TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlazerFS231 Archive

View 1 posts and 18 comments by BlazerFS231 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Debates can have a significant impact on elections, though. Remember the first Obama-Romney debate? That had Democrats worried until Obama stepped up his game in the next debate.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:34 AM
46

A child? I’d have a hard time spending that on the whole family.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 09:32 PM
2

You’ve been muted for now, but any future posts will likely get you banned. Mods over there will ban anyone who has a post history on this sub.
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:03 PM
-7

Meh. Men are more likely to be involved in auto accidents. It’s not blind discrimination. It’s a business model. Is it also wrong to charge people under 25 more for car insurance?
/r/MensRights16/06/18 07:35 AM
5

Somehow the media has conflated transactional sex with rape.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 08:55 PM
1

That’s the rule that “got” me. It’s what they use when you make a point they don’t agree with.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 10:48 PM
3

In my book, that means not sentencing them to 20 years for non-violent crimes.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:25 AM
9

Reminds me of Ted Cruz’ argument against adding women to Selective Service. He made a comment about sending our daughters off to die. Apparently it’s cool to send our sons, though.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 07:23 AM
-2

It’s a valid word, but only for a very specific situation. Nowadays, it gets used whenever a man explains something to a woman regardless of the intentions or knowledge of either party.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:42 PM
6

This is the point that’s all too often missed in a number of inclusion policies. Being a good person, self disciplined, and strong isn’t enough. No one (including me) has a right to military service. If you don’t make the service more lethal and more effective, you don’t belong.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:35 AM
2

Because the 1st Amendment guarantees the right to free assembly.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 10:19 AM
5

Then I’d much rather fight to allow men’s only private organizations. If they don’t receive public funding, who cares either way?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:46 AM
24

Private organization, right? Let them do what they want.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:34 AM
2

If men forced their wives to vote for Trump, why did my Democrat wife vote for Trump when I was an open Johnson supporter?
/r/MensRights22/03/18 12:41 AM
14

It’s better than using “literally” figuratively, in mein opinion.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:55 PM
10

Very true! Military teaches this in combat casualty care. Part of the full-body pat down involves checking the groin; if the casualty has an erection, he probably has a severe neck/back injury.
/r/MensRights10/03/18 10:53 PM
2

No problem! Eisenhower is the only WW2 general to become president. If you can find the letter, please post it; I’m sure a lot of us would love to read it.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:06 PM
6

That’d be Eisenhower.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 01:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter