TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bmarquez1997 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by Bmarquez1997 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

The main difference is that she told the story and there aren't any victims coming forward about this, whereas with Cosby the women came forward and opened a lawsuit. Without victims/witnesses there's no way to prove the case, she could've just been acting tough. Doesn't make her any less trash, but from a legal standpoint I think that's why nothing's been done
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:57 PM
2

While I can't disagree with you on any of those points, I try and keep a positive mindset about the world. Many of the things I see on here are berating women for saying "all men X", yet will turn around and use statements about "all women Y" without seeing the hypocricy about it. I'd like to believe that all these things are just the vocal minority of women that cause these issues. As for the principles of the scout. You just wait and watch them be eroded I have a very bad feeling that the scou…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 04:40 PM
2

Dragging social class segregation into a question of forcing a club to accept anyone. Maybe the civil rights part was too far, but I still stand with the woman's rights movement being a similar argument. Men didn't want women in the workplace because "they're going to make it inefficient and how they want it to be", or didn't want them to vote because "they'll just vote for people that help women and not men". Same thing here, people are afraid that women joining scouts means that the program is…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 04:11 PM
1

It just leads to boys not being allowed to do things that girls can't/won't do. How so? Give me an example of how this would happen in a situation like this, in the Boy Scouting program? Currently, no scout is forced to anything. Don't want to take the time to advance in rank/earn merit badges? Don't do it. Troop is going on a camping trip that involves something you're uncomfortable with? Don't go. The beauty of scouting is that it can be whatever you want it to be, due to the youth leadership …
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:54 PM
2

Hence why you have to have a separate Boy Scout troop for each gender. If those two troops choose to go on a camping trip together that's fine, but also they have the freedom to do their own activities/meetings/camping trips/etc. Just because boys and girls need time to just be themselves without the other gender judging them doesn't mean that half the population should be punished and not allowed to participate in such an incredible program. Using an example from history, right now it's more of…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:50 PM
1

How is allowing girls to join Boy Scout troops (technically they have to start their own all-girl troops, co-ed troops still aren't allowed yet) ruining it for anyone? The way I see it, the US is catching up with our European counterparts (the ones who started the program) and opening our doors to everyone, so everyone can experience the program and learn the invaluable life skills that Boy Scouts has to offer. Quoting myself in another comment (above if you'd like to read it all) but maybe this…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:16 PM
4

Sorry you're getting downvoted so much, but I'm glad that I'm not the only one with this viewpoint! As someone who went through the full boy scout program (Tiger cub to Eagle Scout) and had sisters participate in both Girl Scouts and American Heritage Girls, I'm so glad to finally see the US catch up with Europe (the place where scouting was born) and make it all-inclusive. The difference in the programs in quite large, and for someone who isn't in them it can be hard to see or understand why th…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:13 PM
1

From my experience, I've noticed that typically women use hashtags more than men do, so I'm guessing that has a bit to do with it. Also, as stated a couple of times in other comments women typically are quicker to go post things on social media, both validating/building up other women, and talking down at men (compared to the reverse, men talking up other men and talking down at women). I'd bet that if you look into some of those tags you'd find quite a lot of social media influencers trying to …
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:17 PM
3

Didn't see it in the article, but I think some more information on this is needed... Did the wife know the child was a result of the affair, or did she think it was actually his child up until this point? If she knew the whole time and kept it from her then I agree there should be some kind of repayment to the man because he was lied to and told that it was his son so he would pay for the expenses of raising said child. However, if the wife truly thought it was his son, then I think it's a diffe…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:54 PM
1

Personally, I thought the movie looked like it was going to be decent, but now I hope it's not going to be filled with more of this kind of stuff. Like, it doesn't mean that it's men in black clothes, the organization is called that and defends the good of MANkind. Plus, "People in Black" sounds dumb and kind of splits it off from the rest of the series
/r/MensRights13/06/19 04:56 PM
3

If man caves go, then so do "She-Sheds". It's all or nothing, you can't take one but not the other
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:50 PM
2

The “right” to kill another human being That goes back to when the clump of cells in the mother's belly is considered a "human being." If it's a human from the beginning of conception, in that case, is taking a plan B considered killing said human? Even if the fetus is considered a human from day 1, the concept of body autonomy still exists, and nobody can force you to donate or give your body to said fetus for 9 months. Even though I'm 100% pro choice, I still think abortion is wrong in most ca…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:41 PM
10

Why do you care what other people decide to do with themselves? If that's what they feel is the right thing to do, then they have the right to do so and will have to live with their decision. Also, have a source to back up that extreme statement?
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:48 PM
1

Although it's awful that it's come to this, if men (or women, it applies to both genders) don't feel comfortable having a private one-on-one meeting with an employee of the opposite gender, then it's 100% their right to exercise caution. Now, that shouldn't mean avoid/ignore said employee, but it's not hard to find a way to avoid private situations (like meeting in the common work area instead of a closed office)
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:42 AM
1

Although it's awful that it's come to this, if men (or women, it applies to both genders) don't feel comfortable having a private one-on-one meeting with an employee of the opposite gender, then it's 100% their right to exercise caution. Now, that shouldn't mean avoid/ignore said employee, but it's not hard to find a way to avoid private situations (like meeting in the common work area instead of a closed office)
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:40 AM
1

Although it's awful that it's come to this, if men (or women, it applies to both genders) don't feel comfortable having a private one-on-one meeting with an employee of the opposite gender, then it's 100% their right to exercise caution. Now, that shouldn't mean avoid/ignore said employee, but it's not hard to find a way to avoid private situations (like meeting in the common work area instead of a closed office)
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:39 AM
1

Although it's awful that it's come to this, if men (or women, it applies to both genders) don't feel comfortable having a private one-on-one meeting with an employee of the opposite gender, then it's 100% their right to exercise caution. Now, that shouldn't mean avoid/ignore said employee, but it's not hard to find a way to avoid private situations (like meeting in the common work area instead of a closed office)
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:39 AM
1

I mean, the best way to prevent things from happening (or prevent possibility for blame) is to not be in those situations. In scouts whenever two scouts of the opposite gender were "buddies" to do something, you went two-deep: two of one gender go to avoid situations. Same thing with adult leaders, if the leader was a different gender than the scout either two scouts or two leaders went together, again to prevent anything from happening (and provide a witness if anything did/didn't happen). Alth…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:39 AM
1

I mean, the best way to prevent things from happening (or prevent possibility for blame) is to not be in those situations. In scouts whenever two scouts of the opposite gender were "buddies" to do something, you went two-deep: two of one gender go to avoid situations. Same thing with adult leaders, if the leader was a different gender than the scout either two scouts or two leaders went together, again to prevent anything from happening (and provide a witness if anything did/didn't happen). Alth…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:39 AM
10

Have any sources to back that up? Why would a child not benefit from having both parents in their life instead of primarily living with one and only seeing the other a couple times a month?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:05 PM
2

Ah, okay. I was going to say, I would've thought doing either of those would've pointed out that I didn't do it, so that makes more sense. Thanks!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:48 PM
20

Huh, didn't know that. I'm a 22 year old man in the US, have registered to vote, and never had to sign up (and was never threatened heavy penalties). Did I miss a memo or something?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:18 PM
1

No problem! And yeah, I noticed that haha. I think it must be something with reddit's formatting (like adding two * for bold), because I can see it in the editor but not the post preview. Oh well ¯ \ (ツ) / ¯
/r/MensRights21/03/19 01:34 PM
1

Yeah, pretty much. If there's something/someone I don't like, I just ignore whatever they're doing/the material they're making (ex: I don't watch Shumer's comedy specials), however if other people enjoy them then cool, glad they enjoy it. I don't really go out of my way to boycott/get angry about stuff unless it is actively causing harm or is something that needs to stop because it's idiotic.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 02:51 PM
1

True. I've just always found rape jokes to be of poor taste (especially concerning a woman raping a man) because it desensitizes people to the severity of the action. Heck, for the longest time if a man mentioned a woman raped them they would be hit with either a "woman can't rape men" or even a "don't be a wimp, you got sex" kind of response, instead of treating it with the same level of importance/care that a woman in the same situation would receive. For someone who says they stand for equali…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:56 PM
1

Correct, you can say whatever you want and upload it to youtube. Free speech, right? However, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism, so people can then comment on said video (expressing their right to free speech) if you made jokes or content that they feel was offensive to them. Nobody is free from criticism, and if you try to prevent people from being able to express said criticism then that's a form of censorship, aka removing their right to free speech on that topic.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:39 PM
1

you 100% can get upset over jokes, especially if they are in poor taste. With your logic, if someone tells a room full of jewish people a bunch of holocaust jokes, they can't get upset about them because "it's comedy/art...". Now I might be wrong but I'm assuming that wouldn't go over very well with them
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:15 PM
2

It's this, but in emoji form ¯_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights19/03/19 01:32 PM
9

The way I see the character is basically the superman of marvel. Super powerful, practically invincible, generic backstory. Not really a bad thing for say, but I'm not a huge fan of the whole superman-esque hero that can't be killed
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:27 AM
15

Nope, only one. That one you're thinking of was actually called Ghostbusters 2
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:26 AM
1

Correct, that's what made me think of my sisters and mother making those comments about Ghostbusters. I'm not sure if that's what the original tweet was referencing, or if that was just OP putting an example of a movie that fits the situation.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:53 PM
2

I don't think it's specifically referring to Captain Marvel, but could be read in context of that whole situation. I agree, I don't think you should be able to review a movie you haven't seen yet, that doesn't make sense. IIRC the backlash from that movie isn't just that she wanted a diverse panel of reviewers, but because of a tweet she put out, something along the lines of "If you're a man don't go see Captain Marvel on opening weekend, leave room for the people the movie is actually meant for…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 06:40 PM
32

I think the fact that if you're a white man and criticize any movie that has a diverse cast that you're doing it only because your "weak white male ego" was hurt due to not enough white men in the movie, instead of accepting actual criticism
/r/MensRights05/03/19 03:33 PM
29

I'm not too familiar with the way they went, what happened?
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:54 PM
1

People who become uber drivers as another source of income to pay bills/support their families? It's no different than being a taxi driver
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:04 PM
14

I think there's a little bit of a difference between just being grabbed and being forced to finger someone/have a woman try and have sex while you are extremely intoxicated and can't consent.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:09 PM
3

I know it's a satirical piece, but this is actually hilarious 😂 and being honest, if they just changed some of the parts from just "nagging and wrecking cars" to actual things that are starting to happen like "false rape claims and saying all men are trash" (basically go from toxic femininity to toxic extreme feminists) it probably would have the same right to publish as the Gillette ad did 😂
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:42 PM
0

Exactly! I mean when it is used correctly it actually helps keep conversations on track (ex: a post about 3d printing, and someone comments "ur mum gay", downvoting bumps it to the bottom so you don't really see it), but downvoting contradicting comments or comments acting controversial questions is almost as bad as straight up censoring them
/r/MensRights19/01/19 01:03 AM
0

From my understanding downvoting a post or comment means that it either doesn't fit or doesn't contribute to a conversation or subreddit, correct? Most of the time I see people just using it as a dislike button, even if it's a valid response in a conversation.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:52 PM
5

/s typically stands for sarcasm in reddit comments. It's kind of a way to say sarcastic things, without people taking it serious on accident. I had a /s? because I was being semi-sarcastic, but at the same time being serious
/r/MensRights18/01/19 09:31 PM
13

That's why I put the question mark after the /s, because part of me actually believes there should be those same kinds of benefits. Although those pipelines are great, I feel it should only be with getting people into the field of study, not into positions themselves. If you keep those quotas, you're adding in that bias to the hiring process, which could lead to great candidates being overlooked just because they aren't part of the minority. But extra scholarships or programs to get that minorit…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:48 PM
54

The same way you encourage women to be engineers I suppose. Offer scholarships for being part of the minority of teaching students, have some schools or institutions hire them based on being men in teaching to meet some quota, need I go on? /s? In all reality I think it just comes down to what people want to do at this point. There aren't really any rules saying "men need to do this, women need to do this", so I guess it's just a majority of men don't want to go into teaching. Following that, I …
/r/MensRights18/01/19 07:04 PM
3

From what I've seen with my siblings (and even people with their pets) is that the main reason positive change comes from negative reinforcement is because of the fear of getting more. If you hit a dog because it peed on the rug, it won't do it again not because it now knows not to, but because it doesn't want to be hit again.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 06:26 PM
2

It did a great job at explaining why. Before some of the responses to my comment, the only real explanation I was given was "it says men are bad and attacks us", which I didn't directly see. But watching it again after reading these explanations those issues were more apparent. Thanks again for taking the time to respond with your explanation!!
/r/MensRights18/01/19 06:24 PM
2

I know exactly where you're coming from, because I've caught myself doing the same thing from time to time. Just hearing the blanket statements of how men are dumb and useless and violent and just terrible kind of knocks you down (even if you know you don't fit those descriptions), and so when you see something throwing the blame back at them you upvote or say things as kind of a retaliation. But when I think about it, turning it back around on them and blaming them for things isn't really makin…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 06:21 PM
1

Yeah, I've found that more people use the vote system like that nowadays, almost as if they are like/dislike buttons. As long as it stays under like 30 downvotes I think I'll survive haha. Any more than that and I'll risk the "scroll through downvotes", where people just downvote to join the crowd
/r/MensRights18/01/19 03:23 PM
14

I think that kind of relates into the positive vs negative reinforcement way of teaching people (especially kids). If you kid leaves their legos all over the floor, instead of yelling at them (negative), you can suggest that "we wouldn't want these getting broken or stepped on, how about we put these back in their box so they're safe?" (positive). People would be more likey to change from an ad (like the big brothers one you mentioned) saying "hey let's all be good influences to others", instead…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 01:33 PM
13

That is an incredibly well written explanation, and I 100% agree with everything in there. There are so many points in there that I've tried to explain to others, but they have just taken it as "oh you're just defending your shitty actions", like the "mansplaining" concept (which like you said is literally just elaborating on what someone else is saying, and can be done by either gender)
/r/MensRights18/01/19 12:55 PM
10

I'm so used to seeing everything portrayed in a negative light, I just kind of accepted/ignored that part. That's a great point though, you shouldn't be talking negative about your audience, it should've been done in a positive light. Thanks for the explanation!!
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:40 AM
29

I agree, it's a weird message coming from a razor/hygene products company. If they would've spun it in a different direction, and cut out the negative part (making the commercial more "kids need role models, and you need to be a role model..."), Would it have been as bad of a message?
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:39 AM
1

Good point, I never thought about that. I guess I don't see enough commercials regularly to separate them from just other company agenda videos. Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:37 AM
-13

Maybe I'm missing something, but I still don't fully see why people are upset with the commercial... Essentially the message was "don't use being a boy as an excuse for bullying and making sexual advances unwanted/innapropriate sexual actions, be a good role model for the next generation". Sure, they put all the blame on the fathers and ignored women (since boys can also be raised by a single mother/grandmother), but I don't think it's so bad to say be a good role model, is it? If I missed somet…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:02 AM
5

This is one of those things that really kind of irks me the wrong way. At this point I feel like the only thing stopping people from going into a line of work or studying a topic is their choice. Women can go into engineering if they want to, but looking at the numbers many would prefer to go into a different career path. Just because most engineering jobs are filled by men, doesn't mean that those companies are biased against women. They choose the candidates that seem best fit for the job. Any…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:28 PM
1

I mean first of all I'm not a parent, but how is trying to calm back down your child entitled? Think of it this way, if you take your child outside to calm them down, you not only have to take the time it takes to calm them down, but also to walk outside, thus disrupting everyone you walk past as well. If it's a larger store, that could extend the tantrum by maybe 10-15 minutes depending on where you are. Plus, any time I see a parent dragging their kid around the store while they're throwing a …
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:12 AM
15

Kids will be kids, you can't really stop them from throwing a temper tantrum in public. You can, however, do your best to calm them down if they do throw one instead of just continuing to walk around the store with them screaming and crying. From OPs post, whilst calming him down It sounds like he was in the process of calming down his son, not just "fucking up the shopping environment for strangers" by trying to ignore the tantrum.
/r/MensRights11/01/19 01:07 PM
0

I've always seen medicine/medical type degrees as their own major category, so I've never seen them as a sub-category of something else. But looking at it that way I see how it falls under science as a whole
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:59 PM
4

I've always seen medicine as its own major category, so I never really thought about it being a sub-category of science in general
/r/MensRights15/12/18 10:58 PM
6

Isn't STEM Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics? I guess you could technically include medical sciences in there, but they probably mean like STEM as a whole?
/r/MensRights15/12/18 07:07 PM
4

If I recall correctly the saying was what, "no ovaries, no opinion?", when it came to the abortion laws. But obviously, they meant for any decision, not just those that deal with women, right? /s
/r/MensRights26/11/18 01:10 PM
20

Thanks for the heads up, I will not be clicking this at work haha
/r/MensRights06/07/18 01:54 PM
2

Is it possible to mansplain an event that happens to you? I'm sure a feminist would be able to tell you how to do that haha
/r/MensRights25/06/18 07:55 PM
6

I mean nobody except for the person experiencing it could really describe how they feel, and even then it might be difficult to remember those feelings.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:56 PM
9

Mansplaining a female story? I thought the book is a women writing a story from the man's point of view of being raped? Isn't mansplaining when a man explains something to a women in a condescending way, not just telling a story about something that happened to them?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter