| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Justice is servedAs I said, the terminology should be changed. The question however was if women can be held accountable to the same degree as men which they can. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 03:00 PM |
| -1 | Justice is servedTo be clear "causing sexual activity without consent" is not classified as rape. Instead its another crime that can have the same liability as rape. So while it never says it's rape the woman might still be liable for the same punishment. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 01:06 PM |
| 2 | Justice is servedThe rape law is redundant though. The punishment the offender is liable for is exactly the same, word for word. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 12:12 PM |
| 2 | Justice is served(c) penetration of a person's anus or vagina with a part of B's body or anything else | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 11:38 AM |
| 2 | Justice is servedIt does though. To be clear person B is the victim. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 11:33 AM |
| 2 | Justice is servedHopefully. As I said I'm all for the changing of definition. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 11:31 AM |
| 2 | Justice is servedWell yes. Though that's obviously not something that can be fixed by changing definitions in laws. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 11:18 AM |
| 2 | Justice is servedWomen can be held equally accountable for rape though. According to the "Causing sexual activity without consent" part of the Sexual Offences Act: (4) A person guilty of an offence under this section, if the activity caused involved— (a) penetration of B’s anus or vagina, (b) penetration of B’s mouth with a person’s penis, (c) penetration of a person’s anus or vagina with a part of B’s body or by B with anything else, or (d) penetration of a person’s mouth with B’s penis, is liable, on convictio… | /r/PussyPassDenied | 10/02/21 11:07 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter