TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bogmoose Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by Bogmoose on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Those thoughts and those people do no good to you. I'm going to focus on *you* here because you've probably had your experience with people telling you "how you think of women is disgusting/wrong/toxic/bla", and it has not helped. You've come from an echo chamber of toxic thought, and time after time toxic thought wants to throw you back in there. You're vulnerable to preaching those "truths" as absolute because we all need an identity, frameworks, principles and a modus operandi in general, and…
/r/ExRedPill22/12/18 12:15 PM
1

There is no "male perspective". There is simple inability to see others as humans first and foremost, slut. Take a dick up yours and learn some humility.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 03:59 PM
1

Give what away? What are they giving away? Sex is something people do together, not some currency women "give away".
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 07:54 AM
1

How is it a strawman though, if a girl is so busy reserving themselves instead of having sex and enjoying themselves they must not really like sex. Kinda rapey wanting a girl like that.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 07:49 AM
1

What's wrong with being promiscuous tho Like why are you so afraid and hateful in that aspect who gives a shit how many people someone's slept with if you enjoy being with them? Since when is sex a bad thing? You said you wanted a sexual relationship, so why do you long for someone doesn't want/like sex?
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 07:01 AM
2

No, sex-based literally means "based on sex". How can there be different meanings to this? Takes a real fucking warped perspective on things to say "oh I just meant that it's sexual" to this. Something can be sexual, but not sex based. It can't be the other way around. You being inaccurate doesn't mean it has any other meanings, it just makes you inaccurate.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 07:00 AM
2

They didn't mention marriage tho. And yeah, people don't become nolifers because they're married, they can still have privacy and their own ambitions. You're talking about codependency if people don't even have their own lives in marriage. That's not mentally healthy.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 06:57 AM
2

Well I thought sex-based meant that sex is the most important if not only important part of it from the wording
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 06:54 AM
1

Nobody but you is that hung up in labels like "slut" and "perfect girl". (You said "perfect girl" yourself, in your comments, multiple times.) To demand that she be "somewhat traditional"... 50s housewife? Religious nut? Just a bookworm? Submissive? What do you mean by that? Nobody quite knows, and nobody quite cares, because despite you saying otherwise, it appears you don't respect women and yes, you have some women-hating views. That's my point. The impossible demand is that some magical unic…
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 05:58 AM
2

You said "sex based" not "sexual". "Sex-based" means it's based on sex. No semantics here. Words have meanings, that's not semantics.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 05:57 AM
5

I'm confused, where did they mention marriage?
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 05:55 AM
6

you said your relationship with them was sex-based.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 05:52 AM
8

That's the thing, you have impossible, outrageous demands. The perfect girl doesn't exist. You've slut shamed and paraded your anger at women a lot in this thread. Most women are repelled by that, so if you let that anywhere outside the internet (and that kind of bitterness seems hard to hide), it's natural nobody wants to deal with it. Women run asap from slut-shamers and virgin-chasers and people who don't respect women, because those people can be dangerous. Can you really blame them? They do…
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 05:02 AM
2

<sup>true,</sup> true. Fair point. Still weird that you want a sex-based relationship, but a partner who hasn't had a lot of partners.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 04:33 AM
4

I'm saying real humans don't want sex based relationships. It's pretty much impossible to get a real, live human woman into one with you. It's not a relationship if you treat them as a sex object and demand that they have few sex partners at the same time.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/17 04:31 AM
10

Sex based. Lmao. Like, get a fleshlight? Real human beings don't want that. Sod off already with that.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 10:09 PM
2

Well, caring about that means that you judge their value by partner count. That implies puritan-like values. You've slut shamed a lot here and most women don't like that. It's creepy, like you only want virgins or something. Nobody wants to be judged like that, however many partners they've had. Bad vibe. Not good in a potential partner. You like what you like, you'll just have less options.
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 10:05 PM
3

Well you did make a point about having someone "traditional" — that's what I'm getting at. If you're into both people keeping it sincere and honest and not having sex before marriage, that's all cool, my mistake. You only ever said it to be unacceptable for women, so from that I took it you think it's ok for guys to live hedonistically (since they do?). Never called you a misogynist, that's kind of a strong and overused term, but if you don't view women as equals, what do you view yourself as?
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 06:46 PM
7

Get off your high horse, bitch, law is by no means easier than some of the STEM subjects. You're arguing in this sub - about your view that women are inferior. You're not willing to improve and therefore the only logical conclusion is that you're either really deeply cynical or a troll. Traditionalism always against egalitarianism and you have obvious double standards, because you seem to think the hedonistic lifestyle is ok for men and boys to have (just the amount that fuck everything that mov…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/17 10:47 AM
1

Fuck those women. Come be held in my hairy butch arms
/r/MensRights06/05/17 04:14 PM
1

It's not that weird. Wide hip bones are also there to carry the fatty tissue reserves, which help in providing for the baby/keeping the mum functioning while the baby grows and eats up a lot of nutrients. The actual birth canal structure/hole in the bone might still be getting smaller with the C-section craze? Idk. Theory here for why it might be plausible. Feel free to correct me, anyone with better knowledge of anatomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/17 09:12 AM
2

TL;DR: It all just reeks of trying to bring other women down, pitying her own gender, and disguising it as something well-meaning. That's an excellent reply. I wrote a long thing, whether anyone reads it or not, this is a really important and personal topic to me. I'm one of those ~ empowered (I'll admit, it doesn't always feel that good to be smaller and weaker. The least you can do is not normalize those feelings of inadequacy, no?) straw-women (An Estonian, too. So maybe I have it "too good" …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 09:05 AM
2

What about this implies you struck a nerve? the length of it? I can assure you that is just my blargh style of writing, not agitation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 10:06 PM
1

1) so just how is he supposed to call people/movements out on obvious bullshit if he doesn't explain why he thinks he's qualified to criticize them?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 09:36 PM
1

Oh I have another: People who easily misunderstand things are called dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 09:23 PM
2

I think you forgot how humans work. When we evolved a consciousness and the ability to create and invent, to work tools and farm, women weren't left behind. They were only left behind where anything important could be created and rewards to be collected, because it's easy to step on someones free will when they're smaller and less muscular than you and fear you will rape them. The reason they're smaller? Because smaller ones are easier to overpower and rape, so more small women came from that. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/17 09:07 PM
1

I think that one would be the ENTP. It basically "thinks like a man" (speaking in stereotypes) and often feels disconnected from its female side, is logical, sometimes selfish and socially dominant, contrarian, argumentative at the core. I wrote a post to r/entp on this some time ago and many seemed to relate. Arguably though the ENTP is not as introvertedly stubborn in "being their true self" around everyone, so they camouflage better into conformity. What, in your opinion, are the unattractive…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/16 11:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter