TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Bojuric Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by Bojuric on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Yeah they're dumb as shit and r-tarded. I'm saying if you want to attract something more quality. Otherwise you can skip all those steps and just offer them coke if you want to pick the lowest apples.
/r/seduction13/08/22 10:36 PM
-3

Aight tag is fine, somehow missed that. Rolex is a bottomless pit of money that attracts whores. Omega might be better. Invicta is tacky all around.
/r/seduction13/08/22 10:15 PM
7

Lol recommending Invictas and smartwatches. Also h/m is the most basic shit that exists.
/r/seduction13/08/22 08:11 PM
-16

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/22 05:11 PM
0

They'll always target the strongest available individuals to send to the frontlines. It'll always end up being men since you need to leave phisically weaker individuals working and maintaining the industry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 04:08 PM
0

Wrong. Speed, carry weight play crucial role in combat situations. Especially when you need to carry injured soldiers. This is why conscription will always target and deploy men, regardless of political circumstances. And that's why it needs to be abolished. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/the-soldiers-heavy-load-1#:~:text=U.S.%20ground%20troops%20today%20carry,%2C%20batteries%2C%20and%20other%20gear. https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a25644619/soldier-weight/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 03:59 PM
3

Most of men in Ukraine aren't combat ready and they are dead weight. They barely have enough weapons for the traditional army, yet alone for millions of men forced to stay. Anti-conscription stance is nowhere the same as anti world hunger stance. You'll just have a bunch of deserters leaving with your equipment and highly scared soldiers who put others in danger. A trained, proffesional soldier is worth 10 conscripts. https://news.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/cases-desertion-growing-among-ukrainian-10…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 03:53 PM
7

TIL traditional cannot be misandrist lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 03:44 PM
1

So, no conscription because they'll always take the physically strongest individuals?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 03:38 PM
2

Easy, increase benefits so people will want to join the army. You're basically suggesting that the current policy continue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/22 03:35 PM
8

Where do you see that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/22 07:55 PM
2

No, another nutter, I responded to him so you can check. But at least people are more level-headed in the thread you linked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 11:04 PM
36

Roe v Wade overturning is disastrous for men. But terminally shit for brains at r/mensrights think it's a good thing because state rights lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/22 10:46 PM
-1

It's what happens when you let hardcore rightwingers, who have always been anti-male, into the movement.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:38 PM
-14

Dude's legit advocating for worse lives for men because of his "muh states rights". Good luck being able to enter gay marriage and having access to future male contraceptives like the new pill they're working on. Edit: instead of downvoting, prove me I'm wrong.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:29 PM
-3

Foundation where they can ban future male pill contraceptives and gay marriage without any restraint. So much for "mens" rights. Also, good luck having circumcision outlawed.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:25 PM
0

No way this states rights shit could horribly backfire at men, nuh uh.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:18 PM
1

Why would I need feminism specifically for that? First off, none of the feminist circles are advocating for men getting their children. They're advocating for having the best of both worlds. And in which world would a theory in which I'm part of a group that's made to subjugate women give me any leeway in custody battles? I'm de facto an abuser by default in views of majority of feminists. Edit: check Heard vs Depp, all the feminists were still blaming Depp after all evidence because it's the ba…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:22 AM
1

He wasn't to me. He looked like a quack and I wouldn't listen to him for advice. His random twitter feuds are also embarrassing. Chomsky is more precise and, even tho I disagree with some of his takes, I would gladly listen to his perspective. Peterson was slightly less embarrassing than the guy who complained about 'truth' tho, so he has that going for him.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/22 06:12 PM
1

Look at him in the new Matt Walsh documentary. He's shouting like he's deranged. He's no Noam Chomsky. A respectable scientist needs to be able to present his arguments clearly and without strong emotional attachment to them. I don't want to have him on my side because he's dead weight, also his flirting with religion is baffling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/06/22 05:56 PM
2

Feminism says that world is created to benefit men and subjugate women and that men are part of a group that works towards that. Why should I support such theories? Also, thanks for acknowledging that feminism does nothing for men
/r/MensRights02/06/22 11:00 PM
9

How will feminism help bring equality for men?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:04 PM
5

Why should I be?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:35 PM
2

He's mocked for having semi-coherent ramblings about nothing. Not for showing genuine emotion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/22 12:52 AM
1

Let them destroy themselves. After that, pick up the pieces that worked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/22 06:31 PM
1

You do you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 11:11 PM
11

If I had such high standards as you, then I'd have 0 friends left. They're mostly normal people with oddball opinions, not some dangerous ideologues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 09:57 PM
8

Basically saying that you don't want to pay child support and being legally in the green with it. You give up the child and any obligations you have for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 07:01 PM
9

This sub thinks patriarchy theory is bullshit, as well as toxic masculinity, and allows discussion like paper abortion. It's very different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 06:43 PM
23

You can be friends even with people you disagree with. As long as they're not total lunatics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/01/22 06:40 PM
3

Oh bro, it's obvious to other men when other men are red flags. My feminist friend fell in love with a former neo-nazi and a general bully hoping she could change him. She has a thing for bad boys, but hates toxic masculinity. The other one fell in love with a guy who pretended to be a tortured artist by spewing the corniest bullshit so that he can fuck her. He found someone new two days after breaking up with her after fucking her for a week despite claiming that he adored her and that the only…
/r/MensRights06/01/22 08:36 PM
6

It's like Patrick Bateman's sociopathic clique, but for women.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 08:06 PM
1

Women do not have more rights then men. They have the right to their own body, just like men do. Draft, military reserves and circumcision disagree with this statement.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:44 AM
1

Nope, you'll get a fine in Croatia regardless of gender if you're not on the beach.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:32 AM
4

Lol I shared my feelings and it's the same shit lol. They listen but don't really give a shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/12/21 02:42 PM
1

Wanna go watch Deer Hunter?
/r/seduction16/12/21 10:25 PM
316

Bring a documentary about nazi occultism and talk the whole time in a german accent.
/r/seduction07/12/21 02:46 AM
4

Pretty quiet. Probably a bunch of, in feminist views, female/gender neutral traits so he decided to bail. Because he can't find positive aspects of masculinity in his worldview.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/21 03:19 AM
3

Men wearing heels started as a tool for riding horses. Then it was adopted by aristocracy and wealthy so they can be more imposing, a sign of wealth. Also, it's a sign that they're not workers so they don't need working shoes which are practical. Physical laborers are dirty and unpleasant so they want to distance themselves from hard work. Regular men rarely wore them AFAIK. They still have shoes that make them taller, just not heels. Now women wear them because they're generally shorter and peo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 06:53 AM
2

Because regions and different time periods have different material and economical construction? You can try and abolish gender or whatever you call it, but it circles back to biology causing your place in current economical doctrine. Korean economical doctrine is famous for overworking and one of the prime candidates for socialist uprising. Therefore, they need to create pop distractions to entertain the rabble. Having traditionally strong role models is usually associated with rebellion, and th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 04:13 AM
2

Of course they do. Gender is nothing but biology mixed with industrialization rates. It has a very strong footing in objective reality. I mean, that's Marx 101.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 02:57 AM
1

Funny because I saw sceintists say that we must see how omicron affects white people because they're genetically different in some parts before we call the end to the pandemic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/21 02:44 AM
1

He's a shlock of a character that almost looks and talks like a parody. He doesn't seem like a real person.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:46 AM
3

I'd say only one truly relatable is spider-man. There's a reason he's the most popular.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 01:58 AM
14

I think it's more that they're not homeless or severely mentally ill so they don't seek advocacy in that groups. They see those as moral failures, and themselves as let down by the society. Obviously they won't label themselves as moral failures. The only true opression is the one done to me kind of thinking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/21 01:46 AM
34

Men designed a system to benefit them by implementing a legal system that disproportionally punishes them. Fucking kek.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/21 12:09 AM
20

Holy misandry lol.
/r/seduction17/11/21 06:07 PM
1

The fuck has this do with Marxism?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:53 AM
1

Honestly, I never felt that I shouldn't show any emotion. I talked about my problems and sometimes I cried. I never felt that I will be shunned for it. But, the thing that I felt is that no one really gave a shit. They never gave me any emotion back. Just the idiotic you have to deal with yourself shit. Sometimes I got some emotion back but it didn't feel very sincere or long lasting. I don't think that men are forbidden from showing emotions. It's just that they won't get anything out of it so …
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:51 AM
1

It's an insurance for the employee that you have mastered that information and that you can apply it.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 01:43 AM
8

Also, I want to add that industrialization and capitalism are preventing us from ever going back to the old dynamics. Every individual is required to work for a living and to generate profit which fundamentally changes all old dynamics. And for better. But we, leftwingers, want to improve on the main struggle of our age, which is class system. Nobody is going to treat you as a slave and I fucking hate people who are planting those sick ideas in your head.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 03:09 AM
2

Businesses literally hired child labour and slaves when it was cheaper lmao. But they draw the line at women.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 02:14 AM
2

My man, 10 min on woke twitter makes this look like a Pope speech calling for world peace lol.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:57 AM
10

I think he has a very lenient definition of slavery. That's the scare tactics they use to get you into submission to their ideology. I think this is the doomer phase of their ideology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 01:37 AM
1

Strong hormones and idiots with too much money that have good lawyers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 09:36 PM
2

Honestly, that's the only form of discrimination I actually agree with. A lot of good places were ruined and turned into tacky gangster places because everyone was let in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 09:32 PM
2

That's borderline nepotism. It literally ruined my city finances because we're paying a bunch of people for nothing. You create jobs by developing new industries and technology, not by inserting people into useless jobs in an already established sector.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 09:26 PM
19

It's like claiming there is an Asian supremacy because 30% of CEOs are Asian despite being 6.5% of the population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 09:18 PM
1

That doesn't mean anything to me really. Feel free to list their advocacies for me.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 12:43 AM
1

Advocacy for what exactly?
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:29 PM
2

Without feminism it would be completely the same because all those things were the consequence of capitalism.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:07 PM
2

If men, who are the very top, are working 24/7 in order to ensure male supremacy, then you'd probably be verboten to have this conversation. And you wouldn't be hailed by the media. You never see feminism busting like you do union busting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/21 01:20 AM
4

Does that STEM account for biology and medical sciences? I've read that they make up a majority with them. Also, most of those things are completely unreachable for the average man. Idk why women don't go studying business, financing or trade in order to open a business.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 12:47 AM
1

Men attempt suicide way less than women. And those that did commit suicide usually reached out for help before killing themselves.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 02:05 AM
3

Anything that's not economical shouldn't be tied into left or right thinking.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 01:24 AM
7

I mean, you'd just continue the streak, right?
/r/MensRights05/10/21 12:09 PM
9

I blame Bernie Sanders /s
/r/seduction29/07/21 08:13 AM
2

Actually it is possible. My friend just got engaged to a guy she knew and was friends with since she was little. He taught her how to ride a bike for crying out loud. And they've been dating for a year now. What's even more interesting, she is a very similar type as the chick OP described. But I wouldn't put all of my eggs in that basket.
/r/seduction25/09/19 12:34 AM
164

Dormammu, I've come to cringe!
/r/seduction13/09/19 04:27 AM
5

Yes, if you explain her the full benefits of Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism. Instant panty dropper.
/r/seduction14/11/18 12:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter