TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bizneria Archive

View 12 posts and 298 comments by Bizneria on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
313

DiscriminationBizneria/r/MensRights10/09/16 03:14 PM
69

Bizneria/r/MensRights12/08/16 04:58 PM
60

Bizneria/r/MensRights11/09/16 06:15 AM
23

DiscriminationBizneria/r/MensRights29/08/16 11:32 AM
20

Marriage/DivorceBizneria/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:04 PM
18

Bizneria/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:02 AM
15

Bizneria/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:19 PM
9

Bizneria/r/MensRights19/08/16 07:45 AM
4

Bizneria/r/MensRights22/08/16 12:55 PM
2

Bizneria/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:09 AM
1

Bizneria/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:54 AM
0

Bizneria/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:35 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Please consider boycotting Palace.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:04 AM
2

Fortunately there is only one thing a man must remember about dating feminists: don't.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:26 PM
1

Yeah, it's a well-known scam. The health equality in Russia is better than in Sweden, because in Sweden women have two healthy years more than men while in Russia its 12 years. It's the same as with feminists: trust nothing they say. In fact, they are in all likelihood feminists.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:15 PM
1

It's not the WEF’s Gender Gap index even it reads so on the cover. According to the index the equality in health is better in Russia than in Sweden because in Russia women have about 12 healthy years more then men but in Sweden just two. It's perfect illustration of how the Feminists view equality. Actually we know know that in Iceland women are more better off than men than in most other countries. Otherwise it would not have "won" the index.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:51 AM
1

It's a group of 30 000 people then.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:42 AM
1

Mostly capable male heroes in tv series and movies because that's what people want to see. Only a few heroines in a leading role have made big bucks.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 10:34 AM
2

(I wrote this down mostly for my own benefit so that I'll hopefully remember what's permissible. The short answer to the question is: yeah, I was wrong - perhaps.) Finland. And I was a journalist taking photos myself around 20 years ago. Now when I googled for the laws it seems that a thing or two has changed. Back then the rules were pretty simple: in public (places that anybody could access) you were free to take photos (but you couldn't publish inflammatory picture). In private places (places…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:15 AM
2

I don't know about the laws in your country but where I live you must ask a permission if you take photos of individuals in a private place - let alone publish them. So, taking the photo alone would be here a cause for a civil case (in theory, at least). Possible gropings and slanders are also causes, of course, but then the man could end up losing if he was guilty. But, hmm, perhaps I didn't think it through. Actually, I'm not sure if a plane is considered a private place to begin with. Then ag…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:58 AM
1

What Duvalier Malone didn't mention is that Indira Huilica didn't refer just to Peruvian men but potentially to all Peruvians by saying that Peru is a country of rapists.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:37 AM
1

Yeah, a link would have been nice.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:22 AM
-3

Planes aren't public places so he could probably sue her ... if he's innocent. If he isn't, suing could be counter-productive.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:10 AM
6

Taking photos in public spaces, with or without people, isn't forbidden, as far as I know. So, there's probably nothing you can do?
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:07 AM
1

In my honest view there is nothing wrong with something we have to do all the time. It's only rational that we try to make the right decision even if we have very little information to go by. Let's say I wanted to have a house and got two person I could choose between to build it: Mary an Peter. If that's, for some strange reason, all I knew, the rational thing to do would be to choose Peter. That choice would be based solely on a generalization which says that a man is probably more qualified w…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 05:48 PM
3

International business has turned weird. Instead of making money it now seems to be about making up lies about a relatively powerless social movement.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:28 PM
1

We have evidence that men are more ambitious and harder-working than women, can employers use that to justify hiring more men over women I don't know if they can but they surely do. Exactly the same way you yourself do every day when you try to decide the best course of action. Because you don't know everything you must partly predict by using generalizations, probabilities: hmm, if I turn left the distance will be longer but if I turn right there are usually jams. This is not an opinion or a po…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 03:03 PM
1

They may start believing that their gender renders them aggressive, selfish, cold, and far more likely to lead violent and abusive lives. Start believing? You must be very old.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 10:28 AM
1

That's one way to go. But when designing make sure you can automate as much as possible and still claim that the product is unique in some way or, at least, very different from what others offer. And another thing to keep is mind is the ability to sell to a large market (Etsy, Amazon, FedEx and the like). Another type of work that's not going away is "people businesses", professions where the human contact is important. Women tend to have a hue advantage in these things but there still are areas…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 06:01 AM
-14

"Please, kill my children but not me, I have only one life!" The bigger picture: "Let's organize and fight the bad guys so there's a chance that our children will survive - and, if we're lucky, we too". Yes, life isn't black and white but what is black and white sure is that one day we'll all gonna be dead. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
/r/MensRights23/10/16 06:35 AM
1

If you buy or sell or otherwise distribute it, it can't be considered an altogether victimless crime and you should probably do some time (depending on other circumstances). But if nobody has suffered for what you did even theoretically, jail is in most western countries considered too harsh a punishment. But this is not the only case when the US judicial system is far more likely to give, not only jail time, but, much longer sentences. It's strange how far the USA has moved from other western c…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:52 PM
5

Where I live nobody would get jail time for only possessing that shit. I think the same goes for most western countries. The USA is a strange place when it comes to their obsession with putting people behind bars.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 06:11 AM
1

Discrimination against men should stop from education to employment in "the new economy", from the courts to cultural stereotypes. But nobody is talking about it, especially the left who would consider it a sacrilege to even hint that men discriminated against - and, for heavens sake, more than women.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 04:25 PM
1

She's probably too poor to be worth a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:31 AM
2

How are we supposed to help men when we don't even acknowledge that they're also abused? Perhaps there are powerful people within the field who think that men shouldn't be helped (unless there are clear injuries) because that would take resources away from "the primary victims". In education, in my opinion, the discrimination doesn't end because helping girls is considered more important by most professionals and helping boys would take resources away from that "primary task". That seems to be a…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 05:28 AM
5

The greatest threat to women is nature - including people, naturally - which would kill off them all if men didn't provide the systems that protect them. Or let's try a sexist approach: Women are the greatest threat to men because they expect men to protect them even by sacrificing their health and lives. Anybody can play these games but it's immoral idiots who want to.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:19 PM
2

Exactly. But this explanation is too rational for the Guardian, obviously..
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:15 PM
8

Why do these men feel that they are safe if they ask those questions? Does it really matter what the answers are when she can decide later on that she was too drunk after all.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:03 PM
1

This is what happens when irrelevant things like gender override merits. The likelihood of a catastrophe increases. Hillary Clinton and her unprofessional use of a private email account. Yahoo going down the drain.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:04 AM
3

Make women afraid of men and feminism will prevail.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:47 AM
1

[women] aren't heard. I keep hearing women are oppressed A lot of hearing from somebody who is not heard.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 05:54 AM
1

before the election has even really started In fact most people have already decided and won't be reconsidering unless something really outrageous comes up. It doesn't look good for you know who.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:57 PM
19

$1,500 - Olive Chacey Kuehn and Alfred F. Kuehn Scholarship Requirements: Male students engineering students, preferably- but not necessarily-civil engineering majors Superior academic performance Financial need
/r/MensRights14/10/16 05:06 PM
0

Trump is a catastrophe waiting to happen. Even Clinton is a better choice than the populist liar (this view came from a concerned European). Besides, Clinton is probably going to be extra careful not to look like a man hating Feminist asshole - even if she was one.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:50 PM
7

The study finds 2 to 1 preference. Reaction? “I think it’s too soon to say, ‘Okay, problem solved,’” Virginia Valian, who researches gender equity at New York’s Hunter College, told Science Magazine. They don't even try to hide their bias.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:35 AM
5

The freer and wealthier a society is the more likely people are to follow their instincts of what is fun or otherwise attractive. In poorer circumstances ambitious people tend to concentrate more on making the ends meet, getting an education that leads to well-paying job, for example.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:48 AM
3

Why compare just chores (things that has to be done to run the household) and not other work? Probably because then a different story would unfold, a story that would run against the feminist narrative. In all likelihood boys work more than girls in the kind of poor countries the article talks about. And besides, why do they don't mention anything about the more wealthy nations? Because there boys do more chores than girls (like moving the lawn in addition to helping with dishes and the like)?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:37 AM
1

In another book the author explained how daughters are supposed to bring love and warmth into the family while sons are needed to bring security as workforce.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 05:07 AM
-7

It's a - bit stupid - gimmick. Good for them if it works.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 05:56 PM
-3

The best course of self-defense is seldom hitting back. Otherwise, yeah.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 11:26 AM
2

This woman pretends that women don't talk like that in "locker rooms" when, in fact, it's women who do it much more..
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:06 AM
11

A male pilot in the near future: " I can't work with women because I need to explain things to the co-pilot so that I we're on the same page. And nowadays I feel that as a man I can't explain anything to women because that might insult them. And, trust me, you don't want to fly with an insulted co-pilot." The mansplaining meme will hit women right back in the face.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:23 PM
2

Yeah, you're right. I think that holocaust didn't happen and Doktor Mengel was a nice, misunderstood man.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 06:08 PM
2

CEOs don't spend a billion dollars without asking the owners. It's possible that the idea came from the board.of directors even. Nevertheless, the board has the final word or the general meeting.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 04:32 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it's true, not in some, but in most countries. It's a small step towards facts, though.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 06:07 PM
-68

Haven't you heard about it before? All mammals breast feed but most of them don't need that extra fat to do it. Ergo, they aren't necessary for feeding. So, you must ask yourself what are they for then. I know that not all think that they're for sexual signalling purposes but they really can't tell what they are for then.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 07:05 AM
-42

Breasts are sexual, they have no other function than sending sexual signals. Nipples not so much.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:56 PM
0

Become an athlete!
/r/MensRights30/09/16 06:48 PM
0

I seem to remember that the (quite few) atheist books I've read discussed religious cultures and beliefs much more that the existence of gods. What they fought is included pretty well in this Wikipedia's definition of religion: Religion is a cultural system of behaviors and practices, world views, sacred texts, holy places, ethics, and societal organisation that relate humanity to what an anthropologist has called "an order of existence". And that makes sense, of course, because not many want to…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 12:48 PM
0

I'd say that atheists have a strong opinion on religion while agnostics don't have any opinion. There are, indeed, people who think that this makes atheism, in a sense, a religion. Atheism plays, after all, by the rules that where set out by religions. They are believers, although not in gods. It's like a war on terrorism that resorts so much to terrorist strategies that the people who wage the war become terrorists themselves while insisting that they are not. Agnostics, on the other hand, refu…
/r/MensRights29/09/16 09:29 AM
3

In any sane organization a leader would get fired if she explained the world with an extremely controversial fringe theory that puts the blame on the people the organization should be helping.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:13 AM
2

Demonizing men keeps the money flowing to Feminist organizations.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:10 AM
1

Leftist parties tend to attract women. And parties that attract women tend to become leftist, as well as feminist. And the more to the left the more feminist. The obvious reason is that women's livelihood often depends on tax money that the leftist parties, at least in speech, hand out that money more generously. But perhaps there are other, deeper reasons. Like how men vs. women experience the world around the.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 10:01 AM
1

It's strange how "everybody" seems to think that the wages or earnings are based solely on past productivity while everybody who has ever negotiated on wages (or, say, bought shares) knows that its' not the whole truth. Employers think also the future potential of the employee and, in fact, many times that's a more important factor. Of course over time everyone has to deliver, but that doesn't change the fact. That's why there are all kinds of wage gaps that are based on predictions. And predict…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:40 AM
20

The new women's officer can prove everybody wrong, but it's a Feminist body so they probably can't distance themselves from seeing men a as predators and women as victims. It's somewhat like hoping that klan members could advice how to arrange the race relations.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 09:04 AM
0

Why on earth would you think so? LOL
/r/MensRights28/09/16 07:20 AM
-6

As I already said, there are negative stereotypes and risky likelihoods concerning both women and men. A negative stereotype about young women is that they're gonna get pregnant and concentrate more on family afterwards. All young women suffer from it although not all get pregnant or tart to concentrate on the family. But it's true on average and tend to have some effect on the salary and the likelihood of getting the job. Men are considered to be less sympathetic and likable, more irresponsible…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 12:09 PM
10

What's wrong? Well, many people, Clinton probably too, think that making babies shouldn't be a reason to be paid less. Of course those people who actually pay the wages and have to compete to survive don't think that way. They think that if there's a risk that a woman will get pregnant and can't or won't give 100% after that, they just have to take that into consideration. Big, wealthy companies often don't but most firms can't afford it. Exactly the same way they take into consideration the neg…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:24 AM
1

This straw obviously broke the camel's back. I'd say that a very fat camel-like phenomenon will break the first row.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:51 PM
2

I have learned how to navigate through difficult passages in stormy weathers. But I haven't learned all the routes and never will. That doesn't make me naive, though. It makes me an experienced navigator. :)
/r/MensRights25/09/16 06:52 AM
1

Lol. If I said that I could navigate a ship through these dangerous waters because I've been doing it for decades, you'd say that I'm too inexperienced. "I'll do it because I once thought about it and read an article on navigation." Lol.
/r/MensRights25/09/16 04:43 AM
9

"Don't look at me if I don't think you're hot". Could I make money by selling t-shirts with that text on Feminist forums - like The Guardian?
/r/MensRights24/09/16 05:12 PM
2

Well, most women have done something similar. I mean, if we banned all DV women from these kinds of jobs, they should nominate men!
/r/MensRights24/09/16 10:05 AM
2

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3419901/You-never-fancy-man-house-husband-breadwinnner-raised-children-Ursula-husband-swapped-roles-devastating-verdict.html I was house husband (what a strange word) after our first child. Took care of the home and did some studying. Not relaxing exactly, but better than the job I had at the time. But in a few years it could have turned into a very comfortable lifestyle. But when our second child was born my wife wanted to change back to the "normal".
/r/MensRights24/09/16 09:56 AM
5

Yes they are biased, but what's perhaps even more important is that certain boys don't have role models to look up to in their lives. Fathers are missing. Schooling becomes something girls and women do together.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 05:06 AM
0

Steven Hawking will never become a NFL player He's an outlier. You can't debunk a statistical trend or a theory based on generalized observations by referring to ouliers because if you could there would be no science, no theories, no statistics. Women with the skills to become CEOs will never outnumber the men with those skills There are industries where female CEOs are in majority. Publishing comes to mind. You can't change the hardware (biology) with the software (society). Yes you can, obviou…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:25 PM
1

Never said it was. Yes, but as I said its ALSO about those things I mentioned. And what's biological, as you know, does not necessarily determine what we are. We can become monks or stop eating. Women could be denied the choice of becoming "home makers" and that would make women more successful in other areas. Men are dropping out of the education system which perhaps means that they don't "want to become something" the way they used to.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:01 PM
1

It's a common mistake to think that nature and nurture, biological and sociological exclude each other. So, I won't hold your opinion against you, if you just promise to educate yourself more. :)
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:07 PM
1

Also it's about probabilities that the western culture produces by placing different expectations on women and men. If the expectation is that you should "become something", like a CEO, you are more likely to become one. In other words, it's not solely about biology.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:35 AM
2

Also women have more choices. And with choices come trade-offs. If you choose family, you can't - usually - choose to become a president. Privileges tend to have trade-offs. For every president or CEO there are millions of disappointed men - and women - who didn't make it.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:05 AM
14

"They're expected to, kind of, take on that male gender role of I'm the man, I will provide for myself. Unfortunately, that's not everybody's truth. That's not everybody's story," Peach said. I don't believe that's the (whole) problem. When we see a man in a gutter we don't think that he should stand up and be a man. Instead we think: that's disgusting, I want nothing to do with him. When we see a woman in a gutter we think: that's disgusting, hmm, perhaps I should call somebody to help her. It'…
/r/MensRights22/09/16 04:47 PM
3

I'm pretty sure that it was outsiders who reported it. Just saying, it could still be a plot to frame Pitt.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 02:00 PM
1

Trump can use a meme just like feminists can. Yes, if he wants to be as immoral or stupid as feminists.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:42 AM
1

If only we could make the percentage to 100, then we could get rid of male professors altogether.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:19 PM
3

however campaigners say the statistics serve as a reminder that while the overwhelming majority of abusers are male We have a long way to go, many lies to debunk.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:38 AM
1

Why do I get accused of misandry just for pointing out the privilege of straight, white men? Well, Holly, that's because you haven't learned that important rule most Feminists follow: discuss you sexist views only with other sexists.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 07:35 AM
1

Naive: having or showing a lack of experience. I just told you where I stand because you thought I was being naive. Marriage is about having a family - that's always there for you. It's about love an caring on this yeast covered rock that speeds through cold nothingness.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 06:55 AM
1

You are too naive. Close to 30 years of marriage behind me.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 04:35 AM
1

If there was a bowl of candies and I'd told you that all them made you die in the long run, would you take a candy? No? What if I told you that the candies were called "life".
/r/MensRights20/09/16 02:42 PM
0

marry for like 12 years then can divorce and still live comfortably. why would anyone put up with anyone then? Love? Kids? Company? You know, feelings ...
/r/MensRights19/09/16 06:44 AM
2

Why does everyone complain about women being raped in wartime but not about all the men FUCKING? A bad joke, eh?
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:32 PM
1

The number of false accusations is what statisticians call a "dark number" -- that is, there is a true number, but it is unknown, and perhaps unknowable. I wonder in what sense that is true. There is a huge grey area where nobody knows if the rape happened in the first place. There is, in other words, no true number of rapes, let alone of false accusations. Of course there are those cases that are clear cut: nothing happened and yet a man was accused. That number isn't "perhaps unknowable". It i…
/r/MensRights17/09/16 08:42 AM
33

It's like they're anti-Feminists, publishing this kind of shit that everybody understands as shit.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 08:12 AM
37

Some Feminists learn to understand and respect boys when they become mothers and raise their own sons. Some remain ignorant assholes.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 08:01 AM
7

Most feminists are just ignorant people who don't know how to think clearly and critically.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 09:17 AM
3

Our current cultural expectations, legislative system, and social programming work to sustain a hierarchy that constantly places men on the top. Consequently, men consistently achieve, succeed, and benefit at the expense of every other gender. That’s called male privilege. And on the bottom as well. That's called female privilege. The difference is that on the bottom there are much more people. And the successful men almost always share the fruits of their hard work with at least one woman while…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 06:13 AM
3

Aggression can be a force for good or bad, so can violence.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 12:47 PM
3

Did Ted Bundy ask at work if anybody was interested in killing people with him? It just seems too unlikely that you ask people to rape a ten your old and nobody does anything.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 12:23 PM
3

It's rather a rule than an exception, in particularly informative laboratory tests and surveys like this, that not everything is revealed to the participants. The ides is, of course, to get more truthful answers when participants are not reflecting their thinking about something that interests the researcher. It's a huge problem in all surveys. Before downvoting me try to understand that this is a fact not an opinion.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 10:58 AM
10

mother admitting that she sought out strangers online and at her place of work to sexually assault her daughter Does this sound a bit unlikely to anybody else? "Hi Paul, could you come over and rape my daughter after you have finished that report?" "Eh, sure, eh, let me make just one phone call before we go." My guess is that at that point she just didn't care what lies she told the police. But, then again, who knows? Too much drugs can make you psychotic.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 06:36 AM
-1

Feminists tend to support all ideas that make it harder for men to get jobs, careers, and higher earnings. Paid leaves for fathers do exactly that. Both Feminist and supporters of equality want parental leaves for fathers - but Feminists want to hurt men and fathers while the rest want to help them and the children.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 05:09 AM
2

It's a fringe theory outside Feminism. Why should you believe in theories that are ignored by almost all credible scholars? If patriarchy exists, why are women on average so much better off than men? If patriarchy is upheld with violence, what should be thought about the fact that in the west women are at least as violent as men towards their partners and kids and lesbian relationships are the most violent? What power relations are upheld by violent women? That's crazy talk.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:32 AM
1

I'd like to see a survey asking women: "Have you made plans on how to frame your partner by accusing him of violence or sexual assault?" Getting truthful answers would be hard, of course, but it would be interesting nevertheless. I mean, I really don't know how common it is. Are almost all women making plans like this after a fight or otherwise?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:37 AM
7

I'm baffled by the discussion on how to lure girls into STEM, and specifically IT areas of higher education. Why would anybody try to equalize any industry to make it gender-balanced? Does the society need 50% elementary school teachers to be men? Yes it does. The school is supposed to be the most important mechanism the society uses to level the playing field. So, unlike STEM, the school has an important social function to fulfill. But it's not doing it's job because it discriminates against bo…
/r/MensRights14/09/16 03:48 AM
2

Gandhi, King, Hitler ... countless men have complained and people have listened. Complaining and victimization in the core of almost all political and social movements. And men have led them more than women. It's only when men start to talk about the plight of men when most people turn away. Or, at least, people hugely prefer listening to those who talk about the plight of women (and children). Charities helping men get some donations but charities for women get probably hundred times more. Like…
/r/MensRights13/09/16 04:58 AM
5

According to the article King's College actually tried to find out. Men are doing more demanding jobs which explains at leas part of the gap. So, probably, yes.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 10:50 AM
22

It sounds like the plan is to raise all women's individual salaries although the difference is in average salaries. That again would mean that a female professor doing the same job as a male professor and earning already the same (or even more) would start earning more than the male professor for no reason other than sexism. That again would feel so unfair that the male professor would start looking for a new job outside the academia or abroad. Welcome!
/r/MensRights12/09/16 09:32 AM
2

That was a strange Pfost, Annie.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 05:57 AM
-1

Who could have guessed that one of the world's wealthiest countries is socialist! :D
/r/MensRights11/09/16 07:15 AM
7

Cancer cells send messages to the body telling that they are in trouble. The body answers by sending help, it forms new blood vessels, for example, to transfer oxygen to the cancer cells. But that is actually making the body weaker because the cancer cells don't have the body's well-being "in mind" but their own.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 06:47 AM
3

No mention of boys FYI.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:31 PM
9

There have been (informal) quotas within parties for decades. I've heard that "it's hard to find young men for elections, why aren't they interested in politics anymore?". I think it's pretty obvious that they opt out when they realize how much harder it's going to be to be. In business it isn't as bad - although it's often bad there, too. But that's not necessarily what happens with boards because they can simply increase the number of members. "Here's the deal: we can't find women that are qua…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:22 PM
11

Exactly ... but you can't because nobody is afraid of short men the way they are afraid of Feminists.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:09 PM
58

Belgium, France, Germany, Iceland, India, Israel, Italy, Norway and Spain currently have legislated quotas for women on corporate boards of publicly listed companies..](https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Gender_representation_on_corporate_boards_of_directors#/Gender_quotas) There are several others that have plans to implement a quota system. And yes, it's wrong and shows the amount of influence a movement, that almost nobody likes, has.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:01 PM
3

Not once in the article it's mentioned that it's women who buy about 80 or 90% of all fashion. And probably won't in the upcoming articles either. It's gonna be one of those article series that go around the real issues like a cat around hot porridge. "We just can't blame women, can't you come up with a plan so that we can blame it all on men!?" But I was surprised that they started the story with two killed boys. Perhaps they discussed whether they could change them to girls or not but then dec…
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:58 PM
2

A researcher said on the radio that every time he guardian publishes something about women there is a big bunch of men writing misogynist comments and that's a huge problem for a newspaper that embraces the freedom of speech. Poor guardian.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 11:00 AM
3

bragging about the first female president in the history of mankind Huh? She has talked to several female presidents. Do you think she has dementia?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 06:04 AM
1

And that's why people are going to vote for a woman until one gets elected. Then the issue isn't anymore interesting and they'll start looking elsewhere. Many people have fighting discrimination in the center of their worldview and glass ceilings as a proof of it.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:56 AM
1

What's so wow about something so mundane? Many people see "glass ceilings" as a problem and want them to break. When they think that has happened they start to look elsewhere. It's not a brilliant world view but that's what many people think. But I suppose it's too difficult to understand, folks.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 05:43 AM
-5

I have no idea what's your point.What I said about a female president or prime minister is true, though. Been there, seen it. Can't help you you don't get it. Bye.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 05:27 PM
1

One theory is that evolution made women send visual signals when seeing became more important than smelling. And men were made to get aroused by them.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:51 PM
-7

After a Hispanic president it could stop because the demographics you mentioned are much smaller. But who knows, perhaps a minority woman or a disabled candidate could gather enough support.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:28 PM
1

They should try to amend the constitutions(s) and remove the constitutional rights from Caucasian heterosexual men.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 03:32 PM
-5

Every democratic country has to have the first female leader. Afterwards the whole issue isn't that important anymore outside the Feminist circles.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 03:17 PM
2

This caused some confusion, because they had to start to think that a great deal even a majority of the traffickers should be seen as victims, too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:58 AM
5

Let's not forget what really matters!
/r/MensRights09/09/16 07:37 AM
11

The Feminists who say what the pictures depict don't have a clue about economics. Pretty much everything that is produced is produced for consumers - or voters if the production is paid with tax money - in the end. Who else? Aliens? So most of the ugly factories growing out of the man's head exist to satisfy the needs of the woman who has ironically a shopping bag, among other things, growing out of hers. And it's not just that women spend more, they also tend to spend more than men on things th…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 04:42 AM
1

The definition of unfounded seems to be false or baseless because that's the basis of their categorization, no? But that doesn't say much to me. "False" I understand because it refers to a clear intention. But "baseless" can mean many things like memory problems or misunderstandings but also false. So, why not just "baseless"?
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:58 PM
2

https://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/handbook/ucrhandbook04.pdf "False or baseless complaints."
/r/MensRights08/09/16 05:35 PM
1

There many different scenarios in which they don't: too drunk, for example, or playing along and deciding afterwards it was a rape.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 05:29 PM
8

And you never now, when you talk about these things in public, if somebody is a Feminist and gets pissed off. Most people in my experience are sympathetic, though, or show, at least, simple human kindness and don't start raving. But I don't recommend talking if your job depends on your reputation. There could be a Feminist among you customers or bosses.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 05:07 PM
2

In Germany in WW2 it was OK to kill Jews. I mean you could just go up and shoot one in the head, and the (white, Christian) government would give you a pat on the back. AS a side note, I don't think Nazis let civilians kill Jews. They were more like law and order kind of guys. And they weren't christians either as a party although some of them could be privately.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:50 PM
1

1) They are ignorant or 2) they are stupid or 3) they are immoral or 4) they are insane or 5) there's something essential you don't understand. I think that in this case it's all of them except for the last one. Not so that every person is all that but so that they all fall into one ore more category.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 03:35 PM
1

Clicking the video led to a suspicious ad.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 10:52 AM
4

Surprise surprise, misogyny in the gay community has reared it’s scruffy, masc4masc head again. How is it, in 2016, that gay men could be found to side more often with the disgruntled, tragic men’s rights activists than the rest of the LGBTIQA community? My experience is that gay men over time learn to think critically by dismissing cultural memes and the like regarding women. That's because they don't censor themselves like straight men do. If they see for example a double standard, they say it…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:01 AM
6

Yeah, more female peace keepers is a good idea (in theory, at least). But of course they have to play the victim card - it's the guardian after all - and that ruins it for me. Why can't these just say the way it is: war hurts men and women, girls and boys but because of the imbalance in the troops we need more women. She tries to convince the readers with figures: Current conflicts disproportionately affect women. It is conservatively estimated that 70% of those killed in today’s conflicts are c…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 08:05 AM
2

The majority? At least that's been the case so far.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:21 AM
1

Spreading disinformation. Try to get them removed.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 06:56 AM
30

I wonder how common is poor understanding of the male psyche among the female psychologists. Soon there will be few men in the profession.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 06:32 AM
2

Male violence against women is both a cause and a consequence of gender inequality, in this country and across the world. It is right and essential that official bodies strive to reduce and eliminate such offences, as an end in itself and as part of a broader strategy to combat gender-based injustice Yeah, I just red cursory a few lines here and there after this very Guardian-like opening. It didn't seem to address the obvious reasons (Feminism) why the statistics are so biased.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 06:55 PM
13

The Guardian is truly a Feminist paper: sexist, stupid, and immoral.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 05:11 PM
4

Society punishes them if they don't get acrylic nails. What society is this? Honestly, is it some Upper East Side society or what? And how do they punish women who don't have acrylic nails? Are they whipped or what?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 04:48 PM
3

There are Feminists who admit, at least in private, that women tend to lead on average better lives than men and are treated better in most situations. But what even these remarkably rational Feminists (taking into account that Feminists are usually pretty irrational) can't agree on is that women have a lot of power, too. If they could, it would, after all take away most of the justification of Feminism that is left after you have admitted that women have it better. Understandable.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:16 PM
2

So long as people see men as brutes and women as damsels in distress nothing is going to happen whatever the facts say. Feminism is based on this biology and that's why it's not going to go anywhere anytime soon.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 08:55 AM
2

It's like somebody ordered to include men and boys and they really didn't like the idea but did it in this stupid way so they could say: "but we did include boys and men".
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:14 PM
6

I was just about to call the press.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 03:42 PM
1

12% of the Canadians think that their leader must be a Feminist! Sounds pretty alarming, actually. I wonder how many think that it okay to be Feminist. The share should be a few percentages - if you think how sexist, aggressive, and overall crazy Feminists tend to be - but it must well over 12%. The Racists, Nazis, got 37% of the votes when Hitler ran for president in 1932.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 01:21 PM
1

Think if there were resources and will to study and publish gender related questions in a honest manner. How much more we would know about them! Now most people probably believe, for example, that men are valued higher then women.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 01:02 PM
11

Randi Harper, explained away the behavior as some kind of Stockholm Syndrome, writing on Twitter: "fact: when people are under abuse for an extended period of time, that trauma can modify their behavior and make them imitate their abusers." Damsel in distress syndrome: The urge to accuse something or someone else, men in particular, of the despicable actions of a woman. Used to get a pussy pass.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:35 AM
11

Usually nothing happens, though. Or if something is done, it's inspired by Feminism or other confused theories that often stress the importance of not treating pupils as members of any group but as individuals. Don't get me wrong, a transgendered male lesbian should have heers rights looked after. But that's not what this is about. There are certain key differences (on average) between girls and boys that should have been taken into account decades ago. It's no different from dividing pupils int…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 11:10 AM
3

Two similarly productive persons tend to earn the same. But sometimes the employer wants to measure the long-term productivity: how much can I earn with this person not today but in, say, two years? In such cases women under about 40 might get paid less because the chances that she'll quit or otherwise wants to concentrate on her family are greater. But women under 40 aren't systematically paid less which tells that something else must be going on. Either women have other productive qualificatio…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:16 AM
4

Unfortunately, in this game of love it's the woman who almost always is both a player and a referee. And the one who makes the rules as she goes. The only way a man - or a male chimp, for that matter - can play and win is to guess what's going on, what are the rules this time and how not to break them. If the referee says the game is over, it isn't necessarily. Perhaps the referee just wants to check that you listen to her when she whistles.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:13 AM
2

Men wake up to see the world values women and doesn't value men. I remember seeing a survey where most people (was it in Britain?) considered masculinity a positive thing. Younger people and the young men, in particular, saw it as a less positive, though. Anyway, a clear majority seems to value men and masculinity. I'd say that even people who call themselves Feminists don't think men are all bad, not all of them, anyway. Sure, the society - or the government, at least - in the west tend to valu…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:48 AM
1

It was tagged as "Men's health"! :D
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:32 AM
28

“What is being challenged here is the general sense of entitlement,” explains Michael Kimme That's one of the key lies they use to fight any attempts to solve problems like education gap, health, homelessness and dozens of other issues where men have it worse. "Men just whine because they have a little less entitlement nowadays." What's infuriating is that these sexist assholes have huge media outlets, political parties, academic resources, and what not at their disposal. The facts and the more …
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:01 AM
3

You just don't understand how the UN is taking over the world. They already have black helicopters hovering over my tin hat.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 04:51 AM
2

A slight exaggeration of the role the UN or ICANN have and can have within the international law. ;) The article itself isn't as overblown as the title above, but I still don't understand what it means by saying that "the Wall Street Journal‘s L. Gordon Crovitz points out that ICANN will need to be run by a state agency in order to retain its antitrust exemption". ICANN is a non-profit organization in California.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 04:45 AM
0

If you're conservative you're bound to think that sex roles are valuable (if they aren't forced but organic). The more progressive people might think otherwise but not necessarily. The biological differences between the sexes have huge consequences because they make a lot of the dynamics of any society. For example, in general the way women look make men want to protect them. Everybody nowadays wants a society that is based on a "leveled playing field" and merits. In theory, very few actually ca…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:32 PM
6

In poor areas, where manual labor is needed to survive and where women move a way when married with a dowry, boys are naturally favored. In rich, western countries, on the other hand, girls are favored. Just check out the adoptions. And why not adopt a girls rather than a boy? Girls are much more likely to have a good life.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 12:24 PM
3

Hopefully he'll get tons of royalties. There's an interview after the song. Seems like a very likable chap in this video from the 80s or early 90s.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 06:12 AM
13

The gender scholars in the nation’s leading women’s studies departments, law schools, and research institutes are captive to the “women-are-victims” narrative and they will not give it up. I don’t know what motivates them. If you don't, you're captive to the same narrative. Feminist must claim that women are victims in various ways and disregard facts because otherwise somebody could ask why the better-off sex should need so much more support than the worse-off sex. A wannabe egalitarian Feminis…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 05:57 AM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights05/09/16 03:30 AM
2

A sad story worth some empathy. The way things are going we're going to see demands of women to get impregnated by the state and the children taken care of mostly by somebody else than the mother. That's because it's getting harder and harder for women to find "good men" as the gender gap widens. And the "mother lifestyle" is at the same time getting less desirable for those same women who are getting ahead of men.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:30 AM
2

Nice. Shouldn't there to be a movement that teaches men to bluff? That way all strategical position would get covered: evasion, attack, negotiation and bluff. There is a whole industry of women's magazines and other media that teaches women how to make men do their bidding.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:18 AM
3

If you are signe in there are is bound be differences because the algorithms know a lot about you. Furthermore cookies in your browser tell a lot even if you haven't signed in.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:56 AM
45

Yeah, Google's billion dollar business pretty much depends on the algorithms that deliver results people are searching for. There is some room for politics: what the majority wants is often by definition what is politically correct. But because the algorithms are secret (for good reason) nobody knows how much there are explicit rules to avoid certain pages that seem to tell "unpleasant" things that could upset customers. Google wields huge power, at least potentially. (Unfortunately, outside the…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 05:42 AM
3

For example, I grew up genuinely truly in my heart of heart believing - in a "never really consider it because it's just fact" way - that men don't actually want to be or enjoy being dads. Sorry to hear. Most of us have loving dads or, at least, have closely watched a relative who's a loving father.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:16 AM
1

That's a good point.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 02:02 PM
1

A lot of between the lines reading is needed. What I understood was: We can't say anything about the culprits in general but that they are boys and men. Not all boys are men are misogynists, though, and they should do what we want them to do. Only the violence girls and women face is important to the equality minister, not the violence boys and men face. The same goes for any other problem.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:18 PM
0

Most false accusations are dropped before they even get reported. What those are like you can sometimes see on TV when they show programs like Cops: A drunken or extremely agitated woman says she's been raped. The policemen ask the accused about it an d he soon can prove his innocence. The woman withdraws the accusation. If you know any policemen, ask about it. Rape accusations come naturally to amazingly many women when the police arrives to the scene.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 11:38 AM
1

I've heard the police in at least two cities say that over 50% of the rape accusations are later on withdrawn or proven to be false. I believe it must be the most over-reported crime by a large margin - by this standard, at least. But the point is that with laws like this they are trying to make certain alleged rape cases and convictions more likely. This is going to have unintended consequences, like increasing the number of false allegations and men's willingness to give in rather than fight f…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 08:38 AM
1

How much more unlikely victim of a false accusation that would make a random man? Certainly it would make a difference but you could still end up in jail for years. Or paying to avoid it. The only viable answer is to start recording everything you do. If the risk was small, no men would do it. But increasing the risk beyond an unbearable limit for certain men, like celebrities, would and will create a market. And the mobile app firms will answer. I'm quite sure this is the future they are creati…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 07:30 AM
0

The title is strange. What has Google to do with it? Does Bing work or better or is it that most of the resources are directed to women?
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:54 AM
-2

These kinds of laws decrease the probability of rapes (by men, at least) but increase the probability of false accusations of rape (by women, mostly). Likewise it makes it easier for women to use rape accusations as a weapon. "You'll let me have the kids or I'll say you had sex with me while I was drunk". Or even: "give me money or I'll say we had sex the night you passed out on the couch". If the minimum is three years in prison and men have actually no way to prove that she is lying (how do yo…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:45 AM
3

The summer of love has officially ended.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:26 AM
3

Nothing. It's about facts. Almost anybody can understand facts at least potentially. Some people just don't and some movements willingly return away from them.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:08 PM
3

They think they do because they know so little about equal rights. Many Soviet communists, for example, thought they were doing good for the Soviet citizens because they refused to know what the life was like an preferred fantasies instead.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:13 AM
2

65 percent of the nation’s inmates meet certain medical criteria for substance abuse and addiction,
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:05 AM
0

Yeah, women are gate keepers because they want sex far less than men. That gives them power over men and, boy, don't they know how to use it!
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:11 AM
8

Certain key statistics Feminist use have been known to be false for decades. The most obnoxious example is the DV statistics they frequently use to attack men (and children, in fact, too). And they just don't die. It's as if the movement was immune to facts when they are after their enemies. You might say that that's what many political ideologies are like. But those other ideologies are, at least, honest enough to say out loud who they despise and not pretend to help them. Feminism, on the othe…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:05 AM
1

For a fashion statement it has lived past pretty much any other fashion. I think there's more to it.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:51 PM
3

Sounds reasonable. I added the link because I have seen high heels mostly as a sexual symbol. But if you think about them as a class symbol ... the passion many women have for them makes the plot much more interesting. What are those women actually telling and to whom? "Men, don't even dream of demanding me to work!"
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:47 PM
1

I think so. It's a theory of the leisure class, after all. Later on that changed, of course. Nowadays men must look sporty and business-like. Many women still signal that they don do manual work.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:34 PM
1

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2015/06/08/general-election-2015-how-britain-really-voted/ Perhaps there is somewhere a historical overview but that's how it's nowadays.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 04:09 AM
1

I've been married for 20 years and have three kids. My biggest fear is that the gap between girls and boys keeps growing because that could mean the end of the civilized world as we know it. I see Feminism as an self-evident enemy in this. Yeah, I know that an angry video nerd understands nothing of this.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:58 AM
2

A misunderstanding. What I meant was that in Europe very few talk about a rape culture. It seems to be a American invention and living mostly there. The meme.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:59 PM
0

This rape culture thing seems to be, indeed, mostly an American thing. I'm not sure why, because there are crazy Feminists everywhere.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:12 PM
2

The concept of rape is inflating like the Weimar mark.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 05:24 PM
1

I know it's true where I live and thought it sounded so unbelievable that I googled for it for the UK. I meant to add the link but forgot.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 01:52 PM
48

When women, mothers talk even The Washington Post starts to listen.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 01:27 PM
2

Women vote for Labour more than men. Usually women favor parties that strive for a bigger public sector and give them thus jobs
/r/MensRights29/08/16 12:06 PM
16

It's a brilliant list. It shows very clearly which sex is worse off in one of the countries where "the official truth" claims the opposite. It's certain that the same kind of a list could be gathered in any other western country 7 years ago or today. (The problem is that in many countries we know how many girls study in STEM but not how many men are sleeping in parks.) a campaign intended to point out how poverty in Africa (PDF from One Campaign) can often disproportionately affect women Rationa…
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:18 AM
9

There's a lot of academic literature about why women fear more and why they more risk avert.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 12:42 PM
2

Yeah, i figured that much and could have added an´friendly smiley, sorry. :)
/r/MensRights28/08/16 12:38 PM
1

If it amazes you, you don't know what feminism is about.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:34 AM
4

Why are some men set off by even the mention of feminism? 1) It's not just men 2) All political movements have opponents 3) Movements which resort to hate movement tactics encounter particularly strong opposition. If you cant stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Learn to be a decent person. Don't support extremists.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:30 AM
1

You can but shouldn't. "Come here boy!"
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:57 AM
2

Just stop talking to women you don't know. It's an age-old wisdom.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 07:54 AM
1

There are people who try to trump Trump up by pretending to be against him with absolutely crazy arguments.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:49 AM
1

Yeah, and in addition the Olympic committee has actually a strategy to increase the share of women from what it is, 45%, to 50% (and, who knows, perhaps even beyond). I'm not sure how it's supposed to be achieved but it could mean among other hings that countries like the US send more women than men.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:13 AM
3

Is she evil or crazy?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 01:26 PM
1

Overall, not just the USA.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 08:08 AM
1

One explanation is that they want as many women as men in the games, in Rio it was 55% men. But because there are many countries which just can't send as many women as men (because female sports are even less popular than men's sports) countries like USA (and many other western countries) try to compensate by sending more women. Besides, Women are favored everywhere, why not in sports?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:13 AM
0

Pure speculation. Or if it's not, tell about the sources.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 06:05 AM
1

We must demand that the senator tells who in the senate is going to rape. It's our duty to demand this before the damsels there get raped by a senator or other employer.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:36 PM
3

Let's make suicides a Feminist problem affecting girls and tell boys to stop acting stupid and kill themselves - don't they see that the problems of boys and men makes our narrative seem less credible. Just stop. Some variation of this theme seems to the solution to every gendered problem. Professor Vikram Patel, a psychiatrist who was recently featured in Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People for his work in global mental health, is blunt in his diagnosis: “The most probable reason is gen…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 07:30 PM
1

www.standford.rape
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:32 AM
1

It's not gendered.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 06:00 AM
10

Yes you do and in particular if you're making lists. At least where I live.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:39 PM
1

no
/r/MensRights24/08/16 06:16 PM
5

I consider that unfair because we really can't be sure unless the accuser is convicted (if even then but that's another discussion). Besides, making public lists of people is forbidden in many jurisdictions for different reasons. The sexual offenders lists are very problematic, too, in my opinion. There are very few countries that allow even them
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:56 PM
24

AS far as I know there is no legal way of knowing which accusations are false unless there is a conviction. It would be illegal to make a list of "criminals" who aren't criminals legally, i.e. who are not convicted in the court of law. So, the list would comprise only of those women who have been convicted of a false accusation. That list would be pretty short but, yeah useful.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:58 PM
7

I once had a discussion with a affluent and influential politician who had been working as a jury member for years (yes, over here a certain percentage of the jury members are laymen who are paid for their "duty"). I told her that according to studies men are more likely to end up in prison. Her answer was: so what. There just aren't more women who could be sentenced to prison. I said that it's still a problem that a women are treated more leniently for the same kind of crimes. She said: "Do I n…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 08:31 AM
1

Just wait and see how the earnings gap will be transformed into a good thing now that it favors women. (How can, BTW, the public sector pay more than the private sector, it's insane.)
/r/MensRights24/08/16 04:51 AM
2

If you're in the charity business, choose women (or children) as the target group. That way you can maximize the cash flow. But I hope it's changing. I never give money to sexist charities like Plan or Amesty.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:32 AM
5

The huge risk is that when traditional families become more rare the glue that keeps the societies together becomes weaker. Nobody knows what will happen - but articles like this can give some food for thought http://articles.latimes.com/2005/apr/24/opinion/oe-dubner24. Single mothers are much less likely to succeed with raising boys.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 07:33 PM
1

I've read too many crazy Feminist articles in Aftonbladet and other papers. That's because there used to be this lively, interesting and well moderated discussion forum by - what was his name? googling, yes - Pär Ström. Because of following him I think I know something about the craziness. Unless the climate has changed since then.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:41 PM
2

I really don't know what you mean. Surely the feminist media and politics are pretty crazy, crazier that in most countries. And it's hard to admit within the politically correct discourse that girls actually want to be close to boys and feel, among other things, the sexual excitement. Are you Swedish?
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:12 PM
1

What an unpleasant female person!
/r/MensRights23/08/16 09:52 AM
74

Googling for "male teacher had sex with girl" brings forth results like this: THE BIG LIST: FEMALE TEACHERS WITH STUDENTS So, yeah, you seem to be right.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:23 AM
2

But it won't happen. "Shias to that direction, Sunnis there, men only here, Isis guys with bombs far over there, women right front of the stage ..."
/r/MensRights23/08/16 06:05 AM
5

My friend is a rock star. He refuses to meet groups of female fans unless there is a "body guard" present to remove those women who get too "friendly". Sometimes that's not enough and he needs to remove himself. It's the middle-aged women in particular, he told me. Patriarchy hurts men, too. /s
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:42 AM
10

It's hard to fight the phenomenon because there are several (Swedish) taboos at work: 1) you can't really profile or target the scum who is doing this because that would be considered racist 2) You can't say out loud that often women are just so drunk or otherwise confused - by Feminism for example - that they make false accusations (there are several examples of this) 3) Feminists, who are the most vocal on these issues, are particularly crazy in Sweden but saying it out loud would be a social …
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:28 AM
45

Protecting women and children is one of the foundations of any successful civilization. BUT in modern societies it's become a harmful bias. How to teach people that you're not putting women in danger when you demand a fair society for the worse-off sex? I'm also not sure it can be done.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 04:00 PM
1

She's making no sense whatsoever and is still allowed to write for the independent. WTF? The stupidity is too much. I have to get a new hobby.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:38 PM
3

Check the definition.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:21 PM
1

Yeah, sympathy gap is clearly better.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:12 PM
11

These people aren't just stupid, they are evil. It's known from hundreds of studies that women are at least as violent as men in relationships. It's been known for decades. There are several statistics that show that lesbian relationships are more violent than straight ones . It's been known for decades that men don't get the help they need inn violent relationships. Even talking about violence against children has been silenced by these people when it's done by the more likely sex: women. But t…
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:09 PM
3

I've worked in two universities and I think it's fear. Sane people are afraid of speaking up because stupid people (those who see the world through cultural stereotypes and memes) hate everything that's not politically correct. In particular they hate everybody who doesn't understand how much in distress the damsels are.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 12:36 PM
9

Welsh Women’s Aid, for example, receives funding from us to deliver the Live Fear Free helpline – a 24 hour help and advice service for both men and women.” Of course. LOL. The name alone tells what they are doing: helping men and women.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 10:04 AM
3

100 times is probably the goal.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 10:02 AM
2

My wife's cousin moved to Australia last year. I have to warn him. :)
/r/MensRights22/08/16 09:29 AM
1

“Social science research contradicts the assumption the B.C. government is making,” Who needs research!? We're in the business of making the powerful people feel good. For decades now. Now, shut up!
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:40 AM
4

It's like somebody's trying to discredit feminism by making a parody of the silly oppression fantasies they have. I hope bright students can see it for what it is.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:27 AM
326

The man isn't strictly speaking a pedophile but the women are. Not that anybody should approve of what he did. The women are clearly much more evil, though. But because they are women and their victim male they were treated more leniently.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:12 AM
2

The impression Ms Pryce would like to leave you with after reading this book seems to be a utopian image of the "girls" in prison – most of whom are downtrodden, completely innocent (despite having pleaded guilty) and are, in fact, only in prison because of men. On this basis, this book really should be in the fiction section. Pure fiction at that. It's sad that emotional fiction triumphs over facts in politics. In particular, in feminist issues. But what can you do? Write a brilliant debunking …
/r/MensRights21/08/16 06:36 AM
3

Whatever, they don't care.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:35 PM
1

Yeah, boys are actually less intelligent and favored by teachers. LOL. It's amazing how far a feminist mindset can go. What's next? Boys smell worse?
/r/MensRights20/08/16 01:53 PM
1

Heh, I happened to listen to the Internet whatever mastery podcast while doing the dishes. It's not that great, by the way. But I did get dish one bright idea: yes, quite a few men are better than women at some things because they have to take a different, proactive role. Women's role in this fundamental and cognitively formative game, dating, is more passive which probably means that they don't learn certain key patterns and attitudes which help in business etc.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:48 AM
2

The fact is that men and women have on average different incentives and behavioral patterns from early on and that makes them different later on. What's wrong with that?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 03:39 PM
2

So they say: 'We are not judging ourselves by those standards that you idiotic dinosaur-like men judge yourself by He didn't hate white men enough, apparently.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:07 AM
8

They are give female names and voices for the same reason why people in service jobs tend to be female: people like to interact with women more than with men. Women are wonderful, after all. Feminists, trying to argue as rational persons, are a joke. They should have room in proper media only as jokes.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 03:56 AM
-1

It's not a western thing. In most western countries business is as usual.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 10:24 AM
-160

He wasn't charged with DV or rape.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:41 PM
5

It's mostly because even violent idiots don't usually want to hurt women.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 01:14 PM
5

Had it been father daughter relationship, Jezebel would be demanding hanging by the testicles.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:21 PM
3

It looks like a comedy site, but I'm sure they're asking money somewhere.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 07:25 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it's patriarchy that prevents them from succeeding.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:16 PM
6

She must be talking about the homeless people when she says that men are doing better than women because of patriarchy. They, after all, seem to spend their time pretty relaxed most of the time. And how often do you see a woman laying there in the gutter? Hardly ever! Or perhaps she had the prison population in mind. In many prisons you actually don't have to work at all. And, yes you guessed it, men take up most of the prison positions. Patriarchy! And what about the people who kill themselves …
/r/MensRights15/08/16 06:17 AM
1

Makeup. That could be the answer like it is to women. But women don't like girly looking men and makeup tends to make men girly - or weird - looking, so ...
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:45 AM
3

Feminists don't usually want equality either. Perhaps you're a feminist but don't know it yet.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:23 AM
1

In general sexism - discriminating, not because of productivity but, because of gender (or race) - is not a good business practice. Small firms can't afford it, in particular, but big firms sometimes let bad practices flourish. But even they are usually thankful if somebody points out bad management; they don't like losing money either, after all. And treating employees systematically unfairly is bad management because it makes people do their work badly, it makes them leave and recruiting new o…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:42 AM
0

It's not a stereotype but a fact that in wars and the like it's almost always men who do the fighting. That alone, if the number of violent encounters is counted, makes men hugely more violent. For every fight involving women there must have been hundreds of fights involving men throughout history. Or take childhood fights. Boys must fight, use violence against each other, perhaps dozens of times more than girls (who prefer psychological "violence"). What about the law enforcement? How many male…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:23 AM
3

Women are worse off. Thus most things that they strive for in the name of equality actually increase inequality by making the better-off gender even more better off. That's pretty fundamental.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 06:24 AM
2

That's what courts do. I suppose you don't think that what courts do is wrong.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 06:00 AM
1

My son asked my opinion about a career in teaching. I said that he should think twice because the attitudes are probably getting worse in the future. And there are, after all, all kinds of jobs where that particular risk doesn't exist. If he wanted to teach, he could concentrate on adults. But surely he could teach kids, too, if that's what he truly wanted, the risk isn't too great.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:06 AM
1

Men usually get what they want. Feminist fantasies are unbelievable! I truly wonder how somebody can take their sexist bullshit seriously.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:54 AM
9

When our ancestors started to walk upright "evolution made" women breasts that resemble buttocks which weren't as visible as earlier. The idea was, of course, to send a sexual signal. Apes don't have breasts the same way as women.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:34 AM
18

Sanity rule number three: Never take a feminist argument seriously.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 08:23 AM
-1

So? I just said that it's self evident that men commit violet acts more than women. Where those acts come from is a different question (and as always it's an interplay between biology and culture and nobody will ever know how it "really works").
/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:16 AM
-2

It's self-evident. Think about wars, violent crimes, defending others, bar brawls ... Women tend to be violent only against those they think won't strike back too hard if at all. And they are almost never demanded to commit institutionalized violence.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:02 PM
4

Whatever you say, it's evil to tell the more violent sex in relationships that it's okay and even funny to hurt boys and men. ¨ There was this TV show, the Talk, where women joked about a real-life castration a wife did to her husband and the audience laughed enthusiastically. Yes, many women tend to despise men and cherish occasionally the idea of hurting them. And they know that they can talk about their attitudes quite freely among other women. But if something is culturally accepted it doesn…
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:45 PM
-3

Isn't is quite obvious that men are more violent? DV is about fifty-fifty but outside homes men are more violent.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:47 PM
6

It's the sick attitude many feminists are spreading that is evil. When you joke about hurting boys and men the likelihood that somebody acts out will become greater.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:30 PM
1

Many girls and women want boys and men to be stoic rather than emotional. Men stabilize so that hetero relationships aren't as crazy and even violent as many lesbian relationships.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:08 PM
1

Boys end up stronger and smarter as adults and more critical.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:10 AM
0

Anybody who's not anti-feminist is, in my honest opinion, either ignorant, stupid, or morally corrupt. Otherwise it's impossible to understand how somebody could accept the lies, sexism, and aggression you find in, for example, Feminist textbooks.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:17 PM
2

Sexism is the blatant discrimination of women in the workplace or education system. Sexism is the blatant discrimination of women or men based on stereotypes. If you want to see what sexism against men looks like read Wikipedia's Sexism article. :) It's full of crazy feminist stereotypes (and lies and half-truths) about men and women. Or better still, don't read it because anger isn't a healthy emotion.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 10:45 AM
1

If boys are starting out school behind girls because they "lack basic language and communication skills," that suggests parental or environmental influence, or perhaps that girls are just better at these things naturally. Boys develop slower, an evolution biology thing most likely.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 07:37 AM
5

Or it could be that those authors whose books sell well are reviewed. In that case it could be about the Matthew effect. Or the fact that the best in almost everything that demands skill tend to be men. (Yes they are, even in stuff that women mostly do. Perhaps its a genetic thing or cultural but that's how it is.) Perhaps the topics men choose tend to have broader interest among the public. It could also be that the whole thing is a typical feminist fact meaning that it's not true.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 06:22 PM
5

I think that men don't like to read books written by modern women because there are so often misandrist themes in them. I know a male reviewer who almost always when reviewing a book by a female author had a passage starting with something like: this time the author has shown the stupidity/evilness/untrustworthiness of men by ... The last "female book" I read (halfway) told about a police academy. The heroine was a recruit who was treated like shit by many teachers and other recruits. I happen t…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 03:02 PM
2

Yeah, but that's not an "underlying imbalance". An underlying imbalance would mean that women's book were reviewed more.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 02:47 PM
1

Probably less than forty years because the birth rate would be dropping fast.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 10:02 AM
2

Before the Internet lying was so easy. Poor feminists. Yeah, they still lie but it's become harder and harder to find people stupid or ignorant enough to believe them.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 10:00 AM
8

Photographer, one more profession better left to women unless you are ready to take the risk of these kinds of thing happening.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 08:10 PM
15

An extremely narcissistic view: His, his OWN children happen to be girls, the ones he has made and loved more than anything happen to be one gender and not the other. So, he happens to know more about the problems girls face and he has much more deeper feelings for those problems. Because, you know, it's HIS children who face them. Never mind the boys. He don't know about them, don't have true, deep feelings for them and don't want to because, well, HIS children are girls. I know a Feminist who …
/r/MensRights05/08/16 04:53 AM
3

It should be pretty easy to determine whether circumcision is useful or not. That's because there is at least one quite wealthy nation, Israel, where pretty much everyone is circumcised and several nations where very few are (or used to be just a few decades ago). Furthermore, in the US circumcision is much more common than elsewhere, so, the benefits should be showing in the health statistics.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 11:20 AM
1

Unfortunately this can't the explanation, not the only one, in any case. In many (most?) western countries women won't get an alimony if there are no kids of his living with her. Nevertheless women tend to initiate more divorces.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 10:56 AM
1

Wouldn't a rational business owner stop hiring women or men depending on the branch. If you had just male workers, no woman could accuse you of discrimination. Or can dissatisfied employers refer to other firms and their wages?
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:51 AM
0

The Wikipedia article looks pretty balanced but it mentions nothing about cannibalistic females.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:45 AM
2

Then again when you see a clinically depressed (or schizophrenic) person even a layman can often tell after a while or right away that the person is not well. Of course there are cases when depression is so mild that it's not right to put them on the same spectrum with cases when the person, for example, doesn't care enough to visit the toilet. And even with broken arms there are borderline cases.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:31 AM
8

That's a good point. But we really don't know any exact percentages and never will.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 10:55 AM
256

‘I will treat you as a man inflicting this damage on his wife – very very severe injuries indeed.’ She was handed a two year jail sentence suspended for two years. So, the judge actually admits that the pussy pass exists. I thought it was a secret and something a judicial officer would never admit. But in the end he just couldn't treat her as a man, apparently, she walked, after all. Why? Did the code of treating women more lenient prevent him somehow or did he have a personal problem with treat…
/r/MensRights03/08/16 06:53 AM
1

why?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 06:17 PM
1

A feminist said on TV that misogyny is proven by the fact that every time, for example, the Guardian publishes something about women there's a bunch of angry men spreading hate in comments. She "forgot" to say that it happens only when the paper spreads feminist hatred first. But she got to say it without anybody challenging her obviously stupid and false allegation.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:58 PM
3

Women's cooperation takes place between friends, the small exclusive group I mentioned, and ends - often in in a very nasty manner - when the friendship ends. Men aren't as discriminatory. But laboratory tests have found the phenomenon, as well, over and over again. Men cooperate within a hierarchy more often than women and women are more "democratic". But men perform better if the competition isn't so much within the group but between us and them. Take a football team. It has a hierarchy but a …
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:08 PM
0

Boys and men tend to group into hierarchies and compete. Girls and women tend to form small exclusive groups and co-operate. Men have a stronger sexual drive (which has an enormous effect on the society because it creates a permanent and dynamic imbalance between the sexes).
/r/MensRights02/08/16 01:11 PM
1

The guy talks mostly about externalities but don't understand it. If you wanted to suggest that marriage is good for men, you should talk about why it makes their lives better, not how it helps the society or wives and children (who don't usually exist when a marriage is considered).
/r/MensRights02/08/16 12:59 PM
2

Rape XL and rape lite?
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:28 AM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisher%27s_principle
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:24 AM
1

Exactly what I thought but forgot to write down.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:17 AM
3

Could it be that because women spend several times more than men they are morel likely to give money to charity, too. Buying new shoes makes them happy, so does helping others. Most men don't love spending the same way. Women's relationship to money is indeed different.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:45 AM
0

A young man has never had sex and he thinks that he's too interested in sexy women and porn and strip clubs and what not. He thinks he's wasting his time because instead of hanging around in bars or watching porn he could, for example, become better in his profession or become a master of a new skill. He could become wealthier and more confident. If this man asked the doctor for a chemical castration, should he be given the medicine? That was my point.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:03 AM
6

It's going to be more men raping men and boys if anything. Female rapists as a recurring theme is too far out for any conventional producer of entertainment.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:24 AM
4

I wonder if the juries and judges are taught at some point that women very often blame men in order to get more lenient convictions. They should be told, otherwise the trick works.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 05:04 AM
38

Feminism has changed my view on people and the society. An important political movement can lie aggressively for decades and nobody cares because the narrative is lucrative: men are bad, women need to be protected.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 08:51 AM
2

All differences between men an womyn are social constructs.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 03:29 PM
3

The middle-aged white guys aren't fair game after all, well, not always anyway.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:03 PM
2

He saw a damsel in distress and decided that the best way to help her and fight the villain Depp was to pretend that he's involved with the damsel?
/r/MensRights31/07/16 11:56 AM
1

The most privileged people are wives of rich men who can do whatever good things, they want to do knowing that money just keeps flowing. You know, doing good makes you feel good and you feel even better if you can do it without any real accountability. You fly to your Monaco home and settle by the pool, pick your iPad and give a million to the poor girls of the world, do a bit swimming, get ready for a night in the casino, lose million, and before flying to your Hong Kong home make yourself feel…
/r/MensRights30/07/16 06:12 PM
12

lol
/r/MensRights30/07/16 05:48 PM
4

I was very careful not to say anything about rape fantasies but you sort of ruined it. ¨ To be clear, I'm sure that women don't want to be raped. And I don't think that any man can read the signs so wrong that he rapes somebody by accident (unless insane or heavily intoxicated). What these scenes describe is perhaps the will to remain "pure" and transfer the quilt to the man. Or the lust for strong dominating men that women clearly have. Or both.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 01:10 PM
8

This is a theme you find in hundreds or thousands of books that women have written for women: woman says no to man's advances but the man doesn't care and kisses or even takes her anyway - gently but manly - and in the end they fall madly in love. Just saying. No seems to mean YES!!!!! in certain kind of romantic literature. What you don't find in books is men wanting their cars to be stolen by women. This scene doesn't seem to have any artistic value or psychological ambiguity. But, hey, the re…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:55 AM
3

Were boys doing better? If they were, one obvious explanation is that back then boys had educated male figures to look up to. Nowadays there is often just women. This could be, by the way, studied pretty easily: are boys doing worse if all their teachers are female. But that wouldn't be PC I suppose.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:41 AM
6

The article has feminist undertones and dismisses the possibility that boys are actually treated worse than girls by their parents. We know that teachers do, why not then parents? And there are studies indicating that parents tend to care less about the education of boys, at least in working-class families.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 04:36 AM
1

Why do we see so few Feminists spreading this kinds of sexist hatred, that it's men as a class who are responsible for terrorism? It looks so perfectly normal view. My guess is that it's for the same reason why Hitler and Himmler kept the final solution secret. Feminists know that most women don't like their aggressive hatred towards men.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:07 AM
1

I there a myth somewhere that inflation has caused wages to drop?!
/r/MensRights22/07/16 04:43 AM
1

Yes, but the black job market welcomes Americans in many places. At least in the 90s there lots of American kids working without permits in Greece and other Mediterranean countries as waiters, bartenders, shills, bouncers, surfing instructors and so forth. I did it myself for one tourist season. A local girl fell in love with me and for a short while I thought about staying for good.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 07:49 AM
1

Berlin or the Greek Islands come to mind. Both are cheap and pretty international. Berlin is in the middle of Europe, Greek has a wonderful climate.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 06:41 AM
3

Americans cann't just decide to settle in Switzerland unless they are multimillionaires and even the they have to negotiate with the government about tax rates and such.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter