TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bob3333 Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by Bob3333 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

there are methodological individualists who aren't libertarians (I may personally consider them inconsistent, but they're still methodological individualists). Contrary to the beliefs of some who are more comfortable feeling as though they are diametrically opposed to everything leftist, socialist and Communist ideologies are in nearly perfect agreement with Libertarian philosophy in regards to the rights of the individual in his/her own private lives. The difference lies in the beliefs about th…
/r/MensRights03/07/13 05:00 PM
5

As a left-wing progressive, please let me reiterate my complete and total revulsion towards the "Radical Second Wave" as you've labeled them. I do take issue with conflating the two and painting it as a "Rabidly insane leftists vs. reasoned sane libertarians." Just because a bunch of morons co-opted Marxist constructs and applied them where Marx did not, presumably intentionally, does not suddenly make them some legitimate subset of Marxists or leftists.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 04:27 PM
2

I've wondered for a lot of my life if the extremists in any group are really trolls. Think about it. If you were a woman that hated the feminist movement, what better way to discredit it than appear in national media spouting crazy shit like this? Likewise, if you were someone very opposed to mixing religion with politics what better way to turn the public off of it than become a politician that does outrageous things like submit bills banning teaching evolution?
/r/MensRights14/02/11 03:18 AM
1

youre misreading that FBI chart. Dude, seriously? You should look at this page. The header is pretty large.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 04:57 PM
1

So if you're charged with running a red light and the judge finds you not guilty, that means the law against running red lights doesn't apply to you?
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:38 PM
1

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7045725 http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2006/excels/table3.xls According to the FBI stats, whites represented 40.8% of the offenses where the offender was known in hate crimes in 2007. That leaves 59.2% non-white.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:37 PM
1

Again, we're talking about two different things. You were claiming that the LAW didn't apply to white people. I showed you that it does apply to all races equally. Selective enforcement is a problem in many areas, not just racial relations. Show me how many women have been convicted of domestic violence. Show me how many people went to jail for stealing the life savings of millions of people in the S&L failures of the 80's.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 03:18 PM
1

No, we're talking about whether "protected class" applies to every race, including white. The answer is "yes," and you now have your evidence. If you are claiming there is legislation that preempts these Federal Statutes, you're going to have to cite them. Like I said before, rational debate does not take place by you make claims and then I go find out if they're true.
/r/MensRights13/10/10 02:40 PM
-1

Race as a protected class is defined by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Neither of these two Federal statutes mention any specific race. Your turn. Go.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 06:26 PM
-1

You make the claim, you get the evidence. Rational arguments do not proceed with you making the claims and then I go research the evidence.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:44 PM
3

That was when someone said they were ignoring everyone behind them. That's pretty much a girl thing.
/r/MensRights10/10/10 04:29 AM
13

Not because they're fat, but because they're blocking the way and not showing any consideration for the people behind them. I don't care if you're fat or skinny, THAT'S top-shelf douchery.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 06:17 PM
14

I know what will happen, but that has nothing to do with what constitutes a "protected class."
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:25 PM
11

I don't know about where you work, but in my high-rise every earthquake generates pandemonium among females. There are several of them near me that literally run around in circles, wide-eyed and panicked. These people are VERY dangerous in a real emergency because you don't know what they're going to do, and panicked people tend to do stupid things. I don't know what the answer is, but it scares me to have these people around. I've always told myself I will have no problem literally punching the…
/r/MensRights09/10/10 05:18 PM
12

they are not a protected class. Nice try Glen Beck. Race is a protected class, even if it's white. There is no list of races that are protected.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 04:55 PM
5

we were packed in such that one person's inability/refusal to keep themselves in such a shape as to be even marginally mobile could have endangered the lives of 200 people. Make the fatty a bowling ball and roll her ass down the stairs. Two bonuses: 1) Fatty out of the way; 2) any other slow asses out of the way.
/r/MensRights09/10/10 04:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter