TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlitheCynic Archive

View 0 posts and 192 comments by BlitheCynic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You asked QUESTIONS. I answered them and provided resources for more information. It wasn't a GOTCHA. You obviously don't take this seriously since you just told me to read any old book on the list as opposed to picking one relevant to the matter we were discussing, so please just stop wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 11:52 PM
8

Of course, the book is a suggestion for if you actually have a desire for understanding and insight, not simply to "win" against a stranger online. If you just want to argue with no intention of actually learning something new, then don't read the book and don't bother replying to me anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:49 PM
3

I want you to do the work. You're welcome to come back and say whatever you want about the book if you actually bother to read it. I think you have an inflated sense of your own critical thinking skills, though, just going off your "logic" that has been on display so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:46 PM
5

If you have more genuine and good faith questions about how women end up with abusive men, I suggest you read "Why Does He Do That?" by Lundy Bancroft. Once you've read it, come back and we can discuss.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:20 PM
3

It's targeted at everyone. Reread the part where I said societal messaging paints women as generally untrustworthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:14 PM
3

"Sometimes" anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:13 PM
4

"In the past twelve months" is a VERY different statistic. As for your Saturday evening, that's fine, but maybe don't start a debate you aren't willing to see through.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:11 PM
5

The entire purpose of the nuclear family is to produce workers while wringing free labor out of women. If it's being destroyed, that is a wonderful development I would like to see continued.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:00 PM
3

Source? Also % of perpetrators by gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:43 PM
5

She said WHEN they know. They often don't know because abusive men love bomb and turn up the charm at first and then take off their masks once the woman is on the hook. I do wish more women would listen to other women when they say that a man abused, harassed, or assaulted them instead of believing the man when he insists that she is just a crazy/jealous/vindictive bitch. But this is an uphill battle against ubiquitous social messaging that women are untrustworthy, and it's not women's fault tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:38 PM
11

Making jokes about dick size. It's body shaming and it's not cool or constructive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:31 PM
3

No, I don't date.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:44 AM
5

I am a woman. I know a lot of women who date men. We talk to each other. This is not a sentiment that I have even remotely seen expressed by any woman I have ever met in my life, at any level of social interaction. You really think you know more about women as someone who has fucked a couple than a woman who has spent her whole life with close female friends? We talk about everything with each other, buddy. EVERYTHING.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:44 AM
5

Anyway, support for male birth control is widespread within feminist circles and is easily the default feminist position. With the exception of possibly a few extremely fringe radfems (but, again, the default position even among radfems is extremely pro-male birth control), most women who feel otherwise are almost certainly not going to be coming from a feminist standpoint and probably are more likely to oppose birth control and non-procreative sex in general. They likely believe that childbeari…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:26 AM
2

I don't understand the phrasing of that question. Are you asking if I date women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:15 AM
6

So...you are completely speculating about the sentiments of a small subset of women based on anecdotes and personal experience and stating it as hard fact for women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 07:07 AM
4

:'D
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 05:10 AM
6

Ok, but does the human race matter objectively? Or is it something that you personally care about? There's no intrinsic value in humans achieving a utopia or conquering the solar system. I also happen to be pretty confident that will never happen but that's another discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:36 AM
11

Yeah. People who never gave it any real thought might say. It's kicking the can of meaninglessness. That's all it is. By all means, have kids if you want to. If it will fulfill you. But stop all this aggrandizing crap about it. It may give you a subjective sense of purpose, but it still won't give your life inherent meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:12 AM
13

Contrary to popular belief among men, there are actually so, so many more fun things to do out there than fuck men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:09 AM
6

Gotta keep kicking that existential can down the road right?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:07 AM
4

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:06 AM
4

Are you a single woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:05 AM
8

"Chase careers and party" is a funny way of saying "be financially independent."
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:04 AM
21

I've actually never seen a woman get annoyed with that. Most women I know would love a male birth control option because hormonal birth control is very rough on their bodies and they don't trust condoms alone. I think a male birth control option would be amazing!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 01:53 AM
21

Having the choice not to have kids is unequivocally empowering, even if the reasons for making that choice have to do with unfortunate circumstances like the economy or a poor outlook on the future (which only accounts for a portion of cases - many women just don't want kids, or don't want more than 2!). Do you think women in the past who had mobs of kids could always afford them? Of course many of them couldn't, but they didn't get much say in the matter. They had kids whether they could afford…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/23 11:51 PM
3

Now apply that attitude to the rest of your worldview, and you will be much, much happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:39 AM
6

I doubt that, since you are obviously 14.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:36 AM
10

You over-identify with the (perceived) accomplishments of your sex because you have no accomplishments of your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 10:09 AM
10

"Not all men!"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 06:12 AM
1

I would be glad because I always ask for theirs and offer mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:47 PM
1

I don't want sexy sons. That's weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:37 PM
1

No really, since obviously there's still a need for prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:33 PM
2

That almost sounds primitively superstitious.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:33 PM
1

I wouldn't be, as long as I knew he was safe and respectful.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/16 07:31 PM
1

Don't vote for them for President.
/r/askTRP09/05/16 06:53 PM
1

What is skinny-fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/16 08:36 PM
1

No, I have cats.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/15 09:25 PM
1

I suppose my difficulty is that this information doesn't exist in a vacuum - for me, at least, it just leads to more questions. For example, from there I would ask, what are the comparable percentages of violence against women in games and violence against men that take place outside of combat, i.e. civilian violence? A lot of the discussion about violence against women in media refers to noncombatants. Of course this opens up a bunch of other questions: Does the discussion really refer to nonco…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:38 PM
1

I think the problem with arguing about representation is that you are never going to get a comprehensive list of representations in all media. So even if you can give a bunch of examples that demonstrate your point, how many do you need to make it meaningful? 10? 20? 50? I encounter this difficulty both when I am defending and arguing against feminist claims. I would say if you can get a list of the 25 top-selling games that involve violence against people and prove your point for 15-20 of them,…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:21 PM
1

He would probably need to back this up with evidence. I don't game much, so I can't agree or disagree, but I find the claim interesting. Do you have any good sources on it?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:44 PM
1

Outrageous content aside, does anyone else find that headline exploitative and gross?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:07 PM
2

It's all bullshit.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:05 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the specific person who went to the police only do so because a) the behavior was consistent for over a month that continued after she had already explicitly expressed disinterest, arguably making it a clear-cut case of harassment, and b) because the people in question also did other things like shout at her and block her path while she was walking? I think it is ridiculous to make it a sexual offense, but I do think that consistent unwanted verbal attention w…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:50 PM
4

I miss the shit out of ribeye, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 03:58 PM
1

Most women can do this. Making it in the toilet is another issue. (Although in my personal experience men aren't so great at that, either.)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/15 09:16 PM
1

waves hands
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:04 PM
1

I've heard of them. I just thought it was generally regarded as misguided. It baffles me that anyone would look for stupidity in a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 06:03 PM
2

Human civilization won't last a thousandth of the time needed for such a thing We are discussing transhumanism, which does posit this kind of timescale.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 05:59 AM
1

There is also a good chance that sexual traits would eventually evolve out.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 04:40 AM
1

I am a Transhumanist, and I think such an implant would be a great idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/15 12:04 AM
1

I am female. I don't know exactly how it will happen, but I think it will start with the development and spread of technologies that take reproduction outside of the body (artificial wombs, artificial insemination). As a consequence of this becoming more widespread (which will naturally first require them to become affordable options for everyone) we will probably see a subsequent movement to end reproduction as we know it now. Ideally (from my perspective) this would involve the sterilization o…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:53 PM
-1

I personally think that advanced technology is going to do away with biological sex entirely. I also think this is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 11:02 PM
1

No, I am accidentally obtuse. Please explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 10:47 PM
1

Why would STEM not make you attractive to guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 09:28 PM
1

What can I say? You're a lucky man.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:32 PM
1

Neither would I. I'd probably bring it up earlier than in the car, too. If a guy said at the coffee shop, "Hey want to go back to my place and watch a movie?" If I liked him but didn't want to have sex that night, I would probably say, "Sure, but I don't want to have sex." That way if he actually just wanted sex, we could call it quits for the night, but if he actually wanted to watch the movie, he would know I was still up for that. If I just straight-up declined on the assumption he meant sex,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 05:31 PM
5

Not in the middle of dinner or anything, but if we were driving back to his apartment "for coffee" like in OP's example, that would probably be the best time to mention it, yeah. Not exactly "out of the blue" there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:29 PM
11

AWA18-25ALT
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:19 PM
2

We actually had Wilde's pickled head as a guest of honor at the Bimilennial Conference for the Wellbeing of Female Shapeshifters. Phenomenal man, really. Too bad he is a male and must therefore eventually be exsanguinated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:04 PM
2

But you said something about sarcasm?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:00 PM
0

I don't know what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 10:56 PM
1

Look at that bod tho. How much do you think he can lift?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 06:29 PM
1

Is it bad that I find Skeletor sexy? I'd totally jump his bones.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 06:21 PM
10

By having sex probably.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 11:10 PM
1

Depends on how you define feminine. I have a hard time with that myself. I was using TRP's definition of masculine to make my point, since TRP seems to want to have its cake and eat it too when it comes to discussing STEM fields. But I couldn't really give you my own solid definition of masculine either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:53 AM
1

Hardly (pun somewhat intended). What is considered "hard" and "soft" is not based in any kind of reality. Most dichotomies are cultural and can easily be pried apart or joined together by changing one's perspective. Hume said that "reason is the slave to the passions." The relationship between reason and emotion is heavily contended in philosophy. Some would say they work in opposition, others would say they work together, others yet would say they are co-dependent or even two ways of naming the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 07:49 AM
1

What point? This point? are blacks calling each other ni****s racist? This exhausted, spurious "point" that has literally nothing to do with the discussion we are allegedly having? Yeah, u mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 05:56 AM
1

Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize you wanted to have a discussion. I thought you just wanted to whine about how I'm somehow policing your thoughts like I care what you think. All I said is that I think the phrase OP asked about is a misogynistic statement. I did not come to discuss; I came to give my opinion in answer to OP's question. You need to back off and stop defending yourself against insults that were never uttered.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 05:44 AM
1

U mad?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 04:46 AM
3

Why is reason hard? Reason, like emotion, is a mental capacity, not a physical one, so I would categorize it as soft.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 11:46 PM
11

I would posit that it is not (wholly at least) hostility toward women in STEM fields but also the fact that women are less discouraged from pursuing non-STEM fields. Art is cool as shit, but being perceived as "unmanly" (see: u not going to make any money in that and u need be bredweiner) deters men away from it, leaving a disproportionate number of women. Two-sided coin.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:51 PM
5

Isn't the stereotypical male in STEM nerdy, aka unmasculine?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:48 PM
4

OP asked, I answered.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 08:08 AM
4

If you say the word "cum dumpster" in the woods and no one is around to hear it, is it still misogynistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:05 AM
2

Embarrassment is for betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 02:24 AM
4

I don't get
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 01:10 AM
9

I believe the question was "Is it misogynistic?" not "Will it break my bones?"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:49 AM
11

Let's not go crazy with the flattery now.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:03 AM
1

My sympathies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:30 PM
0

Is it fair for privileged BPers to criticize the "very disprivileged" among RPers? Absolutely not. Everybody knows that for every privilege point an insulter has on an insultee, God aborts a gay kitten.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:22 PM
7

They are comparing fatherhood to nothing more than a visit to the doctor office and shooting it in a cup. Do you like this term? Does it make your world a better place to pull it up as an excuse because you want to call a woman a "cum dumpster" so badly? They are both disgusting terms. Sure, defending one and condemning the other makes you a super mega hypocrite asshole, but defending both still makes you an asshole, if of a slightly lesser degree. You are really not winning me over here by offe…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:15 PM
5

Touche, you sly fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:11 PM
5

Calling a girl a cum-dumpster is the same as calling a man a sperm donor, it seems any term that is negative to a female is considered hate, which is why you can call a man a creep but you can't call a woman a bitch. Well then we shouldn't call men sperm donors (unless they actually are). Great solution, everybody happy, yes? why you can call a man a creep but you can't call a woman a bitch. Welp, that's a problem, yeah? Doesn't make the term "cum dumpster" any less misogynistic. I prefer the ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:09 PM
5

Check your non-dingbat privilege shitlord
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:04 PM
2

I'm guessing it has to do with when a woman just uses a guy to get pregnant with no intention of keeping him around. Not a literal sperm donor.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:02 PM
8

For starters, I would argue that none of those are worse terms because they are not dehumanizing to the same degree. Some men really are creeps. So are some women. Some men really are sperm donors. Still not sure what a neckbeard is, although I would not call a stereotype of women based on a certain hair/fashion style misogynistic in the same way as "cum dumpster". Nonetheless, that does not excuse throwing them around indiscriminately. Two wrongs don't make a right. The particular phrase in que…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:01 PM
5

Oops sorry forgot to check my non-dumpster privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 10:54 PM
1

As Oppose to comparing a to a sperm donor? Can you explain further? I have zero idea what you are getting at. It seems anytime a women is brought into negative light its called misogynistic, kind of like the violence against women myth. Maybe so, but that's not the question here. The question is if it's misogynistic to call a woman a "cum dumpster." Not exactly constructive criticism. Rather than focus on a evil person hitting a good person, they focus on a man hitting a woman. Again, a separate…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 10:53 PM
24

Maybe I'm just a total dingbat, but it seems pretty obvious to me that comparing a woman to a dumpster is pretty misogynistic, seeing as a dumpster is not only an object but a gross object. We don't even need to get to the "cum" part. But, then again, I'm probably just a dingbat. I don't really care what TRP does amongst themselves, but I should add that I don't support censorship anywhere. Stupid opinions should be allowed free reign that they might be mocked to maximum capacity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 09:53 PM
5

As opposed to rednecks?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 04:40 PM
2

Fair enough. Just keep poor Brad out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 04:00 PM
3

the cross polination between the 2 tribes Neckpills and redbeards?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 03:58 PM
1

He just needs to be fixed right? Depends. What is he selling? Also, we're talking about "fixed" in the stereotypical relationship sense, not in the cat sense, right? I would say: Weed = leave him the way he is Cocaine = fix him in the relationship sense Meth = fix him in the cat sense
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 06:18 AM
2

Don't you love/hate that you want to bang the drug dealer next door? Depends. Do I get free drugs?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 06:18 AM
8

No one said that. I think he is attractive. I said many women wouldn't just up and fuck him for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 10:28 PM
15

It has nothing to do with Brad Pitt's attractiveness. It has to do with the fact that he is married and a total stranger. People with low sex drives tend away from fucking people they don't know at all, no matter what they look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 06:30 PM
25

Why does everyone seem to think that every girl would just drop her pants for older married stranger Brad Pitt?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/15 05:48 PM
3

HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A PISSING CONTEST IF OUR DICKS CAN'T EVEN FIT INSIDE THE SUBREDDIT!?!?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:32 PM
7

Is there a name for this? Appeal to appeal?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:13 PM
18

Have you ever wondered if there was more to life, other than being really, really, ridiculously good looking?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:08 PM
6

You think that you're too cool for school, but I have a newsflash for you Walter Cronkite... you aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:07 PM
10

Just because you have chiseled abs and stunning features, it doesn't mean that you too can't not die in a freak gasoline fight accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 11:02 PM
3

I'd be interested to see the relative number of conversations where it didn't work.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 10:11 PM
6

"Give me your number or I'll rape you, teeheee" Joke or not, it's super gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 10:03 PM
4

Thatwasthejoke.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/15 08:05 PM
10

Awful.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:50 PM
1

I thought what ended up being the case here was that one of the speakers is autistic and had a hard time with loud noises. It's not that everyone at the conference is afraid of clapping - they were just making a note to people that a particular person would prefer something quieter and they were just trying to respect that without singling the person out. I don't think the fact that most modern feminists bend over backward to be extremely accommodating to certain people's self-professed triggers…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 10:06 PM
5

You dirty, dirty man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 09:51 PM
7

Nope, she's your problem now, sucker. Enjoy the ragged remnant of her maidenhead.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 09:41 PM
9

And a hymen check, of course, before he accepts her father's cattle.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/15 09:34 PM
1

Personally, no, as long as he is clean. I might have some questions about the specifics in this situation, but it would mainly be out of personal interest about what he has and hasn't tried. I would also want to ensure that he was decent to the prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 02:51 PM
-1

This is a pretty weak point. For starters, most headlines are clickbait anyway, and they tell us just as little about their actual content whether they are about Jews or men. Second of all, the structure of the article is misleading because it makes it seem like the sub-headlines are actual quotes from those authors, and they are not. Third of all, the history of anti-Semitism is not the same as the history of sexism (misandry OR misogyny). To try to make a point by saying, "What if they said it…
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:06 AM
4

Either stop hanging out with horrible people or stop complaining that people are horrible. Fucking hell, you can't have your cake and eat it to. Get the fuck over yourself. Seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/15 01:30 AM
3

I'm so, so sorry. Whatever happened to you, whatever you have been through, I am sorry, and I hope your faith is restored some day. That is all I have to say to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:12 PM
3

Gotcha.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:10 PM
0

Being wrong is being wrong. Other people being wrong doesn't make you less wrong. Your logic is bad, and you should feel bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:09 PM
3

This guy is trolling guys. Like legit old-school trolling. Leave it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:04 PM
3

occasionally make a sammich You were doing so well and then you had to go and give away the game like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:03 PM
5

I thought you red pill men pride yourselves in being masters of logic? Maybe you should win by logic instead of exasperating people into concession.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 11:01 PM
1

Who decided that it was acceptable to appropriate the term "rape" here? Rape is a very specific thing, and it sure as shit does not apply to what happens in a divorce. That is not to say it is not terrible, but it's not fucking "rape," so stop calling it that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 10:58 PM
1

If it's not possible for us to do it, don't complain that we don't. Yeah, you can never understand what I go through because you're not me, but that doesn't give me the right to call you an asshole for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 10:56 PM
2

I don't think I can change your view because your view seems wrapped up in a whole bunch of truly fucked-up assumptions that would probably be best worked through with a therapist, but here goes: women have no sympathy or empathy for men. I am a woman and probably two of my favorite people in the world are my father and younger brother. I routinely listen to my father rant about his problems for no reason other than that I know he needs to vent, so that's sympathy. My dad and I are also pretty r…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/15 10:54 PM
1

It is my firm belief that for every circlejerk, there is an equal and opposite circlejerk. I have seen a lot of ignorant comments both here and on TwoX, but I have also seen comments both places that gave me faith in humanity (i.e. women on TwoX fighting generalizations against men, men here fighting generalizations against women). If you don't want to wade through as much crap, /r/egalitarian is pretty nice, though.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:30 PM
1

It seems like a pretty dumb thing to lie about anonymously on the internet. Your dogma is talking, you should look to that.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:51 AM
6

I'm not sure telling women to "man up" would have the desired effect. I would prefer to demolish the idea that psychological durability is a man thing. Then men would not be afraid to seek help for serious problems and we can finally do away with this absurd babying of women with which modern feminists have essentially ruined feminism forever. These people don't need to man up (whatever that even means - testosterone injections maybe?) but to grow up.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 07:41 AM
2

Lol sexual reproduction is soon to be a thing of the past entirely. The singularity is near motherfuckers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/15 05:55 AM
8

The dry cunt of crusty age versus the soft impotent cock of wisdom...
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/15 12:32 AM
2

This right here. Rape in particular is a crime where way more onus tends to be placed on the victim than in other crimes. I think the backlash has gone way too far but I still see where it is coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 07:18 PM
2

No shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 07:16 PM
3

Nobody is talking about illegal. We are talking about immoral. Or in this case despicable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 07:15 PM
3

No hypothetical cell service.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 07:11 PM
0

Beat the shit out of you, take your car and leave you in the middle of nowhere. That will teach ya not to rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 07:11 PM
1

It helps everyone get it out of their system like a fight club.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 09:38 AM
4

Or maybe a cute little straw man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 09:36 AM
2

Right. RPWs think that all women should live the way they do, but it's not the way many women would choose to live. Therefore, RPWs are telling women how to live and denying their right to live their lives as they choose. Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 09:35 AM
6

They can live their lives however they want to. However, I think the red pill philosophy behind it is wrong, and it bugs me when people are wrong. Be submissive and traditional, fine, see if I care, it's your life, but do it because it's what you genuinely think is best for you, not due to your support of a philosophy that is insulting toward all women. When you start extending your philosophy to how I, as a woman, should live, I take that part personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 09:31 AM
18

I am a woman and I have had promiscuous friends tell me this honestly about their SOs before, so I would say, maybe not true in every case but no it's definitely not a total fiction. Personally, I would rather become a crazy old cat lady than ever settle for a guy I'm not into.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/15 09:24 AM
1

You are stating a lot of shit like fact that is not fact but one way of interpreting data. The IQ system is not universally considered a good objective measurement of anything. We are not such experts on genetics yet that you can simply state something with as many contributing factors as success in a certain field as "a function of genetics" in the godlike way you have here. You also ignored my point about there being a hierarchy to suspension of disbelief. I am going to take away that you are …
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:32 AM
1

Ok, yer not getting it. I'm not. Mostly means the more extraordinary you set the bar, the higher the percentage of men. Barely above normal? Say just one SD above norm? 66% men. 3 SD up? 97% men. The really extraordinary? Start counting 9s. What criteria are you using? I'm pretty sure there is no objective criteria for "extraordinariness," so forgive me if I take your data with a grain of salt. you still need suspension of disbelief to engage it. I guess I don't think that the idea of a capable …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 10:09 PM
1

Sorry I was conflating your post with a comment below where genders were explicitly stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:36 PM
1

But it's not the way fiction works. And "mostly" doesn't edge out the fact that extraordinary women exist and have stories worth being told and BEING MADE UP.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:30 PM
1

Gonna to leave it to the men to do? Then it's more likely that Link will continue to be a dude. But look at the success of Ms. Pacman!
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:11 PM
5

Also you might want to consider including some examples where a man is the victim/woman is the perpetrator.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:08 PM
4

If anyone thinks sleeping is consent, then "Yes means yes" is more necessary than I thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 09:06 PM
1

I'd like to see the case you make for this position. Saying anything is the rule is debatable because it is based on your observation, not a fact of the universe. to point out there are more noteworthy politicians, technologists, scientists and artists who are men than there are women? That is not shitting on women. But that's also not what he said. He said [only] "men do shit," which is a ridiculous generalization. There may be more men, but the number of women is still significant enough to wa…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 09:05 PM
0

5) No The last two cases are obviously cases of lying, so of course they are not rape, but it is an important corollary that regret is sometimes/often assumed to be the case (i.e. by police, in court) with no evidence that it actually is. For example, if he deliberately got her so drunk she could barely walk home let alone say yes or no. That's not regret, that's straight up date rape. My answers stand in cases of gender reversal. The real one I have questions about is where two people get shitf…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 08:53 PM
14

1) Yes 2) Yes 3) Yes 4) Yes They should all be felonies. I was actually expecting to see some gray cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 08:49 PM
1

Whether it is the rule is highly debatable (total bullshit in my opinion) but also not really the point here. Protagonists tend to be protagonists because they are extraordinary in some way, not because they are the rule. Nobody wants to read about the rule. The rule (the average person) is typically shitty and boring and generally all-around horrible to even talk with let alone watch for two hours or read for 700 pages. Additionally, the whole point of superheros is that they do what people can…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:35 PM
2

Not sure what making an argument has to do with being a man but Golda Meir Grace Hopper Margaret Thatcher Rosalind Franklin Sally Ride it goes on but you get my gist. I support a lot of the issues brought up here but shitting on women just because feminism irks you is pretty uncool.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 08:27 PM
1

That is a pretty unfair generalization.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:19 PM
1

I don't want to derail, but I can name quite a few female villains off the top of my head even with my limited knowledge of games/anime/nerd culture. Ultimecia (uses another woman to do her dirtywork) and Yunalesca from Final Fantasy (also maybe Jenova? idk) Dante and Eckhart from FMA (2003) Carmilla from Castlevania (subservient to male superior) Marianne from Code Geass, especially seeing as she was promoted as this awesome person the whole time and turns out to be straight-up awful Cersei fro…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 06:00 PM
2

The idea that there is no middle ground between pushover ("beta") and asshole ("alpha"). I'm sure some RPer will contradict me on this, but it always seems that niceness is conflated with spinelessness. It is totally possible to be decent without being spineless and to be assertive without being an asshole, and women, being people, like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/15 03:44 PM
1

I don't think anyone should be forced into parenthood. I am also a socialist and in favor of mandatory opt-out birth control, so make of that what you will.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:29 AM
2

What at all does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:25 AM
2

Pouty? Absolutely not. Playful? Yes, but this usually involves banter/exchanging barbs. I was raised by New Yorkers and enjoy a good "reading." NOTE: This is not the same as crapping on each other. I would not crap on an SO and I do not enjoy being crapped on. It is all the difference between an arm wrestle and punching someone in the face.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 11:37 PM
0

I am confused by the relevance of the books.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 11:35 PM
2

I think the point is that they are going about cultivating attraction all wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 11:35 PM
1

If you define "late" as 18-25, I am inclined to believe it. I think there is probably a bell-curve at work here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 11:27 PM
1

In many ways, but I would argue this is more a product of old-school gender roles than feminism. The only one I might blame on feminism is the rape witch-hunt going on on college campuses right now. However, even that is tainted with old-school gender roles - the idea that women fall naturally into the victim role. This should be staunchly opposed by feminism but isn't because the movement has been corrupted by selfish idiots who don't know what they are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 02:24 AM
1

No fucking way.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/15 02:17 AM
1

Yes, and it is a damn shame because there is a lot to be said for both.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:21 AM
1

Butthurt is not sensitivity. It is a particular kind of sensitivity that involves oozing amounts of self-pity and blaming others, as well as twisting words and the like. There is a vast difference between sensitivity and over/hypersensitivity. The latter is a bad trait, period. It has nothing to do with gender. I wouldn't want to be just friends with a hypersensitive person any more than I would want to sleep with one. It can only lead to stress. I'm going to try to stop being combative here for…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:18 AM
1

Butthurt is an unattractive trait in anyone. It has nothing to do with masculinity and everything to do with emotional immaturity, which is - yes - unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:12 AM
1

you concede yet another point to TRP: women, including you apparently, want a tough, stoic, masculine man, and see sensitivity as a malus. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU GETTING THIS!?!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:11 AM
1

"Repulsive seeping asshole." I stand by this. I'd say you're there already. I stand by this. there is no "pussy wave." What the fuck is a pussy wave?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:05 AM
1

Oh, butthurt now I see. No that was a response to your assumption that women will suddenly adore you if you act like an ass. Which is ridiculous by the way, but I already said that, so. I don't know how many partners you've had, but clearly you want more, and that was what I was referring to. And, yeah, there is no pussy wave because that is a stupid metaphor I made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:04 AM
1

I don't speak for all women by any stretch, but I at least speak for one more than you do. Oooooh I bet that's how you interpreted that. No, pal. I don't know your partner count, and frankly I don't care. No matter how many women you fuck - whether it's zero or a million - you will never, ever speak for a single one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:02 AM
2

you have resorted to name calling and insulting me based on partner count. Where did I do that? Are you illiterate, too?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 02:00 AM
1

Woah, seems like I touched a nerve lol. The one that triggers my gag reflex. women like Stop right there. Last I checked I am a woman and you're not, so I'd advise you stop telling me what women like. I don't speak for all women by any stretch, but I at least speak for one more than you do. If girls liked intelligent, soft spoken men, TRP's front page would be covered with discussions of everything from Heidegger to Linear Algebra This would also be the case is TRP weren't full of deluded idiots…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 01:55 AM
2

Uh, you do realize that "you" was a metonym for the group you represent (progressive feminists), right? I do not represent anyone but myself. I am not a "repulsive seeping asshole" yet, but I hope to become one if it will help me romantically. From that sentence, I'd say you're there already. Don't worry, babe, I'm sure the pussy wave will come to drown you soon enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 01:50 AM
2

I have never written for either of those sites. Not pretending anything. I will say that there is a difference between genuine nice guys (like the one I am seeing now and am attracted to) and fake nice guys who feel entitled to fuck women just for being nice (see: not really all that nice). But by all means continue to wallow in your own bullshit if it makes you feel better about being a repulsive seeping asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 01:42 AM
1

Wow you know me so well.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 01:27 AM
2

Um, thanks I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:37 PM
2

O I am slain!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:33 PM
5

So clever. Now I see why you consider yourself such a catch.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:26 PM
2

Good parenting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:08 PM
4

I just want to point out that your ridiculous flare metaphor undermines itself. Have you ever gone dumpster diving? You can find some really good shit. And I promise we don't want to fuck you either. Now stand down.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:05 PM
2

This uses the pseudoscientific term "Aryan" in the first sentence so I stopped reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 10:03 PM
2

Paul McCartney?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 09:58 PM
2

Do you think it's wrong to learn what kind of conversations and topics and things make dates go well and make the girl more attracted to you? Not wrong at all. But I also think considerateness is a factor here. Talking at someone about shit they clearly don't care about is a bad way to build a relationship, romantic or otherwise. If you have common interests, by all means focus on those. It's just social tact. But don't pretend you care about shit you don't really care about for someone else's s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 05:07 PM
2

I suppose what I am talking about is trying to figure out what people want to hear so you can say it to them. Working on looking people in the eye and having a firm handshake isn't a dishonest business trick even if you're consciously doing it so people respond to you better. Sure. But let's talk about the world of business versus the world of dating. When I am in a job interview, my goal is to get a well-paying job so I can make a living. It is a means to an end. I am not purporting to have an …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:35 PM
5

Alternately, we want the not-nice ones to just stay the fuck away.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 04:00 PM
2

Not sure what world you live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:59 PM
3

It is strange, why do people resent TRP, and not other sub reddits devoted to racism, rape, and murder? It is because people don't actually care when other people suffer, they care when they personally are hurt (empathy is a form of personal pain caused by witnessing the suffering of someone else. If no personal pain occurred, there would be no empathy). TRP hurts many people on a personal level by attacking the most ego-sensitive quality a person has: their sexual self esteem. Don't flatter you…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 03:55 PM
3

That sounds like a combination of metaphilosophy and gender studies. But yeah Gilligan touches on that in ethics and I imagine there are a lot of places you can find similar works in other areas of philosophy. I would say the absence of discussion on these topics is largely due to analytic philosophy still being overwhelmingly male. What is the gender ratio like in your program?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 08:40 PM
3

Can you define this? I majored in analytic philosophy in college, and I would say most people I studied with considered themselves feminists (fairly rare in AP from what I've heard), but I don't know if I would consider anything in particular that I studied explicitly feminist. Are you referring to stuff like Gilligan's ethics of care and whatnot?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 06:01 PM
8

Again nothing remotely close to what is said in the title. Just making fun of the double standard that ffm is cool but fmm is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 04:51 AM
1

Anything that purports what "real men" do is ludicrous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 04:47 AM
4

Sorry but that does not look to me like anyone in that thresd is saying anything remotely close to the title of this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/15 04:44 AM
1

Schopenhauer was just a misogynist and certainly not a prototype. His misogyny stemmed from abuse by his mother, who was a pretty shitty person. Of all of his ideas, the thought that this is the one people would take inspiration from is nauseating.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 11:22 PM
1

No. If she agreed to a monogamous relationship, she should honor that. If she wants to start sexually exploring and the husband isn't down, she should weigh the value of the marriage against the importance of sexual exploration to her. If the latter is more important, it may be a sign that the couple is sexually incompatible and should break up. She has no right to coerce the husband into doing something he isn't comfortable with, but she does have the right to leave him if the arrangement is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 11:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter