TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BodrickTheBrave Archive

View 0 posts and 57 comments by BodrickTheBrave on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Yeah that's the worst. I've complained to gym managers about it before but of course nothing happened. Made me feel a bit better about it though, maybe you should try it too.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:55 AM
2

Yeah crying Jewish erasure is such bullshit. Just relying on guilt and fear of looking antisemitic to make the government act on emotions rather than logic. I really hope that Iceland stick to their guns on this one.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:49 PM
2

Ah yeah I see what you're saying. Initially though I was just pointing out that it wasn't just top men who were excluded specifically.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:44 PM
1

Oh, well that's why the top paid staff were excluded from the study.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:15 PM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:05 PM
25

How does this discredit this sub's cause? It shows that men and women are about equally underpaid in the BBC, but the review was done because women were complaining that they're underpaid. This result goes against the "gender pay gap" myth. Also, excluding the highest paid earners has no effect on this result. Not sure why you mentioned it, or why you felt the need to twist it to "the highest earning men" rather than just the highest earning staff as the quote implies.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:59 AM
1

That wouldn't affect this result though. And why would top paid men be excluded? More likely all top paid staff were excluded.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 09:27 AM
1

To be fair his response was being a dick. Pretending like he doesn't understand how promoting a business can be good for it. Not every exchange needs to be profitable for it to make sense for the business. Plus all she did was ask, all he had to say was "no".
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 11:34 AM
0

Meh, I see nothing wrong with asking to be honest. Her handling of it since then looks like it's shitty and she does seem entitled. But the hotel owner responded with so much hostility when all she did was ask. All they had to do was say no.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 11:33 AM
1

Things cost different prices in different places, crazy
/r/PussyPassDenied19/01/18 11:32 AM
1

FYI that comment is just a parody, not an excerpt
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/18 02:57 PM
1

Well what I'm saying is that you don't need to update the app to have withdrawn consent
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:38 PM
1

I think what /u/WackyWarrior is saying is that you could enter consent on the app, then change your mind, then engage with the other person. Changing your mind the next day isn't rape, and for what it's worth isn't what she claims happened.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:49 PM
2

My point is that you're talking shit about a country when everything you know about it you learned from /r/The_Donald and Fox news, and it's incredibly inaccurate.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/18 03:03 PM
6

Like a thoughtless liberal Lol Swede descendants So, no, you don't know any Swedes. You know some people whose maybe grandparents spent their childhood there? What laws and stats do you mean? Are you considering that the cross-section you see in TD are not representative of what the country is actually like?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/17 10:38 AM
6

>common sense >frequently posts on The_Donald Where did you learn this "common sense" from? Because I would wager good money that you've never been to Sweden or had more than passing contact with many Swedes.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/17 09:10 AM
1

Lol don't believe everything you read on /pol/
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/17 04:46 PM
33

Women retire younger, so they're getting more at the end and at the start.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 09:16 PM
2

Oh yeah for sure I agree it wasn't acceptable. Did upvote your original comment, just correcting the error.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/17 07:50 PM
3

Article doesn't say that alcohol was in her system, just that she'd drunk within the last 8 hours.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/17 07:30 PM
2

You're right, I haven't. I'd probably be angry and want them to serve the 3 months, but that doesn't mean that they should.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/17 08:39 AM
-10

The DUI caused a death. This woman disrupted a courtroom a bit and was insensitive towards someone. 93 days is too harsh. I'm sure she learned her lesson, I don't see the purpose served by a harsher punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/12/17 01:25 AM
6

I agree about the unnecessary artificial bias. When this sort of argument is made in movements which I don't support it annoys me, and it's no better here.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:01 PM
1

If she'll help her friend do it, her friend will help her do it.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/17 02:16 AM
1

I'm sorry that I don't agree with you on everything that you think, that doesn't mean that I am opposed to men's rights. I'm also sorry that this account is new. Which obviously also means that I am opposed to men's rights... For some reason... If someone commented on here saying "we should kill all women to stop them from falsely accusing men of rape", would you agree with them? I mean, their suggestion would save men from being falsely accused of rape, right? Therefore if you don't think it's …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 10:47 PM
1

Please quote to me anything I've said which implies that.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:25 AM
1

Are you seriously implyig that I shouldn't come to this sub unless I'm going to agree with every single comment? Pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:07 AM
1

Yes I have though, there's no point going around in circles
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:52 PM
1

People upvote drivel which they want to hear and downvote truth which they don't want to hear. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:41 PM
1

You say that like I didn't try to counter your argument previously. I gave up on that after all it produced was more babbling unrelated edginess from you. I don't need to have a better solution to point out the flaws in a proposed solution. Honestly the current system is better than what was proposed, even if it does result in guys like this one getting shafted.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 10:26 PM
1

I'm very much in support of improved rights for men. A comment can be in support of men's rights and stupid though, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 09:23 PM
1

If you really still believe that that is ever going to happen then there's no point continuing this conversation.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:44 PM
1

Lol wow. Get your head out of your ass and try reading what I'm saying, because based on your replies you haven't understood my comments at all. Me criticising one stupid suggestion does not mean that I hate men and think the current system is flawless. I thought this was obvious but evidently I overestimated this subreddit's readers. Anything anti-woman gets upvoted, anything going against that gets downvoted and insulted.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 05:34 PM
1

the law would require paternity tests at birth to determine the actual father of the child and ensure they are supporting the child You think that this will happen in the future? Because it would take a pretty drastic shift in the behaviour of people and the government before it ever is seriously considered. Aside from the cost involved, it's a pretty shitty solution. Edit: evidently you spend a fair amount of time on here espousing silly idealism with absolutely no regard for reality. I shouldn…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:44 PM
1

All a women is required to do is name any man she slept with just prior to becoming pregnant. That will absolutely never happen though. So we're back to pointless unrealistic idealism. Or maybe we never left it.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:34 PM
1

Yes it is the mother's fault, but under this proposal it would disadvantage the child. So it would never be enacted. So it's just silly idealism which leads nowhere.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 02:19 PM
1

I agree with that, but what improvements can be made? Because I've not read any good and realistic suggestions here.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:50 AM
1

I agree, but how can you make that happen? There's no point in unrealistic idealisation.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:31 AM
1

Why bother replying if you can't be bothered to make your own point?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 08:18 AM
1

You say they're unpalatable truths but in reality they just aren't true. Really sounds more like you're fifteen years old and edgy as fuck.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 07:59 AM
2

I'm not defending the current system at all. I'm criticising the flawed proposal which I replied to: to decide who pays child support by testing the apparent father. Cutting through some of your babbling though, do you actually believe that there's no reason for a woman to keep her baby when she can't afford it other than personal hubris? Either that word doesn't mean what you think it means, or you might just be incapable of human emotion. But then you delve deeper into sociopathy! "Everybody w…
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:52 AM
-1

What are you trying to say?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:42 AM
0

Yeah but what if the mother can't identify the father? I'm not saying that the nearest guy should have to pay, just pointing out a pretty gaping hole in that plan.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:28 AM
1

Okay... Not sure what your point is, you're just saying random easily agreeable shit, honestly.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:17 AM
0

What I said: isn't the argument for this guy paying child support basically that it's in the best interests of the child? What you read: Everything that the government does is driven by the best interests of the child! It does not matter who those interests negatively effect! Their primary purpose as government of this nation is to ensure the happiness of this one single child!
/r/MensRights28/11/17 12:02 AM
-6

This really isn't comparable to a random guy being selected though. He was married to the mother for 2 years after her birth, believed he was the father for 11 years, and no doubt has his name on the birth certificate. This isn't some guy getting a letter telling him to pay CS for some random kid he doesn't know. You're suggesting an obviously bad solution like because that one is bad, we should therefore take your one. I don't think that this guy should pay child support. I just think that the …
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:52 PM
2

She says she doesn't remember, now what?
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:40 PM
1

Well, they can do one thing for the child without having to do everything for the child. I don't disagree that there'd be some big positives in tracking how the money is spent, but in reality it would be pretty impossible to implement. More realistically I think it could be good to have some amount of the child support paid in non-redeemable vouchers for food, toys, clothes etc.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:30 PM
-1

Well obviously we shouldn't do that. What purpose do suggestions like that serve? The only one I can think of is to highlight absurdity in my comment, but I don't see how it relates to what I said so it can't be very effective.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:18 PM
1

I'm not commenting on who should pay for the child. Just that the law was made to serve the child, and that user's solution doesn't address that at all. In fact it harms the child.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 11:07 PM
0

Yeah sure it is a great plan until every woman who doesn't want to name the father says that they had a one night stand and don't remember who it was with. The fact that you say that amounts to "she (a single mother) can get a job and support her baby or just give it up" makes me glad that you aren't in a position to have any influence over this system at all.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:55 PM
-2

I'm saying that it doesn't solve the problem since you can't force women to name the father.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:44 PM
1

That isn't what I'm saying at all. I'm responding to /u/bufedad's suggestion that paternity tests would resolve the issue altogether.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:30 PM
-4

Ah yes an air-tight system there
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:08 PM
-44

Mm no it's a bit of both. Looking out for the best interests of the child while also trying to keep their costs down.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:21 PM
-37

Paternity tests can't determine who the father is, only whether a given guy is the father or not. What if the father is some other guy who isn't there? How do you get him to pay?
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:19 PM
-68

That's an interesting idea, but isn't the argument for this guy paying child support basically that it's in the best interests of the child? I only ask because what you're describing doesn't serve the child at all.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter