TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

BootyMessiah Archive

View 2 posts and 185 comments by BootyMessiah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lack of compliance and respect are the only ones. The rest are a giant psyop
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:30 AM
-1

Yes, it sounds like you wouldn't be compatible with a woman who is capable of leading her own life and doesn't need another person to lead her i.e. the vast majority of women. My girlfriend doesn’t need anyone to lead her yet she lets me. Weird how that works. This doesn't mean that if you find a woman who is willing to follow your lead that it would be a HEALTHY relationship. It would be a relationship that suits you, that doesn't make it healthy. A relationship has to work well for both people…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 10:14 AM
3

Why would you? He is a grifter and a criminal who fake peddles Islam and promotes & encourages illegal activity. Goes against rule zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:56 AM
-1

If a woman isn’t willing to follow my lead or add value to my life in a non transactional manner, we are not compatible. If a woman isn’t giving me exceptional support and add significant value to my life while I give her leadership and add significant value to hers, what good is she?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:53 AM
5

What is the “TRP movement“?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 09:06 AM
0

Those that try to inject things like race realism, politics, religion, feminism, debate, illegal activity, grifting practices or the concept of absolving men of accountability and shifting the blame towards women or feminism are to be shunned. Rule zero is outlined pretty clearly there bud.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:59 AM
3

PUA is just an outdated late 80s, 90s & early 2000s caucasian rip off of “Game” & “Pimping” that was taken over by white nerds & autists
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:55 AM
-1

Andrew Tate & Jordan Peterson are not Red Pilled. They go against rule zero Those that try to inject things like race realism, politics, religion, feminism, debate, illegal activity, grifting practices or the concept of absolving men of accountability and shifting the blame towards women or feminism are to be shunned.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:52 AM
1

Who is me? This is Rian Stone & Rollo Tomassi word for word bar for bar
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:49 AM
-1

Flat out, 90% of the worries brought on by many of the users here wouldn’t be a concern in a healthy relationship. Yes but everyone has their own idea of what a healthy relationship is. It is a subjective concept. For me, it’s the man leads and the woman follows. The man knows who he is, what he wants and what he won’t tolerate at all times and the woman follows his lead and adds value to his life in a non transactional manner. That’s a healthy relationship. Some would disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:24 AM
1

The purpose of the red pill is to discuss men's identity, sexual strategy, and options in the context of our current global culture for the benefit of men. Anyone who does not share that goal must be banned the instant they are detected. Red Pillers are not interested in debating or defending their experiences to those who disagree with the red pill, nor do they want to clog up their threads defending the morality of their choices. This is rule zero. Red Pillers here are not following rule zero …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:54 AM
2

I’m literally an adult male with a body count over 80 and multiple social circles. Granted I have a gf. I don’t care that any of my attractive & stable friends are single. The losers I naturally got rid of after my early 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:37 AM
2

Single 5.5/10+ men are not going to be ostracized by couples or work environments for being single, especially not single 6.5/10+ men or 5/10+ men with money or status. Wake up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:34 AM
1

The top 50% of men is not “human reality”? Okay love
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 10:04 AM
2

I have a question for you since you seem pretty familiar with the lifestyle, how do you go spinning plates without nurturing any form of attachment? Be direct and upfront about what you want, reward the women who are cooperative. What do you decide if one of your "plates" starts to show signs she wants something committed? Evaluate how cooperative she is and either respectfully remind her of how it is or move forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 08:31 AM
2

Every aspect of the gynocentric order already has alternatives to save women from not being able to execute their solipsistic & hypergamous impulses at every angle. Now they have been entangled into the economy and federal government, no man can escape it. Even if you don't have kids. Even if you aren't married. Even if you are self employed. All men will still be paying into the system to help all women execute hypergamy. This is so much deeper than most people and even RP/BP men understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:28 AM
0

Any man who is opposed to being on their purpose, spinning plates & tricking is 110% pedestalizing some 3/10-5.5/10 pussy that will never truly be his
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:18 AM
2

Beta bucks married 3/10-5/10 men are not getting any type of preferential treatment over single 5/10+ men with status & resources. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:09 AM
3

Perennially single men are the vast majority of men, especially when you include sexless, female run beta bucks marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 06:05 AM
0

You’ll find out one way or another
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:59 AM
0

I’m sure those mid-sub 5 virgins are doing quite nicely for you. Their low body count won’t save you from being mogged & cucked by Chad & Chad Lite
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:57 AM
0

<image> Only ran through 3.5/10s-5/10s for you I’m afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:52 AM
1

<image> Cares. If you are a man in this range it was over before it began.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:44 AM
-2

<image> Women who look like this can have any 5-10-5.5/10+ simp of their choosing. And the 5.5/10+ ones can have any 6/10+ simp of their choosing. We are not the same Every aspect of the gynocentric order already has alternatives to save women from not being able to execute their solipsistic & hypergamous impulses at every angle. Now they have been entangled into the economy and federal government, no man can escape it. Even if you don't have kids. Even if you aren't married. Even if you are sel…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:41 AM
0

Women are not moral, virtuous & marriable and sub 6.5/10 men should quit expecting them to be
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:39 AM
-2

You belong to Chad & desire to settle for some Chad Lite with resources. I wish you luck. I’ll be fucking compliant 3.5/10-5/10 mongoloids & tricking for 6/10+ models. <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:34 AM
2

Yessir
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 05:20 AM
0

Continue to cope
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 04:50 AM
1

<image> If she’s a 5.5/10+, you’re paying unless you’re Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 03:08 AM
-4

They belong to Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 03:01 AM
-6

<image> If you look like this it’s over I’m afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 08:15 PM
-2

Chad & Chad Lite chart sis. You belong to them
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 08:11 PM
-18

In practice, wives make sure their husbands eat healthier, go to the doctor, follow up appointments, decrease alcohol, cigarettes, vaping, marijuana, etc. They also make sure their husbands eat healthy, home cooked meals, encourage physical activity, get adequate sleep and decrease stress. Only for Chad
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 08:10 PM
-10

Only Chad & Chad Lite I’m afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 07:47 PM
-2

How about you just do what seems good for you, and let other men decide what kind of life they want to live, including being married, having children and maybe facing a divorce. That life truly only exists for men who are a 6.5/10 in looks or greater. It’s over for the other 95% <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 07:46 PM
-9

Every sub 6.5/10 man in existence. The married with kids, happily ever after life only exists for Chad & Chad-Lite <image>
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 07:37 PM
3

That’s $100k over 18 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 07:35 PM
1

Because they don’t have game. They don’t who they are, they don’t know what they want, they aren’t direct, they don’t have boundaries, they tolerate bullshit & disrespect. They don’t enough awareness to recognize if someone genuinely likes them. They don’t have enough awareness to recognize whether or not they are being manipulated, used or taken advantage of. They are too weak to stand on anything. They don’t have confidence. They don’t see themselves as valuable. They don’t see themselves as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/24 08:15 AM
1

Those compliments getting you laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 08:45 PM
1

Have legitimate reasons for going to the gym that eating healthy, walking & push-ups couldn’t solve. You’re going to the gym for women and women can smell the sucker on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:34 PM
1

If a man’s top 2 reasons for working out, eating healthier and going to the gym are “live a longer, healthier life” and “be more physically attractive to women”, that man is pretty much a sucker. Like do powerlifting competitions, do a recreational sport. Take up rock climbing, rugby, tennis or golfing. Have legitimate reasons for going to the gym that dieting, walking & push-ups couldn’t solve. Do something other than “I want female validation”
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 05:25 PM
1

The IT nerd should do it because he has athletic/physical hobbies and interests outside of the gym. He should do it because he’s interested in a second job as a personal trainer. He should do it because he wants to live longer. Should be pretty obvious. If he’s doing it just for women he’s likely going to stop or quit. He cares too much of what women think or find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/24 04:08 PM
5

Yep. Doing anything for women or female attention/validation as opposed to for yourself is simp/trick/sucker behavior. An IT guy with no athletic hobbies who goes to the gym and eats healthy to be more attractive to women has a simp mindset and will always do poorly with women. A firefighter or personal trainer who goes to the gym and eats healthy to be better at his job and live a healthier lifestyle will never have issues with women. Same thing goes for making money, becoming stable and advanc…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 10:42 PM
4

RP podcasters don’t even speak for the RP, let alone all men. RPers believe 4 things and each aspect of their ideology/praxeology is centered around these 4 concepts: Society is gynocentric & heavily influenced by feminism Women are solipsistic & emotional. Briffault's law. She’s not yours, it’s just your turn. Women are hypergamous. Briffault's law ctd. Women want a man who is better than them in some way, shape, or form Women treat different men differently. Alpha fucks, beta bucks. A woman wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/24 07:06 AM
2

She needs to find him sexually attractive? And he can only know that by being direct & upfront with her about what he wants (sex).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/24 05:09 AM

It’s literally trick shit, don’t bother lol
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/24 09:53 PM
2

Because they’re beta males dawg. The only female “friends” a man has are close acquaintances. Family friends, girlfriends’ friends, friends’ girlfriends, in-laws, classmates, dorm mates, neighbors & co-workers. What woman is going to get wet for some loser trying to befriend and wear down their way into some pussy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 12:31 PM
2

Men are loved for who they are. The issue is 85-90% of men don’t know who they are or what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:18 AM

Men quietly (or maybe loudly) play a status game against other men around who is with the most exclusive catch of a woman. They want their friends to think their woman is not only extremely desirable, but very choosy, and she chose him - making him very special. A winner. I disagree. Only “beta males” view women in this way. They value beauty and purity. Those who possess “alpha tendencies” are extremely competitive due to various insecurities. “Alpha males”, who have dealt with plenty of beauti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/24 07:07 AM
5

It doesn’t matter what women as a whole bring to the table. The only thing that matters is what an individual man wants his partner to bring to the table. A better question is to ask yourself “what do I want a woman to bring to the table?” Then begin vetting for that woman. For me it’s genuine attraction, compliance & stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/24 01:42 PM

If only women judged men this heavily for simping, tricking & entering relationships too soon in their past.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:56 AM
3

My first thought is it should tell any man she says that to that she isn’t genuinely attracted to him. But I really don’t give a shit about this sort of thing. If I made out with/got a blowjob from a 24-29 year old woman on the first date and slept with her on the second date, I’m not going to give a fuck if I found out she slept with other guys the day/night she met them when she was 18-22. I took girls out to lunch & dinner dates when I was 16-19 and haven’t done it since. Would I want my fuck…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/24 08:45 AM
2

Bone pressed for all
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 10:04 PM
1

It’s very important. The scalar relationship it has to height is undoubtedly the main reason many women target or prefer taller men, with the second reason being bedroom dominance and the third and fourth being “safety” & “genes”. Basically the vast majority of the reason women target height is sex related. A 10-20% taller than average man (6’2”- 6’10”) may not be more likely to have a big penis, but he’s unlikely to have a small/average one and he’s probably going to have a penis that is 10-20%…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/24 06:12 PM
2

It is the man’s fault, even in the situations where the woman “puts on an act”, never implied it wasn’t. But that’s still not going to stop men who intentionally deal with gold diggers or shallow women from becoming bitter in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 03:23 PM
2

Not really because even men who are “happy” with gold diggers are likely to become bitter after or towards the end of the relationship, as by then they can no longer cope or be in denial about anything and likely even find her unattractive, which was most likely the reason they tolerated the gold digging to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 02:14 PM
3

Multiple reasons They are simps & tricks who do not care about whether or not the woman is genuinely attracted to them, at least not until it is too late. They make so much money or are so driven and self-reliant that they simply don’t care if they are used. They pedestalize beauty. They could care less about genuine attraction or intimacy. They want sex with a woman they find attractive. They want to show her off. They want her to give them attractive children. Etc etc etc. Simping, tricking an…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/24 11:31 AM
2

Because they typically fizzle out quicker than monogamous relationships, which already don’t have a very high success rate. The only successful long term polyamorous relationship that I’ve ever seen is Mr. Locario, a dating coach from New York who is a member of the YouTube & social media Manosphere and hosts various podcasts/live call in shows. He’s been in an open marriage with his wife for 17 years and an open relationship with his girlfriend for 7 years while he sees multiple women per week/…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 09:44 PM
0

Again, what does that have to do with going from a shitty profile to a good profile and significantly improving your result? I swear y’all are cucks worshipping bulls
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/24 03:56 AM
0

Meanwhile guys with shitty profiles are still getting 2-10x more matches by not having shitty profiles, so I don’t really know what your point is. Going from 1-3 matches per day to 2-30 is better than nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 07:32 PM
-5

Dating apps don't work for the average guy, lets not kid ourselves here. 90% of men have shitty dating profiles. Plenty of normal guys with low quality, below average, mediocre, weird, boyfriend vibey photos, bios & prompts who then do an “after” where their photos, bios and prompts are high quality, interesting and give off player vibes. Their number of matches increase by 2-10x. Even going from 0-3 matches per day to 2-6 is a lot. When I changed my profiles back in 2020 my results went from 3-…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 05:06 PM
2

At that point no, I didn’t want sex. Then you weren’t genuinely sexually attracted to him. No idea why you’re making an exception for him and not for me I’m not making an exception for him, he can move how he wants because he’s supposed to lead. But he also should have made a move on the second date. We’ve been together for a year. We have sex 3 times a week. Again, seethe and deny if you can’t handle that. First guy in my whole life that consistently makes me orgasm. Super obsessed with him. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:53 AM
2

Again, if you didn’t want to have sex with your boyfriend on the first or second date, you aren’t genuinely attracted to him. If the only reason the two of you didn’t have sex or make out on those two dates was because he didn’t want to, that’s on him. The fact of the matter is you will eventually begin holding out sex from him or will begin having transactional sex (if you haven’t already) because he waited a month and your relationship was built on dates & taking things slow and not genuine se…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:40 AM
3

Were you a teenager? Did you make out with him on the first or second date? Did you want to have sex with him on the first or second date? Would you have been down? If not, you can make all the excuses you want, you are not genuinely sexually attracted to your boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:21 AM
0

If you’re referring to first (or second) date hookups and fuck buddy situations, those are the only ways for modern men to gauge whether or not a woman is genuinely sexually attracted to them and not using them for attention, comfort, stability and/or resources. Just the way it is. If she’s not at least making out with him on the first date, she isn’t into him. Men don’t want to be used or settled for and that’s the optimal way they prevent that.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 10:10 AM
3

Looks matter, particularly for approaching, make out sessions, one night stands, social media messages & dating app matches, but they don’t guarantee first date hookups or fuck buddy situations. That requires game & good sex. Plenty of good looking guys out there who give off boyfriend vibes (even in dating app/social media photos) & can’t fuck. Most men are losers who will tolerate disrespectful, uncooperative and red flag ridden women who are poor in bed just because they are pretty/cute/beaut…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/24 08:07 AM
8

Women who have good relationships with their fathers are typically the 2nd most difficult to deal with (after women who have poor relationships with their mothers) due to being spoiled, competitive & helicopter parented. Men who date them are constantly being compared to their father. Men who give off boyfriend vibes are going to be less likely to have the type of backbone to be able to handle that if they have any type of ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 09:40 AM
11

Yeah that’s not gonna help the honest & kind guys giving off boyfriend vibes
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 09:23 AM
23

It has less to do with wholesome or kind men and more to do with those types of men being more likely to give off boyfriend vibes. Men who give off boyfriend vibes make many mistakes, with arguably the biggest and most common being talking about relationships or potential relationships or envisioning themselves having a family. Do not talk about those things with women you are dating, especially not before you’ve developed good chemistry where she is very cooperative, submissive and responsive. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 02:16 AM
1

So why do it for a woman who isn’t a friend or a client?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 01:31 AM
1

Would you open doors for a man?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 03:30 PM
1

By knowing who you are, knowing what you want, knowing what you won’t tolerate, loving yourself, putting yourself first, never putting a woman on a pedestal, never being afraid to lose a woman and never doing anything for women. Most men who are obsessed or become obsessed with “self improvement” do so for the purposes of attracting women and not living a more productive, easier and better quality of life. When you do it for women, it doesn’t last, when you do it for yourself, it lasts
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 09:48 AM
1

No, if you were a loser before you became high value and you don’t change your mindset, you’re just a high value loser So many men who struggle with women will hit the gym, improve their looks and focus on their career only to still struggle with women (or become unprepared to deal with surface level women) because they still lack experience and aren’t focusing on improving their mindset/worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/24 07:02 AM
-1

Self improvement for women is betabuxxing yes. It is also tricking, simping & being a sucker. Doing anything for a woman or with a woman that you wouldn’t have done on your own or by yourself is betabuxxing The game is not to be argued
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 11:41 PM
2

Betabuxxing is doing anything for women as opposed to for yourself. Betabuxxing is doing anything with a woman that you wouldn’t have done by yourself solely because you think she would like it. Taking a woman out on a date because you think it’s something she would like is betabuxxing Spending more time with a woman when you don’t really want to because you think it’s something she would like is betabuxxing Increasing your looks, money & status in order to get more attention from women is betab…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/24 12:53 PM

Black Pillers look at just as much data & research as Red Pillers and the vast majority of modern Red Pillers are obsessed with SMV & “Frame” & “Red Flags in women” compared to Red Pillers of 10-20 years ago. Red Pillers have insulted themselves as the growing number of Red Pilled and Red Pill Raging beta males lean more and more towards the Black Pill. The RP was not intended for beta males & incels, it was intended for beta males with alpha traits & tendencies, men who can actually get women
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 02:00 PM
2

Looking back it was probably the way I worded the last paragraph and the use of the word compliant throughout the post. Many feminist and girl boss women don’t like that term. Also, there are probably a few men who gave off boyfriend vibes too early during the vetting process or didn’t have a 12-18 month vetting process who didn’t like the post either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 10:44 AM
1

Regardless of whether or not it is all or most, everything the Red Pill & Black Pill speaks on revolves around feminism “weakening” society and “blinding” men, women being solipsistic/hypergamous and women giving different treatment to alpha males vs. beta males.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/24 06:42 AM
1

If all Black Pillers believe women are shallow, and only deal with physically unattractive men for resources, then by definition all Black Pillers believe women are solipsistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/24 09:18 PM
17

Red Pill: Believes society, particularly western society, is gynocentric and dominated by/highly accommodating towards 2nd, 3rd & 4th wave feminism Believes all women are inherently solipsistic (selfish, shallow & self centered) or at the very least hypergamous (want someone who is better than them and/or someone whose lead they can follow and who they cannot easily manipulate) Believes all women treat “alpha males” (men they are most sexually attracted to) differently than “alpha males with bet…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 11:11 PM
-5

By being direct with women, starting every relationship with casual sex, vetting a woman properly for 12-18 months and not being afraid to lose a woman, especially if she is not compliant or cooperative. All relationships should start off as being “fuck buddies” for 3-6 months. A man has to know if a woman is sexually attracted to him from the get go. Sex is fundamental, it is nature. If a man has sex with a woman for the first time and soon afterwards she’s asking for things outside of sex, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:24 PM
5

It’s only true for men who only categorize women as “wholesome good girls” or “promiscuous bad girls” This is because they aren’t experienced enough to understand that all women enjoy sex and all women can be promiscuous. There are no “good girls” and “bad girls”. There are no “wholesome girls” and “sluts”. All women are sluts, were sluts or have the capability to be sluts. All women are how they treat a man, which is either be compliant or not, follow his instructions or not, sleep with him fre…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 09:11 PM
-1

It’s never over. Men can always self improve and change their mindset, but it gets more difficult the older you get. An 18-25 year old with little to no experience can always easily self improve and learn game en A 26-33 year old with little to no experience will have more difficulty self improving and changing their loser mindset in order to learn game And it will just get worse and worse with every 8-10 year age range
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 10:19 AM
0

All 3 points revolve around women, bud. My argument remains the same. Gynocentric and feminist society = women Female nature being solipsistic & hypergamous = women Women treating alpha’s differently than betas = women My argument never changed. All 3 points revolve around women. RPers make their lives about women and the nature of women because the 3 founding principles of the RP and being RP revolve around women And the degree to which someone agrees with or obsesses over the 3 beliefs is what…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:24 PM
1

Red Pillers make their lives about women and the nature of women. Alpha males don’t. Can an alpha male agree with all 3 points? Yes, do they obsess over the 3 points the way a RPer would? No If RPers are calling Pimps, Macks, Gigolos, Kept Men, Players & Concubines/Breeders/Bulls/Studs/Swingers “purple pilled”, RP spaces are flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:16 PM
1

Successful alpha men do only agree with half of them. You think an alpha male truly gives a fuck about gynocentric societies, feminism, marriage stats or the solipsistic/hypergamous nature of women? No, he’s only interested in if a woman follows his program and is not interested in being married, monogamous or starting a family until well into his 40s or even 50s, if at all
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 07:00 PM
1

That’s exactly what the RP is. Anything you bring up is going to revolve around those 3 points. From Iceberg Slim to Ross Jeffries to Tom Leykis to ARC to Tucker Max to Dante Nero & Patrice O’Neal to Mens Rights to MGTOW to Rollo Tomassi.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 06:53 PM
1

There’s a significant difference in the way a woman will treat a good or average looking mack, player or ladies man vs a good looking guy who gives off boyfriend vibes vs a decent looking guy with money who gives off boyfriend vibes. Women will have sex with all 3, the way they treat all 3 will be different. The mack, player or ladies man will receive better treatment than the good looking guy who gives off boyfriend vibes The good looking guy who gives off boyfriend vibes will receive better tr…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/24 02:04 PM
10

In order for someone to be Red Pill they need to believe 3 things: -Western Society is gynocentric and dominated by feminism (most alpha males & players don’t believe or care about this) -All women are solipsistic or at the very least hypergamous (the degree to which an alpha male or a player will agree with or care about this will vary, but for the most part they will agree that women value confident, self-assured, assertive men with leadership qualities) -Women treat men they are sexually attr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 09:25 AM
16

Most women date 5’7-5’11” men who make $50k-$90k per year. Get outside and touch grass. A woman’s preferences mean nothing, just like your preferences mean nothing. You might want a woman with a pretty face, big titties, slim waist, big ass, has a career, is compliant, is respectful and adds value to your life. The woman you end up with might not even have half of those things and the only ones you should really concern yourself if you consider yourself a man with substance with are the last 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/24 08:45 AM
0

Women don’t have standards, they have preferences. Standards come from those in a position of power and authority. Women don’t have power and authority over men, only males, and they seek men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/23 07:17 AM
2

Why is she even dating me? Why would you date you? Who are you? What do you want? I have to be perfect; one mistake and she’s gone. You don’t have to be perfect. A woman who is genuinely attracted to you will let you get away with many mistakes. She might be my one and only chance ever. No she won’t Is she going to use me for money? How would she know you have any money if you don’t lead with it and you only focus on what you want from her? She probably has like 5 other guys she’s talking to. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/23 03:03 PM
2

Man if I hit a woman up and she isn’t making time for me she’s not interested. If a woman is interested she’ll make time. If I ask her when she’s free this week and she’s giving me some “can we do next week?” she don’t like me like that. That’s resistance. I tell her to let me know when she wants to or is ready to see me and I move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 08:44 PM
2

Not exactly sure what #3 means. Could you be more specific? I’m assuming it means don’t associate with a woman for more than 2 weeks if things haven’t gotten sexual or she isn’t taking instruction. In that case, I would personally give it 1 week, if not less. Rest is all good, aside from 1. I would just ignore and let them watch from afar. No need to be too petty.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:00 PM
2

Game is and always has been about having a masculine or “alpha” mindset. Even back to 1966-1967 when Iceberg Slim wrote about it. It was always a thing in black culture about being a man, being selfish, staying focused on what you want and having a specific and effective way of moving through the world. It was about “standing on your square” and “standing on business”. It was never about women. Game is not about picking up women, getting women to stay or getting women to like you even more. If y…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 09:51 AM
2

Tricking is paying for sex via money or gifts. A prostitute is someone who has sex in exchange for money or gifts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 05:05 AM
0

That’s trick cope. There’s a big difference between finding a hookup or going on a date that costs $0-$100 vs paying at least double or 60x that for a few hours or a night of sex via money or gifts. A date can lead to 3-7 hookups per week and finding a woman who invests in you. A trick pays every time
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/23 04:43 AM
1

Players keep a harem of girls because they do not care about looks, they care about compliance, acts of servitude and an ability to follow instructions. The more a woman adds value to the players life without having to ask, the more seriously the player takes her and the more she becomes his top girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:54 PM

You should hear the stories male strippers tell about women. These women will literally suck these guys off & have threesomes/orgies with their future mother & sister in laws during bachelorette parties
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 06:38 PM
2

When I was in my early 20s, I got a lot of matches, dates and hookups on apps but the women I met in person were more attractive and compatible. The women I met in person were also less flaky. Later when I began to use better photos, had a better sense of style, and more of a direct/self-centered/masculine mindset I got more matches, dates & hookups with attractive women online. I also did FaceTime calls to reduce flakes and ensure compatibility. Hinge was also a game changer and I found it far …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/23 10:47 AM
2

The Red Pill and the manosphere in general are centered around 3 beliefs. 1.) Western society, the media, the economy and all of societies institutions have become dominated by 2nd, 3rd & 4th wave feminism and as a result of this women have become more masculine and independent. Men on the other hand, have either become simps/tricks/weaker OR have remained traditional/family oriented/monogamy focused in a society no longer suited for that lifestyle. 2.) All women are inherently hypergamous in so…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 09:35 AM
2

The things fuck buddies said to me when they were begging me to spend time with them and I was encouraging them to go on some nice or fancy date with a quality guy. Nothing is quite like a woman telling you she wants to spend time with you while you know some sucker just hit her up and wants to take her out for an expensive time out. Get her away from me bud. Otherwise I believe nothing that comes out of a woman’s mouth. My favorite words to hear are “please” and “thank you”. My favorite thing t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 01:35 PM
6

While I agree money & resources trump everything when all other things are relatively equal, this doesn’t ever mean men should lead with their money or pedestalize women. Men should be showing off their wealth, not spending their money on a woman. Taking a woman on a fancy or expensive date isn’t going to have as much pull or garner as much attraction as inviting her out on your boat or over to your nice place in your nice neighborhood
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/23 08:56 AM
0

She sought out another man. Okay then, you were right for ending it. Because it's clear to me that she doesn't know what she wants, and her indecisiveness impacted the trajectory of my life. She’s supposed to want what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:40 PM
1

No. In this case, it clearly mattered, because I read her reason for straying. Im confused. She strayed from treating you like a king? Also, this was a fairly long relationship. For the first five years, my ex probably thought she could ride it out for the rest of her life, but her craving intensified. I think one of her new friends had something to do with the shift. Once again I’m confused, she shifted away from treating you like a king or shifted towards treating you like a king? Looking back…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:27 PM
0

Once again, women don’t pedestalize, admire and pamper you if they’re not attracted to you. Was she having sex with you as often as you wanted? Was she respectful? Was she compliant & cooperative? Did she take instruction well? Did she prioritize you? Was she performing acts of service and giving gifts? Those are the only things that matter. Who cares if she finds other men more physically attractive if she’s doing what she’s supposed to do. As long as she’s not fucking them it doesn’t matter
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 06:05 PM
1

though she always treated me like a king. Women don’t do this if they’re not genuinely attracted to you lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/23 05:46 PM
1

Why make her my girlfriend after 3-6 months when I can just not make her my girlfriend, vet her for 18 months, and do 80% of the same shit I would do if she was my girlfriend for those 18 months? If she’s not doing what she’s supposed to do within that 18 months, I break up with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/23 08:22 AM
2

No man should be officially entering a relationship with a woman in under 12-18 months. Even the most experienced and high value men should be waiting at least 9 months. People can put on an act for 6-9 months, they can’t put on an act for double or triple that amount of time, especially if things are not moving as quickly as they’d like
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:20 PM
1

No man should make a woman his “official” girlfriend (someone he lives with, invests significant amounts of money into, introduces to his family, friends, acquaintances or posts on social media) until he’s dated her for 12-18 months. 2-4 months into their relationship she should be begging to be his girlfriend. At which point he lays down the ground rules, his boundaries and what he truly wants from a relationship. 6-12 months into their relationship she should be begging him to make her his “of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 11:13 PM
5

They are investing in themselves (hygiene, gym, style, self-sufficiency), improving their social skills, building their social circles, not overthinking and being direct with the women they want to be with as opposed to indirect. They are finding their niche. They look for women who like guys like them and frequently put themselves in environments where they are more likely to find those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:50 PM
-1

So quick question, if a woman’s value decreases as a potential partner the older she gets Who tf is saying this? Beta males? she should wait 18 months for someone to decide she is worth the title of girlfriend? She can get at least partial girlfriend treatment within 6 months, I’m just not making her a major part of my life, significantly investing in her and introducing her to my world as my girlfriend until 18+. Shit, would you introduce your kids to someone you only knew for 2-9 months? Also …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:31 PM
8

Women are usually the ones wanting and begging for relationships & official titles after 2-6 months of dating, not men (or real men, there are a lot of desperate losers out there) I can’t think of a single woman I took seriously enough to officially label as my girlfriend or partially live with or intentionally introduce to my family or friends or post on social media within 18 months of dating. The vetting process should take a long ass time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/23 09:23 PM
1

In all aspects of your life, in all situations, just ask yourself two questions. “Who am I?” “What do I want?” All your conversations should be centered around who you are and what you want. Talk to someone for 1-5 minutes and then tell them what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 10:47 PM
1

In order for a man to be “high value” for a woman he must have beta values, desires and tendencies, therefore he is not truly alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 05:45 PM
4

Yes, but that doesn’t mean they don’t find these men physically or behaviorally attractive. The only type of woman men should really beware of is a woman who is attracted to him due to his resources
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 11:03 PM
6

Women need to be sexually attracted to someone to have sex with them. This means they need to be attracted to some combination of the persons looks (face, height, physique) appearance (hygiene, sense of style) and behavior (confidence, assertiveness, directness/straightforwardness, mindset, demeanor). Women do not need to be sexually attracted to someone in order to have a relationship with them. They only need to be attracted to the person as a friend, attracted to the persons behavior and/or a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 10:48 PM
1

She doesn’t have to do anything she doesn’t want to do and I don’t tell her what to do unless it relates to me or she is around me. She can go out with her friends. She can have guy friends. She can post provocative images on social media. None of that shit has anything to do with me. She is her own woman. But if she’s not cooperative and stops adding value to my life, I leave. If I tell her to get something or do something or see me on xyz days during the week or see me at xyz times on certain …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 08:34 PM
3

“High Value Men” are monogamous, or at the very least marriage focused and family oriented. Alpha males are not. Women prefer to have relationships with Alpha Males who have Beta values, desires & tendencies and Beta Males who have Alpha traits & tendencies. They want their dream man and if they can’t get their dream man they want someone they don’t feel like they’re settling for. These are “High Value Men” “High value man” is a term and concept created and popularized by women so that alpha mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/23 12:04 AM
0

I don’t want to be with someone who is argumentative, disrespectful or won’t follow my lead. Nothing wrong with that. My current girlfriend of 2 years isn’t like that at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 11:36 PM
-2

Yep! That’s how she earns my genuine love and affection. That’s how I know I can trust her. That’s how I know she can add value to my life. After the first 18 months or so I’m a little less picky about not doing small things, but early on it’s my biggest indicator of whether or not I want to move forward in the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/23 04:31 AM
3

Most of them are likely inexperienced, traumatized or worry about things out of their control and outside of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 01:35 PM

Most men are oblivious to both how judgmental they are and how much women dislike judgmental men. They have no game. Taylor Swift and Astrology are both topics that are easy to joke about without being judgmental. Just let them expose their judgmental nature and either move on or move accordingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 10:11 AM
1

Almost every woman I know would happily give most guys with a good personality a chance, regardless of their status or physical appearance. I get what you mean but this is why I always tell women to be specific when they refer to a man’s “personality” When women refer to guys who have “a good personality” or say they care about personality, they are often referring to a guy’s masculine mindset, his behavior and his level of game. They are referring to his confidence, assertiveness, directness an…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 09:37 AM
-2

Disrespect towards me, attitude towards me, non-compliance and obesity. That’s it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/23 07:08 AM
2

When is a woman actually good enough to commit to? -When a man realizes she, an attractive woman, also finds him genuinely attractive. -When a man sees that she wants a relationship with him more than he does with her. -When a man realizes that she respects him -When a man sees her being consistently cooperative -When a man sees her performing acts of service for him and giving him gifts. -When a man sees her investing in him and adding value to his life. This typically occurs over a period of 9…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 10:47 PM
0

Most women are category 2 & 3 and being a slut isn’t a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 09:17 PM

Those are still category 2 women. Having sex with a man you don’t know is truly invested in you is a slutty moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 08:59 PM
3

Well you’d have to define promiscuous. Men often classify women as hoes or prudes. Sluts or good girls. It is much more nuanced than that. In my experience there are 6 types of women. 1.) Women who will only engage in sexual relations with a man who is their fiancé or husband. Good girls 2.) Women who prefer to only engage in sexual relations with a man who is their boyfriend, but will occasionally engage in one or a few brief episodes of non-monogamous sex while single (a few one night stands).…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 07:25 PM
2

Usually yes. But some physically attractive men go after women below their looksmatch for an easy lay. And if anything these men can get more upset due to the perceived difference in attractiveness making feel more entitled to her body. Those men being physically attractive doesn’t make them sexually attractive. Sexually attractive men know they can get laid. But yes, physically attractive men who don’t know how to maximize their appearance or be direct,, confident and unapologetic in their beha…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 07:11 PM
3

Physically attractive men, behaviorally attractive men, sexually attractive men and resourceful men are more likely to approach attractive women and give them more positive experiences, yes. The type of men to lash out at unattractive women when rejected are usually sexually unattractive themselves. A sexually attractive man knows they can find sex somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 06:58 PM

Experienced women usually want experienced men. Experienced men are rare and a significant number of experienced men want inexperienced women. Inexperienced men usually want inexperienced women. Inexperienced women are rare and a significant number of inexperienced women want experienced men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 04:34 PM

Men are already judged for their lack of sexual experience, lack of dating experience and how many women (including their mothers) have broken their heart, left them or cheated on them. Have you not been paying attention?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/23 02:02 PM
1

LOL I can't take you seriously when you use terms like "beta male". It's about respect. Period. No "alpha" should be ok with their partner openly disrespecting them. How is something that has no inherently negative consequences disrespectful? I don’t get it. If she cheats on you, leave. If you think she’s cheating on you, leave. Petrified? lol that's ridiculous. I am not worried about my partner cheating on me, but I'm also not ok with her routinely putting herself in the path of a bunch of dude…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 02:43 PM
12

Let’s say you walk up to a random woman: “Hey, how are you doing? Having fun?/How’s your day/night going?” She doesn’t look at you, is actually looking away from you, and despondently says “Oh I’m good” Probably not someone you want to continue a conversation with, let alone flirt with. — Let’s say you walk up to another random woman: “Hey, how are you doing? Having fun?/How’s your day/night going?” She looks at you, she smiles and says “Oh hey how are you?! My day/night is going great/ I’m havi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 03:20 AM
3

Hard disagree. It is disrespectful to post such pictures or go out to clubs dressed like that if you know it bothers your partner. It does affect him, emotionally. It’s only “disrespectful” or affects him emotionally if he’s afraid of losing her or if she’s prioritizing some of those things over something he had planned. Vast majority of the time it’s no big deal. It’s beta male behavior to be concerned about these things. Also hard disagree. Relationships are about compromise and sacrifice. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/23 12:54 AM
2

Trying to put people in a box, mate guarding and expecting your partner to check certain boxes is not a boundary. A boundary relates to you and things that negatively impact you. A woman dressing in a vulgar way, posting bikini pictures or going to night clubs has nothing to do with her partner. There is no negative consequences to these actions. Preventing her from doing this is an attempt to mate guard, feel more comfortable & secure, and put her in a box. Is there anything wrong with preferri…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:41 PM
1

Well how would you turn every conversation sexual without coming across as juvenile or obnoxious? Let’s say she’s talking about her dog or her job as a marine biologist or her family, how are you going to turn that sexual without seeming like a slimeball? Why would the conversation even get to the point where she is talking about her dog or her job if you’re being direct? But to answer you’re question, whenever I’m chatting a woman that I am sexually interested in and the topic of work comes up …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 10:25 AM
0

Comments from female friends and posts here would have me believe they are, especially on dating apps and in bars and clubs - turning every conversation sexual even when it’s completely inappropriate, getting too touchy, trying to drag them away somewhere secluded and having no tact or respect for boundaries or comfort, negging excessively, getting hostile if they’re rejected. Men should be turning every conversation sexual if they want to have sex with a woman. They should always be direct with…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 08:47 AM
-1

This is a “beta male” mindset at it’s finest. Focus on what she does for you and whether or not she is compliant, respectful, genuinely attracted and treats you like a king. If you want to be better in bed, look into BDSM.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 07:00 AM
1

“SMV” and “looks, money, status” is for “beta males” who want to be approached, penetrated & fawned over by the opposite gender. Don’t be out of shape, dress well, have good hygiene, be presentable, speak to 5-25 women per day, have your own place, have your own car, don’t be afraid to approach women and tell them what you want, don’t be afraid of rejection. That’s all you need as a man to be successful in dating. The reason men are struggling is because they aren’t approaching women. They are p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/23 02:46 AM
2

Women don’t know what they want. Women say they want a man with a $200k salary but are in relationships with men who make $80-$120k Women say they want a $20k-$40k wedding ring but happily accept $5k Women say they want a man who is 6’3-6’5” but are in relationships with men who are 5’9-5’11”
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/23 05:42 PM
0

Women inherently do these things at the rate & frequency that men do? No, they do not
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 08:46 PM
0

Women are not romantic. Deal with it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 04:45 PM
1

Men are influenced by their communities, society and the media to be like that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 02:17 PM
1

If you have literally never met a woman willing to do this, the problem is you. it is not other peoples fault if guys want to Simp over shitty primadonnas. Most women usually have to be taught to do that or raised to do that. Society has made women being romantic taboo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 01:56 PM
1

I would use that as evidence too, if I didn't understood the affectsof being chronically online. No valid response? Lovely Being a simp and being romantic are not the same thing Apologizing, communicating, and making it up to people is being a simp, now? I thought it was just pedestalizing women who added no value to your life?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:53 PM
0

Romance requires acts of service, gifts, sacrifice, consideration, selflessness and empathy. How often would you say women provide that to men on their own accord in the relationship? Because 80-90% of men do. Again, just look at the TikTok trend where people told their partners “you could have been nicer for me today” and the responses the women had versus the men. The romantic men apologized & did anything they could to make the situation better whereas the women just angrily snapped, ranted, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:43 PM
-1

Women are not romantic so its easy to understand why people would believe romance is just sex + friendship. Romance requires acts of service, gifts, sacrifice, consideration, selflessness and empathy. Just look at the TikTok trend where people told their partners “you could have been nicer for me today” and the responses the women had versus the men. The romantic men apologized & did anything they could to make the situation better whereas the women just angrily snapped, ranted, complained and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:33 PM
4

Only “beta males” care about notch count.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:33 AM
1

What’s masculine about performing acts of service, paying rent money to your boyfriend or giving 33-50% of your salary to your husband for him to invest in?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/23 12:21 AM
1

No, I’m describing a woman who is invested in her man. Financial support only means a couple hundred dollars a month. If my girlfriend wants to live with me, I expect her to pay $300-$600 rent and perform acts of service.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 10:05 PM
1

A woman that pays rent, performs acts of service and buys gifts is going to be more invested in her man than one that doesn’t. That’s the secret to success in any long term relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 09:52 PM
1

The fact remains women that invest in a man are more likely to fall in love with & stay loyal to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 09:48 PM
0

Women can’t fall in love with or stay loyal to men they aren’t invested in
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 09:42 PM
1

80-90% of men do that anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 09:37 PM
5

If you believe this, you don’t have game
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 08:55 AM
1

The Red Pill has always been centered around 3 things “Every aspect of our society is dominated by feminism” “Feminist society has made men weak/overly accommodating/overly romantic/submissive/tricks/simps” “Women are inherently hypergamous. They want a man who is better than them and who can lead them” — The Blue Pill is anything that strongly disagrees with these 3 things.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 08:38 AM
3

Any man who complains about “modern day women” is a “beta male” who never or rarely gets women. The Red Pill community doesn’t know what type of woman they want because the type of women they want are either problematic (bi-polar, narcissistic) and/or don’t sexually desire them, which is why they become Red Pilled in the first place. Men should only deal with high interest women who sexually desire them, respect them, are compliant/submissive, add value to their life (gifts, acts of service, fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 08:12 AM
15

If men only tolerated women who respected them, added value to their lives and treated them like kings, society would be better as a whole. Sadly, men have low standards in themselves and in women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 08:05 AM

i hear you, but given that logic, wouldn’t that mean the dude who wants to have sex with a girl on the first date probably doesn’t see her as gf material? No, only “beta males” think this way. I’ll explain what I mean. there is SO much rhetoric online about men who dont view women who are “easy” (ex. sex on first date) as girlfriend material. Think of it this way: If you’re a guy who usually sleeps with women on the second, third or even fourth date, or has to “get to know” women over a couple o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 07:35 AM

Because movie dates give off boyfriend vibes and most guys want to fuck on the first date or on the regular. When women see you as boyfriend material, they go into angel mode and they hold out sex
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/23 05:37 AM
2

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 10:37 PM
1

I am currently in one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:40 PM
1

No woman is going to like the boundary because it is rooted in insecurity
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:39 PM
1

How is hanging out on night clubs or with male friends disrespecting you? Whatever answer you give is going to sound extremely insecure because they are insecure boundaries.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:36 PM
0

She’s going to be happy to leave. She’s going to think he’s controlling. Everyone in her life is going to tell her it’s a good thing. You mfs have no game
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:04 PM
1

1.) You don’t owe it to anyone to tell them why you walked away. 2.) You can always tell them you feel disrespected and emotionally cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:02 PM
-2

He is literally giving her an ultimatum on something that does not have inherently negative consequences
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 07:00 PM
0

How? If she cheats on you, you charge her to the game. A woman is going to be more likely to be promiscuous with male co-workers, online friends & followers or promiscuous at the bar or club if she knows the man she is with is afraid to lose her. She’s more likely to cheat on a coward than a mf who doesn’t care. Mate guarding her tells her that you can’t replace her
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:54 PM
1

Oh this is just funny. Someone who's afraid to stand up for himself, afraid to establish boundaries, calls others cowards. Your boundaries are rooted in insecurity. Establishing boundaries in a relationship is the opposite of cowardice. Not when those boundaries are rooted in insecurity. There are no inherently negative consequences to having guy friends, going on girls nights, going on girls trips or going to bars & clubs. There are inherently negative consequences in cheating. If she cheats yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:49 PM
1

There's also nothing wrong with establishing boundaries. I have a right to choose who I am in relationship with. Do whatever you want, just don’t tell the person you’re with your insecure ass boundaries. Those are going to be in the back of their head at all times and they’re going to think you’re weak and afraid of losing them for having those “boundaries” If we are in an exclusive relationship, yet a woman runs around night clubs with her male friends (just as she did when she was single), she…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 12:34 PM
0

Fair, but your whole premise rests on human behavior, cheating is a very human thing to do. Cheating is also a behavior with clear negative consequences. It is a literal betrayal. No man should ever be afraid to be robbed either, but that doesn't mean we disband the police. False equivalence. The only people in charge of policing a woman are her parents and herself. So if your girl is going out, dressed for the occasion, hair did, makeup fleeky and is at the club and specifically went without yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 12:29 PM
1

Having guy friends/friends of the opposite gender & going to bars and clubs don’t have inherently negative consequences. There is nothing wrong with those things in the context of any relationship, monogamous or polyamorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 11:47 AM
2

Flirting is human behavior Flirting (telling someone you are sexually attracted to them) with someone who is not your monogamous partner is emotional cheating. Having sex is human behavior. Having sex with someone who is not your monogamous partner is physical cheating. Having a friend of the opposite gender is not cheating as long as they are not spending more time with, influencing or flirting with your partner, then it could be considered emotional cheating. — Mate guarding happens because th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 10:22 AM
6

Trying to put constraints on human behavior is not a boundary. “Don’t disrespect me” is a boundary. “Don’t physically or emotionally cheat on me” is a boundary. “Don’t cause drama or speak negatively about me to other people” is a boundary “Don’t betray my trust” is a boundary “Don’t make serious, important or relationship impacting decisions without consulting me” is a boundary. “Don’t have guy friends” is not a boundary, it’s an insecurity that is screaming out. “Don’t go to bars or clubs” is …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 09:11 AM
-7

Trying to put constraints on human behavior is not a boundary, especially if the behavior is not guaranteed to have a negative consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 09:07 AM

I think your confusing what I mean in my post. What I mean is alot of guys are giving the advice of deleting all the apps if you have no luck at all and ask people out in real life. I understood exactly what you meant in your post. Once a man gets good at approaching people and asking people out irl by improving their mindset, appearance & behavior, the easier online dating becomes. But since your confidence has been killed between not getting any matches or some of the shit you see in profiles …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 06:43 AM

No, men with weak game when it comes to irl dating are going to have weak game when it comes to online dating. A guy with no sense of style, mediocre hygiene, and no “purpose” irl is going to have shitty photos on their online dating profiles. And 90% of men have shitty photos on online dating apps. A guy who doesn’t approach women or tell women what they want irl is not going to know how to bring their matches from the app to an actual hook up. He isn’t going to be able to differentiate between…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 05:54 AM
4

Most women don’t know what they want and most men don’t know how to go after what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/23 12:12 AM
7

While I believe that single men with no kids should only date single women with no kids, the type of judgmental men who think like this and see stepdads like this have no game and usually do not get women to begin with. Men with game don’t care about how other men go about their dating lives unless those men are asking them for advice. The men who see stepdads and men who date single mothers as “cucks/suckers”, are the 80-90% of the male population who cannot get women on a regular basis and do …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 09:01 AM
2

Unless you’re looking to intentionally give off “boyfriend vibes”, movie dates are the one of the biggest no nos in dating. I don’t care what number date it is. Movies should only be for women that you are friends with, in a relationship with or are beginning to take seriously. “Netflix and chill” will always be a thing, although there’s usually a little more involved (wine, ice cream, music, card games, etc) and it often happens after drinks at the bar, lunch, coffee, a get together or a FaceTi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 06:52 AM
2

You need to tell women you are interested in what you want from them. Always. Get right to the point. Make it known that your attention,time, affection is conditional and will not be available if things don't progress to a relationship. Don’t even do this. This is an ultimatum. Don’t give ultimatums. An ultimatum isn’t going to lead to a relationship. Just don’t talk to women who aren’t interested in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/23 02:00 AM
6

Sexual attraction is more than just physical. Behavior and appearance factor in as well. Women can think you’re attractive until you open your mouth, they smell you, they see your dirty fingernails, your worn ass shoes, your shirt buttoned all the way to the top, etc etc. Women can be sexually attracted to someone who is moderately attractive has a great sense of style, has a fresh haircut, smells nice, has accessories, knows what they want, keeps their conversations focused on what they want an…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 09:04 PM
0

Most men with a purpose want a submissive, compliant, female version of themselves. Other men with little to no purpose want a second mother or a best friend
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/23 03:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter