TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bl_rp Archive

View 15 posts and 143 comments by Bl_rp on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
162

GeneralBl_rp/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:06 PM
121

Edu./Occu.Bl_rp/r/MensRights16/04/16 03:54 AM
31

GeneralBl_rp/r/MensRights23/02/18 06:35 PM
23

Bl_rp/r/MensRights17/02/17 10:33 AM
17

Bl_rp/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:05 AM
15

Bl_rp/r/MensRights05/10/16 11:16 PM
10

Edu./Occu.Bl_rp/r/MensRights23/05/18 12:42 PM
8

DiscriminationBl_rp/r/MensRights09/12/15 03:51 AM
6

Social IssuesBl_rp/r/MensRights07/06/16 08:46 PM
4

Bl_rp/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:52 AM
3

Social IssuesBl_rp/r/MensRights03/09/16 02:22 PM
3

Bl_rp/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:03 AM
1

Bl_rp/r/MensRights05/08/16 11:09 AM
0

GeneralBl_rp/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:40 AM
0

Bl_rp/r/MensRights17/08/16 05:40 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Also noteworthy, from the same paragraph: apparently this was a thing "all over the world".
/r/MensRights24/02/18 12:03 AM
6

"shoemaker, a butcher, or even a porter" - sounds like basically anyone living in a city, doesn't it? What trade would a free man have except farmer or farmhand that pays substantially less?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 11:26 PM
1

Do women & Islam next.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:13 AM
3

Well there ya go, the dumbest thing on the internet right now. I didn't think I could be shocked by stupidity at this point, but god damn.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 07:56 PM
1

because we aren't generating a theory for the MRM Well that's half of it. If we could actually effect some real change in the world, that'd be cool too. We could organize activism campaigns through the sub.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:35 PM
0

You are just totally lost inside your own head at this point. I hope you make it out of there.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:29 PM
0

No Darling Concern & Control Troll, you are not an engaged activist I never said that. If you don't have the coherency of mind to understand basic communication, why do you bother coming here to argue? What good can possibly come of it?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 05:10 PM
0

Again with the hypocrisy. You are the only one concerned with controlling the perception of 'we', you authoritarian dipshit. You are your own worst example of a supposed engaged activist! No, I am your worst example of an engaged activist, because you disagree with me, whereas I do not. Get how that works? I agree with myself, you agree with yourself, and we disagree with each other. Are you grasping the concept?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:33 PM
1

Keep telling the disabled guy he's a retard! Playing the victim card now, huh? I don't give a fuck that you're disabled. You are stupid, incoherent, dishonest, smarmy, and conceited.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:25 PM
1

So you like one sub because it's narrow and narrow-minded, and you can't handle another that is wide, diverse, open and not as judgmental as you? You made all that up. ... and then you try to turn what you don't like into what you do like That's a bit of a simplification but it's not like I've come to expect you to be honest and nuanced. not by example I've already refuted that elsewhere in this very comment section, but I see that you feel perfectly comfortable blathering on despite that. but b…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:21 PM
1

Wow, you managed to read all that out of me not knowing what it means to have "bad piles". That's a special level of retarded. Not to mention hypocritical. You call me sloppy but you can't spell that word. You sound like an incoherent blithering retard while criticizing me for not being articulate. Half of the shit you say is pulled right out of your ass and the other half is basically a meaningless word soup. Lacking aggregate? Concretizing fallacies? Eat shit. I'd say you're a troll but it sou…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:06 PM
1

I don't know what that means.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:38 PM
1

"ur post is bad and not good" That's very compelling. If that's all you have, then why are you wasting your time here instead of doing something useful like spamming shitty links for fat karma bucks?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:33 PM
1

You should go back and look more closely and their insularity - lack of academic diversity - adherence to narrow world views - demands for redpill purity and that their theocracy may not be questioned. I will. For now all I can say is that I have found what I have seen of their theory to be interesting and provocative. The problem I have with r/mensrights is that I don't see much of that in here. I have a problem with the existence, but rather the abundance and popularity of "hey look at this" p…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:20 PM
1

I detected that you [...] fail in your attempts to be Ironic! Nice. You try to deny your astounding idiocy but you still don't even understand what I was saying. I wasn't even trying to be ironic. I picked the first bad analogy I could come up with in order to demonstrate - as I then spelled out very clearly - that it's far from a nitpick to refuse to accept an analogy as a substantive argument. If you understood that that's all I was trying to do, you wouldn't have said this: Thow emotive image…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 03:05 PM
1

No Darling - it's the correct course of action when dealing with a Time Waster. Thow emotive images about all you like... it just makes you look more troll and feminut as you dig that hole! Haha. Damn. You actually thought I stated that analogy as a sincere belief. I've been sitting here for 10 minutes trying to come up with something to say, but it's just too dumb to address. To save yourself future humiliation, try reading comments in their entirety before responding. Shouldn't be that hard wh…
/r/MensRights21/04/17 02:51 PM
0

You walking away from this conversation is like Stalin banning all dissent against his regime. That's an analogy. Would it be nitpicking to point out that an analogy does not constitute an argument, or that I have no other arguments to support it?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:42 PM
1

You present an analogy, but no arguments to support its validity, whereas the comment you're responding to contains several arguments against it.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:29 PM
2

I wasn't calling you a concern troll I know. It's a valid term though, because we have recently had an influx of visitors to this sub whose one and only post here ever is to complain that the posts here aren't to their liking. That's the very definition of a concern troll. No, a concern troll is someone who pretends to be on the other side in order to distract, derail, and undermine morale with fake concerns. It's all about intention. Reading, not writing posts, is what qualifies you to comment …
/r/MensRights21/04/17 01:16 PM
2

"Concern troll" has its legitimate uses, but I find it's mostly a convenient way to shut down conversations. I do my part by posting things whenever I have something to say or something worth linking, and not posting when I do not. Would my concerns be less valid if I were not as good at writing or finding interesting content? I don't advocate changing the sub through moderation policy, by the way.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 12:22 PM
1

So about that thing
/r/MensRights09/03/17 02:21 PM
1

Pretty sure she didn't.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 01:51 AM
1

Thanks for the response! Well, I've already tried and I didn't find the study immediately, and what with me being busy and not having time for it and/or being a lazy piece of shit who expects others to do my work for me, I'm not gonna spend more time looking for it. But if you wanna do it, that'd be neat as fuck.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 04:51 PM
1

Hey, that's just crazy enough to work! Paging u/girlwriteswhat Now let's see if she notices this or if it gets drowned out among the other gazillion messages she maybe gets daily from her 150k subs.
/r/MensRights17/02/17 08:01 PM
5

Honor killings do not happen to men https://media.tenor.co/images/8a4a99d3bd67ba8d9a025c36edf4a624/tenor.gif You're not a good MRA if you just go along with the mainstream narrative of primary or exclusive female victimization. I mean it's fine to not know every single area where that narrative is incorrect, but you have to be aware of what you know and what you don't, rather than loudly and confidently asserting your ignorance as though it were knowledge and then drawing all these far-reaching …
/r/MensRights03/02/17 02:41 AM
1

dindu nuffin
/r/MensRights16/01/17 12:54 PM
7

It's about the documentary The Red Pill which is about the MRM, not /r/theredpill
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:01 PM
1

wow that sure is a big pen
/r/MensRights20/10/16 12:51 PM
1

...penis?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:38 AM
-1

At least he's not "fucking a white male".
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:29 PM
1

I haven't watched too much other MRM stuff on youtube, but here are some channels I know of: Alison Tieman Hannah Wallen Honey Badger Radio which is hosted by the former two and Karen Straughan Paul Elam who runs A Voice for Men Barbarossa Stardusk ManWomanMyth was a youtube channel which has been taken down. I've heard much praise about it though. Here's a torrent of the "complete series" so it appears you're supposed to watch the videos in order. Here's also a mirror channel which appears to c…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:50 AM
2

part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQM77va9Y3U 150526 On men, women and r/TheRedPill Men do not & have never & cannot hate women. Rival cultures say the other is misogynistic. Men say men of past generations are misogynistic. Women's power to harm men & most women say nothing about it until men in their own lives get harmed by it. Manosphere infighting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2k86AaMfAY 150714 Why do MRAs attack feminism? Feminist theories harm men. Feminism is data-impervious. Dul…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:31 AM
2

As requested by trampson, here's the list in successive comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA 111104 Feminism and the Disposable Male Women's well-being seen as more important than men's. Cause: women were the reproductive bottleneck. Women intrinsically valuable; men disposable & derive value from being useful to women. Male disposability exploited by feminism. In the past: men expected to & celebrated for self-sacrifice. Now: men expected to self-sacrifice but only get contempt…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:27 AM
1

I don't really see the need for that though. It's all there in one place already.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:58 AM
1

Interesting that they deleted it well after it had left the frontpage.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 11:53 AM
2

Seems like kind of an asshole move if your workplace is decent, though.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:40 AM
3

By that standard we'd sticky like at least a fourth of all posts.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:27 PM
2

Yeah but they could just ignore that.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 02:33 PM
5

This was around the time feminists started fighting against male DV victims (see Erin Pizzey).
/r/MensRights30/08/16 08:23 PM
4

Half of them would probably be from Karen.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:06 PM
13

So if a middle-aged woman goes back to college and then starts dating her middle-aged teacher, he's committing a crime? Or is the AU age of consent more of an "age of sometimes consent but if we think it's weird we can arbitrarily revoke it" type thing? I agree that it's abuse of power and the teacher should be fired, but either she's an adult capable of consent or she isn't.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:12 PM
2

some rapper nobody says men r bad "sweden officially sez men r bad"
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:15 AM
89

So... he didn't commit a crime? Also pretty weird how OP says "almost 2 years" yet the article title says "3 years" and the article text says "3 years 9 months".
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:01 AM
1

I really don't agree. Many feminists use these motte & bailey strategies where they say a bunch of ridiculous shit and then when they're criticized, they retreat to "no no no, feminism is just about equality", and they point to feminism's supposedly glorious past where they made wife battery illegal, got women the vote etc. If we tear down that image of feminism's past by showing people that it was rotten to the core the whole time, they have nowhere to retreat to. To OP: fuck yes, do it!
/r/MensRights21/08/16 03:00 PM
1

Yeah.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:38 AM
0

Declarative statements? That's my favourite thing!
/r/MensRights17/08/16 11:03 PM
0

unconsciousness due to intoxication invalidates consent. If this were not the case, then people like Brock Turner would not be convicted of any crime. False dichotomy. "Either unconsciousness always invalidates consent, or it never does". Brock Turner fucked an unconscious woman. Perhaps she consented until she fell unconscious, but after that point he kept going. Amy Schumer passively got fucked by a guy who repeatedly nodded off for seconds at a time and then woke up and kept going while she j…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 08:52 PM
0

I guess you missed this part: (By the way, I'm not a legal expert and I don't know if what she did can legally be considered a crime. I'm talking about what I think ought to be the standard.) Yeah, he was pretty drunk. He was also the initiator and active party during the sex. You're not making a case for why X should be more important than Y. You're outright dismissing my points now instead of ignoring them. I don't think anything of value can come from continuing this conversation.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:26 PM
0

Well, you state your opinion but you don't really argue for it or counterargue any of my points, so here's my response: nah
/r/MensRights17/08/16 05:06 PM
1

"you disagree with me so maybe you're a rapist" Oh man. You actually managed to be worse than the feminists who call people "rape supporters". Good fucking job, buddy. What's next, I eat babies because I disagree with your opinion on the best pizza toppings? Get the fuck out of here.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:54 PM
1

However, there are two very important points that you are missing. I'm not. I addressed the double standard. One gender is treated like shit in these cases and the other is treated fairly. I want to make it so everyone is treated fairly. You want everyone to be treated like shit. You want more innocent people to go to jail, instead of less. Let's see - "we are too hard on rape", "these sexual encounters aren't rape, these women were willing, just drunk and passing out". Or maybe we shouldn't mak…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:41 PM
0

Yeah I guess it is, if you ignore everything I said. As far as I can tell, Brock Turner initiated sexual intercourse with an unconscious woman. Amy Schumer allowed a guy to initiate sexual intercourse with her.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 01:44 PM
10

Oh no, one guy said something you disagreed with and got downvoted to oblivion. Better find somewhere where they don't allow diverse opinions. r slash feminism, perhaps?
/r/MensRights13/08/16 12:53 PM
21

Can help it. Won't.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:37 AM
3

Intersectionality is feminism's appropriation of other groups' struggles, cranked up to 11. Let's not go there. Gay intimate partner violence is ignored just like female-on-male violence. The fact that racial profiling of black drivers is an issue of "driving while black and male" and not "driving while black", and the fact that black men are oftentimes served better by ending discrimination against men than against blacks - for example, the many times larger prison sentencing gap for men than f…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:35 AM
1

I appreciate your perspective, though I don't agree with all of it. In the general public, any perspective that is seen as the least bit unfair to women makes everyone uncomfortable. I suspect that the same problem exists to not a small extent in MR circles. The main difference is that the standard for what is considered unfair is massively shifted because of all the facts that have informed their MR perspective. I don't know much about MGTOW stuff but it seems like most of it is a lot harder to…
/r/MensRights08/07/16 01:04 AM
1

I haven't met any otherkin. If I did, I wouldn't hesitate to share my opinion on otherkin were it brought up, but I also wouldn't make an effort to confront them about it for no reason. They do me no harm, but they might be harming themselves by persisting in their delusion, and if so then we should figure out the best way to treat them in accordance with science. Or perhaps there's no need for treatment because it's no more harmful to the individual than religion. If gender binary is only as re…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:13 AM
1

I don't mind this being addressed but I'd just like to note that it's kinda weird that half the commenters seem to have the impression that I asked in OP "how many sexes are there?". As for gender, I don't know what the definition should be. I think the approach should be to look at what the actual concrete scientific evidence (which I had hoped to see more of in this thread) says about gender binary vs spectrum and then go from there.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:55 AM
1

There's plenty of scientific evidence to support the notion that homosexuality, bisexuality and transgenderism are real phenomena in ways that, say, otherkin are not. If there's such a thing as a nonbinary gender identity, science should bear that out as well.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 03:28 AM
1

link
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:19 PM
31

LACIGREENRAPEDME
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:19 AM
5

Gender-neutral bathrooms with a men's only urinal area.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:12 AM
30

Is that nonconsensual hugging I see? Back off, you vile rapist!
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:11 PM
1

I've been here a couple minutes and my initial impression is that you are basically radfems. You see those rules in the sidebar? Let me rephrase them for you: We will allow no: Dissent Pretty much all feminist subreddits will ban anyone who questions their narrative. It sounds like you do much the same. Also, here's something interesting I saw in this very thread: Every attack has resulted in destruction of the attacking party (Matt Forney, Angelo John Gage, etc) Typical radfem stuff. Someone sp…
/r/MGTOW18/04/16 09:47 PM
2

A couple simple principles: 1) No one should have more or less legal rights or responsibilities based solely on their gender. If men should have to register, then so should women. 2) No one should face higher or lower requirements to get hired to a job based on their gender. This means a person should be allowed to serve in direct combat roles if and only if they meet the requirements, which should not depend on gender. Currently, women do have lower standards for getting into direct combat role…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:16 PM
1

If you wanna know people's opinions, try reading some of the 48 comments in this thread.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 02:54 PM
3

I'm pretty sure they would, yeah. Women are the bottlenecks of reproduction, and this was a really big deal in the time of hunter-gatherers, so men have evolved to be protective of women. It ties in with male disposability; here's a classic video on the subject.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 12:58 PM
1

So you do agree with me. Great. Glad we have that sorted out.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:55 AM
0

So hold women to the male standard. Make them take the male PFT. So... you're agreeing with me? You can't have it both ways. Either you think men and women should have the same standards, or you think they should have different standards. Either you agree with me, or you disagree and argue against my actual, stated position, rather than arguing against something I did not say or think. Read this paragraph again, and read it carefully. All I'm saying is, if the experts have convened and analyzed …
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:34 AM
1

I coulda swore you were just saying women should be held to the male standard. If they're less capable, they need to have different physical fitness standards. Why? All I'm saying is, if the experts have convened and analyzed the situation, and they have come to the conclusion that the overall effectiveness of the military is served best by having the requirements of X strength, Y endurance and Z gun accuracy for a certain role A, and someone applies to A who has at least X strength, Y endurance…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 10:13 AM
-1

So... you're agreeing with me?
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:52 AM
3

Huh? Are you saying MRAs are concerned with upholding male privileges? Because that is the very opposite of true. I don't see why more women on the battlefield is a good thing. I am not concerned with equality of outcome like the feminists who whine about the glass ceiling. I am concerned with equality of opportunity and optimal outcomes, meaning women should have the same physical requirements as men, and also that women should serve in all-female squads rather than mixing the genders because m…
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:45 AM
-1

By virtue of being a woman, you're already weaker and slower than your male counterparts. Uh. What. So if we compare a man and a woman of equal ability, the woman is less able? Seems rather contradictory. It makes no sense to compare the average man and woman in response to "men and women should have the same requirements".
/r/MensRights16/04/16 09:30 AM
3

The problem is that men's instincts to protect women will compromise their ability to make good decisions and prioritize the mission. Though I guess all-female squads would be fine, as long as they have the same physical requirements as men.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:19 AM
2

I haven't read the report, but the article says so: The tests come with at least one important caveat: As the Marine Corps Times notes, many of of the male study participants had previously served in combat units, whereas female participants, by necessity, came directly from infantry schools or from noncombat jobs.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:13 AM
3

Well, did he threaten to do something illegal? Otherwise it's a shitty thing to do but not rape.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:43 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 06:02 PM
2

One of the major Swedish newspapers: More young people should be like EliSophie (archive link)
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:56 PM
1

I've seen plenty of despicable shit on facebook by acquaintances who don't display any of that in person and who I get along with just fine. I've even seen both men and women share blog posts that explicitly say "I hate men", but you couldn't tell that by their appearance or behaviour.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 05:48 PM
-2

Not sure I agree about this. I think that in order to fire someone for their opinions, you should have a pretty strong reason to believe that they might mistreat a customer (or coworker) based on that opinion. Mocking some men who act in a certain way (EDIT: specifically, mocking men online for their behaviour in situations that are not relevant to her profession), or not caring about men's issues, is not a very "out there" view, and doesn't really tell you much about how they behave towards men…
/r/MensRights11/04/16 02:03 PM
8

Are they also divided on whether infants can lose a part of their anatomy through surgery?
/r/MensRights03/04/16 01:16 AM
3

The one original thing he said that I haven't heard in a billion other places is that the wage gap can't be 23% because all employers would overwhelmingly hire women so they could pay them less.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:43 PM
1

It does include Jill Stein, according to this 2012 source. "Women are still being paid far less."
/r/MensRights01/04/16 04:31 PM
2

So this has a decent chance of reaching 10k and yet they couldn't bother to Capitalize their shit.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:31 PM
5

Sexual objectification of women as a problem is a feminist idea.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 12:09 PM
12

I think he meant to point out some more ways in which the system can be abused.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:46 PM
132

A man can make sure to use a condom. A woman can take pills, or make sure to use a condom, or take the day after pill, or abort, or give the baby up for adoption. In USA, she can also leave the child to the state (safe haven laws) - does this exist anywhere else? Regardless, a woman who doesn't want a baby won't have a baby. It's 100% her choice. There is no excuse to extort money from a man to support her free choice. It's a sick and disgusting practice.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 09:43 AM
5

It is. The better we understand every aspect of the gender social dynamic, the better we can combat the feminist narrative. In particular, if we have a solid understanding of women's place in society and what is and isn't a women's issue, we can more effectively refute those who try to hijack human issues for women, as well as those who claim that society as a whole favors men over women.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:06 AM
1

Did you read the OP?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:05 AM
3

Indignation and contempt is every SJW's idea of humor.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:50 AM
1

Wow, you sure are a stupid piece of shit huh buddy. I understand why you're angry - your inability to comprehend anything about anything must be pretty frustrating. But hey, at least you can throw insults around like a monkey flinging poop. Don't worry, we're not here to take away your bananas. But we do notice that you come across like a neanderthal with Down syndrome, except less clever. So I'd just like to give you some advice to help you with that. If you find yourself repeatedly bashing you…
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/16 12:04 AM
4

Haha oh wow, so you're right because people agree with you. Oh and also because I'm not a mod. I guess as long as you don't have to change your mind it doesn't matter how shitty the justification is.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/16 09:44 PM
6

Yeah, but "pussy pass denied" is not the same as "pussy pass not received". Otherwise literally every court sentence of a woman who doesn't get off easy would be a PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/16 08:11 PM
1

This has been a problem for quite some time now.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/16 08:04 PM
12

Yeah but she wasn't trying to use her gender in order to get a pass.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/16 07:58 PM
1

Ah, so you are just mentally incapable of grasping the concept of "innocent until proven guilty". That explains it. Let me ask you: should there be a conviction literally every time someone commits a crime? Like, every time A accuses B, either A or B gets sentenced? Because that's exactly what you're implying, and that's also a good way to increase the prison population by a factor of ten. if your goal is to convince me that without a shred of evidence but much to the contrary that someone can s…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:25 PM
1

you picky bastard
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:47 PM
1

Of course there could be no evidence. Google "learned helplessness". What are you not getting about the second part? I was as clear as I possibly could. Jesus Fucking Christ, is it just absolutely impossible to convince someone of your point of view on the internet? The one time I am absolutely certain that the case is absolutely ironclad and there's no fucking way they can conjure up some wiggle room for doubt even if they sell their soul and sacrifice a million goats. I don't know why the fuck…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:40 PM
1

In Sweden (age of consent 15) we don't consider it a crime if it is clear that the sexual act did not amount to abuse based on small age difference, and it's been applied to a 17-year-old banging a 14-year-old in the supreme court. Still kinda disturbing that there's no law establishing officially allowed age differences, because that means there's no limit (besides 15) for when you can be taken to court, even if legal precedent establishes that you should be fine. Also it kinda sounds like the …
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:40 PM
2

Huh? I'm going to assume you meant "innocent until proven guilty". I think your error is that you attempted to apply formal logic to the situation. A says B did X, B is innocent until proven guilty, B fails to be proven guilty, B is thus innocent, thus B did not do X, thus A lied. But it works both ways. B has not been proven innocent, but merely not proven guilty. A is innocent until proven guilty of lying. I'll break it down: A claims B did crime X. Thus B has potentially committed crime X, an…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 10:25 PM
-2

To say "you should have evidence of x" is not sufficient to prove that x didn't happen. It wouldn't hold up in any court, nor should it.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 08:31 PM
2

And if we burned all men, no man would be on trial for sexual assault! #burnallmen
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:29 PM
3

I'd say as it stands the best tag for undecided allegations is probably "social issues" or "legal rights" depending on whether it's about medial or legal unfairness.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:26 PM
18

Guys, come on. Can we just stop using the "false accusation" tag about accusations that are not proven false? Actually, that tag should just be changed to "accusation". Let's not be biased towards calling accusers liars any more than we are towards calling the accused rapists.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 05:36 PM
9

So if I lock someone up in my basement for a decade and then free them, I can count on getting off scot-free because the statute of limitations has run out, right? Total and utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:03 AM
0

There's a difference between believing absurd but unverifiable things about the nature of reality (gods), or believing in things that can only be falsified by applying reason or trusting scientific authority (creationism), and things whose falsehood are intuitively obvious to anyone who interacts with humans or just knows anything about anything (literally every single human male from now until the end of time would behave in this particular way in this given situation). And yeah, obviously he m…
/r/MensRights13/01/16 12:21 AM
-1

Nah, you're just wrong.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:25 PM
0

See my other reply. As for the specific quote you gave, it just means that he thinks men's only evolutionary purpose is to protect women.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:56 PM
-1

Well first of all I don't see how you could possibly interpret "man" as "literally every single man". And what detail? Nothing about that comment suggests your interpretation. But more importantly, that would be such a ridiculous thing for anyone to believe. No social behaviour is absolutely 100.0000000000% universal, and there's just no fucking way anyone could go through life and interact with people and believe that, unless they went through some serious brainwashing. Let alone a behaviour th…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:49 PM
-2

The only good argument she has is the one about men protecting women at the expense of the mission, but it's a good point. How many should die for the privilege to serve of the few women who measure up? Does anyone have a source for the 3x casualties of integrated units in the IDF? About the height and jumping thing, if that's not a part of the physical requirements yet is important, then we should change the requirements. That's not an argument against tall women serving.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 02:21 AM
-4

Do you honestly think that he thinks literally every man would risk their lives for a woman? No, of course you don't, because your brain cells don't number in the single digits. You're being deliberately obtuse. He didn't mean all men and he didn't mean at least one man. He meant a significant amount of men. As you're well aware.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:49 AM
11

Literally no one has ever disputed this. It's about how often it happens, and about how many lives will be lost.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:31 PM
71

True. Also, obviously in some cases one of the parents is unfit to contact their child, and it's kinda weird that the petition doesn't mention that.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 06:15 PM
2

I guess it doesn't explicitly say women are paid 23 % less for the same work (or I wasn't paying close enough attention), but it still says it's a gap we need to "close", which I guess means we either need to pay women more for the same work or remove freedom of choice. Boo. Also I suspect that female models are earning more because they generate more revenue for their employers, i.e. it's the same system by which actors and sportsfolks get paid, and it seems like a fair system to me. Also, I do…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:47 PM
-5

To be fair, the tattoo artist is kind of a judgmental pompous self-righteous twat.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/16 04:05 PM
56

It would probably be best to let them handle it. If they choose to distance themselves or their kids from the (c)aunt or somehow manage to talk sense into her, great. If not, that's their prerogative as parents, and all you can really do is either refuse to babysit or ask for assurance that the aunt will not be able to storm in like that when you do. I don't think there's any legal risk; if the parents still feel comfortable asking you to babysit they're not shortly thereafter gonna swallow the …
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:12 PM
10

I love Sanders, but this is by far the worst thing about him. Whoever operates his facebook page is constantly spewing this garbage. Hopefully he'll tone down that rhetoric if he gets past the primaries and doesn't have to face a woman.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 11:35 PM
1

I disagree that the second one is not discrimination. If you have to wait for equipment as a woman the wait time will be the minimum of the time until stuff becomes available in the women's section and the time until stuff becomes available in the main gym, which is less or equal to the time men have to wait, and on average the wait time will be strictly less. Also, what if a guy wants to have a section without women? Fuck market research; they only deal with what's profitable. If one guy wants …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:35 PM
1

Your argument sounds like something racist people(or racist apologists) in the 40's would use to justify racial segregation. So? You use the word 'the', which is a word also used by neo-nazis when they make speeches justifying genocide. They also breathe air and brush their teeth, which is something you probably do as well. A superficial similarity is not an argument. It is true, by the way, that black people do, at the moment, behave slightly differently than white people on average because of …
/r/MensRights09/12/15 10:51 PM
1

Yeah, the current state of things is unfair and we all know it, but that's not the point. We need to have an idea about how things should be if we want to change how things are.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 11:42 AM
1

When you don't have anything to say, you can choose to not make a post instead of taking a dump on your keyboard and posting it.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 12:06 AM
1

Seriously? You commit literally the most basic of all logical flaws, and you're presenting it like it's sound reasoning with absolute confidence. Fucking wow. I don't know what the hell they taught you at Jedi school, but it doesn't seem to have helped you.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 11:59 PM
1

Because despite the way too high number of barbarian ISIS-type fuckheads like you, smarter people have made sure we progress beyond the dark ages.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 09:17 PM
1

Not all sarcastic comments are obviously sarcastic. What you said isn't even that far removed from what one might expect to see in a place like this. Not to say that MRAs are all raging misogynists, but there are certainly guys here and there who let bitterness cloud their thinking sometimes.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 06:10 PM
1

Not all women, lawyers, judges and juries are competely evil and horrible.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:25 PM
0

get out
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:22 PM
3

no
/r/MensRights04/12/15 03:21 PM
20

The audio is problematic.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/15 07:57 PM
2

Apparently I'm not the only one who immediately thought of this
/r/MensRights02/12/15 03:02 PM
2

She may have had it coming, but if I went out with someone and they left like that, I'd refuse to pay for them. They bought food from the restaurant and then committed a crime by leaving without paying. If someone steals something from a store, you don't demand that someone else pays for it; you just report the crime. (edit: I would of course pay for my own shit)
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/15 09:29 AM
1

I see no reason to believe gender symmetry wouldn't be true in colleges as it is elsewhere.
/r/MensRights26/11/15 10:46 PM
-2

Oh, I get it. When you said she's willing to kill someone else you weren't talking about after she got out of jail. You had the same idea as that other idiot, that she was going to crash into him, shrug it off like it's nothing, and then go run over some more people. And while we're making up absurd scenarios, let's also assume that she held the controller to a doomsday device, and he had to kill her in order to save the world from total destruction. He wasn't just trying to kill her for petty r…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/15 12:47 PM
-1

I'll begoing up your mother's asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/15 12:09 AM
-1

It's a justifiable reason to defend himself with whatever means necessary, but that's not what he was doing. And he certainly wasn't defending anyone else. What, you think she's just gonna smash into him with full force and then drive off to run down some more people? Likely fucking story.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/15 11:42 PM
3

Lel, so asking them to explain their position is so very rude because they have explained it in other places before. And I guess those other explanations have covered all possible objections and follow-up questions in a way that literally every person would find satisfactory, so anyone who ever brings it up again shall have their tongue cut out.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:24 PM
10

Let's see what happens. Edit: unsurprising and boring result
/r/MensRights15/11/15 12:04 AM
-10

So you actually do believe that cops should be judge, jury and executioner. Fucking wow.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/15 10:28 AM
-19

Cops don't get a license to kill just because some deranged psycho puts them in danger. They may do what they must to defend themselves and others, but failing that, they don't get to be judge, jury and executioner, no matter how justified they think it is. not the woman trying to murder a cop Are you blind or retarded? Is your brain unable to process morality that is not black and white? I said she should be put in jail, and you conclude that I think she did nothing wrong. Amazing.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 11:42 AM
-20

This is fucked up. When he fired the shots it was far too late for those shots to avert or soften the collision. He was trying to kill her just because. Put the fucker in jail. And her too, of course.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/15 03:52 AM
1

It doesn't take a far right winger to notice the connection between the left wing and the ultra-PC/SJW/campus/women's studies kind of feminism. I don't have an issue being exposed to an alternative point of view. If however you totally disagree with that opinion then i'm not likely to give it much thought, or credibility. Uh, what? I think you meant to say something else.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 06:10 PM
1

I'm a Bernie supporter and in the US I'd be ultra left wing, but anyone who would spare him criticism when he deserves it is an imbecile. Also anyone who would dissociate with people just for having a different opinion is an imbecile. Being exposed to an alternative point of view is a good thing. If we had more of that we'd have a lot less of feminism. Also no. It's not. Did you even read the comments?
/r/MensRights09/11/15 01:20 PM
1

What's worse than a degenerate psycho? A degenerate psycho apologist.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:48 PM
7

Interesting. However, the funding of british NCRI tells a different story. See this article and this table. If we consider years of life lost (YLL) as the most important indicator of harm, and we divide it by the amount of funding, and we divide this number for breast cancer by the corresponding number for prostate cancer, we get 1.31, so breast cancer should have 31% higher funding than it has. However, both of those cancer types receive a ridiculous amount of spending compared to e.g. lung can…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter