| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingnah dude shitposting is real fun give it a try some time | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 11:35 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingok | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 11:09 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingYou're under the impression I clicked those arrows. I didn't. You are allowed to comment in linked threads. Sorry, you lose again. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 04:25 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingok | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 06:34 AM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingno, see, that's not a caricature | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 05:00 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingwell yeah, you set me up a pristine example of one | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 03:57 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingcontinue believing whatever makes you happy, doesn't actually change the reality of the situation. i know what i believe, you don't, you kicking a strawman in the dick doesn't impress anyone. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 02:48 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingi mean if your only argument is "hurr durr i dont see it so it don't real" like an infant who hasn't learned object permanence yet, then sure. thanks for confirming i don't need to bother with you. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 02:38 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingoh, right, because if i don't whine about it on reddit i clearly don't care lmfao you can't be that dense | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 02:27 AM |
| -6 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingplease, for the class, spell out the time i did that are you going to pretend this comment is the only one i've ever made? like i know your arguments are flimsy at best but come on you have to be capable of better than that | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 02:00 AM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingyou're right, it's not a game, stop treating it like one. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 01:49 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingif shouting insults makes you feel better about what you're doing here then go for it I guess | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 01:03 AM |
| -10 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingif only that's what you did | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 12:50 AM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingit's almost like this comment chain was posted in /r/againstmensrights, a sub im subscribed to, and i followed the link, and the timing was a coincidence. take off your tinfoil hat, jesus christ. no one is stalking you for your political views on the internet. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 12:38 AM |
| -10 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingoh man are you the one who claimed SRS made a fake tax return in your name because someone made an account with your email address, or, more than likely, you forgot your own password? the one who didn't even have any reason to believe it was SRS, you're just that scared of people on the internet who don't find LE ATAK HELICHOPPER funny? lmao the claims of doxxing because we laugh at how ridiculous this entire sub is were funny enough but goddamn dude | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 12:20 AM |
| 1 | Sex and valueOkay, so being legitimately confused by a stupid question and trying to understand what your point is is "white knighting", got it. /eyeroll | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/05/15 06:49 PM |
| 2 | Sex and valueWhy, exactly, would that be relevant? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/05/15 06:10 PM |
| 2 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Again, you're assuming you know anything about my sex life. You don't. Please stop pretending you do. You're also putting a disturbing amount of weight into sex when it really isn't that important. Normal for TRP, but still disturbing. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 11:54 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Then I guess this is where we agree to disagree, because I cannot fathom ever feeling like physical attraction matters in even the slightest, and I know there's a lot of people like me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 11:33 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Then stop trying to say it's a rule that applies to everyone, because like you just said, you don't know unattractive women you enjoy hanging out with. Also, kinda telling if your opinion on women hinges on their appearance. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 10:58 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Given that it doesn't often enough to say "THIS IS THE RULE"... it isn't the rule. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 10:34 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Okay, so then your little method clearly doesn't actually work all the time. Given the confirmation bias rampant in TRP, I'd believe it actually doesn't work even most of the time. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 10:15 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?So it's impossible for a woman to be pleasant enough to spend free time with unless they're attractive, they find you attractive, and they want to fuck you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 09:15 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?"Friends" still comes 4 steps after "Attractive" in your little procedure, though. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 08:59 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Okay, so you actually are saying you wouldn't be friends with someone unless they're attractive and they find you attractive. Well, I hope doing it differently than literally everyone ever works out for you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 08:52 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?And that is why they end up in dead bed rooms Ah, glad to see you know so much about my sex life. That is the basis, you don't even say hello if you don't find someone atractive, not to mention asking them out. Maybe you don't. The "flow" isn't attractive->friends->relationship->sex, I have plenty of friends I don't find attractive. How is this possibly the case? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 08:33 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Physical attraction is in no way the most important part of a relationship. Were that the case, how would people with various disabilities ever find a relationship? For instance, if you're blind, you have no concept of physical attraction- yet blind people can still have very meaningful relationships. Or what about asexual people? They have no interest in having sex, yet can have very meaningful relationships. Or what about the fact you can have good relationships with people you don't actually … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 06:23 PM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Every relationship I've ever been in has just been "hey we're already good friends I wanna spend even more time together", not "HEY WANNA FUCK" I'm not saying the latter can't work. But good luck finding actual meaningful relationships when the backbone of it is sex rather than actually wanting to be in a relationship. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 09:19 AM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?I'm somewhat concerned for your relationships if they're all formed off the basis of "I WANNA FUCK YOU". Like, that's not how it usually works. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 09:06 AM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?accelerating the relationship past the point of comfort for your partner is just a common mistake women make while tring to solve their boredom or insecurity. Which is definitely not a mistake anyone else makes, it's just solely women. Yep. Mmhm. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 08:43 AM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Mm, you can almost smell the bad history. Currently any well adjusted women can pretty much keep any man if she keeps her ego out of the relationship and occasionally asks her grandmother for advice.(like with women that means not accelerating the relationship past a point where your partner is uncomfortable so you're probably not going to get married in the first week) Also, no. Glad to see you think the extent of a woman's ego is more or less limited to "MARRY ME NOW I'M WORTH IT I SWEAR" too,… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 07:49 AM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?Then I'm going to have to question whether your definition of "all" and/or "every" is actually correct. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 06:44 AM |
| 1 | To what extent is TRP based on the following selection bias?So if it works with men, are you insinuating there's a certain course of actions that a woman could take that would work with every man (who is attracted to women, that is)? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 29/07/14 04:11 AM |
| 17 | Boyfriend trainer. A nickelodeon game aimed at young girls.i'm not sure why don't you tell me | /r/TheRedPill | 31/10/13 10:36 PM |
| 1 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Ahahaha what Do you seriously believe that every single man is stronger than every single woman- aside from 85 specific women? Am I seriously supposed to read it that way? I... I have to just laugh maniacally at you to keep from crying at the sheer stupidity of this cesspool of a sub if so. | /r/TheRedPill | 25/10/13 05:35 AM |
| 3 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Cool how I linked three different ones in another comment in this then, huh? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 05:15 PM |
| 3 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.No, it doesn't rule it out entirely. What about women who are stronger than men? Or just as strong as the average man, even? Should they still be banned from physical labor? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 02:16 PM |
| 2 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Your entire point, other than "some jobs", which there are becoming fewer and fewer of, is "sports". Seriously. Reread that comment. Also, it's entirely baffling how you guys here on TRP can insist you're not sexist fuckwads when you make claims like "men are better at literally everything". | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 04:13 AM |
| 4 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Hahaha, you honestly think anecdotes beat actual science? Excuse me while I laugh to keep from crying. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 03:55 AM |
| 6 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Because, y'know, sports are everything, or even remotely important in any way. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 03:09 AM |
| 4 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.Funny how all of your examples involve driving a car. Which, disregarding the stereotype, but following actual evidence, women are better at. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 01:27 AM |
| 2 | Adam Carolla - "Men are Superior" [8:23] I loved this talk personally.ahahah what the shit is this | /r/TheRedPill | 23/10/13 12:28 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter