TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlacknOrangeZ Archive

View 1 posts and 423 comments by BlacknOrangeZ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

This is what I come to TRP for. There's one kinda pussy that I will always put on a pedestal.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/17 12:54 PM
9

Oh come on, you know exactly why. Men are the providers and protectors, women are the cloning devices. We don't give a shit about their ability to provide because our ancestors didn't give a shit about their women's ability to provide, and it's got us this far. We back ourselves to keep lights on and mouths fed, so we may as well prioritise signs of health and reproductive success in our mates (ie. physical beauty); and an intelligent or high achieving woman is still useless to our lineage if sh…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/17 05:09 AM
8

Also worth considering is that the type of women doing that are not the type of women you'd want your knob in anyway. We read these stories and picture a gorgeous slim blonde in our minds; the reality would probably be closer to having us puke on her face than cum on it.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/17 04:50 PM
7

Women are already medicated in extraordinary numbers for their "mental illness". It's happening. Good job, feminism.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/17 02:42 AM
94

To be fair, it's often the female judges who are best placed to see through the bullshit because they understand it better than the white-knighting male judges. I hope it doesn't diminish my point by citing Judge Judy, because obviously that's sensationalised TV trash, but she is a great example of it that many people might be familiar with.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/17 05:45 AM
5

I find it curious how you go on and on about how she is not the person you fell in love with, and while you acknowledge that you've changed, you don't quite clearly see it from the other perspective: You are not the man she fell in love with. You think she's a bitch, and she probably thinks you're a pussy. Why should she respect you any more? So have some faith. It's worked before and it will work again. Regain your independence, masculinity, pride and confidence, and trust that she will regain …
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 04:39 AM
16

Your gut reaction will probably be very hostile to this, but here goes: You need to hold your mother responsible for her role in your father's absence. Obviously I don't know your personal circumstances so you may be a fringe case. Maybe daddy was a loving, committed partner looking forward to starting a family before he got hit in the head and his personality changed overnight and he skipped the country? Probably not though. He was probably never committed to your mother, maybe didn't even want…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 05:19 AM
30

She has realized that the feminist lie of needing a job and a high paying successful career to be happy,is not what it is cracked to be Has she? She wasted no time blaming her literal patriarch. "I hate my sexist, wealthy, materialistic father, who likely instilled these ideals in me."
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 12:20 AM
10

If their foreskin is that tight then they have phimosis, which is worsened by but certainly not caused by not "forgetting to correct their foreskin after masturbating". I'm not circumcised yet that sounds fucking bizarre to me. A healthy foreskin can comfortably move over the glans (after all, that lubricating effect is one of its main purposes). I understand that phimosis can be caused by trauma to the penis by forcible retraction at a young age, which makes me wonder how many of these boys hav…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 12:13 AM
12

It happens when you are a baby so why bother talking about it? What an absurd thing to say. By that logic, you would have no issues with pedophilia?
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 11:36 PM
12

Consider it from an evolutionary biology perspective. Consider all of the extraordinarily fine-tuned feedback mechanisms, specialised cells, adapted tissues, etc. Why, especially for something as evolutionarily significant as a reproductive organ, would the foreskin still exist if it had been advantageous to have none? Also consider that foreskins clearly differ in length among men so this is a trait which has demonstrable variation, providing ample opportunity for natural selection. Consider th…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 10:27 PM
10

You're right that men are a little more easily able to empathise with boys, but I disagree with your conclusion. My reason for that is that, and this is purely anecdotal, it seems a lot of fathers use this as a reason for circumcision. They want their son to be circumcised like themselves because that is "normal" as far as they are concerned. A circumcised man deciding against circumcising his son is actually an implicit acknowledgement that his parents wronged him, and I think that's a confront…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 10:11 PM
0

Wait, am I supposed to dislike Alan Alda? What did he do?
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 07:02 PM
11

and women 'rally for change' The even sadder thing is that it probably won't be women, but pathetic Uncle Tims rallying to chemically stunt young boys. Like that extraordinary "Walk A Mile In Her Shoes" event where 'men' walk around in high heels to virtue signal their condemnation of sexual assault.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/16 08:21 AM
3

I am making absolutely no money on this whatsoever. Tugg clearly states on the site that organisers get 5% of the ticket sales revenue if successful.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/16 04:13 PM
1

Link to your inspired post?
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 04:13 PM
5

The harder the left pushes, the further society rebounds to the right.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 04:06 PM
3

I acknowledge that. That's why I don't want millions of them forced into our communities. Your argument is literally "be nice or they'll rape/kill you." Fuck them then. I won't be a prisoner in my own community, in my own nation, with my own people. THEY can fuck off. Muslims don't belong in the West. They will destroy it. White men do belong in the West. They built it. White men ARE the West. I understand your argument, but for the reason above there is therefore a fundamental difference betwee…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/16 04:04 PM
4

Faaaaaark that. I tolerated 5 minutes of hearing about how, like, cute he was, like seriously, really really attractive guys, and she's only just up to the part of her story where she actually meets him. I can't take another 16 minutes.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/16 04:31 PM
5

Sounds like a hands-on, blue-collar, simple, transparent Freemasons. I love the idea. I have this image in my head of potholes in a stretch of road that the community has been sitting on their hands whining to the government about for 3 months before your crew of misfit lads decide enough is enough and sort it out one lazy afternoon. Surely nobody could possibly spin that negatively against men. Issues with insurance having a bunch of unqualified, inexperienced guys doing labour? When the wiring…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 11:10 PM
1

Non-Aggression Principle! Libertarianism is very compatible with RP.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 08:03 PM
182

I've come to expect a post on the relationships sub like "I'm proud of my wife for exploring her sexuality but I'm wondering why I feel a bit uncomfortable about this. I know it's her body and her choice, so what can I do to get past my selfishness and prove to her that I can still be a good husband?"
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 07:52 PM
7

In our defence, it has taken a huge socialist and globalist effort over a long time to expand government power then weaponise it against the white family. I'm impressed by how long we lasted, and optimistic that we will ultimately survive our governments and start afresh.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 07:20 PM
74

It's her body and her choice, but her parents have failed her in informing that consent. Where the fuck were they for the last 18 years when they should've been teaching her that husbands really don't want wives who have been spit-roasted by every other lad in the village? I feel sorry for her for that reason. Her parents, especially her father, let her down. She'll grow into a 40 year old feminist wondering where all da real men at.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 07:16 PM
25

It was interesting how the father was all tolerant and supportive, while the mother recognised how awful the situation was. Young women don't seem to understand how much they destroy their SMV with behaviour like this. A truly high quality man would likely be sickened to learn that his darling girlfriend has this in her past. Surely her father understands this at a subconscious level but he has been so propagandised that he is posting shit about embracing and crying together with his daughter ab…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 07:11 PM
2

Thank fuck this is top comment. OP is basically celebrating his genocide!
/r/TheRedPill18/12/16 04:06 PM
1

You jest but this is what I'd suggest as a backup plan. If she won't see sense, get a lawyer to explain to her that what she did constitutes rape and that charges can and will be filed.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 02:56 PM
3

Women are less financially independent than ever. Actually, that's not true, but the difference between their perception of reality and actual reality is greater than ever. How many single mothers don't we see proudly gloating about "going it alone", glorified in society and media for being so courageous and independent... Fuck off! They are helplessly dependent on every taxpaying man within the nation! They have failed in their attempt to be independent, if they even tried, and are now so compl…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/16 11:59 AM
11

It's like a male oriented version of White Knighting™ It's called Bro Code. Cringey as the name may be, the concept is important. Men are on the receiving end of so much bullshit from the media and our twisted culture these days. Is it that much to ask that men, especially those aware of this bullshit, might occasionally have a random guy's back?
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 04:51 AM
8

I think it is written partly from the woman's perspective. I'll try to interpret: By presenting a facade of strength, a woman also raises the bar for potential mates, selecting only for men who exceed this artificially high standard with their genuine strength. Then, when the clothes come off, she can drop the act and return to her true state of weakness and submission. The disparity between her revealed feminine vulnerability and his masculine power is now greatly emphasised due to her feminist…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 05:07 PM
13

And Stalin, and probably many more. There's nothing really surprising about that since, if I recall, it recognises the most influential person of that year, not necessarily the most benevolent. (And those two were named by Time in years prior to becoming enemies of the US and co.) I'll give you a downvote though since you asked.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/16 02:16 PM
22

Don't forget to sit in the corner of coffee shops staring at girls who come in and writing notes about them while talking to yourself.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 01:05 AM
16

Is "delusional" in the list of flaws? Few demographics so consistently lack self awareness. I think especially of their laughable claim that they are "independent", while parasitising the welfare system...
/r/TheRedPill06/11/16 05:27 PM
5

Ranting and raving in a group setting is not advised, because it presents an opportunity for every other man to virtue signal at your expense, no matter how correct and justifiable your views may be. Women's in-group preference will see them unite in condemnation, paying no attention to your arguments, in an instinctive defence of the blue pill fantasy that their security and prosperity depends on. Your belligerent attempt to spark a moment of clarity in the cloudy minds of BP men is an existent…
/r/TheRedPill01/11/16 03:00 AM
3

He means rsvp.com.au It's one of the biggest dating sites here in Australia. I only just realised now that rsvp.com isn't a thing; I always assumed it was international.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 03:00 PM
6

A woman in this position, with this influence, experience, and rare moment of introspection, could be an incredible voice of reason and inspiration for young women if she builds on this. Feminism has lied to so many women who are now old, bitter, miserable, infertile, unsatisfied, and betrayed. So fucking betrayed. Imagine how powerful it would be if these women began speaking out directly to young women to warn them of the realities of their biology. Imagine if middle-aged women, invulnerable t…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 06:16 PM
9

not that it is wrong, because a normal person will do anything possible to maximize their profits Of course it's wrong! That would be fraud.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 04:25 PM
7

Bernie Sanders was the only person that wasn't a retard and actually knew what he was fucking talking about. You must be fucking with me... A geriatric socialist who has never had a real job in his fucking life preaching Marxist bullshit to irrational millenials who are just looking for an immoral proxy to steal shit from hard-working strangers to buy them "free" healthcare, education, etc? What sort of treacherous cunt has the audacity to condemn the highest taxpayers in the country for not for…
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 02:05 PM
12

Another thing about this latest trial is the facts regarding the young, erm, lady involved in this incident, and her sexual exploits either side of her dalliance Which is why feminists are pushing hard to prevent rape "victims" being questioned (or other accounts provided) on their sexual history and promiscuity in these cases. We all know it's very very relevant, but they would have it inadmissible in court as "slut shaming".
/r/TheRedPill15/10/16 04:59 AM
23

Autism level off the spectrum
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 02:13 AM
6

Thankyou. I do very well for myself financially and I honestly couldn't give a fuck what the bill is. $5 or $250, I'm happy to pay it without second thought. Granted, I've never been on a date with a woman who makes even 1/10th of what I make so that could change the dynamic a little.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/16 11:49 AM
0

You really think they'll be that bold? I loathe the system but I can at least give it credit for being good at what it does; I don't think they would ever risk the stability by directly enslaving men in such a way that it could lead to a widespread awakening. It just struck me that this phenomenon (ie. tolerance of it) is the greatest argument in favour of homosexuality being a natural trait, not a choice. Because otherwise all the quality young men would have chosen to run off John Galt-ing it …
/r/TheRedPill09/10/16 08:33 AM
1

Women are in for a rude shock when their sugar daddy government runs out of men's money.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/16 04:16 AM
4

Your definitions sound problematic. Please check your dictionary-accepted Webster-codified semantic privilege.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/16 10:42 AM
1

Message me your kik. Happy to talk any time.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/16 09:51 AM
1

Bad skin is fucking devastating. I'm convinced that only those of us who actually experience it can truly have any empathy or understanding for the completeness of its destructiveness. Ironically, the physical appearance is the least of it, once you consider the psychological impact. I'm going to suggest this though: Stop getting strong shit off the dark net. Trust me, I know how tempting it is. When you're sure you've tried everything else in existence yet still your own reflection can reduce a…
/r/TheRedPill07/10/16 08:49 AM
4

You have one of the most. (Incoherent writing styles) I've ever (seen).
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 05:10 AM
82

"toxic femininity" WRONGTHINK DETECTED Please report to your nearest Men's Project for correction.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 03:56 PM
13

Trolling? There's a lot of ammo here for anti-TRP types.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/16 03:50 PM
25

There is an argument that this is analogous to revenge porn, in a way. It's not mine and it's a while since I read it, but it goes like this: For women, it is their virtue, sexuality and exclusivity which is prized and valued. Exposing private pornographic images of them to the public undermines this value. For men, it is our confidence, assertiveness, charm and wit that is prized and valued. Exposing awkward private conversations with them to the public undermines their value in the same way. T…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 03:57 PM
1

Laying off 7000 people would be extremely expensive. It's a short term cost for a long term gain.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 01:06 AM
0

Jesus christ... I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/16 12:29 AM
2

Hell yeah. I'm an insufferable libertarian too and find people's need for government approval of their marriage to be absurd and pathetic. I'm an old fashioned guy so I support marriage, yet I am wholeheartedly against the contractual concept of "marriage" as an invitation to government to intervene and dictate the terms of a private relationship. Thank you for showing me that it works.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/16 01:05 AM
87

Within a few generations, nobody will even remember you existed. How many of us here can name or know a single thing about even one of our great great grandparents? Don't go the other way and become a nihilist waste of space though. Because that's the other option: You either realise life is fleeting and make the most of it while you can, or realise life is short and meaningless and sit on 4chan all day. We all have a legacy. We all have a family, race, heritage, culture, values and virtues that…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/16 12:17 PM
30

Blacks keep blacks down. Studying for a test? Stop acting white. Suited up for a job interview? Stop dressing white. Stop talking white. Stop walking white. Stop thinking white. Stop trying to make something of yourself like a white. Tall poppy syndrome in the most sinister, subversive form, especially as black culture then dictates that the oppressive white devil is responsible for the black man's socio-economic failure. This phenomenon is present to some extent in all cultures and populations …
/r/TheRedPill25/09/16 02:36 AM
1

What photos did you put up? I'm minted but average looking and awful game. Don't really want to be recognisable, as I'll likely forget the profile and it will remain for years.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/16 02:24 AM
1

Hurray for single payer health system! That better be a fucken joke. -Australian taxpayer
/r/TheRedPill24/09/16 03:02 PM
1

30k per person is a fuck load of taxes. It's important to factor that into the decreased incentive to work if taxes are absurdly high. Basic Income is an economic joke.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/16 01:55 AM
1

Where on earth is all that money coming from?
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 03:40 PM
1

I wouldn't go that far. Unless you're a sociopathic nihilist, it is just the silver lining of a very dark cloud.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/16 02:45 PM
2

How have I not heard of this before? Does anyone have any actual experience with SA? My bank account is arguably my greatest asset so I'd be glad to waste a few k. One girl mentioned she wants a car though so fuck that. What should I expect?
/r/TheRedPill22/09/16 01:59 PM
7

If he's brown, hold her down. If he's white, BE HER KNIGHT.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 01:41 PM
423

Haha what a chump. "I am now kind of giving her a crash course in credit cards, etc" He doesn't even realise how much he has taught her already. He thinks he is going to be giving her lessons in responsible financial management. What he has actually just done is teach her that her pussy can get a nice guy to clear all her debts anyway so #yolo.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 01:38 PM
8

Thank you. That other thread on the topic framing employment as "slavery" was ridiculous. Complete bullshit. And that's coming from a relatively successful entrepreneur worth millions by my mid 20s. I don't pretend to ignore two very important factors: Most people can't do it, and that's ok; and there are significant costs. I have as much respect for the man doing everything in his power to live independently and pay his own bills in a minimum wage job, taking responsibility for his life and not…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 11:09 AM
4

Or a couple generations of rabbit-like reproduction with multiple wives on welfare supported by your tax dollars. No turning back now you stupid fucks, even if you completely end the invasion.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 02:51 AM
1

All this "slavery" bullshit... Are you a communist?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 01:36 AM
17

The average height is always increasing. Genetics, healthcare and nutrition seem the likely factors. There have traditionally been far more significant evolutionary pressures in the past that prioritised the ability to provide and protect over raw physical appearance. A powerful warlord at 5' would be preferable partner (probably not even by choice, see Genghis Khan) than his chiselled 6'3" slave. Only in the current fantasy of artificial government-backed abundance, in the form of out of contro…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/16 12:33 AM
33

With opportunistic bitches like this around, waiting for their chance to pounce on a trivial "micro aggression" to drag your company through the mud in pursuit of victimhood validation and compensation, employers would have to be mad to not discriminate against women in hiring practices. Then the feminists cry about patriarchy and misogyny some more and the vicious cycle continues with even more indoctrinated snowflakes. Progressivism, especially feminism, is a sinister lie.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 07:22 AM
8

No shit. Who is buying a Lamborghini as a financial investment? What's the point of working/saving/investing at all if you never buy yourself something fucking awesome? Like a good salesman reassured me one time as I was about to spend a lot in his store: "You can't take it with you."
/r/TheRedPill15/09/16 02:51 PM
23

Testosterone is a social construct
/r/TheRedPill12/09/16 05:47 AM
5

Something tells me he might see the flaw in his logic if his partner violated him against his will when drunk or otherwise incapacitated.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/16 01:29 AM
16

But those are all the interesting things...
/r/TheRedPill05/09/16 03:47 PM
300

nowadays, the escorts seem to be a better catch than their 'normal' counterparts I had this thought developing as I read through your post and then you nailed it far more succinctly than I could. Being a respectful, courteous, interesting, feminine lady is apparently now a rare talent worth thousands per hour. (In fairness, I have no doubt that the market is almost as depressing for women seeking a confident, masculine man.) How far we've fallen...
/r/TheRedPill03/09/16 10:22 AM
11

Fewer children being born to sociopaths in broken homes is caring for the welfare of children. Remove the incentives for dysfunction and women will magically return to more responsible choices around pregnancy because people always respond to incentives. Yes, there may be people faced with uncomfortable realities in the interim, but that's no reason to maintain the toxic status quo. Condemning someone for not caring about children because they want to correct a destructive legal and welfare syst…
/r/TheRedPill30/08/16 04:11 PM
-3

Boohoo. They're doing the best with what they've got, and that's what you should be doing. If you won the genetic lottery you wouldn't be living a life of wedding vows and picket fences for the sake of Western civ.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 04:53 PM
3

Gender is a social construct! Gimme reparations you fucking male!
/r/TheRedPill26/08/16 05:21 AM
1

1000 usd Per week? Might be a stupid question but that "£20k per lifetime" has really thrown me. Sounds great. I saw this video a while ago about internet in Romania and if the rest of the country is anywhere near as pro-free market as that, then I would love it.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 10:01 AM
1

That sum is effectively a life's worth of work for a poor person A poor Romanian makes ~20k GBP in their lifetime? Am I understanding that correctly? Romania isn't too much of a shit hole, right? I could live like a king!
/r/TheRedPill22/08/16 04:30 PM
1

Oh I don't mean signing a contract with the government. I'm an insufferable libertarian. When I say "wife" I don't mean diving head first into the toxic quicksand of government intervention in your home life. I am a supporter of marriage but I'm opposed to Marriage™.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 01:10 PM
-11

AWALT, you're just giving her everything she needs. Keep it up. Wife that shit. But, make no mistake about it, if you ever get too complacent and turn into a beta piss ant, you'll get a cruel reminder of the truth.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/16 12:57 PM
7

What if my name isn't Tyler?
/r/TheRedPill18/08/16 01:03 PM
35

Embrace downvotes. They're just redditors.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/16 04:24 AM
5

Of course they could physically, but they actually faced consequences for being cunts in the good old days. Especially from other women. Now it's all "You go, girl!"
/r/TheRedPill04/08/16 04:38 AM
8

That sounds hilarious though. Don't discourage the autists. Wind them up, then sit back and enjoy the fireworks.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 05:37 AM
16

Blue pill dudes really believe that the child a single mother has was an "accident". Our whole culture does. It's as if they have no idea where babies come from, or think single mothers all slipped and accidentally fell on a dick. Every pregnancy, excepting those resulting from rape, is intentional. And then we're led to believe that these single mothers are "heroes" as they're glorified in the media... For what? Fucking a guy who was either so shit that he left her, or being such a bitch that s…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 12:15 PM
12

We are. You need to compare it to our ancestors, not some idyllic fantasy of human perfection. Intelligence seems to have taken priority at some point because, evidently, it became far more advantageous than sheer strength. Even the tallest, strongest warrior can be dropped by a bullet. And strength is not just "muscles" in an evolutionary sense. A superior immune system, for example, is likely to ensure far greater survival than ripped abs; and even the most beautiful people can't reproduce if …
/r/TheRedPill29/07/16 04:45 AM
1

I'm just passing through. Only slightly familiar with TRP. One thing that struck me is the aversion to marriage and children. It seems to me that an early vasectomy is about the most "beta" thing a dude can do in a biologically evolutionary sense, and I was under the impression that TRP philosophy is largely founded in exactly that. You're killing your genes. You're genetically neutering yourself. You're voluntarily preventing any hope of descendants. I can understand the negativity around marri…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 03:10 PM
1

You're still evading my point that it would be no better if it were a man (in the true sense of the word) preyed upon in these awful circumstances. Is it really going to take a few messed up men with gender identity issues before a tiny bit of empathy is invoked within misandrists like you so that the issue may be treated with the seriousness it warrants? Would you have zero concern for a person in this situation who had been born female but had decided to switch to being male? They're a man now…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 12:21 PM
2

Nobody should have to defend themselves. It ought to be a prison, not some kind of barbaric arena of rape and warfare. That inmates could be subjected to this torture ought to be horrifying regardless of the victim's identity. If your logic and ethics are consistent, this case should be no worse than if it involved a skinny, low-testosterone, anaemic little guy who proudly identifies as a dude. Or if it involved an alpha, tall, built kickboxer who happens to identify as female. Whatever psycholo…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:57 AM
5

That's an extraordinarily slippery slope you've got yourself on there. By your logic, if I were to steal a grain of rice I would be forfeiting all rights, legal and natural, in their entirety. With this warped premise, it would be ethical to deliberately subject me to the most horrific torture, degradation, slavery, mutilation, and ultimately execution. There would be no punishment too great for even the most trivial crime. That is a truly sadistic perspective. You might benefit from doing a bit…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 07:02 PM
–

An inmate was raped in prison? Haha, that'll teach him. Wait, he identifies as a woman? OH THE HORROR!
/r/MensRights18/04/16 05:00 PM
1

He's gay and makes wedding dresses You could just say he makes wedding dresses. The rest goes without saying.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:47 AM
4

I'm a little bit insulted really. You would think that, if these bitches truly believed that men were sexist and oppressive, they could at least give us a little more credit and assume we wouldn't be this bad at it. I look at all the special privileges for women and exclusive hardships for men and can't help but think "If men are sexist, we really fucking suck at it. We're doing it completely backwards."
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:44 AM
11

Do they provide a helipad for attack helicopter refuelling and rearmament though?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 09:40 AM
8

You realise the welfare state enables rewards this complacency/naivety/irresponsibility, right?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:31 AM
1

This is a ridiculous socialist argument. You pay for the goods and services you receive from the person who provides them to you; you don't owe anything to everybody all the way down the supply chain in addition to the end product. If I buy a Big Mac, I don't also owe a fee to the lettuce farmer, the truck drivers, the bakers, the power company that provides electricity to the McDonald's store, etc. I don't pay the person at the register, then head into the kitchen and pay the people cooking the…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 06:29 AM
1

I'm of the same view. Companies should be able to hire whoever they like without these ridiculous quotas. If you want a workforce entirely composed of midget transsexuals from Lesotho then go right ahead! The free market will soon dictate that the best strategy is to hire on merit, and so anyone demonstrating any actual discrimination is putting their business at a competitive disadvantage by missing out on talent that their opposition is only too happy to hire. The issue is that, in this age of…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:02 AM
3

King entered the Astrodome in Cleopatra style, carried aloft in a chair held by four bare-chested muscle men dressed in the style of ancient slaves. Riggs followed in a rickshaw drawn by a bevy of scantily clad models. With the insanity of today, imagine the backlash that would get for racism and sexism and god only knows what else.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 05:03 PM
–

Really? Next you'll tell me she wasn't actually casting magic spells and it was all just special effects.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:51 PM
3

Huh? Why would you bother building a happy, stable relationship when the perverse incentives of the state allow you to suspend each other in an eternal state of paranoia and suspicion at the end of a gun, ready to pounce on the slightest transgression to send their life spiralling into ruin for your own gain?
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:38 AM
3

It seems so odd to me that women would even want to discuss intimate details like this about their intimate partner. How insulting. I can't imagine the sense of betrayal I would feel if my partner ever did that to me. Could you imagine a man belittling his wife/girlfriend because he had been with more attractive women in the past? It seems impossible to ignore that this is related to the disrespect with which women are permitted to treat men nowadays. The same kind of disrespect which is rightly…
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:53 AM
–

In response, plenty of friends have been sharing this failed attempt by a female Aussie interviewer to flirt with a random guy on the beach. It's awkward, but perfectly innocent. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2876994/Nuala-Hafner-chats-hunky-tattooed-beachgoer-mid-weather-report-gets-knocked-back.html Men bad, women good. Men bad, women good. Men bad, women good. Men bad, women good. Men bad, women good. The socialist war on family values continues.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:17 AM
–

She was "mentally ill". She needs help, the poor dear.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 07:11 AM
6

Oh shit, I remember that! It was brought up around the wage gap myth. Advocates for higher pay for women said that their longer life expectancies necessitated higher pay in order to afford a longer retirement. Now I'm mad.
/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:23 PM
1

Incentivise, and ye shall receive
/r/MensRights04/01/16 05:16 PM
2

That's the best part about your autism, you probably don't even notice when people are picking on you!
/r/MensRights15/12/15 11:59 PM
1

Yeah and if you look through the comments there's often plenty of sense in there. Reddit is still left leaning, for the most part, so very vulnerable to the kind of emotional manipulation that feminism relies on, but there is certainly a common gut feeling (perhaps just under the surface of consciousness) that suggests something is up.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 09:23 AM
–

"They're on to us! They know we don't have a Rape Culture! What can we do?" "Import one. "
/r/MensRights08/12/15 01:07 PM
1

Such as? Tell me a single time where a company did something morally reprehensible and it was lauded in the media and public discussion. "Volkswagen manipulated their emissions testing results, oh boy what a great company! I'm going to rush out and buy a new VW!"
/r/MensRights06/12/15 07:19 AM
0

If they can deny men entry, can they then decide to deny lesbians entry? Can they later decide ethnic minorities are banned? Yes. Of course they can. It's their own private property, they can allow or deny whoever the hell they like on their property. Just like if a violent criminal knocks on my door, I don't have to let him in. Nobody can force you to associate with someone you don't want to associate with (not only is it ethically wrong, but I would argue that it is socially harmful). Am I dis…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 04:27 AM
0

It's true that the invitation does change things a little, though not to any great extent in my mind. They still retain the right to discriminate in my view, it's just that they've been even more crappy in the inconvenience they've caused. Perhaps it should've been apparent to him that his invitation was conditional on being accompanied by his wife though (which, again, you may not like, but that doesn't trump their right to pick and choose who is allowed on to their property).
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:53 AM
5

I don't like these. This is a private business, they can allow or refuse entry to whoever they like. There are many men's spaces I would like to be maintained as well, and cases like this undermine those. They have a right to discriminate. He has a right to be upset about it and share his experience. To sue them for it, however, for financial gain or to force them to be non-discriminatory for fear of persecution, is morally reprehensible.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:52 AM
1

Those are some truly disgusting lies. You need to consider why they might feel the need to forego valid arguments and instead make up the most sickening bullshit they can to discredit the movement from the safety of their own insulated echo chamber. Well done, and thank you, for recognising it as propaganda and coming here to find the truth. I'm a little discouraged that you were inclined to believe it at all, but I do understand.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 12:42 AM
13

The undertone of the entire thing was that teenage boys are all manipulative and evil Typical day at school for boys these days then. You sure they were police officers, not teachers?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 10:28 AM
–

Sounds like a mess for future employers and universities though. If I employ someone with good supporting academic credentials, I want to be sure that they are actually capable of that. It's no good fucking a job up 9 times even if you nail it on the 10th attempt.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:00 AM
3

There's two sides to every story Absolutely, and I'm glad you posted yours. I hope you can understand my previous comment in the context of the one side of the story I had at the time. It strikes me as very odd that he would post his experience using an account that he must have known you are clearly aware of. I don't see what on earth he thought he had to gain by doing that. You were obviously going to see it eventually (sooner rather than later, apparently). I can't possibly pretend to know wh…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:12 PM
1

Tax credits and child benefit go to the parent with custody I figured as much, but that's a huge discussion for another day. And I still don't know why I'm paying her shit off. I'm a sucker for punishment I guess. This, on the other hand, is immediately obvious in its insanity. This woman started fucking another guy, then took off with him and has continued to make it difficult to this day for you to see your own daughter. And you're paying her bills?! Come on, man. How does it make you feel whe…
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:02 PM
1

I think that the likes of child benefit/tax credits should be split evenly between me and my daughters mother. Are they not already? Can you explain this to a non-UK guy? And why on earth are you paying this woman's debts!?
/r/MensRights28/11/15 02:17 AM
3

Male privilege is having gender-specific laws to help you get into jail.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 03:45 PM
1

You just described the ABC here in Australia! (And virtually all other broadcasters here as well, to be fair)
/r/MensRights25/11/15 01:17 AM
2

Also worth noting that adoptive parents typically have to overcome tremendous obstacles to prove their worth as parents. Nobody needs permission to get pregnant though. In fact it's so easy and appealing that it often happens by accident! Single mothers are almost sociopathic by definition.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 01:28 PM
–

I can't recall if it was legit or satire but I have a vague memory of a news article that started: "A woman has died after the suicide vest she was wearing detonated..."
/r/MensRights23/11/15 01:39 PM
22

That headline almost writes itself for Buzzfeed et al.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 06:03 PM
7

Males can contact their local Patriarchy representative and a female will be provided to perform her domestic duty.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:30 PM
1

Can confirm, I end up with a sore back every time I try.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:26 PM
15

http://i.imgur.com/8cVe7Yq.png
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:21 PM
3

Nope, straight as an arrow. Sorry mate. Maybe you'll have better luck on Grindr.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 11:18 AM
–

Not sure if you're joking but that kind of talk is more suited to TRP or something, not here.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 01:17 AM
1

FH has 20 staff now? Good for you guys!
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:57 AM
3

That's horrible. Did nobody say anything? Was she a good liar? Did you only make the connection after the breakup?
/r/MensRights25/10/15 02:40 AM
–

When you bring a misogynistic, white supremacist men’s rights activist to campus in the name of ‘dialogue’ and ‘the other side,’ you are not only causing actual mental, social, psychological and physical harm to students, but you are also — paying — for the continued dispersal of violent ideologies that kill our black and brown (trans) femme sisters … you are dipping your hands in their blood … The crazy is off the charts with this one.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 05:10 PM
1

whose to
/r/MensRights17/10/15 01:04 AM
1

But explicit, repeated, affirmative consent is sexy, right? ...right?
/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:38 PM
2

Who cares? Why use the state to enforce your preference against their will? Find a different provider that will happily cater to your needs and give them your money instead. Why go out of your way to do business with a company that discriminates against you?
/r/MensRights10/10/15 03:56 AM
-1

It wasn't meant to be an attack on you. I appreciate that you would never subject a child to circumcision and I'm glad that you're happy with yours. It was a slightly ranty expansion on my thoughts regarding it, don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 12:36 PM
-3

Sure, no problem with that! I want everybody to be happy with their bodies. The problem is with violating a baby's health and safety due to the parents' arbitrary preference; with permanently modifying their body well before they are able to be consulted and provide informed consent; with surgically altering their genitalia, a very sensitive and invaluable component of a man's identity. If they reach sexual maturity and decide for themselves that they would prefer to be circumcised, great! Go an…
/r/MensRights07/10/15 10:38 AM
4

His pro-circumcision view shocked me. His reasoning was basically that he sucks a lot of dick and prefers it cut, so fuck the health and rights of defenceless baby boys. I like Milo but I'm struggling with that.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 03:20 AM
3

My government is abusive and I have nowhere else to go!
/r/MensRights30/09/15 07:55 AM
7

How can you not "believe" in rape? I have no idea what that means. Rape isn't leprechauns or unicorns, it's not really open to opinion.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 06:53 AM
1

civilization Government absolutely depends on slavery in some form
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:04 PM
6

I wish this were true but it's probably unlikely to make a significant difference in a welfare state. The women don't care where the money is coming from (the father or the sugar daddy state) but the state does. If it can force fathers to pay the bill, it will. Ironically it is only this welfare "safety net" that empowers women to irresponsibly have children in unstable relationships with complete disregard for the financial consequences and the child's needs in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 04:03 PM
–

"Women are stupid and should not be allowed to hold public office." Media frenzy in 3...2...1...
/r/MensRights26/09/15 01:28 AM
1

Pussy doesn't buy daddies that pay all your bills anymore. They don't need it since they realised they can simply vote for the state to be their welfare sugar daddy. Make the men pay whether they like it or not.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:44 AM
1

No sane man is going to be interested in a narcissistic single mother of four. Sociopath attracting sociopaths. How could any decent man condone and support her choice to bring four children into such a toxic environment. Her honesty is about the only thing going for her.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 12:41 AM
6

Why would he want his job back? Insult aside, it's safe to say the private settlement would've been somewhere close to the 30m he sought. He was earning a million per year there, which means he was probably contributing several million of value to the company. They've lost a very valuable asset, and damaged their reputation amongst other elite executives. An apology wouldn't go astray, though the compensation is in place if that. The women ought to apologise, and also ought to now be subject to …
/r/MensRights25/09/15 06:08 PM
1

There is literally no one in the media or politics who is willing to stand up to the rad fems. As part of this they are going to be teaching "affirmative consent" in ALL schools. First I've heard of that. Source?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 10:03 AM
–

I have been yelling and screaming at the radio all afternoon over the extraordinary ignorance and outrageous sexism on display in regards to this program. Firstly, they are saying it is targeting domestic violence. Bullshit. It is targeting domestic violence by men against women. At least be honest about it. None of this will go towards assisting men. Women will be held no more accountable for their abusive behaviour tomorrow than they are today. The Prime Minister has called for this (Violence …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:23 AM
1

Yeah choking is not typically something done in self defence. I can understand the hitting, if he felt he was in imminent danger, and I would completely support reasonably restraining her in some way, but choking screams aggressor.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:44 PM
6

How about equality of outcome in the prison system too? Sure, men may commit vastly more crimes than women, but we need to have a 50/50 split, right? Should we start picking women out at random on the street to lock up for a while?
/r/MensRights23/09/15 09:41 PM
7

At least they don't blame it on confused men when the stars don't align.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 03:27 AM
3

Who gives a fuck what the law says? It is demonstrably immoral and unjust in many ways. Let ethics guide your behaviour and judgement, not the law. I've told girls before to go ahead and have some fun if they wake up before me. I trusted them and it was entirely consensual even if I was unconscious initially. Nobody and no law has any right to interject there to incriminate my partner or tell me I'm a victim.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:51 PM
2

I agree entirely and clarified in my other response. Sorry for the confusion.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:03 PM
1

No no no, fair point. I was working on the assumption that those closest to the accuser often have intimate knowledge of the truth (I wouldn't be surprised if this often came in the form of an explicit confession that the accusation is a deliberate manipulation of the legal system) which may not be provable in court. And in the cases where people are found guilty of falsely accusing, I would like to see a more appropriate social reaction to that rather than apparently enhancing their victim stat…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 12:14 PM
-1

Legally, yes. Not morally. I would much rather we see these people called out and ostracised by their friends and family for attempting to unjustly ruin a person's life than to see them put through the court system (I would like that too, to be clear). Unfortunately it's a little too delicate for anyone to take a stand though so it remains in this pseudo socially acceptable state; not because it's not universally understood to be disgraceful, but because nobody dares to condemn the perpetrators.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:37 AM
–

Where was his master anyway? She should be fined for inadequate supervision of her male.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:03 PM
8

It's not really the right question. Even if you want to believe that circumcision magically reduces the likelihood of STD transmission, and even if you believe it looks better and feels better... So what? None of those benefits are advantageous for a child. A baby won't be having sex (I hope) so who cares about the sensitivity damage and STD implications. I fully support any man who happily and voluntarily consents to a circumcision when he is sufficiently mature to make such a decision. I absol…
/r/MensRights05/09/15 03:44 AM
4

The Racism formula isn't even resolving for me. Did I forget to carry the Juan?
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:59 AM
1

At least they'll be useful for something then.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 02:15 AM
–

Is he not already too socialisty for you? Does he need to grow horns and wield a pitchfork before you decide he's not the messiah?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 05:47 AM
–

It's a very odd thing to say. What I found more concerning, however, was the title: "Mother, 71, jailed for historical sexual abuse of twin daughters". ...and her son? You know, the third child she sexually abused? Especially since, judging by the sentencing, I'm assuming the abuse of her son was far more horrific (minimum ~4.5 years for both daughters, ~8 years for son).
/r/MensRights28/08/15 02:52 PM
6

Yep, but that goes both ways. You can't claim to live by "bros before hoes" if you screw your bro's hoe.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 10:26 AM
6

You don't have to be a white knight to acknowledge that sleeping with someone who you know to be in a relationship is a dog move. If anything, I think it's the complete opposite, in that my thoughts were focussed on the boyfriend/husband rather than some misguided attempt to absolve her of all blame. I agree with everything you said. She is mostly at fault; if it's not with him then she would find some other piece of shit anyway; and if it happened to me then 99% of my anger and betrayal would b…
/r/MensRights26/08/15 09:31 AM
–

Most of all the women I've slept with in my adult life where almost all married or in a relationship Uhhh... That kinda makes you the scum of the earth too, you realise?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:14 AM
–

Your tone makes it sound like you think your friend shouldn't have told his girlfriend. Surely you don't mean that? It would've been much much better telling her when they were alone and sober, but at least he told her. Cheating is already bad enough; not telling your partner (immediately) takes the disgrace to another level.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:05 AM
2

I hope your boss got what he deserved.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 06:40 AM
3

Relationships are dangerous. Only when the state intervenes. Of course none of that shit is actually wrong, but when our governmental overlords decide that it's criminal to give your sleeping missus a kiss goodbye, that's when you know things have gone off the deep end. It would be really nice if they just backed the fuck off and stopped this destructive campaign of turning men and women against each other.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:09 PM
–

What the hell is wrong with cargo shorts? I'm genuinely interested in what their point is. I don't own any myself but I always thought they looked ok.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:28 PM
3

But that's the business model here. The women are the product. Of course the men are paying! This would only be sexist if the service provided was the same, but clearly it's not. Indeed it's quite obvious that women are the ones providing the service; the site is just the middle man. Even if they try to be subtle about the true nature of the arrangements for the sake of preserving a little class, I'm sure everybody knows exactly what's going on in this little network of websites. It's all volunt…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 02:16 PM
3

I was just looking at those numbers a week ago for a post in another sub. My jaw dropped when I put 2 and 2 together. The typical "every 2nd weekend" falls just barely under the 51 nights per year, classing it as zero effective child care contribution, meaning 100% of financial contributions are direct to the other parent. Needless to say, I was also horrified at the other adverse conditions incentivised by the government. Daddy in jail? More money. Daddy not around at all (single mother)? Even …
/r/MensRights11/08/15 03:23 AM
4

I wouldn't call that chivalry, chivalry isn't about blind servitude to women even though many people use it that way nowadays. Lying to incriminate a fellow man is the complete opposite of chivalrous behaviour.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 03:51 AM
7

Monster. I bet you don't even put trigger warnings in your code.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 11:04 PM
1

I was in the same position. According to Wiki, Rodham is her maiden name.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 07:36 AM
–

"Behaviour Change Programs" always makes me feel uneasy. Conjures images of lobotomies and scenes from Clockwork Orange.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:37 AM
8

My wife's go to argument, when discussing women's issues in America, is that she personally feels scared Yeah... that's not an argument at all. Being scared due to an irrational paranoia is nobody's responsibility but her own. I could simply say I'm "scared" of anything to censor, discredit or validate whatever position I wanted otherwise. It's not an argument. If she genuinely has this fear, and given the brief history you offered it's not entirely unreasonable, then she needs to seek help for …
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:26 AM
1

Ha. You don't foresee feminists might take advantage of a company that, as early as the construction phase, is already building with the intent to have vastly more men on the books than women? That's low hanging fruit, feminists would lap it up.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:17 AM
6

I'm an Aussie and I don't see much "logic" here at all. Our media is FULL of feminist crap at the moment. I mean fucking FULL to the brim. Expect to see more where this came from.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 05:03 AM
2

some javascript in curly braces His name is JSON.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 05:08 AM
–

I agree there are probably rare cases where a man takes a knock to the head and suddenly becomes violent in nature, or where some mislead women into believing that they are in it for the long haul before running off, and certainly cases where men are disloyal. And in every one of those I don't blame the woman one bit for going it alone, in fact I would encourage it, nobody deserves to be treated like that. There are also women who fall pregnant to men without ever having discussed safe sex and p…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:17 AM
7

Honestly I think people have the wrong idea of us and we're happy to ham it up online for the sake of the national identity. Nobody here would actually use "cunt" in public unless it was very informal amongst good friends. I notice myself slip into it a bit when I'm in those situations, but I would be horrified if it slipped out of my mouth around anyone I had respect for or wanted to respect me (of course that's not to say I don't respect friends, but you know, anything goes there). I cringe an…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:57 AM
–

Men already earn more (just ask any feminist) and pay more in tax to subsidise poor choices by women, such as the epidemic of single motherhood. They have no boundaries, there is no end to the moral corruption of these people. They will keep using the power of the state to fuck over whoever they can to make their own ride even smoother, to hell with the people on the other end of their selfishness. And not only do they do shit like this, but they actually pretend that they're doing the right thi…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:23 AM
1

Exactly. I'm a proud and confident man, but if a guy attacks me I'll have no shame in kicking him in the balls and running away if I can. That's his weak spot. Just like if a woman has long hair that I can get a good fistful of, you better believe I'll yank that as hard as I can and run away. If her tits dangle in front of me I'll squeeze and twist those fuckers to get her off me if need be. When it comes to self-defence, you do whatever you have to, and it's only wise to target your assailant's…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:16 AM
–

Thanks, cunt. Nice to see you make an exception for us Aussies, we honestly can't help it.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 01:09 AM
3

You haven't really provided any background, to be fair. And if you want to talk statistics, single motherhood is about the worst possible indicator for a child's development that you could possibly imagine. It's usually disastrous. Now obviously I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume there's a very good reason why the father is not in the picture. And so instead I''ll beg you to find a good male role model who can have a significant influence in your son's life. Someone stable. Boyfri…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 05:34 PM
1

Thanks, I watched this last night and thought it was fantastic. I especially liked the quote "women are from Venus, men are from hell". I can't remember what she said exactly but it also made me conscious of a destructive cycle that is occurring in the world of men and boys, propagated probably subconsciously/naively/benevolently by even well-meaning feminists. The rise of single motherhood (subsidised by the sugar daddy government, male taxpayers) leads to young men having grown up with no dece…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 05:00 AM
-1

This is exactly the sort of non-existent rape which constitutes the "rape epidemic". Lie, add another to the tally, gain credibility and social awareness for further lies, repeat. It's sickening. Not just the system for allowing it, but the morally corrupt sociopathic cunts who exploit that hole to ruin innocent men's lives.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:25 AM
2

Just because you're incredibly drunk (note the qualifier, any level of drunk doesn't count) and have sex doesn't mean you were raped. By the legal definition (and common sense), you'd be right. By the mad feminist minefield laid out in colleges, you are actually wrong. Drunk means unable to consent means rape (though this irresponsibility is granted almost exclusively to females).
/r/MensRights22/07/15 11:20 AM
6

This one stood out to me. Men have children too.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:42 AM
2

I do the opposite, in a way. If the stranger happens to be an attractive woman I stop and ask myself if I would do the same for someone I could not possibly have any innate ulterior motive for assisting: would I do it for a guy, would I do it for a kid, would I do it for an old lady? If I can answer yes to those then I know I'm not being exploited and I'm being genuine.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 06:53 PM
3

Holy shit that is impossible to read. Please proofread, or ask somebody else to.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:36 PM
1

Infinitely better than cheating, at least. I'd consider it an ultimatum, a final offer of "The only way I can continue in this relationship is if you're ok with XYZ". The issue, however, is that a lot of partners don't have the self respect to say "Actually, I'm not ok with XYZ. Goodbye." I still can't quite bring myself to think less of them for suggesting it though, in fact it's a level of brutal honesty that I think would strengthen a lot of relationships out there.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 11:32 AM
–

Why can't this work both ways, though? If a young woman falsely accuses her partner of rape, what's to stop him saying "ok then, by that definition, she raped me too"? Everything in that article seemed fairly gender-neutral to me, so I see no reason why a falsely accused person (or, unfortunately, a genuine date-rapist) could not simply pull the reverse on their accuser. It seems so easy in that sense to expose these laws for the bullshit they are. If men are forced into the game, they should pl…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:03 AM
–

"Study finds male rights activists learn more than female rights activists, because they read longer titles..."
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:57 AM
1

I always wondered who the hell watches Fox (seriously, not for a laugh). I can't believe I've found one out in the wild!
/r/MensRights07/07/15 02:09 AM
1

I saw this a few nights ago and thought it was fantastic! There were a couple moments where I literally groaned and threw my arms up in the air with the whole disposable male thing, but I'll be damned if I'm letting a bit of that get in the way of a good action movie. And the action really was amazing, although the acting was awful. I think part of the reason I'm giving this a pass is because it was so obviously pro-feminist pro-disposable-male that I can't really hold that against it. It wasn't…
/r/MensRights06/07/15 04:43 PM
–

It's not just the ABC, our media here is going mental with this attack on men lately. I couldn't contain my smile last week when I read through The Age without a single anti-male propaganda piece. Sadly that's pretty rare.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:38 AM
3

What is their end game though? Or do they not look beyond the destruction they're causing today, except maybe to consider where their next sociopathic thrill will come from. When will they stop?
/r/MensRights04/07/15 02:36 AM
2

Ex?
/r/MensRights03/07/15 01:51 AM
5

That man's owner is very irresponsible. He should've been on a short leash with a muzzle on.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 01:44 AM
–

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/9860845/Julie-Burchill-on-abandoning-her-son-and-taking-drugs.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/to-mum-i-was-just-an-inconvenience-says-burchills-son-1104110.html Notable quotes from the articles: "This is a bit pathetic, like Celia Johnson in Brief Encounter. So you put on more lipstick and walk into the sunset." She has described the fuss about her children as "a load of pompous cant, basically. Men do it all the time" In the much later article, however,…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 05:57 AM
7

prenap This is my new name for my 2.30pm whiskey.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:50 AM
–

Maybe they will take everything from both gay men so they have prizes to distribute to divorcing lesbians?
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:49 AM
17

What the hell did I just watch
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:03 PM
3

The moustache started to block his nostrils.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:34 PM
–

Why not make both gender neutral then?
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:38 AM
6

Not "free". Paid for by millions of taxpayers (mostly male tax dollars, dare I say) taken from them by the government. Female voters are so easily bought.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:25 PM
3

Wow this guy really seems to have his head screwed on. I like him.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:15 PM
6

This woman is a national disgrace. I'm so fucking sick of her self righteous bullshit. I grew to dislike her even more reading that crap on the homepage but then my mind was truly blown. That little 'Quick Escape' button followed me down the page so I curiously clicked it and was redirected to Google. Websites now have trigger warnings and fucking safe spaces built in. The world has gone mad. Ok against my better judgement I went back there to see if there was any love for men at all and found t…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 07:04 PM
-19

Oh it's you... How's that sub of yours going? Still all alone I hope?
/r/MensRights12/06/15 06:35 PM
–

allowed him to slip beneath the water while in the bath, ensuring water entered the tracheotomy site in his throat Holy fuck that is pure evil. I can't even imagine how terrifying that would've been.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:43 PM
–

I don't want society to get like this, please don't encourage it. Let those who indulge in hysteria remain the outcasts, not the ones who dictate what is 'normal'. A famous athlete just flashed his dick to the world. Are we really going to pretend that we're offended by the attention it's getting? Every man is probably taking a quick look to see how he sizes up against LeBron, every woman is probably having a cheeky peek because why not. It's a dick. It appeals to our curiosity, sexuality, compe…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 05:33 PM
1

I'd be concerned about his wife's motive, to be perfectly honest. I think most people accept that a man who belittles his wife for having friends or in any way tries to undermine, discourage or more forcibly prevent her from having close friendships is abusive to some degree. It's challenging for a sociopath to really dig their claws in if their target has a support network in place who might warn their friend or even step in themselves if they notice things turning sour. Isolation is what the a…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:41 AM
6

Just to clarify, are you female? I don't really see a problem with patients choosing doctors based on their own preferences, in fact I would strongly encourage it because obviously there needs to be trust and honesty there. I do, however, take issue with GPs being discriminatory, especially in situations like OP's where options are limited (rural). I see no issue with you factoring in your religious background in choosing a doctor, but I would take issue with a doctor refusing to treat you becau…
/r/MensRights12/06/15 04:24 AM
5

Ok, let's say "misogyny" has lost its proper meaning and has instead been adapted as a tool by some. Let's say I stop using that word. Use whatever words you like, OP is still a mod with all 25 posts currently on the front page of a subreddit titled "WomenHate". So he's a self-confessed woman hater, right? I don't understand how that's any kind of stretch to say that. Is that the kind of person we want representing or involved with MRM in any way? Doesn't that actually do it a lot of damage? I s…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:40 AM
7

OP is fairly active on /r/WomenHate, maybe even a mod? He's probably worried that that subreddit will be banned (judging by the name alone I'd say there's a very good argument for it) and wants to pre-emptively conflate this sub with that one. To which I say fuck off. He's the type who gives so many ill-informed people the excuse of branding us all "misogynists", because he actually is.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:10 AM
2

Well that clears it up. Hope they brought a change of clothes.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:53 PM
4

Amazing indeed. Thankyou so much for posting this. One of the most thoughtful and uplifting things I've ever seen courtesy of this sub.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 04:16 PM
9

Oh shit, my son was just killed. He wasn't female! We can't let the people catch on, quick, come up with a plan! Call it "Family Violence" Same as "Domestic Violence", right everyone? "Domestic Violence" is something done by men, remember? "Domestic Violence" is something done to women of course! Phew, there we go. We managed to turn the murder of a boy into an assault on all women at the hands of all men.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 10:01 AM
4

A sexist cunt who let her son's violent father take him out on the weekend because she believed "he wouldn't murder him in a public place" so it should be ok! He was brutally murdered at a cricket match. She has never taken any responsibility or shown any remorse for this; quite the opposite in fact. It propelled her into the spotlight in which she loves being the #1 leading victim in the country (what an honor!). She received the Australian Of The Year award... Yeah. Despite having no fucking i…
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:57 AM
–

coping with one own's circumcision I think this is key. Compounding this is the logical consequence that, by acknowledging the immorality of circumcision, they must acknowledge the immorality of their own circumcision, so they must acknowledge that they were wronged by their parents. A lot of people seem extraordinarily reluctant to accept that their parents weren't perfect.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:56 PM
49

The entitlement is palpable. 3 years ago I would've thought this was alright. Fortunately no more. Good for you!
/r/MensRights02/06/15 03:47 PM
–

Wage/Prod for males and females. It seems that women are getting a fairly consistent wage per prod, but the wage/prod ratio for men is decreasing. This is because we have had to prod them more and more despite keeping the wage consistent. I suggest prodding males less frequently but with with pointier sticks to counter this negative trend.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 10:36 AM
1

I agree. In perhaps an obscure way, I could draw parallels between this and "the wage gap", in that so long as the laws and culture are equally applied regardless of gender, then the outcome is fair no matter how disproportionately they may eventually be represented. In other words, equality of opportunity VS equality of outcome. It's why affirmative action in employment is so ridiculous. It would be like deliberately and consciously giving men lighter sentences to counter their higher testoster…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 08:44 AM
5

I just finished reading this article in the paper, laughing my arse off, and expected to find it here. "Women are subject to the same laws as men!? SEXISM!" Amazing stuff. If this was a parody of feminism's infiltration of politics and law I'd almost say it was a bit too far, but here we have the real thing straight from the horse's mouth. You couldn't make this shit up. (Also I'm curious if this is your local paper, OP? Small world!)
/r/MensRights01/06/15 06:04 AM
2

It's wrong to initiate violence against anyone... What a silly debate, I'm not even watching.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 11:55 AM
–

What an amazing mum though. One day that boy will understand that his mother went to prison to protect him, in stark contrast to the many parents (his own father included) who insist that their sons are imperfect and need surgical alteration, cruelly doing so as early in infancy as possible while they are defenceless and their treatment is incomprehensible to them, presumably to avoid facing the terrifying reality that every healthy boy would fiercely defend himself from the physical threat of p…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:23 AM
–

It's changing. Don't use past tense, you should be proud that you are having an effect. I'd assume there are a lot of people out there who have never even had the inevitability of circumcision challenged, they've never even considered the alternative. And there are still a lot of people who truly believe the religious propaganda that it's healthier or whatever. Keep going. I'm reminded of a story about a boy walking along the beach where countless starfish had washed up and were now slowly dying…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 08:07 PM
1

Do you not have gender segregated private schools in US (or wherever you are)? We have them everywhere here in Australia. I didn't go to one myself but I have friends and family, men and women, who did and they seem perfectly well adjusted. Perhaps this is a little bit culturally elitist of me to say, but I think a large part of that is because they do almost exclusively tend to be fairly prestigious private schools; I'm not sure outcomes would be quite so positive in lower socioeconomic areas.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 05:23 AM
-4

Bro... Eat a Snickers
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:56 AM
5

Why care? They openly admit to existing purely to troll. I go there for a bit of a laugh sometimes. You're taking them way too seriously.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 03:36 AM
–

Ha! That would go down like a lead balloon. Feminist publications would have a field day crying victim over the university with buildings catered to STEM fields, for example, "so hostile to female students that they don't even provide bathroom facilities exclusively for women next to the men's. They have two types of student: Men (complete with special facilities supplied and fitted by the patriarchy), and 'everyone else', it seems."
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:31 PM
1

So... Why is he your lawyer still?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:16 PM
–

Wait til we have the facts before getting the pitchforks out. May be adopted or they used a sperm donor due to fertility issues, etc.
/r/MensRights20/05/15 06:13 PM
8

There was actually more than this video provided. He showed an email exchange where she went out of her way to make it difficult for this student to get help (in spite of his patience and resilience) and others backed him up with similar encounters with the same staff member. Anyway, there's an investigation now so we'll know soon enough if she has anything to add that could excuse such behaviour.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:22 PM
8

It's happening all the time. It happened to you, it happened to me. It's a gradual thing for each individual and so it's a gradual thing for society.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:16 PM
2

It's not even that. I was there for all of 5 minutes, posted two questions which were genuinely trying to understand the particular post better and honestly did not even differ to what they were saying. Banned. I was there in good faith, trying to learn more. Not any more. I suddenly becamse so disillusioned. Why should I even bother?
/r/MensRights15/05/15 05:36 AM
3

Didn't seem to stop the person who put this one up...
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:20 AM
2

She's a great advertisement for the meat industry. I'm going to cook up some steak right now.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:18 AM
1

So you'll just ignore my point then? Would it be appropriate for a male to wear speedos to class? Of course not. (Even if you think it ought to be, it's not by this school's dress code, and that's all that matters. Are you suggesting schools should not have the right to dictate such standards?)
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:18 PM
8

There's also the thing, that you shouldn't assume that if someone dresses as they do, are doing it for the sake of sexual attraction or such That doesn't matter. I might go to school naked except for a flashing strobe light attached to my head for a very personal reason that has absolutely nothing to do with my fellow students. My motivation is completely irrelevant to the fact that it will be extremely distracting to them, however. That's why dress codes exist. I'll be sure to turn up to your f…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:54 PM
3

In a sense, I agree. They're not wrong, but I don't think it does anyone any favours by drawing attention to it. All it needs is a simple and stern reminder that the school maintains a dress code and expects students to uphold these values. Nobody is forcing the students to attend; if they don't feel that their values are in line with the school, then they should not go. I would hope the parents would step in here though, if the school does not feel able, and take advantage of this learning oppo…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:48 PM
1

Myth # 8. Women could leave a violent relationship if they really wanted to. It's worded poorly (in fact I would go as far as to say it's probably deliberately misleading). If you read the points in the dropdown then they explain it to mean that violent and possessive men are more likely to snap if the women leave. Sounds reasonable. Although you're absolutely right that, especially with their thousands of refuges, pretending women have no option to leave is bullshit. Myth #6. Women need to be m…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 07:46 PM
–

They're even more deluded than you think. They say "0.0005 percent". That's equal to 5 in 100,000, or 1 in 20,000. It's a shame because the most of the info there is pretty good. All of those myths are busting the narrative that men are innately violent, can't control their anger, alcohol is an excuse, etc. Maybe others read this differently, but to me that gives the message that some men are indeed bad but that this should not reflect on all men as whole. "Working on stopping violence against w…
/r/MensRights09/05/15 08:43 AM
1

If that's the thing upsetting the conservatives then just remind them that gays are having all the fun at the moment, so we need some urgent estrogen in the men's.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:44 AM
0

I don't know if I've ever seen urinals with dividers. In fact I've been to two that had a fucking MIRROR at chest height along the wall, such that it was damn near impossible not to catch a glimpse of the other lads in its reflection if you were to look straight ahead. Maximum awkward.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:42 AM
2

Yeah I might go take a dump in the women's toilet and upload a selfie of my business and a big proud smile.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:37 AM
1

Ha! I like it. "Sorry, officer, I saw the facilities for women and the facilities for couples, but I'm just a lowly man so I figured I had to relieve myself on this tree like the other dogs."
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:34 AM
0

Wow that is the exact point of this submission... WHOOSH
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:20 AM
1

Oh shit, I'm not a virgin, that leaves only one option: I'm going to be an Elliott Rodger! Really though, you made some great points there. I bet you win all the arguments at preschool.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:16 AM
2

Great job, I especially like the "Cut It Out" motto. Did you coin that one?
/r/MensRights07/05/15 09:02 PM
2

Ignore it. Obvious troll. Kudos for the reasonable reply, I would've told them to fuck off.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:57 PM
6

What a wretched website, on mobile at least. (I mean the design, not the content)
/r/MensRights06/05/15 10:33 AM
3

Those absurd extremes there won't work... Come on. They voluntarily had sex with a stranger whose identity (only in terms of physical appearance) they did not even bother to verify in order to satisfy this fantasy. Is it rape if I pop my dick through a glory hole, yell over the cubicle wall that I'm Ryan Gosling, and have a woman fantasising about her favourite movie star as she rushes over to screw me? I wonder what your position on this would be if it was in fact the same man in the pictures w…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 10:07 AM
3

It's a complex analogy to make, I'm not sure yours quite holds up. The key difference is that you are completely ignoring the victim's role in the fraud, in that they willingly forfeited all sense and reason to suspend reality for a thrilling moment of fantasy. Perhaps if you initially see this person from the charity, and they look genuine in the correct uniform and what not, but then ask you to put on a blindfold and place complete trust in them as they guide your hand filling out pledge forms…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:48 AM
8

That wasn't his point at all. Try again.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:20 AM
1

I think it comes down to consent, or rather the acknowledgement of a person's ability or inability to consent based on their maturity, experience, knowledge, and lack of coercion. Homosexuality between two consenting adults clearly has no 'victims'. Whereas I'm sure everyone would agree that an adult in a sexual relationship with a 5 year old, for example, is a blatant exploitation of that child's immaturity and inability to comprehend the significance and consequences of that behaviour. Even if…
/r/MensRights05/05/15 08:18 AM
3

This makes me sad. I wish it wasn't like this, I wish there wasn't this undercurrent of gender warfare in society that makes us so suspicious of each other. It's awful.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 06:36 AM
–

Clarifying title: Turnover was 500k in the first year, but they didn't turn a profit after costs, especially wages which she admitted were well above average to attract her utopic staff. Within 2 years the company was bankrupt.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:34 AM
–

She went out of her way to start a company that exclusively hired women, and she didn't even pause for a moment to consider how sexist that might be. The company has long since gone bankrupt, but we can at least allow ourselves a bit of schadenfreude here.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 03:32 AM
–

"I've decided to major in Gender Studies." "That's good because they've just opened up that big gender studies factory in Green Bay. "
/r/MensRights02/05/15 08:36 AM
5

I saw that, it was beautiful. Looks like it resonated strongly with a lot of people too.
/r/MensRights02/05/15 04:57 AM
2

That went sour fast. Don't you mean they will investigate further and objectively determine whether or not it was gender discrimination? I hope that's what you meant, but that last line made it seem more like a blackmail attempt to ensure he'd get the job, regardless of the truth.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 03:53 AM
–

"Rape causes greatest distress and humiliation to the victim, but a false allegation of rape can cause equal distress, humiliation and damage to the accused." It's refreshing to see this recognised. All too often people focus on "real rape victims" being harmed by false allegations; whilst this is true, I wish more people would be corrected as it's the falsely accused who are the real victims of false allegations.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 10:00 AM
-1

Jesus, they spanked two and flat out ignored the third!? I can almost forgive the ignoring technique, because at least they tried to educate themselves, and at least they stopped hitting that child. Who in their right mind defaults to hitting their kids anyway, that's messed up.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:34 AM
2

It says in the video she wasn't charged. It says this is becoming more and more common and that it's about time they start being held accountable. No shit. It's way past time.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:05 AM
4

Right, but this only emphasises the point. There is more commonly a feeling of revulsion at the thought of the relatively minor and reversible feminine procedure of ear-piercing than the invariably permanent circumcision performed exclusively on infant boys. It may not be the best analogy, though it is only strengthened by its imperfection.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:40 AM
1

Sorry, you're on your own here. Honestly, I don't want to see guys dancing on stage either, I would prefer girls danced up there instead. Just like I would MUCH rather watch male sports than female sports. Appreciate your masculine blessings and let them enjoy and flaunt their femininity.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:28 PM
-2

It takes two to tango. I agree the married woman is more responsible, but nobody ever said otherwise. It takes a certain kind of man to sleep with a mate's wife. Surely you're not implying that "the other man/woman" is entirely without fault in such cases (assuming they know the other party is married, and especially if they are close to that person)?
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:12 AM
1

How do I get the link to it on /r/australia? I don't see it there.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 03:30 PM
–

The more you think about it, the more fucked up it becomes. I don't understand how a desire to reduce STI transmission could ever be used as a justification for infant circumcision. Is it a custom in Jewish culture to get baby boys to screw HIV infected women? Why not not circumcise them as babies, and then if they can't keep themselves out of HIV+ orifices, they can choose to get a circumcision for the arguable protection it might provide? Even if they wait until the boy is 10-12 years old or s…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 09:00 PM
–

I wasn't aware that he had a brother who is a public figure until now. I could hear Christopher's voice, I could even see his mannerisms. I miss him.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:49 PM
7

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. At least if anyone criticises the final product for the colours you choose then you'll know to dismiss them because they are completely out of actual arguments against any of the data.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 11:00 AM
0

Then why isn't it being done? Apparently because of a bias in the court system. I 100% agree with you. We don't want quotas for the prison system though, like some sort of affirmative action that puts a bunch of old Asian women in jail and let out a lot of young black men to balance things out. I know OP wouldn't believe in a system like this, but it's what his post is implying! That's what my issue with this is, it's just a cheap "equality, bitch!" kind of sentiment that doesn't address any rea…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 08:47 AM
4

Honestly, what is your feeling towards this girl and what she did to you now? Has there ever been any contact (direct/indirect) between you where she has had an opportunity to apologise? Knowing her, and knowing that she has had some very important years to mature more now, do you think she even is remorseful; would she have any comprehension of what she's done to you?
/r/MensRights22/04/15 05:04 AM
6

Yep. Fairly irrational argument here. Every reasonable person would agree that the same crime with the same record should attract the same punishment, regardless of race, gender, etc. Are we just going to pretend that males aren't typically more likely to commit crime? Testosterone grants and heightens some wonderful masculine traits, but it also contributes to increased aggression, competitiveness, etc. Why not target the social influences that may disproportionately encourage vulnerable men to…
/r/MensRights22/04/15 04:54 AM
1

It's a bit paranoid to think that feminist trolls are putting on an MRA mask and attacking this person like some kind of double agent. Shouldn't matter anyway, it doesn't make the legitimate argument any less valid just because some people have gone rogue. We should be charged more at the beginning, and it should reduced [or increase] based on our merits as a driver I completely agree. But if insurance companies are free to charge whatever they like for different people (as in the case of this g…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 10:21 AM
–

I understand that it's very common, and that there's no way of knowing who did it. I really really hope that it's not anyone who did it with the impression that they were helping the cause. It seems unlikely to me that this timing was a coincidence. We pride ourselves on objectivity, reason, logic and maturity, and with good reason. You'll never convince anyone by attacking them, indeed it's very harmful for one's credibility. If there's a good argument against their behaviour, then everyone oug…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 07:17 AM
2

If the dominant Feminism was actually about any of this, the world would be a much better place.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:15 AM
7

I wonder how this is different to pubs and clubs discounting drinks/admission for women. Can someone explain? Maybe it's desirable for a gym to have a lot of female clients because males follow (even if they have to pay a little more)? And I still believe this could've been handled better. Politely raising public awareness and discouraging people from going to the gym would've been a better way to go. Simply don't give them money. They can't maintain sexist membership costs if there are no membe…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 05:09 AM
1

Why? I doubt it would even happen, and if it did, it would be fairly insignificant. The company that rejects talent for arbitrary reasons and knowingly selects poorer candidates will not be around for long. I know which I'd prefer...
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:41 PM
1

I'm not too concerned about that, to be honest. As long as a person's political views have nothing to do with their ability to do their job, there's no reason to have such a policy. And most people realise that; certainly every good manager knows it. And that's why I'm not concerned. The tech industry is about the closest thing to a free market we've got. By rejecting people based on irrelevant traits, all she's doing is potentially denying her own company access to much of the talent in the ind…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:27 PM
2

Who in their right mind would? I don't blame women for not doing it, no matter how strongly they disagree, and hugely respect the few who do. They passively reap the benefits of it (short term benefits; I know it is very harmful long term) and it's not their responsibility to stop the crazies. And what man in his right mind would? It's social suicide, and it may even be professional suicide. There's a good reason why high profile men are completely silent on the issue or support it. How do you t…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:43 AM
7

Oh of course. I knew that but I didn't realise Pao was one of those "first name" identities now like Oprah, so I missed it. Speaking of which, I was confused because I was wondering what Ellen DeGeneres had to do with this!
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:34 AM
2

I know you're joking but you're really not helping this sub with comments like that...
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:31 AM
2

Reminds me of Modern Family where they're trying to get Lily into an exclusive school and they realise they have no chance when in comes an interracial lesbian couple, one in a wheelchair, with an adopted African kid. Here's the last bit of their interview: http://youtube.com/watch?v=gXSaI2c0vQY
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:29 AM
2

It looks like another attempt by feminism to try and achieve equality of outcome instead of equality of opportunity and it will do nothing but destroy these kid's concept of fairness. Hit both nails on their heads. Handicapping your peers is not an honest step towards equality. Usain Bolt would probably give up on running too if he could only wear lead boots. And this plants a seed of injustice in these young boys' minds that may never heal. You don't even need to leave this very thread to see t…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:21 AM
0

Did you go to a public school? I'm not sure if that's relevant, I ask only because I was fortunate to go to a good private school. I had all female English teachers there, for 6 straight years, a fact I only realised now as I considered this topic. And they were all fantastic. We were all graded fairly; to do anything else would be unconscionable. In fact, a few classmates gave me a bit of light-hearted grief because at times it seemed one particular teacher adored my writing style and would alm…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:14 AM
1

And I should hope not. Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:06 AM
6

I believe that's what they call a pre-emptive strike.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:59 AM
1

Some even go to court, right Ellen? What's this reference?
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:57 AM
16

It's probably genetic. Pregnancy runs in my family. My grandmother had it a few times, same as my mum. Now my sister has her first bout.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:18 AM
–

A wild thought appeared: What if they got a bunch of female officers to respond instead? Rather than being "rescued" by other men because he's not "man enough" to protect himself, is it possible this could present a powerful image of women standing up to one of their own to denounce her abusive actions? I can't quite put my finger on it, but something about this scenario is, to me at least, so much more meaningful and serious than if a bunch of men in riot gear knock the door down and tell her e…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:08 PM
–

FYI "r" is for subreddits. Use "u" for users.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:00 PM
1

Agreed. Taxpayer dollars put him there, tax payer dollars will compensate him for it. Taxation can go to hell but that's a discussion for another day.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:36 PM
3

It's terrifying to think that the finger-wagging of two children (who are understandably in absolutely no state to be thinking clearly) can result in an innocent man spending 29 years in jail, just because he probably looked something like the sick fuck who did this. And if the cops were this keen to pounce on a conviction, I get the impression those kids may have been "encouraged" to pick their attacker out of the few awfully unfortunate men who were gathered for the lineup.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:20 PM
2

Towler was sentenced to life behind bars in 1981 for the rape of an 11-year-old Lakewood girl and an attack on her cousin, a 12-year-old boy. They identified Towler as the assailant after Metroparks rangers arrested him in as a suspect. Well, you're right, but I refuse to hold traumatised 11 and 12 year olds responsible for this. That should not have been enough for a conviction, but maybe that's a bit idealistic. A good lawyer would've made their identification worthless, especially if my imagi…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:15 PM
–

This! The title is so misleading and falsely enraging that I think it needs to be changed immediately. The victim was raped. Indeed, this man was only able to be found innocent because she was raped, because his DNA did not match the sample collected. The victim did not make a false accusation. She correctly and honestly reported that she was raped. This video is all I know about this case so please correct me if I'm wrong. For example, if she had positively identified this particular man as her…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:46 PM
2

Sure it's different in the physiology of it. But it's identical in that both cases would greatly benefit from not having to park two blocks away if at all possible. That's the issue here.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 07:16 AM
3

Imagine how you would go about describing a suspect to police in this world where zero individualism is recognised/allowed and every person is stripped of their identity and fused into this collective glob of indescription. "Xe was... Um..."
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:25 AM
10

We have special parking places for disabled people, and everyone seems ok with that. I've never been pregnant (being a dude and all) but if I was I think I would really appreciate a close parking spot. I'm ok with that. I don't have kids but I do have young nieces and nephews. I love them to bits but I see how they can be exhausting, so they and their parents would appreciate a close parking space. I'm ok with that. I'm a young, able-bodied guy, and I'll happily walk across a parking lot if it m…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:16 AM
11

Nothing says respect and equality like guilt tripping naive men into humiliating and parading themselves down the street, while paying their masters for the privilege. Are collars and leashes supplied by the feminists or do we have to bring our own?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:19 AM
2

I don't see the issue with people wanting to donate to his legal costs. Well, of course I 'understand' it, but we can't preach the virtues of "innocent until proven guilty" and "everyone deserves a fair trial" whilst simultaneously condemning people for wanting to ensure he has adequate representation. And I don't mean this just in an MRA context.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:26 PM
1

Can you explain to me the point of striving for price parity at this gym? We're going to have a bunch of guys giving money to sexist operators who don't want them there. Nobody is happy.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:07 PM
1

Don't be silent then. Raise awareness. Let them know why you're not willing to do business with them and let others know also so they can make a judgement. It's so disappointing to see people run crying to the nearest person with a gun as soon as someone does something they don't like. The free market can deal with this; they'll soon realise their views are incompatible with a civilised society when the gym memberships dry up.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:46 PM
-3

Why? Why are you bothering with them? I think businesses should be able to choose their clients, just as we choose the businesses we want to deal with. Why shouldn't they be allowed to charge more? Or even deny service completely? Why shouldn't they be able to do so based on a person's race, religion, sexuality, gender, etc? Who wants to associate with a bigoted company like that? Why are you jumping through hoops to be able to give these people your money?! Screw them, take your business elsewh…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:15 PM
2

Ah ok, thanks for clarifying. Rarity shouldn't determine legality though, but it could explain why there's no specific mention of it in the law. My point is that it may not be legal for women to do it just because this particular law explicity states that this specific behaviour is illegal for only men. Maybe it's telling that they considered it necessary to specifically outlaw it for men, but this does not necessarily imply that it is legal for women. I think I understand German culture well en…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:03 PM
–

Don't these things usually use male pronouns as gender-neutral terms?
/r/MensRights06/04/15 10:56 AM
–

Ironically, the only mention I've seen of her in the media has been here on reddit, and it has been 100% negative.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 03:06 AM
3

Yep. This seems like a troll post. Disappointed to see it being upvoted. I get what OP is going for, but it's really misguided.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:08 PM
1

Why oh why did that man apologise? He really passed up an opportunity here, and that is so disappointing. Well, I don't actually blame this specific guy for apologising. He's got bills to pay and doesn't want to further stir up the awful people who might be motivated to have him fired, and that's the problem. He can choose to throw his pride and values out the window, or be an unemployable "misogynist". That's not much of a choice, and fuck the people who have made it this way. Every time someon…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 11:32 AM
1

This is shocking
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:33 AM
–

Why do they do that anyway? It's like when something bad happens to a woman - any woman - they want to make it into a gender crime so that it is a crime against them. When a woman is murdered, they get to be a victim as well! They get to be offended as well! All the perks, none of the actual misfortune. Huh, makes sense now.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:11 AM
5

his mother shrugs I know it's hypothetical but what kind of shitty parent does this when their child ruins another's toys again, even after being politely told not to? The author seemed to suggest that this is the usual response in this situation. I think the author needs a therapist.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:22 PM
3

It's strange (but still really nice) to see an article nowadays that isn't trying to pit women and men against each other with an apparent craving for catastrophic social decay. I wish we could see more of this positive "let's all love and respect each other" instead of "it's you against the world; kill or be killed". Yeah I'm probably being a little dramatic but it pains me every time I see articles provoking men or women to be morbidly suspicious and antagonistic in their perceptions of the op…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 06:46 PM
8

The worst part still is that it's not even a valid counter-argument. Who cares who's saying it? If Adolf Hitler came out and said "It's wrong to kick kittens" then we don't dismiss it as automatically wrong because Hitler said it. I'm a sweaty nerd with an occasional neckbeard. That doesn't invalidate every opinion I have. I wish they were called out on this more often.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:42 AM
–

Gender Terrorism I actually lol'd
/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:39 PM
–

I saw this on TumblrInAction. Comments suggested it was a male hitting him (look at the hand, if that's anything to go by) as a joke. I haven't even bothered to open up Twitter to check out the account so don't pay much attention to me. edit: Yeah I've had a look now. So it was this Alejandro guy doing the hitting, and he has been basking in the limelight ever since. Plenty of Tweets to him from feminists expressing their love for him, but honestly there's so much teenage crap in there I can't e…
/r/MensRights05/02/15 01:32 AM
3

Yeah the title rustled my jimmies but she was fair and reasonably gender neutral. I don't even disagree that this is pathetic. I just wish we could view women screwing their ex husbands over in court the same way.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:30 AM
5

I found this really interesting: I’m not privileged. I’m oppressed. All the evidence is FOR me. That's a really interesting insight into the way they think. They crave oppression. Imagine if a suspected murderer in court said "I'm not innocent. I'm guilty. All of the evidence is FOR me." No, that's AGAINST you (unless, you know, you want to feel like there's a campaign against you).
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:12 AM
1

Oh wow that is revolting. Having the right to screw another guy and make your hapless partner foot the bill is women "having the last laugh" over men. Oh my god.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 08:47 PM
–

It blows my mind that this is not a thing already. Surely this will go straight through? Imagine having the audacity to publicly challenge this.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:30 AM
–

"Getting away with" what exactly? The only bad thing this guy did, as I see it, is to have beein involved in taking the photo (I'm led to believe the girl was not aware that it was taken, otherwise there wouldn't even be a problem with this) and shared it with two female friends. I'm relieved that he is intelligent and reasonable enough to acknowledge that “I will not live with the guilt of someone passing away, but I will live with the guilt of sending the picture.” What a bright kid. She kille…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 07:20 AM
5

I loved playing with Action Man when I was a boy. I'm now 6'4" with an 8-pack and arms like tree trunks, with the face of a thug and eyes of a poet. It's all flat between my legs though. Not recommended.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 02:44 AM
4

That line was rubbing salt in the wound. It had that "You go girl!" vibe that is just vile in this context.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 08:19 PM
-6

Talking snakes and a magical carpenter demigod (who you owe your life to) does seem a little bit crazy, doesn't it? Don't forget to lower your pathetic self onto your knees every night and remind the all-powerful eye-in-the-sky how indebted you are to it for allowing you to have a life. I love how reddit really shows its inner 'Murrica whenever they are reminded of the insanity of religion. Downvote away! It doesn't make it any less true!
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:16 AM
12

I checked out the LuLu website (never heard of it til now) and it seems males can only have their profile on there by voluntarily making one, and can immediately remove it at any time, no questions asked. It seems a vain and narcissistic method of getting vague anonymous feedback from the women in their lives, and the LuLu creators basically advertise it as such. The "best" guy for last year had 49 reviews, with the rest of the top 10 in the 20s. Hardly a huge userbase. So all of this is consens…
/r/MensRights22/12/14 07:44 AM
–

Exactly! When a father commits violence or murders children she sees it as an assault on the mother. "How dare he do that to her children!" Then when she mentions mothers killing most newborns and infants, she tries to excuse and trivialise it by saying that they usually suffer from postnatal depression. So!? Are you saying that infanticidal fathers are of sound mind and somehow more responsible than mothers? "Well, she brought the child into this world so is it really that bad that she takes it…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 10:16 PM
1

Oh come on. This is very petty. Feminists may as well come out and cry that advertising girly crap like shoes and puppies is condescending and sexist. That's all it is. A harmless ad that is making a light-hearted and exaggerated appeal to gender stereotypes to sell licence plates, but not in an offensive way. It's suggesting that girls can get really feminine plates to deter the manly men in their lives from wanting to be seen driving their car, thus "man-proofing" it. Maybe some women want hig…
/r/MensRights19/12/14 08:03 PM
1

That's not fair. Would you groan and complain if some of them thanked MRAs or men's groups? You don't know their story. Not all feminism is bad news.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 09:46 PM
29

And her lawyer cries "Think of the children!" Maybe her client should have thought about whether she and her partner were ready and willing to be committed parents when she spat out the semen, scooped it up and put it where no man was apparently insane enough to deposit. The man is the dead-beat dad; the man is responsible for these incredible circumstances; the man is responsible for this woman being batshit crazy. How is she not successfully sued for every penny she owns, imprisoned and/or inv…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 09:49 PM
6

No mention of paedophilia? A 13 yr old boy is still very much a boy. I'm sometimes a little torn on these 16-18 yr olds getting involved with older predators, but there is no doubt in my mind when the clock goes back those few extra, very important years. There is a very big difference, biologically, between a 13 yr old boy and a "young man"; I've never met or seen one I could describe as being both, or even somewhere in between. For me this goes beyond statutory rape. She is a paedophile.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 10:16 AM
1

Noooo! Don't send her back here!
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:14 AM
5

I saw that and laughed. I don't think they realise what that means. Using /b/ to get votes is a reasonable justification for disqualification, and we've seen countless examples of this before (I vaguely remember Mein Kampf being voted book of the century or something?). edit: Yup, close enough: http://imgur.com/a/9KEW0
/r/MensRights30/11/14 02:26 AM
1

Thanks for this comment. I saw a very quick peek at Blanc's work and was appalled, and frankly I wasn't at all disappointed when here, in Australia, he was told he was no longer welcome. You've made me realise that that's not necessarily justification for preventing someone access to the country. I can't imagine how upset I would be if one of my idols was disallowed entry because others opposed his/her views.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:55 PM
4

I'm getting really tired of these 'Social Experiments'. How long will it be before someone gets really badly hurt, and how many more people do we need to offend and misrepresent with these stunts. What's most alarming to me is that these kids don't seem to realise that "Oh it's for Youtube!" is not a universal excuse or grant them invulnerability. Just watch their video with the bomb threat and you'll see what I mean; he was lucky to escape with only a broken nose considering that in some cases …
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:42 PM
40

But that's my point, really. It literally takes 10 minutes to click the subreddit and have a quick look here. I don't understand how people could be so lazy and gullible that they completely believe someone else's biased opinion of a very large and reasonable group of people than to simply take a few minutes of their time and see for themselves. I don't get it. And you don't even need to look here. Do people seriously not see the incessant feminist dogma littering seemingly all forms of media an…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 01:08 AM
10

A major part of Men's Rights (in my opinion) ought to be anti-feminist awareness and activities. This is one of the biggest responsibilities and challenges that we are burdened with. It is radical feminism which is eroding, or at times blatantly attacking, by both undermining the abstract concepts of masculinity and 'manliness' in our culture as well as supporting and pressuring more tangible degradations of men's rights through legislation. And so when people say that Men's Rights seems to be a…
/r/MensRights16/11/14 01:00 AM
88

I wouldn't ever picture myself posting on /r/MensRights, frankly I thought you guys were a bit OTT Why did you think this, though? Had you never stopped in and checked out the sub before? I never understand why people think this way.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:13 PM
2

I hope you reported the girlfriend one as well. They're both vile.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:55 AM
3

On a related note, I was pleasantly surprised to see Football Manager 2015 has incorporated Movember. In the game, players grow a moustache for the duration of November, and it provides a quick bit of info about the charity with a link to the website.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 07:17 AM
110

To all those asking for proof: http://i.imgur.com/Id4FP9s.png
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:39 PM
3

Wow, ease up on the testosterone there, big guy. Nobody is questioning your alpha status, we're all friends here.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:14 AM
7

Do they know what diversity means? Do they realise that if everyone is a black female that is not high diversity?
/r/MensRights19/10/14 10:49 AM
13

The 'Exposing' bit is my favourite. It has such negative connotations, but really doesn't make any sense here. Please come here and 'expose' us! I beg you! We're not hiding, there's no secret agenda, there's nothing but legitimate concerns held by decent men and women to be found here. Please just Google MRM or have a chat to someone or do anything to actually investigate it. We really want to expose ourselves to you (trigger warning)!
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:09 AM
2

I agree that you should feel like that...
/r/MensRights14/10/14 07:59 PM
9

Nice to see my home town in country Australia getting a mention here. Dad is involved in running a shed associated with the church he goes to and has been seeing a steady increase in the number of local men getting involved over the last couple of years. I'm not terribly close to my father but I highly doubt anyone there gives any thought to the notion that it is "permitted/tolerated by feminists" as some other commenters have suggested. My point being that I doubt they give any thought to the p…
/r/MensRights11/10/14 04:06 AM
1

Poor things, I hope they get the help they need.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 03:16 AM
17

I don't think there's a problem with believing people. I'm an extremely sceptical person and yet I would certainly try to be sympathetic and understanding if someone made such claims, rather than doubting. I would prefer to have faith that the liars will be exposed, as in this case, and have them adequately punished for their crimes. In situations where they name and blame an innocent party as the perpetrator(s), that is especially heinous as it is no longer a victimless crime. These should be t…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 02:07 AM
1

It's just an insecure woman projecting some crap. Don't pay any attention to it.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:24 PM
36

This this this! Bingo! I can drink far more than I should without raping anybody, and it blows my mind that some people apparently think sobriety is the only thing preventing this gentle young man from turning into a violent sexual predator. I might run my tongue and lose some friends, at worst I may be a little too confident and forward in my clumsy advances; but I assure you I could never hurt someone, rape someone, or bomb a building just because I've had a few drinks.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 08:07 PM
4

Yea it's my fault for fucking crazy Yep. but we've all been there Nope. I wrote a scathing criticism of your behaviour but I would probably be banned from reddit if I posted it, so I deleted it. Your behaviour and life choices make my sick. People like you with these vapid lifestyles are a scourge on civilised society and it saddens me that you continue to pollute the gene pool. I sincerely hope you're trolling.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:54 PM
2

Dad?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 06:23 PM
3

But who are you to decide what's in a woman's best interest? I would actually argue that it is clearly advantageous to go after the best of the best. I do understand your point, but I hope you understand that you aren't going to be able to reverse millions of years of evolution by politely pointing out to an attractive young lady that she may as well just marry you because you're confident that she can't do any better. Some examples would really really help to support you here. I'm sensing that …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:37 AM
1

There are some horrifyingly dysfunctional relationships out there. I don't even know how you could call someone your 'partner' if you aren't willing or able to talk about these things.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:29 AM
–

I see your point. It's a decent message in the one addressed to women, but (if we apply the same standard) the men's one does overstep the line. Why should a man be well groomed if a woman shouldn't maintain her figure? Is it really emasculating to not enjoy reading? Should we still be expecting men to give up their seat for a woman (and does a real woman give up her seat for a man)?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:18 AM
-1

It's difficult for me to really understand your situation without some concrete examples. Would you mind sharing one or two? They were taught from a young age to go after wealthy alpha males who can provide them with a better standard of living. This is unfair. How can you possibly condemn people for seeking a high quality partner? I would go a step further and say this isn't even 'taught' but innate. I can't help but notice the ironic 'privilege' implicit in this sentence (why do you expect a l…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:07 AM
0

But the scourge of religion often puts people in a situation where abortion isn't an option, under the threat of eternal damnation. Because Jesus would rather all the children be abused and unloved in strangers' homes. I can't believe it's 2014.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:47 AM
6

Disagree. In a previous Tweet she says she is "working for the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and The Empowerment of Women". It's natural that she will speak out for the women affected. It doesn't mean anything about her feelings towards the men involved. Maybe you're disappointed about the lack of high profile men speaking out against the exploitation of men involved in this incident? That's not Emma Watson's fault. And, frankly, the fact that I wasn't even aware that any men were in…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:39 AM
3

Haha she is INCREDIBLE! For those who cbf watching: He told her to go away when she turned up uninvited at his home while she thought he would be away (her admission) and then followed him inside his house armed with a pistol, machete, multiple knives and batons (all in a duffel bag) and wearing an ammo belt and bulletproof vest. She claims she had all this gear because she was off to a gun convention soon after. She smashed up two computers, several iPads and mobile phones with a baton and then…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 10:01 AM
2

I dunno, just a random girl posting shit on Facebook and you went full righteous on her. You're not going to achieve anything but sore fingers and a headache, so it's probably best just to ignore her and her friends who invariably reply "u ok hun?" or "inbox me xoxo".
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:12 PM
1

You literally cannot fathom the concept that a woman can be the initiator of sex. It's like your brain is hitting a wall that you've constructed for yourself and refuse to look past it. It may be really difficult for you to understand, but please recognise that women are people too. At least respect them enough to acknowledge that they aren't all fluffy dimwitted playthings strewn around for your entertainment.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 03:43 PM
1

Ok, I thought that was sarcasm. But why even post if it's not a big deal?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 10:21 AM
5

I'm not quite sure how to put this nicely but you're being ridiculously sensitive. There are plenty of legit causes to get behind and yet here you are trying way too hard to conjure something from absolutely nothing. Maybe they meant 1.9 is close to the average of the other source's recommendations: 2.6. Or maybe they didn't. Maybe they just didn't think much about it at all. Anything is more likely than this "men aren't people" conspiracy.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:39 PM
2

Great stuff. Message me when you accept Bitcoin.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:10 PM
2

Talk to someone other than your family if they can't understand. If you're serious about hurting yourself then I don't care what the cause is. I don't care if you want to hurt yourself because Manchester United lost on the weekend or your toast was slightly burnt or you're suffering from serious chronic depression. Whatever the cause is, please speak to someone who will respect you enough to lend you an open ear without judgement. With respect, if some bad news is having such a dramatic effect o…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:03 PM
1

Have you tried talking to her about these issues, going to therapy or marriage counselling together, etc? I'm going to assume that she isn't a horrible person who brilliantly maintained a facade for 5 long years to convince you to marry her; and I'm going to assume that you have the sense to evaluate a woman while/before committing to a long term relationship, having a child together, and marriage. The cheating must have set some alarm bells ringing in your head, but you still married her, right…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:18 AM
3

Can we not just appreciate a great dad? (I don't like the cheap shot at Jezebel, it's a bit antagonistic)
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:26 AM
–

The way he turned it back on his detractors was amazing. What a response.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:14 AM
2

I'm going to need a source on that one. Sounds like some serious paranoia you've got going on there. Honestly I'm not even clear on what you're saying. What is this 'parent organisation' that these feminist double-agents are supposedly recruiting vulnerable men for? Sorry if I missed the joke.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:13 PM
2

I'm not questioning your morals, in fact I commend you for your resilience. I share a similar view with respect to infidelity, in that I absolutely will not ever tolerate cheating of any degree in my relationships (sounds straight forward to us, but it amazes me how much people let their partners get away with). I would never do that to someone and so I expect the same in return. I'll get to my point though. Don't you think it's worth giving people a pass for past behaviour in unrelated relation…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:53 PM
5

Would it be possible to exclude or clearly highlight ones with a religious affiliation? I appreciate that they are trying to do the right thing by addressing 'spiritual needs' but it's misguided and potentially harmful (in my opinion) to use gods/sin to try to treat and explain psychology and the effects of abuse. (I wrote a whole rant but decided not to post, this isn't the place. tl;dr- It's exploitative; it's an 'investment'; genuine good would be to provide the support with no ulterior motiv…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:11 PM
7

Plot twist: OP is actually Brandon. Got himself in too deep after stirring up the Tumblr nest, created lie to make it seem like someone else was using his identity to troll them. Now wants sympathy and to discredit the whole fiasco.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:14 PM
3

See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2dopd0/man_secretly_films_his_girlfriend_abusing_him_for/ Some really good discussion there, such as guys who have been in similar situations and why they can't/won't/don't leave (which, admittedly, is something I struggle to understand).
/r/MensRights22/08/14 05:06 PM
3

Insane. I don't want to believe this. This is satire, right? And in the linked article that detailed it further she joked about maybe needing another drink after that horrifying ordeal, and I loved the subtle yet dramatic "I think so..." in reply to a concerned waitress' "are you ok?" Reality check: She was at a bar. Alone. A random guy made brief, polite conversation with her. Maybe he was hitting on her, would that be so wrong!? Maybe he was a genuinely interested investor having found that co…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 04:47 PM
3

He murdered his girlfriend's baby boy with a shoe and a bottle because he felt jealous/rejected when she sanely refused to have his child a few weeks into their relationship. Find me the exact same scenario where a woman got off with a lighter sentence? Even then, I would be up in arms if she only got 9 years. This guy is really deeply messed up. I don't even know if rehab could solve this, he is a serious danger to the community. I'm guessing that being the son of a magistrate helped him to a v…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 03:50 AM
4

I don't believe the numbers I'm not sure what you were hoping for then? Anyway, it's not so much about the numbers as the attitudes towards it. Frankly I hate the way some MRAs and feminists seem to turn stats into some kind of sick competition to win the victim award. Getting back to my point: The misconception that men cannot be raped and/or that women are literally completely unable to be the perpetrators of this crime is incredibly sexist and very harmful. I always like to flip genders, thou…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:23 PM
2

I agree on the technicality here. It's unfair to expect someone to be able to immediately refund payments volunteered throughout the childhood. He should be able to sue her though. I know in practice it's effectively the same thing, but it seems more reasonable to me from a legal standpoint.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:02 PM
1

Unless you have a static IP, just reset your router.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:40 PM
2

I think you're missing the joke... You might want to educate yourself by checking out /r/RedditArmie Edit: And here we have them discussing this exact 'campaign': http://np.reddit.com/r/RedditArmie/comments/2dyqoi/too_far_guys/
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:32 PM
3

We get the 'humor', although it's not really a laughing matter. She has every right to go to a sex club and expect to be able to watch, engage in consensual sex or just socialise... without expecting to be raped! I would really like to hear his side. It seemed he had some supporters, they were in 'the playroom', and her quote gave me the impression that she may not have made it clear that she was not consenting (ie. she was 'paralysed' and so probably didn't say "no"). It seems plausible that he…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:45 PM
1

Yeah I don't have your sources but this is almost exactly the mentality and environment that I was imagining. For every guy spiking drinks and hoping to get some arguably-consensual action, there's probably a girl looking to get plastered so that she might attract the attention of such a guy. For every guy saying "it's not rape because I bet she wanted it" there's probably a girl feeling proud of herself for bedding such a popular guy. It's a cesspool of emotional and sexual dysfunction; a moral…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:15 PM
–

Reasonable force, no matter the genders involved. If you're significantly bigger/stronger and they aren't a significant threat, restrain them. If they don't settle down relatively quickly, you'll probably want to release them or call for help else it could look worse for you. If you're smaller/weaker or they pose a significant threat (eg. armed), run for the hills. Some guys here seem to think that it is morally acceptable to deliver a fist full of equality at the slightest provocation from a fe…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 04:00 PM
–

I didn't get that message at all, in fact it seemed fairly reasonable. There's nothing evil about focusing on women's issues in an article; unless I missed something it's not implying that males' college lives are all sunshine and rainbows, it's simply not about them. I can write an article about pigs suffering animal abuse without the bovine rights activists criticising my research because cows are abused too. I was a little torn about the actual research itself, however. On the one hand I was …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:40 PM
1

Are you David Thorne? You must be trolling with these designs.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:22 PM
1

Not necessarily, alimony very often achieves a fair settlement when the mutual agreement of marriage breaks down. It runs into problems, however, when unscrupulous divorcees take their wealthy ex for everything they can possibly get their hands on, beyond what a reasonable person would consider fair or just. For example, if Brand had been an unknown househusband, we might consider it fair and reasonable for him to take a small percentage of that for his role as her supportive partner throughout …
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:02 AM
3

I feel as if punching someone with enough force to break bones and knock them unconscious is a massive overreaction, regardless of the genders of the people involved. I agree with the DA that his response was disproportionately violent and not aligned with what I would consider reasonable 'self-defence'. I strongly hope to see a very light punishment for him, however, given that it was obviously provoked.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:08 AM
6

Where do you think they come from then? Kidnapping boys has been going on for as long as Boko Haram has existed, else there would be no kidnapped boys to make up Boko Haram. It's as if some people think these men just spawn out of nowhere to kidnap girls ('the real victims').
/r/MensRights17/08/14 05:01 AM
2

I'm hoping it's just a few trolls or misguided, angry men. Their outlook on life is depressing, and does little for the MRM cause.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:17 AM
0

Haha I didn't realise I was any of those things, thanks for the analysis. I hope you find happiness one day.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 03:14 AM
–

Well, that's a relief! Now I can go to bad neighbourhoods in my mankini, alone, and drink til I pass out without fear of the consequences. #datprivilege
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:29 PM
0

It's language. It wasn't so long ago that 'trousers' was considered so offensive that 'unmentionables' was used euphemistically in its place. Maybe in a few decades we'll be hearing 'cunt' uncensored on prime time TV shows.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:25 PM
-10

Being a guy, I do care more than you realise, and you'd be surprised by how much of that I agree with wholeheartedly. I just feel that you overstepped the line with the implication that it is impossible to find a good wife who is equally loyal, honest, and invested in the relationship as we would be as decent men. It's insulting to women to suggest that they are all manipulative, conniving parasites just waiting for the opportunity to make your life hell and run to the hills with the cash and th…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:03 PM
5

I'm 99% sure you're being sarcastic, but I'll reply for the 1% chance you've lost your marbles. My parents have been married for over 30 years, and all of my siblings are married or engaged to wonderful people. My brothers are good men, and my sister is certainly not the type to scam someone into depression and bankruptcy. The world isn't all bad. There are some amazing people out there, and maybe you'll find one of them one day who you would love to spend the rest of your life with. You won't w…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:43 PM
-12

I'm a bit worried that this is getting upvotes. I hope it's a joke. Or that by "them" you mean the bad eggs, which is fairly intuitive anyway. There are plenty of good ones out there. If you forget that then you can easily become a bitter misogynist blind to reality, and that's not helping anyone.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 03:15 PM
0

But it was a case of "mutual affection"!
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:53 PM
6

He's unhygienic, we need to clean him! Hold him down while I smear him with mud and hack off his foreskin with this rusty blade! On a side note, what makes anyone think it's unhygienic? I assume this word lost its original meaning pertaining to tribal scarring (eg. Jewish female is shocked to discover her partner is not circumcised, therefore not one of god's chosen people, therefore a dirty, inferior outsider) or its relation to sexual behaviour (eg. Uncircumcised boy discovers the amazingly pl…
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:37 PM
10

... or men wanted the money more. I feel like a study that incentivises the performance of its subjects with money is self-defeating. A millionaire man is going to retract his hand immediately as he has nothing to gain and nothing to prove; a homeless man would freeze his arm off for some cash.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:16 PM
27

Hey, we don't all have as good comprehend
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:10 PM
2

I feel like we're racing toward a situation where college students will need temporary permits to engage in supervised intercourse (the conditions and limitations of which having been discussed, noted, and signed by both parties and an authorised representative prior to initiation of intimacy).
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:28 PM
1

Imagine how bad that mother-son relationship must be for such a thing to occur. Poor boy. It's beyond repair. It sounds like dad is out of the picture, and mum is an emotionally unavailable erratic sociopath.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:23 PM
3

Warning: After this video finished, I left my phone on the coffee table while I quickly cleaned the house before some guests came over. A couple minutes before they arrived, I suddenly heard loud moaning from a happy lady come bursting out of my phone's speakers. I ran over to it and unlocked the screen to reveal that an 'edging on orgasm' audio clip had decided to autoplay after this one. I narrowly avoided what would have been one of the most awkward moments of my life.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 06:37 AM
16

You don't need to post like this though. Do you understand? Post like a decent human being and people might actually read the whole thing without rolling their eyes and spamming the down vote button. You post this immature rambling junk and then complain (often pre-emptively) when nobody takes you seriously...
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:29 PM
–

If an adult man in a developed country can experience this at the hands of surgeons in a hospital, I don't even want to think about how many boys/men out there in far less ideal circumstances have suffered the same fate.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:21 PM
6

And I think it is worth noting that even within that article, there was an implication that mothers are responsible for the majority of cases which one might consider deliberate or inexcusably negligent. Eg. Woman leaves 2 kids to die in the car while she has her hair done, claiming she was "too stupid" to know better.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:08 PM
9

You raised a good point with a decent source (I'm not going to analyse 310 incidents to try to rebut it, so I have no right to argue). Why end on that note though? When this is down voted, don't even try to suggest that it's for any reason other than that unnecessary rubbish, bro.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:02 PM
5

I left this video and continued browsing Reddit for at least 5 minutes before I realised my face was still screwed up, wincing, and I had to deliberately physically relax. All this to reduce the sensitivity so these boys don't have so many "dirty" desires (as if that works). No mention of the infections, amputations and deaths that undoubtedly arise from some of these atrocious 'surgeries'. Fuck this world. Fuck it so much.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:04 AM
–

This. Just because it has a silhouette with a skirt on the door doesn't mean the porcelain functions any differently (this is purely from a practical standpoint; I still suggest not going back there purely because of the discrimination). Be sure to leave the seat up.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 06:06 AM
1

Still slightly better than no breakfast at all.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:21 AM
0

85% got $2.50 or nothing at all. And the article gave me the impression that they knew their individual payout prior to the mutilation, so I doubt the money played much of a role at all (they could have scratched to reveal $0, and turned around and gone home).
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:56 AM
–

You can't really blame them, can you? Imagine the backlash they would get if a rich white boy had full control over girls, whom he exploited and manipulated for his own enjoyment... They're only doing harm, but I don't expect them to be all courageous and stand up against it. After all, they have to make whatever rubbish they think their audience will lap up, and at this point in time, this "empowering" trash is exactly it.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:50 AM
0

Sorry, by "reaction" I meant "negative reaction". Indeed there is a lot of discussion about it, which is fantastic, but it hasn't been very damning. A lot of people have gone as far as to say it's "inappropriate", though I can't escape this belief that everything has been very very tame compared to what I imagine the response would be if the genders were reversed. From what I have seen, many have even come out with this "you go, girl!" attitude which would not sit at all well if we were saying "…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 08:43 AM
1

You're absolutely right. In fact, I realise now that that's what I am offended by. Not what she said, but the reaction (or lack thereof) to it, in contrast with the claims of misogyny in Australia's recent political history.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 03:13 AM
10

As an Aussie guy I wasn't offended by it, in fact I would love if we could all be honest and even a bit crude, especially for the sake of humour. But we can't. If you're a public figure, then the bar is even higher. I truly believe that if a male senator had taken the same approach to his requirements in a young lady, then the backlash would be HUUUUUUGE. There would be outrage and hysteria from people all over the country screaming "MISOGYNY!" What was more shocking was that on the radio later,…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 11:48 PM
2

Why does anyone feel the need to categorise themselves and subscribe to these defined groups? If I say "I am an MRA" then I give misinformed or ill-intended people the opportunity to perceive me in the same light as the very few extremely misogynistic and hateful people who are, rightly or wrongly, also branded with the title of "MRA". I think most people here, if they're being honest with themselves, would admit that they have made that same cognitive association when we hear someone say "I am …
/r/MensRights22/07/14 01:47 AM
3

I had to read it 5 times and consult the comments before it even made sense to me.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:13 PM
0

I ventured there only a day or two ago with a genuine intent to learn more about the issues facing women. I posted about 3 thoughtful comments which either agreed with the sentiment expressed in the OP or sought clarification. The one response I received from a user there (there may have been more, but this was the only one I saw before deletion) was encouraging and insightful. I felt welcome there; I felt that I was contributing; and I felt enlightened. I was genuinely glad to find that most of…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:18 AM
1

he could not let the man go as the law did not cater for such situations There are times where the pages need to be torn up to allow these drones to think like decent human beings for a moment. They would rather an innocent man be branded a pedophile incestuous rapist and locked up in jail than dare to disobey a technicality in the law. What the hell is wrong with these people... The system is there to protect and serve society within the guidelines and with the disciplinary power accepted and s…
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:46 PM
2

I don't have kids, nor do I plan to, and yet I still find the concept of abandoning my children to rebel against the system to be repulsive, irresponsible and obscenely immature.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:25 AM
4

This is really bad advice, please disregard. Hell, you didn't even break the law before and they still screwed you over with an incorrect criminal history. The last thing you want to do is give them more ammunition.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:23 AM
–

Same link as this post: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/26bkl9/new_psa_uses_hidden_cameras_to_show_how_people/
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:09 AM
2

Great video. It even makes me question myself. Would I intervene where the woman is being assaulted? I would like to think so. Would I intervene where the man is being assaulted? Honestly, I'm concerned that I wouldn't. If I were in his position, I'm not sure I would want another man to intervene, because having never been in that situation, I think my naivety prevents me from really seeing him as a man in need of help from others. That's not to say that he's not in a terrible situation, but tha…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:05 AM
128

Sounds like a decent human being, whcih nowadays means you hit the jackpot. Wife up.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 01:25 AM
7

This. It's not illegal in Canada, so why should they not grant her access? I would hope that if a person was facing an obscene punishment in a foreign country for adultery, for example, then no decent nation would deny them their plea to escape. It doesn't matter how much it offends your morals, in Canada's eyes she is an innocent women being persecuted for a legal act.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:22 AM
1

I agree, it really wasn't bad. The most striking aspect was that this couple allowed their marriage to fester to the point where a divorce was more appealing than actually talking to each other. But that happens. And she's happy now. Not every article a woman writes is meant as a personal insult to our collective manlihood.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter