TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BobbyDropTableUsers Archive

View 3 posts and 122 comments by BobbyDropTableUsers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Not holding them to the same standards male teachers are held to is blatant sexism. Not calling them pedophiles and rapists is saying "that's ok we don't expect you to have the same degree of self-control and agency as your male colleagues are expected to have in the presence of hormonal teens."
/r/MensRights16/04/23 03:26 AM
3

Exactly- it's all about risk mitigation. Another comparison is like how anyone who's traveled knows the importance of making themselves look like less of a target for pickpockets and/or hiding their cash. Pretending like all men need to change their behavior to make a fraction of women feel safe is like if the tourism industry got together and demanded that everyone in Barcelona (the worst pickpocket city in the world,) keep their hands up when walking next to foreigners so that they won't have …
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:18 PM
2

Plenty of people only walk to and from their car and don't get around by walking instead of driving. The 1 minute walk to the car is not what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:03 PM
33

I get your number comparisons, but your grasp of statistics is wrong. If there are 14mil women in Texas, only a fraction of those walk outside. Of those- only a certain percentage walk where they have the chance of encountering other people. As you apply more qualifying conditions, your population becomes smaller... possibly to the point where you can confidently say that walking in certain area, at a certain hour, with certain behavior, is a high risk activity. However, that's where we have to …
/r/MensRights24/03/21 04:12 PM
-2

What rock have you been living under? Millennials grew up in the Reagan 80's where capitalism's superiority was constantly boasted about. Then in the 90's they were the first generation to grow up with the internet... before it was confined to social media "optmized" search results. Reddit- the platform you're on right now - was created by a millennial. You sound like an angry gen-xer who can't deal with the status quo having changed. You probably grew up in the 70s - the period called the golde…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/20 06:31 PM
13

Yea, burkas and genital mutilation are highly underrated. Fuck modern medicine and the internet. /s WTF is wrong with you? Original, before it's edited: Western civilization was a mistake
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/04/19 07:10 AM
8

That's not how headlines work. They don't use sarcasm. Quotes are there to say it's attributed to someone else, so you don't think the newspaper's getting biased.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 06:31 AM
2

"lol - autocorrect 🤣🍑💩🖖💦🐈💗"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 01:45 AM
3

That's not true at all. People usually kiss teachers asses on here. The fact is that most of them wanted to take an easy major in college and get a secure job with convenient hours. Then one day they realize they can't afford stuff and complain about being underpaid. The problem is that the good ones are underpaid, but the good ones only account for 10% at best. Hell, most of us can only remember 1-2 inspiring teachers out of the hundreds we came across in school. That's why parents sometimes do…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 01:42 AM
1

I had a history/social studies teacher in 7th grade who was also later one of my varisty football coaches in high school. I don't know why he chose to teach at a 7th grade level, but he was one of the best teachers in that school. He taught things beyond the textbook and constantly presented different interpretations of events, not just what the state had in the curriculum. Anyway, as cool as he was in the classroom, he was the crazy angry coach that turns beet red when things went wrong, kickin…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/03/19 01:36 AM
1

Now it's time to get Johnny as a spokesperson for MRA.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:36 PM
5

I wish. Both about the pretty dress and if it were communism. I don't like communism, but communism was more equal than feminism. It put both men and women to work pretty much equally in every type of job- even if it's blue collar and dangerous. Modern intersectional progressive feminists want to rule like the third reich. They'll use whatever they were born into as a credential to get more rights: "Woman? Great! Women of color? Better! Muslim? Give us more! Refugee Immigrant? We can't contain o…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:32 PM
21

This shit going on in Spain, along with misandrist laws in France and UK. Jewish caricatures paraded in Belgium. Anti-americanism everywhere, while at the same time selling weapons to Iran, Pakistan, and Syria. Somethings coming soon. The EU is getting way too unstable.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 05:04 PM
11

This is why Spain has more gay men than the total number of men. I think the actual percentage is like 113%. No lies- it's just basic survival.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 04:53 PM
30

💼 Home Health = I turn tricks for meth out of my trailer.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/03/19 08:05 PM
6

It was a joke. I tried to make that obvious by putting values and pride in quotation marks... Guess it wasn't that obvious.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:32 PM
15

I agree, but it might be the patriarchy, cause you usually learn these things from a father or grandfather. Except they call them "values" - and apparently it makes you feel "pride" to be self-sufficient and constructive without relying on other people. Go figure.
/r/MensRights06/03/19 02:14 PM
4

This is why identity politics annoy me. It's just prejudice going the other way. "You're [some minority intersection]. You should do/like [something stereotypical for what I labeled you as]" What it actually means is that you're not seen as a person anymore. You're just one unit of a category of people from now on. I stood up for a gay friend once when a girl said she needed a "gay best friend," telling her he's not a fucking accessory. He later confided that he feels constantly objectified arou…
/r/MensRights06/03/19 03:34 AM
3

Well- I've been to England and I know to use it. But you can't equate it with the word "nigger" that was used, under slavery, to try to diminish an entire ethnicity of people to something less than human. Anyway- I know I'm not going to prescribe some solution by saying "get over it" but even the wikipedia article you linked showed several examples where a colloquial demonym was accepted by the group, basically taking away its power. My main point is that censoring the word was pointless in the …
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:13 PM
8

It's not exactly the same though. It's not a word that was invented by another group or used exclusively as a racial slur. The PAK in Pakistan is named after Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir. "Stan" is "land of-". So Pakistan means land of the Pakis, and it was coined by Pakistanis. I know that today it's sometimes used derogatorily, but so is the word "Jew" in certain contexts. The difference seems to be that Jews aren't offended by being called Jews. That's why you'd never see it censored. I just thi…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 05:06 PM
17

The mother called Mr Oosthuizen a p*** and told told him to 'go back to his own country' ​ What's up with everything being censored? I don't even know a 4 letter word starting with 'p' that would need to be censored. Poon? Puto? ​ Edit: Nevermind.. later in the article it says "Paki" and it's not censored. Why the hell does "paki" need to be censored? Yes it's offensive when directed at someone- but just reading it and not having it directed at you is not something that necessitates censorship.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:54 PM
43

A friend's wife made her ex seem like an abusive, gambling liar that couldn't be trusted with anything and had to borrow money from everyone around him. As soon as her 12 yo son started having mental health issues and a couple of trips to a therapist didn't solve it, she sent him away to his father- who lives in another country. Then she was surprised when the kid asked a judge over there to give his dad custody. I happened to talk to the dad a few months after that- he seemed more stable and ra…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 03:08 PM
14

Ok- here's the reasonable argument.. beyond the cherry picked comparisons, they also failed to identify the sources of the total compensation. The CEO of Lloyd's gets bonuses and shares because he basically rescued the bank by turning it around from major losses to profitability. His salary is 1.2m pounds. In that link you can see that he is at the higher end of the spectrum. The CEO of RBS makes 1m pounds salary. Compare that to Virgin Money's femalrle CEO Jayne-Anne Gadhia. She takes home a sa…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:26 AM
15

Oh shit. Must be a bug- let me report this to the patriarchy for you, bro.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 03:03 AM
5

No one said they don't affect them. Everyone knows estrogen affects women. A lot of female behaviour is excused thanks to lady problems, mom-brain, or whatever else is convenient at the moment. Estrogen is present in both men and women in overlapping ranges. Some men have more estrogen than some women. With testosterone, men on the low end of the range still have 4 times as much as women on the high end. The biggest difference is the absence or presence of testosterone. The point is not that men…
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:26 AM
38

He does have it right. If these issues were given a money-ball "numbers only" analysis, there would be a solution within a month. The only thing that stands in the way is Harrison Bergeron feminism. The type that needs to tear down men stray from the norm, take risks, and aspire to be something other than the socially acceptable roles prescribed by feminists for men. It creates equality by criticizing unequal results, rather than by supporting an equal starting point. F-to-M transsexuals experie…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 04:12 PM
1

Me neither. I know one guy who always does this shit. Is there a sub for it?
/r/MensRights28/02/19 03:22 AM
7

The incels spilled over. We're seeing a lot more of this shit here. MGTOW was never as extreme as he put it. That's more incel take on it than I've ever seen.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 05:46 AM
1

The level of discussion in the comment section has also changed. A lot less civil discourse, and a lot more rally-round-the-flag regardless of facts and details.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 02:18 AM
10

I use dns66
/r/MensRights11/02/19 02:45 PM
15

That's the right answer actually.. https://youtu.be/I-vs8fwgwk0?t=106 https://youtu.be/0zret7O8YoU?t=29
/r/MensRights07/02/19 05:16 PM
14

Definitely a common issue, but I think that even bad examples of men are better than none at all. You get to see what could happen to you if you take the wrong path. Modern life limits a kid's interaction to basically just the immediate family. In the past there were lots of successful men who's dads were bad role models, but a distant cousin or or uncle was around enough to serve as a good role model and inspire them. I try to keep that in mind and force myself to interact with my friends' kids…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:08 PM
2

Great- now get that link out of here. Eventually someone on dataisbeautiful will put together a graph of all the subs linking abusive porn or mistreatment of women- I don't think we want this sub being represented there.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:52 PM
9

Well according to the BOP, 93.2% of prisoners are male and 6.8% are female. That's about a 14:1 ratio. Ignoring the harsher sentences men get for the same crimes, if we assume the justice system is equal, it's equally flawed as well. So this 14:1 ratio should apply to celemncy, pardons, and commuted sentences as well. That's where activism should be focused.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:10 AM
1

We're specifically talking about cases where a man wants to sign away his responsibilities by waiving parental rights, just like an abortion would do for a woman. That's literally what the topic is. Don't change the topic to pretend to have some moral high ground.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 06:18 AM
1

Hating is not any part of my logic. I don't see why a man should be given less time than a woman to make the same decision. If the only factor the woman needs to make her decision is whether or not she gets financial help, it means she's otherwise fine with bringing it to term. She'll still have the option of putting the baby up for adoption, or by the end of the pregnancy her financial situation may change.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 07:00 AM
10

Tbh it should be one month shorter. That would be equal. It's a big decision and men should have just as much time to think it over. Strong independent women shouldn't make their life decisions dependent on a man's decision, right? It's already enough that if a guy wants to keep the baby but the girl doesn't- it's getting aborted. He has no say.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 12:54 AM
169

Call it "paternal abortion" and ask for the same timeline that women get for choosing to abort. I had a pregnancy scare in college and I wasn't sure what the girl would do- so I actually put together a paternal abortion contract ;) I wish I still had a copy, but a lot of it was taken from adoption contacts where bio-parents give up their rights, but also receive a type of non-disclosure for privacy.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 06:58 PM
1

I always identify as such, because why not? It never hurts and sometimes helps. Do they really ask you if you identify as some LGBTQIAAPK+ status now? I've only seen race/ethnicity being asked, not gender/sexuality..
/r/MensRights29/11/18 05:58 AM
4

Doris!
/r/MensRights09/01/18 01:36 PM
1

I'm missing the similarity though. Doesn't preventing the boys from playing with Legos count as a negative punishment? They're not being unaffected by this teacher's policy. This is essentially about preventing one group with a natural affinity for a certain activity from doing that activity. The girls always had access to the Legos, so it's not giving them more of an advantage.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:34 AM
4

It would be really hard to illustrate it in a single snapshot... An actual comparison would be if there were two all-you-can-eat troughs, one for males and one for females, and the male trough got filled x% more through the course of a year. It would need to be understood that the male horses are worked harder and more expendable on the farm, and the females are more sheltered taken care of.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 12:27 PM
2

Southern NY judges are all cocky and loud. Plenty of senile ones too, because impeaching a judge is next to impossible. They decide when to quit.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 12:24 PM
3

Hell yeah she should be paid the same as Chris Rock, Dave Chapelle, and even Louis CK.... She is doing the exact same jokes they are.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:43 AM
4

They always use social manipulation to try to shame men into doing what the female experts want. That's why most relationship counselors are women. They come in, set their own rules, make you use their language, and play on their field. MGTOW is a huge threat to that system. It's realizing that the only winning move for a lot of men, is not to play the game. If enough men wise up and realize this lifestyle may be better for them, the entitlement bubble will eventually burst. Although these guys …
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:30 AM
1

I genuinely feel bad that girls of my generation weren't encouraged to play with them because they missed out. Be careful there. That assumption is not based on facts. These two ads are from 1978 and 1981 OK. Let's handicap the boys to ensure equality. Bullshit... When I was in school we had to read about Harrison Bergeron. I thought it was chilling but absurd. Now it doesn't seem so far-fetched.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 04:02 AM
1

Even though this was a British judge and the 14th amendment doesn't apply, it's still a common law system which depends on precedent... meaning that two wrongs inevitably do make a right.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 03:52 AM
1

They're too lazy to write anything beyond what's publicly available, and most of the time what's publicly available are just accusations by lawyers and judges that go on record. No defense lawyer is going to bother correcting the record on someone's drug use if it doesn't help his client. No matter how much of it is fabricated. They have to pick their battles. BTW I have no problem proving that I know her if it was necessary. I totally get the skepticism though. It's good to be skeptical.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 12:28 AM
7

I just found this article today, I'm surprised, but not shocked. No identifying info beyond what's in the article will be posted on here. The GF was a model for years. She used to even be the face of an clubbing website in NYC. About 10 years ago her career began a slow decline. Her BF knew her throughout that time. It was a little before they started going out. He was a big geek back then. I'm not saying that in the bad way, just that he was way less involved in drugs and more focused on produc…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 06:04 PM
5

Repeat offender too.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:32 PM
3

This is gonna be so bad if I get quoted out of context, but I have to make the logical conclusion.... So all non-murderous rapists should be given leniency by the judicial system for sparing their victims' lives? That's her logic basically.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:28 PM
5

Your comment history is almost completely negative vote counts. I know you think you're edgy, but you're not- you just don't bring anything of value to this site. Quit wasting your life.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:39 PM
5

TheGenocidalMachine has spoken: Logic has been served.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:19 AM
5

It doesn't make sense. He has money, it's protected by a pre-nup, she isn't holding his interest... why renegotiate and put it all on the line? She seems like a liar.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:15 AM
25

Survive literally comes from the latin term for out-living. It is supposed to be used for brushes with death. I'll probably get shit for sticking to the etymology, but even using it for sexual assault is kind of stretching it. Victims of sexual assault endure it; if there was an attempted murder, then they survived it.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:07 AM
96

"Well- he came back, that's the problem. He was supposed to be expendable and the ex-wife was supposed to be the beneficiary. PTSD? Does he cry about it? He must be gay. We can say that about him because we're women so it's not homophobic." -Every Oppressed TwoXer Ever
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:01 AM
1

It's really not a bad piece - and it's Slate, not Salon. Very different publication. You missed the last sentence in your first quote: "A correlation can't tell one from the other..." where "one from the other" refers to either a straight cause-and-effect relationship, or two effects that maybe the results of a shared cause. The latter is the "something else" referred to. We do know that zero correlation is evidence against causation, or any significant relationship. The opposite doesn't necessa…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:49 AM
-6

The Internet Blowhard’s Favorite Phrase - How the Internet fell in love with a stats-class cliché
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:42 PM
3

I wonder if the ~1% difference is even statistically significant. Vacation days are part of compensation, so it shouldn't matter if you take them or not... but men do take less sick and personal days. This is stupid of men though- a 1% salary advantage is not worth risking your health. "Presenteeism is much higher in men than women. They are much more likely to go into work while they are ill, which can have long term consequences - conditions can go undiagnosed, they not going to get early trea…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:33 PM
1

Well you did the right thing leaving. Sometimes people don't have other options and that could make it even worse. So at least you had that option. As for recording- consent depends on jurisdiction as others have mentioned, but ALSO has to do with expectation of privacy. If you are recording a face to face incident in an office setting where other people can walk by, there is no place in the US where you can't record it, barring classified work environments where there is a clear security policy…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:23 PM
1

No no- it was only a relationship. She merely abused her position of trust. She wasn't a pervy man about it.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:56 AM
8

Get your complaints documented at HR. If they don't do that, email your complaint to the higher ups. After that, try to record interactions. If you know a repeat offender is nearby, record just in case - either video or just audio, whatever you can. Enough documented proof will give you the upper hand. If they don't want to correct it, a good lawyer will make them correct it. You're being harassed, plain and simple. Setting you up for unsolicited dates is specifically sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 05:27 AM
1

Everyone should watch it in its actual context. Good thing you linked it.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:56 PM
2

I noticed that as well, but you know they allow these types of honest answers on other serious askreddit posts.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:20 PM
6

Same analogy: "If people are jailed for insurance fraud, it'll make people who already defrauded insurance companies less likely to confess it." It still sounds like crappy reasoning. If women are jailed for false accusation, and falsely accused men who prove their accuser lied can put them behind bars for decades, it'll deter false accusations. The one woman in ten thousand that has a change of heart is not enough to start a trend. We can't rely on them coming forward on their own. We need the …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:26 PM
52

I hate that reasoning. People who falsely accuse others and who's lies can be proven, should receive jail terms. Fearing that it might discourage real victims from coming forward is like saying "don't jail people for insurance fraud," because it might discourage legitimate insurance claims from being filed.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:32 AM
3

If there was a fire at the theater, you think they would refuse help from men and only accept the assistance of female firefighters and first responders?
/r/MensRights27/05/17 05:49 AM
2

There's plenty of privacy with urinals. I've been peeing all my life, many times in urinals, so I consider myself an expert. I've never seen anyone's penis at a urinal against my will, and no penis has invaded my privacy. I'm sure women may encounter exhibitionists, but that's as likely to happen on public transportation as it is in a bathroom.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 01:12 PM
2

It's definitely innate and the natural difference between men and women. My two daughters started helping to clean up as soon as they could walk. They like imitating the act of cleaning the house. The thing is- I don't exclusively buy them pink vacuum cleaner toys or play kitchen sets. They have ninja turtle costumes, John Deere trucks, rocketships, they play in the mud, I help them climb trees, all without forcing them in any way - they like that stuff. But they also naturally gravitate towards…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:36 AM
1

It sounds like you should seriously consider talking to someone. If you don't have access to a therapist, find a religious leader for whatever religion you follow, or a support group. There are suicidal elements in your writing tone and whether or not it's something you're conscious of, it's serious. Huge red flags. Please let someone help you.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 06:00 AM
17

The use of urinals in gender-neutral bathrooms should be covered by the same arguments supporting breastfeeding in public spaces. It's something natural, and you can choose not to look. Anyway, if I need to pee and there are lines for the stalls and no urinals, I'm going in the sink. Penn Jillette changed my perspective in the 90's when he pointed out that there's really no need to have both a urinal and a sink.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:46 AM
-5

But what about our safe space? Think of the feels... the feels! Edit: downvotes... I guess next time I have to make it clearer with "/s"
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:34 AM
4

There was recently a post on /r/legaladvice regarding a woman working for a company with a sustainability initiative. They removed the trash bins from the bathrooms and she got upset that she needs to throw out her tampons in the trash in the common space. I don't think men care about these things as much as women. They shame themselves into thinking we have some sort of expectation about not seeing or knowing about their periods. Then those restrictions they imagine to exist are used as a way f…
/r/MensRights26/05/17 05:19 AM
1

If she didn't have contact with the husband for 944 days and he was with the other 3 kids, it's safe to assume that she already abandoned those kids as well. She only took the 2 girls out of the 5 they have.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 03:51 AM
52

What a horrible sentence though. 15 days a year spread over six years? She kept those girls away from home for 3 years. If it was a man who was on trial, he would have been convicted of kidnap, not just parental alienation, with a much harsher sentence.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:13 PM
14

He accepted her decision but was not actively supportive. His other option would have been to speak up in which case she either would have stood her ground, or allowed him to change her mind. In the first scenario, the result would have been the same regardless. There would have still been a rift between them, but it would have included a lot more pointless arguing. In the second scenario, there would be the risk that she would be resentful of him, for having changed her mind, for the rest of he…
/r/MensRights18/05/17 05:26 AM
11

This has been circulating for about 4 years and seen as fake from day 1. I remember it was originally sourced from a Tumblr with a lot of these types of fake evidence screenshots.
/r/MensRights18/05/17 12:47 AM
29

"I'll be in my cubicle pumping breast milk if you need me. Good thing we fought for the right not to stigmatize something so natural." -token office feminist
/r/MensRights17/05/17 11:28 PM
10

No, feminists just hate men. All men. All feminists hate all men? Some feminists hate all men? Maybe some feminists hate some men? Not only is that sentiment tragically ironic, it doesn't advance MR in any way.
/r/MensRights16/05/17 05:44 AM
2

It's toxic masculinity. It seeps out and poisons the reader. Problem is- Harper Lee, Charlotte Bronte, Jane Austen, Sylvia Plath, et al., all grew up poisoned by masculinity. How can what they write about ever be pure and unaffected by all that? What these ladies need to find are female authors that grew up in a female only environment and never met a man. That will give them the most realistic world view.
/r/MensRights11/03/17 09:35 AM
38

When I was in fifth grade some girl attacked me, I don't remember why but I think she said something about my mom and I made fun of hers (I never picked on other kids, but I always had good comebacks). This happened while we were walking out to recess in a large group. Anyway, she squeezed my arm and dug her nails in. My instinctive reaction was to push her off. She went into a bush and had to be pulled out. I thought I would get shit for it, but actually got no punishment when they saw the claw…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:41 PM
1

Muslims do it for the same reason Jews do it. It was Abraham's covenant with god. In the Jewish texts he goes to sacrifice his son Isaac, but an angel stops him at the last moment and tells him god was just testing him and wasn't serious, but he has to chop his son's and his own foreskin. Isaac was 8 days old, so Jews do this at 8 days of age. Muslims have the same story, but the sacrifice was Ismail (or Ishmael) the older son born to the Arab mistress/maid. He was 13 years old so Muslims are su…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 06:39 AM
0

Reading comprehension. Get some. 2 year prolonged rape festival Where did it say that? She was raped 2 years ago is what it says. There was a period of bullying that led up to that event. This really seems like it may have been that she was slow to report it, but the article doesn't really give any reason to doubt her.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 07:16 AM
2

I was hoping the journey to the all-father would lead nowhere, and each boy learned that the journey- that struggling and searching perpetually, was what brought out the all-father hidden in their genes. Struggle unlocks your potential. TRP is a truth uncovered by each person individually. Not a movement that's spread like feminism. Truth is like science, it's descriptive and not prescriptive. Even if you want to be an RPer and understand it intellectually but not instinctively, you'll fail. It …
/r/TheRedPill06/02/17 03:11 PM
3

I do agree with it as long as a father's right to terminate is independent of and is given equal weight as the mother's right to terminate. But a woman's right to choose in most cases implies that she is free to choose to carry to term and receive child support from a man until the child is an adult, contrary to the unwilling father's decision to terminate.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 01:51 AM
6

Fan fact- whenever I see/hear them mention the Patriarchy, I change it in my head to the Illuminati. It makes about as much sense in that argument.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:04 PM
1

Most females in the IDF are administrative. Some do get roles in combat units, but mostly as trainers and officers. The male brain responds to females commands with a quicker reaction time- that's why it's used with heads-up-displays, in the US military at least. IDF females don't make it to the highest ranks though, and this is in a country that had a female prime minister, executive roles are filled equally by men and women, more women enroll in higher education than men, so it's not out of pl…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:01 PM
1

Yea- there are some feminists who supported conscription, but you've never seen it an issue raised at gatherings and protests. The pacifist feminists who didn't agree with it chose a good time to compromise on equality and put their pacifist values first. I'm not saying they should support war or violence, but that the agenda should be to have equal rights and responsibilities everywhere while in parallel pursuing a reduction of the military. It's a convenient rationalization- saying you don't s…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 01:53 PM
166

...but women weren't allowed to do xyz... Why don't women march for those rights in those demonstrations? Why is showing your tits more important for a feminist cause than demanding the right to carry your own weight in every aspect of society, including fighting in combat?
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:26 AM
1

I've had more women fall asleep leaning on me than men. Total strangers on a plane. It can get really annoying.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 07:39 AM
7

I had one of those unsolicited solicitors knock on my door and try to sell me crappy magazines for insane prices. His reason was basically what you said.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 03:49 PM
2

I don't know who you think is a kid, but you probably need to believe that to convince yourself you don't sound like a dolt. If you didn't eat for 3 days, you probably did it as a choice, going by the way you describe it. If by the 3rd day you weren't feeling the hunger, you were lying to yourself to prove you can tough it out. It might have worked, but you felt the hunger. Even if you eat every day but are underfed - you do not stop thinking about food. You have no idea what you're talking abou…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 08:32 PM
6

I hope you never face real starvation- 3+ days with no food. Actual starvation is like a fire inside you. It drives you to do whatever the fuck you need to do to survive, and you can't think about anything other than food- not even women. That's why actual starving people either become junkies and numb themselves, or become shameless thieves. Homeless shelters are meant to placate this by giving the bare minimum to keep people from starving. The exceptions to the rule usually become very success…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/17 04:53 PM
8

The Daily Mail has really shitty memory. Women are much less likely to admit the truth even when their explanation is not rational
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:22 AM
20

Someone posted it anonymously and linked the article. I don't think it was her using 4chan, it was just some posting it under a provocative title to get views.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/16 02:52 AM
13

There was also an article a little while back that said while women say seeing men doing chores turns them on, men who do housework are less likely to get sex. Edit: found one article - it's not the one I was thinking of, but there were plenty of results.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 07:26 PM
1

Relevant username?
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:50 AM
12

There are a lot of morons who think that everything is one way or another. That's the real beta mentality: "if I am able to label things, then I can just prescribe how the world works according to those labels" This is the underlying cause of betas thinking that if they check boxes off a list they will become successful in their careers or with women. They have the world worked out into categories and reality has to submit to their explanation of reality. With people's reactions to Jews they see…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/16 12:45 AM
11

Whites own everything, didn't you know? If you're white and don't need have property or a business, just write a letter the European descent organization and they'll hook you up.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:56 AM
6

First- great play by play commentary. Second- I may offend some people here, but I've always viewed the SO's of sex workers as beta chumps. They might be great guys, nice and all, but I feel more sorry for them than any actual respect. No problem with sex workers who do it by choice, neither male nor female - no judgements, but trying to normalize it as "just a job" is stupid. They are choosing a lifestyle, not just a job. That lifestyle affects relationships in the present and in the future, ev…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 05:58 AM
1

Just do something about it. All your comments are about how wrong it was, how no one helped you, and how you think reporting her would be too much. You sound like a girl from the 50's. Just venting about it is pointless. In fact, not doing anything about it will disappoint any real MRA. It's you responsibility to go and do something about it. Put the complaint in writing with the school at the very least.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:30 PM
26

I wouldn't pick sides without facts. I've known too many mixed ethnic couples where the man is Arab and the woman is western and to put it lightly, there is a culture clash. A lot of traditional Arab guys are aggressive at home. You can downvote me to shit, but that's been my experience.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 12:36 AM
3

You can compare any country to Saudi Arabia and it'll come out as less oppressive. Probably Sudan even. That's not a high standard to hold yourself to.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/16 12:32 AM
2

Relevant Oglaf NSFW
/r/MensRights17/07/16 05:57 AM
10

As a straight guy I've always pointed this out to my gay friends/acquaintances. I never thought it's cute when women sought out gay guys to hang out with just to make themselves feel cool. The thing is though that some gay guys are so feminine that they prefer the company of women regardless of how shallow their relationships are with those women. But there are really masculine gay guys who have more freedom to not give a fuck than any straight male. Those guys soar. They make heterosexuality se…
/r/MensRights17/07/16 02:21 AM
10

Belief in the justice system is funny as hell. If you ever see it in action, you'll lose any respect for it. A prosecutor can suppress almost any evidence before a trial even starts with pre-trial motions. The most experienced ones know exactly what each judge needs to hear to make that call. The judges themselves have all the power, but don't even care about the cases, they have their clerks do the majority of the work. The rate of getting a "not guilty" verdict on a felony in front of a jury i…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 06:07 AM
14

Confident sluts are fun, but this one thinks she's being judged all around. She's being reactive more than active by doing stuff just to shock people around her. Also- the little set of rules she made up for herself are a dumb way of rationalizing her behavior to herself. Of she was totally confident in her own skin, penetrative sex would not be off the table, but she has some deep rooted resistance to that which signals that she might not really be comfortable with what she's doing. She's pushi…
/r/MensRights29/05/16 02:32 PM
1

Females of all vertebrates are evolved to sense differences in males. I forget the source, but it was discussed in a documentary... For example, there are birds that do dances or deer that grow antlers, and to us it all seems the same but the females of their species can distinguish among them. In human males, the biggest differentiator is the brain. The theory they proposed was that human females developed a "well-rounded" brain because the only way to tell if someone is creative or smart is to…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/16 12:45 PM
1

And how many 12 year olds are running it?
/r/MensRights07/05/16 02:50 PM
1

A cloud of rain = rain cloud A sled of dogs = dog sled So why is the term "person of color" the PC term, but "colored person" completely off-color? (pun intended)
/r/MensRights19/04/16 12:18 PM
5

It never did work, but people thought it would go away on its own. Now we have more and more people speaking up against that fascist mentality.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:11 AM
1

With CPS and the healthcare system I was saying that it's bad excuses. I'm just wondering if this playground was in the middle of nowhere or if people in her neighborhood just don't give a shit about each other enough to break out of their shell. As for the rest of it, you really can't compare with different cases. Just cause one guy got a harsh sentence doesn't mean leniency isn't justified in this case. They all deserve help. It's not like she snapped and went violent, she was in a trance for …
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:55 AM
2

This is more a mental health issue, not a gender based issue. If 3 experts already analyzed her and all came to a consensus, that she was not responsible, I doubt any rationalizing on the internet is going to be convincing enough to prove she got off because she's a woman. Regarding the custody issue- you have no idea how the dad is. He may have been completely incompetent. You can blame CPS and the healthcare system (or lack of it) but where the hell are the decent neighbors who should have not…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:36 PM
4

Switzerland- Maternity leave: 14 weeks with 80% pay Paternity leave: zippo, nada, zilch Retirement women: 64 Retirement men: 65 Life expectancy women born mid-80's: 80 Life expectancy men born mid-80's: 73 (So Swiss women live off of their pension twice as long as men on average) And even though men and women pay the same for the subsidized health insurance in Switzerland, women are much more likely to suffer injuries such as broken bones, and they consume more end-of-life care because they are …
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:24 PM
406

...and if he doesn't pay child support he's also a criminal.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:55 AM
2

I hold doors open for everyone, but women who act like it's expected and avoid saying thanks, or don't acknowledge that a person is helping them, get the door closed on them. I held the door for a few old veterans the other day and they were happier and more appreciative than any woman I've seen in a long time. Many women think that if they give anything other than the dead zombie glazed eyes, guys will turn into horny rape monkeys.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:28 AM
18

I always cite sanitation when I hear arguments about how women get paid less or don't have the same opportunities. If women really cared about equality, they'd work in sanitation. The pay can be good and most of the time the shift is done early in the afternoon so you don't have to miss out seeing your kids after school like with office jobs. Instead, they choose to invoke their right to be homemakers if "cleaner" jobs are not available. It's like physical labor is something they can pick and ch…
/r/MensRights02/02/16 01:30 PM
4

I was thinking that the entire article. Why do they keep doing that whenever the article is about female attackers? Same thing happened with the psycho I'm Vegas who ran over people on purpose.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:44 AM
-12

Women do not have a need to make sense. Men are handicapped when forming opinions because of their need for consistency and logic.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:50 PM
2

The only case where someone's name is withheld is when they're the victims of rape. It's a privilege due to the delicate nature of the situation. If an accuser can't make a credible case despite the fact that 2 people should be able to support her claims (the roommate and the driver) then that privilege becomes a shield from the consequences of perjury. If there is no evidence to support her claim, she should be named and held accountable. It's not a punishment, just equal treatment.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 06:43 AM
35

Completely agree- it seems like some editor published this out of obligation only and wasn't compelled to actually report any substance. They also made it seem like the charges just disappeared- no mention if the story didn't add up or if she recanted.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:18 PM
1

One of the most accurate ways of putting it was in the movie Syriana - "you're innocent until indicted."
/r/MensRights05/11/15 01:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter