TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Blackflag421 Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Blackflag421 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Seems more like something for /r/polyamory
/r/MensRights20/05/10 03:29 PM
1

People are pretty ridiculous sometimes.
/r/MensRights20/05/10 01:08 AM
1

Once one side has given the other something (like a ring) it becomes a contract that must be fulfilled by the other party. We can't say it's not a contract and that she can't try to claim damages if the engagement is broken off (and she suffered financial loss from that), and say it is a contract and thus she isn't entitled to keep the ring at the same time. Either it's a contract, or the ring is automatically a gift.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 09:07 PM
1

But they were engaged, which legally is seen as a contract to wed if one side is giving the other something in exchange for it. If they had just decided to get married without anything being exchanged, there would be no contract. Everything becomes legalities once money is involved ;p
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:41 PM
12

I should've clarified - take that position if they try to pressure you into it after you've made it clear you don't want him curcumcised, don't start there.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:30 PM
11

Make it clear you would be more than happy to sue them if they circumcise him without your permission. Ask your wife to not sign ANYTHING.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:04 PM
6

Followup to an earlier posting where there was no explanation of why she was keeping the ring, other than they both wanted the ring or the money. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/c4j8d/for_this_ring_i_thee_sue_if_the_bride_calls_off/
/r/MensRights18/05/10 06:15 AM
4

Comes down to a preponderance of the evidence. If she can prove she paid all the bills and expenses during that time and the only thing he bought was the ring and stuff for himself, then her story makes sense and she's entitled to the ring, or a cash equivalent. If she can't prove that, then it goes back to being the standard contract of "we marry, you get the ring."
/r/MensRights18/05/10 06:14 AM
2

Pennsylvania's having this huge scandal where judges got kickbacks for sending juveniles to (privately owned) detention facilities.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 05:17 AM
11

Shouldn't take long before they start extending "civil commitment" to other crimes, as politicians try to be "tough on crime" and "keep criminals off the street" to get elected and re-elected.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 06:42 PM
-1

I'm also EXTREMELY skeptical when a woman says she was raped. Personal anecdote: Friend of a friend once confided that she was "raped" and it had hurt her deeply, scared her off from men for awhile, etc. A couple weeks later it got brought up somehow, and it turns out her "rape" was that she didn't want to have sex, but never said no or tried to stop it in any way. She just went to some guy's house (that she met at a bar) and when she got there didn't want to have sex anymore but did anyway. Tha…
/r/MensRights15/05/10 07:36 PM
1

Their brains, yes. That's what makes them transgender after all, a male/female brain in the opposite gender body. However, science is currently unable to fully convert them to male/female with sex organs and everything. Surgery is a cosmetic fix, and they require hormone supplements to maintain the new appearance. In my personal experience, the few male to female transsexuals I've met I had guessed they used to be men (and it was later confirmed), due to retaining some male body characteristics.…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 01:35 AM
2

They either couldn't explain why, or they were Mormon and believed it was wrong because their religion says so. None are redditors, afaik.
/r/MensRights11/04/10 12:43 AM
5

I don't know, I don't empathize with others easily yet don't have "it feels wrong" as a reason for anything - if you read my post I was referring to most people I've known, not myself. I have no emotional "feelings" on this subject, so your last question is not applicable. It doesn't "feel" one way or the other.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 09:10 PM
7

How do I feel about them? I have no strong feelings one way or the other. I'll never understand going through gender reassignment, but that's because biologically you remain a heavily altered <insert gender here>. Most people I've known had a bit stronger response than boredatheist's, but couldn't explain it in any logical terms - just "it's wrong/feels wrong." Legally, as boredatheist said the law should be blind to gender, so it shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 08:05 PM
1

Your headline is quoting an entirely different article than what you linked to. The article also isn't related to men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:52 AM
12

It's not that it would be almost impossible to get a conviction, it's that the DA doesn't WANT to prosecute this. A confession is all the evidence you need in most cases to get a conviction.
/r/MensRights09/04/10 11:23 PM
1

That was a couple years ago and I don't know her anymore or if she's still doing that. Makes me glad I refused to have sex with her though since there's no way to tell if I'd picked it up then.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 10:40 PM
1

You can have an STD and still be a virgin (through coming in contact with blood/etc), so there's ALWAYS a risk. If a woman transmits it to a man and doesn't tell him/lies to him, then it's impossible for him to know. HPV is a very tricky virus, though IIRC it shouldn't be part of this issue since there's a vaccine for it. It also isn't like HIV which is guaranteed to cause issues later in life, it's associated with increased risk. Personal anecdote: I knew a woman who was very promiscuous, knew …
/r/MensRights07/04/10 09:50 PM
3

But LEGALLY it's ok, and she'll most likely get majority custody plus child support from it.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 05:41 PM
2

I was referring how it's legally ok for her to do that, not ethically/morally. If she admitted it ever at any point it's a confession, and plenty of people confess if confronted with conflicting stories when being questioned. Civil court relies on a preponderance of the evidence, but in order to pursue anything in this context it would still need to be illegal. Which this fraudulent activity isn't.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 12:41 AM
3

But what if he's been tested regularly and knows he's clean? Should it still be as heavy a punishment? What if he's also had a vasectomy and just didn't tell her? What if the condom breaks and he doesn't notice the second it happens? On the flip side, why is it completely ok for a woman to trick a man to get pregnant (even having sex with someone who is unconscious and never consented)? Shouldn't deliberately deceiving someone to have a child regardless of gender be fraud? I do agree that it sho…
/r/MensRights06/04/10 11:16 PM
12

24
/r/MensRights05/04/10 02:52 PM
37

The scary thing is how many people AGREED with her. Later in comments Eye (likely a MRA) shot holes in everything she said and the feminist responses were either brushing it off or ignoring the comments.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 09:52 PM
3

I fail to see how this relates to mensrights.
/r/MensRights04/04/10 09:27 PM
2

Scrolling through a few pages of wierdboobs/infinitelythirsting's posts, I haven't seen a single example you claim exists. If you're going to use a "case in point" example you need proof, typically in the form of linkage. In fact, to make a good argument you'd need to substantiate each point you make, because you can't assume everyone who reads your post has read and memorized every /r/mensrights thread and comments for the past few months. You're also asking them to disprove you first - burden …
/r/MensRights04/04/10 09:23 PM
1

It would reduce reciprocal violence, since without someone to initiate there is no retaliation.
/r/MensRights03/04/10 06:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter