TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlondAnorexicSkank Archive

View 1 post and 111 comments by BlondAnorexicSkank on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Does it even matter if a shooter is subscribed to mensrights? It will happen eventually. There are insane people on every side of every issue.
/r/MensRights05/11/18 06:38 AM
108

How can you be okay with your father being murdered?
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:03 AM
6

But I see /s immediately so it is not fun at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:02 PM
2

This shit won't be over until every male feminist is accused of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights07/10/18 11:55 PM
18

The funniest thing is that the radfems are also easier to convince that men can be victims of sexual assault than the average person.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:31 PM
5

Nope, just crickets.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 02:05 PM
4

*majority support
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:32 PM
7

Honestly it's like the polar opposite of incels since their whole thing is blaming the world for their celibacy.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 09:48 PM
7

That's a great strategy for getting yourself fired from your job.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 07:18 PM
2

Apparently nobody could tell that I was making a joke.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:20 PM
-14

I think both groups are right. This murderer was both a man and an illegal immigrant. If one or both of those things were kept away from the victim, then this tragedy would not have happened. Clearly we need to build a wall and make the men pay for it. And build and maintain it.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:26 AM
11

Probably isn't counting step dads and is assuming divorces that have the mother with the kids most of the time are kids being raised by "single mothers."
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:28 AM
7

Because it has the desired effect more often than it should.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:54 PM
13

They won't.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:53 PM
11

Sure, but if you call them incels people are going to assume they are men, so using reverse is helpful. The same way reverse harem gets the idea across better and helps me find what I need. I mean...
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:26 AM
7

Alright well I'm not going to pretend that you're being honest at all. This place has been hated for being misogynistic and white supremacist for forever. And since it isn't super ban happy you could always see some of those viewpoints here and most often heavily downvoted. But I'm sure you've cared about the health of this community for a long time and took pains to protect it from the disease of far right propaganda because you care so much about that not overtaking a sub with noble goals that…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 03:48 AM
8

Can you people please stop coming up into these spaces to harass "right wingers" ? This place only exists because we basically are all former feminists. Are some people right wing now or started that way? Sure, but this space only exists because people on the left (like me) woke up to the fucking insanity surrounding us. Every aspect of my existence was getting pathologized and if anything I did or felt didn't mesh well with the most radical feminist narrative then I was part of the problem. You…
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:48 AM
1

Are you serious?
/r/MensRights23/07/18 01:57 AM
1

I don't understand how these motherfuckers haven't figured out that 3rd parties don't consent to participating in your exhibitionism. It's only a matter of time before feminism attacks stuff like this and it kills one of the only things that tricks normies into thinking feminism has anything to do with liberation.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 02:34 PM
2

Knowing that a group is more likely to engage in a certain behavior doesn't require that we know why they engage in it. We just know that they are making the concious choice to engage in said behavior. So saying black people are naturally violent is just unproductive racism whereas saying black people engage in more violence and are thus more often jailed for said violent offences is true and useful information.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 12:45 AM
1

So why did you choose to participate in this thread if you don't care about the subject? You very clearly care.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:59 PM
1

Bro you wouldn't be saying anything if you weren't insecure about it. You very clearly care.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 05:15 AM
1

? Do you disagree?
/r/MensRights13/07/18 12:46 AM
5

Sorry but Takei is a hypocrite on his anti sexism stance and that is what the callout is about. Not that he is self hating or whatever. We aren't leaning on misandry to be the reason he is full of shit. He's a hypocritical douchebag and he also is a dick to other men. That does not make him self hating the way a misogynist women is implied to be. Most feminists use the misogyny accusation as the crux of the argument. It doesn't matter what your opinion is, I don't have to respond to it in kind b…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:45 PM
10

The thing I think you fail to understand is that we aren't discrediting men who disagree with us by calling them internalized misandrists whereas feminists use that term to discredit wrongthinking women. But I don't even think that they are actual misandrists for the most part. Most of them aren't really self hating enough for the label to make sense. They hate all other men and think that they alone are the good man.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 07:23 PM
3

I do think that not speaking up is a selfish kind of cowardice. All it does is guarantee that other men will suffer and that eventually you too will join them.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:50 PM
6

That's always the case. Why do you think characters like wormtail resonate so much? Starving for validation, but lacking all the willpower to be the one in charge, they leave everyone who sees them with a sense of disgust.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:38 PM
47

The thing is lots of gay men think that male bashing isn't targeting them. Same with a lot of progressive white men. They completely believe shitting on "bros" or "white guys" is targeting everyone but them and their friends. I believe it's part of a really common problem with men where they think they are special and not like the other men. They don't think of themselves as part of a collective of men, they see themselves as individuals. This isn't a problem inherently, but when people are shov…
/r/MensRights12/07/18 06:34 PM
13

If you're in a crowd of sjws then you'll see a marked increase in social capital. You'll also get less shit from everybody around you if you're just in a lefty area. Now you'll have a whole new host of new issues, but if you were a bottom tier man, then your increased difficulties with dating etc. won't even seem like noticeable changes since you probably had no success in those areas anyways. Especially dating. So you can help yourself with a few social issues and rise up a bit and hurt yoursel…
/r/MensRights24/06/18 07:47 AM
1

Idk how those bitches walk if they don't let it cool off.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 07:36 AM
1

That's not the point
/r/MensRights24/06/18 05:11 AM
1

Sure, but it's just weird because you can't choose to have a big dick, but you can choose to have a lot of tinder hookups.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:57 AM
3

But quite literally women who are more sexually active are tighter because they work it out more. Assuming they give themselves some days of recovery time of course.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:32 AM
11

But there's no choice or moral question with relation to dick size.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:21 AM
2

That's what I did do...
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:13 AM
2

But we should be able to figure out breast size from when they are clothed. A 10" dick can be very well hidden.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:06 AM
1

Well I didn't give her her name or her Italian background
/r/MensRights24/06/18 12:04 AM
9

I have the annoying trait where I have an insatiable urge to nitpick arguments so lots of people end up thinking I'm a contrarian or a troll, but I'm just trying to help.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:39 PM
45

Honestly it would be more like talking about the labia or clitoris size since theres no visible aspect to tightness. And you can actually change how tight you are by working on it with exercise.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:13 PM
1

Italian. Grande like a coffee at Starbucks.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 09:09 PM
3

Definitely still illegal.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:38 AM
12

She really looks like she is developmentally disabled. Her face is so indicative of some kind of retardation. I don't say that about just anybody. Like she has some genetic issue.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:57 PM
9

Just about everyone in this community is a former feminist but many of us arrived here before knowing about MRA and without this film. The amount of isolation and fear you feel when you notice these issues on your own but aren't sure it's okay to address them or think about them because of how the people around you will react is overwhelming. I hope you don't lose any friends. I've simply chosen to not talk about anything with too much depth with most anybody because I can feel safe online. Soci…
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:27 PM
8

Because the dude you're talking to is an idiot
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:20 PM
4

Better writing. She made mean girls after all.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 09:06 AM
12

I think we should raise the pay for police and also raise their liabilities and responsibilities if they fuck up majorly. Tired of seeing them do obvious abuses and getting saved. Too much incompetence and shit behavior is excused by their ranks.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 07:57 AM
1

That's kind of a funny idea. I think drafts are the best way for us to avoid war or be more ethical to ourselves and others when we engage in it. There wasn't anywhere near the outrage for Iraq as there was for Vietnam.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 10:13 PM
1

I like want to report this comment, but maybe that's not the right way to learn you that the American way is the only one.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:28 AM
1

Explain please. No idea what you mean.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:18 PM
4

Even if you're the most anti male bigot in existence you should be taking my position out of sheer pragmatism.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:21 AM
4

This statistic is terrifying. Anyone who is hoping to maintain peace in their country should act quickly and figure out how to curb this inequality. Disenfranchised men are the most threatening group to any society and if the percentage of them grows too high then violent revolution is inevitable.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 03:48 AM
1

Yeah I agree. It's frustrating how we pretend women have no agency.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:25 PM
0

Maybe the answer is never date any women and you'll never have this problem. Definitely seems like the superior solution.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:51 PM
2

I'm not saying they are victims of anything. Just that if I was working anywhere doing anything I wouldn't proposition anyone there. Not that it's wrong to date a coworker or whatever, but the right place to do that is at a party or over drinks after there's flirtation going on. Not an awkward request out of the blue.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:50 PM
-4

Have her take a supplement. You'll probably need viagra at that point anyways.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 07:48 PM
2

Yeah. It should have been something that nobody gave much of a shit about. It's nowhere near anything Weinstein or countless others engaged in.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:20 PM
5

I didn't say he should be blacklisted, I just said it was inappropriate. I would never do something like that. I would never proposition coworkers who were below me and could think maybe their careers would improve by entertaining my fetish. It's idiotic and they aren't victims of anything, but it is not behavior that I would do because I think it is wrong to proposition people in that context.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:11 PM
-2

Just make sure that you're good at sex and the person you're with has a high sex drive. If having sex with you ever feels like a chore, then it won't end well.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:25 PM
6

It's inappropriate because he was they were in a business relationship and was exacerbated by him being their apparent superior. But it's definitely not illegal.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:15 PM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 02:49 PM
2

On an individual level women should be doing what I am saying. As a greater trend, you're absolutely right. This is what I'd call a shortcoming of being in a system (in this case for dating) that functions like a free market. Sometimes what is good for you is a bad idea if everyone does it.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 02:18 PM
8

Well yeah because it's become an expectation and a requirement for a woman to have a career. Even if her #1 goal is to get married and have kids the smartest way to go about doing that is to go to college, get a decent job, then find a guy on a good path if she didn't already find one in school. If she doesn't have those things, she just looks like a leech to any reasonable guy and is avoided by most everyone.
/r/MensRights25/03/18 07:28 AM
1

I think the only problem is I don't know of any data that would indicate that the level of threat from a man or woman would be the same. Assuming all criminal background is equal.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:54 AM
2

The point is that the man is probably more capable of violence than the woman who is equally guilty. I just find it somewhat difficult to argue against if they genuinely believe the man to be more dangerous. We put down animals that are more capable of violence all the time, so the logic they are using isn't just made up. I'm also not certain if women with the same record as a man are equally likely to continue criminal behavior after being released. So that might be a good stat for us to know. …
/r/MensRights16/03/18 04:46 AM
2

So how do we respond when feminists say that men should have higher incarceration rates and higher sentencing since they are more dangerous?
/r/MensRights15/03/18 07:17 PM
0

All things considered, this is pretty harmless.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:53 PM
7

Does carrying things around for a few hours and just saying, "yeah that looks great" sound appealing to you? This isn't shopping.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:09 PM
189

Women have no power any time it's convenient for them not to.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 02:48 PM
2

Yeah its just a coincidence that people that believe in different ideas behave in different ways.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 11:25 PM
2

You're a disingenuous guy. Good job ignoring everything I'm saying. Hope you love it when you get told that you're perpetuating toxic masculinity and the horde turns on you. I certainly won't be there to defend you.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:20 AM
2

Oh sorry I just figured you running interference for them by defending the use of the term toxic masculinity kind of implied that you never noticed them abusing this term for their own ends. It reminds me of people arguing that Islam is peaceful while completely ignoring the thousands of jihadis inspired by scripture. Sure, it's supposed to be peaceful, but there's a fucking elephant in the room here. The same is true for your toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 08:11 AM
2

This guy is just living under a rock. How do you trick yourself into thinking that feminists have done no wrong? Even most normal apolitical people see that at least some feminists are fucking lunatics. They don't pay enough attention to see obvious tactics like redefining words or creating new words to facilitate attacking normal things normal people do, but they at least are somewhat skeptical. This guy is just the most amazing useful idiot I've seen.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:07 AM
2

When did you last beat your wife?
/r/MensRights11/03/18 07:02 AM
2

I'm going to assume you're arguing in good faith, so I'm going to let you know that the people who believe masculinity is toxic understand that saying this outright makes people not receptive to their message. If they frame it in a way that sounds like they are trying to help men by preventing behaviors that hurt them, then people will be much more receptive to that message. From there they can argue against all kinds of things that are normal or positive or neutral and claim that they are in th…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 06:23 AM
3

I think it's easy to be feel attacked when behaviors that I engage in personally that I know have been beneficial to me or others have been called "toxic." It's also pretty telling that toxic femininity isn't discussed at all. Pretty clearly signals that women aren't causing any problems in society while men clearly are to blame. You can go on all day that there are harmful behaviors that men and boys are encouraged to engage in and there are, but the use of the term toxic masculinity simply poi…
/r/MensRights11/03/18 05:23 AM
3

No, I'm saying that the term is ambiguous and intentionally so for the purpose of shifting the blame of social ills on "masculine culture." I've never seen anyone who brings up "toxic masculinity" even attempt to look at other factors to explain what leads to a negative behavior. It's quasi relgious bullshit and you buying into it is either you enabling disenguous assholes into further harming men, or you're complicit in it for reasons that I can't figure out since nobody gains from this except …
/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:38 AM
11

Seeing normalization of feminist terms on this sub worries me.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:55 AM
7

How is this the most upvoted comment here? The whole notion of toxic masculinity is an attempt to vilify and pathologize specific behaviors and attribute them to men and masculinity. It's a thinly veiled attempt to conflate masculinity with all things evil. Seeing this comment get such a good response makes me think this subreddit has been fully co-opted by feminists.
/r/MensRights11/03/18 12:40 AM
4

Do women not exist in mgtow land? I'm sure some lady could claim that you're the father even if you never slept with her.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 04:43 AM
4

It's just too scary to go support unpopular political movements publicly. Too many of us have too much to lose.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 05:37 AM
1

Maybe add a moderator or two and add some rules to limit reposts or rehashing the same points. They should also push for more discussion threads, more current threads, and definitely more activism opportunities.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 04:36 AM
-1

Well at least you got something out of it.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:44 AM
-5

Yeah, I am just disappointed about what gets upvoted here. Way too much low effort garbage and very few good discussion threads. It makes it so sticking around feels like a waste of time because you'll see the same shit over and over and over. That's probably why this community isn't all that active compared to the number of subs.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 03:20 AM
-2

Nah the top comment should be: why is this same fucking thing getting upvoted when I've seen this story a billion times already? Most annoying thing about this community is the need to not even add new discussion just upvote basically the same ideas and stories that have been around since this sub began.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 02:07 AM
3

No, they're the enemy.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:36 AM
1

A couple points of criticism: Please format your text it's all in one giant mass making it much harder to read. Also you're using more charged language than necessary. It's good to express yourself but it's better to not come off as anti woman when you speak. Outreach is important, so if you want to convince people that this movement matters or you have your own goals to better the lives of men, then it would be wise to avoid saying "psycho bitch". Finally, do try to not blame women for the ills…
/r/MensRights21/02/18 12:51 AM
17

It don't fit the narrative therefore it ain't a story.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:49 PM
29

I just think using the /s is embarassing. Shows that your audience is too dumb to get a joke or you're too bad at writing it for it to be understood.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:25 PM
1

That writing is so terrible I stopped at the second sentence. And it seems like she is improving. This cause is a little bit less ridiculous than A/C so good for her.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:23 PM
1

Brett and his wife Heather cover several topics we are all too familiar with and expand on them from their perspective as evolutionary biologists. Lots of good questions from Joe and is well worth watching the whole way through. Hope you all enjoy it as much as I did.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 11:19 PM
2

Very good.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:35 AM
3

Would this outlaw the practice for all ages or just for children who can't consent? I would be against making the practice illegal to consenting adults for the same reason I would be against plastic surgery bans.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 07:40 AM
0

K go back to your cave in isolation where you only learn about life from your personal experience. Learning anything from fiction is not allowed.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:14 PM
0

You're being very dishonest and I got annoyed. There's no way you could believe that reading/listening/watching stories fictional or nonfictional have no value in helping people build a template for their lives. If you genuinely can't think of a single fictional or nonfictional character who inspired you then I don't think you have basic cognitive function.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 09:47 PM
0

You're actually retarded.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 04:02 PM
0

Unless you try to copy your father or some other man you spend a load of time around, stories are needed so you can have some template to build your life around. Whether it's fiction or history doesn't matter much.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 03:02 AM
1

Uh... do you think positive behaviors just pop out of nowhere? Values have to be learned somehow and it's much nicer to get them from stories and teachings than it is to figure them out the hard way. Also I think it's a general good idea to provide positive role models and templates for life to children. It is important to provide many different templates so that a child can have more opportunity to see a path forward that he can be inspired by. It's a cultural failing to have only one model for…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 08:22 PM
19

They're just tired of stupid dishonest thinkpieces about why whatever they are doing in their lives is wrong and immoral. Besides that I don't know a single sub that doesn't go after the low hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 03:34 AM
9

It's unlikely the guy down voting you was a jew considering the massive amount of people who are circumcised and not jewish and that jews are a tiny minority. I'd suggest not jumping to that conclusion because it makes you and everyone who upvoted look anti semitic. I'd really like to not give people evidence to support the false claim that the mrm is right wing reactionaries.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:44 PM
7

That's rape! How could you even compare the two?!?!?! I knew this place was nothing but rape apologists.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 09:39 AM
0

This statement kinda made me cringe. I'm sorry guys, but I don't think this movement will ever be mainstream when the vast majority of us will never come out to anyone we know as supporters. I think the best strategy for our success is to just focus on issues and policies. I could be wrong. We could have a well loved female celebrity come out as an MRA. I highly doubt that would happen, but it would be a game changer.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 11:18 AM
4

He is right though. Maybe most MRAs are left leaning, I don't know for sure, but majority of men lean right. Looks bad to downvote a guy who is correctly interpreting statistics.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 12:28 AM
2

Rejecting people makes you look good while giving in does not. Being forced, however, makes you a martyr.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 08:08 AM
8

Hey dude. Brett Weinstein and Jordan Peterson agree his work in that memo isn't very controversial. They are both well regarded and often cited academics. Why the fuck should anyone believe you over them? You don't even explain anything you just link to some wikipedia hoping I draw the right conclusions. What a joke.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:54 AM
41

That's actually a good idea. Push it.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:16 AM
3

I think it's a terrible thing to resent someone for not finding solutions to problems they identify.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:33 AM
3

I think you're too idealistic in your belief of the eventual feminist utopia to see the countless problems with that utopia and the path to achieve it. There is no perfect society and ignoring or making excuses for the behavior of people who have the same utopian goals as you do only hurts your end goal of your perfect society. Feminists have always been doing doing and saying awful things but many excuse their actions because they have such good intention with their end goal. If you ignore sche…
/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:15 PM
1

I wish they could realize that restricting rights for one sex is hypocritical and downright evil if you're convinced you're fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:07 AM
1

Well I don't see how you're going to do that. If a guy doesn't have a problem it's hard to convince him to change the law to secure rights for other men since he's not likely to have sympathy for their situation. Only way this could get a quick fix is if most women were abusing men's lack of paternal rights.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 03:05 AM
4

I wish we would ignore anything about abortion it makes really stupid people misunderstand the argument and gives them ammo to continue to ignore the point. Men can't just give up the child with safe haven laws. Men can't hide a pregnancy then get the state to go after the mother for child support. Please ignore any point about abortion rights and just hammer on these points and unless the person you're talking to hates men and believes 18 years indentured servitude is a good consequence for unw…
/r/MensRights28/11/16 07:54 PM
1

What kind of savage does that shit? Let me break my damn chocolate bits you jerk
/r/MensRights19/11/16 04:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter