TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Blank_ngnl Archive

View 1 post and 115 comments by Blank_ngnl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
132

GeneralBlank_ngnl/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:33 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Hey could u give me the source links?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 02:17 AM
-2

If you stop being a fucking idiot maybe
/r/MensRights31/12/23 01:08 PM
0

Luisa penger, annike borgmann 2 people i know Look there certainly are people that have this god awefull takes, but you Suggesting that EVERY feminist is wanting that bs is just dumb and simply untrue. There are different kinds of feminists. You descibe more femnazis then feminists
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:15 PM
-2

Ohhh nooo im telling people hate speech is bad :ccccc
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:10 PM
0

Ah yes "all feminists do x" A sentence which shows how ignorant you are and how little you actually talked with the other group...
/r/MensRights31/12/23 12:04 PM
0

So your saying its okay to beat you to death because you talked to them? Nah your a psycho... I have no idea how many mental hoops you push throught to make victim-blaming acceptable. Please seek help
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:24 PM
-2

Huh interesting but i assume thats more of a personality problem that lead them to also have a higher body count? Like i said i just dont think the comment that the body count in itself is bad. That the personality traits and other stuff that leads to such a high body count could be unstable, that i dont doubt
/r/MensRights30/12/23 10:22 PM
1

For example more women are raped ans sexually assaulted but more men are victims of physical abuse Ofc this isnt a contest but if you weight most of womens and mens issues i think they lay round about equally
/r/MensRights30/12/23 09:40 PM
0

You are comparing a women with a skirt with a ferrari with open doors. If you yourself cant see how dehumanising and utterly despicable that comparison is i can not and will not help you.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:13 PM
1

Its not worse in germany. Women and men both suffer equally.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:11 PM
0

Whaaat i support some points feminist make? Could it be that not everything the other side say is bs :OOO And giving some fault to the victims of abuse is fucking wild
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:48 PM
1

I never said they should stop posting their opiniond i advocate that they stop blind hate speech. But you dont seem to know the difference do you ;)
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:31 PM
0

'Worldwide 38% of the suspected perpetrators of human trafficking are female" I wonder what sex the other 62% have mhhhhhhhh Tbh you have a fucked up rape definition in the usa if you say you can only be raped if your penetrated However assuming the overall stats of rape are 50/50 is something i would immediatly want to decline since middle east exists Also i have no idea why you wrote this? The other person also wrote the same stuff but better and you literally saw that???
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:29 PM
0

Nah after all your entertaining ^ ^ Not in a im laughing with you way tho
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:24 PM
0

Okay what the fuck does the usa have for a fucking terrible definition of rape 💀💀💀💀 However this is now an impasse since the article ive shown defines rape as "unlawful sexual activity (sexual assault) involving sexual intercourse performed without consent or forcibly or under threat of injury against a person's will." So we have statistics with almost the same definition i assume with vastly different outcomes
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:23 PM
1

Damn calling me a troll is the worst counter argument ive ever heard War
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:12 PM
0

And im arguing that a confound variable could be at play A high body count could be a risk factor, but the carrier variable of being born a men is also a risk factor for a lot of things. Meaning: you cant deduce either is inherently "bad"
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:08 PM
-1

No one needs your permission for anything dear ^ ^ If so good go toe to toe for me on everything and i mean everything. Actually lets call. Send me a pm i give you my dc and we can have a civil discussion gramps. Or do you still use fax? Also i dislike the feminist movementy to much hate, to radical If you mean being a person that strives for equality: sure im gonna be that person but i will never change being that person. By the way i love the notion of: what you dont support some of my beliefs…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:06 PM
1

Correlation does not equate causation There could also be a confound variable. All possibilities the statistics you provided didnt really delve into
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:04 PM
0

Needed to unblock you to respond to someone and there is apparently a 24h period where you cant block someone who u recently unblocked
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:02 PM
1

"About 21.3% of women surveyed reported completed or attempted rape at some point in their lives, with 1.2% reporting completed or attempted rape in the 12 months preceding the survey. About 2.6% of men reported experiencing completed or attempted rape at some point in their lives." https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/rape-statistics-by-state No they dont
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:01 PM
-2

Oh im from germany i have no idea how it is in the brazil, canada, etc. Yeah lowering the standards is absolutely bs. Its also bs if your told that masculinity in itself is bad. Toxic masculinity is but so is toxic femininity... so yeah if its really that bad over the other side of the pond then fuck im sorry
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:50 PM
0

Depends on your country. Here in germany its equally shitty for both tbh. Idk where you are from tho Usa: i would say men have it worse Western europe: i would say its roughly the same East asia: women 100%
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:41 PM
0

Yeah especially rape statistics and sexual harrassment there men suffer sooooo much more.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:40 PM
-1

I like most of your comment however we never advocate men NEED to be x or women NEED to be y. Every sane person says you CAN be more feminine/masculine if you want to. Which in my opinion is the most logical thing to do since there exists feminine men and masculine women And if the 5'3 100lbs women actually manages to absolve the test you need to join the force why stop her. If she has the necessary strenght then its only fair shes treated like everyone else.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:40 PM
-2

Keep blabbling
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:35 PM
-2

You know that my post isnt a scientific article but my opinion tho. Its a plead not a paper? I never once claimed in it its factually correct. I even said that in some comments Its my opinion and nothing else ^ I think its redicilous that you cant see the difference between an article and an opinion tho. Hilarious
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:35 PM
2

Im not advocating for any kind of censorship. This post is a plead to use your brains. We see what happens if you dont if you look at the extreme feminists. I dont want to end like that
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:32 PM
1

Yeah sorry i meant more like Incorrect generalisations because of hate. Phrases like: "Women of reddit bully men" "men bully women in the workplace" Are just some nonsense thrown into this sub to make the other side look bad. "All men" and "all women"... im sick of these overgeneralisations.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:29 PM
2

You think the intimacy you and your partner share is on the same level as a number...? When i have sex with someone i care about them and them only and not the dudes she fucked before me.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:27 PM
-2

Us... The normal society
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:19 PM
2

Exactly Why capitalism is a bad system is another can of worms tho.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:19 PM
-1

The families are lead by men tho.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:18 PM
-1

I strive for equality between the sexes. I think the feminist movement has turned to much to hate and illogical reasoning and lost the goal of gender equality Therefore i am not and most likely never will be a feminist Also higher body count does not automatically lead to infidelity. You argue causation but you only show correlation. While it is a risk factor it doesnt automatically make sth "bad"
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:17 PM
-2

Are you sure what humans are interested in is defined by biology and not the social environment?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:12 PM
2

Thinking a ferrari with an open door is the same as a women with short dress is mental gymnastics on a whole other level...
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:10 PM
2

Im not advocating to censor more. I want the community to be more fact based and not overly generalizing Phrases like "women of reddit think x, do y and make z" are the same as "men are x, y and z"
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:09 PM
-2

If you think body count matters for you then thats completely fine. I also think sex matters. I dont think body count matters tho What is a typical modern definition of rape?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:29 PM
-3

I never implied it would be because "one side of the debate" I do see this subreddit as a group tho. Isnt it? I dont mean the entire mens right movement gets more radical im talking about this subreddit specifically
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:27 PM
-2

Like i said i dont fight anyone who does not believe me over those posts since i didnt save any posts (blank_ngnl, 2024) For a more indept view to the similarities and differences of the icd-11 and dsm-5 i would like to point out "Icd-11 and DSM-5 - Similarity and differences". gaebel W, european psychiatry. 2015 Regarding your comment about reporting i was talking about actively going through the sub and reading every post. Reporting the posts on my timeline that are imo not really fitting for …
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:23 PM
-1

And yes sorry i should have specified that i mean most rich people who actively influence politics are male
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:12 PM
-4

Who do you think makes the important decisions in that family? The daughters, the sons, the wives, or the person who owns the entire wealth
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:11 PM
-1

I did never say that the same problem doesnt exist in the feminist group. Imo they radicalized much much earlier. I just dont want the mens right movement to become a hate group like them
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:09 PM
-9

Yeah because the size of a group definetly predicts their radicalisation Thats why cults where people kill themself to flee their earthly body also almost always have less then 200 people in it.... oh wait
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:07 PM
-4

Healthwise definetly you since there are health issues that are involved. The kind of bad i mean when im talking about body count isnt subjectively tho but factually. Claims like "a high body count is bad" miss the important "in my opinion". The opinion is being presented like a fact. A fact that simply isnt true since it isnt objectively bad or good to have a high body count (mentally and physically not morally) If you think a high body count is bad in your opinion go ahead But dont think its s…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 02:01 PM
0

The comment "trust the rest of the world more than the usa" was after i tried to explain the other person that the icd-11 is simply more reliable since in essense its a more refined version of the dsm-5. The comment was after the user tried to defamate me multiple times. It wasnt how i should have acted, i agree, but its not how i usually act i just want to clear that out Most of the steps you mentioned take time that i dont have: being a mod, going to the sub to report etc etc. And i dont think…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:57 PM
-4

I never said women wouldnt care about it? I think everyone can and should have their personal preferences. I just dont suppoet the notion that a high body count is factually a bad thing. I think its personal preferance like height, interests, looks etc.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:40 PM
-3

Thank you. That means a lot to me
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:37 PM
-2

There is a massive difference between consent and non consent. I am also not an expert on that topic so i think how valuable sex is is dependend on the person Some women/men hold it in high regards others see it as something more casual, something to have fun. Over the last 50 years the notion that sex means you have to build a family with the person your fucking has declined massively. We are more open about the topic of sex now (which can be seen as good or bas) For some sex is as casual as wa…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:37 PM
-8

Alright gatekeeper
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:12 PM
-45

There are multiple definitions of patriachy I use the third one that pops up when you google the definition of patriachy "Run by men"... nothing else I believe that we are living in a world which is run by the rich which are to 90% male at the expense of women men and every other person, which instigate gender wars so we fight each other instead of fighting them I do see your point and i must say i agree with it, but i think its also not fair to ignore that most rich people are male due to patri…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:10 PM
0

Damn nice argument
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:05 PM
-2

There is a difference between being realistic and being sexist. Im realistic as is this sub but im worried its becoming the latter And do you really think pure hate will make the other side go "ohhh right i see your point. No we are absolutely part of the problem and not just men" Or will they go "look how fucking sexist those pigs are" Like i said. I share most of the opinions on this sub, but not those that are not based on evidence and science
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:04 PM
-8

But thats my entire point? I completely agree with you. In fact i have the same opinion. What i critizise is the notion that a high body count it inherently bad and you cant have any other opinion but thinking its bad
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:02 PM
3

There is a difference between being realistic and pure hate The sub is mostly the former but im concerned its becoming the latter The most prominent thing i see is the overgeneralisation of women. Similar to "all men do x" here its "all women do x"
/r/MensRights30/12/23 01:00 PM
-3

Hey how about both sides suffer and have problems. Its not only men Its not only women Its both
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:50 AM
-3

Im sorry but do women not have a larger investment into their child due to uk pregnancy and being the one with the milk. The first paragraph makes it seem like male body count would be more important so the male partner doesnt just run of. And the paragraph about the friends could also be true about men couldnt it?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:32 AM
-2

I think you severely underestimate the time of a 20 year old. They are not 2... please. Besides most climate activists are teens while most people that say its a hoax are old people. So as you can see its completely stupid to say Hurr durr schmarter cause age
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:16 AM
-8

Like i said if the girl i date liked to have casual hookups before commiting to a relationship with me i dont mind it. If you want to call out a women with a high body count im not stopping you at all. Do what you or other men want. I wont be joining you tho since i dont like to talk about people behind their back if i not seriously hate that person
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:04 AM
-2

Bruuuh
/r/MensRights30/12/23 08:01 AM
-7

Ah yes because age = knowledge
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:51 AM
4

Then what exactly is this sub?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:47 AM
-5

Thats neat research actually. Did they find the reason for it? However it still doesnt mean body count always matters. For me personally it doesnt and never really has tbh. Especially in this modern age There are simply some individuals who dont give a shit about it. P<0.05 etc etc
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:46 AM
-3

I apologize i think i worded my opinion wrong I care about my education in general... i care about it a lot actually However i do not care about the education of someone im having a discussion with. I see my own education also as a non factor in a discussion as something not important. I cant just swing it around saying "yooo loook i study this and that im a prof in this and that" and win in a discussion that way. Thats why i said i dont care about it.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:42 AM
-3

First of all thanks for providing evidence unlike almost any other person ive talked to here. I will look at it tmr tho since im tired. Hope you can wait
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:36 AM
4

The problem is that i dont really find another sub that has the same core values as this sub. I advocate for mens rights but i feel like we talk to little with the other side and to much in our ingroup.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:33 AM
-6

Ah yes because i need to make bad life choices to have a high body count Some people just enjoy casual hookups Men are more aggressive and do rape more often. There is nothing controversial about it. Ah sorry i meant to say "because of biology" But now i realize that comparison is terrible. My bad
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:30 AM
3

I wholeheartedly agree with most of what you said. I didnt know that preventative bans exist tbh but those sound vile. I also dont want that cancel culture just cancels someone due to them bringing up hard scientific evidence, concerns etc. Tbh i think we are majorly fucked. Each site riles up the other and we have harder fronts. A few weeks ago i was talking with a friend about that i as a man am afraid to walk home alone. When he said to me i would not be needing to be afraid i brought up that…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:28 AM
1

I just described myself since the commentator said i would be a women with a high body count? I didnt rry to use it as a mean to make myself look like an authoritarian figure.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:20 AM
-5

Well could you give me that evidence then? If im wrong i will gladly change my opinion but first i need proof uk
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:19 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/Menslib2/s/OwcqKZQQ5Z Hows that any different from the core idea of this sub
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:09 AM
1

Imagine basing people of their education and nog based on the evidence facts and arguments. How pathetic
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:08 AM
-1

I feel that. Especially some of these comments just try to attack you on a personal level without any fact based arguments. But hey those prove my point so yey i guess?
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:07 AM
0

Thats basically what i said tho
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:04 AM
-1

Like i said i trust the entire world more than america But you do you
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:03 AM
-6

Im sorry but to me body count doesnt matter. Neither for men nor for women as long as those doesnt have a negative effect on their personality. Ive met some super sweet women in my first semester which have a pretty high body count but are the some of the nicest people ive ever met. Both of them are now in happy relationships
/r/MensRights30/12/23 07:01 AM
0

Like i said. Use the icd-11 which is the most reliable source And i paraphrase you: 'nah the american one is enough for me"
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:58 AM
-4

Does it always matter or does it always matter to you? There is a big difference
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:57 AM
-18

I think everyone can and should be able to read scientific articles, papers and books outside of their designated area. Would i be less trustworthy if im unemployed with no basic education but still bring up factually correct arguments? No because you always have to back up your claims. So overall i would say a 70. But i would always give a 70. Im sure of most of my opinions right now but i want to always strive to search for facts that disprove my opinions. And if you think you only learn somet…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:56 AM
-3

I dont care about my education or any education personally. I think the only people who do that dont have the abilities to back their claims up with something substential most of the time. Tbh i did that to the one person i blocked bc i was to lazy to search for the ICD-11 part that was relevant to the conversation so in that case i myself made a mistake However i dont need to converse with people who insult me or make stupid assumptions about me. I warned them 2 times that i would not continue …
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:45 AM
-10

Like i said: i think everyone should be able to determine for themself, if body count matters for them For me personally: it doesnt matter as long as the person is nice and (this might be a bit hard to describe for me in english im sorry?) "supports" me in the bedroom, because im pretty inexperienced and have some major insecurities about my body and my abilities in the bedroom, due to my first ex gf.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:37 AM
1

Im sorry i am german so my english is not the best What i wanted to say is that i did not post posts but commented here and there but very sporadically and did just mostly read posts
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:23 AM
-4

My name is Tom im a 20 year old psychology Student. Thats the third time you try to defamate me. Like i said i will block you after the third time since your incapable of having a fact based conversation.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:22 AM
-33

Like i said i fully support the second set of beliefs (not the first one tho since i think thats a personal choice. You yourself can decide if body counts matter and noone else should be able to do that for you) However these beliefs are core of this subreddit and were always present. Even 2 years ago. What im worried about are the most extreme takes body count always matters women are largely guilty if they get sa'd all women are bad generalisation of "men" and "women" in areas where generalisa…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:20 AM
-2

Again: no arguments no examples just pure diffamation. Thats strike 2. If you do it again i will block you since that would imply you dont have basic human courtesy to hold a discussion. So dont blame me if i block ya
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:12 AM
-16

I did not do that. At least that post is not the sole reason its part of a growing problem which i noticed around 3 weeks ago. Those comments however (yours included but not specifically) made me conviced enough to post this tho. So no i did not post this solely because of you. You are part of the problem but you are not the problem However If you want to get called out specifically you are inable to look for anything that doesnt support your world view. Kinda like people who dont believe in cli…
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:10 AM
0

You just checked my post history You can just go through all of my comments. Reality doesnt care what you believe
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:03 AM
1

Yes. This isnt my first comment tho
/r/MensRights30/12/23 06:00 AM
2

See my edit: Also No the icd also classifies those
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:59 AM
0

Many people said that not only you
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:56 AM
0

Its not DSM is only used in america but has many overlaps with the ICD. Which DSM was it tho The ICD-11 is used as the golden standard Source: i study psychology Edit: like i said while the dsm has many overlaps it would be better to check the ICD-11 if those overlaps also accur in the part which is important to our discussion since the ICD-11 is more respectable
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:54 AM
0

Im sharing my opinion like every member in this community is free to do. And like i said im not active on this sub just write here and there for 1 day per month or so. I do not view myself as a saviour and if you think this post is full of inaccuraccies maybe point them out instead of trying to talk me down
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:53 AM
1

How so? I wasnt talking about you there buckaroo
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:50 AM
2

My honest opinion ^ ^
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:49 AM
0

Is that from the ICD-10 or ICD-11? Please check at the ICD-11 how they describe it if it isnt from there
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:48 AM
-4

And men rape more so men are more agressive? Doesnt sound like a really good argument If you search hard enough you can find correlations everywhere
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:34 AM
-3

Correlation doesnt mean causation
/r/MensRights30/12/23 05:15 AM
1

Where exactly did i state that all men are responsible? I feel like you lay words into my mouth. I also never stated that i think men are priviledged? I dont know who you are arguing against but its certainly not me
/r/MensRights21/12/23 05:05 AM
0

Well out of the top 50 richest people in the us 5 are women... i think we both know that thats not a massive amount
/r/MensRights21/12/23 04:33 AM
-4

Well i would agree with your take buuuut since the oligarchy is almost exclusive to men its still some sort of patriachy We could agree on a patriachal oligarchy and call it a day
/r/MensRights21/12/23 03:06 AM
-4

Well i dont use the definition you gave me but the following definition from google: a society or community organized on patriarchal lines. Patriachal: relating to or denoting a system of society or government controlled by men. And if you look at that definition you can make a pretty sound case that especially the usa is a patriachy. I never stated i would argue that the default or normal for men is being a billionair or sw who holds power, quite the contrary. But its not really a secret that t…
/r/MensRights21/12/23 02:59 AM
-5

I would say we live in the patriachy.... where 0.00005% of men have all the power (or like most powerfull and rich people)
/r/MensRights21/12/23 01:15 AM
2

Germany doesnt and im really glad they dont
/r/MensRights03/12/23 10:39 AM
1

True However if you want to stay true to that definition then so be it: 1: there isnt the word "all" included in the definition meaning as long as 2 men or more are on top and at least two women have to bear expenses because of that its a patriachy And in the definition it is never stated that men cant also suffer due to the patriachy. Meaning my wording: "rich men who supress men and women are on top where both men and women suffer equally, but differently" is still by your definition a patriac…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 11:38 PM
1

Damn then why do they make it so risky? In germany even one without any euro to their name can become president Why do you think its not like that in the us? And do you really think the senate isnt financially corruptable And the "illusion of choice" referred to an illusion of which choices you make. Not the one of politics but the one of who is getting richer. But it was pretty clear that an below average individual like you focussing on trying to prove a point by trying to act interlectually s…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 10:39 PM
1

How do you think the presidental candidats fund their election. Why was every president since 1949 at least a millionair? Also my point is that there is an illusion of choice, not that there isnt any? Did you even read my comment or just disregarded it before you had to actually think about it? Also how is my opinion in any way cynistic? On contrary isnt yours the cynicistic one? Comparing me to a man-hater and trying to discredit my argument as "cynicism" without even trying to make valid count…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 09:29 PM
0

You know you could have taken so many examples... and then u choose the votes in the us.. where both electors just are either multi- millionairs or get bought by them. Your choice is between right and extreme right There is no "democracy" in the Us. You choose which billionair you want to become more richer than the other and thats it. Take epstein for example who "accidentally" died. The rich powerfull families and billionairs hold the power and under the 100 richest people only 5 are women....…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 08:34 PM
3

It is by definition Ruled by men (rich) to the cost of women (and men)
/r/MensRights30/11/23 03:31 PM
3

Thats exactly my point👍
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:31 AM
-7

Im trying to tell you that the average joe does not have a significant part in running society especially in the usa. Average joe = EVERYONE that is not rich. Men and women Both sides of the political spectrum are funded by rich old MEN. Not rich old WOMEN
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:28 AM
-6

There are multiple definitions... the one i presented above is one of them
/r/MensRights30/11/23 11:22 AM
-9

That is only halfway right Google defines patriachy also as: Patriachy: a society or community organized on patriarchal lines. Definition of patriachal: relating to or denoting a system of society or government controlled by men. So yes we live in a patriachy. Designed by rich men for rich men at the expense for everyone. Especially if you live in the Usa. Example: it doesnt matter who you vote since the politicians are either a: rich themself or b: bought by rich guys Edit: if you decide to dow…
/r/MensRights30/11/23 10:03 AM
22

Because the men in power dont care about the men not in power
/r/MensRights30/11/23 01:34 AM
10

Copied from another comment: Men suffer in canada because Less educational $ Less healthcare $ Expected to work in harshest industries Get killed 12 times more at workplace Receive harsher sentences in the courts Expected to be financial providers Expected to pretend women want to be equal Work longer Retire later Die first Just a start.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:24 AM
0

Hey i think that comment is a bit... overly generalizing
/r/MensRights04/03/23 11:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter