TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bluehusky24 Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by Bluehusky24 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yep, Texas has established that 4 years of retroactive support is in the "best interest of the child" however judges are more commonly known to order MORE years of retroactive support and not less.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 12:16 PM
1

Not in Texas unfortunately, it's pretty much standard operating procedure
/r/MensRights10/06/17 11:09 PM
1

Well you are assuming that this man doesn't have other financial obligations and that he was told in a timely manner about the child. What about in cases where the woman doesn't even tell the father til he has started a family and has other children to support that he was well aware of. Those children matter very little or not at all to the courts depending on the state, despite that he had no clue that he had another child out there. You are already paying for children with your taxes. The chil…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:13 PM
1

And what of mothers whom recieve child support to the tune of 5k per month because they had children by multiple fathers? In those cases the woman has not only covered the children's expenses but has also nullified any financial responsibility she has to support herself. She is in no way required to work whereas if a man loses his job those missed payments could cause him to lose his license or go to jail. In my state of you have two children by the same father you recieve 25% of that mans incom…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:04 PM
1

Ok so first of all regarding your claim that this puts women in a bad position if the guy says "fuck that," I'm pretty sure most people would agree that there needs to be a timeline where the father can choose to financially abort. Something along the lines of 8-12 weeks after the woman first notified him of the pregnancy or that she had his child. This would actually give the woman a MORE clear picture as to what his involvement would be so she can plan accordingly and explore all her options. …
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:39 PM
1

Her parents don't get a say if she files or not, and OAG services are pretty much free for custodial parents meaning she won't need any financial backing for an attorney. If she ever gets government assistance (food stamps, daycare assistance, Medicaid) the state itself will likely come after you. I know it's not what you want to hear but if it's your kid the smartest thing you can do is get on child support through the state assuming retroactive support exists in the state you live, or else you…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 07:24 PM
1

Ignoring child support is horrible advice depending on his state in five years they could file for paternity testing and be ordered to pay five years of retroactive support plus interest.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:35 PM
3

I know in my state the hubbub was over "disrupting the child's life" if they found out that the man whom was raising them was not their biological father. I also find it interesting that when Persuing non married fathers they explicitly state that it is in the best interest of the child to have the knowledge of who their biological fathers are in terms of genetic diseases and health risks. So It seems my state changes their argument based on how it suits them at the time. One particular judge in…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:30 PM
1

Ok first yes this situation is unfair but your options are very limited at this point, there are only a few things you can control. First no judge is going to make her give it up for adoption even based on the information above, yes she's a manipulative woman and more than possibly a loon but in the eyes of the law that does not make her an unfit parent. Second contrary to what I saw in a few of the comments the above will make no difference when it's comes to child support. 24 year old boys who…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:49 PM
1

It is most certainly broken and no the above will not make one iota of difference when it comes to child support. I just don't want to give OP hope where there is none. Hell there have been more than a few cases where a young teen who was raped in terms of statutory rape ( as in they were under 18 and a teacher coerced them to have sex) were forced to pay child support despite that they could not legally even consent to sex.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:27 PM
1

Thank you, I never re post things so I had no clue how to link it!
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:05 PM
3

I live in a state where there is a history of sealing records when the paternity was not contested within 4 years so I definitely understand your point. Personally I believe that paternity testing should be available to men regardless of marriage status to clarify. I also concede that everyone who pointed out the marriage "clause" are correct in that I did not think of all scenarios, but instead used the limited scope of my marriage in which children are very much wanted and planned for, which i…
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:04 PM
4

There was a post on r/askaliberal not too long ago (maybe a week ago max) that I commented on it would have some good points
/r/MensRights08/06/17 03:46 AM
1

I'm curious how this argument would work in a case in which the ex does not work, but instead just collects child support from several men, which happens quite frequently in my area. that's the part of child support that really rubs me the wrong way. The courts say to the father you are financially responsible for this child and must maximize your income however a woman is under absolutely no obligation to financially support herself or the children in that she is allowed to use child support to…
/r/MGTOW04/06/17 01:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter