TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Blackgod_Kurokami Archive

View 10 posts and 57 comments by Blackgod_Kurokami on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Go on Tinder with good photos and record what you get after 72 hours. The highest I’ve seen a guy get in 24 hours is at least 270, based on 1000 swipes 27% match ratio. A decent looking guy with get 20-25
/r/seduction14/07/22 10:01 AM
2

Idk if I’d say every but it is interesting to see how much it has grown. Where women always like this and just hiding it? If so how did evolution allow for this opposed to men
/r/seduction14/07/22 09:59 AM
1

All your field reports are obviously fake I already read some as entertainment. To this day you have 0 evidence for any of them which you could easily provide. Probs do you if anyone believes and pays for your coaching service. You don’t have to ask someone who is clearly not interested in you on a date that’s retarded and ironically a sign of bad social skills. This type of blue pill mindset is what get guys hurt. Have already experienced a girl lying and being a scumbag and it wasn’t even surp…
/r/seduction03/07/22 09:34 AM
0

I’m impressed with how dedicated this account is to putting up a front in order to sell their coaching service 🤣
/r/seduction03/07/22 09:27 AM
1

I rarely directly approach women. Most of my rejections are indirect from interacting with people at school and work. By indirect I mean if you’re around someone and they don’t talk to you much even after you start conversations with them you can conclude they aren’t interested. You would only have to ask them after you’ve passed the minimal steps. I wouldn’t know how many girls are interested in me as a whole for a fact because I’m not interested in most girls so when they do keep making the ef…
/r/seduction03/07/22 01:37 AM
1

You get 0 likes on Tinder?
/r/seduction03/07/22 12:07 AM
1

Nah that’s not the main reason. If that was the case then most straight women would just put you through are you crazy test. They want you to chemistry with them. It’s socialization, girlxgirl is not slut shamed. Gay men hook up easily as well even if the guy is bigger and stronger than them. The only other difference you could point towards is pregnancy but it’s pretty obvious imo that one group who isn’t open to casual sex happens to be the 1 group of the 4 that’s socialized into it
/r/seduction02/07/22 09:41 PM
1

Evidently not. I might not directly approach often but I have interacted with lots of women by now just from school and work. I’m 25, never had anyone I’m interested in show interest back. Not saying that I can’t improve my appearance but it’s pretty clear that currently the odds are so stacked that it’s not worth investing time hunting for women
/r/seduction02/07/22 07:18 PM
0

Nah. To articulate an attractive guy would get up to 100 in 3 days and a highly attractive 100+ in 1 day. And even when I was using the guy who got to 100 in 3 for an experiment it towards the end to get 1-2 matches with a girl I’d want and 1 of them unmatched soon after. And that’s just getting the match let alone meeting up and actually scoring haha. It’s hilarious I did a lesbian and gay experiment with 5-6/10 looking people. On the gay account I had 80 likes in under 2 hours with a verified …
/r/seduction02/07/22 07:16 PM
0

There’s no reason for me to approach. I get 3 likes on Tinder after 3 days and I only like maybe 1 out of every 50 women
/r/seduction02/07/22 06:20 PM
1

It’s simple really. Either you’re dealing with one of the minority of women who’ll fuck as easy as a guy or with most women who want to like you before they fuck so they “aren’t a slut”. In which case nothing except talking naturally is gonna work. If you can’t talk to them and hit it off the same way you’d do with a male friend it’s over
/r/seduction12/06/22 09:55 AM
2

Yeah idk what’s with this mental gymnastics it’s not that deep
/r/seduction11/06/22 09:22 AM
1

Right but this also raises a question. If they were into you to begin with why would you need to learn game opposed to just letting things play out naturally? It would seem to only make sense if it’s a girl who is neutral on your physical appearance rather stimulated from jump
/r/seduction09/06/22 09:30 AM
2

That’s actually the funny thing. I love resistance training so I’m gonna do it regardless of women but if more women were fit or the female version of being jacked (look up Alexa Pilling’s recent posts on Instagram for example) there would be a way better ratio of good looking girls. A girl with average face and great body would be worth it and then there’s a decent amount of girls with a good face but don’t put effort into making a good body
/r/seduction06/06/22 01:14 PM
3

65% of ppl are overweight so 35% left just off of that. If we’re nice and say 50% have a good face (not really) 17.5%. Cut that in half for above average body. Roughly 9%. Drops off really fast by statistical characteristics
/r/seduction06/06/22 11:41 AM
2

Finally another guy with some sense you’re 100% correct most women aren’t that attractive no matter where you go just like how most men aren’t. The fact the average guy thinks 30-50% of women are an 8/10 blows my mind people hardly have standards. But I guess that’s good for them from a certain pov guys like us are on hard mode. Especially me I can only go for whores I’ll never be able to talk my way into it. Given how time consuming looking for this niche type of woman is my strategy is just to…
/r/seduction06/06/22 10:12 AM
1

I’ve tried stuff like this
/r/seduction02/05/22 04:37 PM
0

Getting along with people
/r/seduction02/05/22 01:04 PM
-3

I thought it was obvious with my title but guess I’ll be more direct. Going on a date is a complete waste of time for me. We will not get along that well and thus she will not want sex even if I’m great looking
/r/seduction02/05/22 01:03 PM
1

Because girls are hot and we get somewhat desensitized to just one person
/r/seduction02/05/22 10:57 AM
1

Was gonna comment something similar lmao though gotta appreciate the way they turned it positive from a certain point of view
/r/seduction02/05/22 10:32 AM
2

You are correct this is mad cope lmao gotta appreciate the way they’ve twisted it into being positive though
/r/seduction02/05/22 10:30 AM
1

Lol I’m reading through more of these one in a million odds scenarios you’re purposing (I just mean the chance of running into an actress and pornstar around the same time) and it’s proving my point. There’s no game in these stories, your looks are your game. They were attracted to you from the start and all you had to do was talk to them. And judging from what other supposed info you shared about yourself it’s pretty obvious you aren’t average looking. In addition to how most ppl vastly overrat…
/r/seduction27/04/22 12:59 AM
0

Your looks is your game. Doesn’t really matter all you can do is keep up the numbers game and hope you win
/r/seduction26/04/22 10:47 PM
2

How do I have 0 evidence when I’m looking at who other people are with in person 24/7? Like I said this isn’t about getting just any girl. I agree that cold approach is better than OLD, dating apps to me are just a way to objectively measure your looks range. Judging by who ppl are with it shows almost all the time your looks level is your limit. And given that the vast majority of guys report no success in cold approach (and even warm approach having a high rejection rate) it highlights that ev…
/r/seduction26/04/22 10:38 AM
-4

I mean even if I assume this is real it doesn’t disapprove my theories unless he shows photos of them naked kissing and he’s a 5 and she’s an 8 and I assume that is real as well. Then I would have to see this be repeated on a consistent basis THEN we can talk about “game”. Bc at it stands I just think I’m hearing about a guy who eventually got lucky with a girl around his looks range. Of course we aren’t gonna have a 100% failure rate, especially when if you’re a 6/10. But fact is that the major…
/r/seduction26/04/22 01:53 AM
1

It’s called lookism
/r/RedPillWomen27/10/21 10:47 AM
2

I’d be more shocked if it said 50% or so. It’s based on the US btw so idk about globally. You can Google it I forgot exactly how I found it, I searched it up after watching a video from someone called Vaush on YouTube. If you YT Vaush incel it’ll be a vid that’s a week or so old
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 12:46 AM
15

I mean why do you think 1 in 4 men aged 18-29 are virgins?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/21 12:23 AM
1

Yes charisma plays a part but it doesn’t matter until after you’ve met the minimal looks requirements. It’s like wanting to put on 30 pounds of lean mass. You have the motivation, nutrition, technique, and consistency down but if you have average genetics you aren’t getting past around 20 pounds no matter how many years you put in. The way I rate men in attractiveness is whether or not they have physical traits that are conventionally considered attractive. Looks are subjective to an extent but …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 03:23 PM
1

What does this have to do with the fact that by my own standards 100% of the women I’m attracted to are with men significantly better looking than me? I’m not saying it’s impossible for an average looking guy to score a hot girl without being rich but the odds are so stacked against it that only a very very very very small minority of men would reach it. Online I have seen a couple examples of a 4/10 with a 7/10, not in real life yet. Yet to see average with 8+ without money involved even online
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 01:50 PM
1

I disagree. It is only once you have met the minimal looks requirements that this becomes true. Again if straight people were to become friends with a 10/10 looking member of the same sex that wouldn’t get them to have gay sex because the minimal looks requirement haven’t been met. I originally was making my post way longer but settled on a more TLDR version since I know ppl have short attention spans and it got taken down anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 01:29 PM
1

Given that my other post stayed up and has 60+ comments I’m surprised this is considered incel content. Is it because my other post is talking about women scoring men instead of men scoring women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 12:35 PM
1

Except I never see women I’m attracted to with guys in my looks range.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 12:34 PM
1

That’s not the point though. The point is just that ppl are correct in saying a 4/10 woman has a realistic chance of scoring a 6/10 guy. But incorrect in saying a 4/10 has a realistic chance in scoring an 8-9/10. It’s the same as ppl telling guys that if they have a good personality but are 5/10 they have a realistic chance of scoring 8-9/10 women. Obviously it depends on your standards. If a 4/10 woman perceives the men who matched as 8/10 then she won but the point of this discussion is to cla…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 12:32 PM
1

If by lower my standards you mean have sex with someone I’m not attracted to no. I’m a 24 year old virgin, even if a girl is a 6-7/10 I’m not really interested. In that sense calling them a 7 seems contradictory. I would rate myself 5-6 depending on the day. I can become a 7 but it really doesn’t matter I would still be a virgin if I was an 8 because you need chemistry to get women
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 02:08 AM
1

Right but without or without the Internet women are doing the same thing. Thus the claim that Tinder and so on creates incels is invalid
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 10:51 PM
0

I’m basing the 1% on social experiment videos. In 1 a guy asked 100 women and in another he asked 200. In the 1 with 100 they counted it as 0 yes but a couple of the girls did say yes just not right now. He was asking girls out of the blue who had class or work. In the one with 200 I forgot how many they counted as yes I think it was at least 2. The guy in the vid was good looking but not a 9/10, many would say not even an 8. Sure his looks influenced the results but it still articulates how man…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 09:00 PM
0

I think you’re missing the point I’m making in saying it’s irrelevant. Like I said if I just go by what people say then I should also believe those who say I can get an 8/10 women despite being a 6/10 at best. The number of women who operate like men in having casual sex may be a minority but they aren’t 0, not even by a long shot. Statistically it’s like 1% of women (which can be seen in social experiment videos). 1% is a lot in the grand scheme. The only difference between men and women is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 06:52 PM
3

I’m male. I would say my parents equally pushed stereotypes on me but nothing extreme. My dad didn’t force me to play sports or anything. Most of my life I was an out of shape chubby boy. My dad likes sports but he and my mom are also overweight. I recall my dad once telling me if we didn’t have extra space in the bed and me or my cousin (female) had to sleep on the floor it was gonna be me because I’m male. My dad is the type who unironically thinks women are naturally significantly emotionally…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 04:38 PM
2

“No one in the town she lives pleases her.” Statistically impossible. At least 2% of men judging by the data are perceived as highly attractive and around 8% that are above average. We have 1000s of people in public daily. 2% of 1000 is 20 guys. It’s statistically impossible that you wouldn’t have success over time. So it makes no sense to claim that dating apps (that not even 10% of women are using btw) has changed the world. All Tinder does is make it easier to articulate how easily women can …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:40 PM
2

“her own assessment” makes this irrelevant. This is no different than trying to convince someone who thinks women don’t care about looks because they claim they’re average and score 8-9s and have seen plenty of other guys do the same. I know that it’s easier for women to get sex. My critique is that the black pill is claiming dating apps have created more male virgins with no logic or evidence. Most women don’t even use dating apps at that if you look up the numbers, as in not even 10% of the US…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:32 PM
-1

If there were more women than men on the app that wouldn’t mean men have a higher chance of scoring hot girls. It literally just means there’s more women than men. Casual sex is low investment yes but you aren’t gonna have sex with anyone that isn’t attractive to you. Never heard someone say a specific gender looks better or worse in photos, it’s a common opinion that everyone looks worse in most photos taken which is why models take tons of pics and then put out the best ones
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:17 PM
1

What good is more options when you already have what you need? If I had a realistic chance of scoring women I’m attracted to in public (which is 1 out of 100 women which is a lot when 1000s of people are in public) I wouldn’t need to use an app just to find more of what I’m already seeing in person. And idk if this is just me but men and women on these apps are worse looking on average than in public. I imagine that’s because the better looking people don’t need to use an app
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 12:11 PM
3

That’s what I’m saying. Not that it’s impossible but statistically I don’t how women are remotely guaranteed it. I made a profile of a non fat girl who I think most would rate 4/10 and a 2nd girl who was 4-5/10. I didn’t stay on for long was getting repetitive but I didn’t get any 8/10 men. I got 2 6/10s with the first pic and I couldn’t get a match on the 2nd girl before I hopped off. Almost no people are gonna have sex with someone who doesn’t meet the minimal looks requirements without some o…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:53 AM
1

This doesn’t really answer the question of it allowing women to score guys way out of their league solely because of apps. Pretend the gender privilege is reversed here. Apps have 0 significance in scoring women. The only way it would make sense is if there wasn’t many highly attractive men in public but there is, if anything I’d argue people men and women on these apps tend to be worse looking than who you come across in public
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/21 11:47 AM
2

“when it comes to most women the best thing about them is how they look” Well yeah because socially men and women are separated and tend to develop different interest. If everyone was bi I imagine that same sex couples would be more common than opposite
/r/MGTOW14/03/21 04:41 PM
1

Technically make up would make it so a 4/10 is not a 4/10 to someone. So I guess now the argument would be almost no women are perceived as 4/10 but I’d say the same about men. If you’re at a low body fat to keep your face from being too round and you have decent mass from lifting most guys will at least be decent
/r/MGTOW13/03/21 04:00 PM
1

I know that women can go above their looks range, everyone can just to varying degrees. If we all had an infinite amount of people we’re attracted to to ask for sex immediately eventually we would get a yes. For some that’ll be 3 attempts, others 1000, 100k, a million, etc. Eventually you come across someone who perceives you as meeting their minimal looks requirement. To be better articulate I’m sure that you wouldn’t make the claim that 100% or even 5% of attractive gay men have a realistic ch…
/r/MGTOW13/03/21 01:11 AM
-1

I don’t agree that 4/10 women have a realistic chance of getting 8/10 men. I’ll agree that a minority of less attractive women can score a minority of men slightly out of their league but most 8/10 men can get 8/10 women so they aren’t gonna settle for someone they aren’t attracted to even if it’s easy. As for the higher body count vs relationship failure I can think of lots of reasons for that but the main point would just be that it’s not inherently related so I don’t think that would be a goo…
/r/MGTOW12/03/21 10:05 PM
-4

Not really looking for a specific answer, looking to see the mindset of this type of community
/r/MGTOW12/03/21 05:16 PM
15

Yeah I don’t find any of them that attractive
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 06:18 AM
11

All the girls I find who do that stuff are ugly/average and it’s shady because it’s illegal here in the US last I checked. Could be undercover police or someone trying to rob you or worse. I also usually see prices like $500
/r/MGTOW224/10/20 06:06 AM
0

“Feminine” women are lame
/r/MGTOW219/10/20 08:49 PM
1

I mean what you’re arguing is far more ridiculous. You’re arguing that there’s far more non straight women because of some supposed studies vs just listening to what people who have no reason to lie say. To even entertain this we’d also have to conclude that women conveniently happen to be more straight than gay so we don’t get to see their homosexual relationships. “Brain activity” doesn’t tell you whether or not someone likes what they see. And as far as straight women being shamed for their s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 09:28 PM
1

The reason the most viewed porn is lesbian by women is because lesbians don’t have their sexuality suppressed by society. No one says a girl who fucked 10 girls is a thot, whore, etc. It’s all about straight women fucking tons of men. Those studies claiming women react to other nude women are just showing how women are conditioned to oversexualize other women the same way men are. You know a topless woman is “porn” and a topless man is just a topless man mindset. Bisexuals also tend to have high…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/20 08:42 PM
0

I don’t think that’s why it’s more accepted
/r/MGTOW220/06/20 12:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter