TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BitterDivorcedDad Archive

View 9 posts and 363 comments by BitterDivorcedDad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Do not, and I mean DO NOT sign a birth certificate if she has a baby. If you do sign, you’re dad by default regardless of a DNA test. I've watched men get trapped in court again and again when they responded in the positive when the judged asked if they were the father of a child. Seriously good advice from /u/thefudmaster Be careful where you put your penis next time.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:00 PM
2

Pro tip: never ever admit in court that a child is yours. Have your lawyer demand a genetic test. (And hope like hell that she hasn't been banging your brother/uncle/father.) She knows that she's the mother. She doesn't know who the father is. You definitely do not know who the father of any given child is. If you say in court that a child is yours, then you are on the hook forever. Same thing happens when you sign the birth certificate. We're raised to want to have as much sex as we can get. Tr…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 05:55 PM
1

She's really easing you into it. The judge will let her do whatever she wants, of course.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:11 PM
1

Plain doesn't get in the way of fashion and makeup.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:45 AM
2

Ohio is a single-party consent state. He doesn't need to tell her. http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/ohio/ohio-recording-law
/r/MensRights27/04/18 10:52 AM
4

And by "dog", you mean "father".
/r/MensRights03/03/17 01:14 PM
2

Been there, done that. The best part was having to pay support (= gather debt) based on my previous job's income while I was unemployed. In good news, you no longer owe dead people child support money.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:23 PM
1

/u/originalSpacePirate didn't say what you think he(?) said.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:22 PM
11

Or my late ex-wife. Wait
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:20 PM
1

And there you have it. The men her age have their pick and she ain't it.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 06:35 PM
3

/s
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:46 AM
7

You're being awfully hard on a widow, man.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:03 AM
5

Ya gotta split things by time zones/free times.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:53 PM
2

Same as it ever was.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 08:28 PM
3

The Great People's Council has declared you to be misogynistic. You are hereby ordered to report to your nearest Wymyn's Learning Center at your local Patriarchy Inculcation Center for re-education.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:16 PM
3

Be attractive
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:41 PM
1

Yes, of that I'm well-aware, although I've met Indian Christians. Their names usually give them away. And yes, that would be adultery…unless they were widows.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 11:55 PM
1

It's simply Old Testament marriage, provided she was a virgin when they had sex.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:48 AM
2

Not if she's underage.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:35 AM
21

Alimony isn't allocated based on living expenses. Or any other sort of expenses.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 08:08 PM
1

I thought that the video was going to go in a completely different direction, given the name of the vlogger and the name of the video. (Guess I'm just a dirty old man.) Thanks for the tip, though!
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:56 PM
1

Prostate cancer generally hits you when you're old, and it's a slow cancer. Again, speaking generally. There is no cure. You can do treatments, but as of a decade ago (last time I checked), your life expectancy was unchanged by any treatments you undertook (unless the treatment itself killed you). As you're old when you get it, you're more likely to die of other things before the prostate cancer kills you.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:46 PM
4

tl;dr: Lawyer up with an attorney who is exceedingly familiar with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA). http://www.justice.gov/crt/spec_topics/military/scra.php
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:41 PM
1

Mother's Day: That's when Dad takes the kid[s] out and spends time with them so Mom can go out with the girls or have her day of beauty and pampering. Father's Day: That's when Dad takes the kid[s] out and spends time with them. Mom is left to her own devices.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:38 PM
2

It's the smoke from the BBQ. Pardon me. I'm going to go log off and finish that bottle of bourbon.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:29 PM
1

Thank you for this. So there's some hope. At what age did you reunite with your father?
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:29 PM
4

Typical money-grubber.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:26 PM
3

And she's a widow, I take it? Women who are widowed young are a special breed that I have yet to understand.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 01:53 PM
0

The 90s are calling and they want their license plate frame back.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:34 AM
3

And probation at that. And excused with no permanent mark on her record.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:36 AM
16

You're mistaking a false accusation with one that for some reason doesn't have sufficient evidence to make a conviction.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 11:35 AM
3

Actually, Alice's name really is Alice. Helen's name really is Helen. (Scott didn't even capture her in the office, because he never worked with her, just heard about her, or there would have been other things in the strip about her.) Source: I worked with both Helen and Alice.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:50 AM
3

No, that's what it says on the back of those Italian suppositories. "Directions: Innuendo."
/r/MensRights23/03/13 12:48 AM
1

It's probably not even yours. And listen to LaFridge - record everything. Keep one of those Olympus voice recorders on you and turn it on when speaking to her. Have a video camera handy in your pocket, too. When your attorney says "My client has video." to the judge - those are very powerful words.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:41 AM
2

Never concede anything.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 12:18 PM
1

[Mom] is worried about you doing things that she knows that she would do, given half the chance. NO to #7. You don't want your son spending 50% of his time with a crazy person - don't you remember what it was like?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:23 AM
1

And people call me "bitter".
/r/MensRights15/09/12 12:06 AM
3

Well, don't do the latter. Video recorder on you and charged at all times. Audio recorder on you and charged at all times.
/r/MensRights14/09/12 01:06 PM
1

True. There are so many times when she should have been charged with purjury and contempt of court, but that wasn't about to happen in that particular judge's courtroom.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:17 AM
5

And they'll be bitching about the lack of "quality men" all the way to the battery store.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:56 AM
2

"My client has videotape." carries a surprising weight in court, even with a hostile (to you) judge.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:36 AM
13

This kind of shit happens all the time. A friend of mine (as in a person I actually know in-person, who is a friend) managed to get his wife on tape stating that she was going to lie and say that he was abusing her as she was hitting him and pushing him down the stairs. Lucky for him, he didn't live in a community with "white knight" cops and she went to jail for her crime. (Not for long, as he was guilted into reducing the charges, but it did make an impression on her. In retrospect, he says th…
/r/MensRights12/06/12 11:21 AM
2

Exactly. In so-called "two party" states, this may very well come under them. My attorney's advice was to use a video recorder and to wear it openly.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 11:19 AM
2

Yep. He got railroaded.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 01:21 AM
0

I don't follow every case out there, but OK. A quick dig on the google shows that either 17 is the age of consent or that you're likely to get in trouble if you're over 20 and your partner is 17.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:44 AM
6

What? Scott Peterson was convicted in 2005. Yes, he's appealing the conviction, but he's in San Quentin.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:17 AM
1

That's not the point. It's 18 in some other states.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 11:11 AM
0

Of course it is, but it's going to go on as long as the women think they can force the procedure to happen and the doctors can profit from it.
/r/MensRights07/12/11 03:31 AM
1

Check your pants. Is there a penis in there? If so, No.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:17 AM
3

If you have to ask...
/r/MensRights13/11/11 11:14 AM
5

Please tell me that you have at least two packages of vegetables in your freezer. A bag of frozen peas is the best ice-pack for helping you heal. Also, taking tomorrow off is probably a good idea, too.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:04 PM
84

And don't mention your vasectomy because then you'll be able to detect the truly evil women who claim you knocked them up when the birth control failed.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:03 PM
3

She'll soon treat your former "friend" in the same way.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:49 PM
2

Sounds like California.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:47 PM
1

hookers Some sort of new pussy, at least.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:45 PM
1

Sure, guys can orgasm without ejaculating. I have to wonder just what it would take to teach yourself how to do that. Multiple orgasms, too. This book is recommended … at the very least, the exercises therein are fun.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 03:30 PM
2

Hey, a boy needs his mother.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 11:50 PM
4

You know that he deserved it.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 02:19 PM
4

"Should" and "Will happen" appear to be two different things. It would seem as if she has her employer by the short and curlies already.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:44 PM
1

She'll probably suck some guy into her orbit.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:09 PM
4

Such a nice girl.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:08 PM
1

I know exactly how you feel. I don't think that one ever recovers.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:24 PM
7

Borderline Personality Disorder. It might be partially-inherited. It is definitely associated with abuse in childhood. They do get abusive. They do tend to abuse drugs. They learn early on how to find their victims, Brother.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:54 AM
1

Looks at camp shirt, shorts, sandals, and starts to quietly sob
/r/MensRights19/08/11 01:22 AM
4

Eventually you'll be middle-aged yourself.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 09:55 PM
1

Usually, when a judge is suddenly moved, it's for punishment. Priests often get rewarded. You'd think that the Church of Rome existed for baby-fucking, given their behaviour.
/r/MensRights11/08/11 12:29 PM
2

I'd considered setting up something similar [REDACTED] years ago but was concerned that the VAWA had already banned such a thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:16 AM
4

It won't happen. Worst case, the judge is pushed out to another courtroom, perhaps in a different part of the jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights10/08/11 10:15 AM
2

Until he's injured, unless he lives in a few special places in the United States, he will be the one getting a free ride in the back of the cruiser. Even if he is visibly injured, she just might go Fight Club on his ass and injure herself more. Do remember that self-harm shows up in BPD.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:22 PM
1

Problems are a disagreement over which way to put the toilet paper. Problems are not being able to agree on beef or chicken. Bananaphone's wife is just plain psycho and would have been locked up for life, doped to the gills in another era.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:21 PM
6

We've been to a few different marriage counselors and she doesn't put any of what they recommend into practice. The light-bulb has to really want to change.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:19 PM
12

Truer words have never been spoken.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:17 PM
1

may have a borderline personality disorder as well Trust me on this: RUN she will tell me I'm the best husband in the world one minute and then tell me I'm awful the next RUN LIKE THE WIND, TOTO!!! I have a feeling she may get angry enough to throw something heavy at me someday. Be sure to get photos. These will be of use later. It's not only baby-crazy, brother, but a deeper syndrome. Just wait until the post-partum depression kicks in. You haven't seen crazy yet.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:16 PM
1

That's because they're not Rich People. "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and the poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread." Anatole France, Le Lys Rouge
/r/MensRights24/06/11 04:47 PM
1

And certainly can't give consent, let alone informed consent.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 07:43 PM
2

We'd be starting at the same place. My memory of the debunking appearing about two decades ago, not withstanding. The anti-circ websites would be a great place to start, then the Google. Specifically, it's cervical cancer. However, I'm feeling unusually charitable today so here's a PDF of a study about Jewish women's rate of cervical cancer. Do note that they find an unusually high incidence in Jewish women born in North Africa (excluding Morocco). The meat of the discussion (so to speak) starts…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:50 PM
6

Sometimes wisdom teeth need to come out because they're impacted and will screw up your teeth if they're allowed to do their own thing. A cleft palate, as I understand it, causes other problems. Fixing those is the right thing to do. There's the "lowered risk of cervical cancer" canard, and after that was debunked a good two decades ago (wash your dick), it's now "circumcised men have a lower incidence of HIV" being promoted as the reason to mutilate little boys. (This is probably another "Wash …
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:26 PM
9

San Francisco is trying. Unfortunately, the person pushing it is an Anti-Semite. It should be banned along with any other not-medically-necessary surgery on children, such as plastic surgery and female circumcision.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 03:47 PM
6

Jewish tradition says that the baby has to be circumcised by his eighth day of life - so the bris typically happens on the 8th day. Now, some branches of Judaism say that the bris is an outdated thing and can be skipped ... others will accept a symbolic nick. Both groups are probably what a friend calls "Reformies".
/r/MensRights17/06/11 03:44 PM
1

No particular reason. Just popped into my head. Given that everyone in the UK lives so close to one another and the prevalence of people cheating with their SO's siblings, it has to have happened more than once, and probably happens at a significant rate.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:38 PM
1

And would the testing performed catch paternity fraud where the true father was closely related?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 04:44 PM
2

Yet directly in line with earlier studies. I believe the figure was the same in the UK.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:51 PM
15

Wallet with legs.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 08:28 PM
6

Tell that to the Library of Alexandria.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 05:11 PM
2

As do the Irish.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:40 PM
0

Death cures pretty much everything though.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:35 PM
-2

I've got no dog in this fight.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 03:34 PM
3

I expect that shortly he'll be reprimanded for not holding the door for a different woman.
/r/MensRights29/03/11 04:05 PM
5

HR guy?
/r/MensRights29/03/11 11:33 AM
11

More to the point, false child abuse accusations, which, until fairly recently, were a staple in divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 04:08 PM
4

Or children.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 05:05 PM
12

I was going to say "Flip the genders and the author would be hung as a Male Chauvinist Pig."
/r/MensRights05/03/11 11:30 PM
3

A gram is better than a damn.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 02:26 AM
9

It time for women to woman-up. Stop being insufferable nags. Stop denying men the right to visit their children. Stop filing for divorces in record numbers. (emphasis mine) And people wonder why some men snap.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 01:51 AM
0

Pussy makes you stupid.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:26 PM
12

Women have been working and have had jobs for all of history. Alimony is nothing but punishment.
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:22 PM
5

Whoa, I thought I got fucked up the butt without lube with a 1/8th net assessment for life. (Add 3/8ths net for child support until the kid turns 18 and graduates HS … or reaches age 19 w/o graduating)
/r/MensRights22/02/11 04:19 PM
2

Exactly. Even if she keeps the kid from him and he has no contact.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:16 AM
1

Source
/r/MensRights08/02/11 01:52 PM
2

Jul 7, 2010 ZOMG that's so out of date!
/r/MensRights08/02/11 01:45 PM
14

In Silicon Valley, some women expect you to bring a copy of your portfolio, and I'm not talking about Art.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 10:33 PM
0

Not all American woman are like that, fortunately.
/r/MensRights16/01/11 04:24 PM
2

Oh, a Chinese Girlfriend is someone with serious control issues or perhaps even Borderline Personality Disorder.
/r/MensRights15/01/11 06:01 PM
2

Schools are required to report even suspected abuse.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 02:51 PM
5

And there are people to this day who believe that SRA is rampant and must be protected against.
/r/MensRights12/01/11 02:51 PM
2

No different from "recovered memories".
/r/MensRights12/01/11 02:40 PM
2

So "Poe's Law" applies in other contexts, eh?
/r/MensRights07/01/11 11:04 PM
2

Once you're old enough. Try getting one in the USA when you're in your twenties.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 10:54 PM
2

"I don't believe in Parental Alienation Syndrome." --My Judge
/r/MensRights07/01/11 10:46 PM
5

It's because the child support office at the state level gets a cut. They don't give a flying fuck about the children. They're just angry people with power to screw with you.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 10:41 PM
0

If a woman puts her kid up for adoption, she doesn't have the kid and she doesn't owe anything to anyone, ever. If the court makes it so that you can't see or talk to your kid ever again, you still owe child support. Spousal support, too.
/r/MensRights07/01/11 10:41 PM
1

A friend got burned because the site was not up to date.
/r/MensRights04/01/11 07:36 AM
2

And you can reject the first judge…don't know if you can reject any more, but I know you can definitely reject the assigned judge within 24hrs of assignment. You determine by asking around, including asking the attorney about their relationships with the judges in the family court. You could show up and just observe the judges in action as well as the attorneys that appear before them - there are some that show up all the time. Are they prepared? Do they get their way?
/r/MensRights03/01/11 10:33 PM
0

Other than the fact that your attorney must be a member of the Calif. bar in good standing, the most important factor is does the judge you get know your attorney and like him or her. If your judge has a disliking for your attorney, you're fucked. If your judge decides that she or he doesn't like you, you're fucked. Trust me on this.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 08:37 PM
0

What Elesia said.
/r/MensRights03/01/11 08:35 PM
2

Not that their site is actually up to date or anything. Be sure to get a declaration that he's a member of the bar in good standing and that there are no pending actions against him (wording may need fixup) from the guy you give your money to. A friend got bit by this. (Yes, you can sue after, but it's a pain in the ass - then you need to collect when you win.)
/r/MensRights03/01/11 08:34 PM
2

If they've turned evil, then all bets are off. But I bet she wasn't having sex with you, just letting you get a whiff so you'd stick around.
/r/MensRights23/12/10 06:22 PM
2

But what about our relationship?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 02:03 PM
9

That's not a cave…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 05:25 PM
1

But most of us are stuck with windows. I'm sure there's some alt+numbers combo that would bring it up, though. At that point, you might as well have a file full of useful glyphs open in another window for copy/paste goodness.
/r/MensRights11/12/10 04:24 PM
2

You can tell that I'm male because I have: child support payments alimony payments no custody no visitation All thanks to the male-unfriendly court.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 04:14 PM
3

The spelling error offends me.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 08:05 PM
3

I wish I had an Uncle like that. Not dead, but wise.
/r/MensRights30/10/10 07:18 PM
1

They should have used DEVO's "Space Junk" song for the theme.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 02:13 PM
9

Think of the children!
/r/MensRights23/09/10 05:15 PM
2

Pre-marital property is exempt in California. One of the few items of sanity in that state's divorce law.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 12:30 PM
1

The man speaks sooth. Calculating? She's evil.
/r/MensRights22/09/10 12:26 PM
8

What Hat-Trick said. You are not stupid. You woke up late, but hell, you did your homework, Brother, and that's more than what most of us did.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 09:38 PM
1

Bitter dudes don't get shout-outs.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 12:21 PM
0

Yeah, they got bald because they didn't take care of themselves.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 12:21 PM
1

Oh, she's been experiencing that for years now. She asked for a handyman allowance from the court at one point.
/r/MensRights12/09/10 09:30 AM
2

Daaaamn. Did they all come from the same mothership?
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:08 AM
1

Thank you, but it's waaaay late. I'll take that as a wish for peace, and I thank you.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 04:08 AM
3

My life as a married man was much like yours, except that I got the kid ready for school - waking, gathering her stuff, making sure she washed (or had washed the night before), ate her breakfast, brushed her teeth, then drove her to school (in a direction away from the office), and finally going to work myself. Then when I got back from work, either shop and make or fetch the meal (far too often becs the "little" lady had too much to do in her half-day of "work" to have any energy left to actual…
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:52 PM
1

Dude, your last two sentences were awesome.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:47 PM
1

Things get exponentially worse with time, since you will accumulate debt/property and perhaps children Listen to this man. He speaks sooth.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:44 PM
11

The common factor in all of your dysfunctional relationships is you. If you've never had a positive relationship with a women, you are at least partially at fault. Look closely at how you treat your partners or how you pick them. or how you pick them ^ This being something that we have been programmed to do by our life experiences. We may have been pre-programmed to pick someone very toxic for us - I know that myself and a number of my fellow brothers have been. Looking at how we pick our mates …
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:39 PM
4

Shit, I wish I'd heard of this. I should have tried harder to find a doc to do it for me, dammit.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:35 PM
3

I have like 6 or 7 stories like this one in my last month. Holy crap, brah, you need to figure out how to attract less attention.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 10:32 PM
1

Alcohol can cause you to miss.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:54 PM
2

But three lefts do.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:54 PM
4

California, for one. Maybe it's not the standard, but it's a risk.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:38 PM
1

Which never stopped the courts from assigning ridiculous sentences for victimless crimes.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 04:36 PM
24

No, plus 200% - the usual civil standard of triple damages.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 09:06 AM
5

Translation: She caught him masturbating and decided to do something about it.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 01:35 AM
18

There's no legal requirement that child support be spent on the child. In reality, it's another name for alimony.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 04:27 PM
-1

Disassemble the hard drive(s), scatter the platters in different parts of town, preferably no-where with a securecam watching. All it takes is a set of small Torx bits or a Cybertool. Platters in page-sized envelopes will be less obvious. No more computers in the house.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 09:33 PM
1

I do.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 09:29 PM
1

All I did was buy and replace a car battery. I feel like such a schlub.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 11:23 PM
1

reads Wikipedia article Damn. "Obit anus, abit onus" would make a damn fine tattoo. And I don't like tattoos.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:42 PM
2

Be good to yourself. You do not have to put up with anyone committing emotional or physical violence upon your person. Whose name is on the lease? If she's not on it, get the locks changed, keep a charged cell phone handy for dialing 911 and call the cops if she shows up and does not immediately leave. A woman like that, when faced with rejection, will go off the rails and is capable of anything. You are not worthless. You are embarking on a noble life course. Stick with it, get that white coat,…
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:18 PM
1

Good luck, Brother.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:11 AM
1

THIS. Having a video camera in your hand may not prevent someone from doing something stupid, but when your lawyer says in court "My client has videotape", especially in response to a false accusation, that quiets the harridan down toot sweet.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:03 AM
1

You should find this amusing, then. NSFW.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 09:24 PM
3

Yes, because women's has been suppressed for far longer than ours. Also, we're still expected to be sexually predatory, even in the face of the feminist agenda. Consider if the genders were reversed for shows like sex in the city, do you think it would air? It was called Manchild. Terrible title, very interesting show. More cerebral. There was an American remake but I've never seen it. Probably sucked. Men of a Certain Age appears to be another American remake.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 08:44 PM
3

Signs of age appear at different ages for different women. If you pay attention, you'll find that some women's breasts start sagging when their teens. You'll find stretch marks on skinny Japanese twenty-somethings on vacation. Wrinkles develop at the points where the skin routinely flexes - try dating an actress or ballerina some time and you'll find that they try their best to keep a flat expression out of fear of developing them. Everyone's fat distribution shifts as they age, with negroes gai…
/r/MensRights08/08/10 08:04 PM
5

We have extremely strong socialization towards keeping women asexual outside of their relationship with their life partner. This often backfires such that they're asexual aside from the desire to have children. When a woman is confident in her sexuality, men and women alike will label her "whore", "slut", "trollop", etc. I believe that it takes until her late thirties or fifties for most women to break that socialization. The impetus certainly comes from "fading looks" (=lack of youth) for some …
/r/MensRights08/08/10 07:52 PM
2

Coached, I'm sure. His life is going to be interesting.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 07:38 PM
1

Struth.
/r/MensRights08/08/10 01:29 PM
0

Oh, it will happen here and there. Just you wait, especially given the press this one has gotten. Now, try applying it in the other direction. Yeah.
/r/MensRights07/08/10 12:49 AM
-2

You know he drove her to it.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 08:05 PM
-10

Have you considered that most, if not all, of the people involved in porn have some sort of diagnosable condition? (And dominated by Borderlines and Narcissists, too) That you might be conditioning yourself towards them in real life?
/r/MensRights01/08/10 05:41 AM
2

There's nothing in the law that says that child support money must be spent on the children.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 01:25 AM
-2

You didn't win. At least your ex hasn't figured out that there are no penalties to her for withholding the kids from you.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 10:04 PM
2

Why the downvotes? That's a perfectly legit reason for the judge to recuse himself.
/r/MensRights25/07/10 10:55 PM
2

I never saw a woman sent to jail although a lot of them should have been . And how many men did you see go to jail during that time?
/r/MensRights25/07/10 10:53 PM
3

I feel for you, Brother. I know full well just how psycho some of these women get and how the courts support them, even when they lie to the judge's face.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 12:19 AM
-1

Never mind the contempt the "wife" holds for the man she's married to.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 01:18 AM
2

You can have love without marriage.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 12:34 AM
0

Which doctors routinely deny to young men.
/r/MensRights09/07/10 12:25 AM
-3

Ok, what were they before the kid turned 18? If all they wanted was a baby, they could go out to a bar, get laid, and have a baby. To go through the whole marriage thing with an eye to jettisoning the husband when the kid is 18 implies other motives.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:39 PM
10

Very interesting that in the UK you need the Mum's permission to do a paternity test. It's almost as if the lawmakers knew what the results would be up-front.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 11:07 PM
1

That could be too - perhaps the writer didn't realize that the WC is a once every 4 years event?
/r/MensRights08/07/10 09:35 PM
2

They probably meant that. "A sports day vs a non-sports day."
/r/MensRights08/07/10 09:17 PM
5

Kids are a lot more perceptive than we know. Those relationships are toxic and it shows in how the children behave.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 07:41 PM
8

It would be one thing if they both were in on it. To decide that by yourself and treat your husband as if he were something other than a walking wallet is something else entirely.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 05:35 PM
2

It's deceitful.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 05:35 PM
5

a little bit shitty So for 20 years you think that your wife loves you only to find out at birth+18 she hates your guts? A "little bit" shitty?
/r/MensRights08/07/10 05:34 PM
3

Let us not forget that the "same day last year" fell on a different day of the week. Last year 6/27 was a Saturday. This year a Sunday.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 04:39 PM
8

I would hear my ex-wife talking to her friends about how they were going to divorce their husbands as soon as the (last) kid turned 18.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 04:32 PM
7

Of course. Women are precious like china dolls and should be protected. There are always more men around.
/r/MensRights08/07/10 01:15 PM
5

WTF is wrong with a man wearing sandals? Jesus wore sandals.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 02:05 PM
1

This sounds kind of like the American remake of "Manchild". (Horrid title, great show)
/r/MensRights06/07/10 01:49 PM
2

I have several gay friends in their sixties who ended up doing that and having an awful divorce later.
/r/MensRights01/07/10 03:03 AM
6

This is a rare and isolated incident. All the others accused are guilty - if not of that, then of other horrific things.</sarcasm>
/r/MensRights30/06/10 03:21 PM
3

I feel for you, Brother.
/r/MensRights28/06/10 03:12 AM
1

I can see that. Interesting point of view.
/r/MensRights26/06/10 12:50 AM
1

Can you say "cold hearted bitch?" "My ex-wife."
/r/MensRights25/06/10 09:24 PM
2

Yeah, if they really hated gays, then they'd want them to suffer just like the rest of us.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 09:22 PM
2

You never really know someone until you're getting divorced from them.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 09:22 PM
1

Those damn men. Always dropping vases. It's not as if they don't have a good dozen of 'em. And they're cheap-ass thin glass, too.
/r/MensRights25/06/10 09:21 PM
5

The end panel, to me, makes it seem as if it justifies the women's bias and taunting at the beginning.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 07:49 PM
4

The artist undoes the consciousness-raising done with the "I have a small penis" at the end.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 11:10 AM
9

"Gets it" only for as long as the lead-in to the punch-line.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 10:46 AM
4

This was not written about me. Change a few small facts and it could be my story.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 03:18 AM
5

Not if you take his (her?) comments from 16 minutes ago in response to shady8x into account.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:51 PM
7

Fuck you: Get married, have kids, have your wife throw you out and throw false allegations around at every turn. That's what you deserve.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:50 PM
5

And the records left for database builders to harvest and resell in perpetuity punish further.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:49 PM
9

More women than men are working; more men have been put out of work in this "recession" than women.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:47 PM
3

The only way it makes sense if you subscribe to the theory that they wish to punish Bad Dads.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:47 PM
3

You and me both, Brother. I spent the day trying to ignore the myriad reminders that it was FD.
/r/MensRights21/06/10 11:29 AM
3

Probably time to get another copy of Postal. Man, that was a fun game.
/r/MensRights18/06/10 08:22 PM
1

In some states, that may count as being married.
/r/MensRights18/06/10 03:43 AM
1

Yes, this is a half-serious question. I would bet that the teachers are men, so it's men training boys.
/r/MensRights15/06/10 08:55 PM
1

So they should be training girls, too, like the Palestinians?
/r/MensRights15/06/10 08:55 PM
4

Because Mother knows best.
/r/MensRights11/06/10 09:51 AM
5

We are legion.
/r/MensRights11/06/10 09:46 AM
1

Poor thing can't be held accountable for what she had done. She was probably being abused, so therefore she deserved it. Or it was her time of the month and she can't be held accountable for small bouts of temporary insanity.
/r/MensRights10/06/10 12:04 PM
1

Surely you know how you feel. It might be simple WGAF most of the time, especially given the trivialities we're expected to celebrate. But "hard to read" tends to make exes. It's called "flattening of affect". The precise boundary between the generally positive personality trait "serious" and the generally pathological "blunted affect" is impossible to describe precisely because it is culture specific and relies on subjective values. For example, the Japanese are often described as "unemotional"…
/r/MensRights09/06/10 09:16 AM
2

Sandals, t-shirt, and shorts.
/r/MensRights09/06/10 07:46 AM
2

You're Sparky. (Let me google that for you)[http://lmgtfy.com/?q=single-party+consent+38&l=1]
/r/MensRights06/06/10 03:21 AM
10

Not the greatest injustice, but a stupid act. Art my reflect culture, but culture also drives art. What would happen if violence against men (sexual and otherwise) were just as taboo in film as it is now against women?
/r/MensRights06/06/10 12:27 AM
1

Because Jimmy Carter and Congress wanted to give those Iranian "students" who invaded our embassy and took our people hostage what for.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 12:45 PM
-2

You're screwed unless the local prosecutor is making a point to prosecute women for such things. That said, finding a new job in this economy is difficult as fuck. Try being more slovenly in appearance?
/r/MensRights05/06/10 11:05 AM
18

if you record a phone conversation without consent it is illegal in all 50 states of the US Unless you're the government. if you record a phone conversation without consent it is illegal in all 50 states of the US Unless you live in a 1-party consent state like I do. I consent to me recording my calls. 38 states are single-party consent, Sparky.
/r/MensRights05/06/10 11:02 AM
1

After jail, an institution for the criminally insane.
/r/MensRights31/05/10 03:39 AM
1

But it won't stop there. Throwing people out of our country (after a possible jail term) who mutilate children will make sure it stops. If people are going to act in an uncivilized manner, they shouldn't get to enjoy the benefits of civilization. As we have it now, they're dragging us down to their level. We didn't used to have FGM - now we have FGM and are discussing how to perpetuate it, all in the name of "multiculturalism" and "inclusiveness".
/r/MensRights29/05/10 01:23 PM
1

Did you notice the big drop that happened when they added Fluoride to the water?
/r/MensRights28/05/10 09:45 PM
1

Absolutely true. But hey, US culture is all about making huge changes for very tiny benefits. Let's talk about accidental gun deaths. Shocking chart, isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/05/10 08:50 PM
3

Why are you arguing with me, we agree on the issue of circumcision? Why are you arguing with me, we agree on the issue of circumcision? Doctors (who like to make a little extra on the side) say that there is a "possible" (they used to say definite) health value to cutting infant boys' penises. I was simply pointing out the known benefits of castration. If you're going to step outside, you might as well take a walk around the block.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:40 PM
6

Decreased aggression Decreased roaming Increased concentration No testicular cancers Fewer hernias Fewer parianal tumors Fewer prostate problems
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:17 PM
5

There's a definite health benefit to getting castrated, but you don't see the doctors suggesting that anybody do it.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:02 PM
9

What, she was just going to cut his steak?
/r/MensRights20/05/10 03:13 PM
3

This was stopped under the Taliban In a pig's eye.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 02:27 AM
2

Ok, you need to make sure that your life is where you want it to go, not where she does. "Compromise is about what way the toilet paper goes." Never compromise your principles, your desires, or your dreams.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 09:30 PM
2

Ok, not crazily early. But still. Better to wait a couple more years, at least. Where is the upside in it for you? And if you weren't wanting to become a father before you met her, don't have kids.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 08:10 PM
3

How long have you known this girl?
/r/MensRights15/05/10 01:34 PM
2

The one with the lawyer who is a friend of the judge, or whom the judge likes, is the one that prevails. "10 years" is generally considered a "long term marriage" by statute, which means obligatory alimony, but it's ALL at the discretion of the judge.
/r/MensRights15/05/10 01:33 PM
1

An engineer, a mathematician, and a physicist are staying for the night in a hotel. Fortunately for this joke, a small fire breaks out in each room. The physicist awakes, sees the fire, makes some careful observations, and on the back of the hotel's wine list does some quick calculations. Grabbing the fire extinguisher, he puts out the fire with one, short, well placed burst, and then crawls back into bed and goes back to sleep. The engineer awakes, sees the fire, makes some careful observations…
/r/MensRights11/05/10 10:01 PM
1

Go to the book, look up her references, find out where the number came from. I'm a mathematician. This is a solved problem. In your profession, you'd throw out case title and give a general date, which may or may not be right.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 08:24 PM
1

In her "Uncoupling" book.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 03:37 PM
1

Also cited by Vaughan.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:55 PM
3

Lovely lady.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:25 PM
2

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:23 PM
-1

Because if you didn't, you'd have a hard time practicing. The laws may be "fair", but the judges certainly aren't.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:19 PM
1

Diane Vaughan cited the 66% figure and a 75% figure. Yes, these are the "eighties" figures - but you're saying that further studies have been done?
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:18 PM
1

Hey, the judge has a job. The lawyers have a job. Why can't you go out and get a job? Never mind that 20% of men in California are out of work.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:12 PM
1

They know exactly how much you make every paycheck - they get paid every time you do. The only privacy you truly have is what happens between your ears.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:11 PM
1

Downvotes for suggesting what Really Should Be Done? If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. Or are you ladies downvoting him not actually interested in equal rights?
/r/MensRights11/05/10 02:08 PM
1

Regrettably, I did not realize that 'fairness' performs no part within the legal systems view of divorce. Welcome to the club.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 11:26 AM
3

A Priest would just ask for the child's name, of course.
/r/MensRights08/05/10 08:20 PM
3

I know for a fact that therapists in California are required to report such things - so if she made her confession to one, she would be in the same boat. I'm fairly certain that it's the same across the rest of the county.
/r/MensRights08/05/10 08:19 PM
5

He's not talking about your friend. He's talking about the HR "Professionals", Wall Street, most MBAs, and the like. Especially the MBAs. Profit now, this quarter! Next year's results be damned.
/r/MensRights07/05/10 04:50 PM
8

And never sign until you've gotten that DNA confirmation.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 12:07 PM
1

“He allowed officers to examine his cell phone and his laptop computer,” the report said Fool. Never ever co-operate with the pigs.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 07:06 PM
2

De-friend her ass.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 04:14 PM
4

Aaaaand they'll let it slam you in the face.
/r/MensRights27/04/10 09:49 PM
3

Justice has been served.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 06:55 AM
3

they successfully lobbied for restrictions on prostitution [...] and the closing down of saloons where their husbands might mix freely with unattached young women. Now those are two very interesting points.
/r/MensRights15/04/10 01:46 PM
1

Of course they don't - you want all men to eschew the altar?
/r/MensRights14/04/10 09:14 PM
2

Yeah, it probably should have gone to /r/men
/r/MensRights14/04/10 09:12 PM
1

This is the funniest thing The Onion has published, ever. almost
/r/MensRights14/04/10 09:11 PM
5

Anne is a long-time MR advocate, actually.
/r/MensRights13/04/10 11:59 PM
6

It's SOP when things are going against the mother. Or if she's being especially vindictive.
/r/MensRights13/04/10 03:04 AM
1

It's saved off to read once I get home.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 05:31 PM
2

shock value to push her book sales From the excerpt I was able to read, it seems as if it's more like cold water thrown in your face rather than shock for shock value's sake. The folks who run MU say "Treat women with respect and you will be called a misogynist." also "Anyone who criticizes women is a misogynist."
/r/MensRights12/04/10 03:07 PM
1

Did you look at the site's page or are you just riffing on its title? I'm well-aware of the Hillary cartoons as I have friends who still insist on bashing Bill and Hillary.
/r/MensRights12/04/10 03:04 PM
1

Looking her up on the 'net led me to "Misogyny Unlimited".
/r/MensRights12/04/10 02:05 PM
2

What's the point in getting married in the first place, really? I assert that the people who are against "Gay Marriage" should be the ones promoting it first and foremost, as it would be quickly followed by "Gay Divorce" and that they would want the "faggots", especially, to be put through that kind of hell.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 06:15 PM
8

I wish I could contribute here.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 06:13 PM
4

Hasn't he heard? Only women get cancer. Only women die of cancer. (By extension, only men die of heart attacks.)
/r/MensRights09/04/10 06:12 PM
8

Police team rescues a man who was confined to a dingy room by his wife at their G’nagar house Proof that even the Indians think their names are ridiculously long.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 01:51 PM
3

Point being: People are influenced by their friends. People are influenced by advertising. Those who are twilight fans may not have started off wanting to feel tingly reading about a teenager, her sparkly vamp boyfriend, her wolfy boyfriend who's a pedophile, and her baby, but they get hooked once a friend influences them to take a taste. premium eunuch service facilities That man is a Eunuch. THAT man is a Eunuch. That man is dead.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 09:13 PM
2

"You should read Twilight, it's really steamy." No-one lives in a vacuum. We're all a product of our culture.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 05:42 PM
4

And emotional involvement is what constitutes "cheating" to women.
/r/MensRights02/04/10 05:41 PM
3

As the old punchline goes: "A real bastard is a guy who doesn't tell his girlfriend about his vasectomy until after she gets pregnant."
/r/MensRights02/04/10 01:07 PM
2

And if a wife gets paid when he leaves, how's that different?
/r/MensRights01/04/10 02:43 PM
2

Cyanide and Happiness is pretty much a Not Safe For Anyone webcomic.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 01:25 PM
-3

Not totally accurate, but damn close.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 10:03 AM
1

[I got the joke] Some moms plan on divorcing their husbands as soon as their kids turn 18. Other moms support them. Women complain about men a lot.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 12:27 AM
2

Oh no, I totally cherish every moment I spent with the Moms.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 10:17 PM
2

cf. Steve Martin's "If I had only one wish for Christmas" bit
/r/MensRights31/03/10 09:46 PM
1

You either pay up-front, in the middle, or at the end of the road. Any way you slice it, you're still gonna pay.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 09:45 PM
2

On the other hand, being the only dad at what's mostly a women's gathering is often very instructive after they've forgotten that you're there.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 06:38 PM
-3

There's nothing on there about five minutes of silence from the wife before she starts incessantly babbling about whatever.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 07:39 PM
1

<grunting> Sanfrancisco! <grunting> COCKSUCKER.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 07:06 PM
3

Tread lightly who lives in hope of pussy.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 05:44 PM
3

Find a copy of "Deadwood" and brush up on your cursing.
/r/MensRights29/03/10 02:12 PM
1

In other news: Sun rises daily in eastern sky.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:17 PM
1

Never.
/r/MensRights28/03/10 01:14 PM
2

Make the divorce as painless as possible Make sure that you live in the right state, in the right county, and end up in front of the right judge in divorce court.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:35 AM
4

Half of all marriages end in divorce. The other half end in death.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:33 AM
0

If she has them after you get yourself tutored, then mayhaps they're not really yours ... and she isn't either.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:32 AM
2

Problem being that most were quite manly in appearance before they made the change. There are exceptions, of course.
/r/MensRights27/03/10 02:30 AM
1

If Nannies are bad, what about daycare?
/r/MensRights26/03/10 01:11 PM
5

Monty Python's "Men..men..men..manly men" song is my new earworm.
/r/MensRights24/03/10 07:15 PM
4

I did not call you an idiot, but we can see that you're more than a bit obsessive. I did post something to the wrong spot then decided that I wasn't going to do your research for you. Note that the last graf you quoted starts off with "Battered women". Not "Battering women". Here's another academic paper for your reading pleasure. There's lots more out there. Step One: Find a researcher who didn't draw a conclusion before assembling data.
/r/MensRights20/03/10 03:02 PM
2

Who? (I first heard of her when the blow-up happened)
/r/MensRights20/03/10 02:45 PM
8

That's why women are more likely to use knives and weapons.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 09:02 PM
6

And you cut it off early. It starts small. It grows. (for either gender)
/r/MensRights19/03/10 08:33 PM
10

Women are more likely to murder in DV situations than men.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 08:26 PM
2

Don't they?
/r/MensRights19/03/10 08:08 PM
2

"Heads I win, Tails you lose."
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:12 PM
6

We do if you've been declared a bad dad.
/r/MensRights19/03/10 04:08 PM
-5

Do not anger woman. Especially an african-american one.
/r/MensRights18/03/10 05:51 PM
1

H O L Y C R A P What country/state was this in? Cohabitated?
/r/MensRights16/03/10 02:05 PM
4

In the USA, you don't even actually have to be the father. If BabyMomma names you, you're stuck until you can beat the rap. Never ever sign a birth certificate!
/r/MensRights15/03/10 12:37 AM
2

If I could have found a tall enough building with access to the roof, I would have done it. Used to be that height information used to be available on the net.
/r/MensRights14/03/10 12:18 AM
1

What part of "public" do you not understand? Are you saying that the photographer should not have taken this shot of this pair's intimate moment? Even though they were in the middle of Times Square?
/r/MensRights14/03/10 12:14 AM
1

Thank you. A more sane country than the USA for sure.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 10:25 PM
1

And now he needs to know exactly where the dividing line between public property and private property begins. Usually the sidewalk is public, but often the private part begins at an invisible line...
/r/MensRights11/03/10 03:11 PM
1

Where did your father do this? (Name of city, state, country)
/r/MensRights11/03/10 03:08 PM
3

There is no expectation of privacy in public places.
/r/MensRights11/03/10 03:04 PM
4

Sadly true.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 02:45 PM
6

What could it be, what could it be...
/r/MensRights10/03/10 02:44 PM
1

I read this and Alexyss K Tylor started speaking in my head.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 06:19 PM
2

Then she can shelter at Tempura House.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:23 PM
1

"Fucking for Abstinence"
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:23 PM
1

Pay a lawyer $2.5-5k and she'll never have to touch his penis again.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 03:21 PM
1

Oh, I'm dumped? NEXT!
/r/MensRights04/03/10 11:24 PM
2

Whoa. (Read all, must let it sink in)
/r/MensRights04/03/10 09:37 PM
1

Better that than being in an exclusive relationship with a psychotic woman. (e.g. Amy Steele)
/r/MensRights04/03/10 07:35 PM
2

I met a woman last night in a bar who is going through a bitter divorce. She was flirting up a storm on one hand, but said that she wasn't going to have sex until she was divorced because she's a Christian and to do otherwise would be a Sin. Then, later, she flashed her (newly enhanced) boob at her friend who was sitting across from me. Nice eyeful, interesting contrast. EDIT: Added her talking about being a Christian and Sin. EDIT: Moved: Her home state has a waiting period of a mere 30 days fo…
/r/MensRights04/03/10 06:37 PM
2

Sometimes you really do want a 2L bottle of Mountain Dew and a big bag of Cheetoes (crunchy!). Sometimes you really do need to have sex in order to break a negative mental cycle.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 06:34 PM
2

You can see it here. Men who haven't done the math (sex partners per year * years of singledom) thinking that a woman who has had more than five to ten partners is some kind of disease-ridden whore. (While they themselves are wanting to score as much as possible)
/r/MensRights04/03/10 06:33 PM
2

He's fucked.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 02:05 PM
1

Tortured. Great sex can be had for a price, but the flip side? Hard to get that.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 08:11 PM
3

Somebody has to pay.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 08:09 PM
5

He pays half of that in taxes, right off the top.
/r/MensRights03/03/10 01:31 PM
6

Scholarly paper explaining the "economic hardship" of divorce. (I know there are more - from what I remember, the academic consensus is that divorce means short-term hardship for both partners (lawyer bills! job/spending problems from being emotionally unsound) and that the women end up coming out on top after ?five? years) In medieval times, people who couldn't afford to have children ended up with the children dying of malnutrition and such. If you're married and fall on hard times, everyone s…
/r/MensRights03/03/10 01:30 PM
2

It's a humor website, like The Onion.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 03:19 PM
3

Psychological damage will do that, too.
/r/MensRights02/03/10 02:38 AM
8

You called?
/r/MensRights22/02/10 11:43 PM
4

God must love prudes - he made so many of them.
/r/MensRights21/02/10 05:27 PM
36

No, not new. It's a common tactic used by the wife in divorce cases.
/r/MensRights19/02/10 02:38 PM
1

A huge thread over in WTF-land and it's front-page on the regular reddit.
/r/MensRights17/02/10 01:20 AM
1

But should his financial fortunes change for the worse such that he can't pay the outrageous amount of support he undoubtably would have to, her lawyers will argue that he's just fucking off and that he should go back to doing exactly what he was doing. Should his fortunes change for the better, she'll come back to the pot and demand even more.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 02:14 PM
2

Yes, married men (or those with people in their lives - don't have to be married!) live longer. I know this and I'll still make that joke every time. Married women apparently have shorter lives than their single counterparts now, at least according to the web's zeitgeist.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 02:46 PM
2

"But Doc, what's the point of living to 100 if I can't drink, can't smoke, and can't chase girls?"
/r/MensRights12/02/10 11:00 PM
2

No, it only seems that way.
/r/MensRights12/02/10 10:59 PM
2

HER own kid.
/r/MensRights10/02/10 02:35 AM
5

Obviously not.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 03:00 AM
5

I keep clicking the upvote but the points only go up and down by one. FUCK
/r/MensRights09/02/10 03:00 AM
2

Of course we do! Having a penis or caring about the plight of men makes you evil or a traitor to your sex.
/r/MensRights09/02/10 02:59 AM
1

Because Men Are Bad. That's why it's acceptable to hit men and treat them poorly in general.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 06:27 PM
3

You never really know someone until you get divorced from them.
/r/MensRights06/02/10 09:01 PM
3

Same goes for "Heads I win, tails you lose."
/r/MensRights02/02/10 01:56 PM
2

Young to middle-aged men, one perhaps nearing retirement age.
/r/MensRights29/01/10 12:37 AM
1

You speak sooth, my brother.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 08:53 PM
1

The show actually isn't that good. All the singing is studio work and highly processed - the actors do their own singing, or so they say. It's teen-age drama with song and dance numbers. A friend calls it "dark" but I don't find it so. Then again, I watch black humour that she can't stand.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 03:09 AM
1

Hulu. Which won't work if you don't come from an American IP address.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:43 PM
2

It was horrifying to sit and listen to my wife loudly talk to her friends about how they (her friends) were going to divorce their children's fathers once they reached 18.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:42 PM
1

Oh, you dated my first wife, too?
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:40 PM
3

And thus he reveals that he's not quite as reformed as he thought.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:38 PM
0

Stereotypes exist because humans can not deal with all the data we're given - thus, we learn that when we hear a tiger growl that we'd better make sure that it's either far away or we are in a defensible position. Groups of humans communicate what they've learned and thus stereotypes are born. Sure, not all tigers are going to attack when you hear them growl, but it's best to be on the alert when you hear one.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:37 PM
1

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:34 PM
-1

If God existed, people like that would not exist.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:33 PM
2

Let me quote my favorite judge, who declared in court: "I don't believe in Parental Alienation Syndrome." I am not making this up.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:31 PM
2

At 5'10", you're very tall. You're above the 95th percentile. I think that the Tall Clubs require someone to be in the 99th percentile for their gender.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:29 PM
4

object = touch(lid); case object in: tank_lid: open(lid); break; lid: break; seat: lower(seat); break; evacuate(); It's not that damn hard.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:14 PM
1

That's called "having a fetish", in the original psychological sense. A pre-condition that must be present in order to reach sexual satisfaction.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 05:07 PM
1

Googling about, I see that in Pennsylvania, for example, she should have gotten at least nine months: Often, involuntary manslaughter is charged in these types of cases, but Pennsylvania Sentencing Guidelines would call for a minimum sentence of from nine to 16 months. While Federal Sentencing Guidelines for involuntary manslaughter might be greater, such a charge does not warrant a longer sentence under Pennsylvania law. Here's the Ohio statute in question. Given that she committed at least a m…
/r/MensRights25/01/10 03:24 PM
1

I'm sure the answer would be "I was in love."
/r/MensRights25/01/10 02:56 PM
1

Thank you very much, Sonny.
/r/MensRights25/01/10 02:56 PM
6

Stuart on page four is a bloody idiot, having married that crazy bitch knowing she was insane. No pussy is that good.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 06:16 PM
2

Brother, you are well and truly fucked. There's nothing you can do now except to (a) cause her to miscarry [which yes could carry a DV jail term with it] or (b) up and disappear. If she can't find you, she might have an abortion. NEVER sign the birth certificate. There might be some hope that her husband may be on the hook for the baby. Might. Highly doubtful. If she can afford a better mouthpiece than you, then you are well and truly fucked.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 05:59 PM
1

I'd thought that sort of monkeyshines had gone out in the early oughties. Kids! Light background, dark type. Dark background, light type. NEVER put dark on dark (blue on black with small fonts was a favorite in the nineties) or light on light. Better still, don't set the colors on your page. We know how we like it.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 05:53 PM
2

Yes, of course I have. It used to be all that people had, hence it forms a basis for being "married" in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 05:22 PM
2

It depends on who has more money to throw away litigating against it. Or whose lawyer is a friend with the judge. Or who the judge hates more. In the end, a pre-nup really isn't worth the paper it's written on. Don't get married. Don't have children. Never EVER sign the birth-certificate, even if you are sure it's yours. As the wise man once said: "If it flies, floats, or fucks, it's cheaper to rent."
/r/MensRights09/01/10 07:01 PM
2

It's called "Prostitution", son. Women are weak and helpless and would never ever physically or emotionally or sexually abuse anyone, much less their husbands or their children. They would never lie to the police. They would never lie to the court. They would never lie to you. Women are special flowers who deserve our protection. Which means money. You are a walking wallet.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:49 PM
2

No wonder people say OKCupid is for losers.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:38 PM
2

Then the wife gets free money from the goverment - his social security, and likely his retirement bucks - for life.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:22 PM
3

Women murder men just fine - in fact, they know they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter