Second, I’m not saying she has to do it. Like in your example, if that sexual chemistry isn’t there, I believe a serious commitment shouldn’t even be considered. If she doesn’t value me, I know there’s another woman who w…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:19 AM
–

Why is it wrong for men to be more mindful about who they date? Don’t we have the right to filter for safer choices in ltrs? Just because some women refuse to choose better doesn’t mean men shouldn’t either.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:11 AM
–

Yes I agree, its about choosing and investing in better
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:08 AM
–

he point is, you can't really know for sure, so it's safer to assume the obvious. If she doesn't offer sex on the first date, it likely means you're not as special to her as men from her past and chances are, you're being played for a sucker.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:07 AM
–

That's her decision. Just as she deems me unworthy compared to the guy from her past, I don't think she's worthy of a ltr investment or respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 02:02 AM
–

I'm hedging, I mentioned that it's impossible to truly know. So, just assume the most obvious. Better safe than sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 01:58 AM
–

So, if height filters weren't paywalled, would most women use them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 10:21 PM
2

From my lived experiences, I’ve realized that while many women claim height doesn’t matter, their actions often suggest a strong preference for it. I understand that admitting to physical preferences like height can feel superficial or shallow, and people naturally want to avoid being perceived that way. However, actions speak louder than words. While it’s easy to maintain a facade with words, reality consistently tells a different story. The truth is undeniable—we have a wealth of evidence that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:52 AM
1

It's not a fact. Height doesn't matter significantly. Lmao, bro 😂 You’ve got to be trolling—there’s no way you actually believe what you just wrote
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 04:05 AM
1

Okay, let’s not lie just to try to prove a point. You, I, and everyone on PPD knows that height matters significantly—it’s literally a fact atp.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 03:20 AM
1

>Sabotaging yourself because of what you wrongfully assume women do? I just gave you an example. Do you believe what I said isn’t true? What am I assuming incorrectly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 02:39 AM
1

Obviously, I’m talking about approaching mid women with respect. Just because I said they’re worth less effort doesn’t mean they don’t have the right to have their personal space respected.However, even when approached respectfully, a lot of mid women often seem to take pleasure in rejecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 02:32 AM
0

We're all just 'sex parts of varying levels of attractiveness' to one another. Where do you think I learned this from? It’s the practices of women that helped me gain this perspective—just as they treat men differently based on attractiveness. I’m just copying what y’all do. Let’s not pretend women are inherently wonderful. But I get it—it's not so nice to get a taste of your own medicine, is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 09:09 PM
1

Average or unattractive women often chase after highly attractive men, but these men typically don’t commit—they hook up and then move on. The men who end up dating these women are usually average guys, but there’s a reason why being a boyfriend to an average woman is often seen as a net loss. Why would I treat an average woman the same as a highly attractive one when average women are not only more obsessed with chasing the most attractive men but also tend to project their frustration and rese…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:57 PM
1

I care about looks, but they’re not the only thing I value. I actually responded to a similar question from another user, so I’ll just copy and paste my response here: "I'm not saying I'm not attracted to average-looking women, but I tend to hold them to a higher standard compared to conventionally attractive women. A good analogy would be how women often view height: there's a baseline that might disqualify a man, but beyond that, a shorter man can still compete by excelling in other areas. For…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:47 PM
1

No, I’d say it’s the opposite. Women in the top percentage of attractiveness are generally respectful, even when rejecting someone, as long as you approach them with respect. I can’t say the same for average or below-average women—they often lean into mean or dismissive rejections because it inflates their ego. It’s as if the act of putting someone down gives them a sense of validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:44 PM
1

I'm not saying I'm not attracted to average-looking women, but I tend to hold them to a higher standard compared to conventionally attractive women. A good analogy would be how women often view height: there's a baseline that might disqualify a man, but beyond that, a shorter man can still compete by excelling in other areas. For example, a 5'7" man competing with a 6'0" man would need to put in significantly more effort to stand out. He'd likely need a visibly superior physique—perhaps being ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 08:40 PM
0

I like mid women; I just don’t like them as much as I like hot women. Obviously, I’ll try harder for a fine Stacy over a basic Betty.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:46 AM
0

I don’t care what the red pill says. I believe you can still date or hook up with average women, but you shouldn’t invest too much in them. Focus most of your time and energy on pursuing attractive women instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:43 AM
-7

To invest according.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:41 AM
–

Yeah, I actually am. Now i see this pattern where women who were promiscuous in college suddenly act all traditional, wanting a man to be a protector and provider. It's just disheartening and scary to see how so many women create a facade to trap men .They fake naivety and innocence to attract good, humble men who have worked hard to achieve success.I feel if you've been promiscuous/a hoe, you should own it and not lie about it. Changing your values based on circumstances is extremely problemati…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:57 PM
0

No I'm not...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:48 PM
2

Does the average man start with the same baseline appeal as the average woman? Which gender has to put in more effort to attract the opposite sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:46 PM
1

No, what I'm saying is that the red flag here is circumstantial settling. Following these flags will lead you to a mature woman who values you for the stability you bring, rather than an immature woman who wants to use your resources for her own gain and access to a stable life, only because she realized she wasted her prime chasing shallow gratification.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:45 PM
–

sure...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:39 PM
1

Most women already do that till they get old and lose a lot of their dating leverage.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:39 PM
–

Purple
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:27 PM
1

I mentioned 40+ as a yellow flag...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:40 PM
1

I said it is an important factor, a signifier, not a disqualifier. I think you lack basic reading skills—please read my post again.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:38 PM
2

At this point, I don't think we're even arguing about the post anymore. This was a reason I gave for why these older, single women didn't choose the good men in the past, and I address your point in the last paragraph of the section titled "Why Age Often Correlates With Decision-Making Flags."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:35 PM
-8

Firstly, I’m talking about dating, not marriage. Secondly, how is that good advice? If it worked for your parents, why wouldn’t it work for others? Isn’t that advice a bit paradoxical?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:27 PM
1

Yeah, if you prioritize superficial traits over ethical ones, that's your choice—but you should be prepared to accept the consequences that come with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:24 PM
-8

Yet they've been married for 30 years...especially when divorce rates are so high.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:20 PM
-7

I don't think you read my post carefully. Your age isn't a disqualifier —it simply raises a potential red flag. Look at the first line in Key takeaways: "Not all women fit into these patterns, and there are certainly exceptions." Additionally, I specifically mention that there are men who would date women your age.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:16 PM
-4

By "good," I meant ethically good—a guy who would have treated her right, cared for her as a partner and an equal, and shown genuine respect and consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 08:13 PM
–

Obviously, this perspective is based on my personal experiences, those of my female friends, women I've been involved with, and the experiences of my attractive/unattractive male friends. I've observed these dynamics through my friends, acquaintances, and social circles. I've seen the types of men women chase and the ones they keep as backup options. I've noticed how women treat different men, how certain rules apply to some and not to others. I've observed women who criticize specific issues in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:51 PM
0

It's a pattern I've repeatedly observed throughout my life, whether in my personal experiences or through those of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:15 PM
1

I literally just gave you an example of how women categorize men into boxes based on their level of attractiveness. I simply superimposed women’s dating practices onto men’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 04:02 AM
1

If they don’t, they should work toward achieving it
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:59 AM
3

Dating is inherently unfair, and women often place significant weight on immutable qualities like height, which can feel unjust. But life is unfair, however men still have the opportunity to improve other areas of their lives to compensate for these preferences, even if it requires considerable effort. For example, a short guy (5’7”) with a great body can be on par with a tall guy (6 feet) with a below-average physique. Interestingly, most high-value women tend to prioritize mutable qualities ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:58 AM
1

My post is about men raising their standards and only committing to the Hot Stacy's. Mid-tier Betty isn’t worth the commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:54 PM
1

What "accountability" are they avoiding? I agree that men don’t control commitment, but what I’m saying is that, for men, commitment holds more leverage than sex in the dating market. Hot Stacys definitely exist; there are plenty of attractive women all around. In fact, I’d argue that high-value men are more rare. All I’m saying is that men should raise their standards and work to achieve them. They’re not owed anything; if they choose bad deals, that’s on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:44 PM
3

If a guy is already struggling, why should he simply accept his circumstances instead of working to improve? If you're thirsty in a desert, it doesn’t mean you should drink contaminated water. He should strive to improve enough to date a Hot Stacy, not settle for mid-tier women. He can date mid-tier women as placeholder girlfriends until he can attract a high-value woman, just like how women have their placeholder boyfriends while chasing after Chad’s commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:33 PM
2

Just as women categorize men based on attractiveness—placing them in boxes like the friend zone, boyfriend(stud or beta), I’ve learned this dynamic from women. Why would I choose a woman who was rejected by Chad over one who can reject him to be with me? No commitment is better than being in a relationship with someone who sees you as a backup option.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 11:28 PM
-2

Apparently, this is too controversial for PPD. All I’m saying is that men should raise their standards and work to achieve them. They’re not owed anything; if they choose bad deals, it’s on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:48 PM
1

Both; the goal should be to commit to a Hot Stacy, not an average Betty. However, you don't attract a Hot Stacy by being average yourself—you must always be improving. The average, modern Betty isn't worth the opportunity cost of commitment; she's just practice to learn how to be good at sex for Hot Stacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:36 PM
1

Yup and more men should catch on
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:24 PM
3

Women already do this with casual hookups/ons
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:23 PM
2

My post is based on the fact that you're already hooking up with women, but hey, frame-shifting can be fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:22 PM
-2

You wish
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:17 PM
2

Yup and if you don't, you're the sucker
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:16 PM
3

Unfortunately commitment doesn't really provide that now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:16 PM
1

Exactly if the opportunity cost is so expensive, wouldn't you rather commit to a hot Stacy over mid betty
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:12 PM
3

If you’re not a Chad, there’s a high likelihood you’ll end up with women who are ready to settle down only after 'discovering themselves.' These women are often alpha-widowed, meaning they’re still emotionally attached to a high-value man (Chad) who didn’t choose them. In such scenarios, the value of being a boyfriend is minimal, especially with mid-tier women. With a Hot Stacy, however, you know she’s actively choosing you—even though she still has the option to secure commitment from Chads, sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:10 PM
-7

I agree—men should date and have fun with both hot and mid-level women. However, hot women are the ones you should consider for serious dating and investment, while mid-level women are better suited for casual relationships or friends with benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 09:54 PM
1

From the post: 'I think a lot of men focus on the wrong things... For me, how a woman treats you is far more important than her level of promiscuity or whether she’s a virgin.' This idea of placing so much emphasis on sexual purity doesn’t make much sense to me, especially since how she treats you is way more important. In my opinion, that quality should easily overshadow most other superficial traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 02:22 AM
1

<image> Avg female with 200k+ miles
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 02:06 AM
1

When did I say they are?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 02:02 AM
1

Thank you for actually understanding my point. So many people in the comments misunderstood the main point of argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:52 AM
0

"reformed" tf does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:29 AM
-1

Nooooooo bobby!! Whyd I have to post this. RIP
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:28 AM
1

Thanks bro 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/24 01:25 AM
1

Bro so nauseous he missed the point of my post, time to take your medicine grandpa
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:43 PM
1

huh whats coming?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:41 PM
0

But how do you know she is or is not giving her best to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:39 PM
0

Get a good prenup then
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:38 PM
-2

I think a women who truly loves you is caring and devoted, doesn't really matter if she is promiscuous or trad
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:37 PM
0

Rare doesn't mean extinct
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:36 PM
1

What does this even mean? Who is this man you speak of? Everyone had access to??!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 05:33 PM
1

I think there's a big difference between twerking in the kitchen versus in a club. Plus, she's a content creator, so it's clear there are women like Kya who don't make content—just like there are hitchhikers who vlog, but not all hitchhikers make vlogs. A woman who's happy to cook for someone is incredibly attractive—it gives me the sense that she'd be there for me when I'm sick or vulnerable. Unfortunately, feminism has created this strange idea in some women that doing the bare minimum for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 10:17 PM
2

Damn, she’s really wifey material—hot, caring, and freaky. The kind of woman you’d want to protect and provide for. It’s refreshing to see women like Kya, who are actually worth building a life with, still exist in a sea of pump-and-dump disposables and situationship rentals. Women, do better—it's really not that hard. OP, like all these other women in the comments, is just insecure and jealous.why is it surprising that basic compassion is attractive to men, and we’ll always choose good women ov…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 10:47 PM
1

I don’t think that solves the issue of finding truly fulfilling and safe relationship partners. Plus, isn’t that more exhausting? How do you know you’re getting a better situation? More than likely, you’ll just end up being used.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:21 AM
1

And, how exactly do you accurately vet potential partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:16 AM
1

umm...neither
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:14 AM
1

I think it’s rarer to not land a woman than to land one or more in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:03 AM
2

always do, but I do appreciate the PSA
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:57 AM
6

I’m exhausted. I don’t want to be "good" anymore, but I would never want to be "bad" either. I’ve seen the "bad" side in most women I’ve known or encountered, and now I struggle with trusting. I wish I could vet better, but I haven’t yet identified a clear pattern. I do agree with how you view the morality of goodness. If I meet more women like that in real life, I’d be open to changing my perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:54 AM
1

I don’t get it—how does not investing make it bad? What I’m saying is to not invest and to decentralize yourself from the fantasy. I believe I’m neutral in my perspective. I’m not advocating for being abusive or hateful. In fact, I specifically mention that you shouldn’t resort to those tactics, even though they sometimes seem to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:43 AM
1

Look at my last line: “This doesn’t mean becoming abusive or controlling—those strategies are unethical and unnecessary. Instead, embrace indifference. Focus on building your own life and value, and never let any one woman have the power to devalue you.” I emphasize self-improvement, and the main idea is to decentralize yourself from women and let go of the fantasy of "happily ever after" that doesn’t exist. I also make it clear that being abusive or hateful is not the answer. Most of my casual …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:37 AM
1

I agree with you—absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. There’s nothing I’d want more than to date or meet a woman who proves my cynical worldview wrong. I haven’t found her yet, but I wouldn’t definitively say she doesn’t exist. However, up to this point, I’ve yet to meet her, and my perspective is based on my past and present experiences, not the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:19 AM
1

Yeah, I’d rather not feel this way either, but it seems like the only way I can avoid being played right now. I respect your approach, though—I’m just not there yet. Hopefully, I’ll meet someone in the future who changes my perspective. I’ll keep looking for her; I’m not giving up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:13 AM
3

I think generalizing men is okay when it comes to a woman’s safety. In fact, I would encourage women to do so. We often say, "choose better," but that starts with being cautious. It’s better to be safe than sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:09 AM
0

Not really—I don’t think promiscuity is the problem. I’ve observed the same issues with both promiscuous and non-promiscuous women. In fact, I’d argue that non-promiscuous women are more likely to become "alpha widowed." Blaming promiscuity overlooks the deeper issue: a lack of empathy and a lack of value placed on loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:06 AM
0

I've seen genuinely good guys get cheated on, while shady, manipulative men somehow always have women infatuated with them. Just look at this sub: women often emphasize that being a good guy is the bare minimum and doesn't "move the needle." But if that's the standard, why do these "bad men" still succeed? From my own experience, my very attractive friend has slept with or hooked up with women who already have boyfriends. How can I ignore what I’ve witnessed? Sure, there might be women who aren’…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 07:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter