TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Boehemyth Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by Boehemyth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This is the sort of thing where you're not wrong, but its so petty compared to other real discrimination towards both men and women that complaining is not helpful to anyone. It's too easy to eye-roll at, and those who don't believe in male discrimination will become more entrenched in that idea.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 12:32 PM
1

Is there really no equivalent to the U.S. 6th amendment in the U.K.? For us, its a constitutional right to face our accuser in any and all criminal proceedings. It would be extremely difficult to change that here.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:32 PM
4

The reason is almost always justified as in the child's best interest. The reason it isn't automatic is because Atkins is legally responsible for acting in the child's best interest until his parental rights are abolished. It's likely that the argument is that he missed his chance to force Doolen to take over his responsibility when he failed to properly submit the DNA results the first time, and because the matter of paternity has already been challenged and decided, the court refuses to force …
/r/MensRights28/07/16 07:08 PM
1

Based on a lot of the comments here, I don't think this will be well received, but I don't think her point was necessarily one I disagree with. In fact I feel very similar to her from the other side of the situation. I think it's stupid that men are expected to pay for everything especially in today's society, and she clearly agrees with me there. I also often pay for my girlfriend when we go out, not because it's expected, she honestly really doesn't, but because it makes me feel good to do tha…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:06 AM
17

Grew a set of calls I'm so disappointed that that typo wasn't in a slightly different context that would make it appropriate.
/r/seduction21/06/16 02:15 PM
5

I mostly agree, but this was actually a pretty unbiased read as far as Mother Jones goes. Unlike many of their articles, this one actually described a lot of the other side's perspective and even pretended at times that they thought their points had merit instead of simply pretending a well thought out opposing perspective didn't exist at all.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 11:11 PM
4

I definitely believed this until I saw the laughable "success stories" at the bottom of the page. It's basically a bunch of pictures of WASPy looking guys that are "not running in 2016". K cool. I guess I'm one of their, admittedly less good looking, success stories!
/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:31 PM
24

The point would be lost, because nobody would believe him anyways.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:34 PM
1

I'm admittedly torn on this issue. On the surface, it seems like fair is fair, but It's not really the same thing. In one case, there is no child after a mother gets an abortion. On the other hand, a "legal abortion" still results in a child. Legal abortion just isn't the same as physical abortion. Then again, it's definitely not right that a woman can terminate both her and the father's parental rights on her own, but the father has absolutely no say one way or the other. It's a complicated pro…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:52 PM
6

Unless it is part of a counter suit for the negotiating table, I would. Defamation cases are extremely hard to win because the things you have to prove, such as malicious intent, even by a preponderance of evidence burden, are empirically difficult to demonstrate if it can't be absolutely clear they were outright lies.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:22 PM
8

That second challenge is legit.
/r/seduction21/01/16 03:14 PM
5

Then it depends on who takes the most feminine role. Never mind that that isn't supposed to exist...
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 10:16 PM
4

What context? I honestly didn't find anything that made me think he was passed out. It clearly says "blacked out" repeatedly, which I've always known to mean a person is conscious but unable to form anything but short-term memory. The issue that he is clearly unable to give consent in that state is more than enough to make this condemnable. Exaggerating the situation just makes people take everything less seriously.
/r/PussyPass18/12/15 10:12 PM
1

Reading things like this always really amazes me. These are clearly two educated and intelligent people, yet they are so obviously blind in the hypocrisy of what they are saying. They even contradict themselves a few times, in what is certainly a staged and edited "conversation". It's a shotgun approach of lobbing fallacies and accusations that really only sounds convincing when you already agree with what it supposedly supports. Maybe it's a symptom of how my generation was raised that we strug…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 07:28 PM
3

I actually had no issue with that article. It espoused a lot of my own beliefs as well. It was clearly targeted at other feminists, which is why it played so heavily on feminist history, so I'm fine with that. I didn't really gleen any implied ideas of blaming men or toxic masculinity, much less explicit. I'm curious as to what you might have found objectionable?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 06:48 PM
19

PP yes. But Police Pass. Her being a woman had nothing to do with it. Face down in the snow being tased. Even if he had a gun, there is no way to threaten anybody with it in that position.
/r/PussyPass06/11/15 07:10 AM
5

I'm also an eagle scout. My sister also did many years of girl scouts. The programs are in no way equal in value. I agree with others here who have pointed out the value in the boy scouts being specific to young men. However, I wish for the sake of women like my sister that there was a proper equivalent program for them. The venture program is great, I was a part of a crew for a time, but it still isn't really a replacement for the boy scouts for men, so I doubt it is sufficient for women either…
/r/MensRights29/10/15 05:35 PM
0

Under the law, he's guilty, since being lied to about her age isn't a valid defense in Michigan. That's why he pled guilty in the hopes of leniency. It's ridiculous to think the prosecutor can/should be sued for this. Hopefully lawmakers will use this case to change the law though.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:24 AM
5

Most of the stories I've read about this have been pretty sympathetic. I don't think this is "feminazis" as much as an old school judge pushing his own agenda from the bench. I'm not convinced gender has all that much to do with it in this case either. There doesn't seem to be much evidence of that.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:20 AM
23

Only indirectly so. I'm sure she's largely funding her lawsuit on her salary and bonuses from Reddit, which buying gold helps fund, but Reddit isn't directly paying for it.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/15 06:22 PM
-9

It doesn't look like it was removed...
/r/PussyPass30/05/15 10:16 PM
1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/14/white-grandfather-detained_n_1275383.html This was a very different story. Walking down the street with a kid on your shoulders and lifting a kid out of a fenced in schoolyard at two extremely different activities with much different levels of suspicious activity. To suggest /u/garaging agrees the grandfather in this story should have been reported because he thinks it was alright that the guy was reported in the other very different story is feminist-lev…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:09 PM
2

I agree that reporting this to the cops wasn't necessarily an overreaction. The overreaction occurred when the police issued a press release with the guys description saying they are investigating him as a possible child predator.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:49 AM
5

Why didn't he just pick up the ball himself and give it to him? It seems like way more work to lift the kid over the fence.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 06:45 AM
1

I didn't say they haven't. That's a separate issue.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:11 PM
1

Do you honestly think the opposite would be tolerated? That's not really the point. If we expect our opinions and ideologies to be given a platform, even when viewed by others as inflammatory and unpopular, then we must afford those we view as inflammatory to do the same. If your beliefs are so weak that you're ashamed of them then maybe they are not worth taking seriously. That is the point. It's not worth taking seriously.
/r/MensRights29/03/15 02:37 PM
46

It's not just the students either. A lot of the faculty believes this shit too. It's a strange thing when the basic idea that all of their logic applies just as well to other violent crimes or it doesn't at all is just something you cannot bring up in some classes and manage a decent grade. Luckily, I was an engineering student, so I didn't have many of those. This is very sickening to me. I'm a recent UW alum. I felt so lucky that we hadn't had a case get as out of hand as some other schools. B…
/r/MensRights03/03/15 03:04 PM
19

You sound like an asshole. Maybe that's why the cops aren't letting you off the hook...
/r/PussyPass15/02/15 05:13 PM
1

That's a good point, but OP's reasoning seems sound to me too. Maybe he can get a copy of the tape without pressing charges?
/r/MensRights16/12/14 01:55 PM
4

The teachers are saying that (in fact, the unions have been pushing it for years), not "feminists". Don't be so quick to conflate an idea or action with a movement because of your expectations.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 06:05 PM
2

I don't think we need more women in science, but I don't see a problem with a group being formed to encourage it either. I was an Engineering student at my university, and we had a women's engineering group. They were open to both genders. My roommate (a male) was actually their VP for a couple semesters. According to him, their goal was to encourage women to enter engineering fields. I don't see anything wrong with that. As the U.S. continues to transition into a post-industrial society, we wil…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:53 PM
2

I'm at the point where I believe there is more of a culture of feminists pretending they got a rape/death threat to try to make a point than there is a "rape culture.". Seriously, this is happening way too often, yet they still keep up the mantra that "women don't lie about rape". Sickening.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/12/14 12:24 AM
5

He invited the public to come and sit silently across the table from him not "do whatever they wanted to him."
/r/MensRights29/11/14 03:16 AM
8

I may not have the full story here, but he is saying because he was silent for the art project he couldn't speak? So if said women pulled a knife and attacked him he would have stayed silent? Hmm How does it matter? He never consented to any form of sexual activity. He never consented to be stripped. Or whipped for that matter. Just because he could stop them and didn't doesn't justify their actions.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:14 AM
12

I kind of agree with your logic there, but it doesn't seem like he consented, which would mean it doesn't apply.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 04:07 AM
24

So because a guy is in a fraternity, he is a "potential rapist"?
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:49 AM
4

I think that is hitting the nail on the head. The thing is, a lot of batterers do act that way and they are men. But women often do similar things. It isn't just "male privilege". Domestic abuse is much simpler than that. We don't need to define these complex philosophical ideas to explain it.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:57 AM
6

Feminism is the answer to that /s
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:57 PM
1

I've never heard that before, but if that's true, perhaps that "risky behavior" that we supposedly need to remove is actually helping advancements in healthcare...
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:03 PM
3

masculinity is largely a social construct... a traditional Western form of masculinity is damaging to health and thus work should be undertaken that challenges men on aspects of their masculinity, with an aim of decreasing risk-taking behaviours and improving health outcomes. Certain behaviors can increase risk of sexual assault by shitty people and thus work should be undertaken that challenges women on aspects of their self-responsibility, with an aim of decreasing risk-taking behaviours such …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:34 AM
1

The idea that you can be having legal sex one day, and then you turn 16, and now it is illegal strikes me as problematic. Otherwise, this system seems realistic.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:23 PM
1

I know. I was responding to the thread more than just you.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:21 PM
1

So a 16 year old can't have sex with a 15 year old?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 08:21 AM
2

I think you are nitpicking. As others have said, if you follow the chart through a single path, it makes sense. If both parties were drunk and neither person was capable of realizing the other was not capable of consent, the path you would follow for either person would lead to not rape. It's also worth noting that this chart (rightly) makes no reference two gender. It seems to me like you are looking for reasons to disagree with this, which baffles me, because it seems to align very well with M…
/r/MensRights24/10/14 08:08 AM
1

Correct me if I missed it, but I don't see any mention of gender anywhere on this chart.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 07:48 AM
6

I agree, but in a society where we hold men accountable regardless of the underage girl considering herself a victim, we should be consistent when the genders are switched. If this guys is fine, I don't want him to act like a victim, but his gender has nothing to do with that. Our law doesn't care if he considers himself a victim or not, so to me, it is a non-issue.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 04:42 PM
2

I don’t even know what this is supposed to mean. Clubs for men where they can shoot things? Really? I kind of understood her sentiment, because I'm sure there is a similar women's issue here, but this is where I lost her. Fuck that. She just wants to hate on men.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:00 PM
0

Most people who get pulled over for drunk driving are less than .1, which also isn't that bad. There is a reason that that was the legal limit for so long. My point is that just because something is dangerous doesn't mean there is a victim. I'm not arguing that drunk driving shouldn't be illegal. I'm defending my point that drunk driving can be a victimless crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/14 04:08 AM
-7

You can say the same thing about any traffic law. Would you say speeding is not a victimless crime? But yea, the drug charges thing is what I thought they were getting at too.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/14 09:32 PM
2

Not sure why you are being down voted. You are absolutely right.
/r/PussyPass07/10/14 04:06 PM
12

My first thought as well. I think this should be deleted.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/14 03:58 PM
-8

I think it was referencing that she's complaining about her crime, when she does the same thing for lesser crimes. Either way, DWI can be a victimless crime. If it was just a traffic stop, then there wasn't necessarily a victim.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/10/14 03:57 PM
21

Which is totally never something women do to men...
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:14 AM
4

There is one sorority at wesleyan, and no they are not affected. There are also two "non-residential" fraternities that are unaffected. What the "residential" distinction really means and how that's supposed to make a difference is unclear. Edit: to clarify, the sorority is also "nonresidential".
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:40 PM
3

Wow, the 2nd link on that subreddit right now is one of the most bullshit things I've ever read. Virtually no data, and the data that is there is grossly misrepresented and misinterpreted. If this is what passes for a quality submission to that subreddit, then I have to believe that its really just a pop science circlejerk.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 02:09 AM
3

This always bothered me from their FAQ: Why is /r/TwoXChromosomes a default subreddit and there is no dude equivalent? I'm tired of seeing posts that aren't relevant to me! There are 50 default subreddits that users see when they aren't logged in and when they first make an account, there are a wide variety of topics from philosophy to DIY to writingprompts to art to askreddit. Once you make an account you can unsubscribe from any of them and you will no longer see them. You can also search for …
/r/MensRights07/09/14 01:18 PM
1

It's a default sub. It is considered a subscribed sub for lurkers, and when you first register, you will be subscribed to it.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 01:05 PM
107

There is no statute of limitations in AZ for sexual abuse of a minor. The evidence is all right there with the baby he is being asked to pay child support for. Why isn't the state bringing her up on charges? They say the reason he has to pay child support is because she was never convicted of the crime, but it seems to me it is the states responsibility to charge her with that crime.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:43 AM
3

They arrive thinking there will be posts about how men 'deserve sexual access to women' and 'women belong in the kitchen' etc. and instead see a bunch of posts about child abuse, circumcision, alimony, child support, biased criminal sentencing, family court and so forth. This sounds to me like a perfect description of this sub. Unless you are referring more to published news stories and no redditor anecdotes...
/r/MensRights03/09/14 08:33 PM
1

when you're initiating the divorce, you're deciding to end the relationship, and the support that came with it. True, but the reason you are getting a divorce needs to also be part of whether that support continues. The possibility for alimony helps balance the power that the breadwinner has in the relationship. If you are just divorcing with no justification, then of course you should also be throwing away that support.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 08:08 PM
-1

Some women are victims, just not as many as society holds to be true. And whether or not the system let's men get alimony has nothing to do with whether a fair alimony system can exist.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:32 PM
0

That's actually the best counter point I have heard. What sort of marital duty are you referring to? It still doesn't change my mind that the purported purpose of alimony makes sense, regardless of equality of continuance of "marital duty".
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:30 PM
2

I think that's pretty narrow minded. The way I see it, if you flip the genders, it still makes sense. It all needs to be case-by-case and shouldn't just be a given in a divorce. I agree it is a broken system, but that doesn't mean there can't be a working system.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:55 PM
1

Yeah. Neither side comes away from this clean. She's pretty scummy for how she dealt with this. He's pretty scummy if his cheating betrayed their relationship. In fairness, this was probably a doomed relationship despite his cheating, and the wife is using this as an excuse to end it in a way that benefits herself. If you read her "confession", it is pretty obvious that she can't wait to start dating other people. She doesn't seem to feel very betrayed, just vindictive.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:15 PM
1

That would make sense. I buy that.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:08 PM
3

The purpose of alimony is to continue financial security and support that an ex-spouse has come to rely on. The concept of alimony is intended to balance the power that comes with being main source of income in the marriage. I'm not saying that this is how it works, I'm saying that this is what it is supposed to be. It is a worthy idea regardless of the genders involved. If you are saying that alimony makes sense theoretically, but obviously doesn't (and therefore can't) work in practice, I woul…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:08 PM
1

You're right to an extent. He fucked up. But punishment isn't the purpose of alimony.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:46 PM
7

I understand the purpose of alimony. It seems to be way more common than it should be though. It shouldn't be a given in a divorce.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:42 PM
1

ironically she let on the reasons why he could have done that seeing how she is on Reddit I don't understand. How did she let on?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 03:40 PM
2

The first half of this reads like an Onion article.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:27 AM
8

It was at a talk she gave at DICE after she was offered a job to consult on the new Mirror's Edge.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:09 PM
16

Did you have trouble figuring out the controls for Mirror's Edge? According to Sarkeesian, that's why women wouldn't play it.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:39 PM
4

The problem is they won't let us play our games in peace, isn't sarkeesian involved with Mirror's edge 2? I never heard about this so I looked it up. Holy shit this sounds horrible. I don't really know what she could possibly do to make this franchise more supportive of women's issues. It's not offensive to anybody (except totalitarian governments). The only thing that can come from this is misandry in the game. Unless she doesn't make many contributions, and just approves what they were mostly …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:37 PM
10

If the context of the casualty report is the goal, might I suggest "X were civilians"?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:59 PM
2

She's being charged with purjury right?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 05:24 PM
2

It seemed to me that he was polite, if not a bit arrogant. I definitely wouldn't say he attacked you...
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:49 PM
3

TL;DR OP has been doing the same thing he's griping about in other posts. That is very unfair of everyone. I believe this should be a place for healthy discussion and not a place where we just shout people of differing opinions down. As someone who has been actively commenting on this sub for months and been a lurker for much longer, I believe that, while there are the occasional exceptions, we tend to be mostly respectful of other opinions (including my own in some cases). That said, I am findi…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:22 PM
3

criticised the focus on male victims as deeply flawed. "The vast majority of domestic violence is perpetrated by men against women The sad thing is that this statement admits that domestic violence against men occurs. It seems to me from the article that authorities aren't asking for a 50-50 gender split. They just don't want any male victims that do come to the door to be turned away. It's truly the same problem they keep telling us women have had to put up with: a society that pretends an actu…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 02:12 PM
1

I don't see where in the article the man still needs to prove his innocence... Looks like the charges may even be dropped.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 08:57 PM
16

I think we can safely conclude that Chaudhary and Lee don't believe in the meaningful kind of free speech. Certainly, the demand to fire George Will and otherwise pressure the Washington Post is punitive and calculated to enforce conformity of thought on a difficult and contentious topic, not promote understanding. And when the common response to disagreeable opinions becomes political organizers unleashing social media lynch mobs, it opens a backdoor to total oppression. This sums it up perfect…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:06 PM
7

If this ends up becoming law and not being overturned in the courts as a violation of due process (after however many men's lives are ruined), the only way this will ever be repealed is if the genders are swapped around for a few cases.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:12 PM
-2

This saddens me, because, to an extent he is right. Depending on where he posts, there will be some misogynist comments. Even here, a borderline comment leaks out now and again. What we have is a brand problem. The MRM is seen as a fringe movement of misogynists. Especially here, a majority of us would be very much what this guy is looking for, but all he knows is the negative brand of the MRA. It is going to take a long time to change, but as we win legal battles and policy debates, and people …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:08 PM
15

I legitimately do not understand the issue they are taking with this. Is it that we spent so much money for security? That we raised so much money? It isn't very clear what their outrage is for...
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:53 PM
1

work towards mens human rights in a peaceful and responsible manner! men and women are both part of the problem and also part of the solution remember that always That is a very long and boring motto. We'd need something more marketable. But here's an upvote, because you're absolutely right.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:20 PM
1

Translation: Boys are grown up when they put up with women who won't grow up.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:17 PM
1

Actually, it sounds even more rediculous the other way around: "[John Doe] had a low GPA in high school, was at the bottom of his class, didn't play a sport, and came from a bad family, so he's probably not a rapist." I'm sorry, I'm beating this to death, but I can't believe this is actually an argument that has been given any form of credence.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:47 PM
1

"[John Doe] fits the profile of other rapists on campus in that he had a high GPA in high school, was his class valedictorian, was on [a sports] team, and was from a good family," This sounds like it is right out of The Onion. Profiling is stupid, but for some reason it just sounds hilarious when it's mixed with all these generally positive things about a person. "This person is very intelligent, successful, and generally blessed. He must be a rapist!" But seriously, the facts of this case sound…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:44 PM
18

As I was reading this, my girlfriend asked me what I was reading. I've been trying to explain the argument for it to her for the last 15 min, and she simply cannot wrap her head around the idea at all. She just keeps coming back to "If you consent, you consent." This is pretty much word for word her initial response: That's stupid. If i told you to take $10 out of my purse to go get me some ice cream and then changed my mind after I've already eaten the ice cream, I couldn't accuse you of theft!…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:38 PM
5

This is an extremely misleading headline! This is just a stupid misunderstanding due to inefficient bureaucracy. Even the ex-wife is on the man's side here. If there is any "outrage" it should be at a stupid government agency that is too mired in bureaucracy to actually work for the public. The story makes it very clear that everyone involved realizes this is just a misunderstanding and the man will not be expected to pay again.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 05:28 PM
3

And have you seen what happens when a woman opens an OKCupid account? My cousin is getting married on Friday to a girl he met on OKCupid. That seems innocent enough... But seriously, I'm curious what the author is referring to?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter