TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BomanSteel Archive

View 0 posts and 133 comments by BomanSteel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Ah, fair enough then.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 09:59 PM
1

I simply wouldn’t label myself with any type of pill. If something has a good idea but constantly executes it poorly and the execution gets worse over time, Id put as much distance between me and the thing possible. Hell by your logic most terrible movements are semi valid because there ideas weren’t bad but executed poorly
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 07:12 PM
1

Do you think the RP movement intentionally intertwines itself with figureheads that are misogynistic since the 2010s? Why or why not? Do you think the RP movement’s strategies/proposed lifestyles have gotten better or worse over time? Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:52 PM
1

I want a counter argument, you hopped on to a discussion thread, said RP is mainly a self improvement strategy that incidentally get intertwined with misogyny, I pointed out how the movement intentionally ties itself to these misogynistic elements in ways that undermine the “strategy”, you implied I was generalizing, I gave a timeline of the movement during the 2020s to show I wasn’t, you rebutted by saying the movement existed before Tate, and I pointed out how that doesn’t help your point beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:39 PM
1

You haven’t presented a single fact to me to refute what I say, you just keep saying I don’t know what I’m talking about and refusing to elaborate. Saying “I just wanna believe what I wanna believe” after refusing to engage is peak Projection. If you don’t wanna present counter arguments then cool, but don’t act like it’s my fault this discussion isn’t going anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:11 PM
1

I’d argue Rollo was part of the problem. Not only was he hypocritical (I doubt the advice he gave to men was the same advice he used to get with his wife), but his advise on how to be a “high value man” was so bad I distinctly remember everyone roasting him for it. Iirc he was telling dudes to get a vasectomy as part list of things you need to do to be a high value male. I think the advise holds up relative to the current advise I still don’t think it’s that good for what it was trying to do. Ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 08:26 PM
1

If that’s all RedPill has cooked up after over a decade of existence the Holy shit. “This just in everyone! People like dating people that look good!” And the worst part is, shit doesn’t help men actually get what they want time (unless what they want is just getting laid)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:21 PM
1

I know it’s been around. I’m old enough to remember when the advise was halfway decent. But y’all do let the influencers spearhead the movement to popularity before the movement falls all because the influencer’s advise isn’t that good. Like I said, regardless of how long RP has been around, don’t act like it didn’t immediately latch itself onto Tate when it saw the chance
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:08 PM
1

I know RedPill has beeen around before Tate, that’s the problem. The movement rises up with the popularity of a figure head, the figurehead gives dubious advice, the figure head falls off, for whatever reason (mainly because the lifestyle they’re preaching isn’t one their actually living) and the cycle repeats. And with each retreat the advice has devolved, so again I say. “The strategy doesn’t fucking work” Edit: also wild to say I have a rudimentary perception of RP when RP since the fucking 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:05 PM
2

This is disingenuous. Tate clearly spearheaded the Redpill movement until he got sent to prison, and very few people RP adjacent pushed back on that/diasagreed with it. When Tate got imprisoned he “passed the torch” to Sneako and F&F, the movement shifted, but again, few people contested this. Clav is pretty young so I can’t say he’s “spearheading” the movement the same way Tate and previous RedPill “leaders” were, but he just stepped into the vacuum that occurred when all the older people fell …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 12:21 PM
3

Except the RP is Dogshit at describing how things “play out”. Hell I’ve seen at least 3 RP movements rise and fall in real time and the advise on how things “play out” devolves each time
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:35 AM
1

Considering the movement keeps popping up and is semi lead by people like Andrew Tate, Fresh and Fit, and Clavicular. Seems like that strategy ain’t working
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:33 AM
5

Since yall are extremely pedantic and tend to focus on minor nits: Bro your the one in the debate sub, don’t get upset when people wanna dive into the weeds And again, I agree that friends and family fulfill some of social needs, but not the romantic one. I don't want to argue how important it is, let's just say it is, if it's not for you - good for you, it means you are not suffering from loneliness. Especially when you say shit like this. You say you don’t wanna argue if it’s important but hal…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:01 AM
–

Crazy how people will spend 9-10 years auditing something and you're willing to say they all "blew all their credibility" . Would you say the same about the RP movement? Cause it's common knowledge the figure heads from the last wave were terrible people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 02:34 PM
–

Except they’re founded on the same ideas, so no, not really. Red and blue pill are “completely different”, black pill is just Red pill: ultra nihilist edition.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 10:30 AM
–

Oh please, most of the RP movement was glazing everything Tate said right up until he disavowed them. And Tate probably would’ve continued acting like he was with the RP movement if it wasn’t falling apart while he was in jail and being tied to the movement might’ve been used against him. You can say he’s bad and maybe you never rocked with him. But don’t act like he wasn’t the face of the movement before he got arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 10:27 AM
–

Wow…a whole 20 year old, You managed to bag someone who’s not even legally allowed to drink in the US I’m sooo impressed… Lemme update my statement: I’m not tryna hear relationship advise from someone copying Drakes dating methods. You’re not cool, your…well Not Like Us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:15 AM
–

I feel like if he did he wouldn’t have made the post. Guess we should apply Occam’s Razor to OP as well
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:25 AM
–

You heard me. The red pill is dogshit and most the people who peddle it are either criminals (Tates), hypocrites , or in your case, the physical embodiment of “who hurt you” I’m not tryna hear advise on women from a dude clearly still mad about a divorce
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:23 AM
–

Not to mention F&F who became actual Jewish conspiracy theorists It’s almost like bigotry was tied into the movement from the start, cause that’s what happens when your movements’ figure heads are heartbroken losers and actual pimps…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:16 AM
–

The worst part is, despite the bits of truth it doesn’t even work. The Tate brothers who restarted the movement in 2020 now disavow it and are actual criminals, 99% of the people who peddled the shit are either hypocrites or bitchless, and despite a very toxic view of women and how they act in relationships, they still needed woman for validation. They are literally the male version of the hyper misandrist “feminist” that talks about how men suck in one breath and how lonely they are in the next…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 05:11 AM
–

As opposed to red pillers like you who are constantly checking their testosterone levels to distract from getting divorced
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:29 AM
–

"If the JQ wasn't accurate, Jewish people would not be trying to censor it so aggressively" If white supremacy wasn't accurate, people would not be trying to censor it so aggressively" Etc.. etc... See how dumb your logic is? People don't wanna wait for "The market place of ideas" to hopefully show that the hateful shit people say is BS. Not only does it make people more hateful even if proven false later on but the misinformation might not even be decisively disproven even if it is actually fal…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:22 AM
–

That is the new n-word. Wanna know why your statement is BS? Cause you says "woke" and "DEI" just fine but then says "the n-word" cause even you know there's a difference . People be so thirsty to claim something is "the new n word". Like anything will compare to a word with that much history just cause it hurt they're feelings
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:14 AM
2

Meh, in moderation I don’t see the issue. As long as your still able to function well in social and romantic situations porn is probably fine. Either way what do you want me to replace pornstar with intermittent fasting advocate? If we’re just gonna invalidate my example by saying the advise is objectively false then what’s the point of the argument? Do I just get to say it doesn’t matter what validated OPs advise cause the advise if objectively false?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 08:31 PM
3

Depends on the advise In your example, if he mentioned “yeah it works for me, but I’m different because xyz reason” then yeah the advice is still valid In the current situation, talking about how great they are when you have a history of saying how great they are in spaces that aren’t appropriate does impact it’s validity. Cause it just sounds like your looking for more reasons to talk about it. Another example: if a former porn star talked about whether porn was good or bad I don’t think it imp…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 07:06 PM
0

Nah post history is a fair attack angle depending on the topic. For example if someone is talking about how buying escorts is based and you see they brag about it a lot on unreal subs, it’s fair to say they can’t give an unbiased take. If someone say they posted on a Genshin sub and immediately ignored their argument then it’s not fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:18 PM
1

When Tate is basically the head of the movement and damn near every red pill figure glazed him and still glaze him to this day I think it’s fair assume whatever you considered “bastardized” was the mainstream opinion. If Tate, FnF, and Sneako were the figure heads of the movement why would I assume I’d find differing/more nuanced opinions if I dived into the forums?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/24 03:06 PM
1

https://preview.redd.it/3dhjxdx7vjvd1.jpeg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d77415c1f976de93212228e8836d285e75bf5a03
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 05:29 PM
1

https://preview.redd.it/3dhjxdx7vjvd1.jpeg?width=234&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d77415c1f976de93212228e8836d285e75bf5a03
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 05:29 PM
–

I think it goes both ways. Depends on where you grow up now honesty. California? Wouldn’t surprise me if woman sucked there, though I’m biased, I lived in the South where it’s more equal (enough people believe woman deserve equal rights or are too poor to get weird about it) and damn near everyone told me the west coast sucks
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:07 PM
–

If we wanna say it’s a systemic issue, don’t trace something systemic to “women fucking deadbeats” your just kicking the blame from the criminal to the criminals mom. The issues are multifaceted and no one individual can be blames, that’s why it’s called a systemic issue on the first place. Example: maybe the mom fucked a deadbeat because she was a rape baby, her dad wasn’t present and her mom lowkey hated having to raise her. Maybe the only reason she chose to raise a kid she didn’t want in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 04:03 PM
–

Honestly, fair. If I had my shit saved better I’d do the same. Also never said their perfect, quite a few are either crazy or morally gross. But I don’t believe most people think that it’s ok when woman do it, for every one that’s fucked with me I’ve usually had 1-2 that’ll have my back
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:19 PM
–

Depends on the father
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:14 PM
–

Only when they’re younger, it changes as they age Guys like crazy chicks so it’s not like we’re any better. How does that address the core of my point? The point that misandry isn’t perfectly acceptable, you really just wanted to post that study you found huh…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:14 PM
–

I’ve experienced misandy too in the real world, and no it’s not “perfectly socially acceptable” Normal people don’t like assholes, male or female
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:04 PM
–

It is on Reddit
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:03 PM
–

Again, we’re talking about systemic issues. And you wanna bring up fucking? It shows where your head is at when you think about gender issues
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:03 PM
–

Or maybe, just maybe this is advertised as a debate sub and y’all are treating it like a circlejerk
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/24 03:00 PM
–

That’s poor wording on my part, lemme be clear. I don’t think it’s worth analyzing things using biological instincts as the lens. Your instincts can be changed due to environmental factors that evolutionary biology can’t account for. Like yeah, we may have a drive to reproduce, but if you live in a city with poor water quality then that drive isn’t that strong, or if you grew up with lots of extracurricular activities maybe you channeled that drive into things other than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:32 PM
–

See, I just don’t fully believe that that’s the problem. I think the people who talk about the “sexless men” issue don’t have the other forms of intimacy in their lives and they’d find fulfillment and maybe have an easier time getting laid if they pursued the other forms of intimacy first. I can agree family bonding can’t replace friendship bonding , which can’t replace romantic bonding, but the dudes that talk about this generally don’t have a good bond with their friends or their family and ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:26 PM
–

But it’s not just that, we mate for pleasure, it’s not always about spreading genes. Plus, biological instincts don’t really matter anymore. There’s thousand of other factors to think about why a person wants something before we look to biology. Especially considering environment affects our biology to some extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:09 PM
–

Then just look for the other forms of intimacy then. You said it yourself, your not always gonna fill the hole in your heart with sex so stop using it as a proxy for intimacy. Either y’all need sex in a way that’s not normal for most guys or you want personal connections/intimacy and your advocating for it in the worst way possible by conflating it with sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 12:06 PM
–

Bro please don’t make me steel man a eugenics argument. I was just saying we shouldn’t place so much importance on sex because of “spreading genes”
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 11:13 AM
–

But that’s the issue, the arguments are about sex being important. If everyone said male loneliness was an issue, then there’s not much to disagree with. But most people here are arguing that they need sex as much or more than a personal connection. My counter to that is if you just need sex then beat your meat, most functional adults don’t need a steady supply of sex to be mentally stable. And if your looking for personal connections, then that’s not male sexlessness, and you should focus on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:43 AM
–

Do they have a manic incels detector? No. Can they usually tell if someone’s a manic incel from social cues? Yes Also why do specialty need woman to handle our issues just beat your meat
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 07:22 AM
11

Either as a gendered issue impacting women are a general issues impacting people researchers will study things like loneliness. Males loners are studies insofar as they are considered dangers and threats to the social order. The main reason why we don't care as much is because of a general lack of empathy for male losers, in my view. I think it’s just because being lonely is a universal issue for our generation dude. I’m not gonna pretend that it’s not at least a little bit fucked up that women …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:20 AM
2

What do you mean “we can only substitute it for so long”? Like how long do we got? What happens when we reach the limit? Do we know when we’re about to hit the limit, like an internal timer? Im genuinely curious about the way you think our balls work, cause my dry spell has gone on pretty long and I haven’t felt the urge to go crazy yet, y’all acting like you can only go so long before you need the real thing is starting to sound like a skill issue to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:42 AM
25

But for decades now there has been a notable sub discipline within feminist academics about something called the "orgasm gap". Wikipedia has a page on it that serves as a useful primer. A quick google search yields numerous articles from around the world in serious mainstream news sources, prominent blogs, Scientific American, publicly funded universities, and science journals on the subject. So, this lack of sexual pleasure many women experience is seen as a pretty big deal and has been for a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 01:32 AM
3

So you can get desensitized from jerking off, but not from actual sex with a partner? I’m not seeing the logic here, it seems like in both cases there’s a chance of things getting stale. I’m guessing the “dissatisfaction” is coming more from loneliness than a need to bust a nut in someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:33 PM
4

No, because genes are affected by environmental factors. You can breed the 2 most genetically superior humans on the planet and make super babies and it won’t mean shit if the air quality they grow up in sucks, or they aren’t well fed, or if the mom is sufficiently stressed out while she’s pregnant. That’s why I’m saying there’s more to life and sex than just genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:10 PM
4

No, it’s really not. We just sequenced a reference human genome like 2 years ago and like I said, until we figure out epigenetic factors to your genetics there’s no way to accurately predict who’s gonna spread certain bad genes. Genetic diseases maybe, but even then it’s not always right
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:03 PM
3

I know, that’s why Im not for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:56 PM
4

Yeah, I’m not rocking with that. I, glad your consistent in your thought process but there’s more to life and sex than spreading your genes. Especially considering what we’d count as a good gene is subjective, and we still haven’t figured out epigenetics well enough to start accurately sorting
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:54 PM
9

Or we couldn’t just….beat our meat instead of getting weird about needing sex? I feel like we’re skipping steps when we start acting like sex is an essential need like we can’t “handle” the problem ourselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:45 PM
9

That’s not really a good argument, if the importance of sex is derived from “spreading genes” then shouldn’t it be argued that being selective is good? After all you don’t want to propagate bad genes, if it ends a blood line, then oh well should’ve gotten better genetics to spread.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:39 PM
16

There’s different forms of love, the connection you have with friends and family are arguably more important than the connection you look for with a SO. Why does everyone here act like every guy starts tweaking if they go without sex for too long? That says more about y’all than anyone else. Just beat your meat like every other functional man.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:37 PM
1

If you can explain how exactly I’m wrong then maybe I won’t report you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:35 PM
5

Ah, so troll. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:33 PM
–

Right then I just checked you link, This data doesn’t prove your point. It’s a post about if black bears are dangerous. You even lied, you said “per time spent in proximity” in a previous post but this article doesn’t bring up anything about that, you’re just talking out of your ass on that point. This is basic stats manipulation, bears are less likely to kill people than men because most people don’t encounter bears everyday. if everyone in the world had to spend like half the hours of the day …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:18 PM
–

OP I feel like your making a LOT of wild assumptions and conclusions based on some biased sampling and anecdotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 06:20 PM
3

We don’t have a vast multitude of standards. We’re mostly just visual I don’t think that’s true, its “just visuals” for sex, the standards go up to near woman level when it comes to an actual relationship. Woman (usually) just don’t fuck people they wouldn’t also consider dating, which makes sense because there’s a disproportionate amount of risk on the woman’s side for both dating and fucking. I’m just saying there are observable patterns in reality that are true for most cases. But that’s a bo…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:33 PM
1

If you don’t fit the implication, ie your just acting chill minding your business. The negative connotations loses its meaning The negative connotations loses its meaning, because people can clearly see, that the person calling you a virgin was trying to imply something that doesn’t match your behavior. Did a google search and it agrees with me about the definition of "mansplaining", and it's basically just tone policing bullshit for when...a man is explaining something. Some of them have "but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 09:15 PM
1

Way to not engage with anything I said, lemme try again. The label loses its meaning if the negative connotation doesn’t fit. Being a virgin isn’t inherently bad, when people call you that, it’s because they’re trying to imply something else, usually that your a virgin because of something about your personality, or you act (derogatory)like someone who doesn’t have sex. If you don’t fit the implication, ie your just acting chill minding your business. The negative connotations loses its meaning,…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 03:16 PM
–

You should really check the definition of "safety" that appears in Maslow's hierarchy. I did check, and yeah, that's fair I was wrong on that. You aren't going to die without shelter either, hobos live on the street for decades, does that mean that need for shelter shall be excluded too? Id argue a hobo *does* find shelter, or at least they'd die without it. They may live on the streets but they still need to find some kind of place to sleep and keep their stuff, or the weather would kill them. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:38 AM
1

you weren't elaborating, you were just wilding. Now you're just going to pretend calling a man a virgin has no negative connotations? Now when did I say it had not negative connotation? I distinctly remember saying that if you're minding your business the word loses its sting/meaning. Same way everyone overused the word simp. A word like virgin doesn't mean much if it's used on people just being chill. but like I said, dont think someone like you could pull that off. Ok good to know mansplaining…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 05:15 AM
1

I apparently have thicker skin that you, because you’ve been Red pill raging since you started replying. Also you didn’t just said no because people react to what others say, it was a whole ass paragraph. But to argue that point, if everyone’s calling you virgin and your just minding your business, I doubt everyone’s gonna look at you like your the bad guy. But I doubt you’d be able to contain yourself, you’re getting heated by nothing at all. I’m mansplaining because I’m a man explaining ….red …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 11:25 PM
–

Ok I refuse this notion that we should include the need to reproduce as a physiological need. 1. Because it doesn’t make any sense, if “reproduce” is at the bottom of the pyramid it implies you want to have a kid before you have safety, which is absurd, 2. Because your not gonna die, without it, a virgin can easily achieve all levels of the pyramid without “reproducing”. If anyone genuinely needs sex the same way they need food and water (ie. They cant live a healthy life without it) that implie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 11:15 PM
–

I was talking about Maslows hierarchy of needs…. They really don’t. We’re not cavemen, we can be driven by things other than the need to multiply. “Non sexual bonding” (just call it friends and family man) should be before a relationship, at least it should be now. Again, we don’t need to “multiply” the instant we get financially stable. Plus how do you plan on maintaining a healthy relationship if your going to be dismissive of forming healthy friendships? What happened to the phrase “your part…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:28 PM
1

I’m a man, nice try WTF ARE WE EVEN TRYING TO ARGUE ABOUT! You actually sound like your stereotype of a woman, because I have no flicking idea why your so many, and your not telling me. You legit sound like a girl that would get dragged on F&F. WHAT ARE YOU MAD ABOUT?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 09:08 PM
–

Maybe if you didn’t resort to calling people narcissistic cunts you wouldn’t be here on Reddit “speaking on broader social trends” and actually start being one of the winners Also, again assuming what I’m talking about from like 2 sentences. And getting mad about those assumptions. Are you good bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:26 PM
1

I think calling the desire for romance toxic is bad for sure. But being able to be happy by yourself is good. It helps with finding relationships in my opinion. I’ve seen way too many couples stay together for no reason other than a fear of being alone. Learning to be happy by yourself can help you find the right one, because you won’t settle out of fear. In those cases yeah, it does solve everything, but the cases you mention the person is mostly put together, my issue is that some guys will ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 08:26 PM
1

I somewhat agree(I think) a relationship should be a mutual thing. But the two people need to be able to be independent. Personally, I wouldn’t be comfortable if my partner’s life totally revolved around me, they gotta have their own things going on. Then the compromises would be actual compromises. Also a relationship isn’t gonna fix everything, or at least your partner would have to be a specific type of person to be able to do that. Your partner is just that, your partner, your significant ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:19 PM
1

It can still “get to you” but my point is to not explode over it. For example: Boomer and Karen could be compared to virgin as an insult (it’s used to imply certain bad character traits) if people started to just dogpile on old people trying to mind their business by calling them Boomer, the word would lose its meaning, The same way SIMP did. It may still get to you to be called that, but the key is to make the word lose its meaning by not getting explicitly upset over it. A “can you not?” Or a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 07:00 PM
1

That’s quite the assumption from like 2 sentences… How about trying again? Maybe asking what I think instead of man’splaining my own opinion?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:52 PM
1

Definitely the last one. I think a major issue with guys is that they think a relationship will solve half of their problems, lonelinesses and a lack of purpose in particular. I know it’s a meme that guys will still be good friends even after not talking for years but it’s kinda sad if you think about it for a sec. Like you should talk to your best friend for more than once a year. Or they think having a relationship will give their life meaning when that’s just a gateway to codependency. Point …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:37 PM
5

There’s more to a relationship than fighting and fucking. If you can’t be bored with friends your gonna have the same issues with a girlfriend. The sex will only delay the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 06:24 PM
0

That’s fair I guess, I’d argue your making the single life seem more lonely/boring that it can be, but if you want a family then it’s fair to want that but then I’d argue OP wasn’t talking to you since you clearly know what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:42 PM
0

It really couldn’t. It’s an insult based on an immutable feature, whereas insults like virgin or incel are imply there’s a reason your not getting laid. Assuming every black person stopped caring, you’d still look like a weirdo for throwing that insult around. Because again, your insulting someone for their skin color, if people stopped caring about the virgin insult it would imply your a virgin for reasons that don’t involve “because your personality sucks”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:41 PM
1

Again, haven’t seen it, you could be right. But I imagine they had to go through some type of character arc before they found the right man. Like they needed to become someone who could attract and keep the right man. But yeah, you can yearn for a relationship, but nobody knows which loneliness is which and a lot of people seem to default to needing a relationship, when they haven’t even mastered the skills needed to maintain a friendship. Your partner should be your best friend, after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:37 PM
2

It’s security actually, and friendship is on the same tier as sexual intimacy in terms of needs
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 05:34 PM
1

Might as well...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:43 PM
1

Because most people don't know the difference between general and romantic loneliness. Most people can't tell the difference between love and lust/a crush. So you should try getting a friend before diving into a relationship. Also I've never seen Sex and the City, but I get the feeling your description is off.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:42 PM
1

What, you don't give the homies a bro-job😂 But fr, what's wrong with friends you aren't fucking? We kinda need those too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:37 PM
0

How do you know you're missing a void of love if most people haven't even tried filling the void with friends or a sense of purpose in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:35 PM
0

If you can't build a life on you're own, how do you expect to build one with someone else? The implications sounds codependent
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:33 PM
0

It's used as an insult because it works. If people didn't get mad about being called a virgin it would probably lose its sting.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:31 PM
2

You need sex more than friends? Thats honestly kinda sad you think that.... Were social creatures last time I checked and friendship/social interaction is way more important than just sex
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:27 PM
1

It's also irritating to assume someone is toxic for level headed advice like "go find some fucking friends"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:21 PM
0

Why are you acting like you need to be married and shit to "build a life"? Just build your own, your life isn't on pause just because you're single
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:18 PM
0

If you need romantic love the same way you need food and water, that implies some type of mental issue. You're not gonna die if someone isn't head over heels for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:15 PM
3

If it's boring with friends, what do you expect to do with a girlfriend? Be bored together? Can't you do that with a friend?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:14 PM
1

I don't think OP was saying friends are a replacement for gfs, if anything is the opposite, men try to find relationships to fill a void that you should fill with friendships. If you can't learn to find a friend how can you hope to keep a partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/24 04:10 PM
10

That….says more about you that you think that applies to all guys. Not everyone is willing to risk it all for some intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:29 PM
7

How very…..”American“ of you….
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/24 02:24 PM
1

Oh wow I wasn’t even expecting a study for the numbers part. I figured that proving social stigma and risk would be a difficult thing to quantify. Testosterone levels correlating with masterbating in women sounds right. Like it probably doesn’t correlate to guys as much because most guys already masterbate a lot, and if a woman had abnormalities large amounts of T she may go from solo sex to finding someone. That being said it is important to factor that even if women have less T in their system…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:39 PM
1

You said you see the same excuses, mainly slut shaming and an inherently disproportionate amount of risk involved with women having sex. If you consider those “excuses” then what do you think the real reason is? If your going to dismiss some pretty important factors in this situation as excuses then you must have an idea of the cause in mind. So skip the “why won’t people acknowledge this” part and just say what you think it is and some proof to silence any doubts. then we can focus on solutions…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 10:31 PM
0

You don't know that. You posted the major issues about the disproportionate risk women have as excuses but if that's not the reason then what is?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 09:01 PM
0

So how much is some? A majority? Less than a quarter? Also, if the disproportionate amount of risk on the women's side and the still tangible fear of slut shaming then what is the make factor?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:48 PM
2

If these "excuses" aren't the reason men are hornier, then what's the reason? If we know the reason then we should be able to come up with a solution right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:30 PM
6

It's not a matter of "hunger", it's a matter of risk assessment. Same thing that partially dictates the market right now. A guy decides to sleep with a crazy girl cause he's horny and he gets a fun story to tell the boys. A girl decides to sleep with a crazy guy cause she's horny and she risks getting killed or pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:25 PM
1

Your right, my bad. Let me rephrase myself. 100% of misinformation spread is by women, unless you count the small percent of men that act as an accomplice. Instead of trying to deny this fact, you could help me make things better for society at large!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:03 PM
1

I’m kinda happy, I get to confirm that your a truly awful person who spreads misinformation about sexual assault. And that you contribute to the problem men and women have through gross negligence or intentionally. I’m honestly half convinced your a bot or a psyop. Either way, I hope your removed from these conversations for blatantly saying wrong things like their facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 02:30 PM
1

99%?! Your just wrong, or your lying. The number is probably pretty high, but the fact you had to make it 99.99% for whatever reason shows you have a toxic view of men and perpetrating a victim mindset for women. Even when the numbers should favor you, your exaggerating them to make men look worse, and that’s just gross. And to reiterate, perpetuates this idea that every man is a predator in waiting that women have to always worried about. How about while men work on whatever issue we got, you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 10:30 PM
1

Idk what to tell you other than. 1. You’re wrong, 2. You have a toxic view of men, and 3. You’re perpetuating a victim mindset for woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:28 PM
1

I would be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt if it weren’t for the last sentence in his post. It’s so…childish, ironically. Citing a study would help too, I’m sure there’s at least one that analyzes something like this, and it would help prove his point if people tried arguing with the science.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 09:25 PM
1

I do, but I don’t condone it. I did a of shit to impress girls in HS cause of that feeling (not to this extent though). but by undergrad I moved past it, got female friends, learned there’s more to life than women and getting laid. It’s a created mindset but that just means you can create a healthier one. Healthier than this at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 08:50 PM
1

That’s good, you should keep fighting. A situation can bother you, but 1. this just ain’t the place to complain, it’s a debate sub and 2. I doubt OPs fighting like you’re going to. An unfair situation should motivate you. But ranting about it on a debate sub is not the move, and implies the situation broke you instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 08:45 PM
1

Being horny or sexually frustrated is not an issue, It’s a thing that happens. Are you implying men are dangerous just because we get horny?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 08:22 PM
1

Ohhh, I thought you were trying to justify/condone his complaining. My bad
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:50 PM
2

So? Lots of toxic mindsets are created. Doesn’t mean it’s good or that you shouldn’t work to change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:42 PM
2

Even if I grant you that, which I’m not sure I should, but I don’t have evidence on hand so sure, what good does posting it do? It’s like complaining about the government(in the US) on Twitter. It doesn’t help, and you can do your part to help fix it instead of posting rants. It shows it’s a think that bothers you a lot, and your probably using what’s said as a sort of excuse for why you don’t get girls. Even if it’s facts it’s a defeatist mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:41 PM
1

Men can absolutely suffer mental health issues and they should be taken seriously. But what causes them says a lot about you. And if this is all it takes, then getting laid should be the least of your worries. Also, your admitting that anyone who loses their mind from lack of sex has underlying mental health issues like I originally said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:19 PM
2

I don’t have an exact name for it. Weak-willed? Victim mindset? Whiny? Whatever works best. But commenting that women have the upper hand and that men need them because of xyz reason and blaming biology of all things isn’t the mindset that gets you girls. Instead of complaining about why it’s happening, he should focus on how to overcome it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:16 PM
5

Because it’s pathetic? Like how can I, or any guy call themselves a man if a lack of sex destroys our mental health. It seems kinda weak to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:08 PM
3

Both are the result, they correlate. Someone who posts like this had a mindset that won’t get them a relationship/sex life. The mindset of someone who posts like this isn’t gonna be popular with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:03 PM
2

Hold up, You can be sexually frustrated and not dangerous. Just because your horny doesn't mean you turn into a predator. It's rude to assume someone is not a good man or dangerous solely based on sexual frustration
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:43 PM
8

It's because he posts like this that he has no relationship or sex life. You don't get girls with this type of mindset
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:35 PM
9

Because if you legit go crazy from no sex you have other mental issues. The no sex just brought them to the surface. Nobody should be legitimately losing their shit over not having sex
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 06:33 PM
1

Ok so lemme get this straight. Rich people, as in people who (for the most part) have strong leadership qualities, and the type of mindset needed to make lots of money don’t have good genes…. And that women select for mostly physical traits. Your also implying that a tall college dropout on roids (ie tall, muscular, and strong) has a better chance at getting a girl than a guy with a steady job, but is has glasses, a beard that prevents them from knowing their bone structure, and a bear build (lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:57 AM
0

That is not true. Fertility and birth rate decline with GDP and wealth. If anything poor people tend to have the most kids while rich people with the “good genetics” tend to have only one or 2. Also what exactly are the “good genes” they select for? How do they know they have them? Genes activate and deactivate depending on environmental factors so surly they’re paying attention to who you are as a person rather than any genetics you may have. Especially since there’s no way they could account f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:33 AM
-1

Lacking empathy? Do you hear yourself? Men and woman go through different types of struggles, even if I grant you the idea that woman suffer less rejection and disappointment than man (not sure if that’s true but I’ll roll with it for now) That doesn’t mean women don’t suffer in ways that would force them to become well adjusted adults. Rejection and disappointment isn’t the worst thing in the world. We’re all experiencing some type of struggle, and accusing people of lacking empathy because “re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:21 AM
1

Lacking empathy? Do you hear yourself? Men and woman go through different types of struggles, even if I grant you the idea that woman suffer less rejection and disappointment than man (not sure if that’s true but I’ll roll with it for now) That doesn’t mean women don’t suffer in ways that would force them to become well adjusted adults. Rejection and disappointment isn’t the worst thing in the world. We’re all experiencing some type of struggle, and accusing people of lacking empathy because “re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:21 AM
0

Your fighting a straw man here. I don’t see anyone here saying that men need to grow learning how to treat a lady. I’m sure most of the people here would agree that’s part of the problem. Also teaching women to be nice, emotional, and grateful? First off we can teach women to be honest direct assertive AND nice emotional and gracious. They aren’t mutually exclusive. 2. Those women already exist. 3. Why were you implying that we can’t do both? And why did you pick “being grateful” over being hone…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/24 12:14 AM
7

​ After becoming influencer and showing off my lifestyle, car and muscles maybe I'll get a trad woman You're joking right? Your not gonna get a trad woman by showing off your wealth and flashy status symbols. If you really want a trad woman then get off the tren and get in church or something. You won't find your ideal trad woman on Instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:25 PM
1

​ You're taking "biology" too literally. Nurture and nature are to be opposed here, you believe nurture is responsible for sexual dynamics and it is even more improbable than to believe nature causes it. That is *not* what I'm saying. Nature and Nurture are very intertwined, Your nature affects how you nurture someone/something. My point was that you said we were animals and should compare and contrast with other animals when applicable, and I don't think any comparison with any animal is applic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 07:20 PM
1

Rape and consent are human concepts, don't do anthropomorphism on animals you don't understand. Should I use "force themselves on their partner then?" consent may be a human concept, but chasing down your partner and going at it until their injured doesn't have a more accurate description other than rape. ​ That's not even that common in the animal kingdom you are misinformed. Turns out I was misinformed on the types of animals that do it, not the commonality as a whole. It still happens enough …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 05:53 PM
1

It’s also common for every male species to kill the kids that aren’t theirs and rape their partners. We aren’t animals, we shouldn’t use biology to explain why men bang anyone. It’s more cultural imo. We made having lots of woman or a high body count a status symbol, more so than cars or money. And now everyone thinks they have to have lots of sex to validate being a man. We need to place more value of self-improvement for its own sake, rather than the act of improving just to get a girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/24 12:48 AM
1

Well don’t leave us on a cliffhanger, give us detail!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 07:20 PM
1

And who are you that you're so perfect you expect everyone else to have all their problems solved before they're somehow worthy of receiving love and affection? You're being too broad here. Nobody decides if you're worthy of love and affection, but they do decide if they want to give you their love and affection. Most women don't expect you to "have all your problems solved" but they probably expect you to not be emotionally immature. If you're "performing to appear mentally stable," then by def…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/24 11:38 AM
0

I feel like you’re missing the point. It’s not about being vulnerable in a way that pleases women it’s about being mentally stable enough to be vulnerable in a good/healthy way. If you have to perform to appear mentally stable, then I don’t think it’s fair to say the girl is the issue in the dynamic. “Women don’t want to see you don’t have your shit together” I mean…yeah. I feel like that’s fair. Your girlfriend should only be expected to help you with so much emotionally, and I feel like “deep …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:51 AM
0

I don’t even think you have to necessarily sugarcoat your feelings just don’t go trauma dumping. And yeah, a lot of guys (myself included) have/will let a girl have as many emotional outbursts as they want, but as guys we don’t have to do that. I’d argue that we shouldn’t put up with that. Your girlfriend(assuming it’s serious) is your partner, if she expects you to have your shit together, it’s only fair we expect the same from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 10:18 AM
0

I don’t think I buy this. I think a lot of guys mistake “being vulnerable” with “treating your gf like a therapist”. Girls want emotional intimacy, they don’t want to find out their boyfriend is actually an emotional wreck who hides it with stoicism. The line between vulnerability and pseudo-therapy obviously depends on the girl, but that’s an important distinction to make. I highly doubt a girl is gonna get a huge ick, because you cried when a friend or relative died or something like that (and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/24 02:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter