TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BitesTheDust55 Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by BitesTheDust55 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They've learned. Lower testosterone levels and plentiful copes make the historical outcome far less likely in the modern day.
/r/MensRights30/07/26 06:20 AM
2

"Men suffering, Women Most Affected"
/r/MensRights30/07/26 06:19 AM
34

This is the answer I always point to.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:27 AM
4

Meh, it'd be easy to make this go away with a threat to sue for custody. If they want the dough, then I want the kid.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 05:13 PM
2

I have good news for you.
/r/MensRights23/05/26 01:54 PM
11

The manosphere is just the natural reaction to the world that feminism created. It's a symptom. Dating was ruined before it came along.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:24 AM
2

Can't really say things like this on reddit. It will be taken as hate speech. That is not a judgment on the actual content, I'm just letting you know what this site is like in terms of what kind of discourse it allows.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 09:17 PM
53

Becoming? They've been anti men for a decade. Even before that the seeds were FIRMLY rooted.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 07:07 AM
6

Well yeah. A lot of the white collar jobs that women do are basically adult day care. If you followed that TikTok trend awhile back you know what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 12:27 PM
1

Probably not. Testosterone rates are falling and we're getting to the beautiful ones stage of humanity's universe 25 equivalent. Years ago I would've said yes, definitely a powder keg. Now I don't think so.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 11:30 AM
1

No, and the use of "bad actors" as a way to discredit what should be a totally valid movement is just indicative of the gynocracy we live in. If bad actors had been a reason to discredit a movement, feminism never would've made it off the ground.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:19 AM
19

Because society simultaneously infantilizes women while pushing them to be equals to men. When the two are at odds, dumb things happen (whatever choice is more favorable to the woman is usually defaulted to).
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:27 PM
2

I have no issue with a single women's only car in public transit. Japan has it too.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 05:26 PM
35

As if the school system in the west weren't already massively tailored to women and girls lmao
/r/MensRights11/02/26 03:19 AM
5

Be careful. Once you take the blackpill the way back is nearly impossible. Most people of both sexes are just normal fine people.
/r/MensRights22/01/26 08:20 AM
15

I just want FPH back. Reddit really does need someone to come in and clean house but I don't know if Elon has it in him.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 10:18 AM
3

There really isnt ever a good reason to perform that procedure on an infant boy. Not now that we know there aren't benefits.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:53 PM
3

I laugh everytime someone tries to gaslight about abortion never being used as birth control. Also I hate it.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:35 PM
2

Eh nothing surprises me anymore. These women are scum.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 02:21 PM
6

You know why.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 10:10 PM
27

In a word? It's retarded. I'm not sure it deserves any further commentary beyond that.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 08:54 PM
72

Autistic women are seen as cute and silly. Endearing, even. If anything, it's a slight plus. Autistic men are... Not.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 03:28 PM
2

Hell of an article. Read it earlier this week. The outrage should be much greater than it is.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 09:30 PM
1

Is it any surprise? A good article from the other day on men being frozen out of advancement. I can only imagine what it must have been like for any white male starting their career in the 2015-2025 era. Just pure humiliation ritual and despair.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 07:33 AM
7

If a doctor says it's the only way is what I meant. If there are alternative treatments that are effective those should ALWAYS be pursued before surgery is considered.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 05:23 AM
3

It should not be legal to perform this procedure except in cases of medical necessity (phimosis). End of story. The fact that we allow it precludes us from being a civilized nation.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 02:40 AM
-4

I mean, is he wrong though? You think women are going to get turned on by going Dutch? Set aside for a moment whether or not that is fair, moral or equal. Is it TRUE? Because I think it's true. Even for feminists who talk the talk, at the end of the day they want a guy who makes more than they do and pays their way, even if they're a doctor or lawyer who pulls down 150k+. We can either acknowledge that's the reality and play by those rules, or whine impotently about it. Yeah, it sucks. But nobod…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:18 AM
6

Ah yes. Only open to <everyone other than straight white men>. Equity, woooooo.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 02:44 AM
-8

The only reason you're downvoted is you are correct. But it's easier to blackpill and go full doomer. I'm pretty much fully blackpilled at this point. Hard not to be. Glad you found happiness though.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:10 PM
4

Marriage isn't even real in 2025. It's for show. No fault divorce has been a disaster for western society. It incentivizes people's worst instincts.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 08:03 AM
1

Oh?
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:56 AM
1

If they have some skill or are needed for some dangerous or disgusting manual labor job like oil rig worker or sanitation engineer, then it's that. If they do not have a skill or the propensity to work in a dangerous or disgusting job, then the answer is nothing, and society legitimately does not care if they live or die.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 12:31 PM
3

And she'll never see consequences because men are not a marginalized group on reddit so reporting her will do nothing. It's okay if you're sexist to men, but say this about women and you WILL have your account permabanned. It's so fucked.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 12:09 PM
1

Far more than we as a society would ever care to admit.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 01:23 PM
19

That is unfortunately not an uncommon state to be in. The reality is you won't be able to get everything you want. Men are either going to be crushed underfoot by the side that hates them but doesn't mind if they're vulnerable, or placed in a traditional role that demands a certain toll by the side that values them. There is no in between. You'll have to make a value judgment.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 12:14 PM
1

Depends on which subgroup. By rate, there is one subgroup of women that has a higher rate of committing murder than two subgroups of men. Generally speaking though, men commit murder at a considerably higher rate than women on average.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:24 PM
16

Modern society is built on women being able to avoid accountability for their decisions. Sex, pregnancy, not staying with dad. Women can just say no to the consequences of all of it, and that leads to bad behavior. The whole system is predicated on that now. Men pay for it all.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 03:03 AM
26

You have to wonder just how high the rate of paternity fraud must be there for this to have been considered a priority/acceptable. I can't imagine it's less than 10% of all babies born in that country.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:18 AM
45

It would cause the state to be the paying party instead of the alleged father significantly more often. So they have a material financial incentive to not want this. The state does whatever it can to avoid paying for kids. That means sticking some guy, ANY guy with the bill instead. If he can get away just with a paternity test, oh boy that's not good!
/r/MensRights16/11/25 12:00 AM
83

How dare you judge all women for something only 75% of them do!
/r/MensRights15/11/25 02:57 PM
4

I wish I had more evidence than anecdotal. But every guy has seen a video, or experienced himself, or had a friend who has experienced a woman using the threat of crying rape as a cudgel to get what she wants. To coerce behavior. Because even an unsubstantiated allegation is enough to completely ruin a man's life - job, social circle, everything. And men know this. Nobody knows how high the actual number is. But the idea that it's only 2% is so ludicrous it doesn't even come close to passing the…
/r/MensRights15/11/25 03:48 AM
10

Men are primarily valued on what they can produce or provide. Take that away and their value as humans and especially as mates disappears. It has been this way forever but nowadays it seems especially cruel because it is harder to be a provider than ever.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 02:24 PM
4

Feminism is for women. It's in the name. That is its purpose, even if there have been significant efforts through the years to make people think it's for true equality. As soon as you argue that feminists should be putting in work to get more women employed as oil rig workers or garbage collectors the view on equality suddenly changes. They want the good, with none of the bad or the accountability. This has been so thoroughly observed that it has become something heavily associated with the term…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:16 PM
3

If you can forge good times do so. But if you can't, you shouldn't wallow in shame about it, because it genuinely isn't your fault. If the juice ain't worth the squeeze, you can hardly fault someone for letting the orange tree's bounty go to waste.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 12:00 PM
0

Because feminism is a women's advocacy group. Not an equality seeking one. No matter what they say.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 08:00 PM
4

Yep. Hoe_math has some videos that explain part of why this is. Women just have a different value structure, especially in the modern day western world. They do not operate on the same system of wants and reciprocity that men do. That's part of why so many men fall into the trap of just treating women like they themselves would like to be treated.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 09:59 AM
30

Simple, to the point, true.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 11:48 PM
16

Humiliation ritual, aimed as usual, at white males. Many such cases.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:05 PM
17

This is a good answer. If you're ever unsure of why something occurs, first ask "who benefits?" You will be able to find the thread from there.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 10:16 PM
5

It is a thing, and it is well understood. When the conditions in society allow for it to come into being, it will do so, because it is preferable for the sex that selects. It was the inevitable result of giving women political agency. This is not a judgment, it is simply a fact.
/r/MensRights21/10/25 08:05 PM
28

It has been for some time. The college degree of today is less valuable than the high school degree of 40 years ago. I don't even think it's that close, either.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 09:50 PM
21

She may actually be that deluded. She's not the first woman who got tricked into genuinely believing that narrative and she won't be the last.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 06:00 PM
1

No, boys have different strengths. But the school system in the west is not particularly suited to them.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 10:12 AM
2

This is likely part of it. The difference in how teachers treat boys compared to girls is well documented. It could have a greater contributing effect than I thought.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 09:45 AM
10

Girls are better at following rules/directions, sitting still, listening to other people speak and learning in that way. They're better at rote repetition, which favors test based learning (things like flashcards and memorization favor girls).
/r/MensRights29/09/25 12:34 AM
37

The entire k-12 system has largely been designed around ensuring the success of girls. The assumption that boys will just make do as they always have is baked into that. Of course, a variety of factors come together to ensure that this is the case less and less of the time. The "someone drones at me for 6 hours a day while I sit still and listen quietly" method of learning is trash. It disincentivizes boys from becoming interested in learning while catering to the strengths of girls.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 08:10 PM
9

Lmao good luck with that. Would any German man actually fight to protect... Whatever the fuck that country has turned into?
/r/MensRights29/08/25 12:39 AM
2

An obsolete at best, utterly destructive at worst ideology.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 03:08 PM
14

She sprints away from accountability just like women love to do. She just happens to be faster. Enjoy jail, sweetie.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:32 AM
32

This is the natural and logical outcome of a society that teaches its children from a very young age that women have always been oppressed, abused and unhappy, and men have always been oppressors and abusers. We are reaping what the groups with the microphones in the 90s and early 00s have sown.
/r/MensRights20/07/25 01:35 AM
25

Female loneliness is by choice in nearly all cases. Male loneliness is involuntary in most cases. There is a huge difference.
/r/MensRights19/07/25 12:25 PM
82

Is it surprising? If I went from playing a game on easy or story mode to playing it on Nightmare or Dante Must Die, it'd be horrendous whiplash. I'd give up and switch back too.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 06:55 AM
7

An absolutely embarrassing thing to say.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 02:59 PM
1

Once I stopped and actually considered that masculine responses are often naturally angry and that that was not necessarily a bad thing to be stigmatized or demonized it changed how I approached feminism and the vilification of masculinity in general.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:23 AM
10

Nothing positive. It also means we can't really fix any of our mid and long term problems because women don't want them fixed. When I realized that was when I got fully blackpilled. In the past, a strong leader could have worked toward a solution - albeit a difficult one - to much of what we're facing. But now, that strong leader doesn't make it through primaries. Because he's perceived as too mean, or too radical, or not pretty enough to woo women voters.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 05:43 AM
9

Hmmm. I used to think first wave was fine. But my understanding of the problems we face has evolved, and now I don't know if it was ever a good thing. Third wave feminism is indefensible, though. That much I am 100% sure of.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 05:17 AM
5

Oh absolutely. People are nicer to women in general. Interesting that you personally get to see both sides.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 05:55 PM
8

Definitely dont do it. It's barbaric.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 11:22 AM
32

I'll always have great respect for Nora Vincent for what she did. Few people can walk a mile in others' shoes. She really manned up and saw what it was like, and regardless of what caused it I think her suicide was tragic.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 12:16 AM
137

This is why when a rape accusation is made, I'm immediately skeptical. No proof? She's probably lying.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter