TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BleuBird18 Archive

View 1 posts and 228 comments by BleuBird18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Yeah... There are never any violent and repeated issues as a result of sporting events around the world. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/19 03:14 PM
4

Yeah... Twerps literally say there's "muh red pillz and everything else is BLUEPILL." "Bluepill" (to twerps) means 'unenlightened fools' but it literally just describes anyone that doesn't suck off the angry micopenis that is collectively known as 'rp'. There is no collective 'bp' philosophy or outlook... It just describes anyone that finds twerps to be idiotic and disgusting (because of their hateful, sexist, and homophobic 'theories').
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/19 12:48 PM
2

Did you mistakenly think your comment was witty?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 07:36 PM
2

You're seriously equating the care of children (often left by one parent, but sometimes both) to recreational fucking?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 07:34 PM
2

Uh huh.... How is it twerps make revolution sound so fucking stupid and juvenile?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 07:32 PM
2

This is nonsense. Businesses pay humans money, because money is how we secure things to survive in today's world. It's not 'society' expecting shit... It's people trying to get rich, get by, and make a life. 'Following laws' are things that citizens of a state/country are expected to do, because everyone just doing whatever the fuck wouldn't lead to any kind of stable existence for anyone. If you want to go run into the wild, become Amish, or whatever the fuck that lets you escape the 'unreasona…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 07:31 PM
22

No one is owed sex, relationships, happiness, a job, land or anything else just because they exist. In the US, people are protected by the ability to pursue happiness.... but there's nothing about achieving it. I'm not against programs that help train, educate, and help folks get work. You talk about sex and relationships as though access to them should be guaranteed and protected.... which is weird, especially because you only seem to care about the male side of things. Not to mention the large…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/18 12:08 PM
1

Having a child, moving to another state, quitting a job, going on vacation, buying a home, getting married... These are things that require a conversation in relationships because the outcomes affects multiple people. There are pros and cons. Why are you so adamant about it being a woman that wants to fuck around? Either person could suddenly decide they want a different kind of dynamic. Changing it affects two people that committed to each other, hence the need for a discussion. You haven't mad…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 03:01 AM
1

What are you talking about? What is the 'one night event'? I said there should always be room for discussion....some people want monogamous relationships, and it's not driven by insecurity, they just enjoy being committed to one person and have the commitment reciprocated. People that want to fuck around, should do so! They can stay single, seek poly dynamics, swing, or swing. There is zero reason for anyone to enter a monogamous relationship if they want to sleep with others. If it's something …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:36 AM
2

Lots of guys want threesomes with their wives involved as an excuse to fuck another woman. Sometimes opening up a relationship can be healthy and a positive change. But changing the dynamic from mono to poly or open has to be handled carefully. Understand the reasons why is important. If the relationship is happy, healthy, and solid, that's different from one that is full of mind games, poor communication, and both people are unhappy. It could be a red flag, it could be the start of a new chapte…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 02:28 AM
2

Cheating is bad because the person promised to do something (be faithful and monogamous) and then deliberately broke that promise... which they know will hurt the person they are with. People that like to have a romantic partner and continue fucking around with others do exist. poly, open, and swinger dynamics. The issue is that the person made a promise to be faithful because they love their partner, or at least care enough to agree to a mono relationship at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/18 01:49 AM
1

And you probably masturbate to the "always be closing" scene from Glengarry Glen Ross, but won't admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 04:58 AM
2

Uh huh Sad way to live, and an annoying one for others to deal with
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 04:33 AM
6

I lead human sacrifice rituals and organize orgies. Plenty of jobs that don't involve sales. Plenty of people IN sales that are not the stereotypical asshat SALES person.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 04:16 AM
5

I've never met anyone that liked people that work in sales either. A lot of them overestimate their abilities. People deal with them when they have to, and try to avoid them the rest of the time. Twerps think everything can be explained by their hack theories. Anything that isn't proof of rp working is written off as 'negligible'. The most obnoxious person is the one that walks around thinking everything is a potential deal or business opportunity. It gets old fast. Twerps have a similar mentali…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/18 03:48 AM
2

All that I care about is whether I am attracted to him and want to have sex with him. His sexual history (other than being healthy and disease free) doesn't matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 08:55 AM
4

Your perceptions are disconnected from reality. No one 'chooses' to be a victim... It happens for many reasons and it is not a simple topic that can be boiled down to 'well clearly they wanted it.'
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 07:40 AM
1

Of course!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 07:33 AM
2

I ended both relationships as soon as they proposed. Their changed visions made us incompatible. Stunned silence and disbelief... Both were absolutely certain that because their goals changed, I would naturally be on the same page. It was stupid of them to skip the discussions that generally precede proposals. I cut off all contact and blocked them. One tried to reconnect with me on and off over the next 4 years. I never responded and kept blocking the new numbers and emails. Both were pissed, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 07:26 AM
3

This comment highlights the fact that you have zero understanding of how abuse works, or what abuse victims go through. Many victims are in denial about the fact that they ARE abused, or that how they are treated is wrong. Manipulation on the part of the abuser in combination with creating fear, isolating the victim, gas lighting.... There are so many different tactics to breaking someone down and making them feel worthless and helpless. Twerp methodology pushes manipulation and and abusive ment…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/18 07:13 AM
2

I can't take anyone that uses idiotic twerp terms seriously. All of their made up lingo is so fucking stupid and detached from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 04:05 AM
1

I don't care if an SO enjoys dancing. If women buy him drinks, that just means he doesn't have to spend as much of his own money. The bigger issue is: would I date someone that regularly goes to clubs? Answer: no. I don't go to clubs myself, and I rarely drink (3 over the course of a year would be a lot).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 03:57 AM
1

It sounds like you really need to focus on yourself right now and building a happier, more stable life overall. Your history of abuse makes it really important that you have a supportive network you can rely on. In addition to therapy, you may want to consider a support group, or volunteering to work with at risk youth. There should be outdoor activity groups that you can join as well. Concentrate on healing and growing as an individual for now. It's cliche and tired, but when you have an active…
/r/ExRedPill14/12/18 03:22 AM
5

- how old are you? - what are your hobbies? - do you have a healthy and active social life? - do you have a support group, therapist, or professional that you talk to about your abuse? - do you have anyone that you look up to and consider to be a positive role model? - have you had any kind of romantic relationship or kissed someone?
/r/ExRedPill14/12/18 02:52 AM
4

It may be helpful to break your post into paragraphs. __________________________________________________ Hi, so let me start by saying that I’ve never considered my self to red pill or mgtow or anything else related to those ideals. Ultimately I’ve thought of my self as a feminist, at least in terms of agreeing with the basics of feminism. So I’m not quite sure where to begin so I’ll just jump in. I come from a pretty dysfunctional family where there was a lot of abuse, neglect, and just all aro…
/r/ExRedPill14/12/18 02:49 AM
5

Funny how the guys that INSIST women are less noble than men and are liars, now want women to lie and pretend to have amazing sex with guys. So now men are so benevolent and selfless that they view sex as an obligation and duty that the woman must abide by. And talking is always a waste of time that never leads to change. It's typical for that group. Same thing with abuse and rape (women exaggerate and lie, while men are the Real Victims TM). "We don't care if you enjoy it, just pretend to lose …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 07:49 PM
2

I'm 6'00", and I will consider a man that is 5'10" if he is otherwise amazing. I understand what the average is short, however all the women in my area seem to be 5'7" or taller. Most women really do just want a guy taller than she is. There are some women obsessed with a specific height, but a lot of guys are also obsessed with specific physical features, yet everyone is generally willing to deviate from preferences for the right person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 11:59 PM
1

Making things up isn't 'proof'... so again, if you have any studies or evidence to substantiate your claims, send along some links.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 12:38 AM
1

You said "Feminists want sex and commitment... from the same top 20% of men as non-feminists." Sometimes it's phrased as "women only go for the top 20% of men" and sometimes it's "only the top 20% of men get women" You stated feminists and non-feminists both go for the "top 20% of men" which is phrasing I have only seen used by twerps. So you did make the claim. You even said it again in this comment, but added 'ideally' which does not explain where the number came from, how it was ever establis…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 12:30 AM
1

... You are basing this on the number of men that are virgins? That doesn't say anything other than those guys are virgins. What ages are women in Japan losing their virginity, and what percent? People overall are having less sex from what I remember. Boomers continue to divorce at higher rates, and people are getting married later in life (after finishing college, and starting work). Marriage is also becoming more of a status and class indicator, with the poor opting for only cohabitation. All …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 12:12 AM
1

That does not make sense. Unless ylby 'right' you mean "people that have sex without raping their partner"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 12:05 AM
1

I do not know where this idea that all women ONLY date 20% of men came from. Is it a study or connected to research? If so, link?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 11:34 PM
20

I agree 'being picky' is often used as a negative term and it misses the point. People know more about what will and won't work, and they are better about NOT selling themselves short as they age. This is true for work as well. People with experience and skills aren't willing to put up with certain things, and tend to be better about advocating for what they deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 11:31 PM
1

Your example is very strange, because I have never heard anyone claim that a person in a relationship should go without sex, trust, or emotional intimacy. Sexual compatibility is very important, and your example also ignores cases where the person with a lower drive is the man. It's also rarely as simple as "one person won't have sex with the other". Grief, stress, being distant, bad timing (there was a post recently about a guy that tracked every time he initiated and if he was turned down. I d…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 09:38 PM
2

Twerp 'logic' (I use that word loosely and with great reluctance) says that ltr's only stand a chance if and when the guy is so hot and amazing to the woman that she will drop her panties quickly and fuck him without commitment. They do not believe that women will be hot for a man and wait to get to know him before fucking. Worse, they have this idea that a woman that waits to sleep with a man, if she has had any instances of sexual flings in her past, then she is a manipulative whore that isn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 06:10 AM
6

I've never understood how this song is 'controversial', there are more popular songs today that are a lot worse in terms of 'men treating women like slabs of meat.'
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 05:48 AM
1

I don't know any feminists that are against men's issues. The biggest problem is that the men in certain groups ONLY talk about male issues while ALSO dismissing any and all female issues. It's understandably frustrating to see men talk about false rape accusations as though they happen at higher rates than rapes, while ALSO attacking and trying to minimize, brush off, and dismiss women that talk about their trauma. There's this delusion that rape victims, and abused women float through a cushy …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 05:43 AM
3

Say 'no' to the wrong guy and end up getting raped anyway. I'm not dismissing that concern, everyone has concerns and dangers to deal with. I do my best to reduce encountering people that will physically harm me by avoiding certain places and events. Casual sex shouldn't be so rife with peril for anyone. I had a friend that was woken up from a dead sleep and stabbed by a woman his roommate brought home. She was off her meds. I've had female friends that have had to laugh off and try to quietly l…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 05:23 AM
3

- the issue is that woman's attractiveness is frequently portrayed with her as subservient, to be owned, and enjoyed. I also specifically stated that unattractive women are judged for their lack of good looks, while an average or ugly man can just be a politician and have his words judged alone *without* his physical appearance being taken into account. - hot people being assigned positive traits (kind, trustworthy, good etc) benefits both men and women. Taller men are also deemed as natural lea…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 01:13 AM
2

I think they are trying to say that 'twerp' is an insulting term, and that I insulted them specifically. That's the only thing I could come up with....but it seems like a streeeeetchhhhh
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 11:58 PM
6

only team blue is beelining for ultra victimhood here, now, in 2018, still So MRA, MGTOW, and twerps ARE NOT endlessly talking about how THEY are the 'real victims'? Talking about actual problems and giving a shit does not make someone a competitor in the made up realm of 'victim olympics' that twerps like to jerk off about constantly. The primary enforcers of so-called "toxic masculinity" are women. Most of the men I know have serious issues with being limited and told that only certain types o…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 11:55 PM
2

I’m not a twerp. Reported. lol wut? The only people I have ever seen worried about false claims are literally twerps from reddit and I didn't call you anything. Furthermore on the long list of 'normalized' terms for this sub (slut, whore etc) I highly doubt 'twerp' counts as some highly offensive insult... It’s a claim I’m making based on their pattern of complaining about male sexual behavior (not just rape and sexual assault). It's a claim you are making that I do not agree with or accept as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 11:31 PM
11

> they do disapprove of how much sex men get No they don't. Please share some examples of how feminists show a disapproval about the fact that men have sex. > how they get it People have an issue when someone 'gets' sex via coercion, rape, force, violence, drugging drinks, pushing drinks, refusing to listen when the other person expresses disinterest.... > those complaints often amount to limiting how much sex men get and what strategies they can use to get it. If you can only get sex by force, …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 10:19 PM
9

Men receive messages as well, although it's not as intense and relentless as what women get from a young age in many ways, but it is very restrictive when it comes to certain emotional expressions like vulnerability and affection for male friends. Which, hey! Feminists dislike toxic masculinity. You know that women are more harshly judged on appearance because a woman's appearance will be remarked on out of the blue, even when it has nothing to do with anything. Politicians. Lots of ugly and med…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 09:40 PM
11

What article are you referring to, do you have a link? There's also an insane number of articles hitting women over the head with all kinds of sexual messages (be hot, fuckable, and feminine) and those messages are pushed by men and women. Most things are sold around the idea of sex (appealing to men, making women strive to be more attractive). Again, no one is trying to stop people from fucking so much as they are concerned about what happens when things go wrong, like rape and sexual harassmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 09:16 PM
1

Question: was 'message' defined at all? And was there any kind of distinction between messages sent out of actual interest vs trolling (dick pic, randomly ranting about the profile)? I ask because there's a vast difference between "sup" and "hi" as an investment of time and energy, vs an actual message meant to spark a conversation, vs something intended to shock or start an argument. I'll read the parent comments in case these items were already covered.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:57 PM
20

It sounds like you are possibly trying to warp "concerns about rape and sexual harassment" into a puritanical campaign to make sure men never have sex....
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:50 PM
10

I would never describe anyone as 'alpha' unless it was to troll them. The only things that come to mind when I hear people describe 'chad' or 'alphas' says more to me about the person providing the description, than it does about what those words are supposed to embody. The way twerps use it seems conveniently vague and adaptable. It just means "any behavior they deem to be succesful or masculine"... but it changes and shifts, similar to all their other terms. Anyone can be confident, but having…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 08:44 PM
1

All I know is that if a person pushes an agenda that paints all women in the most uncharitable and dismissive way possible, then that same person loses all credibility when they get pissed off because they feel that feminists are saying "all men are rapists"
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 07:27 PM
4

My guess is that OP might mention online 'preference patrolling' nut jobs that try to tell people they are wrong for only being attracted to some people (ie "if you don't date fat women, you're garbage"). It's a type of person I have never encountered online (except for screen grabs shared by others for the purpose of laughing at the insanity) or in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 06:50 PM
1

Did you pick 3 years for any particular reason? It's interesting that you mention how he fits with your family, but you don't have opinions about his (random observation, not judging at all). I realized that the most reliable way to predict whether a guy will be able to make an effort and get along with my family is if he's already used to doing those things with his own. That's my theory at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:43 AM
2

I haven't noticed any unreasonable lists on this thread, at least that was true when I last skimmed the replies. The people with insane lists are very likely high maintenance, shallow, and not great partners for anyone EXCEPT similarly obsessive people of the sex they are attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 05:33 AM
1

The conditions and parameters have changed between your first and second comment. First it was "plates have sex with only one guy and don't expect commitment" which implies that a woman with options is going to be fine with a guy that fucks around on her. It's any girl that could sleep around, but chooses to be loyal to one dick for... Reasons... Now it's a woman that is trying to hold onto a guy that is out of her league, and that she cannot hope to find a better guy. So she puts up with him fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 01:13 AM
2

If you can laugh at yourself, and are caring, then that's not the type of person I am talking about. It's the type that says they like to 'debate' and get progressively more condescending and rude and pushy. They lack tact, awareness, and intelligence. Stubborn bullies that everyone tries to ignore as much as possible. It's fine to have strong opinions, and be lively. If people are engaging the person and having fun, it's because they know how to converse and read their audience and joke. And th…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 10:56 PM
10

I probably just don't know the broader term... Ever meet someone that is proud of being a disruptive asshole? Then when people are predictably irritated by said asshole, they use idiotic lines such as "I'm just being honest/myself" as a defense? Most people will tailor their personality and how they express themselves to fit the situation. These people on the other hand, enjoy being jerks, and then blame others for 'being uptight.' It's posturing, juvenile behavior that is frankly embarrassing..…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 08:57 PM
4

Then she isn't a 'plate' (a woman deliberately denied commitment). It's a guy lying about being committed to her, then being an asshole and fucking around. Which is awful. Cheaters are cowards too spineless to walk away. Or they don't care about lying and simply lack integrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 08:50 PM
4

Woman In no particular order: Smokes or chews Shorter than 5'10 (I am 6'00") Works excessively Obsessed with status Hates their family (there are legitimate reasons for not wanting anything to do with family. However I want to be with someone that understands what it means to be close to family, and the obligations that can go along with that) Irresponsible with money Characterizes normal social courtesies and politeness as "being forced to lie or unfairly change their personality." "Small minde…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 08:41 PM
5

Plate is a delusion fantasy. People interested in casual sex and willing to have it, are not going to be 'exclusively casual' with someone that fucks around with others. How can pill 'theory' state that women are inherently manipulative and incapable of honesty or loyalty... Yet at the same time tell themselves that the 'sluts' they are sleeping with are somehow loyal to one dick? A woman that enjoys casual sex and has options, is not going to happily only fuck one guy. When it comes to casual s…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 06:31 PM
1

If for example women with an N of 10 have a 75% likelihood of divorcing sooner or later (numbers courtesy of my ass, but a lot closer to the truth than one might want) You can't fabricate a number out of thin air and then say "but this is definitely a factor" and expect to be taken seriously. Failed relationships and marriages are complicated, and although people like to say "the other person was horrible" that's rarely, if ever, the whole story. There are different reasons that lead to the even…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 07:56 PM
2

Is there any information on why all the photos are in black and white and appear to be quite old? I'm curious to hear if people overall do better or worse with black and white photos or color photos. There also seemed to be a limit of ages. I think I noticed far more older men than I did older women, and no young children. There also didn't seem to be a lot of variation with race.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 07:49 PM
1

Then it's a bullshit measurement that just changes to suit whatever the individual wants, while also allowing the collective group to shit on the overall 'evils' of sexually active women. If sexually active women 'make bad partners, wives, and mothers' yet one person says that 'damage' happens after 2 dicks while another says it is after 10, then they are not talking about 'bio truth', but preferences. Yet twerps want to say sexual activity for women will impair her ability to be faithful, carin…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 05:42 PM
0

You told random women you were just getting to know, or a gf? How did the subject come up? If someone judges you for your past, then you wouldn't want anything to do with them anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:21 PM
0

People may object to the fact that prostitution is illegal in many places. Legalized prostitution in the US would be a good thing, healthcare and security for the workers. A better environment and more rights for the workers. Illegal prostitution conjures images of drugged out, impoverished women that are regularly abused and beaten. Or massage parlors where illegal immigrants have to go along with the rules of the establishment. Pepper in trafficking and it's not hard to understand why people r…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:28 PM
1

Going on dates doesn't translate to exclusivity or a monogamous relationship. Pretending that dates translate to exclusivity without talking to the other person is stupid. Everyone invests time and energy when they go on a date, money too generally. However those investments don't entitle you to anything, whether it's commitment or sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:42 PM
3

A weird way of saying "# of sexual partners"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:00 PM
2

I don't care what side anyone is on, this isn't a team sport. I disagree with the idea that 'cheating on unknown future partners by having sex' is a thing, which your comment seemed to be in support of
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 03:51 PM
23

Why don't twerp men* Normal people understand anyone can have sex without involving emotions. Twerps and their ilk push this view because it's convenient as a way to justify other claims about women's value and sexual experiences
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 08:21 AM
2

The other person asked how it is cheating. You haven't explained. It is not possible to 'cheat' on a future partner that the person has not met yet. The only explanation I can think of applies to people that are religious and value virginity. Any sex degrades the experience with the future spouse. However, that outlook applies to both the man and the woman. A woman the preserves herself will expect her future husband to do the same. So is it 'cheating' in your mind because you are saving yoursel…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:57 AM
10

This is one of the things that sounded more self-serving and delusional than other twerp ideas. People that CARE about remaining a virgin until marriage, prioritize that trait in their partner as well. There are no hordes of virgins that will give it up for someone that has slept around a lot. It's something that speaks to other values (usually related to religion, but not always) that they want to have in common with a spouse. The idea that virgin women are willing to trade that for a cushy lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:50 AM
2

Thanks for sharing. Glad you are with someone that makes you happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:33 AM
5

Was there a study, was it a self reporting survey, or something else? Mental illness is often ignored or goes unrecognized for many reasons unfortunately. It's both 'glamorized' or romanticized in certain ways, or only portrayed as extreme cases. There are also people with mental illness that manage things through medication, therapy, or a combination of treatments and you'd never know about their condition unless they disclosed it. I don't mind general observations and studies, but I find it hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:17 AM
7

Do you regularly ask people that question, or was it just one you asked because of what the pi found out? This is so far removed from how the people I know behave. Both having sex for financial gain, and even thinking to hire someone to investigate another person.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 07:08 AM
5

What does that even mean? "something she is likely to hide"? People HIDE things when they don't want to deal with the judgment of assholes. Are you hiring a private eye to dig into her history, stalking social media, talking to friends? What is an actual example of something you have found out about a woman and then used to discern her honesty?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:45 AM
9

Thinking a number is linked to traits other than "that person likes sex" is just as strange and inconsistent as thinking there must be some grand underlying reason 'why'. People react to trauma in different ways, some people have perfect lives and still turn into drug addicts, others had fucked up lives and avoid engaging in any kind of deviant behavior. Some people just like sex, so they go out and have it! No damage, trauma, or character flaws needed. The weird thing is that pills are trying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:40 AM
3

Why focus on number at all, if 'high n' and 'undesirable behaviors' are linked? Pill theory says women lie anyway, and behavior is all that matters....so why mention partner count at all if it can never be completely verified, and all the information that is important should be evident in her behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:25 AM
9

Other than what she says, how do you know what she treated others like? Don't women always lie about their history according to red ideas?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:19 AM
7

'subjective' because according to pill ideas women are not uniformly 'warped' by the same number of dicks on a sliding scale from 1 onwards? Or is it that one woman could be 'wife' material in the rp ideal sense of the term after a count of 5 or 7, while another woman transforms into full slut at 4? Or because men personally decide what counts as 'high'?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:16 AM
3

curiosity is reason enough
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 05:49 AM
1

I used your own logic and applied it to other examples. Those examples don't describe my personal opinion on any of the subjects. asking for material that you say supports your claims is suddenly unreasonable? if you can't be fussed that's fine, but don't pretend it's on account of 'outrage' and an undue level of scrutiny ​
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:05 AM
1

So men aren't really afraid of anything and their complaints aren't legitimate if they still have sex and date. Anal, oral, and condoms don't protect against false claims of rape and harassment, which I see many men insisting is a real and unavoidable threat. You made the assertion that women reclassify instances of harassment as 'fond memories' when they get older, thus 'proving' that it was never really horrible or harassment. I asked you to give examples of the articles. Your claim that "I wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 03:24 AM
1

With that reasoning, people can't really be afraid of the police, being robbed, or attacked ever in any way because they still live around other people, have homes, go to work, and otherwise participate in society. It also means that men aren't really scared of being 'tricked' by women getting pregnant on purpose, and that they are not really afraid of getting accussed of rape or harassment since they still pursue women. Do you have links to the articles you mentioned?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 01:55 AM
1

I am unfamiliar with the articles you are referencing, is it a series? Or is it a *type* of article you have noticed? Either way, a link would be helpful to understand what you mean. It's common for people to reminisce, and feel nostalgic about their younger days. However, no one that goes through a traumatic experience or uncomfortable about a situation later talks about *that* experience as though it was wonderful. There are opportunities to differentiate the bad experiences out, which is why …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 01:36 AM
6

If they agree it *hasn't* died, then they also *generally* say "well, it's not a big deal." I'm not sure which is more disheartening: having your experiences denied or downplayed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 01:00 AM
3

Seriously? None of these women would say a word if it were the right guy or guys doing this. People never go out to simply dance with friends? It's not about the 'right' or 'wrong' person, it's just the concept that people feel they are allowed to freely and casually touch others, regardless of what the person thinks and wants. Wearing clothes, being in a specific location, or having alcohol does not give everyone else permission to physically grope or touch anyone else. Clubs are not an extreme…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:57 AM
1

That's why I referred to it as an 'exercise' I couldn't think of a better term to accurately convey that: (1) this was part of an advertising campaign, (2) this was not an actual experiment or research effort The behaviors, frequency, and data surrounding how men and women are touched by other people in different context is an interesting topic. I don't know what I might or might not learn, all I know is that I'm curious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:52 AM
3

This sounds like a crude attempt to apply 'they asked for it' not based on clothing or behavior, but by virtue of entering a building where music plays and drinks are served. The implications are disturbing when people push certain things as 'normal' or 'likely.' Just because things are happening, does not mean they should continue to happen or that they need to be accepted. This seems disingenuous at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:48 AM
2

I agree one location for 3 women and only 4 hours isn't enough data. The entire topic seems very intriguing, and I can see other applications: homeless, children, elderly, disabled. Put sensors on an item that says "please do not touch" in a museum, and see how many people do. I don't know, this shit just seems interesting to me. I also always wonder if the cheap items at the front of stores are the most likely items that get stolen.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:41 AM
4

More information about this topic would not only help people understand what passes as 'average' and 'normal' for most people in different situation, it would also highlight differences within various contexts. You could add in another layer and look at different age groups. It sucks that your accounts are not believed by others. Are both men and women dismissing your stories? Are these friends, family, people online?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 12:36 AM
3

This goes along with something I else pointed out, and a user didn't like it. 'useful' twerp advice isn't new or original, it is normal advice that can be found anywhere (work out, flirt, be confident, figure out what you want). At the same time, they say it's the only place they can find 'truth'.... what they mean is "hate filled language that provides a structure where my inability to become a normal human is the fault of women and that I have been' deceived." They are encouraged to promote se…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 03:17 PM
3

The only upside. I'm torn about banning communities like this. There's an advantage to having them in one place where you can see the bullshit, on the other hand, having them around also suggests that what they say is somehow 'okay.' Quarantine seems like a good solution. They are still there, but people are warned about the kind of bullshit they are about to wade through. Not sure why RPW isn't quarantined though. Just because they try to paint their brand of twerpy bullshit as' less damaging' …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:58 PM
8

It is bullshit, but this is a group that also writes all women off as sluts and says that men are naturally selfless and noble... While also saying ONLY men can have meaningless sex without involving emotions, AND that there's a massive plot among women to 'play victim' for the sake of power. Yep, they don't believe stories about rape, and when abuse happens the woman is either exaggerating or she was 'asking for it.' The only legitimate anger is when a man is upset, and when women show anger it…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/18 02:30 PM
2

I love it when twerps try to paint any anger or irritation that is NOT their own as an exaggeration, unwarranted, or 'proof' of womyn being lesser. This conversation serves no purpose because you have displayed zero understanding that ALL I stand for is "humans not being shitty" and acceptance of people. Your fantasy that women have some stranglehold of victim power domination would be funny if it weren't so detached from reality. Male pain and issues are valid, but NOT when the people yelling a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:43 PM
2

Thanks, I'm new, but your comments, along with spacewhiskey's regularly stand out and are always a welcomed sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 04:32 PM
2

Acceptance does not mean "stay quiet and pretend racist, sexist, homophobic, and hateful ideas are spread."
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/18 12:33 AM
1

....It's not acceptable to call women (all or some) 'whores'. It's still horrible and wrong. A racist can't claim to be NON racist by 'clarifying' "Well, only some folks are (racial slur)" like that magically makes it acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 10:43 PM
1

> Also, your sexual past does not dictate how valuable you are as a human being, obviously; it might very well, however, dictate your value as a prospect in the dating market Either one is bad, but don't pretend that 'it's just a dating preference' when you have an entire group that labels women as 'losing value over time, and with every cock she encounters'. It's not "this is what I like", it's an entire group having hateful and angry conversations about women that *dare* to have sex, writing o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 07:08 PM
1

Even more importantly, society probably would not have *needed* to change that much if from the start, everyone just accepted everyone else. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 07:02 PM
2

The insane anti-trans, extreme feminists (which I have never encountered in real life) are disgusting. Just AS the anti-trans, sexist, women hating twerps are. I am not defending them, I don't associate with them, and I do not understand how or why they can even USE the term feminism at all, since it's about acceptance. Funny how hate groups like to say "not for you" as though that legitimizes and excuses the ideas they push. I don't care that it's 'not for me', or trans people - it pushes hate,…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 04:42 PM
1

They dismiss stories of abuse and rape, they go into great detail about how women are sluts, stupid, disloyal and cannot be trusted. They do nothing to earn consideration, and I'm not interested in attempts to explain away hate, hateful language, sexism, and ideas that damage both men and women as 'people just misunderstand what they reallllyyyy mean.' The in depth rants and detailed descriptions about how women lose worth because they dare to have sex, combined with their insistence that THEY a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 04:31 AM
1

rp as a community and the men that push hateful, sexist ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 02:31 AM
1

rp
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 02:12 AM
1

I thought twerps were supposed to be this alpha steel bad ass dudes... Yet the sight of a woman in a mini skirt threatens their concentration and moral values. It's hilarious that a group that labels all women as lying sluts claim to have morality that can be so easily offended.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 01:48 AM
1

Man hating feminists are just as awful as twerps, they are twins, mirror images of each other. A lot of femininity can be toxic too, for both men and women, same as toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 01:42 AM
2

Why should I be charitable towards a group that hates homosexuals and women? Please, EXPLAIN how "women are sluts" and the other bile that the twerp community vomits out is nuanced, compassionate, and tolerant.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 01:37 AM
2

Toxicity is bad in general. Any human can be shitty. But toxic masculinity describes behaviors. Not all men are masculine, or masculine in a damaging way (damaging to other men and women). Calling women sluts, saying they cannot love, or that they are children offers no room for variation - it paints an entire gender AS those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 12:45 AM
1

Ya mean like when twerps refer to all women as sluts, liars, and incapable of love? Those kinds of hate filled words?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/18 12:21 AM
3

Uh huh, 'blew up.' I love that the only time emotions are ever appropriate to pill heads are when THEY are passionate/irritated/angry/upset/annoyed. different social settings usually go along with varied attire so office vs on the street vs at the beach are all different. No one 'shoves breasts' in anyone's face unless it's a strip joint, club, or party. the variation of 'breasts' and the female body being 'pushed' on men is retarded, because i've seen it used to scold women for wearing any form…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 11:02 PM
1

'giant rant' lol just really weird that visually *seeing* a person can set off your morality alarm, or that another person's appearance has anything to do with your morals
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 10:35 PM
-2

That's just as shitty and horrible. "all strangers are a potential source of danger and can pose a threat" makes sense. When dating, I treat strangers with caution. Some people don't take rejection well.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 09:51 PM
2

Lots of things are 'distracting' - billboards, tourist attractions, advertisements, entertainment. Why does a stranger's idiotic sense of 'morality' matter so much that it should be allowed to control how others dress? Why should a stranger be responsible for 'sending messages x person deems worthwhile' to other people around them? aren't twerps all about 'DGAF' about other people's opinions? Oh wait...only MEN are allowed to do what they want. Womyns r alll slutz and has to be DOMINATED. /s In …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 07:16 PM
4

Why does 'how a woman dresses' have anything to do with you? ​ It's not a good example, because toxic masculinity DOES harm both men and women. When men think 'women are lying sluts' as a *default* that is not comparable to "I see a person walking around dressed in tight clothes"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:43 PM
2

Intolerant of bullshit, yeah. And again PLEASE explain why twerp anger is pushed as 'natural, rational, and reasonable' while any woman that doesn't giggle and thank the world for all the crap she has to deal with daily - while ALSO being told that it's 'no biggie' is written off as irrational? Why wouldn't I be angry at a group that is BUILT around the concept that women are inferior sluts that lie? My anger has exactly NOTHING to do with the conversation other than you don't like it and want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:17 PM
1

I've never pretended to like, or support twerps. LOL at 'derogatory' when talking about a group that defines women as lying sluts, children, incapable of love, and always manipulative... But yeah, 'twerp' is the TRULY offensive word. Men ALWAYS had autonomy over their bodies... Jfc you want to pretend that women's bodies and reproductive rights are just a free for all? That's why a guy can get snipped without fuss, yet women are told by doctors they shouldn't get long term IUDs. It's why abortio…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 04:43 PM
1

Thanks for the links
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 04:16 PM
1

Trp is exactly the same as women hating feminists (which I have never encountered in real life) then. Twerps care about men above women and they believe men are better than women. I have NEVER met a feminist, male or female, that thinks women are better than men. They support male and female issues. They think we are all human. Women didn't shit on men, society (run and controlled by white men) has formed a structure that harms both men and women. Everyone has shit to deal with, and women talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 04:15 PM
0

"Buhhhh if woman no fuck on demand, she lying bitch" - twerps How hard would it be to just fucking talk to her and explain what he's feeling? Oh wait. That would be direct and not passive aggressive... And as we all know, women will sieze all power to humiliate a man she's dating if he is direct and open with what he's feeling. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 04:08 PM
6

I don't know what you are, but asking a promiscuous woman "do you still expect commitment?" is a pretty fucked question. it implies rp alignment - as in, partner count has an effect on whether a woman SHOULD get commitment. People uninterested in monogamy should avoid it. There are many types of relationships. I was saying this a lot yesterday (which I don't expect you to know): people that cannot keep their word and remain monogamous, should stick to poly or casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 04:03 PM
2

I asked you why rp accepts your pain and not women's pain. I said people with trauma should get the help they need through various means, including therapy and support groups. I also specifically said your pain is valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:58 PM
2

No one I have met in the real world believes this kind of shit, or is a man hating feminist. In fact, I have never met anyone that hates men. I have met assholes that think they are better then women. But really, everyone around me, and everyone through my extended network are just.... People. With different quirks, and struggles. But no man hating Feminazis or women hating Chad's, or cucked and miserable feminist groveling males. Twerps and the psycho feminists are twins of each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:56 PM
5

You really just said "women aren't criticized" for their sexual choices... Yes we are. We are judged by everyone, and a lot of people have expectations based on those judgments. Whether it's as an easy lay, frigid bitch, or ugly. Women are used to being evaluated, judged, and told to be polite, or speak up - but not too loud, just get over it, stop being hysterical, don't cry. Why do twerps have this Disney delusion that all women just float through life without ever having real problems? Every …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:52 PM
2

I don't know who that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:41 PM
1

This is the kind of stuff I would expect middle school kids to worry about.... but even then, not to this degree. It must be so exhausting and lonely to think that EVERY. SINGLE. INTERACTION. Directly affects how fuck able you are to women, and how men are ranking you. This does not describe a normal social experience of men or women. They do not prevent themselves of interacting because of this. You need to find some friends, and have fun and just fucking STOP obsessing over petty shit. Treatin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:39 PM
2

Everyone can be damaged from shitty relationships. Abuse victims (either from growing up in an abusive house, or being abused by a sig. other) sometimes never learn to fully trust. There are a million different ways for life and the people around us to inflict damage. Sometimes unintentionally, sometimes deliberately. Maturity is understanding the risks, and making better choices, while NOT punishing future or current partners for fucked up shit that happened in the past. Twerps get so mad becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 03:30 PM
1

I don't know anyone here, and I don't care about reputation on a reddit sub. Some degree of attraction is necessary, and personality, charm, and quirks can make a person more attractive. Long term relationships and marriage should be based on more than looks, but it depends on what the priorities and motivations are. The happy married couple I know are attracted to each other physically and because of personality. There's an oldie's song "never make a pretty woman your wife" and it drives at a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:35 AM
1

Yeah, there are feminists just as horrible and stupid as twerps. Normal humans do not think like that, and the people that ARE that messed up are easy to spot....so just avoid them in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:29 AM
3

You are a random user on reddit. Why the fuck would anyone expect others to KNOW what they have said previously off the bat? You aren't interesting enough to warrant my time and focus to dredge through your post history. There's nothing wrong with finding hot people hot, it's when non-hot people expect to wind up with the super hot. It's not impossible, but it sure as hell ain't likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:25 AM
15

Twerps can't stand it when regular people behave contrary to their biases. They work so hard to twist every story to fit their their convoluted and fucked up ideas about how men and women interact.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:18 AM
5

You seriously gonna claim uggo men DON'T prefer hot women? Fun fact: people like hot people, regardless of where they fall on the hotness scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 06:14 AM
6

The idea that a person stops feeling attracted to another human because they have a sexual history is stupid. People can have whatever parameters they want, but those parameters and beliefs are subject to judgment. The way twerps describe female 'value' in terms of sexuality is stupid. Humans do not depreciate or increase in value every time they have sex. Any person that's made insecure by the knowledge that the person they are with is hot and has been desired by people prior to their arrival n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 05:58 AM
2

Yep, I'm pretty okay with that explanation, in fact. You didn't watch it at all then, or you didn't understand it. The entire show (Netflix) is about the complications, hypocrisies, blind spots, tension, and hilarity revolving around race and gender. It's criticizes everyone, because everyone is flawed. The main female lead is a lighter skinned middle class black woman, with one white and one black parent. She becomes a hard line pro-feminist and pro-black activist. She criticizes and looks down…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 01:34 AM
2

Mine just wants to chitter at everything on the other side of the window and take 14 hour naps between meals. Patriarchy is just men running shit and making things awful for men and women across the US and the majority of the world for the sake of power and profit. It's the thing that put women on pedestals (if you buy into universal cunt worship, which twerps seem to agree is a thing), and also decided men are cannon fodder.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 01:17 AM
1

That was more of a rhetorical question, but I appreciate the answer. I've never read vice before (that I know of), I was just going off the title of the post. If I get around to reading it, I may come back and add more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 12:56 AM
13

No (sane) woman that decides to have sex with a man is then going to yell angrily about how he made her orgasm. Why is anyone surprised that making a partner climax is partially a confirmation that you are a good partner, and partially about making the other person feel good? I was always proud that my ex bfs were satisfied, it was irrefutable proof that I was attentive and skilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 12:26 AM
3

People cheat when they decide they want sex with another person *more* than they want to keep their word to be exclusive and faithful. I see cheating justified due to limited sex with their partner. Solution: break up. And now I'm watching people try to paint 'sex with randos' as some uncontrollable and inevitable outcome that women should just accept, which is bullshit. No one that enters into a monogamous dynamic should then be told to tolerate infidelity as a foregone conclusion. If men are s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 12:11 AM
3

Seriously why is "if you love someone, honor your promises to them, and do not do things that hurt them" so fucking controversial and hard to comprehend? People are literally trying to excuse infidelity as "no big deal" because womyns just misunderstand men. ANYONE can fuck without emotions involved, but the whole point of creating a mono relationship is because you both CHOOSE to only have sex with one other person. I cannot imagine why it's necessary to excuse shitty behavior, when the solutio…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/18 12:07 AM
3

What analysis? It's no different from saying that men are wrong for getting upset when a woman cheats (which, any man *in* a monogamous relationship or married would be). Men just don't understand that women can fuck others without involving any emotions. If a man is hurt by a woman cheating, it's because when she fucks another man, she is destroying the way she made her spouse *feel* loved. The description is that "people can fuck without emotion, while being in love with their partner" - the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:56 PM
2

This. The biggest issue I have observed is when one person *pretends* to be okay with a poly dynamic, secretly thinking the other person will spontaneously switch to monogamy because they are such an incredible partner. Outside of poly, so many relationships within the kink community often couples that have a kink partner with others. Honesty about needs, communication, tolerance, patience, and compassion go a long way in any kind of relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:45 PM
3

Poly and BDSM folks have various arrangements like this. Some work, some don't. It depends on a lot of things. There is no universal model that guarantees success or failure, because relationships thrive and fail as the result of the individuals *in* the relationship. ​ Personally, one partner is enough. If a man wants my fidelity, loyalty, financial and emotional investment - then I expect the same from him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:41 PM
7

Please clarify whether you are poking fun at yourself for being neurotic, or trying to brag about how smart you are. Inquiring minds would like to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:30 PM
1

Edited.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:20 PM
1

My mistake, was arguing with someone else about a different topic and I didn't confirm which thread this was. Will edit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:16 PM
1

It's fine to describe love and sex as naturally non-monogamous and to pursue relationships compatible with that outlook. If you like eating meat, don't tell a vegan you are happy going without steak, and then blame the vegan when they get upset after catching you eating a burger. Misrepresenting needs and desires is stupid. My issue with the original poster is that they claimed 'women are getting it wrong' and by extension, should not be upset, when they are cheated on. The reality is that men (…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 11:12 PM
1

It's not a 'male' or 'female' thing, anyone is capable of having emotionless sex. ​ The ONLY problem is when idiots lie about what they can live with. ​ I object to anyone that tries to justify abuse, lying, or infidelity because "that's the way I am."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 10:42 PM
2

as of 2016 73.7% of the US is christian...they are not a minority, they are not persecuted, and they are certainly not vilified in the same way other religions and minorities are...but you also think whites are being marginalized simply because the media is including more diversity....next you'll tell me that "Dear White People" is about hating white people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 10:38 PM
2

you just said "Christian-shaming" with, what I assume, was a straight face... Yeah. The poor, powerless christians that are CLEARLY underrepresented, ignored, and have a long history of constantly being portrayed as villains and evil in media. I'm sure christians can't go outside or walk around without being eyed suspiciously or profiled.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 09:34 PM
6

People can love more than one person at a time, and they should pursue poly or non-committed relationships that allow them to engage with multiple partners emotionally and physically. The issue is when a person AGREES to the confines of monogamy, and promises to observe those boundaries..... but then ignores the promises they made and cheats. Don't enter into monogamous relationships if you want to fuck and love multiple people at once. Don't pretend a person is being unreasonable when their spo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:46 PM
12

If a person does something that they know will hurt the other person and be seen as an act of betrayal - then they do not love that person more than they value their own desires. Example: when a spouse has sex with people outside a monogamous marriage. Men and women can have meaningless sex because they want to, without involving emotions. However, it's still cheating and betraying their partner to do so without full transparency and agreement. I'm not crazy about poly relationships, but there a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:28 PM
5

Because it does happen consistently, and it's obvious because the condom either has a deposit or not. There are other ways to work with a partner to orgasm as well. Get a gf or wife and have all the raw rides you can stand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:16 PM
3

Women can't get their tubes tied as easily as men can get snipped, and there is a lot of fear mongering and dismissal when it comes to IUDs in the US. So "equality demands" that people stop trying to control women's bodies in the form of access to BC and abortion. I am all for male pills, but your claims that it is some pressing injustice is batshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:14 PM
7

Your problem is that you think sex is "life's single pleasure". Even with male BC, the number of women that will have raw sex won't be that high... Because STDs etc, and then, why would a woman take your word that you are on the appropriate medication, it's the same. You are right back at square one, with women not trusting random males, just as males distrust random females. A lot of women do not us BC, because it fucks them up and comes with a long list of horrible side effects. The solution? …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 07:10 PM
6

It's called a vasectomy. Male pills are in development. If a woman is on BC, the man benefits as well. Where are all these women running around fucking dozens of men without condoms? If a strange, unknown woman is willing to fuck raw... That should be a warning. Pregnancy is NOT the only concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 06:14 PM
5

So get a vasectomy, wear a condom, stick to prostitutes, go without sex (you'll survive), select better women, or stick to anal. Condom sex still feels better than no sex at all. People are pretending that condoms are like wrapping a cactus around the dick, even though male orgasm is expected and consistently happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 06:10 PM
2

Anyone that thinks either gender should behave a certain way, dismisses anything that strays from heterosexuality, labels trans people as 'abberations', thinks some races are inherently 'better', and normalizes hate and sexism deserves every once of shame they receive. This is part of what determines which people are decent and which ones are part of the problem. I am neutral towards everyone, until they push hate and prejudice. This is why I am friends with some religious folks, and not with ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 05:58 PM
1

Twerps love to think they created the idea that males suffer and face inequality in certain ways and should be heard. Humans are human. Race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, and social class does not dictate which people are good and which ones are bad. There is no competition for 'biggest victim', and people that BELIEVE some strangers are better than others because of one of those traits, lose all credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 05:02 PM
3

Oh, I know my type, I just have zero interest in others 'telling me about myself' or using it as a convenient excuse to dismiss anything I say 'because type.' I already have twerps playing that game with relentless abandon because: tits. It's just another bullshit way for people to unilaterally decide which opinions are valid or as a justification to dismiss others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:56 PM
1

Well, I guess if men and women can be boiled down to a set of universal, and inescapable behaviors (according to twerps), why not throw in additional ways to classify and control people based on personality type? /s There's a difference between general trends, average behavior... and locking everyone into small boxes that remove all nuance and individuality. How is this any different from "you are wrong because you are (race/religion/gender/sexuality)"? My type is "LMAO".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:45 PM
5

Wait... As in MBTI? Do people use it seriously (beyond "oh that's interesting") here? Is there a personality ranking hierarchy? Because that's horrifying, hilarious, and unbelievable all at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:35 PM
2

Why would I care about 'shaming' a group that says I am incapable of logic, love, and honesty? I support male issues, which has nothing to do with twerp bullshit. Anyone that thinks either gender should behave a certain way, dismisses anything that strays from heterosexuality, labels trans people as 'abberations', thinks some races are inherently 'better', and normalizes hate and sexism deserves every once of shame they receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:22 PM
8

What twerps don't seem to understand is that I find them JUST AS disgusting and unreasonable as extreme, highly niche feminists. Both sides are mirror images, the difference? I have seen far MORE twerps and manosphere digits in real life, and I have never run into the insane-man-hating feminist. I live in a very liberal state. These smug assholes think they are hard to spot... they really aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:17 PM
62

This is also how women fall in love. Sometimes men and women notice someone cute or hot and trip into lust land. Sometimes a neutral person becomes attractive because of their personality. The only surprising thing is that anyone thinks the process is exclusive or unique TO one gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:12 PM
1

Dumbaustisticragemonster describes all pill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:07 PM
2

In comedy, male 'violence' (slapstick etc) is funny because it's an inversion of reality (men being weak). The trodden over husband by an overbearing wife is funny, because it's relatable, but has been around since "I Love Lucy" etc Real life male abuse is not funny. But men are also more likely to take risk, act out physically (and have those physical acts create more damage) than women. This is why Jackass and so many outrageous videos are MEN doing dumb shit. They take more risks and find it …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 04:03 PM
5

Female babies are so valuable that they are literally thrown away and left to die in numbers far higher than male. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 03:36 PM
18

It's because their basic assumption is that women are 'in control' and have it better then men, accross the board. Obviously, if women can get abortions and take BC - it has to be easy, and amazing. Why would a group that dismisses what women think as a baseline rule, and whole-heartedly believe that women are ALWAYS playing some angle to subjugate men unfairly, believe a woman when she talks about the drawbacks? It's just 'hamstering'. Women bitch and play 'the victim' because they (twerps) ALS…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 03:17 PM
4

For some reason pill aligned men are determined to prove how 'scary' modern sex is for men. for all their talk about masculinity.... They sure do bitch like school girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/18 03:11 PM
2

No, that isn't the literal thought pattern, but it describes far too many end results. Having a baby, in the hopes that dad will stay forever, or that a baby will fix things. The resignation many talk about is just as heartbreaking. As a society, we need to do more to help impoverished communities thrive, and there are many issues at play (opportunity, access to resources, education, eliminating drug and gang related activities and violence, police brutality). It's a shame that certain aspects o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 03:44 AM
4

What you are describing is a normal process of learning from past experiences, and adjusting preferences for a better match. Going after the same type of person, without adjusting, refining, or learning (both about what you want and what you have to offer) makes no sense. Who cares about consistency if it continually leads to failure and disappointment? There are generally core values that do not change from one guy to the next. Are you trying to say that men do not make any adjustments to what …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 03:22 AM
6

Why would anyone be more qualified than you to figure out what you should change? Do you not learn from your experiences and make observations about the people around you? If you read advice that sounds worthwhile, who cares if it comes from a man or a woman? What is going on in your life that you need endless dating advice? People always know the answers before they ask for feedback, they just might not want to face it until someone makes them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:42 AM
1

No guy with options is going to waste that kind of time to fuck a woman, and women can smell desperation. Normal women are not in fear of being plated, nor do they have difficulty forming relationships. The 'hard' part is finding a guy to marry, if that's important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:37 AM
1

How does this relate to your profession?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:25 AM
1

But that pops the revenge fantasy of dried up whores that go from hot to worthless. /s Seriously though. People are marrying older (after college, once they have jobs), and it depends on where you look. Military folks generally get hitched younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:23 AM
1

This has never been my experience or the experience of anyone I went to college with. People fucked because they wanted to, and often times that evolved into a relationship. Other didn't fuck until after they became serious. There is zero requirement for a woman to put out ASAP as a way to eliminate the possibility that the man is just out for sex. That's just a sure fire way to increase her sex partner count (which some women care about, and others don't), and get ghosted anyway once she tries …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/18 12:17 AM
2

It's an issue of class, not education. Impoverished communities have young moms, that then raise the next generation of young moms and absent fathers. Religion doesn't matter the way it once did (there are exceptions), and it's hard to think "a kid will fuck up my life" if it's already a mess, and many people you know have kids. Having free condoms and bc helps, but it's not a solution. Better to have activities and get people to care about their future and dream for more than "three baby daddie…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 11:14 PM
5

Many twerps like to pretend they have plates... When the reality is that everyone involved in that sort of thing is hooking up with other people. It's a power delusion when rp folks talk about how well 'trained' their plates are.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 10:59 PM
0

I meet lots of good men, and when we decide to be friends or part ways, no one loses their shit. When a polite reason for moving on, then becomes a series of questions and guilt tripping or worse...then ghosting is perfectly fine. If I decide I no longer want to associate with someone, I am not obligated to give them a reason unless I decide to. Again, I am talking specifically about how to stop contact and disengage. If I've decided to move on, it doesn't matter if he's a good guy or an asshole…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 09:39 PM
2

Not worried about it regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 09:34 PM
1

Not quite. An African White Bellied Pangolin and a Greater Sooty Owl.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 09:18 PM
1

I hope no victims ever have the misfortune of dealing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:40 PM
2

These views are the result of my experiences and the people I work with. Once again, you are minimizing things ("stalked once"). Guess what genius, it wasn't once, and it wasn't one guy. It's better to treat potential guys as a possible threat, and take the least confrontational avenue: ghosting, polite excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:37 PM
1

I work with abuse victims, so yeah, your theory that AWALT is real, and that it protects women is idiotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:26 PM
1

Men are victims of violence against other men... Not women they reject after a date or talking online for a week. If you want things to change, understand why women ghost and try to deesculate, don't ignore the point and label it as 'unwilling to be uncomfortable". Anyone can be an asshole, the issue with saying "people ghost for no reasons" is that fools take that as justification for being angry with women. Yeah, it happens, but that's not the point. You were wholly ready to argue "women do it…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:24 PM
1

I use it specifically in terms of trying to stop interactions with men... Not string them along and hose them for goodies. Being realistic isn't fear mongering, and as someone that HAS been stalked and threatened, I'm not about to pretend that it's a good idea to just sit back and hope for the best. Diplomacy often fails, and ghosting just bruises the ego for a second... If it lasts longer than that, you were too invested for that stage of the process.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 08:13 PM
1

Written by someone that has never interacted with a woman in an abusive relationship, and has zero understanding about abusive relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 07:47 PM
2

That's fair, my willingness to consider identical height has to do with the fact that i am 6'00".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 07:38 PM
3

The fact that you said "of course men are prone to flipping out" as though it is normal, and should not be considered as wrong or concerning says a lot. It IS the point, because women will give a false reason for ending things, or ghost, because they have learned that honesty almost always leads to escalation. Women use the best diffusing tactics they can to decrease the likelihood of things becoming dangerous. It's not about discomfort, it's about safety. You know why women play 'hard to get'? …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 07:11 PM
11

I will never understand how men can ignore and trivialize how quickly things can go to shit for women, even when they are as polite as possible. Ghosting is often safer than trying to give any reason to many guys. Women overall have a lot more social intelligence, and learn from a young age to pick up on how important words, and behavior are... and unfortunately, most men have to work hard to try and learn those things.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 06:21 PM
8

This. There are some giraffe chasers, but the vast majority of women just want a man taller than she is, and many are okay with guys that are the same height. Men with awful personalities and the charm of moldy cheese like to blame height for their lack of success.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 06:09 PM
1

I have gone on dates with men shorter than myself (I'm 6'00"). If he's my height or only a little shorter, I'm willing to make an exception, but he has to compensate for it in other ways (an amazing personality for example). The annoying thing is when men lie about their height (online dating), and they think I won't notice when they only come up to my chin. No one wants to be deceived by outdated photos, or short men that think they can get away with that shit. It's hilarious how salty twerps g…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 06:05 PM
5

The people that married young around me weren't high value, they were just religious. Marrying later in life (after college) has been a general trend for a while now. People put it off because religion doesn't have the same degree of importance overall, and it's normal to support yourself and establish a career. Despite RP claims of 'female desperation' and male value skyrocketing once people enter their 30's, things are how they've always been. There's just less partying, and better venues when…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 07:31 AM
0

By your own logic, racism is also "therapeutic". It's just a way to counteract perceived advantages that minorities are afforded. A sensible way to 'reclaim' white identity (as though whites have never been in power). It's just as disgusting and repulsive as when extreme feminists paint all men as abusive rapists.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 07:02 AM
5

Weird: they want feminine women, but only ones that have positive feminine traits. Traditional and feminine women that will not put up with a guy that refuses to marry, wants to spin them as a plate, and forgo having children. Damaging: the sheer amount of anger, power fantasy bullshit, and ego stroking that goes on to compensate for a slice of the population that was too dense and a normal to figure out how to function normally with the opposite sex. If it wasn't so repulsive, I'd almost feel b…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/18 05:37 AM
4

Chiming in, because, why not? Feminity is learned, the expressions of Feminity vary from culture to culture, although there are similarities. It's often accompanied with politeness, etiquette, clothing that highlights the female form... 'non-threatening' youthful behaviors that make guys feel all strong and masculine. The idea of innocence also plays a role, though it does not have to be genuine innocence, and is easily feigned. Youthful, happy, optimistic, kind, generous. The feminine woman tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 10:58 PM
1

Why/how could she know it was a deal breaker? I may have missed a comment where the OP stated that sexual history is a deal breaker. I didn't notice any comments where she guilt tripped him? If he was happy with her for 8 months, and something that she can't change, is suddenly reason to break up is pretty dumb. She volunteered the information casually and out of the blue, so clearly she did NOT know it was a deal breaker. I agree people can have whatever dating criteria they want, I think it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 10:03 PM
1

That makes zero sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 06:56 AM
1

How?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 03:10 AM
1

He didn't want to have sex... All she did was respect that. If a vegetarian orders a salad, you can't say the restaurant is denying that person steak when a salad is delivered, as ordered. Respecting another person's wishes is in no way the same as withholding or denying something from that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 01:34 AM
1

Why? You said she was denying him sex, when in reality he was choosing to wait and she respected that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/18 12:08 AM
1

Does that change your take on the situation? You seemed pretty certain that things unfolded a specific way...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 11:41 PM
2

The original OP of the other thread says they didn't have sex because HE wasn't ready. She was willing to wait until he was ready. "OP here. I took time to process the information as she told me 8 moths in, she knew my views but was nervous to tell me. I never called her a slut or tried to degrade her, nor would I ever call anyone a slut(except for Dwight). It was my choice to not have sex. She was willing to wait till I was ready."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/18 06:20 PM
2

That is patently false. The advice is not hard to find. Work out? Have a life? Be confident? All normal stuff. The manipulative "women are children" and sexist justifications are the unique portion. Rp looked at pua and said "nah, this hasn't been pushed far enough." It's garbage that disguises sexism and hate as "distilled truth", it's a cult where everyone tries to outdo each other with more and more extreme ideas, and everyone virtually sucks each other off because at least within those group…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 07:36 PM
5

I can't believe anyone can say that trp does not encourage abusive behaviors and attitudes: never trust a woman assume she will fuck around and cheat treat her like a child women are all the same women are incapable of loving men dominate and control women lie to get what you want it's okay to make a woman feel insecure and scared women are sluts and replaceable, the best woman you know is a lying whore It's disgusting how blatantly manipulative and abusive these mindsets are. The icing on the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 10:06 AM
1

Exactly this. Every piece of supposed 'good rp advice' example is just common fucking sense that you can find anywhere. The worst part is that twerps dip normal advice in a vat of bullshit and make it destructive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 09:57 AM
8

The fact that people want to pretend there is some great female conspiracy to oppress, castrate, and control men, when they are unquestionably the more privileged sex is truly disturbing. And before any twerps lose their shit, yes, there are some male issues. It's not a contest, and having issues doesn't excuse shitty ideas that encourage men to treat women like brainless twits.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 09:54 AM
1

Normal humans don't obsess over evo psych. You haven't explained why it matters as a beneficial aspect or what it has to do with anything other than the free pass to justify shitty attitudes. Normal humans just figure shit out by talking to each other. There aren't elaborate games that confine men and women into limited boxes. The useful advice is normal (flirt, have fun, create tension, stay fit) and can be found anywhere. The alpha-beta-cockcarousel bullshit that the pills push is unique and d…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 04:24 AM
1

Yeah the 'originality' involves bullshit theories about how men have to be arrogant assholes, treat women like garbage, and think of women as lesser beings that expire when they turn 30. Those are damaging concepts that make men believe they can never be honest, and behave in a paranoid manner worrying about 'power', instead of just being an actual human and connecting with other humans. The 'unique' stuff is garbage and exactly why all the pill communities are harmful. Hate is hate, and all the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 04:11 AM
1

You seem to not understand that my 'not unique' statement is tied exclusively to the only portion of advice from the original thread that is useful. The useful and applicable advice is normal and can be found anywhere. Boiling women down to AWALT copies is unique to trp and horrible and men would be better off avoiding that type of thinking. "chase your partner" is not unique. Men and women can find that anywhere. The useful advice is common, the weird and harmful trappings are unique to trp - t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:59 AM
1

I said the useful advice is normal, I disagree however that the bulk of trp advice is useful. You brought up evo psych, most people don't use it or think about it. Most people date without diving into the cesspit of rp ideas. You have yet to explain how or why evo psych is a benefit, as opposed to a bullshit excuse to twist things into a system that tells men to be manipulative and paranoid while treating women as garbage. The useful advice is normal, and can be found anywhere. The fucked up ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:49 AM
1

What 'evo psych' is in this thread? Telling a guy to be assertive and sexual in a way to create excitement? Not unique advice. I'm not the one saying evo psych is a benefit - you are. Whenever I see it used with terps it's as a fucked up justification for unhealthy behaviors and tactics. You keep shifting focus.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:40 AM
1

I said the advice from the post is mostly normal and common (pursue your partner, create a varied and lively sex life). You haven't explained why evo psych matters in any way as a useful aspect to dating, when the bulk of humanity rolls along just fine without it. The only 'worthwhile' parts of trp are common sense. The only 'unique' aspect is the vitriol and damaging classifications of men and women. My stance hasn't changed: (1) the decent advice from this example is common sense, and (2) trp …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:30 AM
1

Why does evo psych matter? Humans have dated, fucked, married, and rolled along just fine without looking at it. There's no reason to use random comparisons instead of just saying what you mean. You first said "trp doesn't need to be unique to be valid" and now you are saying "it is unique and therefore valid". I already said that the only 'unique' aspect is the damaging way the community talks about men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:14 AM
2

I am saying that the only 'original' thing about trp and mrp is the damaging attitudes towards men and women, and that men can learn how to be normal functioning humans sans insecurities and anger elsewhere. I don't know why you jump to religion, it doesn't apply. Public vs private school might be a better example, but either way it's unnecessary clutter. Trp is not unique and insightful advice, therefore men could learn how to date and flirt from healthier, less fucked up places. All the subs o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 03:02 AM
5

Except normal dating and sex advice doesn't CLAIM to be revolutionary and unique and contain secrets that can't be found anywhere else. Twerps do make those claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 12:58 AM
6

I can understand it if the relationship deliberately incorporates some level of playful denial. It's not an uncommon kink in BDSM circles. Here's the thing though: all involved parties talk about how they enjoy being denied. It isn't unilaterally decided by one party for REASONS. Imagine the outrage if a woman were to work a twerp up to an almost orgasm, only to completely stop and walk away. They would be furious. Worse, they might be encouraged to just 'take what they want'. Many women, even t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 12:56 AM
5

Nononono, women are light switches. We're either 'on' or 'off'....there's no room for nuance or degrees of arousal. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 12:31 AM
2

I told you what I think, you just don't seem to like or agree with what I have to say, which is fine. I don't understand how a total stranger can 'disappoint' you however. You appear quite adamant about trying to say how wonderful, hot, and healthy *this one post is*... There's nothing wrong with wanting your guy to be assertive. The best thing you can do is get him excited, or talk to him about what you'd enjoy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 12:24 AM
4

The only originality I see are convoluted 'theories' that work really hard to push a damaging and dehumanizing agenda that ultimately harm everyone. It's normal advice twisted into the ugliest possible form. There's also the issue that many terps are adamant about how unique, original, and special their ideas are. That these things *cannot* be found elsewhere, which is why those communities exist. It's a brand that claims to offer 'truth' that the rest of society is working hard to obscure and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/18 12:10 AM
2

The advice is common sense - so I do accept *that*. What I don't accept is that a group of people that spout hate and push overwhelmingly damaging ideas should be *praised* because they manage to hit on something 'okay' once in a while. PPD is a sub for arguing about ideas. I'm not sure why you think it's so important to throw them a cookie just because they stumbled across a normal vein of advice. Getting a minor thing mostly right, doesn't change the mountain of shit they get wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 11:54 PM
4

I understand that it's not advice for women, but it's not this earth shattering piece of insight that could or can only be divined from a pill sub. A slightly less repulsive thread that contains common sense and normalish thoughts on an otherwise horrid sub does not mean the community is 'healthy'. I understand the audience is supposed to be for men, but it's silly to pretend that men can't find this type of advice other places.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 11:33 PM
5

It's crazy to me that any of this is credited to 'RP' when everyone I know would say that sustaining an active sex life involves effort, creativity, and participation from everyone in the relationship. I mean, "yay" for mostly proactive and positive advice....but I don't think 'common sense' should be portrayed as a special concoction that RP dreamed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 11:28 PM
9

Happy couples flirt and tease each other. Both people look for ways to entice and excite their partner. Intimacy is also about connecting with each other, making sure that you both do things together. Relationships require active participants. The biggest issue I see, is that you are wanting and waiting for your husband to do something that you could easily spark yourself. Everyone wants to feel surprised and desired. I bet you could get the ball rolling simply by surprising him with a blowjob o…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 11:22 PM
1

Relationships are highly variable, and what works for one may be a disaster in another. That makes sense. I agree that relationships can appear to be one thing (either healthy or abusive), and in reality be another thing...at least to an extent. If you know someone really well and spend time with them, and see how the couple interacts then you can get a pretty good idea most of the time. Many married couples that have 30 or more years under the belt don't care who the fuck is around if they need…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 09:30 PM
9

I always laugh at the notion that women are simultaneously identical and easy to figure out - yet we are also naturally manipulative geniuses that can coerce men into doing anything we want.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 08:53 PM
1

I think there's a big problem if someone dates another person that they dream of changing. It's more *likely* that when two people click and start to see long term potential, they both naturally start to make each other a priority. Part of that process includes taking steps to create the type of life they both want. It's concerning that you seem to think it's impossible for men to want a family or marriage....or that you think EVERY WOMAN wants marriage and a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 08:50 PM
3

You've never seen a healthy relationship before? How do you define 'healthy'?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 08:46 PM
6

The more OP writes, the worse I feel for that poor little girl. Whenever my dad was home (he traveled a lot for work) he spent every possible moment with my siblings and me. I used to follow him around. Little kids are not hard to amaze and entertain. Everything is new and interesting. I remember trying to brush my hair the way my dad did, and playing with plastic tools because I spent a lot of time in the garage with him, and he would just go through and let me look at and touch the tools he us…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 07:51 PM
4

April and Andy too!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 06:30 PM
3

That's quite the assortment of wildly uninformed conclusions you made there. I'm not part of the kink or BDSM community. I know people that are, along with reading about it, and following some youtube channels because I find different group dynamics and social circles interesting. There are many different types of relationships and bonds between people though. A man or woman can be a submissive, dominant, master, slave, big, little, owner, pet, switch, or other things entirely. Some dynamics are…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 05:57 PM
11

All I know is that anyone with *actual* knowledge of kink and BDSM hates the misinformation and harmful ideas the books push. Then again, a lot of people in the kink and BDSM communities like to blow smoke about consent and negotiation, even though there are innumerable issues with people pushing past and ignoring limits...but that's another discussion. I applaud the fact that you were committed enough to write all this up, however I also think you are possibly overthinking it. Many women enjoy …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/18 05:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter