TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Boethias Archive

View 3 posts and 143 comments by Boethias on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think the underlying assumption here is faulty. There isn't proportionality to the general population in almost any domain. People are more or less likely to choose certain professions because of tradition and culture and those thing can correlate with gender and race quite well over long periods of time. It doesn't make sense to expect every profession to mirror the demographics of the general population, nor to automatically assume discrimination when you notice such disproportionality .
/r/MensRights02/03/20 05:26 PM
3

She was involved with two staffers. One was part of a triad with her husband. The other was a secret affair.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 01:18 AM
0

Slightly off topic but why is Miami U in Ohio?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:59 PM
1

The article is from 2012. The Supreme Court overturned this decision on in Jan 2013. Four justices ruled that it the law is not a violation of the equal treatment provision. (Section 15) and four determined that it was. The tiebreaker was Chief justice Beverly McLachlin who ruled that it was a violation but that it was a reasonable violation under Section 1. Her point was that Quebec has an interest in maintaining the law because to strike it down would immediately change the marital status of m…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 01:01 AM
16

I don't think it was precedent setting at all. It seems to be the case that he only acted as father for a short time and found out about the paternity fraud early enough. The B.C. judge said that the child had not developed any relationship with him as they had not been together for long enough. I'd bet that if the child was older and the mother hid paternity for longer it would have gone the other way. The Ontario judge explicitly stated that paternity was "not determinative in child support ob…
/r/MensRights14/03/17 05:54 PM
2

I'm afraid I don't. I imagine it would be difficult to study given that legal parental surrender is not the law in any country that I know of.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:18 AM
1

You're assuming that the rate of single motherhood would rise dramatically if we implemented some form of legal parental surrender which allowed men to opt out of caring for an unwanted child. I think this is a poor assumption. Women's choices to have children are not made in a vacuum. A lot of women choose to have children because they are poor and will have access to government benefits through their children. Those benefits are often gleaned from the fathers wages so the government can recove…
/r/MensRights17/08/16 01:06 AM
23

She isnt forced to keep the baby either. She can abort, adopt and in some cases even legally abandon the child anonymously through safe haven laws. If she chooses to keep the child then yes it is, and should be her responsibility alone. The man cant force her to keep or abort the baby so she shouldnt be able to force him into fatherhood either. Parental surrender makes choices harder for the woman but not impossible. And it secures a legal right for men that they dont currently have.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:56 PM
25

Its from The Myth of Male Power where he talks about how sexual ambiguity in new dating situations has become dangerous for men. This is a full paragrah quote: If a man ignoring a woman’s verbal “no” is committing date rape, then a woman who says “no” with her verbal language but “yes” with her body language is committing date fraud. And a woman who continues to be sexual even after she says “no” is committing date lying. Do women still do this? Two feminists found the answer is yes. Nearly 40 p…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:28 PM
3

I have a few questions first: Do you consider the scene to be morally problematic by modern standards? Not medieval standards Do you consider Ramsey's act to be criminal by modern standards. If so what crime would fit his actions? I get the feeling you are simply opposed to calling it rape in the strictest definition of the term. I suspect alot of people are reading into your comments that you also think it is not morally problematic. Despite that fact that you didn't actually say that I think i…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 02:59 AM
1

I just realized its not in the text of the article but the accompanying video adds that she "acted belligerently and allegedly recorded the officers..". She wasn't arrested but the Federation elected to suspend her. The Washington Post also has an article on it though they also cite TMZ as their primary source.
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:41 AM
2

The Canadian Constitution has a similar clause. Section 2 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:50 PM
4

You might try "The war against boys" by Christina Hoff Summers or "Is there anything good about men" by Roy Baumeister.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:46 AM
4

You can find a transcript of girlwriteswhat's video on male disposablility here.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:12 AM
0

Uhh Poe's law??
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:36 PM
1

Im not an economic idealist. I dont seek maximum economic output at all costs. Ive already conceded that this is not a productivity maximizing strategy but its a worthwhile concession in my view. You hinted at helping the disadvantaged in other ways. What specific alternatives would you suggest?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 09:45 PM
3

I'm gonna try and take gender out of it for second to illustrate my point. What if the person is disabled instead. A company often needs to make accommodations for the employee on account of the fact that they would be less productive than an able bodied person. But we would not use that as a justification for reducing their pay. Nor would be hold them liable for the cost of the accommodations. In effect able bodied workers are not only displaced by this policy but they are indirectly subsidizin…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:21 PM
13

I didn't start identifying as an MRA until I saw feminism's response to Elliot Rodger That's quite recent: Welcome to the dark side.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:31 AM
8

A situation like the one described above will not enter into DV stats because the police will not record it as a DV occurrence against a male victim. If they record it at all they might portray the woman as the abused party. Its not that abuse of men is rare. Its that you don't see it in the stats because of the reporting bias. Studies based on self reporting and surveys instead of police records show that DV is equally likely across both genders.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 08:57 PM
1

We do attack feminism and with good reason. We don't attack women unless there happen to be feminist. Feminism is an ideological movement that we oppose and are trying to separate ourselves from. Women are a diverse group of individuals, some of whom frequent this sub.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 12:47 AM
1

How do you all feel about this? Perhaps maybe this can be an eye opener for you all. I firmly support the men's issues movements. (No, it should not be called a "rights" movement.) But this subreddit has turned into the second redpill. If you're all not careful, this entire movement will be tainted. It's already seen as a joke, and you're all simply making it worse for yourselves. Just a heads up. This kind of reaction is to be expected. If a movement seeks to establish it's own position on gend…
/r/MensRights11/04/14 12:21 AM
1

By disadvantaged, I mean privileged Perhaps this should be "....I mean the opposite of privilege". Unless I'm misinterpreting you.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 01:33 AM
4

Brian Earp from Oxford University wrote a great article on the subject. The Truth about Circumcision is also a great video to watch.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:58 AM
1

Not an expert but I imagine it would depend on local laws. If the adoption/safe haven laws are gender neutral then in principle at least he could. In practice who knows.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:47 AM
10

In the long run there would be less children growing up without a father. A woman who chooses to have a baby alone can often rely on child support being forced onto the father. They are factoring that in when making their decision. If fathers had the right to opt out many of these women would choose to terminate the pregnancy or adopt out the child. In some cases there will still be kids growing up without a father but these cases would dramatically decrease. If you make parenthood voluntary, th…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 10:54 PM
1

That was Return of Kings. It sounded like a tradcon blog. Not really a fan of the whole women can't do anything and this movie proves it thesis. I haven't seen the movie but if that's how it goes I'd say its an unfair commentary on women at least.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 02:20 AM
6

Ok so the article cites the same CDC survey I did, among others. As I explained, the main problem I have with the study is the definitions of rape. A man who is coerced into penetrating another person is not considered a rape victim but a victim of "Other sexual violence". This deliberately skews the numbers for rape towards women. Do you personally agree with this definition? If a man is verbally coerced/blackmailed into having sex or if he is too drunk to consent is he not a rape victim in the…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:47 PM
3

you stated in one of your other comments: that only 3% of rapes are men. That other 97% is female. One in 5 females have been raped. 1.3 million women are raped each year (average). Where do these statistics come from? The best study(though still problematic) I've seen on the subject is from the CDC in 2010. If you look at table 2.2 you'll see the estimated annual numbers for rape and sexual violence. The problem is that male rape is defined not as rape but as other sexual violence(subcategory "…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:58 PM
2

Awesome! Thanks.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 11:18 AM
3

Is the blog new? I haven't found anything on it more than few months old. It's good. His writing style reminds me of Toy Soldiers.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:56 AM
1

Brian Earp wrote this in about the circumsicion in reponse to some tweets from Michael Shermer. Its a long read but quite informative.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 11:19 PM
41

Because the change is being put off, women will be able to choose which test of upper-body strength they will be graded on in their annual physical fitness test. Their choices: —Pullups, with three the minimum. Three is also the minimum for male Marines, but they need 20 for a perfect rating. —A flexed-arm hang. The minimum is for 15 seconds; women get a perfect score if they last for 70 seconds. Men don't do the hang in their test. Maybe they should have the right to choose how strong an enemy …
/r/MensRights03/01/14 04:22 AM
2

thanks
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:22 AM
6

Where/When can we buy tickets. I live in T.O. and wouldn't wanna miss this.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:03 AM
7

And men in prison are...what? All innocent? This has nothing to do with rape. They are already in prison. Rape and violence is not part of the punishment. I wonder if you would suggest that female prisoners deserve to be raped in prison as well just because they are guilty of crimes. And the fact that men are the perpetrators of violence doesn't mean you get to lump perpetrators and victims into the same category based on their sex alone. Its also true that most American crime victims are victim…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:47 PM
16

I find it highly unlikely that even the Congo's high violence rate is enough to push the global average up to 1 in 3. That's just absurd. To your second point: Men make up the majority of perpetrators and victims of violence. That would include even rape if you added prison statistics and expanded the definition of rape to include forced penetration. But all of that is beside the point. Gendered violence is an illegitimate term because it highlights only women's victimization at the expense of m…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:06 AM
1

She is half white though.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:03 AM
10

That's Quincy and Rashida Jones. She's his daughter.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:55 AM
3

Modern Parenthood is a more recent survey by Pew Research. TL;DR: When paid work, child care and housework are combined, parents in dual-income households have a more equal division of labor than parents in single-earner households. In dual-income households, fathers put in, on average, 58 hours of total work time a week, compared with 59 hours for mothers. In households where the father is the sole breadwinner, his total workload exceeds that of his spouse or partner by roughly 11 hours (57 vs.…
/r/MensRights08/11/13 05:04 AM
1

The article was never meant to be taken on a personal level. The author says as much in the following quote: By realizing that you were, are, and always will be expendable. Maybe not to your friends, family, or lover(s), but to society at large. And so you act accordingly. Still the intention is not for you to hate yourself or to become nihilistic about male disposabilty. But you shouldn't deny that it exists either. Instead you can understand it better and learn to live for yourself despite soc…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:39 AM
2

Men sign up to do dangerous work because they have fewer realistic options. Before women entered the workforce they were largely stay at home moms. They had an expectation of protection and provision from their fathers, brothers or husbands. That gave them an addtional option that men didn't have. They still have it in many ways through government aid and social services or directly from men in more traditional family structures. By contrast men could either work or starve. It is logical that ma…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:19 AM
1

I think our evolutionary history is a plausible enough reason. We are not the only species to have disposable males. It's pretty common in sexually dimorphic animals(e.g. lions, the great apes). What other explanations were you thinking of?
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:02 AM
1

Author seems to be getting a bit of resistance in the comments. Almost everyone is pointing out the double standard.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:58 AM
1

He's not saying you have to see yourself as disposable but that society will see you that way. One way or another you are going to have to work around that bias.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 03:47 AM
3

She has served as a consultant for the CDC for years. A Voice for Men has summarized her history of association with them.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 03:20 AM
3

Gender equality is a moral ideal. Feminism is a political movement. Conflating the two is like saying that you cannot be ethical without also being religious. Although if you're dad is religious this argument might fall flat.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 10:50 PM
1

This doesn't count as unbiased but it remains the clearest explanation I've seen: Stefan Molyneux - The truth about circumsion
/r/MensRights25/10/13 03:55 AM
4

I'm not sure but it sounds like you might be talking about Mary Koss. Her University of Arizona page can be found here. Information on her work and influence on CDC policy was outlined in this A Voice for Men article
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:08 AM
1

I remember seeing something on here about domestic violence cases where it said women were most likely to be the perpetrators in nonreciprocal domestic violence cases. This might be what you're referring to. Unfortunately it's behind a paywall. I don't have data that makes direct comparisons between adults and children. The CDC NIPSV report from 2010 suggests that women are victims of intimate partner violence on slightly more often than men. However, the men's data does not include any numbers …
/r/MensRights05/10/13 05:13 PM
1

This may be great for men but it will be absolute shit for society. Bonobo's don't do shit all day except eat sleep and fuck.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 02:58 AM
2

Bad choice of words. Corrected
/r/MensRights06/09/13 05:28 AM
8

Apex fallacy. Male lions not at the head of a pride are both more numerous and more invisible.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:08 AM
4

In modern foraging societies the animal content of food ranges from as low as ~30% in some parts of Africa to almost entirely animal in colder climates like Alaska. It is likely that meat played a relatively important role in colder climates with sparse vegetation, such as Europe during the ice age. This article in Nature Magazine suggests that the average intake worldwide in modern foraging societies favors animal calories(sample size=229, pg 2 table 1). It should be noted that "animal" is subd…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 11:46 PM
1

Some links that I keep handy: Gender differences in sentencing The myth of deadbeat dads The help seeking experiences of Men who sustain IPV Scope of Rape In the "Scope of Rape" paper I'd draw your attention to the definition of rape. on page 10 of the document. Note the different definition for men. Koss' work has been influential in determining policy toward the study and criminal prosecution of rape. That's just a taste, let me know if you want to dig deeper into any one specific topic.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:26 AM
1

I do not consider it to be unpaid labor. Don't put words in my mouth. ... you're aware that you're looking at lucrative personal gain to being a SAHP? Yes I am aware that it is a financial gain over the minimum wage. But it may not be a gain over that person's opportunity costs depending on their education and potential earning power. If the benefits you describe cannot match the benefits of being never married, working full time and being financially self reliant then being a SAHP is still a de…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:03 PM
-2

I'm not disputing that the current system is unfair. We were talking about equitable prenups. If there is absolutely no upside to being a SAHP than no one would ever rationally choose that. It's not logical to make it a dead choice. We are trying to correct inequities in the system not over correct them.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:53 PM
-1

If she remains never married she will likely have a job to support herself and remain childless. If she gets married and has children and stays at home to care for them, there is an economic opportunity cost involved in all of that. That cost has a base value and if the marriage fails she should be compensated for her "owner's equity" in the marriage. The unfairness comes from tying that value to the breadwinner's salary instead of it's underlying intrinsic value. It may not be worth half his as…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 02:01 PM
11

In fairness, from reading the whole question it seems she doesn't understand what a prenup is. She seems to think she will get absoulutely nothing not matter how long they are married.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:13 AM
5

Burr eventually turns this into a full 10 minute routine.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 01:24 AM
1

It's unfortunate that she disabled comments on the video which led to this one. I would have liked to see the discussion unfold. Her challengers obviously gave her a lot to think about. I suspect /u/typhonblue also had a hand in changing her mind. Perhaps she can shed some insight.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 01:27 AM
2

I would agree with all of that. But criticism of the double standard shouldn't amount to an argument that society should start dismissing female victims of stat rape in the same way that they already do for males. We're trying to make things better not worse. I'll admit I've never heard a story before of where a judge gave a reduced sentence like this when the victim was female. However, I can't help feeling like it's a step backwards rather than forwards.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 04:04 PM
14

I don't think it's about acceptance rates. Its has more to do with boys being alienated by the education system. They tend to under perform in school and then feel unprepared for college. Even if the colleges are accepting males at the same rate the fact that they aren't applying could result from disillusionment with a gynocentric education system. That said, your suggestion that more men are applying to apprenticeships instead could be a factor but I think it's unlikely because apprenticeship …
/r/MensRights08/08/13 11:36 PM
2

This is the story that the thread is discussing.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:11 PM
31

This is ridiculous. If the genders were reversed would OP be saying the same thing. There have been numerous cases posted to this sub where an underage boy has an affair with his teacher and we condemn the fact that the teacher gets a slap on the wrist. The same standard should apply hear. Its statutory rape. The willingness of an underage participant should not be a factor. The man in this case should be serving prison time.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 05:32 PM
16

It's a rational response to the current social climate. There is little alternative in my opinion. If you disincentivize men from marrying then they won't marry and you lose the resulting economic productivity. It not on MGTOWs to change things. The society needs to recognize the incentive structure is skewed. All though I don't agree with everything in Vilar's book (actually I think she was a little harsh on women) I find it frustrating that none of the stuff she talked about back in 1971 has r…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:00 AM
15

Really?! That doesn't seem apparent at all from the article. She said: 'I wanted to satirise the ways that these cases are received in society. Always looking to excuse the woman rather than looks at it as a criminal case, the way we do with men.' Apparently she used to go to high school with the sex offender mentioned in the article - Debra Lafave and was inspired to write the book after being shocked at the media coverage surrounding that case. Nutting's inspiration came from the media attenti…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 10:38 PM
13

Not saying it can't work. I just don't like those odds. to each their own though.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 03:27 AM
10

Married at 20? That's way too early.
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:29 AM
10

You're overreaching a bit. The context is clear.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:36 PM
1

So what happens to the women who cannot get married due to lack of availability of husbands? Usually in polygynous societies there are a number of unhappy men who remain single for life. Does something similar happen here?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:48 PM
138

This was part of an anti-violence campaign back in 2010 by a Danish non-profit. The campaign is called The bitch hits back. Here it is in full. And a couple more: The bitch hits back #2 The bitch hits back #1
/r/MensRights27/07/13 04:26 PM
2

Report mentioned in the article can be found here. Compiled by The National Center for Family & Marriage Research at Bowling Green State University.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:08 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:40 PM
2

Just a typo I think. The usual measure is marriages per 1000 unmarried women. (women being defined as females fifteen or older)
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:39 AM
8

the next is a girl getting done from behind (not screaming in pain or crying) dreaming of power. That's not how it was depicted in the book: Even the nights brought no relief. Khal Drogo ignored her when they rode, even as he had ignored her during their wedding, and spent his evenings drinking with his warriors and bloodriders, racing his prize horses, watching women dance and men die. Dany had no place in these parts of his life. She was left to sup alone, or with Ser Jorah and her brother, an…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 09:30 PM
12

This is not entirely accurate. In the book the initial "wedding night" scene i.e. the first time they have sex is consensual and enjoyable for Dany. However after that the book does mention that Drogo repeatedly gets drunk and engages in rough sex with her that she does not enjoy. There is a scene in episode two where he is fucking her doggy style and she is crying. This is also mentioned in the book. The scene where she finally insists on having sex face to face later in episode two is also acc…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 07:22 PM
4

If you are not going to contribute then this will be a short conversation. Stop making excuses and present a proper argument.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:53 AM
1

by Esther Vilar.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 03:53 AM
3

Modern Parenthood by Pew Research was released a few months back. It focuses on mostly parents so there's no data for childless couples but it's pretty comprehensive. The appendix contains definitions for what constitutes work and leisure time etc. TL;DR: When paid work, child care and housework are combined, parents in dual-income households have a more equal division of labor than parents in single-earner households. In dual-income households, fathers put in, on average, 58 hours of total work…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 10:35 PM
5

Does your state have permanent lifetime alimony? Could you briefly, talk about how alimony and child support are calculated, in general? What's fair or unfair about it? Do courts do a good job - in your opinion - of distinguishing between not-custodial parents who can't pay and those who refuse to pay? Any interesting stories on this topic?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:56 PM
1

I don't think it's severe at all. I wouldn't be in favor of lowering the sentencing for men either. Consensual sex is meaningless in this context because she is his teacher. On that basis alone the punishment fits the crime.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 04:44 PM
7

SAVE is a good one that operates in the U.S. Note: SAVE stands for Stop Abusive and Violent environments and their website can be found at www.saveservices.org. There is at least one other DV group that uses the same acronym but I can't recommend them.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 04:08 AM
19

The prison reform trust in the UK lobbies for reducing or eliminating prison for women. Their site has a section dedicated to women. No similar section for men. Their initiative was featured in the Telegraph a couple of months ago.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 12:26 PM
3

From the article(emphasis added): Judge Sherry Stephens was forced to declare a mistrial of the penalty phase and dismissed the panel. The mistrial set the stage for a whole new proceeding to determine whether the 32-year-old former waitress should get a life sentence or the death penalty for murdering Alexander five years ago. If Arias faces a new penalty phase, her murder conviction would stand, leaving the new panel tasked only with sentencing her. You can also see this post I made elsewhere …
/r/MensRights26/05/13 12:35 AM
4

|And holy hell, she might actually walk? She will not walk. She's already convicted. This is the death penalty phase which requires its own separate trial. She's getting life in prison at least. This is just to determine if she should get the death penalty. Its explained in more detail in the article.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:21 PM
12

The logical problem I see here is that every family is different. Wives who make more money than their husbands are still more likely to get custody. Certainly there is a general discrimination against fathers as well but that is a separate issue from the economic incentivization of the State and the family court system. It only serves to make the problem more intractable. If this was true, there wouldn't be gender bias in family court, but rather class bias based on earnings. There is a huge ge…
/r/MensRights17/05/13 04:42 AM
74

The States get reimbursed by the Federal government depending on their enforcement performance and the amount of money they collect from non custodial parents. 42 USC § 658a - Incentive payments to States
/r/MensRights17/05/13 03:41 AM
15

This make sense for men given the current system. But his point was that men wouldn't be put in this situation in the first place if there was a legal obligation for disclosure on women. If courts held women legally responsible for not disclosing the possibility of multiple fathers these problems could be avoided all together. It's about holding women responsible for women's choices.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:05 PM
4

He's referring to "Big Red". The woman the authors allude to in the opening paragraphs.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 03:31 PM
1

For example, I believe "patriarchy theory" originated in the original push for women's rights where the US did in fact exist as a patriarchy. This is a point of disagreement. The so called patriarchy of bygone generations is fundamentally an extension of an ancient social arrangement that was neither designed to oppress women nor perceived as oppressive by the women of that time. As a man, I'm expected to stand in front of the cave while a woman hides inside. She and I are both participating in …
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:46 AM
1

I agree that feminism did not change to include misandry. It has always had its fair share of it. Misandry in feminism is part of the core ideology, not some "car theft" add-on. Patriarchy theory for example is inherently misandric and has been a part of the movement from the beginning. With regard to Rad-fems, when the National organization of Women refers to Father rights groups as an "abuser's lobby" there is nothing radical about their position. Unless you are suggesting that the largest fem…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:56 AM
3

How would you label the bottom left? Misanthrope? Gender egalitarian?! I don't think feminism belongs on the vertical axis. It's certainly not neutral to men's rights. It has long history of pushing for women's right's at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:17 AM
4

You have to consult a divorce lawyer for this. This is not the place for this kind of advice.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 04:57 PM
1

I don't see how that's possible. The U.S. Supreme court has mandated a long and drawn out sentencing and appeals process for capital crimes. It requires that death penalty cases be afforded a separate trial to determine whether execution is necessary in a particular case. This means that after the defendant is convicted of a crime the prosecution must further prove in a separate trial that the crime was sufficiently depraved to warrant execution. This process can take years in and of itself but …
/r/MensRights19/04/13 01:26 AM
2

Seems like you've both had a rough time of it. It's not worth losing your mind over. Take care or yourselves.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 04:19 PM
2

Interesting. How does your husband feel about changed mindset?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:42 PM
4

Thank you for doing this. How was the speech received? Was there an opportunity for discussion afterward?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 04:39 AM
4

I support a being fired. Her handling of the situation was totally inappropriate. I find it ironic that she she chose to voice her displeasure at those men's unprofessionalism in such an unprofessional manner. She published her grievances on twitter. She could have easily told them to tone it down. She didn't even confront them directly. It was cowardly, childish and above all, unprofessional. After one of the men got fired she didn't even express disappointment or condolences. In fact she was p…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 11:55 PM
3

Link to original quote?
/r/MensRights20/03/13 11:22 PM
1

Sorry, I don't. I'm just a fan of the website.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:01 AM
3

Congrats! I think you should get in touch with Paul Elam. I'd love to see your story published on his website.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:43 AM
0

I was kind of pissed that women could come in out of nowhere and just get top billing above established male fighters. Like I understand your trying to appeal to the masses but don't make two unknown fighters the main event.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 01:49 PM
149

Shaming is the only tactic left when the facts aren't on your side.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 10:58 PM
1

China's sex ratio for adults 15-64 is 1.06 male/female. Russia's sex ratio for the same category is 0.91 male/female. Just sayin....
/r/MensRights14/02/13 02:26 AM
2

This was part of an anti-violence campaign back in 2010 by a Danish non-profit. The campaign is called The bitch hits back. The video is missing the PSA's tagline at the end. Here it is in full. And a couple more: The bitch hits back #2 The bitch hits back #1
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:23 AM
-2

Fair enough. But my point was anger is a legitimate response.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 12:12 AM
4

Anger is not only a perfectly rational response it can also be quite helpful to this movement. Conciliatory rhetoric gets us nowhere; particularly at this stage because we are so small and command so little attention. Erika Jarvis observed in her interview with Paul Elam that she would not have heard of him if he had been "nice". Folks don't listen to reason because the like reason. They listen to reason because they are afraid of insanity.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:56 PM
11

Wow that's amazing. Honestly, I thought for sure you were screwed. Congrats bro!
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:09 PM
7

This is seems to be part of a much larger debate going on right now within the movement as a whole. How conciliatory should we actually be when drawing attention to these issues. I don't think there is a single answer to this. It's a judgment call; it depends on which friends you are willing to keep and which you are willing to let go. Inevitably, some within the movement are going to be very conciliatory and some are going to be very confrontational. Where you wish to fall on that spectrum is r…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:08 PM
4

You really should have pressed charges when you had the chance. At this point your best bet is to talk to a lawyer. Document everything. Take pictures of your shoulder bruises. If she threatens by you by text or email save it and take that to court too.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 11:50 PM
9

Glad you stood your ground. Gender segregation on buses and trains is bullshit!
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:51 PM
2

This is why House MD was one of my favorite shows.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:04 PM
2

That seems a lot fairer.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:56 PM
1

M2F transexuals or Y Chromosome females with CAIS will also do the trick.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:34 AM
1

Wait so you can't just sue for support on the basis of biological paternity? Suppose you were married and then divorced but your wife cheats on you and you later find out the child is not yours?(as in OP's hypothetical)
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:26 AM
2

OP's article is a little dated. The decision was appealed to the SCC. They came back yesterday with their decsion Montreal Gazette
/r/MensRights25/01/13 06:45 PM
30

By never marrying, I ended up never divorcing, but I also failed to accumulate that brocade of civility and padlock of security—kids you do or don’t want, Tiffany silver you never use—that makes life complete. WTF?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:32 PM
9

I'm having a lot of trouble reaching any conclusions on this one. The whole case seems downright bizarre. I honestly find it hard to believe that several Nova Scotian courts and the SCC all found here allegations of abuse plausible without there being any evidence. There must have been something to back up her claims On the other hand. She has not sought custody of the child, nor has children services taken any action based on her allegations. I honestly don't know what to believe.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 02:05 PM
58

Just to be clear: This is a different story from the New Delhi case. The events in Delhi occurred on Dec 16. This case came to light a few days later.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:35 AM
2

Any news on when the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments? In most of the other provinces common law unions are treated almost exactly like legal marriages. Only Quebec draws a distinction. I'm glad the Province saw fit to appeal. I was worried they would just let it go.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:26 PM
0

You're right. When I look at it again the Table shows estimates for kilo calories returned per hour of labour. My mistake.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:45 PM
12

Based on calories, gatherers were WAY more productive than hunters. This is misleading. Even in modern foraging societies the animal content of food ranges from as low as ~30% in some parts of Africa to almost entirely animal in colder climates like Alaska. This article in Nature Magazine suggests that the average intake worldwide in modern foraging societies favors animal calories(sample size=229, pg 2 table 1). It should be noted that "animal" is subdivided into hunting game(male dominated) an…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:46 AM
4

Not familiar with the background of this story. What was the page about?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:02 AM
0

Are we sure this a real. Poe's Law?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:57 AM
2

soshoku danshi! The younger generation of men have caught on to this reality.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:54 PM
3

I'm not as articulate as she is. Try typing the title into youtube's search bar. Should be easy to find.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:39 AM
16

Feminism and the Disposable Male
/r/MensRights20/12/12 05:19 AM
1

Maybe I'm misreading this but it seems like a good thing to me. They are saying that total lifetime risk of cancer is increasing because survival rates are improving.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:11 PM
1

Off topic, but I've been noticing this sub on the front page more often recently. Glad we are getting more exposure.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:06 PM
4

I can only hope that actually having a boy will change her mind. Otherwise it's gonna be tough for that kid growing up.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:20 AM
9

The sample size is too small.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:52 AM
6

The lecture was supposed to start at 7pm but the protestors blocked the entrance. Campus police elected not to move them but to wait for Toronto police to come in and assist. Took 45 minutes to clear everyone out and let the audience in. Some people (myself included) found alternative doors to the building and got inside earlier than that. Dr. Farrell waited till 8pm to begin the lecture and by that time only half the audience remained. A lot of them gave up cause they had to wait too long, whic…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 06:48 AM
2

I'm sorry this happened to you. At least you found out she was crazy early. If you woulda had kids with her things would have been much worse.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:08 PM
3

TIL! edit: That you can sneak an edit in if you are fast enough!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 03:29 AM
1

Canadian here. I'm not familiar with the legality of sex work in Australia. I was under the impression that it was legal. Do brothels get harassed. Is there a lot of public opposition to sex work? In Canada prostitution itself is legal, but soliciting or communicating for the purpose of prostitution is not making it a de facto crime. However the Ontario Court of Appeals recently struck down laws against brothels and pimping. The ruling has now been stayed pending an appeal to the Supreme Court. …
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:31 PM
1

Got my ticket! looking forward to it!
/r/MensRights04/11/12 12:19 AM
1

I'm not sure what to make of that. On the one hand its disgusting the way fathers are treated by the court system but if you are a big brother then "protesting" the issue like this ends up being a shitty deal for the kid. It's a tough call.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 04:03 PM
9

Don't push the issue too much. It's a new idea; she's not going to be immediately receptive to it. Keep mentioning your stance on men's issues now and again but if she starts getting defensive back off a little and then bring it up next time. It helps if your not just talking about men's rights in general but actually pushing your stance on a specific event or issue. E.g. don't just bring up how "the wage gap is bullshit". Talk about how you disagree with the White House's proposed legislation o…
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:20 AM
3

Your confusing average with deviation. Men's and women's averages will be the same but men's deviation will be higher i.e. Most men don't get laid, and the ones that do get laid a lot.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:08 AM
2

Nice find!
/r/MensRights01/11/12 12:58 AM
3

There's a lot of dickishness in general on xbox live, not just sexism. If they actually enforced bans in a big way they would probably end up losing a large portion of their fanbase.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 11:43 PM
1

It's not just in Europe!
/r/MensRights30/10/12 04:39 AM
1

StatsCan puts it a 40.7% based on 2008 data. (pg 8 Table 1) Divorce Cases in Civil Court 2010/2011
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter