TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bland-fantasie Archive

View 0 posts and 350 comments by Bland-fantasie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There’s a famous story by a woman who got asked out by one of the Google billionaires on a date. When she showed up at his tower, he said “do you want to have sex before dinner or after?” She chose “before.”
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:50 AM
50

The divorce imbalance wasn’t mentioned, but I guess it was dating focused.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:07 AM
7

This is what they do instead of removing the predators from our midst that prey on innocent citizens. Like Bukele did, and now his country has no crime or related safety issues. The west and I guess Korea treat vicious predators like they’re our most treasured citizens.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 01:31 AM
13

No, that’s not accurate. It’s not an ABSENCE of caring. They expend effort to harm men.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:24 AM
-2

All the difficulty you must have in your life, bumbling in confusion, alienating people you agree with, unable to figure out basic concepts even when explained to you. A lot of people like you have poor impulse control and inability to consider even short term consequences from your actions. Is that you? Do you have a fairly long record of charges you believe you didn’t do?
/r/MensRights20/03/26 11:04 PM
-6

I agree with your points. Nothing in my original comments suggests I have a double standard. Your reading comprehension is critically low! You need to get some basic skills or else you will engage in straw man attacks, which is the only logical fallacy actually at play here.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 10:48 PM
-34

Exactly.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:21 PM
-48

Yeah you are part of the problem. And now you can never say you weren’t told.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:20 PM
-57

A lot of people respond to unfair attacks on men by attacking random women who are actually acting like normal humans. It’s divisive on a societal level to take “injustice for men” and instead of opposing it, enact the same injustice on women who didn’t do anything wrong. Little girl is a little human girl who didn’t do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:35 PM
4

Betty White made this joke years ago.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 06:17 PM
1

From the perspective of the innocent populace that were preyed upon by these hyenas, aren’t these the best prisons in the world?
/r/MensRights28/02/26 04:14 PM
4

You’ll get sniped out of your job with a media hit piece, and if you’re just a regular nobody, that’s it. What if you have a mortgage? Basically it’s like a conviction for a social taboo. I’m not sure an aggressive facial tattoo would even be worse stigma.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 01:35 PM
-3

You can’t find ONE woman who wants to get half that house in a divorce?
/r/MensRights31/12/25 03:39 AM
2

Different decades are better for different things. Like you’re in your best shape in your 20s, but poorer than in your 50s. Also you don’t make the same mistakes in your 50s, so you have an easier time of things. Unless your development is stunted by drug addiction or brain injury, but we’re talking generalities here.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 11:13 PM
4

Noble to engage with these questions but my question is, if OP wants to understand why things are the way they are, why not read the last 100 posts and comments? Instead everyone on this post wrote 2,500 word essays explaining their personal angle, but OP could have read all the other 2,500 word essays dating back years, like low-hanging fruits just dangling in hopes of satisfying OP’s alleged curiosity.
/r/MensRights15/10/25 01:27 PM
61

Having a recording of the proceedings may save your life and money and maybe even your reputation down the line.
/r/MensRights11/10/25 10:57 PM
7

Saturating women with propaganda to hate men, to the point it overrides her instincts, has no downside or negative consequences and more men’s tax dollars should be stolen to add to hostile enemy states’ efforts to do more of it. That’s how you get a sane, healthy society.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 01:25 PM
15

You think the democrat base will willingly give up power to those they’ve demonized since time immemorial?
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:12 PM
6

Jeez, live by the sword, die by the sword I guess They were ALL gang members, you say.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 02:29 AM
1

What should the prison gang have done instead, after this guy messed with them?
/r/MensRights22/09/25 08:42 PM
27

Devils advocate question, why didn’t he appear in court to avoid jail? What an easily avoided consequence. Uncomfortable question #2. Do inmates gang up in groups of twelve to beat someone up for no reason? Or was this their first time? I’d request solitary if I went in the joint.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 03:28 AM
3

An employee and employer agreeing on an exchange of labor for money is cooperation, not exploitation. I mean if the employee is slacking or not fulfilling his end, I guess that’s exploitation.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 03:39 PM
0

I only skimmed the first two lines you wrote because your poor reading comprehension seems to result in you whipping yourself into a frenzy. It’s caused you to hallucinate that I said things when I said the opposite. You gotta fix that! Your coworkers will notice and you’ll have a much harder time if you read lazily and then emotionally cry out in mental anguish like this.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:57 PM
-1

You’re correct but also speaking from experience, the sliced baloney still gets the job done. Meaning yes it’s a crime against humanity level thing, but, I think you still live a full life. Edit: hey man, I live in snipped salami town myself. How can you downvote my truth?
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:22 AM
2

If 15% of them did that and the rest were faithful servants of society, I think that would be enough for the current epidemic. Fifteen percent would feel like all of them were demons. The demons are vocal and flamboyant in their virtue signaling. Normal people aren’t, at all.
/r/MensRights13/09/25 05:14 AM
49

Agreed, op is floating a bad premise. Dementia is devastating. Good on her for getting wraparound care.
/r/MensRights30/08/25 02:48 PM
3

If a man approaches a woman who is momentarily captured by a compulsion to be maliciously insensitive to a man making a good-faith attempt to meet her… I fail to see the downside of her immediately revealing to him that she is corrupted by the unearned social and legal power bestowed upon her in our society. That’s info a man needs, the earlier the better. It’s a mismatch of character. Him: taking all the emotional risk in approaching a woman. Good masculine risk-taking behavior. Her: unable to …
/r/MensRights28/08/25 12:58 PM
1

First minute was all rambling.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 12:10 AM
2

Op is complaining about the choice he is making. Or the woman in question is his mom.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 12:23 PM
14

This is valid. Criminalization of natural and normal inoffensive human behavior by feminists sometimes leads us to want to retaliate against innocent women, as if we are confronting their collective hypocrisy. There are no groups though. Only individuals. Isn’t it as likely that the woman doing your BP is a normal person, it’s normal human contact, and by adopting feminists’ anti-stoic frame, you’re actively trying to promulgate a system that destroys innocents? While tacitly affirming this part…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 10:55 PM
5

Although I get your point, this actually increases capacity for men at generic hospitals by freeing up space… …if the government increases the supply of doctors, which is a separate question.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 08:59 PM
17

“What do I care, knock yourself out,” she concluded her remarks, before leaving the press conference into a waiting motorcade.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:09 AM
6

This law sounds like a sword of Damocles the state just wants to hold over men who get out of line with their political opinions. Basic tyranny. And yet the merits of harsh punishments for actual rape remain. The way this law is described here, the law appears to be obliquely connected to the problem it purports to want to solve.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 11:02 AM
1

Yeah, that’s human wiring for you.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:15 PM
1

There you go, if you uniquely can’t improve your education, sense of humor, prosperity, exercise like every other guy has to, then you need to give up as you have chosen failure through inaction.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 12:23 PM
-4

I’ve always noticed that older single guys are identifiable because wives dress their husbands. At least in previous generations they did, I don’t know about now. Old boomer men are usually ramshackle-looking without a wife. Im not sure about this study. No grounds to say it’s good or bad, other than the ~50% credibility scientific studies have, but this one feels bad to me.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 12:04 PM
3

Leftists conflate their literal sexual grooming of children with conservative support of abandoned young men.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 01:34 AM
15

I wish men-only spaces hadn’t been banned. I’d like it if they existed still.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 09:29 PM
2

There are pros and cons to crying. Most men here understand the cons outweigh the pros. The risk outweighs the reward. When a feminist or media or anyone else gives ONLY the good or ONLY the bad, on ANY topic, they’re lying via propaganda to serve an agenda that can’t compete on its own merits.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 02:07 AM
1

If it doesn’t make you money and it doesn’t make you happy, don’t do it.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 01:16 PM
2

What jurisdiction is this in? Your story deserves to be shared far and wide within that jurisdiction that has these laws. You can make a positive contribution by doing that if you wanted - which is not to say you’re obligated.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 02:48 PM
2

What of grace?
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:40 AM
-1

Disagree. It’s valid.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 12:32 PM
6

I don’t know. Not a lot of women are motivated by seeing or getting weiner. It’s like eighth on the list of ingredients in the stew of her motivation.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 05:13 AM
5

Yeah, kids are real good at picking up how things really work.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:21 PM
14

Nice C+ grade 10 essay.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 04:21 AM
11

This will sound harsh, but I’m saying it in a factual tone. This is literally 100% your responsibility to fix. Raising awareness isn’t wrong, it’s just fruitless. Nobody cares as much as the men affected, and it’s in their power to fix it. And if you succeed, you get to be heroes in your history books, and in mine.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 04:03 PM
3

Ooh, people don’t like second-order thinking like this!
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:06 PM
2

What’s MIGA?
/r/MensRights23/12/24 02:34 PM
13

Okay, I’ll send my blonde daughter to backpack across the rural countryside.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:22 PM
10

I think they have a high rape rate. Of course, a stew can contain many meats.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:11 PM
1

This is a bad guy, don’t engage.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 04:14 AM
3

Aren’t both of those statements factually true in certain countries and cultures today? Neither is true in the west and never has been, although these narratives are of course pushed by grifters for their personal profit and power.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:42 PM
4

I can’t believe I’m engaging with this, but birthright citizenship ending and deportations of current citizens are two different things. The latter is not being contemplated by any republicans.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 04:03 PM
3

You could have posted an article that says Trump is looking to deport citizens. That’s how you argue your point: provide evidence. The article you supplied does not say that. Now your credibility is confirmed to be zero.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:25 PM
6

No they’re not.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 06:13 AM
15

That would be 100% fine by most republicans. You help fight and win a war? Citizenship’s been earned.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 05:00 AM
0

Bait post.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:17 AM
3

That is incredible.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:53 PM
12

Even male ideological enemies of men’s rights? I feel little concern or obligation toward them.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 02:04 PM
18

Chucky
/r/MensRights22/10/24 01:01 AM
2

Here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/QuotesPorn/s/eqIeQBT47V
/r/MensRights04/10/24 07:42 PM
7

I’ve heard maybe three of those kinds of jokes in my life.
/r/MensRights26/09/24 03:49 AM
10

You’re going to lose everything without getting a pitbull female lawyer.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 02:25 AM
0

$10.5m plus inflation
/r/MensRights21/09/24 02:42 AM
2

But it’s a climate solution
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:43 PM
12

Probably means human rights commission? Also I’m not sure this post is what this sub is about.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/24 04:56 AM
2

The disconnect between her music (fair to good) and her popularity (billionaire-level astounding) suggests there is some psyop help propelling her perpetual motion machine. They say some three-letter agencies support a lot of high-potential individuals early in their careers, with government contracts and red tape cuts/no bureaucratic oppression, mixed with threats and blackmail, in return for support for those agents when they “make it big.” Rob Reiner, Steven King, Biden crime family and many …
/r/MensRights04/09/24 02:37 PM
11

I’m not saying it’s true or false, but why would you uncritically repost a combatant’s motivated story, published by notoriously unreliable CNN? Whether it’s true or not, this war propaganda, written on a propaganda network, has zero credibility.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 06:13 PM
5

Nothing wrong with this, but it’s gone from a very important issue in the UK, to quaint, in comparison to the issue of the UK government instigating a civil war and then preemptively attacking the British population. It doesn’t reduce the importance of men’s health. Men’s health is just being eclipsed - to the extent anyone in power cared to begin with.
/r/MensRights26/08/24 02:28 PM
3

I just hope they go into genpop.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/24 07:07 PM
22

I’ll hold my breath that Obama’s going to read this and then do something in the four months remaining in his third term.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 04:48 AM
3

I bet they’re on par with single guys on average, including the methods primarily used in both cases.
/r/MensRights14/08/24 12:40 AM
2

It’s not funny, it’s not original. It’s a low-effort NPC insult. Is it part of a pattern of shot-taking and disrespect? If yes, decouple from that person unless what you get from that relationship somehow outweighs it. I think they call that codependency.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 04:40 PM
50

Try to brainwash kids, it’ll go great. If there’s one thing kids don’t do, it’s rebel against authority.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:11 AM
74

Pfft, you’re only saying that based on her track record and subsequent comments.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 12:26 PM
5

Sure. Let me know what the legal privilege is that people get in return for compulsory draft registration.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 01:28 AM
1

What do you mean, “you are at least marginally not human”?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:08 PM
26

Good for them. They’re free to pursue this path. I see no issue.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:36 AM
97

In a nutshell, you’re discussing this with people who are pretending not to know: That guy is crazy. You’re not that guy and you aren’t responsible for what he did. Getting you to accept their frame is about your submission and them gaining power over you.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 05:24 AM
-2

This is all generally bad advice. Pay Dutch I disagree with. If you’re not into her, it’s sort of a consolation prize to dull any potential fury she feels at being rejected. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. On the other hand, if you like her, why not pay? Notno it of obligation, but because it’s nice. She should reciprocate in some way because she is nice. If one of you isn’t being nice, then the other one should end it. Don’t fight others on her behalf. This depends on the situation. Are…
/r/MensRights12/07/24 07:40 PM
16

A government social worker did this?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/24 12:11 PM
3

The best way I’ve experienced is to be not a male.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 02:37 PM
20

OP, you may be interested in reading about the type of logical fallacy you used to argue your position.
/r/MensRights17/06/24 09:10 PM
13

Fake news comes up with a corny, fake opinion? It’s mildly insulting only if you give value to their fake opinion. CNN’s opinion on anything is not worth ingesting. Those guys are all just conventionally attractive. Keoghan is a captivating actor as well. The others I either haven’t seen perform or saw them in Dune 2.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 12:39 PM
2

I think their empathy extends also to violent/criminal men and men from misogynist cultures.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:32 PM
1

I’d read a summary of this, but videos have so much padding, it’s almost never worth watching. “Like and subscribe!”
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:35 PM
-2

If they are, how’s that working out for them?
/r/MensRights09/06/24 07:49 PM
12

You are also drunk now.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:52 AM
64

Found safe and effective by who? Captured regulators? Pharma companies with a profit incentive?
/r/MensRights02/06/24 07:02 PM
1

Seems inappropriate.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:51 PM
1

Seems inappropriate.
/r/MensRights30/05/24 12:51 PM
30

Australia is a failed state pretending to still be a normal country. I’m not surprised this is legal there.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 10:28 PM
1

Unless a psychologist You’re rolling the dice there in a different way.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 02:47 PM
2

Same reason dark ages and medieval people feared and hated the devil. A priest of the religion told them it exists and is the source of all their problems. If the priest didn’t tell them that, the priest wouldn’t get money or power “fighting” it.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 01:19 AM
13

He despaired that he won in court? Is this written by a homebrew AI?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:10 PM
5

I think I can explain a big part of this. Traditionally, men and women both had formal and informal rights, privileges, and responsibilities. In the past 100 years, that has shifted so one gender gets a lot more rights, retains their privileges, but not much more responsibilities. The other gender has lost certain rights, lost most privileges, and retains most responsibilities. The old way is called “traditional values” and is demonized by those who benefit from the new way of doing things. Many…
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:33 PM
1

How can I learn more about this.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:28 AM
5

Well if it’s on 100% politically-compromised, leftist Wikipedia, I guess it’s true.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 01:03 AM
3

You have great resilience. It’s a superpower.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:17 PM
2

Super comment - one adjustment I’d make is think twice about paying rent to keep junk you don’t need. I moved recently (to a house) and threw out a ton of shit, donated a ton, and gave some away. Think about if your junk is worth paying rent on is all I’m saying.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 08:02 PM
9

Two other things: If you check out, your kids will never be okay again. Even if you are ruined financially and emotionally, there is a lot of joy to be had in life. For a long time, a big part of what sustained me was upcoming seasons of tv shows I loved, for example.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:17 PM
23

If you consider yourself as already dead, it opens up some possibilities you may not have considered as viable previously. Taking a big risk with a new venture. Leaving the country so that you don’t have to be financially ruined. I met a guy in Dublin working as a trucker, on the run from ruinous support payments in the UK. You can still video call and write letters to your kids, work and set aside money for them for when they are out of the house. I strongly advise against criminal behavior, bu…
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:42 PM
10

Is the endgame: A. To maximize the female prison population of sex offenders as vengeance for their ongoing under-prosecution B. To “loosen up” on this kind of thing for both genders, like maybe give the teacher a suspension or fire him/her instead of putting him/her in the can Not advocating one or the other. Both have pros and cons.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:38 AM
3

Peak wokism to want to INCREASE female homelessness by 400% to gain parity with men.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 12:55 AM
0

The socialist lies and spreads chaos, hoping to create collapse in society so that - he fantasizes - he can fill the power vacuum. He can’t win on his ideas, which range from idiotically impractical to genocidal, so destruction and discord are the means to reaching his goal. What most motivates the socialist is to hurt those more successful and more intelligent than him, without fear of retaliation. Of course, the banality of his evil and his poor reasoning result in him being purged by his more…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 11:07 PM
1

:|
/r/MensRights06/05/24 10:58 PM
2

“Adult sextortion remains a-ok.”
/r/MensRights06/05/24 03:37 AM
45

I hope you get more replies because the more replies you get, the more likely you will find something that fits. I think there is no person or group that sincerely decides, “I’m going to offer warmth and companionship to a disturbed guy.” This isn’t an insult. Loneliness, no friends, head injury, and PTSD are a rough combination. So what do you do? You have to seek out others in an environment that will allow you to build relationships. I’m around your age. I played DND when I was a kid. I wasn’…
/r/MensRights06/05/24 12:20 AM
10

All media and institutions give their tacit or explicit permission to do so, so it must be okay
/r/MensRights05/05/24 10:06 PM
1

The point is that even with the inflammatory, biased, likely-mostly-fictional, soft-on-crime take from this legacy media story, they couldn’t help but destroy their own premise by explaining exactly why he’s been taken out of circulation. Sane people want repeat offenders removed from society so that law-abiding people can live in peace. If you want lawlessness, there are many countries that will oblige.
/r/MensRights02/05/24 06:13 PM
27

He had previous convictions for dangerous driving, assault, theft and burglary. Myers was arrested, charged and convicted of attempted street robbery. That’s why
/r/MensRights02/05/24 03:08 AM
4

If they run out of guys, they can’t fight the war. So then how will the US military-industrial complex kickback part of its taxpayer-funded contracts to elected politicians? The whole scam falls apart.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 05:48 PM
1

I have some statistics to show you how “equal” men’s responsibilities and difficulties are to women’s.
/r/MensRights21/04/24 02:49 PM
17

He “signed a law,” did he? Such an air of legitimacy.
/r/MensRights07/04/24 12:11 AM
12

“Adult claims she has no agency, is paid for it”
/r/MensRights22/03/24 12:57 PM
1

I get what you’re going for, but 80% is way too high for the general population of men. I mean, enlisted armed forces men, sure. Based on their choice of wives I’d say 80% is low.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 09:13 AM
52

It really constrains male passions of all kinds, this culture. How is it we allow this? If we all decided it was enough, it would be gone in a heartbeat.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:59 AM
54

Nope, it’s just BS.
/r/MensRights17/03/24 05:57 AM
2

They hate this religion. Wokeism, climate alarmism, DEI/ESG, they are okay with.
/r/MensRights03/03/24 02:32 PM
4

Here’s what we have. A subset of women being callous and unnecessarily mean about a feature of some men that is latently and/or faddishly considered unattractive. Height not a universal preference or even a strong preference among women, despite this bundle of anecdotes making it seem like a big deal. A more predictable driver of what women find attractive in my experience is each woman’s own whims; women will seize any rationale they can think of to justify rejecting a guy, when the fact is she…
/r/MensRights24/02/24 02:59 PM
27

This appears to be run-of-the-mill projection.
/r/MensRights18/02/24 12:30 PM
2

This is a great idea.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 08:22 PM
1

That is a good standard.
/r/MensRights12/02/24 05:06 AM
26

I realized recently, a big issue with trans proliferation is the loss of private spaces for women. I personally think that women should be able to have private spaces. But private spaces for men have been basically illegal in the west for decades. This should be corrected. I’ll extend it to say that groups limiting membership based on ethnicity is either okay for ALL ethnicities, or it’s okay for NO ethnicities. In the spirit of freedom, I’d say it’s okay for almost any type of groups to be excl…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 02:43 PM
85

Fuck em, the complainers
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:34 AM
17

That is the takeaway. Not that it’s wrong or right. Just that it’s inconsistent standards. If I had to choose, gun to my head, for society, I’d choose right. Innocent human contact between humans is nice and it’s a bad thing that we have criminalized it with oversensitivity to feigned or perceived offence.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:24 AM
1

I’ve heard this theory, but so far the proponents of that theory, that Ukraine is a domino, looks to me like a fabrication of the government-controlled media. The government that wants support for funding Ukraine. The media that doesn’t report on Ukraine’s corruption problem since the war started. The media that doesn’t report on Ukraine’s institutionalized Nazi problem, since the war started. The media that buried the story of a US citizen critical of Biden, who was just murdered in Ukrainian p…
/r/MensRights27/01/24 01:31 PM
3

I’m judging him based on his words. I can’t really read his mind to see if he’s being disingenuous. Maybe.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 03:43 PM
2

You’re saying this single bad hypothesis should be generalized to all of his opinions? The great majority of which are exactly correct?
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:57 PM
25

A rare miss for Vivek Ramaswamy.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 02:00 PM
1

I withdraw my comment and thank you for the tip.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:22 AM
1

Wrong sub.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 07:44 PM
16

This can be true along with the majority sentiment. It is probably, often, a good thing to do, risking yourself in an attempt to help someone. At the same time, it is not an obligation. Criticizing men for not helping implies that assistance is socially or morally compulsory. It is not, and perpetrators of the view, that men are responsible for risking themselves for strangers’ possessions or even safety, are bad people. But if you want to help someone by risking yourself, yes that is a good thi…
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:46 PM
5

Look at it this way: if this agenda is moral, then in terms of equality, it morally justifies men doing the same. The difference is men would win that fight in one day if they just decided they were done with this nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 01:12 PM
2

Reread the headline.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:36 PM
2

Petitioning Biden seem like an absurdity.
/r/MensRights19/01/24 01:36 PM
4

Increasingly tyrannical western governments is who he is obviously referring to. You thought he was referring to the Burmese Junta?
/r/MensRights18/01/24 02:19 PM
21

Michael from Arrested Development was an exception to this as well.
/r/MensRights12/01/24 04:33 PM
1

Improving someone’s station in life is hard and takes a lot of work and will involve a lot of people failing to follow through on the help they get. That makes program workers feel ineffective. Tearing someone down is grossly unethical, lazy, and doesn’t require talent or innovation, but it’s easy and it does result in a more level playing field. Any thug can do it, and they don’t need intelligence to do it. This is the basis of socialist economic and political theory. I understand the socialist…
/r/MensRights12/01/24 02:43 PM
3

I don’t understand it.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/24 02:56 PM
3

If it was me I would go no contact. You won the lottery by not being arrested by the Australian authorities for being the male victim of an assault. I would have expected them to nail you for being the male victim of domestic assault, to show piety to the intersectional hierarchy. Unless you have intersectionality we don’t know about, like South Asian lineage. That would snap it into focus why they didn’t arrest you as the male victim.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:53 PM
1

They’re either stupid or liars.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 02:13 PM
1

I know she did all that and more, but I’ve never heard that was how she got rich. I’m open to it. But I don’t see how Libya got her cash. Foundation and Haiti, on the other hand, got her CASH. I’m just talking about how these two women got rich by peddling influence in different ways, not about who is more evil or criminal.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 04:53 PM
-8

Sorry to be dark and sarcastic, but at least Hillary didn’t get rich from making more wars. She became rich influence peddling via her foundation, and possibly via trafficking minor Haitians, but at least it was not from sending her country’s own young men to die in some S-hole for no reason other than to make her money. If I’m wrong about any of this, a second Nuremberg trial would sort both of them out. I will apologize if the court shows I’m wrong.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 02:15 PM
1

This exact thing happened to me lots before I quit OLD in 2016. Exactly the same. All the way from chatting to the beginnings of a relationship after several dates and getting ghosted with no contact.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 09:32 PM
37

If there’s one thing that’s earned my trust in the last 20 years, and especially the last three years, it’s big pharma’s newest profit vector.
/r/MensRights19/12/23 05:48 AM
1

The philosophy is a mix of a mass hysteria and a shit test.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 03:09 PM
8

Agreed.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:40 PM
82

Yeah, all that, or it’s hormones wired in from evolution to be increasingly powerful with each generation.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 03:27 AM
2

Traditions are solutions to problems we have forgotten. Feminism is removing traditions, which causes some pretty significant, devastating problems to appear.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 09:49 PM
10

I’d argue you don’t need a majority to say yes. If you have a representative sample and 40% say yes, that’s a huge amount of support for the idea.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 02:35 PM
6

Conservative Christians were last a meaningful political force in the 1990s. It’s a leftist talking point to demonize them that you have apparently bought into. Why?
/r/MensRights05/12/23 01:38 AM
24

Why would you generalize the opinion of one guy on one issue to demonize an entire group that has diverse opinions on many issues? I agree that he’s wrong, but what the fuck does that have to do with traditional conservatives? Learn to think clearly, it’s surely degrading your life in other ways.
/r/MensRights05/12/23 01:34 AM
34

Yeah, NY’s justice system is in reverse. This will end very well for her. Now, a cop arresting a home invader that shot but didn’t kill the homeowner family, that cop better get $2.4 million for a lawyer that will lose his case.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/12/23 01:21 AM
5

How did you come to this certain conclusion? Especially if you factor in that the guy’s life is on the line.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 11:24 PM
6

Hard to watch. •Weird agenda •Hammy acting •Use of cliches as punchlines; generally cringey writing •Unaddressed contrast between characters’ vapidity and the alleged high-powered jobs they have It doesn’t ring true.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 02:25 PM
5

Which would be more likely to result in an inquiry with potential consequences: A. Someone observes that a female judge issues 140+ judgments in a row that strongly favor the woman in divorce/custody dispute. B. Male judge tells a dirty joke among colleagues.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 03:50 PM
5

Yes, that’s right.
/r/MensRights20/11/23 06:13 AM
71

It’s a global dating market. Compete. Also I don’t care for the term “bro.” “Bro” connotes a stupid guy. These guys are showing they’re not stupid.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 08:35 PM
50

It comes down to which sex’s “bad impulses” are tamped down aggressively by society’s sanctioning tools, and which sex’s negative impulses are given plenty of slack. It’s a domineering matriarchy that is assisted by many men who have scarcer and scarcer positions of privilege within the matriarchy. The CEO who allows DIE to rip up conservative men in his company isn’t an admirable guy.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 02:10 PM
8

You should take the high road with these. There is a great chance this person is harvesting “toxic masculinity replies” to her “innocent, polite question” for another agenda, like a college assignment, or maybe something more nefarious. And if it’s a good faith question, then this is uncalled for.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:50 PM
6

I invested in bumble shortly after it came out. I have a lot of experience with online dating, back to lava life in 2004, until I met my wife on it in 2016. I thought, “oh, this system of ‘women messaging first’ is the winning formula! It resolves a major issue women face with getting too many messages, which they all complain about.” Additionally, I thought, almost every woman I’ve ever been with (around 25, for context) initiated things. Every one of my attempts has failed except maybe one or …
/r/MensRights07/11/23 02:09 PM
14

Correct.
/r/MensRights04/11/23 06:15 PM
38

Agree. Who wants to potentially die for THIS? It’s why shithole countries’ soldiers surrender en masse. Why die for corrupt leaders?
/r/MensRights24/10/23 05:11 PM
17

Hmm, a crime loophole that allows you to hurt others without being punished yourself. How could this go wrong.
/r/MensRights24/10/23 01:29 PM
9

Downvoted for non functioning link by spambot OP
/r/PussyPassDenied21/10/23 07:06 PM
23

I never thought of it before that women’s tears takes up all the emotional space among those distressed. It really puts into perspective the denigration men get for crying. Treated as if they are competition, horning in on women’s staked territory as the more-deserving recipients of the majority of society’s compassion. Seems to me men and women are equal in rights, but not yet responsibilities. Not counting the rights and codified privileges that women have that men do not (e.g., sentencing, ch…
/r/MensRights20/10/23 03:34 PM
4

Option A. Simply uphold equal justice and fairness for all. All future calamities are averted. Option B. Violent calamities. I wonder which one they will pick? Oppressors usually see the devastating, biased treatment they dole out and willingly adjust course, don’t they?
/r/MensRights12/10/23 02:03 AM
3

If I had nothing to lose, I might just take justice for myself. But what that means for me and OP could be two different things. And besides, OP may yet have something to lose.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 01:23 AM
17

It probably depends on jurisdiction. I imagine California for example would throw them out as California is not a rule-of-law jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 07:55 PM
18

We’re 80% or 90% there now
/r/MensRights08/10/23 02:00 PM
14

Mating dynamics are effectively illegal for most men now. Very alpha/attractive, and risk-oblivious men (e.g., junkies, cartel guys, some people in power positions like politicians, etc.), are the only ones who are likely not to be criminalized (or who don’t foresee consequences) for doing this outside narrow, ineffective, approved dating markets like the dating apps. Where they also dominate.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 08:32 PM
1

Why did you pick this community in particular? You posted your research project on a bunch of porn subs. Why THIS sub? What was it about men’s rights that made you think, “a likely hotbed of deviant porn consumers,” in your words.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 04:21 AM
2

That last point is real good that you articulated that. I’ve felt that.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 06:44 AM
3

Tell it to the magistrate!
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:37 PM
2

Yes, women are allowed their own spaces but men are challenged when they have their own spaces. Of course, women’s spaces are being challenged from the left now from you know who. Just like only the left may protest, including causing billions in arson damage; conservatives are debanked, doxxed, fired, and jailed for peacefully protesting. Get the message? You’re not in the privileged caste, but those who are in the privileged caste say you have all the privilege and that they are victims. It’s …
/r/MensRights30/09/23 03:06 AM
26

She’s in the right.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/23 02:06 AM
5

What about the stories coming out from his other exes that “journalists” were calling to recruit her? This is taking men off the board ahead of election season when they are being effective at pointing out the problems with the current administration. As Brand was. I’m not even a fan of his.
/r/MensRights18/09/23 11:58 PM
39

False allegations by women against men are none of women’s business and the idea that she thinks she has any moral standing to legislate men’s issues is inappropriate. It would be like men legislating women’s bodies.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 11:35 PM
1

I think I’m using hyperbole here. I don’t know the prevalence, but I do know it’s a nonzero chance, and that men are constantly posting about their perfect, storybook tradwives suddenly flipping a switch and becoming monsters.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 09:02 PM
3

Option A. Give those more support, who never supported you, who mocked you and celebrated your hardship. Option B. Work to enfranchise yourself, and disregard the plight of maliciously apathetic groups newly experiencing oppression.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:06 PM
4

You can’t argue with perfect teeth.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 04:23 AM
9

The west has fully inverted the concept of merit. That’s what we are all experiencing. That’s the source of the despair.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 12:23 AM
47

For any men who ever encounter this, the way it will go is she will break up with you and you will have done it for nothing.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:26 PM
18

No comment on whether this is true or not, but this is not even remotely credible. It’s possible it’s true. It could be a matter of scope. But Ukraine war propaganda is not reputable.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 10:35 PM
4

Weak men create something something.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 02:30 PM
24

Good post. I do wonder what became of her. I imagine it’s whatever would happen in a lawless society with no consequences unless you’re a law-abiding taxpayer.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/23 01:39 PM
12

Here you go.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 05:02 PM
22

I read a great piece yesterday about how women are mercenary capitalists in dating, where they will not personally date down socioeconomically, meaning sharing her resources. But they vote like socialists, for politicians promising to redistribute other people’s money. Maybe we should start reconsidering some changes made in the past 170 years. Not all. Not even most. Just some.
/r/MensRights02/09/23 02:25 PM
1

Correct.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 06:09 PM
13

This is a roundabout way of bringing down violent ruin on themselves. If a father loses everything at the hands of a few corrupt people “following the law,” they expect 100% of men to just meekly slink off? They should have consulted a man when they proposed this.
/r/MensRights01/09/23 01:06 PM
7

When will women get a fair shake in this patriarchy? /s
/r/MensRights25/08/23 12:24 AM
10

The difference here is that no one would consider that an incentive to have blind kids, whereas being paid to sit at home and not have to deal with work is an incentive.
/r/MensRights24/08/23 01:29 PM
-21

Sounds a bit like two wrongs make a right. I know men are getting the short end of the oversensitivity-persecution stick. Big picture, oversensitivity and persecution are bad regardless of who is doing it. That said, what’s good for the goose could be the only thing that makes these tyrants see what they’re doing. Edit: Ooh, sorry for the nuanced opinion.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 11:41 PM
3

THIS is their priority.
/r/MensRights16/08/23 03:51 PM
3

Whatever you do, don’t announce it. Just scale things back to your comfort level. Based on your post and other comments, I would expect your wife to have your back on this and scale back as well. I’m alarmed she would take their side even to this extent. It’s concerning.
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:16 PM
-14

It can be important to a man, and a man can predicate his willingness to commit based on any criteria he wants. But he has no right to know that. Edit: I think people are misinterpreting this. The technical issue is whether a guy has a right. He can leave, or reject her, or whatever. But she doesn’t legally have to tell him.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 02:24 PM
148

Sight unseen, I think this goes one of two ways: Professor debates circles around OP because it’s on her home turf. Not that she would be right, or defeat Jordan Peterson, but she could easily be able to gaslight OP. OP scores enough points that she retaliates with a lower grade, or better yet, a complaint to the DEI office about the student. Now OP’s best case scenario is a bunch of struggle sessions to admit his privilege.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:56 PM
29

Certainly not a corporate creation! Just a popular musician who became famous by writing all her greatest hits nobody can name a single one of.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:45 PM
2

I should have realized that link would lead to a Spanish-language website.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 05:48 AM
4

The subtext of this seems to be targeting a certain demographic of men. Adding a little friction to flirting to get that indigenous birthdate down just a bit. Every bit helps. Nice to see the same cops who didn’t prosecute the Rotherham grooming gangs will be cracking down on this
/r/MensRights15/07/23 01:19 PM
8

Men’s bad impulses are aggressively tamped down by social expectations. Women’s are not, and woke-captured institutions like media, academia, government bureaucracy, defend and champion women’s “right” to behave in ways that are bad for men, bad for society, and bad for women’s outcomes.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 04:53 PM
18

If men decided to take it all back, it would take about a week to set everything right with better outcomes for every individual on every issue that matters.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 01:45 AM
9

I’d like to see the calculations behind those numbers.
/r/MensRights28/06/23 04:40 AM
89

This comment is right. Her apparent unawareness of social norms feels harmless, but it’s not going to be the only thing wrong with her, and some of the other irregularities in her personality are going to be dangerous to you, as the object of her attention. “Hell hath no fury” comes from women who aren’t playing with a full deck.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 03:19 PM
17

I’m sorry for your loss. This seems like unremarkable behaviour on the part of the women who participate in that ideology.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:54 PM
7

Let’s pretend anything about this creative nonfiction story is true. Where would they find these women? Did these gold diggers show up at the newspaper office and shout that they’re looking for a near-death man with a “pension pot”? I know newspapers are close to 100% fiction, but the premise here is absurd. This premise, that the newspaper could locate women with these intentions, who are willing to pose for these photos? I assume they hired models to pose for staged photos that: Most men will …
/r/MensRights06/06/23 01:10 PM
9

Can they really routinely make a female lead an antagonist, petty, vengeful, immature, unwise, and stupid? Michael Scott had brief flashes of humanity but overall was constantly being humiliated by his own flaws. Do the writers avoid this and make her a good boss? What would be the antagonist, toxic-masculine Dwight? Or maybe they’ll make the audience hate Jim. This is sure to be ratings poison.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 03:03 AM
8

Know the rules Aww, you’re sweet. Hello, Human Resources?
/r/MensRights23/05/23 12:06 PM
1

You may not have noticed the long string of disproven allegations against trump. You may have noticed a long list of hoaxes specifically meant to persecute trump.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 06:19 AM
2

What makes you think he’s a rapist? The lack of details about this case? The crowded venue in which it allegedly took place? Failure to report at the time, or even during the first election cycle, but breezily able to report it now and do a media tour in anti-Trump media? Perhaps the Democrat megadonor billionaire who bankrolled the lawsuit? Or perhaps the coconspirators who changed the statute of limitations on sexual assault in New York in 2022 for the explicit reason of going after Trump? Lot…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:50 AM
2

Trump is like three wrong categories to be able to speak freely about sex and sexuality. Typical disgusting Trump, thinking he could talk in public about things everyone talks about in private but that people like Trump aren’t allowed to talk about in public.
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:45 AM
3

Thanks, I agree completely with that point.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:08 AM
5

You forgot the “because” and explanation in your first sentence.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 01:26 AM
1

Less so now that two people have said this. But I believe I’ve heard of plenty of stories where a man was still on the hook after living with his old lady a long time? In California at least? Safe bet they’ll be on the historical wrong side of every issue. Every issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 04:07 PM
22

In US and Canada, if you live together long enough, like 6 months, it’s the same thing. They just consider you married.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:23 PM
12

The trans-celebration movement is the first sustained, successful attack on the citadel of feminism. The trans celebration movement is, intentionally or not, removing some basic human rights or privileges from women, like the right or privilege to feel safe in women-only spaces. Different rights and privileges than are denied to men. Female opponents to this new imbalance do not control the narrative, and are being demonized by mainstream manufactured sentiment. I don’t celebrate this because no…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:20 PM
-1

Not an excuse. You know what you are doing.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 05:17 AM
2

Your son, OP? I would feel terrible if it was your son. If it wasn’t your son, then you should delete this and repost with a fixed title out of consideration for his parents.
/r/MensRights02/05/23 02:54 AM
1

I doubt that’s what is responsible.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:08 AM
38

I hear collapse of society from compromised inside actors will do that
/r/MensRights26/04/23 02:08 AM
11

Imagine if even 5% of men were left during an extermination campaign and the men realized it and formed up to resist. I’m not saying 5 men could beat 100 women in every situation, or even in 10% of situations. But if men organized in the face of genocide, it would end in every hysterical Handmaid’s fantasy coming true for a thousand years. What would make this outcome more likely is that intersectional feminism would probably spare men longest from cultures that are most barbaric to women. They …
/r/MensRights20/04/23 12:46 PM
1

On a list of pros and cons of living in the Soviet Union, I’d say that’s #1 on the list of their three or four pros.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:22 PM
89

They’re happy to hand out white feathers to the men they see.
/r/MensRights16/04/23 03:58 PM
7

That is how they get their foot in the door to award jobs to those other than the most meritorious candidate. The insidious part is they claim “it’s only in case of ties” or near ties, but that isn’t how everyone will apply it. They will use a wider margin. It’s not like they’ll be caught or punished; very much the opposite.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:35 PM
58

The worst part of this is that there is no such thing as two equally qualified candidates. One of them will have more work experience, more relevant work experience, more education, more applicable education, better writing. It’s a falsehood to suggest that there can be two equally qualified candidates.
/r/MensRights08/04/23 03:48 AM
3

Drinks yes. It was their first time meeting I think. I went to sleep in an adjoining room while the other couple and my gf played Mario Kart. I guess my friend’s spouse went to bed also after some time. While I was sleeping, I realized quite some time had gone by with only the title screen music playing on a loop. That pattern tweaked something even while I was unconscious. Hopped up and caught them doing it. I wonder if they were going to work their way up to more.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 09:14 PM
12

I had a gf that went out salsa dancing since before I met her. She was open about it. One night she cringingly confessed to me that a guy kissed her there. I was like, okay, that’s not a big deal. I realized years later, ohhh, she means she made out with a guy. I realized that after I walked in on her making out with a friend of mine at their house we were staying over at.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 02:21 PM
8

Some work can make you more satisfied, fulfilled, give meaning, and add to wellbeing. I’m not sure paid make-woke projects have those benefits though.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:00 PM
1

What’s the gist of it?
/r/MensRights06/03/23 04:20 PM
2

Man, I know how they feel.
/r/MensRights06/03/23 02:20 AM
4

It’s in the interest of both men and women to crack down on this. Women victims will not have their credibility damaged by false accusers “stealing victimhood,” and men obviously benefit from not having their reputation destroyed and being imprisoned falsely.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 05:33 PM
41

I was going to compliment the cop on passing this easy risk-reward test. You would get: sex and an STD Then you would get a literal rape conviction resulting in loss of job/benefits/pension, inability to find work and support yourself, a felony on your record, everyone in your life knowing what you did and that you have literally zero judgment. She would possibly be celebrated by the victim-industrial complex and your crime would mitigate her own sentencing. A Hail Mary on her part, but one that…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/23 01:17 PM
79

Pretty much a perfect analogy.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 08:41 PM
1

A few years ago I would bring up in casual conversation to women, “have you ever worked in an all-female workplace?” And if yes, “How was it?” I won’t bias you with my results. Try it yourself.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 03:01 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 01:32 AM
2

Easy to achieve, implying 100% success? Good to know
/r/MensRights28/12/22 03:09 PM
72

Good post and good sentiment all the way through. Want to see every man in my life in a happy & healthy relationship if they choose to be in one in 2023! Going to be mathematically difficult to pull this off.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 08:01 AM
67

It’s conditioning to make men shut up and accept their ever-artificially-diminishing status.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 05:11 AM
8

It’s decomposing into a failed state in every way that I hear about.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 06:39 AM
8

Perhaps seeing that advancement will be withheld for circumstances beyond your control is being noticed by a growing number of males.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 02:22 AM
1

There is an argument to be made for your alternative terms being true. I don’t know what op meant, but if you are right and that was a sole instance of hyperbole in the post, that would be fine as well. It comes off a little hysterical but it’s not wrong or anything.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 09:25 PM
8

One objection: only fans women don’t steal subscribers’ money via that service. Only willing buyers pay for it.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 09:07 PM
36

Conservative subs omitted from mine. I’d say it’s 80% of the nonsense I post.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:06 PM
139

If they didn’t override its instincts with this, I wonder which way the sexism would go based on its objective observation. Both ways, I assume.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 02:48 AM
87

Remember that guy who was on tv, in the background of the shot, near a bank of payphones in the airport, when his son’s abuser was strutting by in police custody? That, but at the prison gates on release day.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/22 11:47 PM
1

This is just to balance out it being “men” so many years in a row. /s
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:51 PM
8

Yep.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 05:20 PM
90

I have to respectfully disagree that this is a men’s rights issue. She is using her own money. We should be able to use our own money to open a male version. I do acknowledge there is a big imbalance of resources available to DV victims, by gender.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:49 PM
8

It has always been a show about a family that is “comedically” repulsive. I only watched the unfunny trailer. The conceit seemed to be that Wednesday is a surly, abrasive, entitled, unironic-posing-as-ironic sociopath. I never liked this franchise, because it’s never been funny. It’s what happens when a comedy is written by people who have no sense of humor, maybe with an assist from unfunny producers who ruin jokes with their “notes.” The pitch of the show seems like it would have been, “She sa…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 02:07 PM
17

Hahahahaha, get a load of this.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:55 PM
5

I don’t know, maybe not. I was only commenting on the intended consequences of this policy in public. Not denying there are other implications the elites are socially engineering!
/r/MensRights09/12/22 06:24 PM
93

100% of women will enjoy no longer having eye contact or acknowledgement from males in any public situation, so this is great news for women. Women love feeling invisible, which is why they rarely put any attention into their appearance.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:29 PM
1

Men harming other men is not the fault of the victim. Humans harming other humans is not the fault of the victim. Is it intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy behind claims that men deserve to be hurt when it’s other men doing the victimizing? Or just stupidity. Like they literally can’t see it.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 07:36 PM
1

Sorry you’re feeling disgusted with yourself for not doing anything to change the future. Try not to project your insecurities into others.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 01:34 AM
6

Life goes on even when you lose your culture to multiple unchecked fifth columnists and external actors, and your society collapses. There will always be people who will have kids if their crotch giblets are functional.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 02:40 PM
2

Why the click bait phrasing? How about explain what happened in the headline.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:57 AM
5

Construction jobs in the heat, eh? Hmm.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:43 AM
2

This is collective punishment and low character. It’s important for men to stay on the high road and not give the wide array of enemies of men ammunition to use against men.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 06:11 PM
3

Not a lot of stats in her claims. When I read about how men are disenfranchised, it’s ALL statistics. Hmm, interesting.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 12:22 AM
-7

You can’t state what a movement is supposed to be, because you don’t have the authority to control the aims and motives of all of its participants. All you can say is that it is a hydra.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 07:01 PM
27

Men love women. Women love children. Children love pets.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:33 PM
1

I’m sorry for your situation. It’s nice to hear that you have a wife to support you. However, I am not sure of your thought process. You went to the MOST unsympathetic people in the world asking for help, and they used something between a logical fallacy and a lie to deny you, and even possibly harm your chances more. This seems like an expected, characteristic response from them. It is a useful post though - for everyone to know how feminists publicly treat a dying man. Like a concentration cam…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 06:41 PM
12

Maybe they’re losing interest in the risks and penalties associated with the preconditions of fatherhood.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 02:14 PM
6

What are you asking men to do specifically? As in, what action to take?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:48 PM
2

Covert discrimination and overt policy discrimination restricting career paths seems pretty important.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:59 PM
32

I have been thinking about how they won’t target the individual rapist. But they do attack men who call women on generalizing a rare crime to all men. It’s almost like they categorize you as a sacrificial beta because you care what they think enough to dispute it. You are showing respect for their opinion and personhood by engaging with them in an attempt to evolve or improve their thinking. And they attack you for it. Obviously the rapist doesn’t care what they think. And they don’t attack him.…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 04:39 AM
226

Why world they need to game the system to prevent the defence from getting exculpatory evidence? Oh right, quotas.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:24 AM
1

That would be an unprecedented gamble!
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:39 AM
8

You may be right, but isn’t the US policy strategic ambiguity? Seems to me he could well be stating the true US policy, which will be to honor the defence treaty with Taiwan. China is modernizing its military and has stated overtly and clearly that unification by 2049 is happening. Xi has tied his legacy to this issue. US is powerful militarily, but apparently loses every war game in the South China Sea in China’s backyard. It doesn’t make sense that the US would fake that loss.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 01:54 PM
14

Domestic? Looks like it was on tv. Also your comment implies she was an innocent bystander. You didn’t see her attack him?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/22 01:55 AM
6

I wonder if the PM will denounce it.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:10 PM
1

CBD oil is great for back pain as well.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:41 AM
31

This reads like you wrote it while high. Your premise, that your anecdotal experience should give hope to men with vastly more experience than you, is narcissistic and naive. Two attributes of youth I also suffered from much more than I do now.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 02:18 PM
3

Serious question: is an FFM looked on more favourably?
/r/MensRights24/08/22 04:17 AM
7

This isn’t new, historically, to deprive some people of their rights based on an imagined justification. Germany did it during the last world war. Soviets did it during their regime. Slaves have been treated this way throughout history. This is the company these admins keep.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:38 PM
5

Her view is that some human lives are less valuable. The third reich, the slave trade before that, eunuchs before that, all relied on this philosophy, and made arguments to justify it to themselves. That’s the company she keeps. It’s not really a unique philosophy. My real comment is about all the people who proclaim that they would have resisted the third reich if they had been there. Those who resisted the recent Nuremberg code violations imposed on us in the west were mocked and cast out. It …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 01:34 PM
11

If there’s one thing I trust, it’s big pharma’s newest drug designed for the least-valued people in society, and it’s not for a common cold or infection: it messes with your ability to have kids.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:16 PM
4

I hope it’s not in the UK, that’s illegal there.
/r/MensRights15/08/22 02:17 PM
7

This makes a good point: there is a lot of talk about men leaving families, but no talk about men being driven out of their families. So let’s not be so quick to judge men who are separated from their families.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 09:02 PM
39

Silver lining, he won’t be attached to a movie with an audience score of 0% due to wokeness.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:18 PM
3

So the premise of the show is that their show may cure some men of innate violence. That’s their premise.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:03 AM
2

Radical opinions get attention because they are absurd. There are forces in the world who invest time and energy trying to divide the West, America primarily, to weaken it. It profits them greatly and costs essentially nothing to create this style of division. I don’t think they are nearly as many useful idiots who feel this way as it seems.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:13 PM
4

I think they feel it’s fair retaliation against their imagined patriarchy. They feel victimized, which if it was true, would make retaliatory sexism justified in a vigilante kind of way. It still wouldn’t be the mark of a civil society to engage in it, but it’s understandable. Patriarchy in the West being a myth largely debunked, they are in fact the aggressors, but their narrative is powerful enough, and enough men are co-opted into the social structure that enables this gross injustice, that i…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:05 PM
1

China should just sing on the radio to the carrier group moving into the Taiwan strait. Problem solved… until the carrier group sings back.
/r/MensRights30/07/22 02:32 AM
6

What’s an example of a myth where mermaids lure sailors to their deaths?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 03:33 PM
71

Isn’t it sirens that do that, not mermaids?
/r/MensRights29/07/22 01:41 PM
64

Well if she attests it, all he has to do is deny it in an affidavit from the grave. See, they thought this through /s
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:19 AM
22

It’s the same choice for men; only men face consequences for it, up to and including the death penalty I’d assume.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:40 PM
2

Would this qualify as “Machiavellian”? By which I mean, is this book expanding on one of the hundreds of despicable aphorisms that is actually in The Prince?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:18 PM
4

We have nothing approaching justice in our society, but that could change in a heartbeat with a new innovation or technology. We may also lose the level of luxury that affords our society weak or nonexistent penalties for offenders. And if that happens, these women will have a rainy day.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 01:34 AM
1

Marry her. She’ll settle down right away and you’ll get rich from her selling drugs. I’m sure her kids just need a single talking-to.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 11:37 PM
-9

I’m a big proponent of this sub, and a daily listener to Scott Adams’ podcast, so I have a better perspective than you. He spoke to this mischaracterization of his opinion on today’s episode. Which was probably unnecessary given how obvious it is that nobody would be arguing for that. It’s very obvious a public figure would never say this, but you missed that. The thousands who retweeted his thread got it though.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 12:28 AM
-20

You guys read that tweet and took from it that he’s advocating killing your son? Maybe have another read. People on this thread are usually very on the ball and I think we can all discern his meaning, which is pretty clear: zero credible support services for addicted male teens. I admit I could be wrong and this isn’t a reading comprehension issue, which means it’s just a false flag.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 10:04 PM
2

Not from every country.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:53 AM
1

110 irritable bowel syndrome is hard for most people to pull off.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/07/22 08:39 PM
0

Something rings really false about this, but maybe that’s just in my head. Which country are you in? Because I have encountered people from one country from which this level of extremely grounded, humble authenticity and character might be a cultural trait.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:48 PM
3

Our culture denigrates men. But not all cultures do. And there are women from those better cultures all around. And of course, they have entire countries full of them. So if you’re on the ropes of life, but otherwise healthy, I’d argue you have freedom to pursue that if that is your goal, and you have nothing to lose.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:41 PM
5

They would if their intent was purposely malign.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 05:54 AM
11

If the bad actors were honest about that, everyone would oppose it and it would destroy their victim/underdog status narrative. It is hard to think of an aspect of the ideology that would harm the bad actors more if they changed it. What is the driving motive of a group that seeks an unearned imbalance of power in their favor, which they accomplish using a premise they know is false? I’d say hatred, in the same sense as we say certain historical governments were “driven by hatred” in committing …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:42 AM
11

This would destroy me and I’m not sure anything would make me feel better. Maybe someone someday will read this and it might help a bit. If you exit, you never get to see them again. If you stay, you one day might, when they are grown up. You can also make videos and letters for them now, which will prove your feelings for them later when they are grown up. This is insurance against the mom poisoning them against you. Imagine how they’ll feel about their mom then. They were abducted, but are pre…
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:54 PM
5

I have to agree, this isn’t what many “equality”-focused women wanted.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/22 02:11 AM
20

That’s one upside in all this.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/22 02:15 PM
13

Heck hath no fury. If you see trouble coming, turn on your phone’s audio recorder at least, if that’s nice and legal where you live.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 12:53 PM
121

Gotta protect that false narrative.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 02:55 PM
1

Why would they apologize for their own cherished views? Why can’t they stand a little pushback against what they believe in? Military recruitment is a funny thing. When you love your country, and loving your country is not undermined by infested institutions, it’s easy to get recruits. When your country is corrupt, and a more “good” country comes invading, everyone surrenders in the dictatorship, because why die for a future with Uday and Qusay in charge? People believing in their own country’s …
/r/MensRights05/05/22 01:48 PM
9

One thing you can’t deny is 4WF are some of the happiest and most fulfilled people on the planet, unlike mothers in families. And it’s ideas like this that give them their winning personalities.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/05/22 01:09 AM
1

We lost Phil Hartman to this.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:13 AM
1

California responds by mandating abortions for the first four pregnancies.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 05:36 AM
15

To expand on this specific good warning: Be covertly suspicious of anyone trying to gain your confidence. Project Veritas gains the confidence of supremely corrupt or unethical people all the time, but the strategy could work just as well with a bad actor, acting as a confederate, gathering out-of-context quotes and inflammatory comments to build a case for the sub to get banned or commenters to get doxxed. This is why I would especially never participate in “research” anyone is doing using a po…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 05:50 PM
18

This sounds like classic invading men’s spaces, the only group-spaces that are apparently not sacrosanct. Although neither are women’s anymore, as some individuals have found a very profitable niche technicality.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 05:55 AM
3

What would be “advanced reasoning”?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:36 AM
3

That’s gaslighting. If there’s anyone who doesn’t know what that is, check it out. You get +1 WIS permanently when you learn about that.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 10:46 PM
2

That’s not how society works, thankfully. And obviously he’s 100% the victim in all this.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 12:54 AM
43

I got this today too but the post they said was hatey isn’t accessible. I am pretty sure that post was satire. I don’t hate anyone. I do long for justice to one day visit a handful of politicians, however.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:30 PM
12

I’ve noticed that.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 09:34 PM
113

How are boys doing on every socioeconomic indicator compared to girls?
/r/MensRights16/04/22 10:42 AM
17

Um, mainstream media has made it pretty clear that Ukraine is 100% the good guy in the right, and Russia is 100% bad guy in the wrong. What, are we supposed to question the news?
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:20 PM
4

Never tell an ideologically-captured zealot that they have harmed you to any extent. This is the payoff they are going for. Zealots like this live to hurt others with no risk of retaliation. Lots of people long to hurt others with no chance of retaliation. I think it’s the central motivation of ideological zealots.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 03:49 PM
20

Are the women handing out white feathers to men who aren’t serving for reasons unknown to the women that aren’t serving?
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:08 PM
2

People like that wife should just disappear. Just go somewhere no one will ever find them. It’s better for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 01:30 PM
1

If our perception was that nearly everybody thought abortion was bad, none of us individually would be pro-abortion. It’s been normalized as a good thing, but only under threat. It’s easier to just get along and buy the incomplete, half-developed arguments for it. Opposing the tribe has a cost, and elements of the tribe have made being anti-abortion a taboo. Specifically, elements of our tribe have made it clear that opposition to their point of view on this issue will result in your own destruc…
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:52 PM
23

Until Covid, I always gave big pharma the benefit of the doubt. Profit orientation by itself isn’t evil. But it can drive evil. Not to mention whatever social engineering/crate training motives they were serving.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:20 PM
32

I irrationally find it stomach-turning, but the benefits to men socially are there for sure. I will say this, ima go ahead and let 20 years of user data roll in before I take the plunge.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 03:06 PM
2

No argument there, unfortunately. I should have said, that’s why it’s in the man’s best interest to take sole responsibility for adhering to the policy.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:33 PM
13

This is an important policy for everyone involved.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:13 PM
1

“Organize a visit to a slum near your school.”
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:27 PM
4

Someone should make one of these with the obstacles of suicide rate, workplace fatalities, war fatalities, college completion rates, etc.
/r/MensRights18/03/22 03:22 AM
5

There’s a saying about wrestling with pigs.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/22 01:48 PM
2

Under this premise, women are the ONLY ones affected by war. If the violent death of conscripted men is outweighed by the suffering of women who were allowed to flee to Poland, then I would argue men are not suffering LESS, but according to these elites, men are not suffering at all. They’re not considered sentient humans, under this premise. Like how a destroyed airport or vehicle doesn’t suffer. The women who would have used it, however, they do suffer from its loss, under this premise. I’d li…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:19 PM
1

I mean the English signs at least do not seem authentic.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:44 AM
1

Those fake signs on the second image- what is that? Why the fake signs?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:26 AM
1

You know what would be nice, is a reckoning.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 08:09 PM
5

You are correct. Was the other person engaging in debate in good faith? If so, worthwhile. If she’s blue no matter who about it, well…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:52 AM
19

Right on facts, but you lost just by the act of engaging in the debate. :(
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:18 AM
2

Imagine banning subs that talk about human behaviour and motivation, and banning discussion of the desire of men to not enslave themselves. I bet there has never been a call to action on either of those subs to do ANYTHING except self improvement and self protection. Are they on discord now, or where could I find those?
/r/MensRights06/03/22 03:29 PM
81

Let’s add to this an overwhelming denial of men’s issues, plus institutionalized victimization and oppression and removal of merit-based opportunities for men… I’ll say it again: while denying it’s happening. I really appreciate women who acknowledge it. I really appreciate men who describe reality in ways that are not always obvious.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 06:05 PM
22

Participating in research like this is like signing up for a hit piece on yourself, where there is a nonzero chance that a malicious person involved with the research will happily breach ethics and dox you as punishment for your experiences and opinions. Such as by notifying your employer or school, and embellishing your responses as necessary. Why would anyone help someone like this? This is a trap like that mod who went on tv and destroyed the whole movement the mod was fighting for.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 05:18 AM
1

I don’t know. What does the work and accomplishment of others have to do with me? Would it not be better to concentrate on our own works and progress?
/r/MensRights01/03/22 08:26 PM
2

Doubling labor would theoretically halve the cost of goods. And some goods do constantly deflate in price. But the cost can only be reduced by a greater supply of cheaper labor if labor was the only cost that went into goods. Materials and regulatory expenses and overhead count as well. As well, increases in regulation solve a lot of hazards and problems (like lead paint, asbestos, building codes etc.) but those regulations take legions of bureaucrats to maintain, and that cost is paid in variou…
/r/MensRights26/02/22 11:03 PM
2

That may be true. I suspect it is true.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 04:08 PM
-1

There wasn’t even internet in the early 90s. From 1994 to now is more distance than: 1913 to 1940 1945 to 1971 1969 to 1985
/r/MensRights26/02/22 03:44 PM
1

What’s with the ancient data for this? We have had extensive, material, mostly negative changes to our society in the meantime, which probably would produce different results today. But at least they would be relevant.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 03:10 PM
14

As well, doubling the labour supply necessarily halves wages. So in the 50s, dad could support a family of four, but now it takes both, and with less time spent raising the kids by mom. Not saying it’s all bad. People need to be free to work. There’s a utopian element to the old days that it would be nice to bring back.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 02:36 PM
18

I didn’t watch the video, but that’s quite a penalty.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/22 02:45 PM
16

Remember you’re hardwired with instincts to notify you of threats, including social threats that would “exile you from the tribe.” Not all people will victimize you or harvest you for their benefit. If you get a bad vibe from someone, don’t let on, but extricate yourself. If you can’t get a read on someone, that’s a potential threat. If you get a good vibe, interrogate it until you feel sure. Even that’s not foolproof, but it’s a useful approach for someone looking to participate in normal life,…
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:21 AM
18

This is called “acting in good faith.” Nothing wrong with YOU for being normal and trusting just because someone else is whatever her problem is.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 02:50 AM
1

You could definitely be right. Still a career-threatening opinion though?
/r/MensRights06/02/22 02:26 AM
-5

Something is fishy about this post. “Indian” is not a commonly-used term by anyone in Canada except Indigenous people and the elderly. It’s considered a bigoted term now, by “society.” I have worked in the post-secondary sector in Canada, and most/all Canadian universities are undertaking a process of “Indigenization.” In a nutshell, it means universities and colleges are putting great emphasis on building/improving relations with tribes/bands, reconciliation, and enabling Indigenous participati…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 10:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter