TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bobbyjets Archive

View 0 posts and 105 comments by Bobbyjets on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Flamed 🔥
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 07:36 PM
2

That's a horrible take. Your view on other countries is not only pretentious but horribly skewed and steeped in bias
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 04:05 PM
1

As I have stated, the age of the man is irrelevant, as the younger woman will always be more desirable. You clearly don't understand the purpose, goals, or theories of TRP. You'll want to read the sidebar if you want to make an actual argument against it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 02:13 PM
1

No, you said a 27 year old woman is more desirable when it comes to marriages than a 20 year old woman. No man was mentioned in this comparison, and this is the topic you're mistaken on. Regardless of where you're from, Leonardo is someone with incredible financial standing which is inherently highly valuable. Suggesting that him getting with you would be him "marrying up" sounds ludicrous unless you were rated sexiest woman in your country, stand to inherit a large fortune (incredibly large), o…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 01:20 PM
1

This entire thread you've been trying to say that a 27 year old woman is more desirable for marriage than a 20 year old woman to men 30+. So not only are you brutally incorrect, but you forgot your own point?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:50 PM
2

Right, because everyone knows that social media sites are where you find accurate information. As long as you're in a position to provide for them no one is worried about "taking care" of a young woman. Look at the most successful and most attractive men in the world and who they choose to date/marry after they've become big. It's different if they were together before the marriage, but in the majority of cases a decade or more younger isn't an issue, but preferable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 05:30 PM
2

I live in Canada, and you are way off base. It sounds as though you're getting old, and searching desperately for studies that confirm what you hope to be true. Your confirmation bias is going to be your own worst enemy, because instead of desperately searching for someone now or bettering yourself starting from now you are going to steadily lose value until it's too late. You can tell yourself whatever you want, but no man that I've ever met preferred a woman who was 7+ years older unless they …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 05:24 PM
1

You're wrong about that. I suggest you read the entire sidebar before making assumptions about what it says
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 04:23 PM
1

That's incorrect. When it comes to: casual hook ups, marriage, relationships, any other partnership, a 20 year old woman is much more appealing to the majority of men than a 27 year old woman. Someone from a lower socioeconomic background would be more likely to go for a woman with an established career, but even in this case they see more likely to go for the 20 year old Believing anything else is kidding yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 04:20 PM
1

Our society overinflates the value of female beauty. This is what I mean. A large part of women's value is based on looks. The value that their looks actually hold is less than they'd think in most cases. Not because they think they look better than they do, but because there is much less value in looks to begin with. As much as it is valuable, it doesn't bring much actual worth to the table. They overinflate their value because they often think that looks are truly valuable, while instead looks…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 03:31 PM
2

You think there is an increase in value as women approach 27? If that's the case, I would love to hear why you think that, as it's drastically untrue. From age 21 value decreases, after 30 it decreases more dramatically, after 40 even more dramatically. Once a woman passes 50 it's unlikely to drop much more until they're frail and dying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 03:24 PM
1

Why does what matter to women? The value of women's looks has been overinflated by society in comparison to men's. So much so that a beautiful woman is seen as having more value than a much more attractive man of the same financial standing. I never suggested this is only a problem caused by women, I mentioned society as a whole. Once again, you are confusing self confidence of looks with self confidence of worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 12:03 PM
1

Talking in definites while meaning averages is misleading. Using the term "unrepresentative minority" to refer to a large portion of the group you're talking about is disingenuous
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 11:57 AM
1

27 compared to 20 is still a significant difference, but it the decline definitely picks up after 30
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 11:53 AM
0

I think your view on this is fundamentally flawed. It becomes more difficult for women to date as they age while it becomes easier for men. Sure there are less people approaching older women for casual sex, but there are also less people approaching them in general. This is a fundamental belief of TRP, so I think the amount of people crying about missing out on their stud phase is much lower than you believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:43 AM
2

You said it definitely doesn't mean the woman overestimated her looks. This isn't the case as it's common for women to overestimate their looks as well, it just isn't as common as men. It makes sense to talk about a large portion of women when you suggest that there isn't a portion of women who overestimate their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:36 AM
2

Men care more about looks, but it isn't as though that's all women have to offer. Similar to how women care more about financial standing and confidence, but that isn't all men have to offer. I think you're confusing TRP's outlook on how society has inflated the worth of women over men when it comes to looks vs your interpretation that this means TRP thinks women personally overestimate their looks. Also, TRP is inherently anti marriage, as it serves next to no value for a man except for early o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:31 AM
2

It isn't necessarily the case that the woman has an inflated sense of self confidence, but it certainly can be. While women are less likely to overestimate their looks, that doesn't mean it's uncommon
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:25 AM
1

I said also. What you said is one of the reasons, but it certainly isn't the only reason. If he doesn't approach nothing is lost and nothing is gained. If he does approach there is a possibility of bad and also a possibility of good. It is completely dependent on the individual which is worse. TRP does argue that women have an inflated sense of worth, it doesn't argue that they have an inflated sense of how attractive they are. Those are two different beliefs. Women will often think that their b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:18 AM
3

What you said isn't wrong but I hope you realize this goes the same for women
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:10 AM
1

Women also don't give as many compliments because in many cases they don't have to chase. The less attractive they are, the more likely they are to give compliments. The risk of rejection in many men's minds is much worse than the case of missed opportunity. In missed opportunity, nothing changes - no risk, no possible reward. In rejection, there is a possibility of being embarrassed/insulted but also the possibility of being accepted - risk, and possible reward. Most of what you're talking abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 10:02 AM
2

A woman rejecting a man doesn't mean he's below her league, it merely means she wasn't interested. Same goes for when a woman approaches a man. On the same note, if the woman accepts them it doesn't mean he is in the same league or higher. Your comment referring to ugly men in relationships with attractive women highlight this point There are many reasons for rejection, general attractiveness is only one factor
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 09:54 AM
1

Women, perhaps I should've specified
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 08:28 AM
13

Edit: *Women are more likely to underestimate their attractiveness as well. This seems like a poor point psychology today made when it comes to self insight between the genders The point op made was interesting though
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 07:10 AM
8

Everyone feels love, it's just whether the situation happens or not. It's tough to believe in true love when you've been invested while your partner wasn't. Even tougher when you find out that you don't have to be invested for them to love you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 09:51 AM
4

In my case I never really felt like that. There were questionable comments made by adult women but I never thought much of it. There are certainly boys who get sexually harassed but I would assume the number is similar to the amount of girls who didn't get sexually harassed
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/22 04:56 PM
1

Attractive, supportive, loyal, intelligent, financially sound. I would say in that order
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 07:40 AM
4

Body hair preferences have changed drastically for men already in a couple generations. Skin and hair care products for men have become commonplace rather than a rarity. Expensive hairstyles for men have become much more common. These are things that have changed, but there are only more products and ideals being sold to men, not less. Beauty companies have benefited greatly off of this, and certainly had a hand in bringing it about
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 11:01 AM
3

You're saying this as though it's away at a boarding school til adulthood rather than part of the day until they can watch themselves. People taking care of your child is not the same as raising them
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 03:41 PM
1

Definitely not stupid, it all depends on what you're after
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 01:27 PM
7

If you wanted to have as many children as possible you'd want to have as much unprotected sex as possible. If you're planning on raising them as well, either you or a partner would need the finances to do it. Either way, wouldn't recommend
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/22 06:54 PM
1

This sub isn't toxic at all. What you have are a minority of the population discussing their personal experiences. For better or for worse, you learn how some people view the world. You can use that knowledge, or you can ignore it. It absolutely shouldn't make you toxic, if it is you should ignore it or try to read it in a different light
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/22 02:26 PM
3

This is a fringe subreddit on the internet, it is not representative of the population or their views
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 01:14 AM
4

Part of it could be that widowed women have a tougher time finding partners, although I haven't read any studies on it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:13 PM
5

Fuck sakes lol, there are plenty of women who love math. I figure most people in general don't wanna do math though
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 08:53 AM
2

Did they have to watch/ look at something while you guys were intimate? If not, you were the reason they were aroused, in almost all cases that's because they find you attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 04:40 PM
2

They could be not interested in a relationship and insult you but they probably find you attractive. Perhaps not as attractive as they would want for an LTR but most wouldn't be interested even in a casual relationship if you weren't attractive to them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 03:23 PM
1

I would say in both situations most men would prefer hot women, but they would settle more often for casual relationships than LTRs
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 03:17 PM
1

I like the idea of ideological trades lol, although I don't figure it's something that will catch on
/r/MensRights05/07/22 07:39 AM
3

It's definitely possible to get into a loving relationship without worrying about the topics discussed in this sub. This sub discusses the base desires and motivation that the majority of people have, it certainly isn't the place to find out about successful long term relationships. Not everyone is controlled by their base desires and not everyone has the same base desires. The majority of what you would learn on this sub many people already understand, and the rest can be learned from experienc…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 06:08 AM
1

Humans have an inherent right to life whether they are sentient or not. Outside of conception, the lines that are drawn are arbitrary
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:55 PM
3

I would argue at conception as that's when by all definitions of human and alive it would be classified as human life. The line can be arbitrarily assigned wherever else but that is the moment it becomes human life
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:33 AM
2

About 50/50 I figure, but they rarely sparked. Could've been I didn't know what to do, could've been I was the only one feeling it. I think sexual tension is much more common than people acting on it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:28 AM
3

Just wanted to say that this subreddit has gotten a lot more civil than when I first joined. I had been off reddit a few years and the difference was shocking. Congratulations to the mods and the members of this community, you guys deserve it 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 10:26 AM
2

I think it's due to a belief that men already have all their rights therefore they can only take more from women. Could be extremists people cherry pick in order to generalize entire groups. I wouldn't know though, I've never labeled it as such and think it's about time we have men's interest groups. I figure that men fighting for more rights scares the lobby groups that already exist
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:10 AM
2

I mean, there is no wage gap but bills should certainly be alternating or split. The breadwinner roles are dated and don't reflect how many more working women we have now
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 09:39 AM
2

I'm sorry to hear that, there are lots of people not worth the time in this world, and getting a mental health professional is a great way to help you deal with it. Remember that people love and care about you, especially on days when it seems hardest to. I'm rooting for you buddy 👍
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:44 AM
3

I beg to differ. The idea of love and trust have always been romanticized without considering base biological instinct. The red pill was a sub where people challenged that notion with their personal experiences. As disappointing as it was finding out, the majority of what I learned in that sub rang true in my own experience. There was also the rampant misogyny and incel behavior that you had to be able to recognize and skip over, but it was astounding how much applicable knowledge you could find…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:38 AM
29

Then they would have paid maternity leave, the military isn't a bad job but it's never as enticing when you're forced into it
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:42 AM
5

"In or on another species", that means if it's a human child being supported by its human mother, it doesn't fit the definition of parasite. Of course whether definitions are made up by pro- choice people or actually true doesn't really matter to them. Since Roe vs Wade was overturned I've seen people say they aren't children, aren't human, and even not alive lol
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:40 AM
1

You're actually incorrect with the conclusions you're drawing. They state that attractiveness increased these women's ability to aquire jobs, however what this study doesn't do is measure how many unattractive people didn't get jobs just because they're unattractive. I already stated that attractive women stand the most to gain from this system and all your surveys did was prove that point. As for unattractive women having it harder than unattractive men, none of the stats given in those links w…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/19 08:14 PM
2

No, I would say that there is as much possibility it works the other way. Certainly with affirmative action in place scaling is easier for unattractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 06:34 PM
3

I wouldn't say they get looked down on at all if they have the accomplishments. It's just even easier for attractive or tall people to scale the ladder, it's less being looked down on so much as overlooked, and it affects all genders, with attractive women having the most to gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/19 08:54 PM
1

No I haven't yet, just using it to lean up. I can't speak from experience how effective it would be during a bulk.
/r/askTRP11/02/19 09:00 PM
1

We'd need to know about the fight
/r/askTRP11/02/19 07:48 AM
9

The best results I've gotten is from keto. Not only will you be eating more protein for muscle, but by upping your fat intake your body will become used to burning it, raising metabolism.
/r/askTRP11/02/19 12:07 AM
1

Helot children would never have been raised in Spartan society, as they were seen as an inferior breed. Slaves were slaves, and not considered members of society, both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 01:03 AM
1

It's also really easy to not include any women as citizens of the state, but they did include their Spartan women, and gave them rights equal to or greater than the Spartan men. How non-citizens are treated wouldn't be a gendered statistic, as they had no rights in any society
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 01:01 AM
1

Why would I include slaves. The slave class isn't at all representative of how they viewed women or men, as both were property and of no value. The Spartan females were leagues above the slave class for rights, and these are the people being considered. Other aspects are much less important in showing how women were treated compared to men. However, if we do want to go down this path, you'll lose again. Women were the desired sex, and it would be the men who had to impress them. Men would sneak …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 10:15 PM
1

Bringing up Athens vs Sparta would actually do damage to your hypotheses. In Sparta women had much more authority and freedom than in Athens. Athenian women weren't allowed to vote, weren't allowed represent themselves in court, couldn't hold public office, had a max they were allowed to spend in the market, and had huge restrictions on property ownership In Sparta it was very different, women were the landowners, they were responsible for the household and it's possessions most of the time, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/18 06:35 AM
1

I don't know if the political divide is necessarily taken into account, but it definitely has a lot to do with how you think of the person
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:25 PM
1

They weren't coquered by an inferior force because their society was equal. Even suggesting that is ludicrous. Darius III was one of the worst strategists Persia ever had, with Alexander the Great arguably being the best strategist from the ancient world. The Mongols treated their women as equals, with Mongol women having better standing than non-mongol men within their entire empire while it lasted. The Iroquois tribe had one of the strongest and most effective armies in early North America and…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 08:01 PM
1

No, I'm saying that inequality isn't dependant on how prosperous a society is
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/18 12:39 AM
1

The entire history, ending with Alexander's conquer. The society was legendary for its treatment of the lower class and women
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 09:45 PM
1

Prosperity increases inequality, but it isn't necessary for inequality to occur. Look at the middle East right now, that's extreme prosperity? Pretty sure Somalia isn't nearly as equal between the sexes as it was when they were prosperous.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 07:41 PM
1

Yeah man your point is a crock of shit, certainly prosperity increases inequality, but it is often that a lack of prosperity leads to inequality as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 07:38 PM
3

You're right for the most part about why these laws were put into place, however, there are many other systems than feudalism that could have worked effectively. The Iroquois are an example of this. The women were in charge of government and decision making, while men were almost exclusively engaged in hunting and war. Unfortunately though, there were extremely lower numbers of Iroquois, thanks to other tribes waging war and wiping out villages while the men are out. So as much as an absolute de…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/18 07:33 PM
1

Anti-conctraception falls under the same scripture as masterbation, in no way can you blame how people practice sex for the spread of aids. If you really want to look at it that way though, you could blame atheists for the STD epidemics by them preaching that having sex out of wedlock isn't an issue. This would have significantly more impact than Christians not using condoms. Your second point, holy hell, not going to dignify it with an actual response. You're just brutal when it comes to this p…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 10:22 PM
6

That's a good one, thanks
/r/askTRP07/12/18 08:30 PM
1

Yes, but they have a much smaller platform than other groups in the West that they are fighting. There wouldn't be much use in trying to stamp out Islam in the West because it isn't a large issue here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 08:10 PM
1

Excellently put, you can't and shouldn't wage war on an ideology, especially when it is not the entirety of Muslims practicing the issues you would want to wage war against.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 08:08 PM
3

See, the difference is, spreading aids and having sex with children isn't a belief of Christianity, that's just something that happens because shitty people happen. Certain Muslim groups believe that these horrible things should happen. A better example than the Catholic Church for an example would be the KKK, who are in much smaller minority than Muslims who practice Sharia law.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 08:04 PM
1

I didn't change my comment at all. A plate is a term used to describe a woman who isn't supposed to be sleeping with other men, while the man she sleeps with doesn't have the same rule. It's not that the woman doesn't expect commitment, it's that the man isn't willing to give it. I gave a possible reason for this situation to occur, they do describe different things, because one is the definition of a plate and one is my interpretation of why a woman might do that. Fairly simple to follow I thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 06:07 AM
1

Regardless of if it's a fantasy or not that's the proper definition. The pseudoscience written in trp draws the conclusion that women always have a nagging desire to upgrade, if the women feels she is unable to upgrade past a particular guy, her increased attraction and fear of losing him could cause her to agree to a non-mutually exclusive relationship. That's what I figure anyways, there's plenty of articles describing the hypotheses behind it if you want to try to understand it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/18 12:49 AM
4

Plates the wrong term to use, a plate is expected to be only fucking the one guy, while the guy fucks whoever. You're thinking of friends with benefits/fuck buddy kinda deal. But I found your first paragraph really insightful, I never thought about how it could be the strong majority of women debating these topics aren't party girls. I always figured the selection would be pretty random but debating pseudoscience isn't really typical niche
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 04:34 PM
1

As a man I've always enjoyed any attention from my significant other when we're in person. For me there's nothing better than knowing my girl wants to spend time with me. If we weren't together though a few messages or a call per day would be nice
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/18 04:22 PM
1

Oh haha, obviously we weren't even arguing the same thing. My bad, take care
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/18 03:57 AM
3

Me personally, I've never been as attracted to women who always give me the time of day as women who might pretend not to have noticed me. I figure it's that whole you want what you can't have kind of thing, the added difficulty makes it that much more enticing. I'd assume that the switch from 9s to 7s has something to do with wisdom. Realizing that having someone you can count on is a lot more important than if they drop your jaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 11:07 PM
1

What? I never acknowledged that because there isn't a good reason for ignoring someone (purposefully), unless they have done something to earn that response. Obviously one action isn't character defining, what is character defining is how you consistently act. I find it very odd that anyone would argue that ignoring people isn't rude, but whatever. Best of luck to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:52 PM
1

Hah, it's incredibly commonplace in any situation where men are approaching women, if you think otherwise you should get out more. Yes, it's not nuclear rejection you were talking about, like I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 10:45 PM
1

I'd agree, the way he worded it was false.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:32 PM
1

"> I mean what is it that’s being done rude? To give an example they might get a polite rejection if they ask a woman out, but then that woman turns around and tells her friends something like, "can you believe that loser thought I would go on a date with him"." This was the comment, and you said "yeah that doesn't happen nearly as often as you think" Your comment was probably wrong, unless the original commenter thought it happened 100% of the time
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:31 PM
1

Regardless of whether people are shitty or not, ignoring people is shitty. If you disagree I guess you disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 06:29 PM
3

Supposedly that is how the law should work. I wasn't saying the laws are different for gender, just explaining what OP was talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:45 PM
5

Why men are pursued with rape charges for fucking drunk women and women fucking drunk men aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:23 PM
1

Holy. That's exactly what we're talking about! The thing that you wouldn't consider a nuclear rejection that you said doesn't happen nearly as often as was assumed. I told you that you are wrong, as I've consistently seen this happen at least once. It might not be a given thing for EVERY woman, just like not ALL men get rejected, but for ugly guys approaching attractive women, a situation like the one mentioned above is certain. Not to mention I said it wasn't nuclear rejection, because I was pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:15 PM
1

"enough" would be the majority, shitty actions > non-shitty actions = shitty. Not a difficult concept. Besides that, where did I say that a random stranger is the judge of everyone who doesn't say hi to them. No one's going to keep accurate track of whether you're a shitty person, that doesn't mean you aren't one.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:10 PM
1

I have fully understood your point. You obviously can't comprehend what you're trying to insinuate about a large group of people. Your assumption that they are incorrect, and that they only assume out of lack of exposure doesn't change your base point, it changes what caused it. Regardless, you have no evidence to prove they are incorrect nor that they don't talk to women in public. So I can also say that anti-redpillers are incorrect and assume out of lack of exposure. There you go, now it's th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:06 PM
0

Are you reading your own comment? All 3 of your points are going over different ways in which "manospherians" make assumptions about women they haven't met. 1) you say "manospherians" assume women treat unattractive, rude people the same way in person as online. 2) you say "manospherians" assume that women treat their valued men the same as people they argue online with. 3) you say "manospherians" assume that women agree with clickbait articles because they don't socialize with women offline. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:32 AM
1

You said that situations where a woman turns to her friend after a rejection and says something like: "can you believe that loser thought I would go on a date with him" doesn't happen nearly as often as the commenter thought. That definitely isn't a nuclear rejection, and isn't at all exceptionally rare. If you truly think that rejections like that aren't common, if not probable, you have no clue what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:19 AM
1

No, but that's the line between a shitty action and a non-shitty action. You do enough of them, and behold, you're a shitty person.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/18 04:13 AM
2

Actually that was all 3 of your points. 3 different ways in which "manospherians" draw false conclusions about people they haven't met. I can't believe that when presented with your own argument, even you can't agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 09:19 PM
1

Nothing is a requirement. But if you don't want to be a shitty person, common courtesy is a pretty standard requirement. A head nod would work as well, but ignoring someone is inarguably a shitty thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 09:16 PM
2

Hey buddy, about 9/10 men that make a pass on a woman in the bar is going to get a blatantly rude remark to send them away. The 10th one she goes home with. If you go to any club with a group of girls you will see a rejection like that every 5 minutes. Of course, a rejection like that is bad, but not terrible. At least once a night you should see a guy get torn apart for his attempt, like last week when I saw a girl guffaw at a man's dancing until he became sad and left.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 09:13 PM
1

I know that's your premise. You should've been able to notice that you blew a hole in your argument without me pointing it out. You saying that it's different is just putting you further in the hole. The people you are assuming have never talked to women and believe all women "do this irl", are either non-existent like you say the anti-redpill counterpart is. Or the anti-redpill counterpart has the capability for the exact same ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 09:07 PM
1

Do you think the people posting these articles don't interact with any women? Do you really think they believe these women treat every man the same way they do to specific people online? If you do, then why would you think that it isn't related? Your topic, flipped to talk about the anti-redpillers instead of the "manospherians".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 10:21 AM
1

With common decency, if you're addressed, you answer. If you don't want to continue talking to them, you tell them that you aren't interested. Ignoring people is horribly rude, and could certainly be referred to as "treating someone like garbage".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 10:07 AM
3

If someone approaches you, addresses you, and then you ignore them, that's fucking rude. I'm not sure what kind of people you know, but just about everyone I see on a daily basis will smile or say hi if they've been addressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 10:00 AM
0

Of course there's a neutral, that would be called common decency.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/18 09:57 AM
1

Oh okay lol
/r/askTRP26/11/18 06:45 AM
2

If you think women don't do that, you're probably the perfect person to answer his question.
/r/askTRP26/11/18 12:51 AM
7

Find hobbies, lifting, running, biking, longboarding, gardening
/r/askTRP13/09/18 05:09 AM
3

Yeah bro, she was giving you a shit test. Next time don't let it get in your head
/r/askTRP09/06/18 03:28 AM
1

I assume most of it wouldn't work, as the advice is given based on either the illogical mind of a woman, or the logical mind of a man. Based on my personal experience I've found that gay guys could have either mind, even switch between the two. I would say you would need an entirely different community to draw knowledge from.
/r/askTRP30/05/18 01:33 AM
4

I don't understand what you mean by anger phase, but meeting people at the gym is probably easier than most places. Almost every guy inside a gym would enjoy teaching you about the workout they're doing, how to do the exercise they're doing, or where they got their training supplies. If you see a guy who has massive triceps, and your exercises aren't quite cutting it, ask him what his routine is. Depending on how he responds it should be easy to tell whether or not he'd hang out with you. Say th…
/r/askTRP19/05/18 01:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter