TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BlueRabbit21 Archive

View 2 posts and 120 comments by BlueRabbit21 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Doesn't the average 22yo man also make more money than the average 22yo woman? Isn't that just going to cancel that out? Women can live without tampons, razors and make-up. This doesn't mean that the majority of women don't invest in it, they do. You're arguing about what should be, not about what is. Women's spending is probably more expensive than that of men's, when factoring other things like make-up which the majority wear. Yes it is not a necessity, but that isn't the point. The point is w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 08:33 PM
1

And again, male and female students exist in vastly different economic realities. Oh please, as if them being female is suddenly going to make them richer. This just isn't true. Look at the real world, have a walk outside, what kind of a student has access to more money out of the sheer fact that she's a female. It just isn't true. You're arguing this so that you have something to argue with, none of this can be backed up. Edit: Unless you can prove that female student live in "vastly different …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 06:54 PM
1

Male rates with female observer were higher than the entirety of female sample. It is higher, but not for the right reasons. It's higher than the entirety of the female sample because they're willing to spend to impress women. How is this supposed to support your view? You highlight it, as if it's something that's supposed to be in favour of your view.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 06:11 PM
1

Bold conclusion for observable differences within one "sigma": I've found the full text of the study number 168, "Showing Off in Humans"... This piece of research doesn't do much in your favour; I just quickly researched it, let's quote what it says: "...Our results show that men contribute more to charity when observed by a member of the opposite sex than by a member of the same sex or no observer. Conversely, female charity donations did not significantly vary across the three observer conditi…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 05:30 PM
1

If men are made to pay it, it's not really altruistic now, is it? I like how you focus on one part only, trying to jab at the income one. Have you not read the part where I quoted about an experimental study where women were more likely to help someone? It is not just one study that agrees with how women are more altruistic. There are many different studies, and they were conducted in different environments (experimental, economical, prosocial behaviour etc), and they agreed with women being mor…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 03:42 PM
1

Why would a society consider you as worthless?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 08:39 PM
1

Not killing their own children - women take that honor. I'm afraid you're wrong about that. The Bureau of Justice Statistics mentions that: "...Most of the children killed are male and most of the offenders are male..." It goes into details about it: 31% are killed by their fathers 29% were killed by their mothers 23% were killed by male acquaintances 7% were killed by other relatives 3% were killed by strangers
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 08:29 PM
1

"Close to equal percentages" can easily translate into 10-20 percent difference of likeliness. The stats show what the percentages are between men and women of those who donated blood. It does not show why it is the way it is, to argue that this is because men are more altruistic is an assumption. The studies I quoted are different, because it shows that not only are women more likely to help but it mentions why; it mentions how women tend to be more altruistic. Yours is based on "so I guess tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 08:11 PM
1

The only Western nations where women slightly outperform men are Estonia, New Zealand, and Portugal. I am not talking about outperformance, but close to equal percentages. In most of the western societies, it is approximately equal. Give me some of your money, and I'll gladly show you how generous I can be with money that I haven't earned. As a group, US women pay 1.45 times less into social security system than men. Again, where is the proof that when women give charity, they do so using their …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 08:30 PM
3

Excuse me, but I have only this much time to address your biases and things you use to support them. This is where your ignorance will stem from: Blood donors: ignored. Right. So we're just going to ignore how, in the west, the numbers are pretty close to being equal, and sometimes go in the opposite direction with women giving more. I wonder whether this is something that has to do with it being a 3rd world country, or a country with an unequal treatment of women? The fact that the money women …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 04:41 PM
3

I love how you are partly right about this, one of them virtue signals with their money, but it isn't women: "...Females give more of their time and money to charities (for a review, see Einolf, 2011)..." It continues: "...However, in terms of amount donated per person, males give higher amounts than females (Piper and Schnepf, 2008..." But: "...although, this may be due to higher incomes, on average, for males, or due to the fact that males are more likely to display their resources as a mating…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 03:38 PM
1

pure opinion No it is not. There are general things that communities at large, agree with, like how murdering is generally perceived as immoral all over the world - in the same way, helping people or giving to others is seen as a trait that morally superior people have. Here I'm going to include some of what the article says: "...In a three-party Ultimatum Game...females are more likely to offer an equal three-way split then males (Guth et al., 2007). This suggests that female behavior in econom…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 03:35 PM
8

"...females are more likely to help in low-risk–low-physical-strength (LRLS) situations, such as to look after neighbor’s pet or give clothes to charity (Erdle et al., 1992). Males, on the other hand, tended to help more in high-risk–high-physical-strength (HRHS) situations (e.g. helping to push a car, giving a stranger a lift in a car)..." I.e. women help only when it doesn't cost them much, when it doesn't put their life and health at risk, when the required sacrifices are seen by them as affo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 03:29 PM
1

This is not a study. This is a collection of studies. Give the article a read, there is more than 30 studies that all agree that women are more empathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 10:46 AM
2

There is a difference between doing something because it is your job, and doing it because you want to help. With the latter clearly being a more moral person. This is from the link, which you clearly did not read: "... While males and females tend to be prosocial when given hypothetical situations, their reasoning differed: Females’ decisions seemed more empathy-related and they appeared happier about their decision compared to men..." It then talks about men and their intentions: "...In additi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 10:22 AM
7

People have motives behind every action they person. Some people have selfish, self validation motives And look what the studies say: "... While males and females tend to be prosocial when given hypothetical situations, their reasoning differed: Females’ decisions seemed more empathy-related and they appeared happier about their decision compared to men..." So this may have you thinking: well what motivates men, then? The article continues by saying: "...In addition, males’ decisions on giving w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 10:13 AM
5

I know, which is why you are tripping over my example. From your link, guess your less on the cognitive side. I honestly don't understand how this is supposed to be an attack on my statement. Women are more moral and better people. None of what you've written above challenges that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:57 AM
3

I am not talking about physical attributes, my statement doesn't talk about that in the slightest. This is projection at it's finest. It clearly talks about betterness in terms of moral values, and because women are more likely to want to help - whether that is emotionally, physically or in other ways - they are therefore "better" and more "moral" people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:48 AM
7

? So you agree that being good is a feminine trait?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:38 AM
5

Ah, a fall back to the extremes. All women can't be wonderful unless nearly all men are EVIL RAPING MURDERERS! Forget extremes, the studies in that article are what I'm citing for support for what I initially wrote. This is the meta-analysis I was talking about. And it all agrees with me. No extremes, just your average men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:29 AM
2

Those who are more willing to help are generally seen as better/more moral human beings. You are seriously projecting if you think that this isn't what is considered a good person. You can go down the "but that's not what I consider a good person, therefore you're wrong", but by most people's idea of a good person, this is what it is. Also, you have to take into account that the majority of crimes - especially the really fucked up ones like pedophilia and murder are nearly always committed by me…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:27 AM
7

Oh please. Read all of this, and then get back to me. Edit: it is not some sort of coincidence that nearly every pedophile is a male, that nearly every killer is a male, that nearly every terrible person that would do the most horrific shit you can think of - is a male. There is a reason for why men tend to be more terrible.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:17 AM
0

I am not discussing the causes of lack of empathy in men. I am merely making the statement that they are not as good people, as women are. You are going off on a tangent.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:15 AM
9

"...Females give more of their time and money to charities (for a review, see Einolf, 2011)..." . "...However, in terms of amount donated per person, males give higher amounts than females (Piper and Schnepf, 2008..." But then, this gets explained further: "...although, this may be due to higher incomes, on average, for males, or due to the fact that males are more likely to display their resources as a mating signal (e.g., Iredale et al., 2008)..." Men are such lovely people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:04 AM
8

Men will never be good at being women And will also never be as moral as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 09:01 AM
1

Yes. Studies have shown this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 08:24 AM
1

Suppose that what you are saying is all true, how is this any different from men like yourself and the rest of RP whom - when they're in their 40's - lust after 20 somethings, but cannot get them and therefore settle with women their own age? Isn't it the equivalent of what the women are supposedly doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 08:19 AM
3

AMALT
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 08:13 AM
10

I came across a meta-analysis that looked into detail about empathy and gender (we all know who is more empathetic) and it had proven time and time again that women were more likely to help someone who was hurt - whether physically or emotionally. Women were more likely to give to charity, were more likely to volunteer, were more likely to pretty much be a good human being all around. When the women did good, they did so because they genuinely wanted to, and it made them feel happy to help anoth…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 07:47 AM
0

I'm quite thankful that my mother handed me the Red Pill about men and their sexual/predatory ways, before I even started puberty. I had nothing to expect from men, and I still don't expect much from them; as they are (nearly) all selfish, impulsive and aggressive. AMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 07:38 AM
1

In all honesty, this is absolutely great and lovely to hear - but the vast majority of men do feel emasculated. Maybe you don't, but there is a pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 07:32 AM
-1

You know why women seek one, but not simultaneously the other? Because they are hard to find. If more men were good/accomplished/well-behaved people, as well as good looking and tall - we wouldn't have to do this. Call me shallow. You want a woman who's physically attractive and that can cook and clean. News at 11. The difference here is that you can find plenty of women who are attractive. Attractive men don't exist in the same large numbers as attractive women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 07:30 AM
1

It means that you are a true Beta/Omega under the pretense that you are an Alpha, much like a slutty woman who's been railed by 10 men in one night, only to go on a date with a man the next morning and tell him she's a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/17 07:21 AM
1

There are studies that show the opposite though lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 12:52 AM
1

You don't understand my point; I'm not saying that the correlation is not there. I'm saying that there are correlations between many things, there could be a correlation between a woman's length of hair and number of partners for all we know. The truth is: a lot of men just don't like to wed sluts, then they look up for correlations to justify it. It is not wrong that they do not want to wed them, but to argue that sexual partner count is the only thing that affects a marriage is stupid. There i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 09:48 PM
2

He doesn't seem to get that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 03:10 PM
1

I don't actually disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:40 PM
2

Is that advice though? It was a question.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:39 PM
2

Oh please. That post had nothing to do with advice to women. It had to do with men understanding their potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:37 PM
1

This isn't a personal attack, more like an attack on the Red Pill, and you advocate that. Do you understand the differences between and among past performance predicting future performance, and correlations between events? Think about this: most (or at least half of) men do not want a slutty wife, they don't think very hard and deep about why they would not like a slutty wife. They just say "I don't". They don't go into detail saying: the differences between and among past performance predicting…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:36 PM
4

The thing with these correlations between x and y's is that, there could be correlations between anything; there could be correlations between women's hair lengths and their sluttiness, or their foot size and their confidence. We just don't know these because they haven't been tested out. There are studies that show a correlation between a man's height and woman's happiness; I.e. women are in happier marriages when married to tall men. The reason for why this came to mind is because I researched…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:19 PM
1

I find most men unattractive, and the only time I tend to fear for my safety in broad daylight, is when I'm in a place where I'm surrounded by men and there is no woman to be seen. I almost feel like they've planned to gang-rape me and they're all in on this. I feel the same way when I walk into a takeaway or something; the men all just stare at you, gets your scared.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 02:10 PM
1

10/10 for personality and 10/10 for looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 01:56 PM
1

Thank fuck I'm not a guy, being a man sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 12:14 AM
1

I probably wouldn't have even noticed if it wasn't for the fact that I observed who I rejected and who I didn't. Just like other women, I used to say "as long as he's taller than me it's fine!".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 11:16 PM
1

Hahah! You must be a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 10:10 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:17 AM
1

This is getting tiring. I have been posting on here for at least a year, it's pretty clear I'm a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 03:17 AM
2

Oh yes definitely, I think it generally goes downhill from 6'4 onwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 02:45 AM
1

I doubt that, men have to work in order to get a date, all a woman needs to do is say "yes"; we have a lot more options, especially immediate options. Men are replaceable unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 11:53 PM
4

Things like this makes me glad to be a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 11:33 PM
2

I'm mostly red-pilled about dating etc. But I don't like terpers themselves, neither do I like the way that they go about doing things. If there is a moral way to get laid, don't go down the immoral path. Saw this post about how you should "put your sexuality before her feelings" which went into detail about how if a woman was emotionally hurt (crying about an ex etc.) that you should take advantage of that circumstance and try to get laid, because she's too busy being upset to care.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 11:30 PM
1

I think it's to make people feel better. They do this to women especially.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 11:10 PM
1

Can I see what you look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 10:20 PM
1

Damn son! You tryna date on here or something 😂 so what do you lean towards? Blue pill or Red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 10:18 PM
2

People on r/rateme are kiss-asses though, they say that any 4/10 is a 7/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 10:16 PM
2

Men should be dominant, this is something that turns women on. I don't agree with the whole feminist narrative on this. Men who are dominant are by and large, assholes too (I guess that kinda comes with being a man, especially one that is dominant) and therefore it should be expected. Feminist women complain about the downsides of dominant men, not the benefits I'm guessing. I don't really see how objectification of women = dominance. You can be dominant, appreciate the beauty of women and not o…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 08:04 PM
4

Everyone is 6'- 6'3 on this sub today, it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 06:16 PM
3

9/10. Some guys have said I am "one of the most beautiful women" they've ever seen.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:58 PM
1

Didn't Christopher Hitchens support the same idea? I think he's generally right, women didn't need to be funny in order to get laid, some men also did not need to be funny in order to get laid, but for those who did not have the looks/money they probably used their charm and personality to get laid. Alongside that, what may also be a bigger contributor to women not being as funny, is the fact that they often have a small window of what they can joke about; if it's something offensive, because wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:33 PM
1

Because getting in shape is harder to do, of course; it takes greater discipline and it's overall more energy-requiring.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:24 PM
2

Do you think that a guy that has all 3, is going to do as well as a guy who has all 3, but also has a 9/10 face and does not have a receding hairline?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:21 PM
1

"...Such a size dimorphism is often explained in terms of sexual selection through either mate choice, with a preference for larger males by females, or through intra-sexual competition, with an increased advantage of larger males in male–male competition (Andersson 1994; Fairbairn et al. 2007). Clearly supporting my point. "...Human males are ± 8% larger than females (Gray and Wolfe 1980), and male body size (i.e. height) plays a role in both human mate choice and intra-sexual competition. Wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:17 PM
1

Wasn't there a RP convention where RP men got together, and practically everyone was middle-aged, had dad-bods and receding hairlines?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 05:07 PM
2

One question that may explain all this garbage: are you short, by any chance?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 04:26 PM
2

Yes that's true, but otherwise a taller man is nearly always better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 04:10 PM
1

This is exactly my point: that it's obvious that one is better than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 04:07 PM
1

Why would a man want to tear himself down? Look at my comment history. I'm a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:19 AM
0

Every guy on here got offended today because I said the truth. They don't like to hear it. And it just so happens that every guy that I discussed this height matter with, is 6'3.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:18 AM
1

I have a cock and also happen to have a certain fetish for taller men. Well duhh I'm a fucking woman, smart arse.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:15 AM
1

Lol. Keep telling yourself that, buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 03:02 AM
1

in the real world The projection is hard with this one. What do you mean "real world"? If your face is a 6.5/10 and you have a height of 5'7, and there comes along a man who's also about a 6.5/10, but he's 6 inches taller than you - most women would pick the second guy. This is a real world example.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:56 AM
0

Boi o boi "...An often-remarked-upon male morphological trait on the mate market is stature (i.e. height) (Lynn & Shurgot 1984; Pierce 1996; Pawlowski & Koziel 2002). Females prefer taller men who, not surprisingly, also have higher reproductive success (Pawlowski et al. 2000; Mueller & Mazur 2001; Nettle 2002a)..."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:37 AM
2

I am a woman, a 5'3 woman, there is no woe-be-on-me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:24 AM
1

Why are you replying to every comment where I say that taller men are attractive? Are you somehow personally offended by this? This is just basic sexual atrraction. Y'all need to calm down and read a science text book.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:13 AM
4

In a vacuum woman prefer a taller man over a shorter one. But we don't live in a vacuum. Not necessarily, two different men could have the same facial rating, but if one is taller, then that one is going to have an overall better rating. Go down to the mall tomorrow and count the first 100 couples you see. Are all those men tall with perfect faces? No? Simmer on that for a while before posting knee jerk pedantry. This is a terrible example, as usual. Go to a mall, will you see any older woman in…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 02:00 AM
7

No, men should try, and they should try to get the best they can. I just don't want them to get all hyped up thinking they're going to slay pussies like Ryan Gosling or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:42 AM
14

Oh please, are we really going to make the 0.5 inch argument? Men who are taller are more attractive. This is simply a fact. The vast majority of women look for this trait in a man. This does not mean that they care about 0.5 inches. What kind of an argument is that? Nobody is saying that. The difference happens at 2+ inches. When we were at work, we were asked what height we preferred on a man (this question was asked by another man) bear in mind that we were surrounded by guys - all of whom we…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 01:38 AM
2

I'm actually really small, 5'3. But luckily as a woman, it doesn't affect me.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:46 AM
2

I'm 5'3, we can be midget friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:44 AM
1

I'm 5'3, the only time I wished the guy was shorter is when we're dancing, and he's behind me and because he's so tall it just wouldn't work together. It would feel very awkward (I'm talking like 6'2, but a 5'10 man would do fine when dancing) But that's the only thing that's a drawback to him being tall, everything else is absolutely great imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:43 AM
3

Same! I used to think that I didn't care about a guy's looks and that as long as he was taller than me it'd be fine, but when I started to observe my own behaviour - I had realised I always rejected so many men, usually of the same kind too, so it was obvious I did have a specific type. My sister is a bit like that, when I asked her about whether or not she prefers taller guys, she said "as long as he's taller than me, I don't care". She's 5'1. She came back from swimming one day and couldn't ke…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:40 AM
1

Oh my I haven't been with a guy as tall as 6'4, yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:29 AM
1

7'8 is where it's at
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:28 AM
2

How tall are you? My sister is 5'1 and she can't keep her excitement to herself when she sees a man that's 6' and above.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:27 AM
1

I mean, imagine your dream man. Now imagine him being 5'7, and also imagine him being 6'1. Which would you prefer?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:21 AM
2

Albeit I must say, women probably don't find a lot of men sexually attractive. I think this is what's meant by the 80% of men being judged as less than average. It's because men, based only off of their looks are just ugly. I agrer with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:20 AM
2

80% of men are attractive to some women as littleknownfacts said correctly. What happens to the other poor 20%? Women will see a man as more attractive as her positive feelings for him increase too, so that man that seemed okay at first becomes hot or highly attractive over their interactions. Agreed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/17 12:09 AM
2

Who said anything about 1cm? By "taller" it's generally meant tall enough to be able to notice it. No?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:57 PM
5

For the 20th time, I'm a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:56 PM
2

Here is the link about the stats that we're discussing look at the 3rd graph.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:55 PM
3

I don't think that resources/status matter as much as they used to. I think women will still find men who have better and more authoritarian jobs (i.e. police officer) more attractive, but I think that it generally has declined, expectations have shifted and women now make their own money.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:53 PM
1

Then I agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:46 PM
3

Your entire OP is saying a man can't exceed 4/10 SMV because of shortness. Am I interpreting that incorrectly? No, I reckon that the majority of men (as per the rule of average goes) are about 5/5.5. However, one thing to consider is that, if the men in r/TheRedPill, really were just like any other average men, and clearly most average men don't really have a problem attracting women - what this therefore means is that the subreddit must be attracting a different demographic, as it's here for me…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:45 PM
2

But that's only true if the rappers are short. There is much less of difference between going from 6'2" from 6 feet than there is from 5'4" to 5'9". It would make the guy in both cases more attractive, but especially in the second case, yes I agree with that. But the point is you don't need to be the best pick to be considered sexually attractive or to have amazing sex. The SMP is relative. not every corner has a 6'6" hunk. I agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:33 PM
2

I know a lot of female celebrities that are in their early 50's that look great. Does this support my hypothesis of women not going through a major loss of attractiveness? You can't use celebs as proof. What we're referencing by the way, is this. look at the 3rd graph.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:31 PM
3

I'm a woman 😂 this kinda moved me though!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:16 PM
3

But a guy who's 6'1" and has the same fashion sense would do even better.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:15 PM
2

I said at the top of my post that I'm u/SnotNoodle...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:09 PM
2

Yes I agree, sorry I missed that part out.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:08 PM
2

but individual circumstances Of course, individual circumstances are different. You will see all sorts of extremes, but when they're all put into one collection, it's visible that taller men do better. This doesn't mean that short men won't do well.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:07 PM
2

I agree with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 11:06 PM
7

This smells like a lookist troll post Dude. I discussed attractiveness and how it affects women in the dating market, twice. But as soon as it's done on men, it's all LOOKISM. LOOKISM. Live it a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:51 PM
8

So are we going to pretend as if the average male is as rich and famous as Mick Jagger? The average man will not achieve anything near that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:45 PM
2

Your projecting male sexuality onto females. Many rappers or gangsters aren't tall or facially handsome or have strong jaws, yet are loaded with women. You have yet to explain why women lust after men who are masculine looking but aren't tall or facially handsome. Well, in the same way, there are also women who are older that are also good at attracting men. Those men that she can attract are attracted to her. But he would've found her even more of a catch if she was younger. In the same way, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:43 PM
1

Look at the conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:40 PM
2

I don't agree with that, but this is far as it'd go as you don't have anything to support your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:39 PM
2

. Pouring their hearts out? Wtf? Shorter women don't mind short guys, and plenty don't even mind a man shorter than them, either. Those are whom short men have a shot with more so than not. Oh honey, you must be new to the dating game. Click on the 2nd link about height and it says that for shorter women, the gap in height preference is especially large.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:38 PM
1

Definitely, but probably has more to do with personality I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:33 PM
3

Yeh you're right, I worded that wrong. Most guys are probably like a 5 as per the rule of averageness goes. However, I'm guessing you don't mean women's perception of male attractiveness, right? Just the general population's, because I think it is something that's true, that women find 80% of men below average. Most of the men that approach either me or my friends, we nearly always don't find them fit. It rarely happens. Although it may have more to do with women being more feel-y and getting to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:02 PM
3

That's a very convenient way of just shutting all those studies down. The reality is that you can estimate a lot about people from pictures, whether it's their fatness or other things. It would actually be in the male's favour if it was a picture, given that height would not be considered.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:58 PM
3

That's exactly my experience. You tell them the truth, and it's all: Wow. What a bitch. And if you don't, he's all: So you basically led me on?? Nigga you're not really giving me a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:56 PM
2

It can, but he can't be a manlet though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:55 PM
3

What about that study I posted?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:53 PM
3

The vast majority of men aren't 5-7, especially if we go by the study that I posted yesterday where a male's physical attractiveness, at 43, was 4.5. And men at 43 arguably don't look as good as they once did.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:53 PM
11

Those OKCupid stats show that the majority of men (80%) are perceived as less than average though.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 09:49 PM
2

So then why is it that a great number of women are bisexual in comparison to men? I read about a study a while back where it noted that women who identified as straight, were sexually aroused by pics of other naked women. The same wasn't noted about men who identified as straight. So I would have to agree with him that on the average, women are just much more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/16 01:34 PM
1

This is just my opinion: I feel as though, if a woman rejects a man for a ONS, she rejects him because "there are better men to have it with", the guy might find luck with the next woman, or he might not. If a man was to refuse to LTR a woman simply because she isn't a virgin, you are dismissing the quality of a potential lover overall, based on the fact that they have had sex (which is natural). The female would be "shamed for life" whereas the male wouldn't be, he still has a chance of being w…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 02:52 PM
1

I know this is an old thread but: men fuck around with sluts in their younger years leaving the good girls "in the dust" only to then after 10 years after they've fucked down, want to settle with a virgin. They are essentially doing the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 02:03 AM
1

I know this is an old thread but, hallelujah. This is what my problem is, men fucking sluts under the disguise that they are sex-positive. In the same way that they do not like to be lied to when it comes to the female's N count, they should also not lie about their position when it comes to females having sex freely. So out of fear of not getting laid, they lie. Isn't that comparable to the female lying about her N count when settling with a male? Both are deceptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 01:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter