TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BoiledCentipedes Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by BoiledCentipedes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Cool, I don't disagree with anything you said. I'm simply adding that men's problems in this domain are worse than those of women's. That's all. If you can't see that, it's due to your inability to admit that men may have it worse than women in some aspects of life. Analogy time: who is more victimized by rape? I say women. There are more female rape victims than male rape victims. Your comments are similar to someone interjecting with, "Yeah, but men get raped too! No one has it worse. Rape aga…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 06:23 PM
2

My only point is that "different" doesn't tell the whole story. Having 0 options is objectively worse than having many options, so obviously they are different. To merely say that they are different, and to leave it at that, is deliberately misleading.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 05:48 PM
2

Defensive? Close minded? In what way did I exhibit those characteristics?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:47 PM
2

Also men are looking at having more options as a great thing because they are thinking about how much sex they can attain. Is that not the point of hookup apps? Doesn't mean it's all sunshine and roses. Yes, just like how it's "not all sunshine and roses" to have more money than you know how to spend. New yacht? New house? New car? I hate making these decisions! Ugh!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 10:43 AM
2

Hmm, I guess you missed the implicit "/s" in my comment. I was agreeing with you that having a lot of options is preferable to having none.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 01:44 AM
1

Exactly, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:32 PM
3

You see, having more money than you can spend is a different struggle than being broke. But neither is worse than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 06:09 PM
5

The crime divide is male female not along race lines. Can there be more than one divide. A divide exists along racial boundaries, as well as along gender boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:56 PM
8

Are you daft? Literally just google "women's rights" + "India"/"Africa". Do you need everything spelled out for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 05:53 PM
15

saying bald men are deformed You can't genuinely think such a statement would elicit the same response from HR as a statement about women's bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/20 12:04 PM
1

We don’t want to be your sluts. We want to be your girlfriends. Men don't want girlfriends who were sluts for other men but not for them. How hard is that to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/20 12:28 PM
1

A woman’s eggs aren’t entirely non functional as well. No one said this. Both eggs and sperm also have risks associated as the person ages. Yes, but the crux of the issue at hand is how steeply fertility drops as a function of age. Women's fertility drops more drastically than men's.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/20 10:40 AM
4

I wonder why sperm banks stop taking men’s sperm as early as 34 then? Probably the same reason they have a height cut-off. Demand. A woman is not going to voluntarily choose a 50-year old's sperm over that of a 25-year old. Doesn't mean the old dude's sperm is nonfunctional.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/20 04:25 PM
6

It doesn't matter whether a human is inclined to self-apply any such definition to their lives. All that matters is the degree to which the definition actually applies. And the definition of human as "animal" is, to a great extent, true. So, it being "detached" and "clinical" means literally nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/20 12:58 PM
1

Olay, so we are in agreement on the general topic. You're going off on some emotional tangent. ?? Absolutely zero emotion in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:50 AM
1

Okay, think about the situation where everyone is healthy. You're trying to prove your point by saying the best possible outcome from "10 dicks 1 vagina" is better than the worst possible outcome of "10 vaginas 1 dick". If you control for health, the number of females is the limiting factor in determining repopulation. In 20 years, you might have as many as 15 offspring With "1 dick 10 vaginas", you can get 10 offspring every 9 months (let's say 10 offspring per year just to be conservative). It…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 01:49 AM
1

You stand a good choice of the village dying out with just one dick. And the death of your village is absolutely guaranteed with just one vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/19 06:24 AM
1

I think I've seen studies finding a statistical association between N-count and marriage satisfaction (or was it divorce rate?). Either way, it's the same sentiment I guess. And I'm too tired to find them right now, so hopefully another commenter can corroborate or refute my claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/19 06:37 AM
1

Yes, they were. Languages follow a logical structure, or else no one would be able to understand anyone else. It's irrelevant whether the cavemen knew of the concept of "logic"; they were using it nonetheless. In the same way that gravity existed before scientists discovered it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 12:47 PM
1

Well, nothing in your statement added to the discussion other than to call me lame. So...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 12:35 PM
1

What a brainless statement. "Every language was invented without logic". Wtf does that even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 12:33 PM
1

Wrong? How so?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 12:32 PM
4

No need to hurl insults now. Just pointing out that your sentiment (that not all women are capable of being a size zero, which I agree with) is not technically represented by the statement you chose. [Every woman] cannot be a size zero. = [all women] cannot be a size zero. = [X] cannot be a size zero. Substitute any woman for X, since X represents the subset of [every woman]. The conclusion you get is that "ZERO women can be a size zero". Which is false. "Not every woman can be a size zero" is t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 03:21 AM
5

Grammatically correct? Yes. Semantically correct? No. There do exist women who are size zero, so your statement is semantically false .
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 01:58 AM
0

Every woman cannot be a size zero. Not every woman can be a size zero**. What you said means that "no woman can be a size zero".
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/19 12:24 AM
8

Bitterness at not being able to get someone above their SMV applies more to women than men, I'd say.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/19 02:16 AM
21

I was gonna say that cucks exist, but you said "in his right mind", so yeah I agree
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/11/19 04:03 PM
1

No need to be dramatic. Just pointing out that the phenomenon is common enough to be shown statistically when studied. It's more "science" than you concluding the opposite because you personally don't know anyone who fits that bill.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 01:07 AM
1

So, you're placing more value on anecdote than data? That's interesting, but inadvisable. Analysis of metadata from dating sites shows pretty clearly that average men are rated much harshly than average women. So I don't have to personally know a female-4, who's banged a male-10, and now views a male-4 as unattractive/below her.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 08:00 PM
1

arguing that rape laws harm rapists How does this relate to anything I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 07:54 PM
0

Still haven't remotely addressed my questions. You sound defensive. I'm questioning the philosophical justification for a legal prohibition on "lying", because it's getting close to Big Brother territory. My personal situation has nothing to do with it. So you saying I sound defensive in no way deals with the issue. Did you lie to a lot of people, and now you're afraid this law would incriminate you? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 07:53 PM
2

Yes, actually. Why wouldn't Plain Jane have experience with Chad? It takes zero effort for a 10/10 male to pump and dump a 4/10 female. Then that same female gets an overinflated sense of herself (since she fucked Chad, even though she doesn't realize that Chad fucks most girls), and sees 4/10 men as inferior (even though they are both 4s).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 06:19 PM
2

Lying is entirely under my control. If anything it would disadvantage people who are not me. I don't see how that supports the argument that lying to potential mates ought to be illegal (I.e. punishable by the state). The State is already so far up my ass that worrying about another half-inch is silly. Very silly. I'm sure you see the "slippery-slope"-ness of that line of thinking. By your logic the state might as well control every aspect of your life, as long as they proceed a half-inch at a t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 06:16 PM
2

Please tell me how my question was fallacious. I don't think you understand the meaning of the word. It doesn't have to relate to my personal life in order to press charges. Me wanting to press charges against someone who punched me in the face doesn't qualify as "the state intruding on my personal life" to the same extent as wanting someone to be punished (by the state) for saying a benign lie. So I guess I have to rephrase my original question: Why do you want the state to be involved in your …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 06:10 PM
7

Why do you want the state so involved in your personal life?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 04:35 PM
3

Normal women
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/19 04:03 PM
11

The energy from him said that he would pay the bills for her. What does this even mean? Not once did he say he'd pay her bills. He asked if she had bills to pay and to DM him.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/19 02:16 PM
3

Not really. It's because they can't get casual sex even if they tried. To say they are scared of getting metoo'd makes it seem like all these virgins actually have women desiring them and they are just choosing not to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/19 02:46 PM
34

When white men are violent --> white man's fault. When black men are violent --> "sweetie, you have to look at the historical subjugation of minorities if you want to have a nuanced perspective of the issue" --> white man's fault. And I'm neither white nor black, so I have no dog in this fight.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/10/19 04:30 PM
6

A Chad having to resort to escorts for casual sex... hmmm.... something doesn't add up lol
/r/BlackPillScience19/10/19 02:24 AM
25

Also they are less reluctant to resist a Chad's request for bareback. If a Beta asked for bareback he would be shamed into oblivion.
/r/BlackPillScience14/10/19 01:33 PM
2

Well, the fact that you mentioned it in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/19 12:31 AM
0

The main point is that all else being equal, having bastard children sets the child on unequal footing compared to children with two parents. Socio-economic and educational success, physical health, social integration, and romantic relationship outcomes, among others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 07:18 PM
2

who have a completely different set of societal pressures and cultural outlooks than rich Asian kids. Maybe, but don't act like all cultural outlooks are equally valid. There is unequivocally ZERO benefits to having a bastard child over having children with a committed partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 07:14 PM
1

but totally an "aint shit" boyfriend. Everything was 50/50 and I never got a dime of child support. Why would you expect child support if everything was 50/50?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/19 07:12 PM
9

Men aren’t 100% sure of paternity so one of the ways of avoiding the problem of raising another man’s kids is to avoid sluts. This is in our DNA and it manifests as disgust for sluts or high N count. Not everyone has this and not everyone has it to a high degree. Thank you. Finally someone invoking evolutionary theory in a sub that I would expect hinges on an understanding of biological evolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 04:47 PM
1

Different strokes I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/19 11:00 AM
3

When I wasnt studying I still didnt want to go out and readjust my mind, I wanted to chill and go back to it when I feel like it. I'm a law student and I agree with this 100%. The mental toll for taking a "half hour" break is greater than just the "half hour" spent taking that break.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 05:09 PM
3

I'd rather be an average woman than an average man. But I'd rather be a top 1% man than a top 1% woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/19 11:36 AM
1

You do know that pure fucking isn't what the majority of people here are concerned about right? I mean if that was it everyone everywhere would be delighted with how the sexual marketplace is working This is a joke, right? You really think the sexual marketplace is satisfying everyone's sexual needs, and that the droves of incels everywhere are complaining solely about relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 01:35 PM
1

That includes buzz cuts and shaved heads. Thinning hair or receding hairlines aren’t a dealbreaker. So you'd prefer a man who has long but thinning hair (i.e., visible baldspots/scalp) over a man who has short, buzzed hair but uniform hair thickness all around? Interesting...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/19 01:22 PM
1

I'm pretty sure universities and colleges positively discriminate in favour of male students to, though I've seen no proof of this. This might be the most incorrect statement I've ever come across.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 03:13 PM
1

no it's not. are you a virgin yourself? I answered the question with the first word of my response ("No"). you mean hypocritical. Yes, that's the exact word I used in my response. Hypocritical. and yes, you will be judged for it. Fair enough! That's precisely my point. you want a woman to tell you her n count but would you tell her yours and be honest about it? that's the question. Well, that's NOT the question we are addressing. We are addressing whether human beings are allowed to place moral …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 02:53 AM
2

No, but my virginity status is irrelevant to the argument. Even a non-virgin is entitled to hold the requirement that any potential mates must be a virgin. Is it hypocritical? Yes. Is it advisable, from a pragmatic standpoint? No, because very few women remain virgins for long, so I'd be unduly restricting my potential dating pool, and raising my chances of dying alone. But that doesn't change the argument, which is that people are free to place subjective value judgments on human behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/19 02:18 AM
-2

You could've just said "I get the point you're making" instead of vomiting it back at me But the thing is, I don't get the point you're making, because you're wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/19 08:24 PM
3

there's no weird value attached We have the freedom and ability, as humans, to attach moral weight to actions and behaviours. To some people, travelling around the world while homeless is a positive, to others it's a negative. It's not up to you to decide the legitimacy of my personal moral weightings. If I insist on finding a virgin to date, that's my prerogative based on my personal moral compass. Sure, I may end up single and alone because of this unduly restrictive dating criterion, but that…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/19 07:28 PM
20

Races are adapted to their environments Do you think black people just freeze and shatter into a million pieces when they go up north? Or that white people melt into a puddle when they go south? Any infinitesimal differences in environmental suitability between the races is less than negligible in our modern environment.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/19 02:18 AM
7

Men are polygamously-inclined*
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 09:55 AM
1

Such a substanceless comment that I have nothing to grasp onto for a rebuttal. You're either a troll or woefully ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/19 12:06 PM
1

Has nothing to do with women. The femininity or masculinity of a man is assessed relative to other men. If a man falls in the bottom 20th percentile for serum testosterone, he would be considered, to the extent that sex hormones are determinative, feminine for a man. Is there a point to your inquiries? Seems like what I've said is pretty common sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 11:23 PM
1

A relatively higher estrogen-to-testosterone ratio than the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 10:54 PM
2

whereas masculine/feminine is defined by actions. ... plus one's relative proportion of male/female sex hormones. It's not purely a social thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/19 12:59 PM
0

I rarely see a correlation between a guy's feminist stance and success with women. In my experience, the correlation is a negative one. The most ardent male feminists I know personally are the least successful in the dating world (and as an aside, happen to be absolutely sexist and toxic behind closed doors).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:42 PM
5

People are misunderstanding (either willfully or otherwise) the gist of your post. It is an absolute truism that women are more crucial than men (on a one-to-one basis) when it comes to the maintenance and proliferation of a population. Tribe A has 20 women and 100 men. Tribe B has 100 women and 20 men. After a week of sex, Tribe A has 20 pregnant women. Tribe B has 100 pregnant women. After 9 months (assuming no deaths in either Tribe), Tribe A's population has grown by 20, and Tribe B's by 100…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 12:38 PM
1

On average women are better at arithmetic than men. Source for this highly unintuitive claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 08:19 PM
9

So pretty much: humans are most picky at the time of their lives at which "what they have to offer" (female = child-bearing potential; male = resource acquisition) is at its peak.
/r/BlackPillScience09/01/19 01:36 PM
1

given how wildly women vary as a group by their environment. Guess what the only thing that women as a whole have done throughout history, regardless of environment? Yup, rearing children. The nature/nurture debate is a red herring in this particular scenario. Human females, regardless of environment, have evolved to be more agreeable, in general, than men. And this trait doesn't just manifest in interactions with children. Another manifestation of high agreeableness in women is relative unwilli…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 10:09 PM
3

They aren't "socialized" to be agreeable, they evolved to be agreeable. Trait agreeableness is highly useful in child rearing. Women historically assumed the brunt of direct parenting (men indirectly contributed via resource acquisition + caring for the mother). A crying newborn is always right, so to speak. They get what they want. That's why women evolved to be agreeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 02:30 PM
2

Shitty people aren't designated to one gender. Sure, but specific types of shitty behaviour are designated to specific genders. I'm sure you can think of some male-dominated examples of shitty behaviour that women exhibit less often. The inverse is also true.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/19 02:23 PM
1

I'm confused. You're saying that social conditioning is responsible for the vast majority of men having low N counts?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/12/18 02:00 PM
2

Perfect placement for this reference. +1
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/12/18 07:30 PM
20

At least she has no kids
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 01:57 PM
4

"A man provides. And he does it even when he's not appreciated, or respected, or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it. Because he's a man." Gustavo Fring
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 05:33 PM
1

Even so, how would a Men's Day doodle look like? It would probably reflect a feminist's take on masculinity. In other words, a Doodle that "redefines healthy masculinity". LOL
/r/MGTOW19/11/18 05:30 PM
3

You used "0.5" in your calculations. That assumes that women would be okay with a man who falls in the upper 50th percentile for any given trait. But that is a gross overestimation. Women don't want a man who is just ever so slightly above average in looks, dick size, wealth, etc. If you use more realistic values (like 0.2 for height, 0.4 for looks or w.e) then the proportion of eligible men gets even smaller.
/r/MGTOW14/11/18 04:43 PM
2

Wouldn't your calculation lead to 0.09% (~0.1%)?
/r/MGTOW14/11/18 04:39 PM
84

Perfect advice. Having the term "misogynist" flipped onto him will drive him crazy.
/r/askTRP31/10/18 03:28 PM
16

"Average body type"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/10/18 03:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter