TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bobarhino Archive

View 3 posts and 100 comments by Bobarhino on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

There is. Haven't you ever heard of libertarians?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:51 PM
2

Given the context of the supposed quote, I don't think the guy that supposedly said it is the one making it a gender issue. It was an issue before he supposedly said it, otherwise it might have never happened in the first place. So, the one making it a gender issue is whoever decided to make race and gender based quotas; the State. Remove the state, solve the problem. It's not our government's responsibility to regulate who can hire whom based on the governing power's specific preferred agendas.…
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:08 PM
3

Even if it was said, while that's a harsh way to say it, it might not be untrue. State sanctioned sex and race based quotas are prevalent throughout our society.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 02:00 PM
2

Their argument is that you were lucky to have been born a white male and because of that you can't understand how you're lucky. I think their argument falls on Hitchen's Razor.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:49 AM
1

The following should be a philosraptor meme. If a white heterosexual male can't access white heterosexual male privilege, does that mean white heterosexual male privilege doesn't really exist?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:44 AM
15

I just think is kind of ridiculous for her to do less time than him, regardless of whether or not she cooperated with police, because she's the one that actually abused the baby to death.
/r/MensRights17/05/14 04:13 AM
2

Well, I agree that there are at least three sides to every story. Unfortunately, we don't know his side at all. We barely know a teeny tiny sliver of the cop's side of the story. Ultimately, it boils down to whether or not raising your voice is assault. As far as I know there aren't any laws against raising one's voice. I'm not exactly sure who you think this blog is editorializing for. In the very first sentence it paints the picture that this man was a giant monster by claiming she was a victi…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 03:53 AM
10

Making a bad call for a cop is ordering decaf with your donut. This cop threw salt in the wound when he victimized the victim.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 01:52 AM
6

Could be corrupt? We know at least the arresting officer is corrupt. If they make his life hell he only needs to document with evidence their actions and bring another lawsuit.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:51 AM
15

He should file a suit against the cop and the department for false arrest/imprisonment and have his arrest record expunged.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:35 AM
18

No, he won't be fine. Now he's got an arrest record. Anyone can look him up and find his mug shot; a mug shot that never should have existed. It might even show up in one of those mug shot mags that you can pick up at your local gas station for a dollar or two. Also, what if he lost his job or his residence because of this feminism?
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:20 AM
2

Last night I had a back and forth with a professor friend of mine about white male privilege. This morning I posed the question "Non-white males of Reddit, how are you privileged?" on /r/askReddit and was immediately down voted. Only a couple of people responded seriously.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:10 AM
1

I didn't see disconnected from reality in the form of a question.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 06:24 PM
2

I'm sorry, but fuck that. I'm wearing a solid black t-shirt tomorrow. That'll show them. For real though, that could be a good counter in the MR movement to spread the word about the fallacy to the masses so we can move past this BS. We should ALL wear black tomorrow!!! I can't wait for the day that a political candidate comes out and speaks the truth about this subject. And when he/she does, I hope he/she wears a solid black t-shirt too.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:42 AM
9

"Oh, my God. Becky, look at her butt. It's just, like, out there." Only boys are distracted by such things...
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:17 AM
17

No, all of that is bullshit. Not only the second sentence.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 01:40 AM
14

The malicious intent was proven when she lied to this judge saying she knew he was the father. Then when the test results come in the judge asked if she knew the father and she admitted she does and sees him frequently. She knew the father, but went after this man for child support his wages were garnished for and he lost five years of his life on top of that. She should lose everything she owns, including her liberty, for the amount of time she went after this guy, 18 years.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 02:58 PM
1

Thank you. I just shat my pantaloons.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:33 PM
58

My first thought: "Why is there a picture of Hitler?" then I realized it wasn't Hitler...
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:31 PM
-1

Fuck yeah. You tell that little fucking bitch motherfucker we're not gonna take his stupid fucking bullshit telling us what the fuck to fucking say. InsaneHoshi is probably a fucking child abusing baby raping murderer because he isn't adamantly against mutilating male genitalia. Fuck insaneHoshi and his God damned bleeding twat mouthed tone policing. Now, there is nothing worth reading in the previous paragraph. It's filled with personal attacks and useless profanities. I could be wrong but I'm …
/r/MensRights05/11/13 01:20 AM
1

I'm not suggesting universal circumcision. I'm suggesting parents have the right to choose. I'm pro choice. You're not.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:44 PM
1

YES, THEY DO!!! You're wrong. You lose the argument. There's no need to apologize to me. Just admit that you're wrong and move along.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:34 PM
1

What argument have I lost? I'm right about parental rights and the medical benefits regarding circumcision. 60,000 American Pediatricians, using empirical evidence to make their decision, agree with me that there are benefits to circumcision and that those benefits outweigh the risks and that parents have the right to choose what's best for their babies regarding circumcision.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:14 PM
1

If abortion isn't murder then circumcision isn't mutilation. If abortion is a parents rights issue, then so is circumcision. Now do you see how ridiculous that argument is, to suggest that you or the state has the legal or moral authority to claim that parents don't have the right to team up with their doctors to make a medical decision for their son? If you were that 1 in 250,000 you'd feel completely differently about the matter, I guarantee it. I'd like you to tell that one guy that gets peni…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:39 AM
1

Holy shit. Thanks for sharing that!
/r/MensRights03/11/13 03:03 AM
1

Oh, thx for the info. I'll stay away from that sight then. And I'll go try to figure out what doxxing and Violentacrez are unless it'd be easy for you to tell me that too.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:43 AM
1

So you're okay with murdering babies but you have a problem saving them from potentially getting cancer?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 12:59 AM
1

Yeah, in Africa and middle eastern countries where it's done with a sharp rock in a dirt hut. I've seen it. It's a medical procedure. How do you feel about abortions? Ever seen one? I have. It's way worse.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:57 PM
1

I know penile cancer is rare, but it only occurs in the foreskin. If by removing the foreskin you eliminate any possibility of your son ever developing penile cancer, that's a medical purpose and an incredibly personal medical decision that deserves respect regardless of the decision anyone makes in the matter. Is eliminating any and all possibility of developing penile cancer not a good enough reason for you to accept me having a well educated professional licensed doctor circumcise my son in a…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 10:45 PM
1

Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I don't accept new information. But the fact is babies are not autonomous. In other words, they have no free will. Babies can't make decisions for themselves and circumcision is a decision that parents have the right to make for their children. Do you think circumcision should be illegal?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 07:19 PM
1

I know and I appreciate that you're willing to have an adult discussion. It was someone else being verbally abusive, cyber bullying, and trolling and the mods decided to allow it so I unsubscribed from the sub. I had enough of that shit in the feminist sub. I'm not going to deal with it here or anywhere else. There are many things that seem unreasonable to many people for many different reasons. That doesn't mean you or anyone else, including the government, has the authority or the right to inf…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:52 PM
1

Yeah, I realize that now. That just happened to be the first one that popped up on my search and I wasn't aware it wasn't allowed. Is it some kind of feminist site or something?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 06:42 PM
0

Because it's mutilation. From everything I've seen fgm's are performed in middle eastern countries that oppress women both young and old. From what I've seen fgm's are performed in those countries with sharpened stones and other medieval implements. From what I've seen fgm's in those countries are not performed by doctors but are instead performed by untrained laymen that know very little about human anatomy. From what I've seen rather than modifying the clitoral hood, which is the equivalent of…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:58 PM
-1

You were mutilated. Your parents made the decision to ask your doctor to cut off part of your perfectly healthy penis skin. That's rape. Your parents asked your doctor to rape you. Your penis was penetrated and mutilated. You were raped as a newborn baby. And you're okay with that just because you don't remember it. Your parents are basically murderers because they had you circumcised and some babies have died because of circumcisions. And if you do that abominable act to your son, God help you,…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 04:21 AM
1

Why would parents feel the need to put holes in their daughters ears when they are babies rather than letting them choose when they are older? People keep telling me circumcision is mutilation, but I can tell you that I have not been mutilated. And I'm sure my doctor didn't feel as if he were mutilating me. I certainly do not remember the pain of the operation, nor do I hold any ill will to those that made the decision for me to be circumcised. Why, then, should I expect those things to be diffe…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:51 AM
1

I would appreciate that very much if you would not interfere in anymore of my conversations ever again.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 03:05 AM
1

Tell me, real man, what is it that makes you a real man? Tell me, real man, do you have a child of your own? Tell me, real man, is name calling something bullies do or is that something real men do?
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:55 AM
1

I completely agree with you 100%.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:44 AM
1

Stop. Fucking. Trolling. Me.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:33 AM
0

In the first year of life, the chance of urinary tract infections are increased by 10% in uncircumcised boys. That's not speculative, nor is it decades in the future. It's a completely avoidable illness. But let's go decades later. If I'm not mistaken, penile cancer only occurs in the foreskin. It's factual, not speculative, then, that if you remove the foreskin you remove all odds of developing penile cancer. the United Nations calculates that if 20 million high-risk men were circumcised by 201…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:18 AM
1

Well, I absolutely do respect the rights of my son. I do not, however, believe he had the mental capacity at one day old to decide whether or not to be circumcised. That was a life choice that I made for him. Should he resent me, his mom, and the doctor later in life for making that decision for him when he was a baby, he is free to do so. I guarantee he will not remember the pain of the medical procedure. There are all kinds of decisions, as parents, that we make that alter the lives of our chi…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 02:07 AM
1

You are obviously incapable of having a civilized discussion. You're like a super troll. If you spoke to me like this in person, I would bash your fucking face in with my fist until you stopped moving. Leave me the fuck alone.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 01:11 AM
0

Was it you that compared circumcision to cutting off a finger? If so, I see exactly where you regurgitated that thought from, but you must realize it is not the same. There are complications that come with not circumcising boys. I think I've linked you to that information from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the United Nations already. If I have not, let me know and I will. I trust the AAP and UN more than I trust a website created solely as a means to combat circumcision. Honestly, the l…
/r/MensRights02/11/13 12:06 AM
0

A question of ethics. In Africa, for instance, there are indications that circumcision could reduce the risk of HIV infection. That's the last paragraph from the bottom link. Bodily integrity indeed...
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:59 PM
-1

If have breasts you might get breast cancer. Better remove them. It's not the same thing. You see, the difference is that you're not castrating boys, you're cutting off a tiny piece of skin that could cause them serious health problems in the future, including but not limited to penile cancer. If your baby were a girl and if she was born with flaps of skin that covered her nipples, we'll call them nubbins for humorous purposes, and if doctors warned you that the nubbins would increase her chance…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 11:27 PM
-2

I am just getting this so I haven't opened those links yet but I don't think bodily integrity is so greatly compromised with a circumcision as to be an impediment to sexual arousal or sexual stimulation. And I'd actually go further than that to say that if you're truly interested in bodily integrity, you'll realize that without circumcision you increase the risk of losing your entire penis to penile cancer. Without circumcision you increase the risk of contracting HIV. Just have a look at this w…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:19 PM
-2

His body is only his to the extent in which he is competent to control it. Babies have no will, therefore they have no free will, therefore they have no control. Forcing someone to suffer urinary tract infections is a violation of the NAP, yes? Because the link I provided showed that doctors agree there's a 90% increase in the possibility of uncircumcised babies getting potentially life threatening urinary tract infections in the first year of life before they can even tell you they're hungry or…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 10:11 PM
-2

Your application of the Non Aggression Principal in this issue is incorrect. No, it isn't. Causing pain is still violating the NAP. This is not black and white. There are shades of grey. If in order to help you greatly I have to hurt you temporarily, those are decisions that we, as adults and as parents and as doctors, have to make for our children as they can not be made by the child. Forcing one to undergo a risk against their will is a violation of the NAP. Babies do not have wills. Therein l…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:30 PM
-2

I'm libertarian. I look at every issue as a property rights issue. But we are not talking about ourselves, we're talking about our children that can not make medical decisions for themselves. Children do not own themselves until they reach a certain age of maturity. That age differs for every child but never does it happen when they are babies, which is when the 90% increased risks of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised children occurs. Yes, I own my body to an extent. I have the rights to…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 09:19 PM
-3

I don't mean own like a slave. I mean own as in your child is literally a part of you and your partner. I mean own as in your child is your offspring and carries your genetic makeup and as such, when your child is incapable of making the decision to carry on family traditions such as circumcision, it's your responsibility to make that decision for your child. I mean own as in if your child does something, like break a neighbor's window or save a neighbor's drowning dog, you own the responsibilit…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:58 PM
-2

No, I didn't realize that. I would assume that no medical organization advocates circumcision because it is a personal decision to be made by the parents that wish to limit the risks of their baby getting urinary tract infections, limit the risks of penile cancer later in life, and limit the risks of contracting STD's.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:39 PM
-3

Babies are little people, and they have rights that must be protected against any intrusion, but babies are also not independent individuals and are to an extent the product of their environment. Besides, circumcision is a perfectly legitimate medical procedure with benefits that outweigh the risks.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:43 PM
-3

Circumcision is a violation of the Non-Aggression Principal. You are causing harm to a child by damaging their body without their consent. I'm on a real computer now. Not sure how long I've got until my boss comes down but no, it is not a violation of the NAP. It might be slightly painful but that pain is forgotten very quickly. The risks are minimal compared to the rewards. My first google search proves there are benefits to circumscision compared to the risks associated with not circumsizing y…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:40 PM
-3

Well, I apologize for trying to have a serious discussion on my phone. When several different people are attacking you so quickly and all at once, some being reasonable and some not, it's not easy to keep those ducks in a row. Especially when ALL I CAN SEE IS FOUR LINES OF YOUR COMMENT, BACON READER. Now, if you'll excuse me I've got to go to the play store to complain about the new update on this free app that is otherwise the best Reddit app I've found..... :)
/r/MensRights01/11/13 07:18 PM
-2

By the way, I'm neither for nor against circumcision. What I am for is the parent's right to choose what's best for their child. People are comparing circumcision to mutilation. That's ridiculous. No doctor would intentionally perform the procedure were that the case. It's against the oath they take when they become doctors. It's irrational to be so adamantly against a medical procedure that's been practiced for so long. It's irrational to claim this is a men's rights issue as circumcisions are …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:52 PM
-7

The function of foreskin is not a red herring. If it is then you shouldn't use its function as an argument against circumcision. I think circumcision is more of a matter of aesthetics and is typically performed by doctors more for cosmetics reasons than it is for religious or health reasons. Obviously I'm not the only one that's biased here. It seems you and everyone else in this sub has made their mind up that they know what's best for my child. Someone even suggesting physically beating a chil…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:36 PM
-4

You've got serious mental issues. Your username is evidence of that.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:32 PM
-3

I don't believe circumcision is harmful unless it gets infected, then it's the infection that's harmful and not the circumcision. Since the new update I can't read your comment as I reply so... But I'm not disagreeing with myself.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:30 PM
1

I'm on my phone too. Please share links when you can.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:25 PM
-11

Is it okay for a parent to remove their child's ring finger or force them to have religious tattoos? Fingers have uses. Foreskin does not. I think certain cultures have their own rituals that may seem strange to us, but we must take the non-interference approach of the Prime Directive. You're throwing out a bunch of hypotheticals that I don't have the time to entertain.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:52 PM
-12

I don't believe foreskin is nearly as sensitive as you suggest. If the number of nerve endings in foreskin outnumber those in the clitoral hood that's probably becasue of the size variation and not becasue they are important in sexual health or sexual stimulation. I've never had any problem from constant rubbing on clothing. Sounds like you're just making shit up.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:47 PM
-5

I'm a libertarian that lives by the NAP. Clearly, killing your child causes them harm. While they are your children, harm should not come to them by your hands. I'm begging the question of the harm brought to children by circumcision. How important is foreskin in human sexuality?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:43 PM
-5

And that circumcision is illegal. Can you save me the trouble and link me to the infomation that proves it, please?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:40 PM
-14

Fuck you, asshole. This is like arguing with abortionists and anti-abortionists. A child isn't some self sustaining individual, nor is it a parasite while in the womb. Children are our offspring. They are a part of us and as such we are responsible for them. That responsibility is the equivalent of ownership. If you can't wrap your mind around that undeniable fact, leave me alone. Better yet, have your own child and leave it alone to care for itself. It will die, dipshit.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:39 PM
-8

I'm not advocating mutilating babies. What I am advocating is that children belong to their parents. I'm advocating that government not have the authority to tell people and their doctors what they can and can't do in regards to medical procedures. I'm advocating we focus our attention on more important issues than foreskin.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:21 PM
-8

What function does the foreskin have?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 05:10 PM
-10

How do you feel about naming children? Do you think the state should have the power to make that decision instead of the parent?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:40 PM
-13

Is it not a parent's right to indoctrinate their child into their religion? If you answer no then you must believe as the progressives in our country that your child is not your child but instead that your child belongs to the government.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:38 PM
-11

I simply asked a legitimate question because I'm not an expert on the matter and I'm getting blasted with down votes just like I did in /r/askfeminists. As far as I know, from what little I've seen in other countries, females can't be circumcised but are instead castrated. In other words, their clitoris is cut off. That is not the case with circumcision. Circumcision for girls would be like trimming up the labia minora. Is that against the law in the United States? Is it against the law to pierc…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:35 PM
-14

This is not a winnable argument for men's rights in any form or fashion. This issue should be dropped from the men's rights platform immediately. There are far more pressing matters that are winnable to focus our attention on. There is no justice when in order to grant one person freedom from oppression you must oppress another. This is what most people don't understand about the civil rights act. If equality is the goal, and it should be, always, freedom of association must be accompanied with …
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:57 PM
-22

Isn't circumcision a religious thing? If so, wouldn't disallowing parents and priests the religious right to circumcise boys violate the religious rights of others? I have a problem with that.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:40 PM
8

The only way to escape the torture of white male privilege is to be Cherokee. Note to self: Learn to lie on applications like Elizabeth Warren.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 09:58 AM
0

There most certainly is a subculture in which many pedophiles operate. Ever heard of the Franklin Scandal?
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:29 PM
1

It is sensational. That's why it's spreading through the news like it is. My main concern, and I think it'd be wise for us as a group to consider that we might have to defend ourselves against things like this that no other group would have to defend themselves against. For example, if a gang pops up, MS13, there's not a strong political group like feminism that has the power to get away with publicly claiming all Mexicans are MS13 and then try to change laws that negatively effect all Mexicans.…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:15 AM
-3

Is that our best argument against the idea that rape culture is real?
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:04 AM
1

I wondered the same thing... It wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:03 AM
-3

I disagree. Unfortunately, feminists like to lump everyone with a penis into the same group as guys that do this kind of thing. I want to know our best defense against those arguments if I'm ever face to face with a feminist having to defend the majority of men against the claim we all take part in rape culture.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:02 AM
-5

Whoa, I'm not a troll bro. But when things like this happen, how are we supposed to defend ourselves against something that, up until having read this, I only thought existed in prison? This guy didn't rape anybody as far as we know. But he basically gave legitimacy to the feminist idea of rape culture and that helps their ridiculous and absurd idea that all men are rapists. I'm just pointing out that this doesn't help us and the reason I posted here is because I'm wondering if someone else migh…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 03:55 AM
1

While I agree that republicans are hypocrites, I don't agree that there is war on women any more so than there is a war on boys and men. That's the intended message of this video. And I disagree with that message. Until I hear from more frequenters of this sub the jury is still out.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 08:08 PM
1

If this doesn't belong here, let me know and I'll remove it. My buddy is a professor of human sexuality and he posted a link on FB that I followed, but for some reason I ended up on a feminist FB page and this was there. It was so bizarre I thought people in this sub needed to see what we're up against.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 07:50 PM
1

I... I'm not trying to stir the pot but I really don't wanna be a shitlord. Is there something else I can be? I mean, I was born this way. People can't really help the way they're born.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:51 PM
-1

Double face palm. Edit: AM I THE ONLY ONE AROUND HERE THAT NOTICED STEFAN DOUBLE FACE PALM?
/r/MensRights05/10/13 01:07 AM
4

Guys, c'mon. We need to learn how to speak to women the right way. I think the best way to learn to do something the right way is to practice. Proper practice prevents piss poor performance. "Okay, ladies, we're sick of you spending our money. You want equality? Spend your own damn money." Good practice, guys. See you here at 7am sharp to start our very necessary two-a-days.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:02 AM
36

'You are my heart walkin' around outside my body' What a mentally abusive, manipulative bitch.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 05:36 AM
1

Everyone has them. Nobody asserts them. Sometimes you can't without being arrested but when you can it's incredible. When I have it's like using the force. "You do not have the right to enter my apartment without a warrant!" They left and didn't arrest anybody at my party.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 08:43 AM
1

This is the default I suggest to anyone that denies the pendulum of sexism has swung too far the other way. I present the leading authority on the matter of divorce and how it robs men of their constitutional rights, Stephen Baskerville
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:53 PM
3

I don't think that played into his reaction as much as my challenging his authority did because he's a professor first. That means he's always right. He's not used to having someone question him. Especially someone that's equally able to think on such a high level as he. 19-22 year old kids aren't usually so bold as to continue to call bullshit bullshit when it's bullshit.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 10:43 PM
2

I have no doubt that it was. That's another source I used to argue against my buddy when he brought up this supposed real life situation. "A woman gets drunk at a party she threw at her apartment. She goes into her bedroom. A guy she meet at the party follows her and they have sex." He was surprised to find that more than half the women in his human sexuality class didn't think the guy was a rapist. I wanted to know why he was surprised about that. He refused to answer my question. I knew why th…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 10:16 PM
3

He got defensive when I pointed out those two facts. I only pointed out the first fact after explaining that didn't meet my definition of sex based discrimination because having an abortion is not something men can do. When I meant discrimination, I meant something everyone could do, like vote or buy property, that our government was allowing men to do while disallowing women to do.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 09:16 PM
1

Stephen Baskerville is the leading authority on the topic of divorce and how men's rights are unconstitutionally infringed upon by the system, specifically when it comes to children and the family court system.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:55 PM
4

As a side note, a buddy of mine is a professor of psychology in this subject. He also happens to be a professor of human sexuality. A few days ago we got into it about gender roles and how he believes women are oppressed. I asked him to give me an example of state sanctioned oppression of women today, by our government. He gave me two, neither of which lived up to the standard of oppression I was referring to. 1: Politicians are seeking to limit abortion rights. 2: Women change their name on mar…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:01 PM
8

Even your memory is lacking. The key subject did not commit suicide 10 years after being found innocent. After being found guilty based on false memory, he interested an investigative reporter who found the actual guilty man that was also suspected of 50 other rapes in the area. When the judge was presented with this information by the investigative reporter, he released the subject. The subject could not get his job as a restaurant manager back. His fiancée could not take him back because of hi…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 06:47 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:03 PM
19

A real man, as opposed to a real mannequin? Yeah, that's not sexist is it.....
/r/MensRights22/09/13 08:02 PM
1

Too many acronyms. WTF does MGTOW stand for?
/r/MensRights22/09/13 06:18 PM
76

"Because, not being a rapist isn't enough."
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:52 PM
1

Yep, that changes everything. :)
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:40 PM
0

By nature my main focus is on equality in liberty and justice for all. I have this idea that I tell people regarding drug prohibition. I tell them that as long as they use the word marijuana, a word originally used to demonize the cannabis plant, nothing will ever change. I tell people to stop using that word and use cannabis instead. Another example is when people call drug prohibition a war on drugs. In reality, the war is on people. I also tell people that until we start calling it what it is…
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:21 PM
7

Liberal feminism gave us the VAWA.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:14 PM
4

I'll gladly give you an egregious example of institutionalized sex based oppression of men.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 02:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter