TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bobsentme Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by Bobsentme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

All these horrible stories about mothers abusing and killing their children in Michigan. I'm still waiting to see if Sylvia Majewska is going to fry or not for slitting a 7 month old infants throat.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:08 AM
4

If you'll excuse the diatribe, I'll give it a shot! On the other side of the fence, they see men as such animals that any sign of aggression, including hand clapping (slapping hands together and making noise) is going to set off fear in the brain. It doesn't matter the intent; it triggered fear, therefore it's bad. This is already happening with speech. Tell someone they look nice today, and you're in HR explaining you weren't sexually harassing them, you just noticed the extra effort they made …
/r/MensRights26/03/15 07:42 AM
13

Nope, nice try son but you're barely even reaching Social Justice Foot Soldier with that comment. Allow me to forge you into the warrior you're attempting to be: First, you need to expand upon your sense of entitlement. You DESERVE these things because the Patriarchy is attempting to mind-rape you by even bringing up rape; something that COULD happen to you at some point in your life (if you're a woman, of course. Doubly so if you're on a college campus. I mean, rape never happens to anyone else…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 11:28 AM
20

Well, real puppies take work, so....yeah.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 08:55 AM
1

Order of Men choosen: 1) Truck Guy. 2) Car Guy. 3-9,999) Anyone else. 10,000) Op. In short: Ops feelings were hurt.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:36 AM
-1

Right. But criticizing takes thought. Not just shouting "I'M OFFENDED" and running off crying.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:50 AM
-3

There. Was that so hard? Now sit back and rest while I show you how you've reached a point of circular logic and how you're nothing more than a FemNazi want to be, sinking to their level and trying to cause strife where there is none. A thick skin is a defense against verbal attacks, not exhausting feminism bullshit from mainstream sources. The irony of this argument is probably lost on you, but here we go Mr. "I'm Totally not using femnazi tactics here". The segment starts with an obvious bias.…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:43 AM
-6

I did. Now, you started this, so I'm gonna let you go first. Use your words, like an adult. Ok, ready? Go.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:56 PM
-4

Why? Why was it shitty? You want to post here and open a dialogue, then deride people who don't agree with you. Way to go. A really shitty thing to do... . would be... . to manspread... . all over... . this... . comment.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 07:23 PM
-4

You getting upset over this segment is fucking hilarious. Probably makes this sub look a bit more like a joke, too. Have thicker skin, or you're not gonna be long for this world.
/r/MensRights30/01/15 06:44 PM
20

Please. Women are treated like children. No way the contract would hold up in court, because she was obviously coerced into signing it by a big scary man who wanted to rape her. "But your honor, he said he wouldn't rape me as hard if I signed the contract!" is all it would take.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 08:41 AM
1

I'm curious. Why would you say she is?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 05:35 PM
13

I'm on it. Background Anita posts a twitter picture with 4 youtube screen caps of male critics, saying "Each time an angry YouTuber with 250k+ fans decides to slander & strawman me the harrassment increases exponentially." This man, AlphaOmegaSin is responding to her via youtube. So, here we are. The Points he makes: "Slander & Strawman" <--Bullshit. It's criticism. Stop playing up the role of damsel in distress who calls on her own followers to go after people who criticize you. Anita's argumen…
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:28 AM
2

I'll kill you for that! There. A death threat. Want more explicit? I'll kill you until you die from it! Damn, two death threats. Now, in this situation there are two outcomes: You realize both are empty threats (in this case to further the conversation) or you go on social media explaining to all your friends and family that some guy named Bobsentme on the internet threatened to kill you and that everyone you know could be at risk at any time in the future. There are varying levels of threats. M…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 11:47 AM
2

She's made half a million dollars for doing practically nothing. Don't underestimate this woman; she knows exactly what she's doing and she's doing it well. Masculinity in video games is nowhere near as subtle as females. Society isn't as passionate about male characters being sexually assaulted, harrassed, killed, etc. Society accepts this because, well, there's always more where that came from, right? I suspect she'll exploit this, begin telling male players that they're special, they should v…
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:23 AM
6

Well, yes and no. As she contradicts herself further and further, she's going to be criticized heavier and heavier. Which she'll take as harrassment, death threats, someone eating her first born (assuming she didn't already offer it's soul to a higher level demon to get where she is now) and so forth. She's made "big strides" this year by getting intel to commit to ideas without merit. She's got to swing the other way before she has to actually commit to anything and get called out for it. Yes, …
/r/MensRights27/01/15 06:10 AM
8

1) I applaud your grown up choice to leave your post as is, as everyone makes mistakes. 2) Remember people, check the article (pdf in this case) BEFORE commenting.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 03:35 PM
2

I love how this will eventually turn into women getting upset about the patriarchal terms getting thrown about, and thus turn it back into "WHY ARE WE USING MAN TERMS FOR EVERYTHING!?!"
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:16 PM
6

Look for the "...and this invalidates any previous contracts..." line. Always.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:45 PM
2

Or the entire state of New Mexico.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:05 AM
2

What's wrong with just letting people live their lives how they want to? Because a woman is unhappy with her social life, and the only way to fix that is to fix all men. Duh!
/r/MensRights14/01/15 08:02 AM
37

In short: "We already have stronger policies in place that we follow. If we followed yours, we'd be held liable for burdens you should bear. We refuse to once again be punished for doing nothing wrong. Good DAY, sirs." I hope they stick this out. UVA administration will lose this fight, whether in the short term or long term. They have no ground to stand on, right?
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:52 AM
2

I was going to write a wall of text here, but I'll keep my essay to myself. What I really want to know is this: What the hell is this pipeline going to consist of, exactly? Why is this better than the current pipeline of self-interest / self-learning / School / internships? While arguing that other companies don't publish their diversity statistics, why haven't you published your goals? What is the value add to Intel? I guarentee you that for number 1, it includes exclusions to current programs,…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 09:51 AM
7

Everything about this story sounds ridiculously fake, immature, or lacking some very important information. Just my humble opinion.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:29 PM
2

Yeah, there wasn't even a party last time and one woman's story was enough to shut down everything. The risk vs reward just doesn't seem worth it at all.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 12:02 PM
0

Best. Response. EVER.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 03:30 PM
1

But this would anger fat people...and guess who makes up the majority of THAT population? Hell, just look at the airline seat debate as it continues to rage on.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:48 AM
1

Like a death threat sent to a university if a certain person were to show up to speak? I'd love to see the results of that investigation.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:30 PM
-3

Loaded title with no link explaining the angle in which op is trying to push their agenda. Your angry response still didn't help or point out anything other than the fact you're angry. I would think someone like yourself who spend sall day submitting articles here could at least offer up an example of the shit you're spewing, rather than just being pissed off and giving non-MRAs examples of men behaving badly.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:34 PM
3

Non-sequitor while researching: "And of course, it's someone from Detroit. Goddammit."
/r/MensRights20/12/14 02:06 AM
-4

and for those of us who didn't watch? Look, ANYONE slaughtering ANYONE is bad. This is especially tragic because, well, kids. Feminists will use tragedies (fabricated or real) to their advantage. Let's take a step back here and be above the people we fight. Does that mean forget? Hell no. Does that mean forgive? Of course not. But we can't change what happened. We can only move forward knowing we might be able to prevent these tragedies by getting ALL people who need help the help they need and …
/r/MensRights20/12/14 01:57 AM
1

God I love this video. Well spoken, non-refutable points. Feminists and Feminist logic have become the "OOOOOOH WHAT YOU SAY..." meme. They keep shooting each other, and we're just sitting here watchnig them both die.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 10:37 PM
3

I agree this is a good thing. The only problem I see is it gives prosecutors more power.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 03:32 PM
0

Apparently you don't have better things to do.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:40 AM
-1

"Choosing to do something that is not attractive to men is the to their own detriment. " Huh? Are you saying a woman who isn't attractive to men has no inherent value? I find this ridiculous. Also, there is a billion dollar industry for cosmetics because they've convinced half of women to stick to 1 look, while telling the other half to "go wild". They supply arms to both sides of the gender civil war they've created and are reaping the benefits.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 03:39 AM
10

"Patriarchy" is only 10 letters. I suppose she has to fill the other 240 with SOMETHING.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:15 PM
8

So, in order of "People with the most Rape on their minds: 1) Actual Rapists (maybe? Dunno the psychology behind how often they think about it. Or if it's mostly opportunistic) 2) Feminists (as shown through the constant fear about it, calling men rapists repeatedly in public, and going so far as to be on these lists.) 3) Zeus. (I wonder if he ever helped create a herculean goose or other animal?) So, yeah. That about sums up the list.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 07:13 PM
2

There you go again, trying to be a problem solver! (kidding, kidding...sorry, been married too long.)
/r/MensRights15/12/14 03:33 PM
3

Is it just me, or does this seem like some early level sociology class homework? Why not begin adding nationality, religious or other issues to expand the results of the survey? I think you'd find the following overall: People would be far, far more likely to house someone in a situation like theirs than any other; even then, it would depend on their life experiences, personal preference, etc.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 03:32 PM
5

Sorry, 2 wrongs != 1 Right. Rolling Stone was wrong. This blogger was wrong. We should be raising the bar on journalism, not lowering it to this "citizen journalism" bullshit. Before others start trying to talk to me about "citizen journalism" via blogs, consider SJW's. Hell, just look at Reddit's own exercise in "citizen journalism" with the Boston Marathon bombing and how well that wen over.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:59 PM
124

This is classic confirmation bias. You stated "woman" and "male" scenarios completely differently, and in a way that makes people question the alone male far more differently than the female with child (because most people are born with an inherent sense to protect the young). Amazingly, you came to the same conclusion as your class: "Alone person is suspect; person with child has direct reason for reaching out for help." Try adding a child to the male situation, or remove the child from the fem…
/r/MensRights15/12/14 12:39 PM
1

Now I feel like an outcast in my family, a person who would sell out love for money. If this story is true (and that's a huge IF), then she isn't someone who WOULD; she DID.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 06:18 AM
13

No no, it was just a mistake made by a victim who was clearly victimized! Get your shit straight, not your facts! (sarcasm, because someone will read this and think I'm some tumblrina)
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:31 AM
5

Pfft, what next, ethics in gaming journalism? Do you want thunderfoot to run out of material?
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:30 AM
24

"This story is totes true. No need to check any of the facts!!!"
/r/MensRights06/12/14 01:28 AM
3

Thinking about it further, I see your point, and the problem with mine. I keep thinking in terms of right and wrong. Unlawful orders being unlawful no matter WHO is giving it. All that. But this woman was in charge of them, and supposed to be a moral compass. With that being the case, I can see how they'd have a screwed up sense of morals / ethics / sense of right and wrong. She deserves a very, very lengthy sentence for messing up several lives in one fell swoop. I take back what I said about t…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 07:05 PM
2

I respectfully disagree with the 6 kids as victims. Maybe they are victims by a looser definition than I hold dear, but not by my own definition. They made their choice, and to argue that they didn't understand the consequences is to call them sub-human. I'll admit there's little to no way they FULLY understood the consequences, but I doubt the situation was "Well, we either beat up a 6th grader, or we'll be expelled". They weren't facing a moral dilemma, they were staring "what's right" and "wh…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:17 PM
4

Her attorny says she hopes she gets to carry on teaching? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!?!
/r/MensRights04/12/14 11:17 AM
8

I'm actually shocked he survived detention. With the delays it sounds almost like they WANTED something to happen to him in there.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:18 AM
2

So, when someone says "IT" they're now referring to male masturbation? Damn, I was thinking sex. Heterosex, to be more specific. Fuck, guess that makes me a homophobe for not immediately thinking LGBTQZWNY@3#$ type sex. Anyways, let's call a spade a spade: This post is as ridiculous as calling that ad sexist.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:58 PM
3

Ryan Tennyson 2 days ago You shouldn’t have written such a shallow minded article and titled it “the best” of anything unless you were comparing actual deals. Everyone else is right. You are wrong. You based your “list” on percentage of savings and not on what retailers were actually the best deals. Wouldn’t even call it Twitter-worthy. Her response? Clare O'Connor, Forbes Staff 11 hours ago Ryan, It really is only ever men who try to tell me what to write and what not to write. Interesting, isn…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 07:03 AM
2

Needs brighter plaid shirts, higher pencil drawn eyebrows, and maybe some hoop earrings.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 06:41 AM
1

"The moon is a Goddess, always second nature to the sun. Why are we flying phallic objects at the moon goddess. This is obviously male oppression and rape. WHARGRABLE-GLOBBITY-GLOOP!"
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:54 AM
1

...
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:27 AM
2

1) holy crap your username. 2) I answered honestly. I stand by my answer. However, there's an added benefit to mispelling her name: Less google search results / rankings. The faster she fades from the spotlight, the better. At least, that's my opinion, I could be wrong.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:52 PM
3

Someone asked me why I kept spelling her name wrong. I gave an honest answer. I could twist my answer to follow the ideology of this sub, but then I'd be no better than her. So, which do you want? Honesty or an answer you wanted to hear?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:45 PM
1

We'd need a kickstarter to fund it...
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:13 PM
1

You know, I seriously doubt she considers that a negative male. That seems to be her preference for a male role model that all men aspire to be. But c'mon, no negative traits in males? Men have never shown dishonesty in any form of television media? Physical violence from husbands is practically the entire point of the Lifetime channel. If the husband isn't the bumbling idiot type, then they're usually the overbearing, overstressed, work-aholic type. Again, we have to question whether Anita like…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:09 PM
1

Before I assume all else in relation to businesses doing things, I try to look at the money angle. If you can find one, it's likely the driving force behind a decision. If you can't find a money grabbing angle, THEN assume incompetence, luck, and finally malice, in that order.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:06 PM
4

Her eyebrows keep throwing me off. They're pirate like, and I just keep wanting to go "AAAARRRRG-nita."
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:04 PM
5

Disclaimer: I'm not now, nor have I ever gone to graduate school. I received my associates, followed by a bachelors, then got a good job instead of continuing. That being said, her Masters Thesis seems to be a gigantic joke. How she contradicted her own research / evidence and still managed to receive a masters degree is beyond me. But it does speak to her habit of contradicting herself and falsifying information (EVEN HER OWN!) to fit her narrative. I believe the first point Thunderf00t was mak…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:55 PM
4

Pssst...your spam bot's shift key is broken.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:25 AM
2

Maybe? I can only sum up the video, not do your geography for you. :P
/r/MensRights13/11/14 11:23 AM
1

I'm going to assume this is slightly more a business move beneficial to them. Hear me out on this: Think about majority of twitter users: Self centered people who tweet constantly. So the short attention span tumblrinas, sjws, "media personalities", echo chamber experts, etc. Twitter might not be making enough from them. How do they double their traffic? PEER REVIEW! Now every tweet gets double "submitted" and guess what, they get to go to advertisers and claim more users or more activity based …
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:52 AM
3

Script kiddies is a term on the internet for someone who knows how to open a tool, enter basic information, and have it spit out some possibly damaging stuff. They don't understand how the tool works, who created it, why, or even WHEN to specifically use the tool. In many cases, a single tool becomes a hammer and everything looks like a nail to them. Script Feminists are the same way. They see buzzwords that evoke emotions and begin to use them in conversations to see how they can exploit things…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 09:04 AM
18

Bullet points for those of you who need a summary. Arnita is being called "an academic" with the following degrees: Arnita holds a Bachelors in Communication Studies, Masters in Social and Political thought. She's so proud of her Masters Thesis she removed it from her own website. Her Master's degree literally revolves around watching television. Getting her own business started 23 years old and started her own business promoting Tele-seminars. This grows up into her current business of making m…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:23 AM
3

This is actually an interesting video idea.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 01:48 PM
6

Woman at 1:15 look on her face: "Should I...should I call someone?" Let me answer that for you. There's a young lady breaking the law (public drunkeness), about to possibly harm herself or someone else. Yes, you call someone in this case. But all this is moot, because I swear to god she stares at the camera for a moment and then thinks "Fuck, another stupid camera show."
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:34 AM
2

Nobody, and I mean NOBODY in their right minds would legitimize rape. Statutory rape is, and should be, dealt with on a case by case basis. Otherwise two young teens who decided to explore their bodies would have their lives ruined for, well, being teenagers. Adults breaking the statutory rape laws are dealt with harshly, both in and out of court. Speaking of court... Voting "not guilty" during a rape trial does not legitimize a rape. It proves there was lack of evidence of a rape. This is a sid…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:30 PM
0

You're pretty pissed off for someone born a male. You might need to cut back on the hormone treatment, it's turning you into a SJW.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:02 PM
6

Fear is a powerful thing. It can be controlling, even. Few ever looks up to see whose pulling their strings, though.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:33 AM
1

Having random men ask for money while walking down the street isn't a good thing, it sucks. I had a guy walk up to me while I was pumping gas at 2 am, telling me I looked like I could spare some change, I was afraid he was going to assault me. I've had strange men come up to me and ask for a few bucks and get in my face, it's scary. I'm not even that rich looking. Are you worth more than a few bucks? Of course. But this response sounds a lot like the m&m argument. I'm a guy whose been approached…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:30 AM
2

I see the problem here. It's obviously because you forgot to read up on all the latest feminine literature, statistics, and anecdotal evidence stating you were going to get eye, ear, nose, and throat raped. Well, that, or scare tactics don't work on you.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 10:17 AM
2

Hugely valid point here.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:21 AM
1

Agreed. Well stated.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:05 AM
5

Watched the whole video, waiting for something funny. Didn't see it. Ends horribly. I guess every other possible parody idea had been done already and we've reached the bottom of the barrel.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 06:16 PM
39

Whoa, whoa. Unsolicited praise! EVERYONE WATCH OUT FOR THIS GUY! sorry, couldn't resist.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:40 PM
1

Reported for being a troll.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:47 AM
21

Wait, his shirt made him look gay? That's absurd. His shirt was form flattering, same as the first video. By your logic, they're both gay. Both videos have cherry picked responses. That's the point of the videos.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 11:18 AM
1

They hinted at this a few seasons ago, I think. The episode with the tardis eating creature that lured the doctor in. In one line, the Doctor specifically talked about a Timelord who was a fun guy, but a hell of a lady. So yeah, it's been done. Still...Missy...The Master...WOW.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:53 AM
5

Good question. But the burden of proving their point falls on them releasing the full 10 hours of video. Otherwise, it's like walking up and down 8 mile in Detroit and claiming you were robbed multiple times. If the area is problematic, then you expect problems and take precautions. You don't walk around waving your wallet in the air wondering why people are eyeing the cash hanging out of it.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:45 AM
6

Meh, easy target and proved her wrong according to herself. I liked that part. The rest reinforced everything that's good for gamers: We want fun to play games, not driven by pseudo-self-marginalized "victims" of games.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 08:48 AM
1

Yours is the only comment I've upvoted in this entire thread. Thanks for pointing out the old news.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:51 AM
22

Downvoted for old news, and this has already been proven false. Let's not start acting like feminists, ok people?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:50 AM
2

Click the links in the article. It's from November, 2011.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:49 AM
0

Meh, you're probably a troll, but I'll bite (this time): Please point to the spot in the video in which your triggers were fired regarding a sexual assault.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 08:51 PM
4

True. But Sam Pepper did other videos where he straight up sexually assaulted people. That's garnered more hate for him than the sitting video, as have the other things he's been accused of as well.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:55 AM
3

I don't understand how 2 wrongs are supposed to make a right here.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:32 AM
2

Look. You want her taken down? Great. I agree that she is a silly human being and I also can't believe people continue to follow her or give her money. That being said, this video is bad. It will be used against you, and you're coming off as the bad guy here. You want her off the internet, you have to do what Thunderfoot did. Meet her every flowing wall of bullshit with a steady wall of truth. Time and time again. In doing so, you expose the 3rd parties that claim neutrality while playing for on…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:24 AM
1

Type nice repeatedly, or lose. Because perpetuating the stereotype that women live only for compliments is really going to turn the men around.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:38 AM
2

There is nothing of value whatsoever in that video. At all. Period. Read into it whatever you want. What I got out of it is this: The amount of auto-tune shows a severe lack of talent. The complaining about what she could talk about vs what she actually talks about is useless pandering. The chorus "It's hard out here for a bitch" shows she's blaming the aforementioned problems on the fact she's a "strong woman". Whatever point she was trying to make about her physical apparence becomes immediate…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:16 AM
3

Becoming a default sub fractures the echo chamber that is a subreddit. I don't think many serious subs have been able to last becoming a default for very long.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 09:26 AM
11

The interesting thing here is that everyone keeps saying "Google her". No, fuck that. YOU Google her. You'll get her twitter and maybe, if you're lucky, you'll get something about what she did from some barely interested blogger. Try an unbiased search at DuckDuckGo. Top result? How she fucked over a guy with three kids because of her own immature behavior.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 05:27 PM
-14

Look, several things were done wrong here (from a US male perspective). He asked her to leave several times. She didn't. Call the police, it's trespassing. She pulled a bottle, he knocked her down with a chair. (Not excessive use of force by any means, I think this part was properly handled. But it should never have happened if the last thing had been done.) Throwing her over a balcony. Granted, not a very large balcony, but the intent to harm could be argued here. Out the front door is more pro…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:28 PM
15

Start out at $10,000. ;)
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:55 AM
6

Justice Jackhammer?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:41 AM
16

no no no...SUPER gold. Yeah, that's the ticket.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:40 AM
77

It's posts like this that make me wish Reddit had Platinum levels to donate. Op deserves it multiple times over.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:12 AM
199

Gender equality is important!!! brb, building "FundHim", a site where you help pay for my beer money and bowling funds for other men who desperately need social research experience.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter