TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BitterSedditer Archive

View 10 posts and 158 comments by BitterSedditer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

But it is still a reflection of desires. Women may not want to be kidnapped and raped repeatedly by a tough, brutal Alpha male. But it still shows they want dominanting sex from dominating men. Women fantasize about expensive weddings because they want a magnificent wedding. Men fantasize about revenge because they're bitter. They all reflect reality, but bloopers will make you refuse making assumptions on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 10:10 PM
2

It varies from man to man. Almost every man loves blowjobs. Most love getting anal once in awhile. And many love some aspect of bdsm, ranging from spanking, bondage, to rape roleplay. Give these to you man, and you will make him 500 times more satysfied than a 100 "I love yous". Unfortunately, many men have grown beta, and believe that any demands for sexual fulfillment in their relationship as "abusive" and "misogynistic".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:45 PM
2

Fantasy is a reflection of desire. They say tons about what humans want. If women wanted equal relationships, they'd write about how Beta Bob took care of her after she was assaulted. Instead, they write about an Alpha assaulting her and making her into a submissive fucktoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:35 PM
2

If you want to be very attractive to a man, then yes. You don't need to be his sex slave 24/7, but the more you sexually fulfill your SO, the more he will by satisfied in a relationship. A good sex act to a man is just as important to a man as a fine date, gift, or backrub for a woman. And many women pretend that this isn't really an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:32 PM
2

Ah yes, the extreme, taboo, demanding fantasy of having a decent blowjob. But if you don't regularly give cunnilingus with nothing in return, then you're more misogynistic than r/TheRedPill, 4chan, and the Republican party combined.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:57 PM
1

The difference is that men are always the one who must lead in the bedroom. They must fulfill their wives fantasies, and not their own. Its why you constantly hear about husbands and boyfriends complaining about their GFs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:44 PM
1

Holy female soliphism Batman! That statement wasn't about you. Most already know women love attention during sex, as they are complete sexual narcissists. But men don't like this. Men want their sexual needs met, and their fantasies don't involve 5 years of foreplay for missionary position sex. If you really want to fulfil a man's romantic needs, you need to be screwing them like crazy. Instead, most men have to pray to God, Yahweh, Allah, Vishnu, Ahura Mazda, and Superman just to get a finished…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:36 PM
2

This is really using corner case scenarios to make vast assumptions that only lead to more suffering for both genders. Sure, there are male subs and even a few female dommes. But a kind, sweet, supplicating beta will never be as universally attractive as a tall, muscular, square-jaw asshole Alpha who makes six figures.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:13 PM
0

Men are, and always will be, the productive, creative sex. No amount of feminism will change this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 01:44 AM
1

But we're not insects, tigers, or hyenas. We're apes. And look at our closes ancestors, Chimpanzees, still have a mating hierachy, tipping off at the Alpha Male.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 01:39 AM
3

Yeah, its easy, beta losers! That's why PUA classes cost hundreds or thousands. All you need to do is be yourself, even though it has NEVER worked before! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 01:05 AM
4

Its not about getting the girl here. Its about avoiding sluts entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:12 AM
3

And those 20% go for the top 20% of males. And your proof elsewise? If getting laid was sooooo eaaaaasy, why are there so many average frustrated chumps? If it were easy, even possible, for the average guy, r/TheRedPill wouldn't exsist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:10 AM
3

It shows the reality of male-female dynamics. I have never seen evidence to counteract these studies. And it is reflected in reality, given the number of Average Frustrated Chumps.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 12:08 AM
4

Only 20% have CASUAL sex. The rest has to be in a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 11:40 PM
7

Both OkCupid and Tinder studies show that only 20% of men are deemed as at least attractive. And thus, most men will never get offers of casual sex in their lifetime. Don't blame me, blame biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:36 PM
5

Yes. I, and many other men, have realized that as women's are given more and more advantages, men have gotten no gains socially, only losing. And thus I don't see any reason why I shouldn't warn other men about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:34 PM
4

Sorry man, but someone has to break to you. "I want an asian midget to go down on me and go AIEAIEAIEAIEAIE!" -Said no woman ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:33 PM
1

Your best solution is a .44 magnum.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:25 PM
10

We assumed that because sex would be more acceptable, we would get more sex. Instead what happened is that the bottom 80% saw nothing, while the top 20% are laughing their asses off. It was of course, a great mistake on our part. And if you told any guy this truth, they'd never support sex positivity in a million years...unless they were already a top 20%er.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:23 PM
3

Then why the fuck would I support it when there's literally no benefit to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:02 PM
1

Lulz, women were never going to stop in the first place. Its 2015 and "Male Tears" is still an acceptable joke. So if that's fine, then yes, slut shaming is perfectly acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 10:02 PM
-3

Unfortunately, I'm far from the top 20% of males. But the top 20% should love sluts. Just not ltr them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 09:31 PM
-1

That's what I said man. Its just women don't particularly give a shit. Dat reading comprehension...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 09:29 PM
1

sluts don't exsist http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/12753/hamster-wheel-o-s.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 09:07 PM
6

Studs aren't particularly beneficial to society. But I'm not looking to benefit society. I'm looking to benefit myself. And being a player is actually insanely attractive to women. Just look at the thousands of romance novels where the "hero" is slaying pussy until he finds THE ONE.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:20 PM
22

Pretty much this. We aren't calling for sluts to be sent to the gas chambers. But if not wanting to LTR one is considered "shaming", then I have no issue with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 08:18 PM
2

Because its worldwide and has high price due to being illegal. Only a small fraction of men are into children. However, studies have shown many, if not most women, enjoy the thought of being raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:08 PM
1

We don't know if they think she's innocent or not. Fritzl is undeniable guilty. yet he will still be more popular than all of the Endorsed Contributers combined.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:07 PM
1

If men didn't want a harem, porn wouldn't exsist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:05 PM
2

Pablo Escabar is kinda in the top 1% of the top 1% of criminals. But yes, these men are very appealing. While men are trying to get billionaires who cheated the system in jail, women are blowing their brains off to their hedonism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:04 PM
3

Rape fantasies sell much more than child porn. Christian Grey, which feminists call a "rapist", was the star of a 500+ million dollar grossing movie. And women have been geting ravaged by musuclar alphas since The Flame and the Flower.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:03 PM
0

They can't if the cops come along, or if they're behind bars. Criminals often lack wealth or status to influence people. They're seen as losers by the upper class.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:59 PM
-1

Have you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:58 PM
2

Its still a reality he wishes, and is probably frustrated he can't get it. That is Special Snowflake Syndrome. Most women in fact, love to be dominanted, and most love thinking about being raped by a high-value man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:54 PM
2

https://www.goodreads.com/shelf/show/dark-romance Actually, women jill off all the time do cold and abusive men. Its part of their Biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:53 PM
1

Personal experience and asking fisherman who've spent a lot of time with fish. I don't give a shit about how much money you make. I care about your appearance, but not to your status. I can't stick my dick in your Ph. D. It is a need that, isn't required, but will reduce your life prospects if unfullfilled. Again, there is a reason why its at the base.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:51 PM
1

Most of those letters are trying to state her innocence. They don't actually think she's a killer.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:48 PM
2

We've been told this throughout our lives. But guess who has most success with women? Is it Beta NiceGuy? Or Chad McTreatsHerLikeShit?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:42 PM
2

Bill Clinton, Joseph Fritzl, highschool jocks...power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, man. Women go crazy for it. Just not betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:41 PM
2

If it didn't require insane looks, status, game, and effort. Its difficult to maintain a harem of women without it crashing. That is debateable. At the very least, it shows that pretty much all women want, in fact, even NEED, to be dominanted and degraded.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:39 PM
1

Yeah, they want $$$ too.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:37 PM
1

Nah, they get plenty of willing pussy. Its the bad boy appeal. Joseph Fritzl, child rapist and pervert, has received hundreds of love letters. The only thing preventing him from banging those chicks is his iron cell. Despite what r/TheRedPill may endorse, this man is more alpha than a score of macho body builders.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:37 PM
2

Ex-cons score like crazy man. But while dominant in their own way, they usually have little social dominance, the real reason they're unattractive, not that they can't love her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:34 PM
3

Of course it tells you how. Men have been emphazing how useful dominance is in dating for years. This just adds prove to it. Those questions are easy. Women like gay men for similar reasons men like lesbians. And they're still usually in dominant/submissive roles. And r/trp never questions that submissive beta men exsist. But those men will always fail in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:32 PM
0

There's a certain level of nuance people won't get because they're so busy trying to be offended to be right.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:28 PM
1

They dream of marrying their boyfriends for their income and validation, not because of the sex with them. I should have been more specific. Hypergamy is about status. Men are polygamous. We don't care if a girl with big tits is the president of the free world or a Hooter's waitress. Sex comes at the bottom of our hierachy of needs, along with shelter and food. Of course we put it above other needs like self-actualization.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:26 PM
2

There's nothing to respond to. Its the equivalent of saying "2+2 = 5" and denying any evidence towards the contrary. Fantasies ARE a wish of reality. Example - Men have fantasies of ruling a harem of women. And guess what? ALL men would have one if they could get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:23 PM
3

Actually, men who rape and beat women get laid all the time. Criminals are actually more likely than the average population to get laid. Women love trying to fix a "bad boy" who high fives his bros behind her back. And if you think women "hate" being beaten, just look at the success of Chris Brown among the ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:19 PM
2

That is love in a platonic sense. Romantic? You better be in her top 20% of men, or else you are invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:18 PM
9

HAHAHA! There are almost zero submissive men in romance novels. What a joke. Yeah, a movie makes 500 million dollars off of curiosity alone. Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:17 PM
3

However, women would rather be dominanted than loved. Perhaps that would have been a better title, as people are not understanding the nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:16 PM
3

That is an epic level of hamstering.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:15 PM
-3

Dominance is WAY more important. Stressing the importance of love is fucking over new generations of boys and men, including men. Women would much rather tolerate a man who can dominate her, but doesn't love her, than a man who loves her, but can't dominate her.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:14 PM
2

Fantasies are a reflection of reality. If they wanted an equal relationship, they would be dreaming of marrying Beta Bob. Instead, they jill off to square-jawed Chad McTreatsHerLikeShit, CEO of a Fortune 500 company.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:10 PM
1

Fantasies are a reflection of reality. If they wanted an equal relationship, they would be dreaming of marrying Beta Bob. Instead, they jill off to square-jawed Chad McTreatsHerLikeShit, CEO of a Fortune 500 company. All men want as much sex with as many women as possible. Its a universal status symbol. Any man who says otherwise is either a liar or a cuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:09 PM
3

That only works BECAUSE he's dominant. Between choosing a nice guy who did all those things, and a man whore who pumps and dumps her on his private jet, women will always choose the latter unless they're approaching the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:04 PM
8

And yet millions upon millions of women have bought it. They eat that shit up. But we can't make any assumptions on it? And of course women have a high affinity for gay men. You've never heard of a gay guy complain about fag hags?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:03 PM
1

A woman would rather be dominanted by an alpha than touched by a beta, so saying women want to be "loved" is patentedly misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 07:02 PM
7

"Equal dominant" Divided by zero error!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 01:58 AM
5

Biology. Female erotica. Field reports from successful fisherman. Reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 01:57 AM
4

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/6218-everything-in-the-world-is-about-sex-except-sex-sex
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:16 AM
43

The level of solipsism here is off the charts! "The world is just. These men aren't having success with women. Therefore, they MUST be unattractive, rude, misogynistic, neckbeards, and Nazi scum." wrong. We were just taught by feminism that women love respect. In reality, they crave dominance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 02:05 AM
1

Says the person throwing a tantrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:36 AM
0

If it acts like a duck, thinks like a duck, and talks like a duck, then its a goose you misogynistic shitlord! This is just an epic level of gerbiling because you cannot rationalize a fundamnetal rp truth. Women ARE children. Not like children. ARE. But you are arguing until you are blue in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:31 AM
1

And after you save them, are you going to rescue a distressed damsel complaining about the unwanted attention she gets from online gamers? You're so blue, you probably think Dread game is a form of abuse. Disgusting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:22 AM
1

As the mental equals to adult women, they should be just as responsible, the most responsible teenager in the household. This also proves that, like actual children, women should not be allowed to vote or drive. If anything, we should be emulating the Middle East. Remember, anytime a woman enters the ballot box, it is no different than if Hannah Monanta was going to offer her opinion on saving the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:20 AM
1

And what does that have to do with the discussion? They can still have sex. And since they are as responsible as adult women, there should be no issue here other than personal morals. But r/TheRedPill is, at its core, amoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:11 AM
1

This has no relevance to my statement. If women are 12 year olds, in 25 year old bodies, and we are allowed to fuck 25 year olds, I see no reason why we shouldn't be allowed to fuck 12 year olds. And one of the core RP tenants is that "Women are children."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 01:03 AM
1

That is irrelevant to this discussion. The human body is constantly developing, growing well into middle age. And besides, there is no magic age for ending development. Show me the citation where the body magically stops developing at 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 12:56 AM
0

Nothing about my post is incorrect as long as we agree that women stop maturing at around 11-12.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 12:27 AM
1

Women are vapid, selfish creatures. They're heavily in need of social proof, and are complete whores for validation. They're adult children. This is why, despite decades of feminism, women are still outshown by men in all fields, including science, business, and art/writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 10:48 PM
4

That's because there is literally no alternative to r/theredpill. r/thebluepill can only mock r/theredpill because, as mostly women, they are not rational enough to tell what they are attracted too. They would rather mock imaginary "neckbeards" then actually stop "misogyny" If r/punchingmorpheus actually worked, it wouldn't be a ghost town. Don't listen to these bloopers. Follow the sidebar. Lift. Don't rely on women. Best decisions of my LIFE.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 10:34 PM
-1

A. Men shouldn't be rapists. There are laws against that. B. How are they not? When you're getting the shit about you, do you suddenly cum despite not enjoying it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 08:09 AM
0

If they aren't at least enjoying a part of the experience, then why are they cumming their brains out?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:41 AM
0

Those are especially unusual circumstance. Nothing significant is happening during rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:40 AM
0

That only involves physical arousal. They do not get sexual arousal from pain alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:24 AM
0

I'm not saying anything about rape. All I'm saying is that women often find it pleasureable, and thus it isn't as bad as female make it out to be. Its the definition of attention whoring.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 07:21 AM
-1

That is an extreme example. Nobody's spine is getting touched here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:55 AM
0

That's twice as much as regular sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:54 AM
0

That's the absolute low end though. On the absolute high end, women are complete sluts for dominant men. Regardless of the inbetween, it provides evidence for redpill theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:45 AM
0

It is still a massive number for the worst event imaginable for a women (allegedly). You don't see 5-50% of Jews blowing their loads when they're sent to the gas chambers, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:32 AM
-1

Mental arousal = what women say Genital arousal = reality When the two differ, go with biology. Women's bodies know them better than themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:24 AM
-1

You are contradicting yourself. If he wasn't enjoying the experience, he wasn't going to cum. You make it sound like men have raging erections from something as soft as a physical checkup. In reality, and sexually unaroused man will remain flaccid.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:23 AM
-1

As soon as you are talking about women saying what they're attracted to, you have drunken the Kool-Aide. This is like believing women want "nice, respecful guys" because she says so, when she dates the jock hockey player who doesn't message her for a week and jills off to three jacked men "raping" her in a "dark romance'. And nobody likes tickling. Everyone likes orgasms.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:12 AM
0

Just because they disagree with your BluePilled opinion doesn't mean they're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:09 AM
-2

If she didn't enjoy being raped, she wouldn't have cum. Its as simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 06:06 AM
-2

That's because of sociology. We're told that rape is bad, and that no women could ever love being absolutely dominated. Clearly, this isn't the case. And yes, many men enjoy being dominated too. They're not the best with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:59 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/comments/193e3x https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/200903/the-most-important-sexual-statistic
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:57 AM
-2

r/TheRedPill is amoral. It does not support or not support actions. It just gives you the information the reflects the truth of the world so that men can better themselves. This shows that dominance is so sexy, it can be just as arousing, if not more, than vanilla sex. I'm not suggesting men should legitimately rape women, but be dominant in bed. It also shows that the negative reaction to rape is largely overemphasized.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:55 AM
-4

Nobody is comfortable that their sweet, feminine angel actually enjoys rape, especially the angel herself. That's why there is a massive hamster rationalization train going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:44 AM
0

The difference is that wearing a short skirt does not mean wanting access to sex with everyone. Orgasming indicates sex was pleasureable. People don't orgasm unless they're fucking aroused.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:42 AM
-4

If he cums, he's obviously enjoying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:40 AM
0

Dominance is like forcing viagra down a woman's throat then? Then this confirms TRP theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 05:37 AM
1

And your point being? And yes, it does. By its very nature, a leader is superior to the follower. There's a reason why most people can name the presidents, but couldn't give two shits about the vices. The myth of the equal relationship is one of the most disasterous things you can tell to an unmasculine beta male.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:13 PM
1

You don't show a news article of waves of men flocking together to see Crazy McGee.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 11:06 PM
1

Watch how women act, not what they say. And its not even niceness they are talking about. Its complete dominance and superiority. I.E. - Treat her like a lesser human being. Without this, they don't give a shit about how nice you are. Niceness may help in an LTR, but without attraction, will NEVER get you laid, and probably never a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:54 PM
1

citation needed On that merit, how many women do you know have abusive, asshole exs, hmm?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:48 PM
1

Actually, it can be, with the likes of serial killers, players, and abusers. These are all aspects women have reacted to positively in these men. And regardless, not a single of there Alpha+++s are known for their kindness. Nobody has been successful sexually because they were a good person. That's why Nice Guys fail, not because they were not actually nice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:47 PM
3

r/TheBluePill CONSTANTLY rails that "Nice Guys" aren't genuinely nice, that they are only so to get laid. This is the exact scenario you're describing, but with a Chad. Yet suddenly, Chad is an angel for manipulating women? I agree that some niceness for an LTR can work...but it is far from required, and you already need to establish that you're an asshole/masculine jock, as seen in the above example. Therefore, being an actual nice guy is pretty worthless towards getting women. Even being a fak…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:43 PM
2

Big Red? Is that you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:37 PM
2

However, niceness if far more important for men than for women. Settling for complete bitches is usually the last resort of the thirsty. Women flock to assholes willingly, even when they have options.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:37 PM
2

I think that men who are rewarded by society the most should be looked to as role models, irregardless of their questionable morals. I would have no problem if we built a giant bronze Chris Brown statue beating up a giant bronze Rhianna statue. I don't think men should settle for being the good, safe option when women are pining for Mr. TreatsHerLikeShit. There is a limit to everything, but this shows the power of dominance and social status trumping any hope niceness has at matching them. Not a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:35 PM
1

Of course, the real question is why should you be offering her your commitment when she's banging Chads who disrespect her with no cost to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:27 PM
0

No. Both kinds of niceness are the leading cause of vaginal dryness. Most men don't bend themselves backwards for women. Yet even an acceptable amount of respect isn't as successful as being an aloof, stoice alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:26 PM
1

That still shows niceness does not help attractiveness. Being an asshole might damage it, but never as much as treating a woman like an equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:25 PM
1

There's a reason why this never happens in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 10:18 PM
-1

But whatever you do, don't be nice to everyone. I.E. - An actual nice guy. Be only nice to her - I.E. - A fake nice guy. Talk about blowing feminists lids on that one! They've been getting things reversed this entire time!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:14 PM
3

Men hit on everyone. The reason why we may seem to tolerate assholes is because we NEED to. The dating game is so rigged, we'll work with whoever we get. Women, given the choice, will not only choose a hot asshole, but will usually choice an average asshole over a nice guy instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:08 PM
1

Name one area where women aren't worse than men other than child rearing (and even that is debatable). There is a reason why r/TheRedPill comes off as anti-woman. They don't accomplish much. Civilization would be nothing without muscular men pulling blocks of concrete to build our wonders, or nerds spending years of building the computers of tomorrow. Without women? We'd lose Buzzfeed I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:53 PM
3

They're not with him because he's "nice". they're with him because he is the most high status man they could ever hope to snag. The difference is, men want a woman who is attractive AND nice. Women want a man who is attractive and DOMINANT. Niceness is completely optional, especially for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:49 PM
5

The prime difference is that we'd ideally go for a woman who is both attractive AND nice. And no, Chad isn't nice when he's nice to you, but shoves poindexter to the ground and breaks his TI-83. Women lean towards attractive BUT NOT nice. Yet, whenever this is brought up, feminists will do their best to paint "neckbeards" (because bad personality = must be ugly, right?) as a monsterous mixture between Eliot Rodger, Adolf Hitler, and Jared Fogles.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:43 PM
4

Yeah, the guy who sings about banging/not trusting women really is a SWEET ANGEL inside who needs to be fixed. Another image of Chris Brown being "nice": http://goldenboyrecords.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/RIHANNA-BEATEN.jpg But your TL;Dr agrees with my general point - if men want to get laid, the last thing on the planet they should focus on is treating her like an equal human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:37 PM
2

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/cellar-monster-josef-fritzl-receives-hundreds-of-love-letters-6851149.html Looks aren't as important with women...as long as you are an asshole among assholes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:11 PM
5

Again, niceness it at least the 2nd thing men most desire in our relationships. For women, its the 28th. Chad Thundercock doesn't struggle to get a girlfriend. He just doesn't want one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:04 PM
8

Nah. r/TheBluePill would rather mock people than actually change the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:02 PM
1

Oh cool. Watered-down RedePill. I needed this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:39 PM
1

By watching what women do and asking fisherman how to catch fish. And it turns out, despite what feminism tells you, women LOVE raw, throbbing, misogynistic masculinity, as well as high status.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:02 PM
1

citation needed None. Because no woman has ever expressed interest. Because no attractive teenage/early 20s woman wants to be with a Beta male at this point in their life. Feminists only mock such men, so I might as well pick up on tricks from PUA,
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:57 PM
1

Why be the supplicating beta when you can be the player? God, you sound you still want to ride his Alpha cawk.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:27 PM
2

AHAHAHAHA! Sounds like a lovely relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:27 PM
1

That's mostly true....except for the top 20% of men. Those guys fucking SCORE!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:25 PM
2

Are you kidding!? People fail to get ANYTHING on Tinder ALL of the time. And regardless, it proves that dating in inherently unequal, and the notion of men and women being so is a hilarious joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:24 PM
2

As a gamer, I'd say I've never seen it. You're probably making assumptions just because of uggos. Yes she still gives it away to Chad to keep him. The average man gets nothing sexually from an LTR that Chad doesn't, and easier. You say you have better sex, but you still don't say what Beta Bob gets that Chad doesn't. The knowledge that the relationship is "healthy and happy" doesn't get my dick hard.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:20 PM
2

How is my statement racist, outside of dropping THE N BOMB ?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:58 AM
5

Yes it is. Its something many people desire, but can't achieve due to low SMV, at least casually. If women aren't only focusing on the cream of the crop, why do they rate most men as unattractive? Why is Tinder a wasteland for the average gentleman?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:53 AM
3

Men are the biologically superior sex. As Patrice O'Neal once said, the woman of any species is the bitch version of the male. No wonder so many female Chinese babies were killed. Could you imagine raising someone whose biological destiny was to be FUCKED by someone who was better than her in every single way, shape, and form?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:30 AM
–

I apologize if Joe Niggerdick is politically incorrect. But I admire the blacks who have enough game to realize their full potential. I just don't want the sluts who land on his dick. Nobody claims that women are entitled to serve betas. We just point out that they have no interest in them sexually. The malicious "Nice Guy" is a feminist myth. In reality, he's always a genuinely nice, awkward, chubby nerd who, in a moment of frustration, condemns the system where women are far more interested in…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 05:05 AM
6

Gotta love how r/thebluepill is outright admitting girls are fucking Chads while leaving betas thirsty. In reality, she wants more of Chad. He just won't commit because he has options. She's with a beta because her biological clock is ticking, and she needs to find her provider. And no, I don't give a shit about her personality and ability to raise kids if I'm not getting her best sex. And I'm not getting her best sex when she's wasting her teens and 20s on some douchebro who only fucks her so h…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 04:12 AM
2

Bah! Either one in a million or a master of game.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:10 AM
2

Of course. That's why r/TheRedPill must be kept away from the public eye. Its the only place where men can vent their frustrations without being labeled as worse than Hitler. Women want natural Alphas, not men who are baffled by the game. Women do give it away without intimacy or anything special - but not to the average joe. They give it to Chad Thundercock, Joe Niggerdick, or Brad McChadPitt. After she has given it away for free, unless she gives it to you away for free and even more, she has …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 03:04 AM
2

One in a Million or more Alpha than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:59 AM
2

That's Super Special Snowflake Syndrome. In reality, we have evidence that women only find 20% of men attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:43 AM
2

Then why do non-alpha men completely fail on Tinder?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:36 AM
2

The CDC stats tell about when men have sex. It doesn't speak of casual sex. If you want casual sex, you need an Alpha type of personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 02:04 AM
2

If the average man were doing well, then they would be doing great on Tinder. Instead, only the highest of value of men get anything out of it. Their only chance is to either become more alpha or enter an LTR. We also are not the only, nor first, ones to notice the Alpha vs Beta dynamics. See: Romance novels. Illness for a short-term is alright. For the long-term, I would not blame him for leaving the relationship. And if you decided to not fuck him for weeks, even months on end (See r/deadbedro…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:53 AM
3

Most men have tried. There are countless stories of betas being beta and it biting them on the ass, or men who could never, ever attract women because they didn't have a masculine bone in their body. Again, we did not make up the game. You're arguing with reality. r/TheRedPill doesn't control whenever the game exists or not. It just does. If said relationship was built around sex. The fact you still do not understand that sex is vital in a relationship and that it leaving the relationship is eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:43 AM
1

What do you weigh?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:29 AM
4

Because men still have causal sex with women below the top 20%. As Tinder has shown, women don't. Women don't settle until they "settle down" with a Beta provider.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:29 AM
2

That's where dominance comes in. Also, not everyone can be adventurous and fit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:27 AM
2

Quite contrare. Many redpillers have wanted to have solid, meaninful relationships. But we realized our SOs were too busy riding the cock carousel. So we joined the game. Yes, it is. A relationship can survive without shared interests, emotional intimacy, etc. As soon as the sex ends, the relationship is over. It is less than a friendship. Nothing can overcome this. Her personality can't suck my dick. But that's not how life works. You need to understand that you may not be your future partners …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:26 AM
2

Again, they could be LTRs. Beta men can get LTRs. But the lack of attraction often kills them off. See r/deadbedrooms
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:16 AM
2

Close, but not quite. The hot MEN get ALL the attention. Hot girls get more attention, but we are willing to settle when it comes to casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 01:15 AM
1

Never said it was. Don't hate the player, hate the game. Still, if the sex ever disappears, the relationship doesn't exsist anymore. It is still more important than women will ever understand. Again, if she is willing to give sex to an Alpha, but make a beta "wait for the right moment", she is restraining the best thing she could give to a relationship. I would not enter a relationship under any circumstances if my needs were not met sexually and if I wasn't her best lay ever. I have. Sadly, bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 12:14 AM
4

We don't know whenever or not these men are alpha or beta or whenever or not these women were in a relationship or casual flings. Therefore, nothing can be said about these situations. However, we DO know that men on Tinder who aren't on top 20% WILL fail getting casual sex, or at least beat their ASS getting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/15 12:09 AM
3

Of course. Men base much of their love on sex. By giving way her sex to an alpha, while witholding it from a beta, until he provides commitment, she's establishing that "Yes, you're not as desirable as Chad. I'd probably still fuck him if he wanted to settle down. But I choooooose yooooooou." I'd place value on human qualities if women did. But being a good person has nothing to do with sexual success. Sex is the most important thing for a guy in a relationship. Without that, she's just a friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:43 PM
2

I'd think so, personally. But I can't speak for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:36 PM
3

Again, if women had sex with non-alphas, why is the average dude failing spectacularly at Tinder, but the former football player wearing a wife beater slays pussy every time he logs on?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:29 PM
3

Generally, women love snagging a player. I wouldn't recoomend it, but hey, I'm not a woman. Women care more about emotional intimacy than sex when it comes to cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:27 PM
2

Alpha: -Dominant -Aggressive -Doesn't really give a shit about things -Teasing Beta: -Submissive -Kind (Not just in the "Nice Guy" way, a feminist myth that ever r/TheRedPill has swallowed) -Respectful -Boring Yes, being an asshole will get you more success than being a geniune good guy. Yet she gives him the one thing that's she value in: her sex, for free. A beta has to beat his ass for the same thing, and its eventually going to drop off. That's his reward? What a fucking joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:26 PM
4

Its not the only way women get casual sex. It is still an insanely high number for something women "hate". Why? Its obvious. They're not in the top 20% of men. Those who work out, are adventurous, and dominant slay pussy in comparison. Equality and kindness have nothing to do with their success. Being Beta for casual one night stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:20 PM
4

If you wan an LTR, being an Alpha with Beta Qualities is the best. But your killing attraction if you're pure Beta. Because I don't want to be someone's second best. since I don't have the physicallity of a Top % Alpha, I know whoever forms a relationship with me is ultimately settling because Chad won't commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:12 PM
2

If you're willing to accept someone who loves someone else more than you, you're a chump. Likewise, if a woman does not give her best in sex to you, you're a cuckold.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:08 PM
5

Tinder has millions upon millions of women on it, so that's bullshit. Women like less casual sex...with a beta male. Alphas have no worries. And if she's willing to do things for an alpha she won't with you, why should you ltr that slut?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 11:04 PM
2

Because its unattractive. You very rarely hear of stories about women so glad their man is so submissive, or how they love being the provider to a dude with only a high school degree. Equality is better than being inferior, but dominance is ultimately the best, and the only hope if you want to be an Alpha Fucks. And without enough in a ltr, your girl will lose attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:58 PM
7

Cosmo is mostly advice for women already in relationships. You're ignoring the incredible success of Tinder. They are not paid anything. They are given their choice of who to hook up with. And instead of 5s dating 5s, 7s dating 7s, or even 6 women dating 5 men, we've got 6s chasing 8s and even higher. Casual sex is the least equal form of relationship between man and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:53 PM
2

And why should men be okay with women giving away sex to higher value men who showed no traits of mutuality and companionship? It would be like if a man gave 100s of love poems to an abusive ex, but doesn't write anything for his current gf.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:50 PM
4

Where is the evidence of this? Maybe you'll find fat chicks furious that they couldn't snag a Christian Grey, but they could still find romance...if they dated down or equal. But that never happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/15 10:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter